Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Mol Med. 2013 May 1;13(4):626–639. doi: 10.2174/1566524011313040012

Understanding and targeting osteoclastic activity in prostate cancer bone metastases

Joseph L Sottnik 1, Evan T Keller 1
PMCID: PMC3624036  NIHMSID: NIHMS430531  PMID: 23061677

Abstract

Bone metastasis is a debilitating side effect of advanced prostatic carcinoma impacting nearly all of the men developing this disease. Even though a majority of these lesions are considered osteoblastic, it is believed that there is an underlying osteolytic component. Lytic processes are governed primarily by osteoclasts, the primary bone resorptive cell. Osteolysis has been implicated in tumor cell seeding and nourishment of tumor growth via development of pro-tumorigenic changes in the microenvironment. Herein, we provide a current view of the processes involved in regulating osteolysis in the presence of prostate cancer bone metastases. Several factors have been implicated in the division, differentiation, and activation of osteoclasts, including, but not limited to, interleukin-6, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP). Effector molecules in bone resorption play a significant role, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), cathepsins, and acid secretion. The primary method for treating skeletal events associated with prostate cancer bone metastases has been bisphosphonates. However, a new therapeutic, denosumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANKL in a mechanism similar to that attributed to the endogenous mediator OPG, has received approval for treatment of skeletally associated metastases. Additional novel targets are continuously being developed for bone metastases. In this review, we describe the processes involved in osteolysis of the prostate cancer bone microenvironment, and introduce therapeutics that may play a role in inhibiting tumor growth leading to increased survival and quality of life.

Keywords: IL-6, Denosumab, RANKL, OPG, Bisphosphonates, bone microenvironment, osteoclast, osteoblast, prostate cancer

Introduction

Bone is a common site for metastasis in a number of tumors, including prostate, breast, and lung cancer; however, this review will focus primarily on PCa bone metastases. Even though only 8–14% of men have clinically evident bone metastases at diagnosis, it has been suggested that 85–100% of patients dying from this disease will develop bone metastases, even if subclinical (1). Bone metastases are a significant concern for patients as they are typically painful and increase the risk of catastrophic pathologic fracture and other skeletal-related events (SREs). Patient care is further complicated as there is no cure for these lesions despite significant effort to understand the underlying biology and specifically target them (2). The development of bone metastases in older patients with advanced disease is of significant concern as this population presents with decreased bone mineral density (BMD), exacerbating the risks of SREs leading to decreased quality of life and possible morbidity. One of the main line treatments for PCa, androgen deprivation therapy, also leads to decreased BMD, and may be a cofactor in SRE development. Skeletal metastases are typically described as osteolytic, those that lead to bone resorption, or osteoblastic, those leading to enhanced bone formation. Many lesions consist of a mix of osteolytic and osteoblastic components. It is often difficult to determine the nature of a metastasis by radiography alone. Typically bone markers, such as alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin (OC), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) 5b, reveal mixed messages concerning changes in the bone environment, and may speak to the plasticity associated with bone metastasis (3, 4). Even though PCa bone metastases have an osteoblastic phenotype, they are thought to have an underlying osteolytic component important in tumor establishment and progression as previously reviewed (2, 5). One of the tenets of normal bone remodeling is that there cannot be bone production without prior bone absorption. It is only when these pathways fall out of balance that pathologies occur, and tumors are one mechanism than act to disturb this balance for their own growth promotion. Therefore, therapeutic intervention is required to improve quality of life and enhance survivability.

In normal bone, osteoblastic cells typically regulate bone turnover and osteoclastogenic activity. However, in the PCa microenvironment, many of these functions are co-opted by the tumor through the production of pro-osteolytic effectors. Several factors have been described as playing a role in the tumor induced osteolytic microenvironment. One such factor is receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) and it is supportive of the osteoclastic environment. RANKL expression has been shown to be induced by cancer cells leading to induction of osteoclast activity and osteolysis (6). Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL, and therefore inhibits osteoclastogenesis and diminishes osteolysis in the PCa microenvironment. Parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) has been implicated as having a growth promoting role on PCa once it metastasizes to the bone. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) may also increase osteoclast numbers by promoting the growth of pre-osteoclastic cells. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and cathepsins lead to the breakdown of the extracellular matrix allowing for degradation of mineralized bone by osteoclasts, and increased invasion and migration of tumor cells. Together, these factors help describe the role that osteoclasts play in the promoting PCa growth in the bone microenvironment, and provide plausible pathways for the inhibition of tumor growth in the bone.

Osteoclast Biology

Osteoclasts are the primary mediators of bone resorption. In orchestration with osteoblasts, the primary mediators of bone formation, and osteocytes, the conductors of these two cell types, bone homeostasis is typically maintained. Osteoclasts help maintain bone structure and function through continual remodeling of the microenvironment in response to a number of physical and chemical stimuli. Osteoclast growth and differentiation is controlled by a number of well described processes (Figure 1). The colony forming unit granulocyte- macrophage (CFU-GM) is part of the monocyte-macrophage lineage of cells, and the earliest precursor to osteoclasts (7, 8). The CFU-GM undergoes a relatively well described progression of differentiation that has been previously reviewed (8, 9). Briefly, macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF; colony stimulating factor, CSF-1), and interleukins-1, -4, and -6 (IL-1, IL-4, and IL-6) expand the osteoclast precursor pool and promote the formation of bone marrow macrophages (Figure 1) (9, 10). At this point, RANKL and M-CSF lead to promotion of a mature osteoclast through the expression of numerous genes associated with a mature osteoclast phenotype. Activation of the osteolytic phenotype is promoted by the presence of RANKL, PTHrP, and IL-6 (Figure 1). These cytokines lead to subsequent bone resorption which occurs through a defined process which has been previously reviewed in great depth (9, 11, 12). After activation and bone resorption is completed, osteoclasts undergo apoptosis which is enhanced by the presence of TGF-β and may be exploited by therapeutic intervention (e.g. bisphosphonates) (13). PCa cells exacerbate this system by creating many of the pre-osteoclastic cytokines described above, and will be discussed in greater detail below.

Figure 1. Osteoclast differentiation.

Figure 1

Important cytokines are listed at relevant points of differentiation. Legend: CFU-GM=Colony forming unit-granulocyte monocyte; OC=Osteoclast; RANK=Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B; RANKL=Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand; M-CSF=macrophage colony stimulating factor; OPG=Osteoprotegerin. CFU-GM are the earliest precursor in the osteoclast lineage. Presence of M-CSF leads to expansion of the CFU-GM pool and initiation of differentiation. The presence of RANKL and M-CSF leads to increased expression of genes characteristic of osteoclast. Continued presence of RANKL leads to continued differentiation into mature osteoclasts and promotes bone resorption by converting cells to an active phenotype. Throughout this process, OPG can mitigate the effects of RANKL leading to lack of differentiation and/or the bone resorptive phenotype. The presence of TGF-β is associated with osteoclast apoptosis and helps mitigate bone lysis.

Although a number of factors have been implicated in the differentiation of immature osteoclasts, it is well accepted that RANKL is required for terminal osteoclast differentiation and induction of osteolytic activity. RANKL is balanced by the antagonist OPG, which helps to regulate osteoclast activity, and thus bone resorption (14). Osteolysis begins when a mature osteoclast is activated by RANKL, leading to upregualtion of MMP-9 and osteoclast polarization. Osteoclast polarization leads to ruffled membrane formation and the osteoclast sealing itself to the bone. Subsequent release of acid, cathepsins, and MMPs lead to breakdown of inorganic and organic ECM and resorption of bone constituent proteins. PCa has been observed to promote bone resorption through the induction of RANKL producing an environment conducive to PCa growth (Figure 2) (15).

Figure 2. Therapeutic targeting the microenvironment of prostatic bone metastases.

Figure 2

Novel therapeutics are important for the targeting of osteoclastogenesis through osteoclasts themselves and relevant effectors. A snapshot of the prostatic bone microenvironment is shown with the location and impact of important therapeutics. There is significant crosstalk and overlap concerning the mechanisms by which PCa can alter bone homeostasis and promote not only an osteolytic, but an osteoblastic environment. Legend: CFU-GM=Colony Forming Unit Granulocyte-Macrophage; PCa=Prostate Cancer Cell; PTHrP=Parathyroid Hormone Related Protein; RANKL; Denosumab; Anti-IL-6 Ab=Anti-IL-6 Antibody; Interleukin-1,-4,-6=IL-1, -4, -6; OPG=Osteoprotegerin; OB=Osteoblast; Acid=Acid Secretion; MMP=Matrix Metalloproteinase; MMP-I=MMP inhibitor CAI=Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor; Bisphos=Bisphosphonates; OC=Osteoclast.

PCa is a predominantly osteoblastic disease. However, bone resorption precedes bone production, and thus it is understood that even osteoblastic processes have an underlying osteolytic component. Formation of a vicious cycle is based upon tumor growth promoting the release of calcium and growth factors stored in the bone and extracellular matrix (ECM) which lead to further promotion of tumor growth (2, 12). Indeed, it has recently been suggested that osteoblastic lesions occur at locations on trabecular bone upon which osteoclast resorption has recently occurred (1, 16, 17). This suggests that osteoclast activation may be a key early mediator preparing the metastatic niche and nurturing early PCa metastases. Akech et al. have shown that an induction of Runx2, a transcription factor typically involved in positively regulating osteoblast activity, may play a role in bone lysis (18–20). They found that increased Runx2 expression in PC3, a lytic PCa tumor, induced mediators of osteoclast activity whereas PCa cells with a mixed phenotype, osteoblastic and osteolytic components, such as LNCaP and its derivative C4-2B had lower levels of Runx2 expression.

