Abstract
NAD(P)H oxidase (Nox)2 and Nox4 are the isoforms of Nox expressed in the macula densa (MD). MD-derived superoxide (O2−), primarily generated by Nox2, is enhanced by acute ANG II stimulation. However, the effects of chronic elevations in ANG II during ANG II-induced hypertension on MD-derived O2− are unknown. We infused a slow pressor dose of ANG II (600 ng·min−1·kg−1) for 2 wk in C57BL/6 mice and found that mean arterial pressure was elevated by 22.3 ± 3.4 mmHg (P < 0.01). We measured O2− generation in isolated and perfused MDs and found that O2− generation by the MD was increased from 9.4 ± 0.9 U/min in control mice to 34.7 ± 1.8 U/min in ANG II-induced hypertensive mice (P < 0.01). We stimulated MMDD1 cells, a MD-like cell line, with ANG II and found that O2− generation increased from 921 ± 91 to 3,687 ± 183 U·min−1·105 cells−1, which was inhibited with apocynin, oxypurinol, or NS-398 by 46%, 14%, and 12%, respectively. We isolated MD cells using laser capture microdissection and measured mRNA levels of Nox. Nox2 and Nox4 levels increased by 3.7 ± 0.17- and 2.6 ± 0.15-fold in ANG II-infused mice compared with control mice. In MMDD1 cells treated with Nox2 or Nox4 small interfering (si)RNAs, ANG II-stimulated O2− generation was blunted by 50% and 41%, respectively. In cells treated with p22phox siRNA, ANG II-stimulated O2− generation was completely blocked. In conclusion, we found that a subpressor dose of ANG II enhances O2− generation in the MD and that the sources of this O2− are primarily Nox2 and Nox4.
Keywords: hypertension, superoxide, tubuloglomerular feedback, kidney, angiotensin II
kidneys are vital in maintaining adequate extracellular fluid volume, and they do so by regulating the excretion of Na+ and water. Abnormalities in Na+ and water excretion may result in inappropriate salt and water retention, which can facilitate hypertension. One of the mechanisms that the kidney possesses to regulate salt excretion is via the macula densa (MD). MD cells are modified epithelial cells located at the distal segment of the thick ascending limb (TAL) that comprise an integral component of the juxtaglomerular apparatus (JGA). MD cells serve as luminal sensors of NaCl concentration; they sense increase in NaCl delivery, to which they respond by initiating a sequence of events that results in an increase in adenosine and/or ATP release. These, in turn, constrict the afferent arterioles, lower capillary hydraulic pressure, decrease the single nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR), and decrease tubular flow back to normal levels. This series of events is collectively termed as the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) response. The TGF response establishes a negative feedback by which a change in tubular flow to the MD induces a reciprocal change in SNGFR, thus preventing acute fluctuations of flow and NaCl delivery in the distal nephron (7, 42, 51, 53, 59, 60). Hence, TGF limits urinary volume and Na+ excretion and thus may contribute to the maintainance of salt and water homeostasis. Any abnormality in the TGF response may alter the salt and water balance. Indeed, several studies (4, 6, 28, 30, 39, 45, 58, 59) have reported that TGF responses are enhanced in several experimental models of hypertension and that this may contribute to the hypertension.
MD cells not only initiate the TGF response, but the same signals also regulate renin release (54), which also plays a key role in the regulation of renal hemodynamics, salt and water excretion, and blood pressure. Due to the importance of these two mechanisms, they are tightly regulated by various factors, including ANG II, nitric oxide (NO), and superoxide (O2−) (56). Consequently, interactions between these factors may have an important effect on renal function. For example, NO in the MD blunts the TGF response via a cGMP-dependent pathway. O2− enhances TGF responsiveness mediated by scavenging NO and reducing NO bioavailability in the MD (35, 36, 50, 64). Thus, any factor that alters the levels of O2− may potentially modulate TGF, resulting in abnormal salt and water homeostasis. Therefore, it is important to understand the sources and mechanisms that alter O2− production in the MD.
The main source of O2− in the kidney is NAD(P)H oxidase (Nox), which has been shown to be present in the renal cortex, medulla, and blood vessels (21, 61). Nox has been implicated in several models of hypertension. Our recent study (64) demonstrated that Nox2 and Nox4 are the primary isoforms of Nox expressed in the MD. Moreover, we found that MD-derived O2− is enhanced by acute ANG II stimulation and by increases in NaCl and that this increase in O2− is primarily generated by the Nox2 isoform (20, 64). However, the effects of chronic elevations in ANG II on MD-derived O2− are unknown. Because inappropriate chronic elevations in ANG II may cause enhanced TGF and thus salt-sensitive hypertension, in this study, we determined the changes in expression and function of Nox in the MD after chronic ANG II stimulation.
METHODS
All procedures and experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Mississippi Medical Center. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) except as otherwise indicated.
Telemetry transmitter implantation.
Briefly, C57BL/6 mice (18–20 g, Harlan) were anesthetized with inhaled isoflurane (Butler Chemicals). A small incision was made in the middle of the neck for the insertion of the telemetry transmitter (PA-C10, Data Sciences). The catheter of the transmitter was placed in the left carotid artery and advanced down to the aortic arch. The body of the transmitter was placed subcutaneously in the right ventral flank of the animal. Mice were allowed to recover for 10 days.
Minipump insertion.
