Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 26.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2008 Nov 27;456(7221):534–538. doi: 10.1038/nature07524

The role of HLA-DQ8 β57 polymorphism in the anti-gluten T-cell response in coeliac disease

Zaruhi Hovhannisyan 1, Angela Weiss 2, Alexandra Martin 1, Martina Wiesner 3, Stig Tollefsen 4, Kenji Yoshida 5, Cezary Ciszewski 1, Shane A Curran 1, Joseph A Murray 6, Chella S David 6, Ludvig M Sollid 4,7, Frits Koning 3, Luc Teyton 5, Bana Jabri 1
PMCID: PMC3784325  NIHMSID: NIHMS91982  PMID: 19037317

Abstract

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II alleles HLA-DQ8 and the mouse homologue I-Ag7 lacking a canonical aspartic acid residue at position β57 are associated with coeliac disease1,2 and type I diabetes3,4. However, the role of this single polymorphism in disease initiation and progression remains poorly understood. The lack of Asp 57 creates a positively charged P9 pocket, which confers a preference for negatively charged peptides. Gluten lacks such peptides, but tissue transglutaminase (TG2) introduces negatively charged residues at defined positions into gluten T-cell epitopes by deamidating specific glutamine residues5,6 on the basis of their spacing to proline residues7. The commonly accepted model, proposing that HLA-DQ8 simply favours binding of negatively charged peptides, does not take into account the fact that TG2 requires inflammation for activation8 and that T-cell responses against native gluten peptides are found9,10, particularly in children11. Here we show that β57 polymorphism promotes the recruitment of T-cell receptors bearing a negative signature charge in the complementary determining region 3β (CDR3β) during the response against native gluten peptides presented by HLA-DQ8 in coeliac disease. These T cells showed a crossreactive and heteroclitic (stronger) response to deamidated gluten peptides. Furthermore, gluten peptide deamidation extended the T-cell-receptor repertoire by relieving the requirement for a charged residue in CDR3β. Thus, the lack of a negative charge at position β57 in MHC class II was met by negatively charged residues in the T-cell receptor or in the peptide, the combination of which might explain the role of HLA-DQ8 in amplifying the T-cell response against dietary gluten.


A specific assessment of the role of MHC class II alleles in antigen-specific T-cell responses is possible in coeliac disease, because it is caused by a single and well-defined antigen, gluten, which is present in wheat, rye and barley (reviewed in ref. 12). Gluten is rich in glutamine and proline, and the high content of proline renders gluten resistant to intestinal enzymatic digestion, explaining the persistence of intact peptides for immune recognition. Notably, despite the presence of few negatively charged amino acid residues in gluten and the expression of other MHC alleles potentially capable of presenting gluten peptides, all gluten-specific CD4+ T cells isolated from the intestinal mucosa of adult patients are restricted by HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 (refs 10, 13 and 14), and most recognize a dominant peptide with a deamidated Gln—that is, a negatively charged Glu residue5,6.

To study the T-cell response to native and deamidated gluten peptides (Fig. 1a), we immunized humanized HLA-DQ8 mice with the native 24-amino-acid gluten peptide 219–242 from the α2 (AJ133612) gliadin comprising the commonly recognized DQ8-α–I epitope (QGSFQPSQQ)10, or with a peptide deamidated at positions 229 and 237, the known targets of TG2 (ref. 6). As previously reported15, the deamidated peptide failed to induce superior effector or recall proliferative (Fig. 1b, left panel and Supplementary Fig. 1a, left panel) or cytokine (Supplementary Fig. 1b, left panels) CD4+ T-cell responses. Similar responses were also observed for lower, limiting doses of immunizing peptide (data not shown). However, under conditions of competition, when the two peptides were administered simultaneously, we found that the response against the deamidated peptide largely predominated over the native peptide (Fig. 1b, right panel and Supplementary Fig. 1, right panels). When peptides with single Gln to Glu substitutions at position 229 or 237 (Fig. 1a) were compared in the same competition assay against the native peptide, the E237 peptide behaved like the deamidated peptide, whereas the E229 peptide resembled the native peptide (Fig. 1b middle and lower panels). In accordance with previous studies concluding that the Glu residue at position 229 binds to pocket 1 (P1) of HLA-DQ8, whereas Glu at position 237 binds to pocket 9 (P9)6,9,16, these results indicate that an acidic residue at position P9 confers a functional advantage with respect to immunization.

Figure 1. Native and deamidated gluten α2-219–242 peptides recruit distinct, yet overlapping TCR repertoires.