One of the primary methods of treatment for PCa is castration leading to loss of androgen and inhibition of tumor growth. However, androgen deprivation therapy has also been associated with an increased risk of SRE and osteoporosis (21). These factors are compounded by the fact that older men already have decreased BMD due to andropause resultant from decreased sex steroid (testosterone) production (22, 23). The combined effects can be so great that they lead to bone loss greater than that of postmenopausal women (23, 24). Furthermore, alterations in calcium metabolism and parathyroid hormone lead to excessive bone resorption (25). Further coalescence of nutritional, genetic, and environmental factors accentuates osteoporosis (26). The combination of these factors makes the risk of SRE in men with advanced PCa a serious clinical dilemma. Current and novel therapeutics for PCa metastases must resolve possible conflicts with bone remodeling in aging individuals, so as not to exacerbate these conditions.

It has long been understood that physiologic bone remodeling begins with osteoclast activation. These processes may be mimicked by metastasizing PCa cells leading to underlying PCa pathology (8, 27–29). Recently, Cackowski et al. modulated fetal mouse osteoclast formation and showed that osteoclasts are necessary for angiogenesis, the growth of blood vessels, through an MMP-9 dependent mechanism (30). They further attributed these effects to the presence of RANKL, PTHrP, and MMP-9, as these factors are critical for regulation of osteolysis, but may be exploited by tumors to promote growth. It is therefore plausible that osteoclasts may promote angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment, a critical ingredient to tumor growth (31–33). Similarly, PCa cells have been shown to induce an osteoclastic phenotype in mature peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by regulating CD11b, which may be related to a common hematopoietic precursor cell (34). Metastatic PCa cells in the bone microenvironment compete for locations occupied by mesenchymal stem cells which have been suggested to be occupying locations of recent bone resorption (35, 36). These observations detail the importance of osteoclasts not only in preparation of the pre-metastatic niche for tumor cells, but nurturing continued growth of the tumor once seeding is complete.

Mediators of Bone Resorption

Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs)

Matrix metalloproteinases are a family of zinc-dependent proteases whose primary purpose is the breakdown of ECM, and thus they have a large role in bone remodeling. MMPs have been found to have a role in migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and cellular differentiation of numerous cell types including osteoclasts and PCa (31, 37–40). MMPs are important mediators of bone resorption, yet only have the capacity to breakdown proteins in non-mineralized bone. The primary MMPs associated with bone resorption are MMP-1, MMP-9, and MMP-13; all of which are collagenases. MMP-9 is also thought to play a role in osteoclast polarization (8). Type I collagen composes the greatest percentage of bone, and is critical to bones strength, durability, and flexibility as evidenced in diseases such as osteogenesis imperfect in which Type I collagen is mutated (41–43). Associations between collagen and PCa bone metastases have been suggested (41, 42).

MMPs are also important mediators of the metastatic process which has been extensively described (44–46). Levels of MMPs have been related to the metastatic characteristics of a number of tumors, and are important in tumor cell migration and invasion. PCa is no exception as MMP-1, -3, -7, and -9 have been shown to be mediators of PCa metastasis, specifically to bone (47). The presence of mineralized matrix has been shown to induce MMPs from PCa cells, and thus may be a mechanism to which facilitating osteolysis during tumor seeding and cell invasion (48). MMP-9 is specifically important for osteoclast polarization and ruffled border formation (8). Osteoclasts must orient themselves towards bone to reposition mediators of bone resorption and seal there external membranes to bone to promote a resorptive environment. Upregulation of integrin β3 has been found to be an important mediator of this process and helps maintain adherence of the osteoclast to bone (8). The importance of MMPs in bone metastasis has been shown in vitro and in vivo through the blocking of activated MMPs in culture to the use of novel inhibitors in animal models (12). MMPs work in concert with cathepsins and an acidified environment to resorb bone (Figure 2) (49). Interestingly, MMPs are responsible for initiating bone resorption, and also play a role in concluding it through breakdown and uptake of collagen I. Therefore, MMPs are not only important in tumor cell migration out of the prostate, but likely play an important role in metastatic formation and growth.

Acid Secretion

One of the first steps of bone resorption is acidification of the environment between bone and the sealed osteoclast to promote breakdown of the inorganic mineralized matrix. Development of ruffled borders on polarized osteoclasts leads to localization of H+-ATPase-dependent pumps that push H+ ions against a gradient into the resorption pit of osteolytic lesions (Figure 2). Increased acidity leads to demineralization of the bone. Osteoclasts then absorb the calcium ions present by a calmodulin dependent mechanism (50). Mineralized bone fragments and collagen are processed within the osteoclast and released into circulation. N-telopeptide (NTx), C-telopeptide (CTx), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) are serum based markers of bone turnover (8, 28, 51). Several hormones have been implicated in the production of acid in osteoclasts, including parathyroid hormone (PTH). Therapeutics, primarily diuretics, have been investigated in the inhibition of acid from osteoclasts, and have shown some inhibition of bone resorption. For example, the carbonic anhydrase II inhibitors acetazolamide and indapamide have been shown to inhibit bone resorption (52–54). Proton pump inhibitors used for the amelioration of indigestion, such as omeprazole, have also been found to inhibit acid secretion, though the long term consequences may be severe (55, 56). These data in conjunction with that of MMPs and cathepsins suggest that inhibition of osteoclast function may be sufficient to the inhibition of bone resorption. However, much investigation has also been performed to identify the cytokines involved in osteoclast growth and differentiation.

Cathepsins

Cathepsins are an important class of proteases that modulate the ECM similarly to MMPs. In fact, cathepsins are important in the cleavage of Type I collagen, osteopontin, and osteonectin; all of which are substantial ECM components of bone (Figure 2). There are 15 cathepsins, and each has a specific ligand for which it is active and cleaves at specific locations yielding a variety of breakdown products (57, 58). Cathepsins have been shown to be important mediators of metastasis across a range of tumors, including PCa (57). The primary cathepsins involved in the bone microenvironment at D, K, and L. It has previously been shown that over expression of cathepsin K can lead to increased bone turnover, whereas inhibition of cathepsin K can lead to significant bone loss (59, 60). The presence of cathepsins K and D in the sera of PCa patients has been associated with tumor aggressiveness and contributing to bone resorption (60–63). Cathepsin K is of specific importance because its expression is regulated by RANKL and is released by osteoclasts after acid degradation of the inorganic mineralized matrix thereby allowing collagen degradation prior to resorption (9, 64). For this reason, cathepsin inhibitors have been investigated to slow bone resorption and inhibit tumor growth in bone, but have found difficulty gaining acceptance due to severe toxicity (60). Novel therapeutics such as 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) have been shown to inhibit metastasis by altering tumor metabolism in other tumor models concerning bone, and inhibiting cathepsin L through a yet to be described mechanism (65–67). Several clinical trials have opened with a number of cathepsin K inhibitors, and have recently been reviewed (68). However, most of the investigation of these inhibitors have been performed in breast cancer and osteoporosis patients, with novel inhibitors only recently being applied to PCa bone metastases (60, 68). These studies provide evidence that cathepsins are a plausible mechanism by which bone resorption and tumor growth may be inhibited as long as toxicity is sufficiently managed.

RANKL

Even though there are a number of factors that lead to increased osteoclastogenesis, the primary mediator of osteoclast differentiation and promotion of the bone resorptive phenotype is RANKL. RANKL is a member of the tumor necrosis factor family, and is also known as tumor necrosis ligand super family member number 11 (TNFSF11) (69). RANKL has been shown to promote osteoclast differentiation, activation, adherence, and survival, leading to increased bone resorption (16, 70–75). Osteoclast activity under RANKL is important in the mediation of bone formation of cortical and cancellous bone, and has previously been shown to mediate bone volume, density, strength, and rigidity.

RANKL is known to exist in at least 3 active forms (RANKL1-3), two of which (RANKL1/2) are membrane bound (76, 77). The different isoforms have variant effects on the process of osteoclastogenesis (77). RANKL1 and RANKL2 contain transmembrane domains and are typically expressed on osteoblast membranes and thus require cell-cell interactions to activate osteoclasts (77). However, a soluble form of RANKL can be created by tumor necrosis factor converting enzyme (TACE) or membrane bound MMPs cleaving membranous RANKL (6, 78). Specifically, MMP-7 has been implicated in RANKL promotion in prostate cancer osteolysis (6). Evidence suggests that RANKL3, lacking the transmembrane domain, serves to bind RANKL1/2 and possibly inhibit osteoclastogenesis (76, 79).

Activity of RANKL is dependent upon binding to receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK; TNFRSF11A), the primary receptor for RANKL (14). Activation of RANK in osteoclasts leads to direct activation of c-fos allowing it to translocate to the nucleus promoting the transcription of at least 24 identified osteoclastic genes, including NFAT-c1 and c-Src (8, 80–82). Activation of RANK polarizes the osteoclast allowing for bone resorption (8, 70). c-fos is critical for osteoclast formation, but is not required for multinucleation to occur (83, 84). These changes subsequently lead to promotion of osteoclastogenesis and osteolysis as described above. Constitutive activation of RANK through tandem repeat expansion is the primary mechanism driving familial expansile osteolysis (FEO) leading to focal lytic disease that can expand and lead to significant skeletally related events similar to those seen in PCa bone metastases (14). RANKL can also increase migration in PCa cells through mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinase p38 and c-Jun activation (85). RANK activation of TRAF5/6 leads to activation of JNK1, c-Src, MAPK, and NF-κB which have a number of roles, predominantly concered with cell growth, migration, and survival (9).