Osmotic minipumps (Alzet) were primed and filled with either ANG II (600 ng·kg−1·min−1) or saline (control). On the day of surgery, the animals, which had 10 days to recover from the telemetry transmitter implantation, were again anesthetized with isoflurane. Under sterile conditions, a small incision was made in the midscapular area on the animal's back. Using a hemostat, the subcutaneous tissue was separated and spread so as to create a small pouch in which the minipump was inserted. After insertion, the wound was sutured, and animals were allowed to recover for a day. Measurements of mean arterial pressure (MAP) were started on the second day after minipump implantation at 10-min intervals.
Laser capture microdissection and real-time PCR.
Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and real-time PCR were used to isolate MD cells and to measure Nox2 and Nox4 mRNA levels with methods we have previously described (19, 37, 64). Briefly, kidneys from C57BL/6 mice were removed and snap frozen in Optimal Cutting Temperature medium. Frozen sections (8 μm thick) were obtained and then stained and dehydrated using an Arcturus Histogene frozen section staining kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). MD cells were dissected with an Arcturus LCM System (Model Veritas). Real-time PCR was used to quantify mRNA levels of Nox2 and Nox4. Total RNA from MMDD1 cells was extracted with the RNeasy Micro kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's instructions. One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed at 25°C for 5 min, 42°C for 45 min, and 85°C for 5 min using the iScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad) following the manufacturer's instructions. Real-time PCR was performed in a C1000TM Thermal Cycler real-time PCR machine (Bio-Rad). β-Actin was used as a housekeeping gene.
Isolation and microperfusion of the JGA and measurement of O2− with dihydroethidium.
We used methods similar to those we have previously described to isolate and microperfuse the MD with the attached glomerulus (19, 36). Briefly, the kidneys were removed and sliced along the corticomedullary axis. Single superficial intact glomeruli were microdissected together with adherent tubular segments consisting of portions of the TAL, MD, and early distal tubule. Using a micropipette, samples were transferred to a temperature-regulated chamber mounted on an inverted microscope (TE2000-S, Nikon). The glomeruli were positioned so the MD could be visualized using a holding pipette. TALs were cannulated with an array of glass pipettes. MDs were perfused with physiological saline solution containing (in mmol/l) 10 HEPES, 1.0 CaCO3, 0.5 K2HPO4, 4.0 KHCO3, 1.2 MgSO4, 5.5 glucose, 0.5 Na acetate, and 0.5 Na lactate (pH 7.4); NaCl was 10 or 80 mmol/l. The luminal perfusion rate was 40 nl/min and was controlled with a pump (11 plus, Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MS). The bath consisted of modified essential medium containing 0.15% BSA and was exchanged continuously at a rate of 1 ml/min.
We used the O2−-sensitive fluorescent dye dihydroethidium to detect O2− levels, as we have previously described (33, 34). Briefly, once the TAL was perfused, MD cells were loaded with 10 μM dihydroethidium in 0.1% DMSO plus 0.1% pluronic acid from the lumen for 30 min and then washed for 20 min. Loaded MD cells were exposed to 380- and 490-nm light to excite dihydroethidium and oxyethidium, respectively. Emitted fluorescence from dihydroethidium was recorded using a 420-nm dichroic mirror with a 460/50-nm band-pass filter; for oxyethidium, we used a 565-nm dichroic mirror with a 605/55-nm band-pass filter. Square-shaped regions of interest were set inside the cytoplasm of MD cells, and their mean intensity was recorded every 5 s for 2 min. We recorded and calculated the rate of the changes for oxyethidium/dihydroxyethidium as an indicator of O2− production. Since we have previously found that increased luminal NaCl induced NO release by the MD (32, 34), we added the NO synthase inhibitor N-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (10 −4 mol/l) to the bath and lumen while measuring O2− to eliminate its reaction with NO, as we have previously reported (33, 34).
Measurement of O2− with lucigenin-enhanced chemiluminescence in MMDD1 cells.
Our experiments used MMDD1 cells, a MD-like cell line (kindly provided by Dr. J. Schnermann, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD) (62), in a manner similar to our previously described studies (20, 64, 65). MMDD1 cells were stimulated by ANG II (10−6–10−10 mol/l) for 12 h. O2− production in MMDD1 cells was determined using a lucigenin-enhanced chemiluminescence assay, as previously described (20, 64). Briefly, MMDD1 cells (10-cm dish) were washed with PBS twice, trypsinized in the dish, and kept in 9 or 12 ml Krebs-HEPES buffer [which contained (in mmol/l) 115 NaCl, 20 HEPES, 1.17 K2HPO4, 1.17 MgSO4, 4.3 KCl, 1.3 CaCl2, 25 NaHCO3, 11.7 glucose, and 0.1 NAD(P)H, with pH adjusted to 7.4]. Lucigenin (5 × 10−6 mol/l) was then added to the samples, which were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with oxygen bubbling. A 0.5-ml sample was transferred into 1.6-ml polypropylene 8 × 50-mm tubes, and, using a Sirius luminometer (Berthold Detection Systems, Pforzheim, Germany), O2− was then measured following the manufacturer's instructions. Luminescence was measured for 10 s with a delay of 5 s.
Preparations for small interfering RNA.