Figure 1

a, Humanized HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice were immunized with native (Q) and deamidated (E) versions of the 24-amino-acid gluten peptide α2-219–242 and two E peptide analogues with a Glu residue either in position 229 (E229) or 237 (E237). The draining lymph nodes were collected 8 days after immunization and CD4+ T cells were purified to perform functional assays and derive α2-219–242 gluten-peptide-specific HLA-DQ8-restricted T-cell hybridomas. b, Purified CD4+ T cells were tested for proliferative in vitro responses with the indicated peptide at the specified concentrations in the presence of irradiated (30 Gy) spleen cells from non-immunized humanized HLA-DQ8 mice. Responses are given in c.p.m. from the mean 3H-thymidine incorporation in triplicate cultures ± s.d. n = 3 mice per each condition of immunization. The data are representative of three independent experiments for upper panels, and two independent experiments for middle and lower panels. c, A panel of α2-219–242 gluten-peptide-specific CD4+ T hybridomas was derived after immunization with native (Q ) or deamidated (E) peptide alone. Hybridoma reactivity was defined by measuring IL-2 secretion. Q and E hybridomas responded exclusively to native and deamidated peptides, respectively. Q = E, hybridomas responded equally well to native and deamidated peptides; Q >E, hybridomas responded 10–100 times better to native than to deamidated peptide; E >Q, hybridomas responded 10–100 times better to deamidated than to native peptide. The percentage of T-cell hybridomas obtained in each class is indicated. Importantly, assessing the quality of the immunization, no E-specific hybridomas were obtained after Q immunization, and conversely no Q-specific hybridomas were obtained after E immunization d, TCR β-chain variable region usage of individual hybridomas was defined by flow cytometry after immunization with Q (open circles, left panel) and E peptides (filled circles, right panel).

Using a panel of T-cell hybridomas derived from immunized lymph nodes, we compared the specificity and T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of CD4+ T cells elicited by the native and the deamidated peptides. Immunization with native and deamidated peptides induced crossreactive T cells, in addition to T cells recognizing specifically one or the other form of the peptide. Notably, nearly a quarter of the hybridomas generated against the native peptide showed a ‘heteroclitic’ response17 against the deamidated peptide, in that they responded much better to the deamidated than to the native peptide, with a shift in the dose response curve of up to 100-fold (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 2). Immunization with the native peptide, however, did not induce T cells that recognized the deamidated peptide exclusively, confirming the absence of in vivo deamidation in this experimental setting. Importantly, a heteroclitic response was never observed after immunization with the deamidated peptide.

Analysis of the TCR repertoire (Fig. 1d) revealed that most T cells recognizing the native peptide—whether elicited by immunization with the native or the deamidated peptides—preferentially used a limited set of Vβ chains including Vβ11, Vβ5, Vβ14 and Vβ2 T cells. T cells that exclusively recognized the native peptide predominantly expressed Vβ11 (45%) and to a lesser degree Vβ14 (15%), whereas T cells that equivalently recognized the two peptides mostly expressed Vβ5 (75%). In marked contrast, T cells specific for the deamidated peptide showed a broad TCR repertoire with no preferential Vβ (Fig. 1d) or Vα chain use (data not shown).

By studying the response of T-cell hybridomas to amino- and carboxy-terminal deletion mutant peptides, we identified five different patterns. Most (82%) of the T cells specific for the native peptide responded to the minimal 229QGSFQPSQQ237 9-amino-acid determinant (pattern 1), whereas the remaining clones responded to the minimal 9-amino-acid 228GQGSFQPSQ236 determinant (pattern 2; Supplementary Table 1, lower panel). Hybridomas responding equally well to native and deamidated peptides also showed a relatively restricted response pattern; that is, pattern 1 and 4 accounted for 78% of these hybridomas (Supplementary Table 1, lower panel). In contrast, T cells specific for the deamidated peptide showed at least four different response patterns, none of which was predominant (Supplementary Table 1, lower panel). Notably, response pattern 2, characterized by a response to 228GEGSFQPSQ236, was never observed for T cells specific for the deamidated peptide (Supplementary Table 1, lower panel), indicating a requirement for the acidic residue at position 237. The diversity of response patterns observed with T cells specific for the deamidated peptide might be due to shifts in the peptide register, as the structure of MHC class II molecules allows peptides to frameshift within the MHC groove18. Alternatively, a single register might be occupied by the deamidated peptide, but the diverse TCRs could contact different residues. Altogether, these results indicate that recognition of the native peptide imposes strict requirements leading to limited TCR use, whereas by displaying several epitopes by a yet undetermined mechanism, the deamidated peptide recruits a far broader TCR repertoire.