The role that RANKL plays is not isolated to that of osteoclasts, but some preliminary studies suggest that RANKL can also alter PCa phenotype directly (86). RANK has been shown to promote migration of PCa cells (85). PCa can also induce osteoclast indirectly by inducing osteoblasts to express RANKL on their membranes, thereby activating osteoclasts to resorb bone (86). Outside of the effects on cancer cells, RANKL also plays an important role on T-helper cells, and has been implicated in the immune inhibition of breast cancer metastases; it is plausible that a similar mechanism is at work in PCa with direct and indirect effects on osteoclastogenesis, though these mechanisms need to be further elucidated (87–90).

Numerous activators of RANKL promote bone resorption through the effects of RANKL. However, these factors are balanced through the presence of IL-4 and IL-13 which typically lead to the production of OPG, the primary antagonist to RANKL (91).

Osteoprotegerin (OPG)

Osteoprotegerin (TNFRSF11B), also known as osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor (OCIF), is a 120 kDa homodimeric protein that acts as a decoy receptor for RANKL (14). Upon binding RANKL, OPG inhibits RANKL’s ability to activate RANK. This, in turn, diminishes osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast activation. Increasing the ratio of OPG to RANKL has been shown to result in increased bone mass (92). Knock-out of OPG in mice leads to severe osteoporosis due to lack of inhibition of RANKL (93). OPG is produced by maturing osteoblast cells to inhibit the maturation of osteoclasts. In bone, OPG is primarily located on the cellular surface of osteoblasts, but is also present on a variety of other tissues, such as lung, heart, and kidney. A single dose of OPG was found to inhibit more than 90% of osteoclasts within 48 hours in mice, showing the potency of OPG as an inhibitor of osteoclast function, but not necessarily osteoclast survival (71, 94). Inducers of OPG include tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2), both of which also play a role in osteoblast differentiation.

It is well described that induction of OPG leads to decreased bone loss under a number of scenarios (95). For example, Bateman et al. observed that hind-limb suspension, a method to investigate disuse and microgravity, mice could be treated with OPG and bone loss ameliorated (96). Furthermore, the production of OPG has been related to estrogen through competition with the estrogen receptor (97). The presence of the estrogen-response element binding protein is thought to be ubiquitous in bone, yet its role in males and PCa has yet to be defined, if it exists. Administration of OPG has been shown to prevent bone loss in ovariectomized mice, and significantly inhibits bone turnover (16). Due to the relation of Vitamin D3 and OPG, it has been observed that vitamin D deficiency leads to decreased PCa growth in bone of animal models (98). Furthermore, several studies suggest that OPG may be a reliable measurement of metastatic bone disease in PCa patients, possibly more so than PSA (99–101). However, a recent study by Corey et al. observed that C4–2B PCa cells overexpressing OPG protected the cells from apoptosis, yet limited growth in bone possibly due to increased BMD and trabecular bone formation (102). It is likely that decreased bone turnover and lysis physically restrict tumor growth. Furthermore, patients with advanced prostatic tumors with metastatic bone disease have been shown to have increased ratios of RANKL to OPG, suggesting that RANKL expression by the tumor may overwhelm endogenous OPG expression (3). It is well described that OPG is an integral component to bone homeostasis, and in conjunction with RANKL and RANK serves to mediate bone turnover. Even though therapeutics aim to mimic the effects of OPG in the metastatic setting further examination of the role of OPG in these patients is necessary to better understand the underlying biology (16).

Interleukin-6 (I L-6)

IL-6 is a member of the “interleukin 6-type cytokine” family and was first identified as a macrophage differentiation factor (103). Other members of this family include, but are not limited to: leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), oncostatin M, ciliary neurotrophic factor, interleukin 11, and cardiotrophin 1 (47, 103, 104). Numerous physiologic functions besides osteoclastogenesis are associated with this family of cytokines, such as: antibody production from B-lymphocytes, thrombopoiesis, and hepatic acute phase reaction protein synthesis. IL-6 mediates its activities through the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) which is composed of an 80 kD transmembrane portion (IL-6Rp80) that specifically binds a 130 kd membrane glycoprotein (gp130). The gp130 subunit is common to all members of the IL-6 family of cytokines and is important in signal transduction (105). Heterodimerization in the presence of IL-6 induces a signaling cascade primarily through, Janus activated protein kinases (JAKs), mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs), JNK, E2F/Rb, and STAT3 leading to activation of CREB, oncostatin M, and RANKL in osteoclasts (103, 106–110). In addition to the membrane bound receptor, a soluble form of the receptor (sIL-6R) can be produced by proteolytic cleavage or differential splicing of the 80 kDa subunit. sIL6-R can bind IL-6 and interact with gp130 to induce signal transduction and promote PCa growth (111). IL-6 has been found to be critical for osteoclast formation in vitro and in vivo through the suppression of NF-κ associated pathways (112, 113). Therefore, the production of IL-6 from PCa cells and its role in the bone microenvironment make it a critical cytokine to examine for bone metastasis.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that IL-6 can be correlated with progressive disease in PCa patients and may act as a growth factor for PCa cells (4, 114–116). It has further been shown that IL-6 correlates with tumor burden and PSA acting as a growth factor for PCa (117, 118). Men with castrate resistant PCa had a significant increase in IL-6 compared to men with localized disease, benign prostatic changes, and normal prostates (114, 115, 119). IL-6 and IL-6R have been shown to be expressed on normal prostate epithelium and in PCa (116, 120). It is hypothesized that expression of IL-6 and its receptor play a role in increasing proliferation, metastasis, and androgen independence in PCa by utilizing STAT3 as a signaling mediator (117, 120–122). Recently, Kim et al. have shown that inhibition of IL-6 in a metastatic PC-3 model led to inhibition of tumor growth and decreased metastasis (119). These effects appear to be tumor type dependent, as IL-6 can also inhibit the growth of melanoma, breast cancer, and osteosarcoma (103). IL-6 has been shown to be a critical mediator of multiple myeloma (MM). MM cells produce IL-6 to stimulate osteoclast leading to increased bone lysis which in turn allows for increased MM growth and invasion (31). Administration of anti-IL-6 antibodies has been shown to inhibit growth of subcutaneously injected PCa in animal models, and may have potential as a therapeutic for clinical disease (122, 123). These data describe the importance of IL-6 in PCa biology and metastasis.

PCa cells injected into the bones of mice have shown IL-6 upregulation, and it is believed that these changes can have direct effects on the localized bone microenvironment and bone remodeling (117). IL-6 promotes osteoclastogenesis primarily through the induction of osteoclastic precursors, and does not appear to induce RANKL directly (124, 125). Interestingly, these effects appear to be tightly related to the concentration of gp130 present on precursor cells. It has been proposed that the IL-6Rp80 itself is not able to induce signal transduction, but must interact with gp130. Therefore, it is likely that gp130 is the primary mediator of IL-6 activity in osteoclast precursor cells. The effects of IL-6 are believed to be independent of RANKL, but may help potentiate the effects of PTHrP.

Parathyroid Hormone Related Protein (PTHrP)

PTHrP is related to PTH, which is involved in regulating hematopoietic stem cell development and calcium regulation which it partially accomplishes through IL-6 (126, 127). Both molecules bind to the PTH-1 receptor (PTH-1R) due to similarities in their N-terminal amino acid sequences (128). PTH1R is a G-protein receptor that leads to PKA and PKC pathways activation (129, 130). PTHrP has been observed to be secreted directly from breast, lung, and PCa cells; all of which metastasize to bone. PTHrP was first identified due to its role in mediating hypercalcemia in tumor bearing patients (131). PTHrP typically acts in a localized paracrine or autocrine fashion. PTHrP leads to increased RANKL expression by osteoblasts, thereby indirectly leading to the promotion of osteoclastic activity (Figure 2) (9). It is plausible that PTHrP acts in concert with IL-6 to promote RANKL expression (132). However, PTHrP does not lead to increased 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D production as does PTH, and thus does not control intestinal calcium resorption although it does play a significant role in renal calcium homeostasis. In fact, PTHrP is suppressed by 1,25-di-hydroxyvitamin D3 by mediating post-transcriptional pathways, decreasing mRNA stability, and inducing protein degradation by PCa (133). It has also been shown that PTHrP can act on osteoblasts to increase IL-6 and LIF to activate osteoclasts and inhibit osteoblast differentiation (103, 134, 135).

In normal bone, PTHrP serves to help regulate bone development, specifically endochondral bone growth. For example, selective depletion of PTHrP from osteoblasts leads to decreased bone mass, inhibition of osteoblast survival, and trabecular osteopenia (136, 137). The ability of PCa to secrete PTHrP and the ability of this molecule to regulate bone absorption and serum calcium makes it an interesting target for PCa therapy. PTHrP has also been found to associate with PCa progression, especially bone metastasis (129, 138). Indeed, PTHrP secretion from the tumor microenvironment can lead to an increase in monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), inducing osteoclast recruitment and differentiation while promoting a pro-tumorigenic immune infiltrate of monocytes (139–141). However, the role of PTHrP is relatively complex, as it may also act as an inducer of anabolic bone growth dependent on the differentiation state of effector cells (129). A recent paper by Liao et al. described overexpression of PTHrP from PCa cells lead to an increase in bone density (142). However, an increase in osteoclastogenesis was also observed. These observations along with those of others describe complex interactions dependent on the amount of PTHrP produced, the cells present in the microenvironment, and the differentiation state of all players in the PCa microenvironment (20, 139, 143–147).

