Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Diagn Pathol. 2011 May;28(2):167–177. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2011.04.001

Molecular Pathogenesis of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Christof Schneider 1, Laura Pasqualucci 1,2, Riccardo Dalla-Favera 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC3562715  NIHMSID: NIHMS297995  PMID: 21842702

Abstract

Over the past years, substantial insight regarding the pathogenesis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has been obtained. Particularly, based on gene expression profile analysis this disease can be classified in distinct phenotypic subgroups and specific transcriptional programs have been identified. New technologies like next-generation whole genome/exome sequencing and genome wide SNP array analysis revealed novel lesions involved in the pathogenesis of this disease. This Review focuses on the diversity of genetic lesions found in the different subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Introduction

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of Non-Hodgkin-Lymphoma (NHL), accounting for about 40% of NHL cases 1. DLBCL is a heterogeneous disease with a highly variable clinical course, currently treated with combinations of immuno- and chemotherapy. Based on gene expression profile analysis, this single diagnostic category can be classified into distinct phenotypic subtypes, differing in molecular and clinical features and reflecting the origin from specific stages of B cell differentiation during the germinal center reaction 2. During the past decade, multiple recurrent genetic alterations associated with DLBCL have been identified. This review will provide a brief summary of the germinal center reaction as a basis to understand the biological heterogeneity of DLBCL, and then focus on individual genetic lesions contributing to the pathogenesis of this disease.

Most DLBCLs derive from Germinal Center B-cells

The germinal center (GC) is the site where B-cells undergo distinct genetic processes to generate high-affinity antibodies (Fig 1). GCs are formed by proliferating B-cells in secondary lymphoid tissues upon T-cell dependent antigen stimulation. Within the dark zone of the GC, which consists of highly proliferating centroblasts (CBs), the cells undergo somatic hypermutation (SHM) of the variable region of the immunoglobulin gene (IgV) 3-4. SHM produces primarily single nucleotide substitutions, but also deletions and duplications in the IgV heavy and light chain genes, resulting in the production of antibodies with high affinity for the antigen 3-5. SHM can also target a number of non-immunoglobulin genes in normal B-cells, for example the 5′ untranslated region of B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL-6) 6-8. SHM occurs via DNA strand breaks and requires activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), which initiates the process by converting deoxycytidines to uracils, which are then further processed by DNA repair enzymes, leading to the creation of abasic sites and error-prone repair 9-11.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The germinal center reaction

Upon T-cell dependent antigen stimulation, naïve B-cells migrate to secondary lymphoid organs, differentiate into centroblasts, and proliferate in the dark zone of the germinal centers. Within the dark zone, the centroblasts undergo somatic hypermutation (SHM), which introduces mostly single base-pair changes into the immunoglobulin variable region of the heavy and light chain locus, with the aim of increasing their affinity for the antigen. Centroblasts then move to the light zone, where they differentiate into centrocytes and undergo class-switch recombination (CSR). T-cells and follicular dendritic cells help to re-challenge the centrocytes with the antigen such that cells with a low-affinity immunoglobulin-receptor are eliminated by apoptosis, while a subset of centrocytes with high-affinity to the antigen are selected to differentiate further into memory B-cells or plasma cells.

The initiation and maintenance of the GC is dependant on BCL-6, a transcriptional repressor belonging to the BTB/POZ/ZincFinger family of transcription factors. BCL-6 is essential in the GC reaction, as evidenced by the observation that mice lacking BCL-6 cannot form GCs nor can produce high affinity antibodies 12-13. BCL-6 is highly expressed in CBs, where it directly binds to and represses more than 1200 genes, as recently identified through integrated biochemical, functional and bioinformatics approach 14. BCL-6 target genes are involved in a variety of signaling pathways that are important for the GC reaction, including: i) DNA damage response, ii) apoptosis iii) plasma cell differentiation, iv) B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling, v) CD40 signaling, vi) TNFβ signaling, vii) Interferon (INF) signaling, viii) Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling and ix) WNT signaling as well as x) T-cell mediated activation 14-22. Taken together, these data indicate that BCL-6 is essential for the rapid proliferation of CBs, while allowing GC B-cells to undergo DNA modifications without inducing an unwanted DNA-damage response. Furthermore, BCL-6 inhibits the expression of several transcription factors that are essential for plasma cell differentiation 14,17-18,23-24.

In the light zone of the germinal center, CBs differentiate into centrocytes (CCs), which are re-challenged by the antigen in order to allow the selection for B-cells that produce high-affinity antibodies, while cells with a low-affinity Ig-receptor are eliminated by apoptosis 25. Furthermore, CCs undergo class-switch recombination (CSR), an intrachromosomal DNA recombination event that confers distinct effector functions to the antibodies by changing their immunoglobulin class from IgD and IgM to IgG, IgA or IgE 26. CSR occurs via non-homologous end-joining and requires AID 27-28. Another critical process that is initiated in the light zone of the GCs is the differentiation of B-cells with high-affinity Ig-receptor into effector plasma cells or memory B-cells. The down-regulation of BCL-6 is essential to allow terminal B-cell differentiation, and is accomplished in these cells through at least two distinct mechanisms, i.e. activation of CD40 and stimulation of the BCR. CD40 activation via CD40 ligand, expressed on CD4+ T cells, leads to NF-κB-mediated activation of interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) and subsequent transcriptional silencing of BCL-6 29-30. The stimulation of the BCR promotes mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) mediated phosphorylation of BCL-6, followed by its ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation 5,25,31. Down-regulation of BCL-6, in turn, restores DNA-damage responses, arrests proliferation, and allows for the expression of positive-regulatory-domain-containing 1 (PRDM1/ BLIMP1) a transcription factor required for plasma cell differentiation 18,23.

All B-cell NHLs –with the exception of mantle-cell and lymphoblastic lymphoma – derive from either GC-cells or B-cells that have passed through the GC, as indicated by the fact that these lymphomas carry hypermutated IgV genes 32. In addition, two main mechanisms of genetic lesion in B-NHL, i.e. chromosomal translocations and aberrant somatic hypermutation (ASHM), occur as byproducts of AID-dependent DNA remodeling events that take place in the GC. The requirement for AID in GC-derived lymphomagenesis was recently confirmed by the analyses of transgenic mice where it was shown that GC-derived lymphomas do not develop in animals lacking AID 33.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtypes derive from distinct B-cell differentiation stages

DLBCL is remarkably diverse in both clinical presentation and outcome, likely reflecting its pathogenetic and biologic heterogeneity. Over the past decade, the usage of genome-wide expression profiling has not only allowed a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of this disease, but has also revealed a number of features associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome 2,34-38. According to similarities to the putative cell of origin, DLBCL can be divided into at least three different groups: i) germinal center B-cell like (GCB) DLBCL, which derives from centroblasts, ii) activated B-cell like (ABC) DLBCL, which resembles features of plasmablastic B-cells committed to terminal B cell differentiation, and iii) primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), presumably arising from thymic B-cells 36,39-40. However, 15-30% of DLBCL cannot be classified into any of the above subgroups 2,41. The cell-of-origin based classification has prognostic value, since ABC-DLBCL have a worse overall survival as compared to GCB-DLBCL, and respond less effectively to current therapeutic regimes, with cure rates of around 40% 35,42. Immunohistochemical markers have been shown to be able to discriminate the individual subgroups, and several of them –CD10, BCL-6, MUM1, BCL-2 and CYCLIN D2 – have been shown to be predictive of survival 40,43. The combination of CD10, MUM1 and BCL-6 can divide DLBCL in GCB-DLBCL and non-GCB-DLBCL with about 80% concordance with the GEP 40. A combination of 5 makers –GCTE1, CD10, BCL-6, MUM1 and FOXP1– can achieve about 90% concordance with the GEP 44. In addition to the difference in cell of origin, these subgroups are associated with diverse genetic alterations (see below), suggesting that they depend on distinct oncogenic programs.

A separate classification scheme using gene-set enrichment analyses identified three phenotypic subsets characterized by the expression of genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos), B-cell receptor signaling (BCR) and host inflammatory response (HR) 37. Tumors in the latter subset show increased expression of macrophage/dendritic cell markers, T/natural killer cell receptor and activation pathway components, as well as complement cascade members, and inflammatory mediators, suggesting an increased inflammatory response 37. In HR tumors an increased number of infiltrating T cells and dendritic cells was found. Despite the increased immune response, these tumors do not have a favorable clinical outcome 37.