Examination of TCR sequences revealed the notable conservation of a negative charge at position 3 of CDR3β in most T cells recognizing the native peptide, including 92% of those specific for the native peptide, and 60–92% of those that responded to both the native and the deamidated peptides (Table 1). Importantly, 91% of the negative charges were non-germline-encoded, indicating an antigen-driven selection process (Supplementary Table 2). During TCR V(D)J recombination, further diversity is generated by the stochastic addition and deletion of palindromic and non-germline nucleotides at the coding joints between the gene segments. Specifically, here more than 35% of the non-germline-encoded negatively charged residues resulted from one non-germline nucleotide addition, 19% from three palindromic nucleotide additions and the rest from two non-germline, three non-germline, or one palindromic nucleotide additions and from the combination of two palindromic and one non-germline nucleotide additions (Supplementary Table 2). Interestingly, published TCR sequences from early islet infiltrates in NOD mice are also characterized by a conserved negative charge at position 3 of the CDR3β loop19,20. In contrast, only 29% of T cells specific for the deamidated gluten peptide had a negative charge at that position (Table 1). A possible model accounting for these findings is that HLA-DQ8- and IAg7-restricted TCRs against peptides lacking acidic residues must use a negative charge in their CDR3β to stabilize peptide–MHC (pMHC) complexes through charge–charge interactions.

Table 1.