Therapy

Denosumab

Denosumab (Xgeva™) is a fully humanized monoclonal IgG2 antibody developed by Amgen with a high affinity for RANKL. Denosumab is thought to have similar effects as OPG in that it is able to bind free RANKL and inhibit binding to RANK, thereby inhibiting osteoclast differentiation and activation (Figure 2). The development and impact of Denosumab have recently been thoroughly reviewed (16, 148). Denosumab has completed phase I and phase II clinical trials establishing sufficient pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic relationships for phase III clinical trials in PCa patient cohorts (16, 106, 148–150). The optimal dosing regimen was determined from a phase II trial investigating 5 distinct dosing regiments in bone metastasis patients not previously treated with bisphosphonates. Fizazi et al. showed that denosumab increased time to first SRE by over 3-months when compared to the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid, helping to clear the way for FDA approval (106). It was determined that the greatest suppression of bone resorption occurred with a 120 mg dose every 4 weeks (16, 106, 151). Several other phase II studies were recently completed and currently under way to confirm these findings and further define dosing for various patient populations (148, 152, 153). The preponderance of positive studies has led to the recent approval of denosumab for prevention of bone metastatic skeletal-related events. Denosumab treatments are typically well tolerated with the most reported side effects being back pain, dizziness, arthralgia, and musculoskeletal pain (16). Concerns of hypocalcemia persist even though this effect is typically transient, and the nadir for serum calcium reported around day 10. Due to the effects of RANKL on T and B cells, denosumab may increase the risk of infection in patients, although a significant difference was not appreciated when compared to placebo administration. A number of phase III clinical trials have originated in a number of tumor types, including PCa (106, 149).

Currently, there are 3 phase III studies ongoing investigating the effects of denosumab for metastatic PCa to bone (www.clinicaltrials.gov). As there is no standard of care for bone loss due to androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer, new therapeutics are needed to combat the disease itself and the side effects associated with hormone therapy. Many physicians resort to the use of bisphosphonates due to the growing evidence from the osteoporosis field.

Bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates are one of the primary mechanisms used to control osteoclast activity (Figure 2). There are two classes of bisphosphonates used clinically, the N-containing, and the non-N-containing; each with its own independent mechanism of action. N-containing bisphosphonates include pamidronate (Aredia™), residronate (Actonel™), and zoledronic acid (Zometa™). These bisphosphonates block the enzyme farnesyl diphosphate synthase, part of the mevalonate pathway, and inhibit protein prenylation. Inhibition of prenylation leads to improper membrane integration, and lack of protein function within the osteoclast. This process can also inhibit the Rho family of proteins, leading to inhibition of osteolysis through improper fusion of the osteoclast to the bone. Non-N-containing bisphosphonates include clodronate and etidronate. These bisphosphonates resemble adenosine triphosphate and lead to an inhibition of normal cellular metabolism prompting cells to undergo apoptosis. However, some studies suggest that osteoclast activity is simply inhibited rather than cells undergoing apoptosis. It has been suggested that glucocorticoids abrogate the apoptotic effects of bisphosphonates (154). Furthermore, breast cancer cells have been shown to protect osteoclasts from apoptosis through M-CSF production (155). Further research is needed to elucidate the role of bisphosphonates on osteoclasts, especially as it pertains to the metastatic bone microenvironment.

Zoledronic acid has been the focus of a number of clinical trials across a variety of tumors for its ability to inhibit osteolysis in bone metastases from prostate, breast, lung, myeloma, and a number of other tumors. At the time of this review, there are 206 total clinical trials concerning the use of zoledronic acid alone (www.clinicaltrials.gov). More specifically, there are 50 clinical trials investigating the role of zoledronic acid for prostate cancer, many in combination with other therapeutics. Zoledronic acid is believed to be one of the best methods for controlling bone metastases, even though toxicity does include normal bone loss and other musculoskeletal related side effects. Zoledronic acid and residronate have been found to inhibit tumor growth while retaining BMD and overall bone strength (64, 156). However, indications are still early, and denosumab has also shown the ability to retain BMD while inhibiting tumor growth in the AZURE (adjuvant zoledronic acid to reduce recurrence) trial (150).

Combination of zoledronic acid and RANKL-inhibition have been shown to inhibit osteolysis in animal models, and clinical trials are ongoing to determine clinical efficacy but preliminary results are encouraging (157, 158). Baron et al. have suggested that the differential mechanisms of action, denosumab acting in the extracellular milieu and zoledronic acid working internally, lead to differential impacts on osteoclast formation and activity and synergistically inhibiting osteoclast viability (94). It has also been discovered that calcium signaling and regulation may play a key role in metastasis and inhibit PCa apoptosis (145, 159, 160). It has been suggested that blocking calcium release from bone using bisphosphonates and OPG may inhibit metastasis to bone (161). Even though these therapeutics impact different aspects of osteoclast biology, it is plausible that further study will elucidate clinical gains in osteolytic inhibition as it pertains to PCa.

Other therapeutics

There are a number of other pathways being explored to inhibit PCa bone metastases outside of bisphosphonates and denosumab, and many of these have been recently and extensively reviewed (12, 57, 94, 151, 158, 161) (Figure 2). As described above, MMPs are integral in ECM degradation and enhance the mobility of PCa cells. Inhibition of MMPs using SB-3CT, a gelatinase inhibitor, PCK3145, a synthetic peptide, and silibinin, a naturally occurring small molecule inhibitor, have been shown to inhibit osteolysis in animal models (6, 12, 162–166). Even though TGF-β has been shown to be of greater importance in breast cancer metastases to bone, TGF-β does play a role in the regulation of osteoclastogenesis and investigation into the role of TGF-β inhibitors in PCa are progressing (8, 167, 168), though with conflicting results.

The use radiation has been of great importance for the treatment of localized prostatic disease. However, the use of systemic radionuclides has been of enhanced recent interest as specific isotopes such as strontium-89 home directly to bone when injected, and reside in relatively high concentrations in these locations (151). Other radionuclides, such as samarium-153, can also be linked to a bisphosphonate to increase their abundance in bone (151). Typically these therapies have been associated with palliative therapy, but new evidence suggests that there may also be therapeutic gain when radionuclides can be directed directly to bone metastases. One method for enhancing radionuclide efficacy is linking the nuclides to antibodies or particles preferentially taken up by osteoclasts, such as bisphosphonates. This therapy allows for high concentrations of radionuclides to be present in the metastatic microenvironment and spare normal tissue as much as possible due to the relatively short linear energy transfer of beta or alpha particles emitted (151).

The use of monoclonal antibodies and small molecule inhibitors have been used to some success in other tumors, and ongoing clinical trials are currently underway for PCa. For example, vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor has been shown to inhibit PCa growth in bone, even though it promotes osteolysis through an induction of PTHrP (169). A novel HSP90 inhibitor, PF-04928473, was shown to promote PCa apoptosis by abrogating RANKL signaling and Src phosphorylation and inhibiting NF-κB, but also inhibiting osteoclastogenesis by similar mechanisms (170). As discussed above, IL-6 is important for osteoclast formation, but it has also been implicated in androgen responsiveness (171). An anti-IL-6 antibody, CNTO328, has been shown to inhibit subcutaneous tumor growth by promoting PCa apoptosis (123, 172). However, the role this therapy plays in bone has not been fully described although the therapy has shown promise in treating ovarian carcinoma, myeloma, and possibly PCa (173, 174). Gadolinium on the other hand can integrate into bone in exchange for calcium, and has been shown to suppress PCa growth and migration while inhibiting osteoclast differentiation (175). Although not yet identified for PCa, coptisine, a naturally occurring isoquinoline alkaloid, has shown efficacy for the inhibition of osteoclast function in normal bone through RANKL inhibition of osteoclast formation, and may hold promise as an anti-tumor therapeutic (176). There are a number of other therapies in development that have been significantly reviewed previously (60, 158). This is but a short list but shows the promise that many novel therapeutics hold for the treatment of this disease.

Conclusion

Prostate cancer skeletal metastases often have a lytic component underlying their osteoblastic phenotype. Several mechanisms are important in promotion of osteoclast development, and activation of osteolytic pathways leading to bone resorption. IL-6 has been shown to be an important mediator in differentiation of osteoclasts while mediation of the balance between RANKL and OPG is important in regulating bone resorption and osteoclast activity. It is important to continue investigation concerning the mechanisms by which prostate cancer cells illicit bone osteolysis and activation of osteoclasts for therapeutic gain. Much information concerning the interactions between PCa and osteoclasts is required. For example, many of the typical laboratory models fail to replicate the osteoblastic environment, yet many of them have strong osteolytic tendencies when analyzed in vitro and in vivo. Examination concerning the nature of these cell lines is important, and may yield greater context to the underlying pathobiology of PCa as is reflected in the osteolytic bone microenvironment of metastases. Our understanding of PCa biology and the role that osteoclasts play can help define novel targets. Novel therapeutics aimed at presently known targets, and those now under development should yield important insight into the inhibition of PCa growth. For example, the role that PTHrP plays in regulating RANKL expression in osteoblasts as a subsequent regulator of osteoclasts is relatively difficult and poorly understood. Increased description of these pathways may yield useful therapeutic developments for patients with advanced disease. Current clinical trials seek to define the role that novel therapeutics play in the inhibition of PCa bone lysis to improve patient quality of life and increase survival. Continued investigation into the biology of the metastatic prostate tumor bone microenvironment will enable increased target definition, therapeutic development, and inhibition of the pain associated with these tumors.

Summary.

Bone metastasis is a painful and frequent complication of advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Although a majority of bone metastases are considered osteoblastic, many of these tumors have an underlying osteolytic component. Herein, we describe the primary players involved in the bone microenvironment that contribute to osteolysis and the promotion of tumor growth. Examination of osteoclast biology, important cytokines such as receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) are defined, and interactions between osteoclasts and prostate cancer cells described. Novel therapeutics have been developed to inhibit osteoclastic processes and applied to the prostate cancer scenario with recent developments associated with these therapies examined. This review seeks to describe the field of osteolysis in advanced prostate cancer bone metastases and explore current thinking to inhibit metastatic growth to enhance quality of life and prolong survival in this cohort of patients.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH Grant CA093900.