Nox2, Nox4, and p22phox small interfering (si)RNAs were designed and synthesized by Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). siRNA transfection was performed following the manufacturer's instructions as previously described (64, 65). Briefly, the transfection of the siRNA was performed using TransMessenger Transfection Reagent from QIANGEN (Germantown, MD) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Scrambled siRNAs were synthesized and used as negative controls. Twenty-four hours before transfection, MMDD1 cells were transferred onto six-well plates and transfected with 2 μg of each siRNA duplex using TransMessenger Transfection Reagent for 3 h in medium devoid of serum and antibiotics. MMDD1 cells were then washed once with PBS and grown in complete medium. Gene silencing was monitored by measuring RNA after incubation for 24 h.
Statistical analysis.
Data were collected as repeated measures over time under different conditions. We tested only the effects of interest using ANOVA for repeated measures and a post hoc Fisher's least-significant-difference test or a Student's paired t-test when appropriate. Changes were considered to be significant if P < 0.05. Data are presented as means ± SE.
RESULTS
Subpressor ANG II infusion induced hypertension in mice.
To demonstrate the effect of a slow pressor dose of ANG II on blood pressure, we infused ANG II with a minipump at a dose of 600 ng·min−1·kg−1 for 2 wk and measured MAP with telemetry in C57BL/6 mice. We found that basal MAP was 101 ± 3.1 mmHg and that this started to gradually elevate from day 5 of minipump insertion in the ANG II-treated group. Blood pressure continued to rise and reached a peak of 123 ± 3.8 mmHg on days 10–14 of the infusion (n = 7, P < 0.01). MAP of control mice infused with saline did not vary significantly (n = 5; Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
A slow pressor dose of infused ANG II induced hypertension. A slow pressor dose of ANG II at 600 ng·min−1·kg−1 was infused for 2 wk in C57BL/6 mice. Mean arterial pressure was elevated to about 22.3 ± 3.4 mmHg (n = 7). There was no significant change in blood pressure in mice infused with saline (n = 5). *P < 0.01 vs. basal.
O2− generation by the MD is enhanced in ANG II-induced hypertensive mice.
To determine whether O2− generation by MD cells increases after ANG II infusion, we isolated and perfused the JGA and measured O2− generation using dihydroethidium in mice infused with ANG II or saline for 2 wk by minipumps. The MD was perfused with 80 mM NaCl solution in the presence of N-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (10 −4 mol/l) in the bath and lumen. O2− generation by the MD was 9.4 ± 0.9 U/min in control mice. It increased to 34.7 ± 1.8 U/min in ANG II-induced hypertensive mice (n = 6, P < 0.01; Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Superoxide (O2−) generation by the macula densa (MD) is enhanced in ANG II-induced hypertensive mice. In the isolated and perfused juxtaglomerular apparatus, O2− generation by the MD was 9.4 ± 0.9 U/min in mice infused with saline. It increased to 34.7 ± 1.8 U/min in mice infused with ANG II for 2 wk via minipumps (n = 6). In the presence of apocynin, a NAD(P)H oxidase (Nox) inhibitor, O2− generation by the MD was 2.1 ± 0.3 U/min in control mice and increased to 12.4 ± 2.3 U/min in ANG II-induced hypertensive mice (n = 5). #P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05 vs. without apocynin.
To determine the source of O2− generation, we used the Nox inhibitor apocynin and repeated the above protocol. In the presence of apocynin, O2− generation by the MD was 2.1 ± 0.3 U/min in control mice and increased to 12.4 ± 2.3 U/min in ANG II-induced hypertensive mice (n = 5, P < 0.01; Fig. 2). These data indicate that there is a significant increase in MD O2− generation in ANG II-hypertensive mice and that Nox is an important source of this O2−.
ANG II increased O2− generation in cultured MMDD1 cells.
To further study the source of ANG II-induced O2− generation in the MD, we stimulated cultured MMDD1 cells with ANG II and measured O2− generation. First, we tested the dose-response curve. As shown in Fig. 3A, when MMDD1 cells were stimulated with different concentrations of ANG II for 12 h, ANG II at a concentration of 10−8 mol/l was the lowest concentration with a prominent effect on O2− generation. We then tested the time-response curve using 10−8 mol/l ANG II and found that 12 h of stimulation induced substantial O2− generation. Therefore, in the following experiments, we stimulated MMDD1 cells with 10−8 mol/l ANG II treatment for 12 h.
Fig. 3.
Dose- and time-response curves of ANG II-induced O2− generation in cultured MMDD1 cells. A: MMDD1 cells were stimulated with different concentrations of ANG II for 12 h. ANG II at a concentration of 10−8 and 10−7 mol/l was most effective on O2− generation (n = 41). *P < 0.01 vs. 10−10 mol/l. B: O2− generation in MMDD1 cells was correspondingly increased in response to 10−8 mol/l ANG II stimulation for different time periods and reached a plateau at 12 h (n = 37). *P < 0.01 vs. basal.
Under basal conditions, O2− generation was 921 ± 91 U·min−1·105 cells−1. O2− generation increased to 3,687 ± 183 U·min−1·105 cells−1. In the presence of the Nox inhibitor apocynin (10−5 mol/l), the xanthine oxidase inhibitor oxypurinol (10−4 mol/l), or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor NS-398 (10−6 mol/l), ANG II-stimulated O2− generation was 1,963 ± 122, 3,189 ± 83, and 3,246 ± 96 U·min−1·105 cells−1, respectively (Fig. 4). These data again point to the fact that ANG II-stimulated O2− generation in MMDD1 cells arises primarily from Nox.