Negative charge in the CDR3β loop of native gluten-reactive T-cell hybridomas

Hybridoma Specificity Vβ Jβ Length CDR3β
QR17 (FJ410957) Q 3 J1–1 6 CAS SsdiEV FFGKG
QP13 (FJ410958) Q 11 J2–7 6 CAS SLdsEQ YFGPG
QN17 (FJ410959) Q 11 J2–7 6 CAS SLdfEQ YFGPG
QQ21 (FJ410960) Q 11 J1–1 6 CAS SLdTEV FFGKG
QO14 (FJ410961) Q 11 J2–1 7 CAS SLenAEQ FFGPG
QN19 (FJ410962) Q 11 J2–1 7 CAS SLenAEQ FFGPG
QR5 (FJ410963) Q 11 J1–3 8 CAS SLdSGNTL YFGEG
QR11 (FJ410967) Q 14 J2–5 8 CAW SlpGGDTQ YFGPG
QP6 (FJ410965) Q 5.1 J2–1 9 CAS SLevNYAEQ FFGPG
QR28 (FJ410964) Q 11 J2–1 9 CAS SLELGnAEQ FFGPG
QR38 (FJ410966) Q 5.1 J2–4 9 CAS SLeTGQNTL YFGAG
QP18 (FJ410969) Q 1 J2–7 9 CAS SQdtGagEQ YFGPG
QR19x (FJ410968) Q 1 J2–7 9 CAS SQdtGagEQ YFGPG
EG5 (FJ410970) Q=E 5.1 J1–2 9 CAS SLevaNSDY TFGSG
QO3 (FJ410971) Q=E 5.1 J1–2 9 CAS SLeiaNSDY TFGSG
EJ3 (FJ410972) Q=E 5.1 J1–2 9 CAS SLevaNSDY TFGSG
EF18 (FJ410973) Q=E 5.1 J1–2 9 CAS SLevaNSDY TFGSG
QN8 (FJ410974) Q=E 5.1 J1–2 9 CAS SLeiaNSDY TFGSG
EB18 (FJ410975) Q=E 5.1 J1–2 9 CAS SLevaNSDY TFGSG
ED5S1 (FJ410976) Q=E 5.1 J1–2 9 CAS SLevaNSDY TFGSG
QR18 (FJ410977) Q=E 5.1 J1–2 9 CAS SLevaNSDY TFGSG
EF15 (FJ410978) Q=E 5.1 J1–2 9 CAS SLeTANSDY TFGSG
QF4 (FJ410979) Q=E 5.1 J1–2 9 CAS SLevaNSDY TFGSG
QQ34 (FJ410980) Q=E 5.1 J2–4 9 CAS SLesSQNTL YFGAG
EK1 (FJ410981) Q=E 8.1 J2–5 10 CAS gdlTGGQDTQ YFGPG
QC10 (FJ410982) Q=E 11 J2–2 10 CAS SLDRgdTGQL YFGEG
QN5 (FJ410983) Q>E 2 J2–4 8 CTC SAeaGNTL YFGAG
QP9 (FJ410984) Q>E 14 J2–3 8 CAW SltSAETL YFGSG
QR31 (FJ410985) Q>E 14 J2–3 8 CAW SlpSAETL YFGSG
QN13 (FJ410986) Q>E 14 J1–5 8 CAW SleagQAP LFGEG
QQ18 (FJ410987) Q>E 2 J1–6 10 CTC SAdsGVNSPL YFAAG
EF12 (FJ410988) E 8.1 J1–2 8 CAS gDsaNSDY TFGSG
ER7 (FJ410989) E 8.1 J1–2 8 CAS gDsaNSDY TFGSG
ET18 (FJ410990) E 14 J2–5 8 CAW SlpGGDTQ YFGSG
EK2 (FJ410991) E 7 J2–7 9 CAS SLgGQGYEQ YFGPG
EE6 (FJ410992) E 5.1 J2–5 9 CAS SLrgNQDTQ YFGPG
EE18 (FJ410993) E 6 J2–4 9 CAS SpaGSQNTL YFGAG
EP1x (FJ410994) E 5.1 J2–7 9 CAS SlwDRdYEQ YFGPG
ET11 (FJ410995) E 5.1 J2–3 9 CAS SLeitAETL YFGSG
EP4 (FJ410996) E 6 J1–3 10 CAS SlTGtSGNTL YFGEG
EA16S1 (FJ410997) E 6 J2–7 10 CAS SIppqsSYEQ YFGPG
ES1 (FJ410998) E 5.1 J1–2 10 CAS SlGTGkdSDY TFGSG
EQ10 (FJ410999) E 11 J1–2 10 CAS SLeaGtNSDY TFGSG
EH6 (FJ411000) E 11 J1–2 10 CAS SLeaGtNSDY TFGSG
EA39S2 (FJ411001) E 2 J2–2 11 CTC SAdDRGNTGQL YFGEG
QQ31-2 (FJ411002) E>Q 11 J2–7 7 CAS SLdgYEQ YFGPG
EE9 (FJ411003) E>Q 11 J2–1 8 CAS SLeGGAEQ FFGPG
EB4S2 (FJ411004) E>Q 11 J1–6 8 CAS SLEGNSPL YFAAG
EC25S3 (FJ411005) E>Q 14 J1–1 9 CAW SrGTtNTEV FFGKG
QR34 (FJ411006) E>Q 11 J1–5 10 CAS SLdGrgNQAP LFGEG
QR15 (FJ411007) E>Q 11 J2–2 11 CAS SLdgRsNTGQL YFGEG
EC53S3 (FJ411008) E>Q 11 J2–3 12 CAS SLeaGGrgAETL YFGSG
EF3 (FJ411009) E>Q 11 J2–3 12 CAS SLeaGGrgAETL YFGSG
EC42S1 (FJ411010) E>Q 11 J2–3 12 CAS SLnGGgrgAETL YFGSG

CDR3β sequences from T-cell hybridomas characterized in Fig. 1 are presented. Hybridomas names are indicated in capital letter Q when they were derived from immunization with native peptide, and in capital letter E when they were derived from immunization with deamidated peptide. GenBank accession numbers are in parentheses. Junctionally encoded amino acids are shown as lower-case. Amino acid residues at position 3 are bold when they are negatively charged.

To test whether the negative charge at position 3 of CDR3β is required for recognition of the native peptide, we generated a TCR mutant lacking the conserved negative charge (Fig. 2a), as well as a negatively charged HLA-DQ8 mutant in which an Asp was introduced at position β57 (Fig. 2b). The TCR was obtained from a representative Vβ5.1/Vα17 hybridoma that responded equivalently to the native and deamidated peptides and was retrovirally transferred into 58α−β− T cells. Notably, mutation of the conserved negative charge at position 3 of CDR3β (Vβ5.1 (E→Q)) resulted in complete loss of recognition of the native peptide, whereas the response to the deamidated peptide was preserved (Fig. 2a, middle panel). As a control, mutation of a non-conserved negative charge at position 8 of CDR3β (Vβ5.1 (D→N)) did not alter the response to either native or deamidated peptides (Fig. 2a, right panel). We next performed the reciprocal experiment in which HLA-DQ8 was mutated to introduce an Asp at position β57. Using T-cell hybridomas responding equally well to native and deamidated peptides, we observed a marked loss of response to the native peptide (Fig. 2b, left panel). Loss of recognition of the native peptide with the Asp 57 DQ8 mutant was also confirmed with three hybridomas recognizing selectively native peptides (data not shown). In contrast, recognition of the deamidated peptide was only moderately affected (Fig. 2b, right panel), consistent with previous studies showing that MHC alleles carrying an Asp at position β57 can bind peptides harbouring acidic residues. These results support the hypothesis that HLA-DQ8 β57 polymorphism can elicit strong responses against non-negatively charged peptides by recruiting TCRs that express a negative charge at position 3 of CDR3β.