List of Abbreviations

2-DG

2 Deoxy glucose

ALP

Alkaline Phosphatase

BMD

Bone Mineral Density

BMP

Bone morphogenetic protein

CFU-GM

Colony forming unit granulocyte-macrophage

CSF-1

Colony stimulating factor 1

CTx

C-telopeptide

ECM

Extracellular Matrix

FEO

Familial expansile osteolysis

JAK

Janus activated protein kinase

IL

Interleukin

IL-6R

Interleukin-6 receptor

LIF

Leukemia inhibitory factor

MAP

Mitogen activated protein

MAPK

Mitogen activated protein kinase

MCP-1

Monocyte chemotactic protein - 1

M-CSF

macrophage colony stimulating factor

MM

Multiple Myeloma

MMP

Matrix Metalloproteinase

NTx

N-telopeptide

OC

Osteocalcin

OCIF

osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor

OPG

Osteoprotegerin

PBMC

Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell

PCa

Prostate Cancer

PTH

Parathyroid Hormone

PTH1R

Parathyroid hormone receptor-1

PTHrP

Parathyroid hormone-related protein

RANK

Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B

RANKL

Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand

SRE

Skeletally Related Event

TACE

Tumor necrosis factor converting enzyme

TNF-α

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

TRAP5b

Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

References

  • 1.Carlin BI, Andriole GL. The natural history, skeletal complications, and management of bone metastases in patients with prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2000 Jun 15;88(12 Suppl):2989–94. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12+<2989::aid-cncr14>3.3.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Keller ET, Brown J. Prostate cancer bone metastases promote both osteolytic and osteoblastic activity. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2004 Mar 1;91(4):718–29. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Roato I, D’Amelio P, Gorassini E, et al. Osteoclasts are active in bone forming metastases of prostate cancer patients. PloS one. 2008;3(11):e3627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ignatoski KM, Friedman J, Escara-Wilke J, et al. Change in markers of bone metabolism with chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer: interleukin-6 response is a potential early indicator of response to therapy. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2009 Feb;29(2):105–12. doi: 10.1089/jir.2008.0024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roland SI. Calcium studies in ten cases of osteoblastic prostatic metastasis. The Journal of urology. 1958 Feb;79(2):339–42. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66278-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lynch CC, Hikosaka A, Acuff HB, et al. MMP-7 promotes prostate cancer-induced osteolysis via the solubilization of RANKL. Cancer cell. 2005 May;7(5):485–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Menaa C, Kurihara N, Roodman GD. CFU-GM-derived cells form osteoclasts at a very high efficiency. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2000 Jan 27;267(3):943–6. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.2042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003 May 15;423(6937):337–42. doi: 10.1038/nature01658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Roodman GD. Regulation of osteoclast differentiation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006 Apr;1068:100–9. doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abu-Amer Y. IL-4 abrogates osteoclastogenesis through STAT6-dependent inhibition of NF-kappaB. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2001 Jun;107(11):1375–85. doi: 10.1172/JCI10530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Takahashi N, Maeda K, Ishihara A, Uehara S, Kobayashi Y. Regulatory mechanism of osteoclastogenesis by RANKL and Wnt signals. Front Biosci. 2011;16:21–30. doi: 10.2741/3673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weilbaecher KN, Guise TA, McCauley LK. Cancer to bone: a fatal attraction. Nature reviews. 2011 Jun;11(6):411–25. doi: 10.1038/nrc3055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mundy GR, Yoneda T, Hiraga T. Preclinical studies with zoledronic acid and other bisphosphonates: impact on the bone microenvironment. Seminars in oncology. 2001 Apr;28(2 Suppl 6):35–44. doi: 10.1016/s0093-7754(01)90263-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Whyte MP, Mumm S. Heritable disorders of the RANKL/OPG/RANK signaling pathway. Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions. 2004 Sep;4(3):254–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brown JM, Corey E, Lee ZD, et al. Osteoprotegerin and rank ligand expression in prostate cancer. Urology. 2001 Apr;57(4):611–6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01122-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Castellano D, Sepulveda JM, Garcia-Escobar I, Rodriguez-Antolin A, Sundlov A, Cortes-Funes H. The role of RANK-ligand inhibition in cancer: the story of denosumab. The oncologist. 2011;16(2):136–45. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang J, Dai J, Qi Y, et al. Osteoprotegerin inhibits prostate cancer-induced osteoclastogenesis and prevents prostate tumor growth in the bone. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2001 May;107(10):1235–44. doi: 10.1172/JCI11685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ge C, Xiao G, Jiang D, et al. Identification and functional characterization of ERK/MAPK phosphorylation sites in the Runx2 transcription factor. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2009 Nov 20;284(47):32533–43. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.040980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jang WG, Kim EJ, Bae IH, et al. Metformin induces osteoblast differentiation via orphan nuclear receptor SHP-mediated transactivation of Runx2. Bone. 2011 Apr 1;48(4):885–93. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Akech J, Wixted JJ, Bedard K, et al. Runx2 association with progression of prostate cancer in patients: mechanisms mediating bone osteolysis and osteoblastic metastatic lesions. Oncogene. 2010 Feb 11;29(6):811–21. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Daniell HW. Osteoporosis due to androgen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2001 Aug;58(2 Suppl 1):101–7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01251-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stege R. Potential side-effects of endocrine treatment of long duration in prostate cancer. Prostate Suppl. 2000;10:38–42. doi: 10.1002/1097-0045(2000)45:10+<38::aid-pros8>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vessella RL, Corey E. Targeting factors involved in bone remodeling as treatment strategies in prostate cancer bone metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 15;12(20 Pt 2):6285s–90s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Higano C, Shields A, Wood N, Brown J, Tangen C. Bone mineral density in patients with prostate cancer without bone metastases treated with intermittent androgen suppression. Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1182–6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lyritis GP, Georgoulas T, Zafeiris CP. Bone anabolic versus bone anticatabolic treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2010 Sep;1205:277–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05666.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Halloran BP, Ferguson VL, Simske SJ, Burghardt A, Venton LL, Majumdar S. Changes in bone structure and mass with advancing age in the male C57BL/6J mouse. J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Jun;17(6):1044–50. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.6.1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Salo J, Lehenkari P, Mulari M, Metsikko K, Vaananen HK. Removal of osteoclast bone resorption products by transcytosis. Science (New York, NY. 1997 Apr 11;276(5310):270–3. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5310.270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stenbeck G, Horton MA. Endocytic trafficking in actively resorbing osteoclasts. Journal of cell science. 2004 Feb 29;117(Pt 6):827–36. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Teitelbaum SL, Ross FP. Genetic regulation of osteoclast development and function. Nat Rev Genet. 2003 Aug;4(8):638–49. doi: 10.1038/nrg1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cackowski FC, Anderson JL, Patrene KD, et al. Osteoclasts are important for bone angiogenesis. Blood. 2009 Jan 7;115(1):140–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-237628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fulciniti M, Hideshima T, Vermot-Desroches C, et al. A high-affinity fully human anti-IL-6 mAb, 1339, for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Dec 1;15(23):7144–52. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Morrissey C, True LD, Roudier MP, et al. Differential expression of angiogenesis associated genes in prostate cancer bone, liver and lymph node metastases. Clinical & experimental metastasis. 2008;25(4):377–88. doi: 10.1007/s10585-007-9116-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mizutani K, Sud S, Pienta KJ. Prostate cancer promotes CD11b positive cells to differentiate into osteoclasts. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2009 Mar 1;106(4):563–9. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shiozawa Y, Pedersen EA, Havens AM, et al. Human prostate cancer metastases target the hematopoietic stem cell niche to establish footholds in mouse bone marrow. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2011 Apr 1;121(4):1298–312. doi: 10.1172/JCI43414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shiozawa Y, Pienta KJ, Taichman RS. Hematopoietic stem cell niche is a potential therapeutic target for bone metastatic tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 15; doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Facchini G, Caraglia M, Morabito A, et al. Metronomic administration of zoledronic acid and taxotere combination in castration resistant prostate cancer patients: phase I ZANTE trial. Cancer biology & therapy. 2011 Sep;10(6):543–8. doi: 10.4161/cbt.10.6.12611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Huang CF, Lira C, Chu K, et al. Cadherin-11 increases migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells and enhances their interaction with osteoblasts. Cancer research. 2010 Jun 1;70(11):4580–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sabbota AL, Kim HR, Zhe X, Fridman R, Bonfil RD, Cher ML. Shedding of RANKL by tumor-associated MT1-MMP activates Src-dependent prostate cancer cell migration. Cancer research. 2010 Jul 1;70(13):5558–66. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang Q, Diao X, Sun J, Chen Z. Regulation of VEGF, MMP-9, and metastasis by CXCR4 in a prostate cancer cell line. Cell biology international. 2011 Feb 10; doi: 10.1042/CBI20100744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hall CL, Dai J, van Golen KL, Keller ET, Long MW. Type I collagen receptor (alpha 2 beta 1) signaling promotes the growth of human prostate cancer cells within the bone. Cancer research. 2006 Sep 1;66(17):8648–54. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hall CL, Dubyk CW, Riesenberger TA, Shein D, Keller ET, van Golen KL. Type I collagen receptor (alpha2beta1) signaling promotes prostate cancer invasion through RhoC GTPase. Neoplasia (New York, NY. 2008 Aug;10(8):797–803. doi: 10.1593/neo.08380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.McCarthy EF. Genetic diseases of bones and joints. Seminars in diagnostic pathology. 2011 Feb;28(1):26–36. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2011.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bekes EM, Schweighofer B, Kupriyanova TA, et al. Tumor-Recruited Neutrophils and Neutrophil TIMP-Free MMP-9 Regulate Coordinately the Levels of Tumor Angiogenesis and Efficiency of Malignant Cell Intravasation. The American journal of pathology. 2011 Jul 8; doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tapia T, Ottman R, Chakrabarti R. LIM kinase1 modulates function of membrane type matrix metalloproteinase 1: implication in invasion of prostate cancer cells. Molecular cancer. 