Fig. 4.
Effect of different antagonists on ANG II-induced O2− generation in MMDD1 cells. ANG II stimulation increased O2− generation from 921 ± 91 to 3,687 ± 183 U·min−1·105 cells−1 (n = 29). In the presence of the Nox inhibitor apocynin (10−5 mol/l), the xanthine oxidase inhibitor oxypurinol (10−4 mol/l), or the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor NS-398 (10−6 mol/l), ANG II-stimulated O2− generation was 1,963 ± 122, 3,189 ± 83, and 3,246 ± 96 U·min−1·105 cells−1, respectively. *P < 0.01 vs. control; **P < 0.05 vs. ANG II; #P < 0.01 vs. oxypurinol and NS-398.
Nox2 and Nox4 mRNA levels in the MD are increased in ANG II-induced hypertension.
To determine the changes of Nox expression in the MD induced by ANG II, LCM techniques were used to isolate MD cells in mice infused with either subpressor ANG II or saline. Next, Nox2 and Nox4 levels were measured with real-time PCR. As shown in Fig. 5, Nox2 mRNA levels in the MD increased 3.7 ± 0.17-fold in ANG II-infused mice compared with control mice (n = 5, P < 0.01). Nox4 mRNA levels in the MD increased 2.6 ± 0.15-fold in the ANG II-infused mice compared with control mice (n = 5, P < 0.01; Fig. 5). These data indicate that both Nox2 and Nox4 isoforms of Nox in the MD significantly increased in subpressor ANG II-induced hypertension.
Fig. 5.
Nox2 and Nox4 mRNA levels in the MD are increased in ANG II-induced hypertension. Nox2 mRNA levels in the MD isolated with laser capture microdissection increased 3.7 ± 0.17-fold in ANG II-infused mice compared with control mice (n = 5). Nox4 mRNA levels in the MD increased 2.6 ± 0.15-fold in ANG II-infused mice compared with control mice (n = 5). *P < 0.01 vs. saline.
ANG II-generated O2− in the MD originates from both Nox2 and Nox4 isoforms of Nox in MMDD1 cells.
To determine which isoform(s) of Nox is the primary source of ANG II-stimulated O2− generation, we used Nox2 and Nox4 siRNAs to silence Nox2 and Nox4 genes and used p22phox siRNA to knock down the function of both Nox2 and Nox4. ANG II stimulation increased O2− generation in MMDD1 cells treated with scrambled siRNA from 967 ± 42 to 3,278 ± 94 U·min−1·105 cells−1. In MMDD1 cells treated with Nox2 or Nox4 siRNAs, ANG II-stimulated O2− generation was 1,632 ± 61 and 1,932 ± 57 U·min−1·105 cells−1, respectively. In cells treated with p22phox siRNA, ANG II-stimulated O2− generation was blocked (784 ± 83 U·min−1·105 cells−1; Fig. 6A). To further confirm the contributions from Nox2 and Nox4, we treated MMDD1 cells with both Nox2 and Nox4 siRNAs. ANG II stimulation increased O2− generation in MMDD1 cells treated with scrambled siRNAs from 853 ± 51 to 2,841 ± 83 U·min−1·105 cells−1. In MMDD1 cells treated with Nox2 and Nox4 siRNAs, ANG II-stimulated O2− generation was 718 ± 44 U·min−1·105 cells−1 (Fig. 6B). These data indicate that ANG II enhances O2− generation from both Nox2 and Nox4 isoforms of Nox in MMDD1 cells.
Fig. 6.
ANG II-generated O2− in the MD originates from both Nox2 and Nox4 isoforms of Nox in the MD. A: ANG II stimulation increased O2− generation in MMDD1 cells treated with scrambled small interfering (si)RNA from 967 ± 42 to 3,278 ± 94 U·min−1·105 cells−1 (n = 54). In MMDD1 cells treated with Nox2 or Nox4 siRNAs, ANG II-stimulated O2− generation was reduced to 1,632 ± 61 and 1,932 ± 57 U·min−1·105 cells−1, respectively (n = 23). In cells treated with p22phox siRNA, ANG II-stimulated O2− generation was blocked (784 ± 83 U·min−1·105 cells−1, n = 23). *P < 0.01 vs. control; #P < 0.01 vs. ANG II; **P < 0.01 vs. ANG II. B: ANG II stimulation increased O2− generation in MMDD1 cells treated with scrambled siRNAs from 853 ± 51 to 2,841 ± 83 U·min−1·105 cells−1. In MMDD1 cells treated with both Nox2 and Nox4 siRNAs, ANG II-stimulated O2− generation was inhibited (n = 15). *P < 0.01 vs. control; #P < 0.01 vs. ANG II.