Figure 2. Negative charge at position 3 of the TCR CDR3β loop is critical for native gluten peptide reactivity.

Figure 2

a, Generation of TCR-Vβ5.1-chain mutants from a representative Q = E hybridoma with either substitution of Glu to Gln at position 3 (Vβ5.1 (E→Q)) or Asp to Asn at position 8 (Vβ5.1 (D→N)). The mutated amino acids are indicated in bold. Wild-type (WT) Vα17 chain in association with wild-type or mutant TCR Vβ5.1 chains was retrovirally transduced in the CD4 transfected 58α−β− T-cell hybridoma variant29. Hybridoma transfectants expressing wild-type Vβ5.1/Vα17 (as a control, left panel), and mutated Vβ5.1(E→Q)/Vα17 (middle panel) or Vβ5.1(D→N)/Vα17 (right panel) TCR heterodimers were stimulated with either Q (filled diamonds) or E (open circles) peptide at the indicated concentrations. The IL-2 release values are the mean of triplicate cultures ± s.d. The data are representative of three independent experiments. b, A representative Q = E hybridoma was stimulated with Q (left panel) and E (right panel) peptides in the presence of wild-type HLA-DQ8 (WT DQ8, filled diamonds) or mutant HLA-DQ8 (D57 DQ8, open circles) with an Ala to Asp substitution at position β57. The level of IL-2 was measured using mouse cytotoxic T lymphocyte lines (CTLL) bioassay. The mean of duplicate cultures are shown, and data are representative of three separate experiments.

The amplitude of the T-cell response results from the combined strength of the binding of peptide to MHC and the binding of TCR to pMHC complexes. The strong response elicited by the native peptide was surprising given the lack of a negative charge to match the positive P9 pocket in HLA-DQ8. Indeed, whereas the deamidated peptide readily competed with the binding of indicator peptide to HLA-DQ8, binding of the native peptide was below detection (Supplementary Fig. 3a). When indirectly measured by hybridoma stimulation using a clone responding to both peptides, the binding of the native peptide exhibited similar on-rate but increased off-rate (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Overall these results are in accordance with previous observations showing strong in vivo and in vitro T-cell responses against peptides for which no binding to MHC could be detected by direct binding assays21,22. Furthermore, our data suggest that the instability of complexes between native peptide and HLA-DQ8 is compensated by the presence of a negatively charged residue in the CDR3β loop. In agreement with these findings, the presence of T cells during the short incubation time (1 h) of antigen-presenting cells with gluten peptides influenced the magnitude of their response against the native but not the deamidated peptide (Supplementary Fig. 3c).

Because the native gluten peptides recruit a T-cell population that is not only largely crossreactive but also substantially heteroclitic against the deamidated peptides, these cells could be recruited and continuously activated once inflammation is triggered and TG2 is activated to produce deamidated peptide. Consistent with this model, quantification of the CD4+T-cell response by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) showed that the frequency of T cells recognizing the deamidated peptide was consistently highly increased after immunization with a mixture of native and deamidated peptides (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Coimmunization with native and deamidated peptides amplifies the T-cell response to deamidated peptide.

Figure 3

Humanized HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice were immunized with Q or E gluten peptides alone, or in combination. Eight days after immunization CD4+T cells were purified and re-challenged in vitro with 32.3 μM Q or E peptides. The frequency of IFN-γ-producing cells was assessed using ELISPOT. Each bar represents the mean spot number of triplicates ± s.d. **P <0.001; data are representative of three independent experiments, each comprising three mice for each type of immunization.