2011;10:6. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xu D, McKee CM, Cao Y, Ding Y, Kessler BM, Muschel RJ. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 regulates tumor cell invasion through cleavage of protease nexin-1. Cancer research. 2010 Sep 1;70(17):6988–98. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Keller ET. The role of osteoclastic activity in prostate cancer skeletal metastases. Drugs Today (Barc) 2002 Feb;38(2):91–102. doi: 10.1358/dot.2002.38.2.820105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nemeth JA, Yousif R, Herzog M, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase activity, bone matrix turnover, and tumor cell proliferation in prostate cancer bone metastasis. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002 Jan 2;94(1):17–25. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hou P, Troen T, Ovejero MC, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-12 (MMP-12) in osteoclasts: new lesson on the involvement of MMPs in bone resorption. Bone. 2004 Jan;34(1):37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Radding W, Williams JP, Hardy RW, et al. Calmodulin concentrated at the osteoclast ruffled border modulates acid secretion. Journal of cellular physiology. 1994 Jul;160(1):17–28. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041600104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Terpos E. Biochemical markers of bone metabolism in multiple myeloma. Cancer treatment reviews. 2006;32(Suppl 1):15–9. doi: 10.1016/s0305-7372(06)80004-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lalande A, Roux S, Denne MA, et al. Indapamide, a thiazide-like diuretic, decreases bone resorption in vitro. J Bone Miner Res. 2001 Feb;16(2):361–70. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.2.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lehenkari P, Hentunen TA, Laitala-Leinonen T, Tuukkanen J, Vaananen HK. Carbonic anhydrase II plays a major role in osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption by effecting the steady state intracellular pH and Ca2+ Experimental cell research. 1998 Jul 10;242(1):128–37. doi: 10.1006/excr.1998.4071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tuukkanen J, Vaananen HK. Omeprazole, a specific inhibitor of H+-K+-ATPase, inhibits bone resorption in vitro. Calcified tissue international. 1986 Feb;38(2):123–5. doi: 10.1007/BF02556841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Farina C, Gagliardi S. Selective inhibition of osteoclast vacuolar H(+)-ATPase. Current pharmaceutical design. 2002;8(23):2033–48. doi: 10.2174/1381612023393369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yang YX, Lewis JD, Epstein S, Metz DC. Long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy and risk of hip fracture. Jama. 2006 Dec 27;296(24):2947–53. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.24.2947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Coluzzi F, Di Bussolo E, Mandatori I, Mattia C. Bone metastatic disease: taking aim at new therapeutic targets. Current medicinal chemistry. 2011;18(20):3093–115. doi: 10.2174/092986711796391660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Leto G, Sepporta MV, Crescimanno M, Flandina C, Tumminello FM. Cathepsin L in metastatic bone disease: therapeutic implications. Biological chemistry. 2010 Jun;391(6):655–64. doi: 10.1515/BC.2010.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Miyauchi Y, Ninomiya K, Miyamoto H, et al. The Blimp1-Bcl6 axis is critical to regulate osteoclast differentiation and bone homeostasis. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2010 Apr 12;207(4):751–62. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sturge J, Caley MP, Waxman J. Bone metastasis in prostate cancer: emerging therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun;8(6):357–68. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tumminello FM, Flandina C, Crescimanno M, Leto G. Circulating cathepsin K and cystatin C in patients with cancer related bone disease: clinical and therapeutic implications. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie. 2008 Feb;62(2):130–5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Podgorski I, Linebaugh BE, Koblinski JE, et al. Bone marrow-derived cathepsin K cleaves SPARC in bone metastasis. The American journal of pathology. 2009 Sep;175(3):1255–69. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Brubaker KD, Vessella RL, True LD, Thomas R, Corey E. Cathepsin K mRNA and protein expression in prostate cancer progression. J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Feb;18(2):222–30. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.2.222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Troen BR. The regulation of cathepsin K gene expression. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006 Apr;1068:165–72. doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Vallet S, Mukherjee S, Vaghela N, et al. Activin A promotes multiple myeloma-induced osteolysis and is a promising target for myeloma bone disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010 Mar 16;107(11):5124–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911929107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Amuthan G, Biswas G, Ananadatheerthavarada HK, Vijayasarathy C, Shephard HM, Avadhani NG. Mitochondrial stress-induced calcium signaling, phenotypic changes and invasive behavior in human lung carcinoma A549 cells. Oncogene. 2002 Nov 7;21(51):7839–49. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Amuthan G, Biswas G, Zhang SY, Klein-Szanto A, Vijayasarathy C, Avadhani NG. Mitochondria-to-nucleus stress signaling induces phenotypic changes, tumor progression and cell invasion. The EMBO journal. 2001 Apr 17;20(8):1910–20. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.8.1910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Duong LT. Therapeutic inhibition of cathepsin K[mdash]reducing bone resorption while maintaining bone formation. BoneKEy Rep. 2012;1(5) doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2012.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Dougall WC, Chaisson M. The RANK/RANKL/OPG triad in cancer-induced bone diseases. Cancer metastasis reviews. 2006 Dec;25(4):541–9. doi: 10.1007/s10555-006-9021-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Burgess TL, Qian Y, Kaufman S, et al. The ligand for osteoprotegerin (OPGL) directly activates mature osteoclasts. The Journal of cell biology. 1999 May 3;145(3):527–38. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.3.527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lacey DL, Tan HL, Lu J, et al. Osteoprotegerin ligand modulates murine osteoclast survival in vitro and in vivo. The American journal of pathology. 2000 Aug;157(2):435–48. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64556-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, et al. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell. 1998 Apr 17;93(2):165–76. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81569-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Matsuzaki K, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, et al. Osteoclast differentiation factor (ODF) induces osteoclast-like cell formation in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1998 May 8;246(1):199–204. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.O’Brien EA, Williams JH, Marshall MJ. Osteoprotegerin ligand regulates osteoclast adherence to the bone surface in mouse calvaria. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2000 Aug 2;274(2):281–90. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Tsurukai T, Udagawa N, Matsuzaki K, Takahashi N, Suda T. Roles of macrophage-colony stimulating factor and osteoclast differentiation factor in osteoclastogenesis. Journal of bone and mineral metabolism. 2000;18(4):177–84. doi: 10.1007/s007740070018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Suzuki J, Ikeda T, Kuroyama H, et al. Regulation of osteoclastogenesis by three human RANKL isoforms expressed in NIH3T3 cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2004 Feb 20;314(4):1021–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.12.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tat SK, Pelletier JP, Velasco CR, Padrines M, Martel-Pelletier J. New perspective in osteoarthritis: the OPG and RANKL system as a potential therapeutic target? The Keio journal of medicine. 2009 Mar;58(1):29–40. doi: 10.2302/kjm.58.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lum L, Wong BR, Josien R, et al. Evidence for a role of a tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)-converting enzyme-like protease in shedding of TRANCE, a TNF family member involved in osteoclastogenesis and dendritic cell survival. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1999 May 7;274(19):13613–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.19.13613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ikeda T, Kasai M, Suzuki J, et al. Multimerization of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL) isoforms and regulation of osteoclastogenesis. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003 Nov 21;278(47):47217–22. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304636200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Miyazaki T, Tanaka S, Sanjay A, Baron R. The role of c-Src kinase in the regulation of osteoclast function. Modern rheumatology / the Japan Rheumatism Association. 2006;16(2):68–74. doi: 10.1007/s10165-006-0460-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Takatsuna H, Asagiri M, Kubota T, et al. Inhibition of RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis by (-)-DHMEQ, a novel NF-kappaB inhibitor, through downregulation of NFATc1. J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Apr;20(4):653–62. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.041213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Raju R, Balakrishnan L, Nanjappa V, et al. A comprehensive manually curated reaction map of RANKL/RANK-signaling pathway. Database (Oxford) 2011:bar021. doi: 10.1093/database/bar021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bozec A, Bakiri L, Hoebertz A, et al. Osteoclast size is controlled by Fra-2 through LIF/LIF-receptor signalling and hypoxia. Nature. 2008 Jul 10;454(7201):221–5. doi: 10.1038/nature07019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Matsuo K, Owens JM, Tonko M, Elliott C, Chambers TJ, Wagner EF. Fosl1 is a transcriptional target of c-Fos during osteoclast differentiation. Nature genetics. 2000 Feb;24(2):184–7. doi: 10.1038/72855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Armstrong AP, Miller RE, Jones JC, Zhang J, Keller ET, Dougall WC. RANKL acts directly on RANK-expressing prostate tumor cells and mediates migration and expression of tumor metastasis genes. The Prostate. 2008 Jan 1;68(1):92–104. doi: 10.1002/pros.20678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Inoue H, Nishimura K, Oka D, et al. Prostate cancer mediates osteoclastogenesis through two different pathways. Cancer letters. 2005 Jun 1;223(1):121–8. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ibrahim T, Sacanna E, Gaudio M, et al. Role of RANK, RANKL, OPG, and CXCR4 Tissue Markers in Predicting Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients. Clinical breast cancer. 2011 Jul 15; doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tan W, Zhang W, Strasner A, et al. Tumour-infiltrating regulatory T cells stimulate mammary cancer metastasis through RANKL-RANK signalling. Nature. 2011 Feb 24;470(7335):548–53. doi: 10.1038/nature09707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wittrant Y, Theoleyre S, Chipoy C, et al. RANKL/RANK/OPG: new therapeutic targets in bone tumours and associated osteolysis. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2004 Sep 20;1704(2):49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2004.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Won HY, Lee JA, Park ZS, et al. Prominent bone loss mediated by RANKL and IL-17 produced by CD4+ T cells in TallyHo/JngJ mice. PloS one. 2011;6(3):e18168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Yamada A, Takami M, Kawawa T, et al. Interleukin-4 inhibition of osteoclast differentiation is stronger than that of interleukin-13 and they are equivalent for induction of osteoprotegerin production from osteoblasts. Immunology. 