DISCUSSION
ANG II, the key effector peptide of the renin-angiotensin system, is vital in the initiation and progression of hypertension, vascular hypertrophy, and atherosclerosis (29). These actions of ANG II, including vascular smooth muscle constriction, elevated systemic blood pressure, endothelial dysfunction, vascular remodeling, and retention of Na+, are mediated through ROS generated by Nox (23, 63). ROS are generated after ANG II-induced activation of ANG II type 1 (AT1) receptors. Indeed, most effects of ANG II in the MD (enhancing TGF and increasing intracellular Ca2+) are mediated through AT1 receptors. ANG II influences the O2− anion, an important signaling element for hypertension and other deleterious actions of ANG II. We previously used acute doses of ANG II to demonstrate that ANG II increases O2− in the MD and that the source of this O2− is Nox2. These increases in O2− enhanced TGF by quenching NO at the MD (20, 64). This raised the possibility that in situations associated with increased ANG II and oxidative stress, like hypertension, the increased TGF sensitivity and abnormal Na+ handling may be mediated by Rac-enhanced increases in O2−. However, these studies also used acute ANG II, which does not mimic pathophysiological conditions where ANG II is chronically elevated. In this study, we accomplished this by chronically infusing subpressor doses of ANG II. This chronic ANG II induces oxidative stress and salt-sensitive hypertension, increases proinflammatory factors, and leads to progressive renal injury (11–14, 16, 18, 24, 25, 31, 43, 44, 48, 49). Indeed, this chronic ANG II model is recognized as a good prototype of human hypertension and has been found to induce a gradual and sustained elevation in blood pressure over a period of time (8, 17, 22, 52). The dose needed to cause these subpressor ANG II-induced changes varies based on the route and species of animals. In mice, it fluctuates anywhere from 400 to 1,000 ng·kg−1·min−1 (2, 5, 9, 10, 15, 52, 57). In our study, we used ANG II at a dose of 600 ng·min−1·kg−1 since we found that this dose consistently elevated MAP by about 20 mmHg (Fig. 1). While this dose elevated blood pressure, it is not as well known whether subpressor ANG II alters oxidative stress at the MD level and, if so, what the primary sources are for ANG II-induced O2− at the MD. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine the changes in the expression as well as function of Nox2 and Nox4 in the MD after chronic ANG II stimulation. The key findings from our present study are that both Nox2 and Nox4 mRNA levels are increased in the MD after ANG II stimulation and also that the chronic ANG II stimulus enhanced O2− generation from both Nox2 and Nox4. O2− generated in the MD scavenges NO and plays a vital role in enhancing the TGF response.
Enhanced TGF responses have been found in several models of systemic hypertension. In this study, experiments were performed on the isolated perfused JGA and in a MD-like cell line, MMDD1 cells, to demonstrate that chronic subpressor ANG II elevated O2− in both scenarios. In isolated perfused JGAs from chronic ANG II-treated mice, we noted that chronic low-dose ANG II elevated O2− levels compared with control mice. This indicates that subpressor ANG II induced O2− in the MD, thereby contributing to the enhanced TGF and ANG II-induced hypertension. To determine the possible source of this O2−, apocynin was used in the JGA preparation. We found that apocynin blunted O2− production in ANG II-treated animals. We confirmed these observations with in vitro experiments using cultured MMDD1 cells. In these cells, ANG II-induced O2− logarithmically increased with increasing ANG II concentrations from 10−10 to 10−7 log mol/l (Fig. 3A). O2− production progressively increased from the time of initiation of the ANG II stimulation and reached a peak at 12 h after ANG II stimulation (Fig. 3B). This again reaffirms our findings that subpressor ANG II induces O2− in the MD of mice. Moreover, O2− from these cells was blunted the most after the addition of apocynin. This suggests that chronic subpressor ANG II increases O2− through the Nox system. Also, since apocynin only effectively inhibits Nox2, but not Nox4, it can be hypothesized that in the MD, in a chronic ANG II milieu, O2− may be generated not only from Nox2 but also Nox4. We are aware of a recent publication (27) in which the authors concluded that apocynin may act as a scavenger of ROS rather than a specific inhibitor of Nox in some cells. However, this conclusion was primarily based on an experiment in which apocynin at a concentration of 1,000 μM reduced the amount of O2− in cell-free systems. In addition, 1,000 μM apocynin did not have any effect on O2− levels in human embryonic kidney-293 cells transfected with Nox2 and p47. These data clearly show that apocynin is not simply an O2− scavenger. In our preparation, we used apocynin at a concentration of 10 μM. Given that this concentration is 100 times less than that needed to scavenge O2−, it is unlikely that apocynin acts via this mechanism in our preparation. We also realize that the concentration of oxypurinol we used in this study was pretty high, which could act as an antioxidant (3). Since xanthine oxidase is not a primary source of O2− in the MD, the results will not affect our conclusions for this study.
Our previous studies have demonstrated that the two isoforms of Nox in the MD are Nox2 and Nox4. To confirm this, we used LCM techniques to isolate the MD, as previously described (64). Real-time PCR was used to measure Nox2 and Nox4 mRNA levels. We noted that ANG II-treated mice had an about fourfold increase in Nox2 and a threefold increase in Nox4 compared with control mice. This suggests that both Nox2 and Nox4 isoforms of Nox are increased in chronic ANG II-induced hypertensive mice. Next, to isolate which isoform(s) of Nox is involved in mediating the chronic ANG II-induced O2− increases, in separate experiments, we used silencing RNAs against Nox2 and Nox4 to silence these genes. We found that silencing these genes blunted the effects of chronic ANG II on O2− generation; this suggests that unlike acute ANG II stimulation, chronic ANG II stimulates both Nox2 and Nox4 in the MD to generate O2−. To further test our hypothesis, we used p22phox siRNA to inhibit the function of both Nox2 and Nox4. We found that subpressor ANG II-induced O2− generation in MMDD1 cells treated with siRNA against p22phox was completely blocked, signifying that both Nox2 and Nox4 are activated by ANG II. Compared with Nox2, there is a paucity of studies defining the significance and mechanism of action of the Nox4 isoform. A study (38) on Nox4 has suggested that it is the primary source of O2− in TALs after acute ANG II stimulation. Welch et al. (41) infused rats with chronic ANG II, measured SNGFR in rats treated with siRNA against p22phox, and found that SNGFR in these animals was significantly lowered, implying that Nox plays a very significant role in the regulation of TGF-mediated SNGFR. Moreover, unlike Nox2, Nox4 is also a significant source of H2O2, which is essential in the regulation of vascular activity (1, 47, 55). In the present study, we mainly focused only on the generation of O2−. Limitations of the present study are that we were unable to perform all the protocols in vivo and in isolated perfused JGAs. We had to use a cell line, namely, MMDD1 cells. We expect that MMDD1 cells will yield results that are complementary with the results obtained in perfused JGAs and in vivo. We realize that, phenotypically, the MMDD1 cell line may not be exactly the same as actual MD cells in vivo (26). Any end-point differences between MMDD1 and actual MD cells should be interpreted with caution.
Although salt sensitivity is considered to be primarily an isolated defect in pressure natriuresis, along with this deficiency there exists an important physiological mechanism that plays a part in the renal physiological and structural changes leading to salt sensitivity. This mechanism is known as resetting the set point of TGF. In humans, resetting TGF contributes to the development of salt-sensitive hypertension (4, 30, 46). In these hypertensive models, administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or AT1 receptor blockers significantly reduce the sensitivity of the TGF mechanism (6, 28, 39, 45), and peritubular infusions of ANG II enhanced the TGF responsiveness (40). Thus, ANG II may contribute to the development of hypertension in part through its positive modulating effects on the TGF mechanism.
In summary, we found that a chronic subpressor dose of ANG II enhances O2− generation in the MD. The source of this O2− is primarily from Nox. Moreover, our data also indicate that chronic ANG II stimulates both Nox2 and Nox4.
GRANTS
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants R01-HL-086767 and PO1-HL-051971 and by American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship Award 13POST1422006 (to Y. Lu).
DISCLOSURES
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Author contributions: J.Z., Y.L., Y.D., P.Q., and J.W. performed experiments; J.Z., K.C., Y.L., Y.D., P.Q., J.W., and R.L. analyzed data; J.Z. and Y.L. prepared figures; J.Z. and K.C. drafted manuscript; K.C., L.A.J., and R.L. interpreted results of experiments; K.C., Y.L., Y.D., L.A.J., and R.L. edited and revised manuscript; R.L. conception and design of research; R.L. approved final version of manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Altenhofer S, Kleikers PW, Radermacher KA, Scheurer P, Rob Hermans JJ, Schiffers P, Ho H, Wingler K, Schmidt HH. The NOX toolbox: validating the role of NADPH oxidases in physiology and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 69: 2327–2343, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aragon AC, Goens MB, Carbett E, Walker MK. Perinatal 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin exposure sensitizes offspring to angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Cardiovasc Toxicol 8: 145–154, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Augustin AJ, Boker T, Blumenroder SH, Lutz J, Spitznas M. Free radical scavenging and antioxidant activity of allopurinol and oxypurinol in experimental lens-induced uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35: 3897–3904, 1994 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aviv A, Hollenberg NK, Weder AB. Sodium glomerulopathy: tubuloglomerular feedback and renal injury in African Americans. Kidney Int 65: 361–368, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brancaccio M, Fratta L, Notte A, Hirsch E, Poulet R, Guazzone S, De Acetis M, Vecchione C, Marino G, Altruda F, Silengo L, Tarone G, Lembo G. Melusin, a muscle-specific integrin β1-interacting protein, is required to prevent cardiac failure in response to chronic pressure overload. Nat Med 9: 68–75, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brannstrom K, Morsing P, Arendshorst WJ. Exaggerated tubuloglomerular feedback activity in genetic hypertension is mediated by ANG II and AT1 receptors. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 270: F749–F755, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Briggs JP, Schnermann J. Macula densa control of renin secretion and glomerular vascular tone: evidence for common cellular mechanisms. Renal Physiol 9: 193–203, 1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brown JJ, Lever AF, Robertson JI, Hodge RL, Lowe RD, Vane JR. Concurrent measurement of renin and angiotensin in the circulation of the dog. Nature 215: 853–855, 1967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Capone C, Faraco G, Park L, Cao X, Davisson RL, Iadecola C. The cerebrovascular dysfunction induced by slow pressor doses of angiotensin II precedes the development of hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 300: H397–H407, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cassis LA, Gupte M, Thayer S, Zhang X, Charnigo R, Howatt DA, Rateri DL, Daugherty A. ANG II infusion promotes abdominal aortic aneurysms independent of increased blood pressure in hypercholesterolemic mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 296: H1660–H1665, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cervenka L, Kramer HJ, Maly J, Heller J. Role of nNOS in regulation of renal function in angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Hypertension 38: 280–285, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chandrashekar K, Lopez-Ruiz A, Juncos R, Nath K, Stec DE, Vera T, Liu R, Juncos LA. The modulatory role of heme oxygenase on subpressor angiotensin II-induced hypertension and renal injury. Int J Hypertens 2012: 392890, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chin SY, Wang CT, Majid DS, Navar LG. Renoprotective effects of nitric oxide in angiotensin II-induced hypertension in the rat. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 274: F876–F882, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cosentino F, Sill JC, Katusic ZS. Role of superoxide anions in the mediation of endothelium-dependent contractions. Hypertension 23: 229–235, 1994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Daugherty A, Manning MW, Cassis LA. Angiotensin II promotes atherosclerotic lesions and aneurysms in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J Clin Invest 105: 1605–1612, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Deng X, Welch WJ, Wilcox CS. Role of nitric oxide in short-term and prolonged effects of angiotensin II on renal hemodynamics. Hypertension 27: 1173–1179, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dickinson CJ, Lawrence JR. A slowly developing pressor response to small concentrations of angiotensin. Its bearing on the pathogenesis of chronic renal hypertension. Lancet 1: 1354–1356, 1963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fitzgerald SM, Stevenson KM, Evans RG, Anderson WP. Systemic hemodynamic responses to chronic angiotensin II infusion into the renal artery of dogs. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 273: R1980–R1989, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fu Y, Hall JE, Lu D, Lin L, Manning RD, Jr, Cheng L, Gomez-Sanchez CE, Juncos LA, Liu R. Aldosterone blunts tubuloglomerular feedback by activating macula densa mineralocorticoid receptors. Hypertension 59: 599–606, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fu Y, Zhang R, Lu D, Liu H, Chandrashekar K, Juncos LA, Liu R. NOX2 is the primary source of angiotensin II-induced superoxide in the macula densa. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 298: R707–R712, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gill PS, Wilcox CS. NADPH oxidases in the kidney. Antioxid Redox Signal 8: 1597–1607, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Granger JP, Schnackenberg CG. Renal mechanisms of angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Semin Nephrol 20: 417–425, 2000 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Griendling KK, Minieri CA, Ollerenshaw JD, Alexander RW. Angiotensin II stimulates NADH and NADPH oxidase activity in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 74: 1141–1148, 1994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grunfeld S, Hamilton CA, Mesaros S, McClain SW, Dominiczak AF, Bohr DF, Malinski T. Role of superoxide in the depressed nitric oxide production by the endothelium of genetically hypertensive rats. Hypertension 26: 854–857, 1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Haas JA, Krier JD, Bolterman RJ, Juncos LA, Romero JC. Low-dose angiotensin II increases free isoprostane levels in plasma. Hypertension 34: 983–986, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.He H, Podymow T, Zimpelmann J, Burns KD. NO inhibits Na+-K+-2Cl− cotransport via a cytochrome P-450-dependent pathway in renal epithelial cells (MMDD1). Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 284: F1235–F1244, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Heumuller S, Wind S, Barbosa-Sicard E, Schmidt HH, Busse R, Schroder K, Brandes RP. Apocynin is not an inhibitor of vascular NADPH oxidases but an antioxidant. Hypertension 51: 211–217, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huang WC, Bell PD, Harvey D, Mitchell KD, Navar LG. Angiotensin influences on tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism in hypertensive rats. Kidney Int 34: 631–637, 1988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kim S, Iwao H. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of angiotensin II-mediated cardiovascular and renal diseases. Pharmacol Rev 52: 11–34, 2000 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kotchen TA, Piering AW, Cowley AW, Grim CE, Gaudet D, Hamet P, Kaldunski ML, Kotchen JM, Roman RJ. Glomerular hyperfiltration in hypertensive African Americans. Hypertension 35: 822–826, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Laursen JB, Rajagopalan S, Galis Z, Tarpey M, Freeman BA, Harrison DG. Role of superoxide in angiotensin II-induced but not catecholamine-induced hypertension. Circulation 95: 588–593, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu R, Carretero OA, Ren Y, Garvin JL. Increased intracellular pH at the macula densa activates nNOS during tubuloglomerular feedback. Kidney Int 67: 1837–1843, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu R, Carretero OA, Ren Y, Wang H, Garvin JL. Intracellular pH regulates superoxide production by the macula densa. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 295: F851–F856, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu R, Garvin JL, Ren Y, Pagano PJ, Carretero OA. Depolarization of the macula densa induces superoxide production via NAD(P)H oxidase. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 292: F1867–F1872, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu R, Pittner J, Persson AE. Changes of cell volume and nitric oxide concentration in macula densa cells caused by changes in luminal NaCl concentration. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 2688–2696, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu R, Ren Y, Garvin JL, Carretero OA. Superoxide enhances tubuloglomerular feedback by constricting the afferent arteriole. Kidney Int 66: 268–274, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lu D, Fu Y, Lopez-Ruiz A, Zhang R, Juncos R, Liu H, Manning RD, Jr, Juncos LA, Liu R. Salt-sensitive splice variant of nNOS expressed in the macula densa cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 298: F1465–F1471, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Massey KJ, Hong NJ, Garvin JL. Angiotensin II stimulates superoxide production in the thick ascending limb by activating NOX4. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 303: C781–C789, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mitchell KD, Mullins JJ. ANG II dependence of tubuloglomerular feedback responsiveness in hypertensive ren-2 transgenic rats. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 268: F821–F828, 1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mitchell KD, Navar LG. Enhanced tubuloglomerular feedback during peritubular infusions of angiotensins I and II. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 255: F383–F390, 1988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nouri P, Gill P, Li M, Wilcox CS, Welch WJ. p22phox in the macula densa regulates single nephron GFR during angiotensin II infusion in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292: H1685–H1689, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ollerstam A, Pittner J, Persson AE, Thorup C. Increased blood pressure in rats after long-term inhibition of the neuronal isoform of nitric oxide synthase. J Clin Invest 99: 2212–2218, 1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ortiz MC, Manriquez MC, Romero JC, Juncos LA. Antioxidants block angiotensin II-induced increases in blood pressure and endothelin. Hypertension 38: 655–659, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ortiz MC, Sanabria E, Manriquez MC, Romero JC, Juncos LA. Role of endothelin and isoprostanes in slow pressor responses to angiotensin II. Hypertension 37: 505–510, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ploth DW, Mackenzie HS. Tubuloglomerular feedback in one-kidney, one-clip hypertensive rats. Kidney Int Suppl 32: S115–S118, 1991 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Price DA, Fisher ND, Lansang MC, Stevanovic R, Williams GH, Hollenberg NK. Renal perfusion in blacks: alterations caused by insuppressibility of intrarenal renin with salt. Hypertension 40: 186–189, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Radermacher KA, Wingler K, Langhauser F, Altenhofer S, Kleikers P, Hermans JJ, Hrabe de Angelis M, Kleinschnitz C, Schmidt HH. Neuroprotection after stroke by targeting NOX4 as a source of oxidative stress. Antioxid Redox Signal 18: 1418–1427, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rajagopalan S, Kurz S, Munzel T, Tarpey M, Freeman BA, Griendling KK, Harrison DG. Angiotensin II-mediated hypertension in the rat increases vascular superoxide production via membrane NADH/NADPH oxidase activation. Contribution to alterations of vasomotor tone. J Clin Invest 97: 1916–1923, 1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Reckelhoff JF, Zhang H, Srivastava K, Roberts LJ, 2nd, Morrow JD, Romero JC. Subpressor doses of angiotensin II increase plasma F2-isoprostanes in rats. Hypertension 35: 476–479, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ren Y, Carretero OA, Garvin JL. Mechanism by which superoxide potentiates tubuloglomerular feedback. Hypertension 39: 624–628, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ren YL, Garvin JL, Carretero OA. Role of macula densa nitric oxide and cGMP in the regulation of tubuloglomerular feedback. Kidney Int 58: 2053–2060, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Romero JC, Reckelhoff JF. State-of-the-art lecture. Role of angiotensin and oxidative stress in essential hypertension. Hypertension 34: 943–949, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Schnermann JB. Function of the juxtaglomerular apparatus. Control of glomerular hemodynamics and renin secretion. In: The Kidney: Physiology and Pathology, edited by Seldin DW, Giebisch G. New York: Raven, 1992, p. 1249–1289 [Google Scholar]
- 54.Schnermann J, Levine DZ. Paracrine factors in tubuloglomerular feedback: adenosine, ATP, and nitric oxide. Annu Rev Physiol 65: 501–529, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Takac I, Schroder K, Brandes RP. The Nox family of NADPH oxidases: friend or foe of the vascular system? Curr Hypertens Rep 14: 70–78, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang H, Garvin JL, Carretero OA. Angiotensin II enhances tubuloglomerular feedback via luminal AT1 receptors on the macula densa. Kidney Int 60: 1851–1857, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Welch WJ, Chabrashvili T, Solis G, Chen Y, Gill PS, Aslam S, Wang X, Ji H, Sandberg K, Jose P, Wilcox CS. Role of extracellular superoxide dismutase in the mouse angiotensin slow pressor response. Hypertension 48: 934–941, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Welch WJ, Tojo A, Lee JU, Kang DG, Schnackenberg CG, Wilcox CS. Nitric oxide synthase in the JGA of the SHR: expression and role in tubuloglomerular feedback. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 277: F130–F138, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Welch WJ, Tojo A, Wilcox CS. Roles of NO and oxygen radicals in tubuloglomerular feedback in SHR. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 278: F769–F776, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Welch WJ, Wilcox CS. Feedback responses during sequential inhibition of angiotensin and thromboxane. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 258: F457–F466, 1990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wilcox CS. Oxidative stress and nitric oxide deficiency in the kidney: a critical link to hypertension? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 289: R913–R935, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yang T, Park JM, Arend L, Huang Y, Topaloglu R, Pasumarthy A, Praetorius H, Spring K, Briggs JP, Schnermann J. Low chloride stimulation of prostaglandin E2 release and cyclooxygenase-2 expression in a mouse macula densa cell line. J Biol Chem 275: 37922–37929, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhang H, Schmeisser A, Garlichs CD, Plotze K, Damme U, Mugge A, Daniel WG. Angiotensin II-induced superoxide anion generation in human vascular endothelial cells: role of membrane-bound NADH-/NADPH-oxidases. Cardiovasc Res 44: 215–222, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhang R, Harding P, Garvin JL, Juncos R, Peterson E, Juncos LA, Liu R. Isoforms and functions of NAD(P)H oxidase at the macula densa. Hypertension 53: 556–563, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zhu X, Manning RD, Jr, Lu D, Gomez-Sanchez CE, Fu Y, Juncos LA, Liu R. Aldosterone stimulates superoxide production in macula densa cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 301: F529–F535, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