To assess the pathogenic relevance of our findings further, we examined the TCR structure of human T-cell clones specific for the native DQ8-α–I epitope (QGSFQPSQQ). Notably, six out of six human T-cell clones, obtained from two independent research centres in Leiden and Oslo, expressed a TCR with a non-germline-encoded acidic residue precisely at position 3 of their CDR3β (Table 2). All these negatively charged residues were non-germline encoded and resulted from one non-germline (16.7%), two non-germline (33.3%), two palindromic (33.3%) and three non-germline (16.7%) nucleotide additions (Supplementary Table 3). In contrast, none of the three non gluten-specific T-cell clones derived from the same patients had this signature charge in their CDR3β (Table 3). To integrate these results in a more general context, we analysed 125 published TCR sequences obtained from HLA-DQ8 individuals with type I diabetes (n = 116), Birch (n = 5) and nickel (n = 1) allergy, or HIV infection (n = 3) and found that only 17 had a negatively charged residue at position 3 of the CDR3β loop. Interestingly, all of these 17 TCRs originated from the type I diabetes patients (data not shown).

Table 2.

Negative charge in the CDR3β loop of human native gluten reactive T-cell clones

Clone Specificity Vβ Jβ Length CDR3β
Spec16 (FJ410946) Q 7.1 J2–3 10 CAS SQdirNTGEL FFGEG
Spec12 (FJ410947) Q=E 9 J1–5 7 CAS SQddQPQ HFGDG
Spec12 (FJ410948) Q=E 1 J2–5 10 CAS SVydgRGETQ YFGPG
Spec13 (FJ410949) Q=E 9 J1–5 7 CAS SQddQPQ HFGDG
Spec13 (FJ410950) Q=E 1 J2–5 11 CAS sttPGTgTETQ YFGPG
TCC360.11 (FJ410951) E>Q 3 J1–6 7 CGs svdaSPL HFGNG
TCC360.8 (FJ410952) E>Q 1 J1–1 9 CAS SVeamNTEA FFGQG
TCC489.2.1.4 (FJ410953) E≫Q 1 J2–3 11 CAS SVeaGvsTDTQ YFGPG
Spec22 (FJ410954) Non-gluten 22 J1–5 10 CAS SlgpgdNQPQ HFGDG
Spec1 (FJ410955) Non-gluten 1 J2–3 11 CAS SVAGGlfTDTQ YFGPG
TCC360.10 (FJ410956) Non-gluten 13 J1–6 8 CAS reGyQETQ YFGPG

DR3β sequences of gluten-specific HLA-DQ8-restricted and non-gluten-reactive control T-cell clones are presented. T-cell clones were obtained from research centres in Leiden (Spec16, 12, 13, 22 and 1) and Oslo (TCC360.11, TCC360.8, TCC489.2.1.4 and TCC360.10). Spec12 and Spec13 expressed two functional Vβ chains, which can be explained by the absence of allelic exclusion. GenBank accession numbers are in parentheses. Junctionally encoded amino acids are presented in lower-case. Amino acid residues at position 3 are bold when they are negatively charged.

This study reveals a new mechanism of peptide recognition in the context of HLA-DQ8, the MHC class II allele that predisposes to both type I diabetes and coeliac disease. The P9 pocket of HLA-DQ8, lacking the canonical Asp 57 found in other alleles, has the potential to interact not only with peptides harbouring an acidic residue at the P9 position, but also with TCRs harbouring a negative charge in their CDR3β loop. The potent response generated in vivo against native peptides with extremely low affinity for HLA-DQ8 may be explained by the ability of these TCRs to stabilize pMHC complexes. A large proportion of the TCRs recruited by native peptides display a cross-reactive heteroclitic response to the deamidated peptide, which binds strongly to HLA-DQ8. Furthermore, because deamidated peptides do not impose charge constraints on the TCR, they can recruit an additional TCR repertoire. Consequently, the magnitude of the response against the deamidated peptide is increased under conditions in which native and deamidated peptides are both present. This may be particularly relevant in the context of coeliac disease, because TG2 is probably unevenly activated once inflammation is initiated. Furthermore, the magnitude of the T-cell response is viewed as a limiting factor for disease development23,24. In the absence of a disease model of coeliac disease, it is at present not possible to assess whether this process is important for disease onset, disease progression or other aspects of the disease. It also remains to be determined whether DQ β57 polymorphism also contributes to the strong association of coeliac disease with HLA-DQ2.

It is tempting to speculate that similar mechanisms may explain the association of type I diabetes with HLA-DQ8. The TCR repertoire of early pancreatic islet infiltrate is also characterized by the frequent presence of a negative charge at position 3 of CDR3β19,20,25. Furthermore, our preliminary studies suggest that TG2 activity is significantly increased in the pancreas, but not in the draining pancreatic lymph node and the spleen of 12-week-old NOD mice that have ongoing pancreatic inflammation (B.J. and L.T., unpublished observations). The ability to present native and deamidated peptides and recruit crossreactive TCR repertoires directly linked to the polymorphism at position β57 may underlie the remarkable association of HLA-DQ8 with severe immunopathology in mouse and human.

METHODS SUMMARY

Detailed methods are found in the Supplementary Information. Humanized HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice15 were immunized in the footpad with immunodominant native (Q) and deamidated (E) α2-219–242 gluten peptide versions of this peptide with glutamates in position 229 and/or 237. T-cell proliferation, cytokine enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent (ELISA) and IFN-γ ELISPOT assays were performed to analyse the immune response to native and deamidated peptides. T-cell hybridomas were generated after immunization with native and deamidated gluten peptides and their specificity was characterized by measuring IL-2 release26. TCR CDR3β sequencing was performed after TCR β-chain amplification with a set of TCR variable region (Vβ) sense and a TCR constant region (Cβ) antisense consensus primers as described27. TCR β-chain sequences were identified as TCR gene segments using BLAST and aligned/analysed using International Immunogenetics Database (http://imgt.cines.fr). The nomenclature is according to the World Health Organization-International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS) nomenclature28. Transfectants expressing wild-type and mutated Vα17 and Vβ5.1 TCR of hybridomas that responded equally well to native and deamidated peptides were generated by retroviral transduction of T-cell hybridoma variant 58α−β− (ref. 29). The soluble versions of wild-type and mutant DQ8 molecules were produced as previously described30. Human T-cell clones specific for the α2-219–242 epitope were established from intestinal biopsies of DQ8-positive coeliac disease patients as previously described10,13.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Sadegh-Nasseri for advice and discussion, and A. Bendelac and M. Mush for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Digestive Disease Research Core Center of the University of Chicago (DK42086), NIH DK67180, DK55037, the Celiac Disease Consortium (F.K.), EU MC-RTN 512385 (M.W.), the Research Council of Norway (L.S.) and the University of Oslo (S.T.).

Footnotes

Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature.

Author Contributions Z.H. executed most of the studies, participated in conceptual development and in the preparation of the manuscript; A.W., A.M., C.C., S.A.C., K.Y. provided technical assistance and input into data analysis. M.W., S.T., L.M.S. and F.K. generated and characterized human T-cell clones. C.S.D. and J.A.M. provided humanized HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice. F.K. and L.M.S. reviewed the manuscript. L.T. provided input into conceptual development and experimental design. B.J. developed the concept, supervised all investigations and wrote the manuscript.

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.