2007 Apr;120(4):573–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02538.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Hofbauer LC, Heufelder AE. Role of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand and osteoprotegerin in bone cell biology. Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) 2001 Jun;79(5–6):243–53. doi: 10.1007/s001090100226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Bucay N, Sarosi I, Dunstan CR, et al. osteoprotegerin-deficient mice develop early onset osteoporosis and arterial calcification. Genes & development. 1998 May 1;12(9):1260–8. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.9.1260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Baron R, Ferrari S, Russell RG. Denosumab and bisphosphonates: different mechanisms of action and effects. Bone. 2010 Apr 1;48(4):677–92. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Zinonos I, Labrinidis A, Lee M, et al. Anticancer efficacy of Apo2L/TRAIL is retained in the presence of high and biologically active concentrations of osteoprotegerin in vivo. J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Mar;26(3):630–43. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Bateman TA, Dunstan CR, Ferguson VL, Lacey DL, Ayers RA, Simske SJ. Osteoprotegerin mitigates tail suspension-induced osteopenia. Bone. 2000 May;26(5):443–9. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00256-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Chen H, Gilbert LC, Lu X, et al. A new regulator of osteoclastogenesis: Estrogen response element binding protein in bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Jul 19; doi: 10.1002/jbmr.456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Zheng Y, Zhou H, Ooi LL, Snir AD, Dunstan CR, Seibel MJ. Vitamin D deficiency promotes prostate cancer growth in bone. The Prostate. 2011 Jun 15;71(9):1012–21. doi: 10.1002/pros.21316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Fili S, Karalaki M, Schaller B. Therapeutic implications of osteoprotegerin. Cancer cell international. 2009;9:26. doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-9-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kamiya N, Suzuki H, Endo T, et al. Significance of serum osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand in Japanese prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis. International journal of clinical oncology / Japan Society of Clinical Oncology. 2011 Feb 16; doi: 10.1007/s10147-011-0193-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Santini D, Perrone G, Roato I, et al. Expression pattern of receptor activator of NFkappaB (RANK) in a series of primary solid tumors and related bone metastases. Journal of cellular physiology. 2010 Mar;226(3):780–4. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Corey E, Brown LG, Kiefer JA, et al. Osteoprotegerin in prostate cancer bone metastasis. Cancer research. 2005 Mar 1;65(5):1710–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Blanchard F, Duplomb L, Baud’huin M, Brounais B. The dual role of IL-6-type cytokines on bone remodeling and bone tumors. Cytokine & growth factor reviews. 2009 Feb;20(1):19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2008.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Sims NA, Walsh NC. GP130 cytokines and bone remodelling in health and disease. BMB reports. 2010 Aug;43(8):513–23. doi: 10.5483/bmbrep.2010.43.8.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Taga T, Kishimoto T. Gp130 and the interleukin-6 family of cytokines. Annual review of immunology. 1997;15:797–819. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet. 2011 Mar 5;377(9768):813–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62344-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Bishop KA, Meyer MB, Pike JW. A novel distal enhancer mediates cytokine induction of mouse RANKl gene expression. Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md) 2009 Dec;23(12):2095–110. doi: 10.1210/me.2009-0209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Duplomb L, Baud’huin M, Charrier C, et al. Interleukin-6 inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand-induced osteoclastogenesis by diverting cells into the macrophage lineage: key role of Serine727 phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3. Endocrinology. 2008 Jul;149(7):3688–97. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Itoh S, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, et al. A critical role for interleukin-6 family-mediated Stat3 activation in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Bone. 2006 Sep;39(3):505–12. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.02.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zhou H, Newnum AB, Martin JR, et al. Osteoblast/osteocyte-specific inactivation of Stat3 decreases load-driven bone formation and accumulates reactive oxygen species. Bone. 2011 Sep;49(3):404–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Morrissey C, Lai JS, Brown LG, et al. The expression of osteoclastogenesis-associated factors and osteoblast response to osteolytic prostate cancer cells. The Prostate. 2010 Mar 1;70(4):412–24. doi: 10.1002/pros.21075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Axmann R, Bohm C, Kronke G, Zwerina J, Smolen J, Schett G. Inhibition of interleukin-6 receptor directly blocks osteoclast formation in vitro and in vivo. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2009 Sep;60(9):2747–56. doi: 10.1002/art.24781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Yoshitake F, Itoh S, Narita H, Ishihara K, Ebisu S. Interleukin-6 directly inhibits osteoclast differentiation by suppressing receptor activator of NF-kappaB signaling pathways. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2008 Apr 25;283(17):11535–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M607999200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Adler HL, McCurdy MA, Kattan MW, Timme TL, Scardino PT, Thompson TC. Elevated levels of circulating interleukin-6 and transforming growth factor-beta1 in patients with metastatic prostatic carcinoma. The Journal of urology. 1999 Jan;161(1):182–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Corcoran NM, Costello AJ. Interleukin-6: minor player or starring role in the development of hormone-refractory prostate cancer? BJU international. 2003 Apr;91(6):545–53. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04025.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Cardillo MR, Ippoliti F. IL-6, IL-10 and HSP-90 expression in tissue microarrays from human prostate cancer assessed by computer-assisted image analysis. Anticancer research. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5A):3409–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Lu Y, Zhang J, Dai J, et al. Osteoblasts induce prostate cancer proliferation and PSA expression through interleukin-6-mediated activation of the androgen receptor. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2004;21(5):399–408. doi: 10.1007/s10585-005-0056-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Singh S, Singh R, Sharma PK, et al. Serum CXCL13 positively correlates with prostatic disease, prostate-specific antigen and mediates prostate cancer cell invasion, integrin clustering and cell adhesion. Cancer letters. 2009 Sep 28;283(1):29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.03.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kim SW, Kim JS, Papadopoulos J, et al. Consistent interactions between tumor cell IL-6 and macrophage TNF-alpha enhance the growth of human prostate cancer cells in the bone of nude mouse. International immunopharmacology. 2011 Jul;11(7):862–72. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Inokuchi J, Lau A, Tyson DR, Ornstein DK. Loss of annexin A1 disrupts normal prostate glandular structure by inducing autocrine IL-6 signaling. Carcinogenesis. 2009 Jul;30(7):1082–8. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Hodge DR, Hurt EM, Farrar WL. The role of IL-6 and STAT3 in inflammation and cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005 Nov;41(16):2502–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Paule B, Terry S, Kheuang L, Soyeux P, Vacherot F, de la Taille A. The NF-kappaB/IL-6 pathway in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer: new therapeutic approaches? World journal of urology. 2007 Oct;25(5):477–89. doi: 10.1007/s00345-007-0175-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Smith PC, Keller ET. Anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody induces regression of human prostate cancer xenografts in nude mice. The Prostate. 2001 Jun 15;48(1):47–53. doi: 10.1002/pros.1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Giuliani N, Colla S, Rizzoli V. New insight in the mechanism of osteoclast activation and formation in multiple myeloma: focus on the receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) Experimental hematology. 2004 Aug;32(8):685–91. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2004.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Han JH, Choi SJ, Kurihara N, Koide M, Oba Y, Roodman GD. Macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha is an osteoclastogenic factor in myeloma that is independent of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand. Blood. 2001 Jun 1;97(11):3349–53. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.11.3349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Pirih FQ, Michalski MN, Cho SW, et al. Parathyroid hormone mediates hematopoietic cell expansion through interleukin-6. PloS one. 2010;5(10):e13657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Sterling JA, Edwards JR, Martin TJ, Mundy GR. Advances in the biology of bone metastasis: how the skeleton affects tumor behavior. Bone. 2011 Jan;48(1):6–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Toribio RE, Brown HA, Novince CM, et al. The midregion, nuclear localization sequence, and C terminus of PTHrP regulate skeletal development, hematopoiesis, and survival in mice. Faseb J. 2010 Jun;24(6):1947–57. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-147033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Liao J, McCauley LK. Skeletal metastasis: Established and emerging roles of parathyroid hormone related protein (PTHrP) Cancer metastasis reviews. 2006 Dec;25(4):559–71. doi: 10.1007/s10555-006-9033-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Mannstadt M, Juppner H, Gardella TJ. Receptors for PTH and PTHrP: their biological importance and functional properties. The American journal of physiology. 1999 Nov;277(5 Pt 2):F665–75. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1999.277.5.F665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Burtis WJ, Wu T, Bunch C, et al. Identification of a novel 17,000-dalton parathyroid hormone-like adenylate cyclase-stimulating protein from a tumor associated with humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1987 May 25;262(15):7151–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Kayamori K, Sakamoto K, Nakashima T, et al. Roles of interleukin-6 and parathyroid hormone-related peptide in osteoclast formation associated with oral cancers: significance of interleukin-6 synthesized by stromal cells in response to cancer cells. The American journal of pathology. 2010 Feb;176(2):968–80. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Bhatia V, Mula RV, Falzon M. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) regulates PTHrP expression via transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational pathways. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2011 Aug 6;342(1–2):32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.05.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Liu XH, Kirschenbaum A, Yao S, Levine AC. The role of the interleukin-6/gp130 signaling pathway in bone metabolism. Vitamins and hormones. 