Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 11;2(2):53–61. doi: 10.1007/s11306-006-0022-6

Table 1.

Summary of PLS-DA results based on all training sets (ER = cross validation error rate in %, LV = number of latent variables, P = evaluation permutation test with e = excellent, g = good, m = moderate, b = bad)

Model Training data set
4040 3030 2020 1010 0505
ER LV P ER LV P ER LV P ER LV P ER LV P
1 12.5 6 e 20.0 7 e 17.5 2 g 25.0 4 m 10.0 4 m
2 16.3 7 e 15.0 6 e 25.0 6 g 10.0 3 g 20.0 4 m
3 13.8 7 e 18.3 7 e 5.0 11 g 10.0 8 g 20.0 4 b
4 12.5 7 e 18.3 7 e 22.5 6 g 20.0 3 m 60.0 3 b
5 11.3 6 e 18.3 7 e 12.5 10 g 10.0 2 g 50.0 1 b
6 15.0 7 e 8.3 7 e 20.0 6 e 10.0 2 g 40.0 1 b
7 15.0 7 e 15.0 7 e 20.0 8 g 15.0 3 m 20.0 1 m
8 11.3 6 e 16.7 7 e 17.5 6 g 25.0 1 m 40.0 1 b
9 16.3 7 e 16.7 7 e 35.0 6 g 50.0 5 b 40.0 2 b
10 7.5 8 e 13.3 6 e 10.0 9 g 20.0 5 m 0.0 1 g
Mean 13.1 7.0 16.0 7.0 18.5 7.0 19.5 4.0 30.0 2.0
SD 2.7 3.4 8.3 12.3 18.9