Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct;81(10):3814–3824. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00869-13

Table 1.

Genes with significantly altered expression 2 h after TcdA and TcdB injection

Gene Fold changea in expression after challenge by time point and toxin
2 h
6 h
16 h
TcdA TcdB TcdA+B TcdA TcdB TcdA+B TcdA TcdB
Dusp1 4.8 1.3 4.4 6.4 −1.0 10.1 1.9 1.1
Rhob 4.2 1.2 3.8 4.0 1.5 4.8 2.1 1.3
Atf3 4.0 1.4 3.5 2.7 −1.2 4.0 1.2 −2.0
Sprr1a 3.4 1.5 3.7 4.9 −1.1 8.8 −1.6 −1.4
C3 2.8 1.6 1.2 2.2 1.6 3.2 5.7 1.9
Areg 2.6 −1.1 2.5 12.8 2.4 15.5 14.9 5.1
Cxcl10 2.6 2.0 6.8 11.3 1.3 13.3 4.7 2.2
Insig1 2.5 1.5 1.8 −1.9 −1.1 −1.4 −2.3 −1.5
Errfi1 2.5 1.1 2.2 3.4 −1.0 5.5 −1.2 −1.4
Egr1 2.3 −1.1 1.5 2.5 1.9 5.0 3.7 1.4
Zfp36 2.2 1.1 2.0 2.9 1.8 3.4 2.2 1.2
Hmgcs1 1.8 1.2 1.6 −1.2 1.0 −1.1 2.4 1.5
Jun 1.8 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.6 −1.9 −1.1
Gm11545 1.6 1.1 1.7 7.3 1.9 8.2 5.6 3.8
1700006J14Rik −1.8 −1.3 −1.2 −1.3 1.4 −1.1 −1.6 −1.1
H3f3b −2.0 −1.5 −1.3 1.1 2.0 1.4 1.8 1.4
Lrrtm1 −2.3 −2.0 −2.2 −2.3 −1.5 −2.5 −1.9 −1.9
Slc8a1 −2.3 −1.3 −1.7 −3.4 1.4 −2.7 −2.9 1.0
Cxcl1 4.4 2.2 6.5 9.7 1.1 8.1 3.3 1.6
Mtch2 −1.5 −2.0 −1.7 −1.1 2.0 −1.6 −1.5 −1.2
Slc20a1 −1.9 −2.1 −2.5 −2.5 1.7 −2.7 −4.4 −1.5
a

Average fold changes relative to sham challenge are shown (values of −1.1 and +1.1 imply a 10% decrease and increase, respectively, in gene expression). The cutoff for determining a differentially expressed gene is q < 0.01 (see Materials and Methods).