References

  • 1.Sollid LM, et al. Evidence for a primary association of celiac disease to a particular HLA-DQ α/β heterodimer. J Exp Med. 1989;169:345–350. doi: 10.1084/jem.169.1.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Spurkland A, Sollid LM, Polanco I, Vartdal F, Thorsby E. HLA-DR and -DQ genotypes of celiac disease patients serologically typed to be non-DR3 or non-DR5/7. Hum Immunol. 1992;35:188–192. doi: 10.1016/0198-8859(92)90104-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Acha-Orbea H, McDevitt HO. The first domain of the nonobese diabetic mouse class II I-A β chain is unique. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:2435–2439. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.8.2435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hattori M, et al. The NOD mouse: recessive diabetogenic gene in the major histocompatibility complex. Science. 1986;231:733–735. doi: 10.1126/science.3003909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Molberg O, et al. Tissue transglutaminase selectively modifies gliadin peptides that are recognized by gut-derived T cells in celiac disease. Nature Med. 1998;4:713–717. doi: 10.1038/nm0698-713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.van de Wal Y, et al. Selective deamidation by tissue transglutaminase strongly enhances gliadin-specific T cell reactivity. J Immunol. 1998;161:1585–1588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vader LW, et al. Specificity of tissue transglutaminase explains cereal toxicity in celiac disease. J Exp Med. 2002;195:643–649. doi: 10.1084/jem.20012028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Siegel M, et al. Extracellular transglutaminase 2 is catalytically inactive, but is transiently activated upon tissue injury. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e1861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Henderson KN, et al. A structural and immunological basis for the role of human leukocyte antigen DQ8 in celiac disease. Immunity. 2007;27:23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.van de Wal Y, et al. Small intestinal T cells of celiac disease patients recognize a natural pepsin fragment of gliadin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:10050–10054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.17.10050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vader W, et al. The gluten response in children with celiac disease is directed toward multiple gliadin and glutenin peptides. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1729–1737. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.33606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jabri B, Sollid LM. Mechanisms of disease: immunopathogenesis of celiac disease. Nature Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;3:516–525. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lundin KE, et al. Gliadin-specific, HLA-DQ (α1*0501, β1*0201) restricted T cells isolated from the small intestinal mucosa of celiac disease patients. J Exp Med. 1993;178:187–196. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.1.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lundin KE, Scott H, Fausa O, Thorsby E, Sollid LM. T cells from the small intestinal mucosa of a FR4, DQ7/DR4, DQ8 celiac disease patient preferentially recognize gliadin when presented by DQ8. Hum Immunol. 1994;41:285–291. doi: 10.1016/0198-8859(94)90047-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Black KE, Murray JA, David CS. HLA-DQ determines the response to exogenous wheat proteins: a model of gluten sensitivity in transgenic knockout mice. J Immunol. 2002;169:5595–5600. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.10.5595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Moustakas AK, et al. Structure of celiac disease-associated HLA-DQ8 and non-associated HLA-DQ9 alleles in complex with two disease-specific epitopes. Int Immunol. 2000;12:1157–1166. doi: 10.1093/intimm/12.8.1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Solinger AM, Ultee ME, Margoliash E, Schwartz RH. T-lymphocyte response to cytochrome c. I Demonstration of a T-cell heteroclitic proliferative response and identification of a topographic antigenic determinant on pigeon cytochrome c whose immune recognition requires two complementing major histocompatibility complex-linked immune response genes. J Exp Med. 1979;150:830–848. doi: 10.1084/jem.150.4.830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bankovich AJ, Girvin AT, Moesta AK, Garcia KC. Peptide register shifting within the MHC groove: theory becomes reality. Mol Immunol. 2004;40:1033–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2003.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baker FJ, Lee M, Chien YH, Davis MM. Restricted islet-cell reactive T cell repertoire of early pancreatic islet infiltrates in NOD mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:9374–9379. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142284899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yang Y, Charlton B, Shimada A, Dal Canto R, Fathman CG. Monoclonal T cells identified in early NOD islet infiltrates. Immunity. 1996;4:189–194. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80683-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chao CC, Sytwu HK, Chen EL, Toma J, McDevitt HO. The role of MHC class II molecules in susceptibility to type I diabetes: identification of peptide epitopes and characterization of the T cell repertoire. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:9299–9304. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yu B, Gauthier L, Hausmann DH, Wucherpfennig KW. Binding of conserved islet peptides by human and murine MHC class II molecules associated with susceptibility to type I diabetes. Eur J Immunol. 2000;30:2497–2506. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200009)30:9<2497::AID-IMMU2497>3.0.CO;2-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ploski R, Ek J, Thorsby E, Sollid LM. On the HLA-DQ (α1*0501, β1*0201)-associated susceptibility in celiac disease: a possible gene dosage effect of DQB1*0201. Tissue Antigens. 1993;41:173–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1993.tb01998.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vader W, et al. The HLA-DQ2 gene dose effect in celiac disease is directly related to the magnitude and breadth of gluten-specific T cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:12390–12395. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2135229100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Quinn A, et al. T cells to a dominant epitope of GAD65 express a public CDR3 motif. Int Immunol. 2006;18:967–979. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxl033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bendelac A, et al. CD1 recognition by mouse NK1+ T lymphocytes. Science. 1995;268:863–865. doi: 10.1126/science.7538697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Casanova JL, Romero P, Widmann C, Kourilsky P, Maryanski JL. T cell receptor genes in a series of class I major histocompatibility complex-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte clones specific for a Plasmodium berghei nonapeptide: implications for T cell allelic exclusion and antigen-specific repertoire. J Exp Med. 1991;174:1371–1383. doi: 10.1084/jem.174.6.1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arden B, Clark SP, Kabelitz D, Mak TW. Mouse T cell receptor variable gene segment families. Immunogenetics. 1995;42:501–530. doi: 10.1007/BF00172177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Blank U, Boitel B, Mege D, Ermonval M, Acuto O. Analysis of tetanus toxin peptide/DR recognition by human T cell receptors reconstituted into a murine T cell hybridoma. Eur J Immunol. 1993;23:3057–3065. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830231203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Scott CA, Garcia KC, Carbone FR, Wilson IA, Teyton L. Role of chain pairing for the production of functional soluble IA major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. J Exp Med. 1996;183:2087–2095. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.5.2087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary

RESOURCES