Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 17;43(1):26–31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft150

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of Cambridge City over 75 Cohort study participants

Interview wave
Mean (SD) (range) First (n = 2078) Second (n = 1141) Third (n = 640) Fourth (n = 379) Fifth (n = 166) Sixth (n = 76) Seventh (n = 15)
MMSE 25.4 (4.5) [0, 30] 24.3 (4.3) [0, 30] 22.7 (5.8) [0, 30] 22.0 (6.6) [0, 30] 21.4 (6.0) [5, 30] 18.9 (7.2) [0, 30] 16.3 (7.4) [0, 27]
Years to death 7.2 (5.0) [0.04, 22.2] 6.6 (4.5) [0.01,19.7] 5.3 (3.7) [0.01, 15.7] 4.5 (3.0) [0.1, 12.7] 3.5 (2.3) [0.1, 9.3] 2.2 (1.5) [0.05, 5.6] 0.8 (0.5) [0.1, 2]
Time between death and last interview (years) 3.5 (3.3) [0.01, 19.7] 2.7 (2.5) [0.01,19.5] 2.3 (1.9) [0.01, 15.6] 2.4 (1.8) [0.01, 10.3] 2.1 (1.4) [0.05, 8.4] 1.5 (1.2) [0.01, 4.6] 0.8 (0.5) [0.01, 1.9]
Women (%) 1355 (65%) 746 (65%) 437 (68%) 267 (70%) 120 (72%) 60 (78%) 13 (86%)
Physical impairment at study entrya (%) 1051 (50%) 489 (43%) 238 (37%) 123 (32%) 44 (26%) 18 (24%) 3 (20%)
Age at which individual left school 14.8 (2.1) [10, 26] 14.9 (2.2) [10, 26] 15.1 (2.3) [10, 26] 15.1 (2.4) [10, 26] 15.1 (2.0) [10, 26] 15.2 (2.0) (Fries 245–50) 15.3 (2.4) [13, 21]
Age at death 88.5 (5.4) [75.2, 106.6] 89.7 (5.0) [78.1,106.6] 91.6 (4.4) [81.8, 106.6] 92.7 (5.9) [85.0, 106.6] 94.6 (3.2) [88.7, 106.6] 94.6 (2.0) [91.6, 102.1] 98.2 (1.5) [95.7, 100.7]

aImpairment defined as present when the individual could not walk unaided around town or the block.