2006;74:341–55. doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(06)74014-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Liu XH, Kirschenbaum A, Yao S, Levine AC. Interactive effect of interleukin-6 and prostaglandin E2 on osteoclastogenesis via the OPG/RANKL/RANK system. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006 Apr;1068:225–33. doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Amizuka N, Karaplis AC, Henderson JE, et al. Haploinsufficiency of parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) results in abnormal postnatal bone development. Developmental biology. 1996 Apr 10;175(1):166–76. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Miao D, He B, Jiang Y, et al. Osteoblast-derived PTHrP is a potent endogenous bone anabolic agent that modifies the therapeutic efficacy of administered PTH 1–34. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2005 Sep;115(9):2402–11. doi: 10.1172/JCI24918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Asadi F, Farraj M, Sharifi R, Malakouti S, Antar S, Kukreja S. Enhanced expression of parathyroid hormone-related protein in prostate cancer as compared with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Human pathology. 1996 Dec;27(12):1319–23. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(96)90344-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Lu Y, Xiao G, Galson DL, et al. PTHrP-induced MCP-1 production by human bone marrow endothelial cells and osteoblasts promotes osteoclast differentiation and prostate cancer cell proliferation and invasion in vitro. International journal of cancer. 2007 Aug 15;121(4):724–33. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Mizutani K, Sud S, McGregor NA, et al. The chemokine CCL2 increases prostate tumor growth and bone metastasis through macrophage and osteoclast recruitment. Neoplasia (New York, NY. 2009 Nov;11(11):1235–42. doi: 10.1593/neo.09988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Sun T, Mary LG, Oh WK, et al. Inherited variants in the chemokine CCL2 gene and prostate cancer aggressiveness in a Caucasian cohort. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Mar 15;17(6):1546–52. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Liao J, Li X, Koh AJ, et al. Tumor expressed PTHrP facilitates prostate cancer-induced osteoblastic lesions. International journal of cancer. 2008 Nov 15;123(10):2267–78. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Asadi FK, Kukreja SC, Boyer B, Valess AM, Cook JL. E1A oncogene expression inhibits PTHrP P3 promoter activity and sensitizes human prostate cancer cells to TNF-induced apoptosis. International urology and nephrology. 2010 Dec;42(4):971–8. doi: 10.1007/s11255-009-9699-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.DaSilva J, Gioeli D, Weber MJ, Parsons SJ. The neuroendocrine-derived peptide parathyroid hormone-related protein promotes prostate cancer cell growth by stabilizing the androgen receptor. Cancer research. 2009 Sep 15;69(18):7402–11. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Liao J, Schneider A, Datta NS, McCauley LK. Extracellular calcium as a candidate mediator of prostate cancer skeletal metastasis. Cancer research. 2006 Sep 15;66(18):9065–73. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Tenta R, Sourla A, Lembessis P, Luu-The V, Koutsilieris M. Bone microenvironment-related growth factors, zoledronic acid and dexamethasone differentially modulate PTHrP expression in PC-3 prostate cancer cells. Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2005 Oct;37(10):593–601. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Pettway GJ, Meganck JA, Koh AJ, Keller ET, Goldstein SA, McCauley LK. Parathyroid hormone mediates bone growth through the regulation of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. Bone. 2008 Apr;42(4):806–18. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.11.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Lipton A, Goessl C. Clinical development of anti-RANKL therapies for treatment and prevention of bone metastasis. Bone. 2011 Jan;48(1):96–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.10.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Henry DH, Costa L, Goldwasser F, et al. Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 20;29(9):1125–32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.3304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Weintraub B. Trials define anti-tumor effects of anti-resorptive agents: denosumab ahead of zoledronate 2 to 1. BioDrugs. 2011 Apr 1;25(2):135–8. doi: 10.2165/11590730-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Aljumaily R, Mathew P. Optimal management of bone metastases in prostate cancer. Current oncology reports. 2011 Jun;13(3):222–30. doi: 10.1007/s11912-011-0160-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Fizazi K, Bosserman L, Gao G, Skacel T, Markus R. Denosumab treatment of prostate cancer with bone metastases and increased urine N-telopeptide levels after therapy with intravenous bisphosphonates: results of a randomized phase II trial. The Journal of urology. 2009 Aug;182(2):509–15. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.04.023. discussion 15–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Fizazi K, Lipton A, Mariette X, et al. Randomized phase II trial of denosumab in patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer, breast cancer, or other neoplasms after intravenous bisphosphonates. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 1;27(10):1564–71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.2146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Weinstein RS, Chen JR, Powers CC, et al. Promotion of osteoclast survival and antagonism of bisphosphonate-induced osteoclast apoptosis by glucocorticoids. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2002 Apr;109(8):1041–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI14538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Hussein O, Tiedemann K, Komarova SV. Breast cancer cells inhibit spontaneous and bisphosphonate-induced osteoclast apoptosis. Bone. 2011 Feb;48(2):202–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Hung TT, Chan J, Russell PJ, Power CA. Zoledronic acid preserves bone structure and increases survival but does not limit tumour incidence in a prostate cancer bone metastasis model. PloS one. 2011;6(5):e19389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Quinn JE, Brown LG, Zhang J, Keller ET, Vessella RL, Corey E. Comparison of Fc-osteoprotegerin and zoledronic acid activities suggests that zoledronic acid inhibits prostate cancer in bone by indirect mechanisms. Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases. 2005;8(3):253–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Sonpavde G, Sternberg CN. Contemporary management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Current opinion in urology. 2011 May;21(3):241–7. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283449e19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Prevarskaya N, Skryma R, Shuba Y. Ca2+ homeostasis in apoptotic resistance of prostate cancer cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2004 Oct 1;322(4):1326–35. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Prevarskaya N, Skryma R, Shuba Y. Calcium in tumour metastasis: new roles for known actors. Nature reviews. 2011;11(8):609–18. doi: 10.1038/nrc3105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Li X, Liao J, Park SI, et al. Drugs which inhibit osteoclast function suppress tumor growth through calcium reduction in bone. Bone. 2011 Jun 1;48(6):1354–61. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.03.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Annabi B, Bouzeghrane M, Currie JC, et al. Inhibition of MMP-9 secretion by the anti-metastatic PSP94-derived peptide PCK3145 requires cell surface laminin receptor signaling. Anti-cancer drugs. 2006 Apr;17(4):429–38. doi: 10.1097/01.cad.0000203388.68034.06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Chinni SR, Sivalogan S, Dong Z, et al. CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling activates Akt-1 and MMP-9 expression in prostate cancer cells: the role of bone microenvironment-associated CXCL12. The Prostate. 2006 Jan 1;66(1):32–48. doi: 10.1002/pros.20318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Li Y, Kucuk O, Hussain M, Abrams J, Cher ML, Sarkar FH. Antitumor and antimetastatic activities of docetaxel are enhanced by genistein through regulation of osteoprotegerin/receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK)/RANK ligand/MMP-9 signaling in prostate cancer. Cancer research. 2006 May 1;66(9):4816–25. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Wu KJ, Zeng J, Zhu GD, et al. Silibinin inhibits prostate cancer invasion, motility and migration by suppressing vimentin and MMP-2 expression. Acta pharmacologica Sinica. 2009 Aug;30(8):1162–8. doi: 10.1038/aps.2009.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Singh RP, Raina K, Deep G, Chan D, Agarwal R. Silibinin suppresses growth of human prostate carcinoma PC-3 orthotopic xenograft via activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and inhibition of signal transducers and activators of transcription signaling. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jan 15;15(2):613–21. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Barrett JM, Rovedo MA, Tajuddin AM, et al. Prostate cancer cells regulate growth and differentiation of bone marrow endothelial cells through TGFbeta and its receptor, TGFbetaRII. The Prostate. 2006 May 1;66(6):632–50. doi: 10.1002/pros.20370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Niu Y, Altuwaijri S, Lai KP, et al. Androgen receptor is a tumor suppressor and proliferator in prostate cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008 Aug 26;105(34):12182–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804700105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Pratap J, Akech J, Wixted JJ, et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor, vorinostat, reduces tumor growth at the metastatic bone site and associated osteolysis, but promotes normal bone loss. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2010 Dec;9(12):3210–20. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Lamoureux F, Thomas C, Yin MJ, et al. A novel HSP90 inhibitor delays castrate-resistant prostate cancer without altering serum PSA levels and inhibits osteoclastogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Apr 15;17(8):2301–13. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Culig Z, Steiner H, Bartsch G, Hobisch A. Interleukin-6 regulation of prostate cancer cell growth. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2005 Jun 1;95(3):497–505. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Wallner L, Dai J, Escara-Wilke J, et al. Inhibition of interleukin-6 with CNTO328, an anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody, inhibits conversion of androgen-dependent prostate cancer to an androgen-independent phenotype in orchiectomized mice. Cancer research. 2006 Mar 15;66(6):3087–95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Ikeda H, Hideshima T, Fulciniti M, et al. The monoclonal antibody nBT062 conjugated to cytotoxic Maytansinoids has selective cytotoxicity against CD138-positive multiple myeloma cells in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jun 15;15(12):4028–37. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Voorhees PM, Chen Q, Kuhn DJ, et al. Inhibition of interleukin-6 signaling with CNTO 328 enhances the activity of bortezomib in preclinical models of multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Nov 1;13(21):6469–78. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Wang P, Zou X, Huang J, Zhang T. Gadolinium inhibits prostate cancer PC3 cell migration and suppresses osteoclast differentiation in vitro. Cell biology international. 2011 May 24; doi: 10.1042/CBI20100870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Lee JW, Iwahashi A, Hasegawa SI, et al. Coptisine inhibits RANKL-induced NF-kappaB phosphorylation in osteoclast precursors and suppresses function through the regulation of RANKL and OPG gene expression in osteoblastic cells. Journal of natural medicines. 2011 Jun 9; doi: 10.1007/s11418-011-0537-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES