Figure 3.
Crossmodal classification performance. A, Mean crossmodal accuracy in the multimodal ROIs superimposed with individual subject accuracies (open circles). Classification was significantly better than chance only in the pSTS. The pSTS was significantly higher than any of the other multimodal regions. ns, Not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. B, Pairwise classification accuracies. There were 15 pairwise discriminations among the six stimuli. In the pSTS ROI, 12 of the 15 discriminations yielded classification performances significantly above chance, as indicated by darker shaded bars (top). None of the pairwise comparisons were significantly better than chance in IFC and mPM, and only one was in aI (bottom).