Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 9;2013:bat054. doi: 10.1093/database/bat054

Table 2.

Evidence code categories, evidence code names and definitions

Category Evidence code Types of evidence Supporting data
Experimental Inferred from Experiment (EXP) Any experimental assay
Inferred from Direct Assay (IDA) (i) Enzyme assays
(ii) In vitro reconstitution (e.g. transcription)
(iii) Immunofluorescence (for cellular component)
(iv) Cell fractionation (for cellular component)
(v) Physical interaction/binding assay (sometimes appropriate for cellular component or molecular function)
Inferred from Physical Interaction (IPI) (i) Two-hybrid interactions With column should be filled with Identifier of the interacting protein
(ii) Co-purification
(iii) Co-immunoprecipitation
(iv) Ion/protein binding experiments
Inferred from Mutant Phenotype (IMP) (i) Mutations, natural or introduced, that result in partial or complete impairment or alteration of the function of that gene
(ii) Polymorphism or allelic variation (including where no allele is designated wild-type or mutant)
(iii) Any procedure that disturbs the expression or function of the gene, including RNAi, anti-sense RNAs, antibody depletion, or the use of any molecule or experimental condition that may disturb or affect the normal functioning of the gene, including: inhibitors, blockers, modifiers, any type of antagonists, temperature jumps, changes in pH or ionic strength
(iv) Overexpression or ectopic expression of wild-type or mutant gene
Inferred from Genetic Interaction (IGI) (i) ‘Traditional’ genetic interactions such as suppressors, synthetic lethals, etc. With column should be filled with identifier of the interacting gene
(ii) Functional complementation
(iii) Rescue experiments
(iv) Inference about one gene drawn from the phenotype of a mutation in a different gene
Inferred from Expression Pattern (IEP) (i) Transcript levels or timing (e.g. Northerns, microarray data)
(ii) Protein levels (e.g. Western blots)
Computational Analysis Inferred by Sequence Similarity (ISS) Sequence, structural similarity-based analysis With column should be filled with identifier of the similar gene/protein
Inferred by Sequence Alignment (ISA) Pairwise or multiple alignment With column should be filled with identifier of the similar gene/protein
Inferred by Sequence Orthology (ISO) Assertion of orthology between the gene product and a gene product in another organism With column should be filled with identifier of the similar gene/protein
Inferred from Sequence Model (ISM) Prediction methods for noncoding RNA genes such as tRNASCAN-SE, Snoscan, and Rfam
Inferred from genomic context (IGC) Information about the genomic context of a gene product forms part of the evidence for a particular annotation.
(i) operon structure
(ii) syntenic regions
(iii) pathway analysis
(iv) genome scale analysis of processes
Inferred from Key Residues (IKR) Sequence analysis, where lack of key sequence residues is used to make a negative (NOT) annotation Should include NOT qualifier and With column is required if analysis is carried out by a curator and GO_reference:0000047
Author Traceable Author Statement (TAS) Original evidence is referenced in the article and therefore can be traced to another source
Non-traceable Author Statement (NAS) Statements in articles that cannot be traced to another article or experiment
Curatorial No Data (ND) Used for annotations when information about the molecular function, biological process, or cellular component of the gene or gene product being annotated is not available Should be used only with root nodes
Inferred by Curator (IC) Annotation reasonably inferred by a curator from other GO annotations, for which direct evidence is available GO ID should be filled in the from column

The evidence codes are used to represent the method or type of results used to define the annotation. Annotators should use this table as a quick reference guide and consult the detailed documentation available online (http://www.geneontology.org/GO.evidence.shtml) for specific details (including the do’s and don’ts) on how the method or results are matched to each evidence code.