Mechanisms of genetic alteration in DLBCL

Genetic alterations found in NHLs and in DLBCL in particular, include chromosomal translocations, mutations caused by ASHM, sporadic somatic mutations and copy number alterations, denoted by deletions and amplifications.

Chromosomal translocations in NHLs represent reciprocal and balanced recombination events frequently but not exclusively involving the immunoglobulin locus, with the breakpoint either located in the switch region or in the target region of SHM 45-46. With very few exceptions, NHL-associated translocations do not lead to gene fusions, but cause dysregulated expression of the target gene. Given its critical function in both CSR and SHM, AID has been suggested to contribute to B-cell lymphomagenesis by facilitating the occurrence of chromosomal translocations and ASHM. Indeed, a direct role for AID in the development of GC-derived lymphomas has been demonstrated in mice 33,47.

The term ASHM defines a mechanism of genetic lesion resulting from the aberrant activity of the physiologic SHM machinery, as strongly suggested by the features of the observed mutations – specifically, the pattern of nucleotide exchanges, the requirement of transcription, and the distribution within 2kb from the transcription initiation site 48. By introducing mutations in the 5′ regulatory region of multiple genes, including coding sequences, ASHM is believed to play a major role in lymphomagenesis by causing deregulated expression of the target genes (often represented by proto-oncogenes) or by altering their protein function 48,49,50. ASHM is primarily found in DLBCL, with more than 50% of cases affected 48,51. Among the target genes identified so far are the well known proto-oncogenes MYC and PIM1 48.

In addition to chromosomal translocations and ASHM, altered gene expression in DLBCL can be caused by copy number alterations or somatic point mutations, analogous to non-lymphoid tumors. With the advent of novel techniques such as genome wide SNP array analysis and next-generation whole exome/genome sequencing analysis, novel lesions are likely to be identified. Recent examples include mutations and deletions of CREBBP and EP300, which are result in defective histone and non-histone protein acetylation in a significant fraction of DLBCL and FL (see below) 52.

Genetic Lesions associated with GCB-DLBCL

The gene expression pattern of GCB-DLBCL is similar to that of normal GC-B-cells 2. In addition, these tumors retain typical features of normal GC-B-cells such as CSR and SHM 53. GCB-DLBCLs are characterized by several, different genetic alterations (Tab. 1).

Table 1.

Genetic lesions associated with different subtypes of DLBCL.

GCB-DLBCL
GENE GENETIC
ALTERATION
FUNCTIONAL CONSEQUENCES BIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES REFERENCES
BCL2 t(14;18)
Mutations
Ectopic BCL2 expression
Escape from BCL6-mediated repression
Inhibition of apoptosis Weiss et al. 1987
Ci et al. 2009
Saito et al. 2009
Rosenwald et al. 2002
MYC t(8;14)
t(2;8)
t(8;22)
Ectopic expression
Escape from BCL6-mediated repression
Enhanced proliferation and survival Kramer at al. 1998
EZH2 activating mutations Increase in histone H3K27 trimethylation Epigenetic reprogramming Morin et al. 2010
MLL2 inactivating mutations Decrease in histone H3K4 trimethylation Epigenetic reprogramming Morin et al. 2010
Mendez-Largo et al. 2010
MEF2B point mutations unknown unknown Morin et al. 2010
Mendez-Largo et al. 2010
CREBBP
EP300
inactivating mutations/
deletions
Reduced acetyltransferase activity
Impaired acetylation of BCL6
Impaired acetylation of p53
Epigenetic reprogramming
Enhanced BCL6 oncogenic function
Loss of p53 tumor suppressor activity
Pasqualucci et al. 2011
PTEN deletions Loss of PIP3 negative regulation Activation of AKT signaling pathway Lenz et al. 2008
PIK3CA activating mutations Increased catalytic activity Activation of AKT signaling pathway Abubaker et al. 2007
BCL6 mutations of the B6BS
t(3;other)(q27;other)
Evasion from BCL6 autoregulation
Deregulated expression
Enhanced proliferation
Resistance to apoptosis
Block in differentiation
Impaired DNA damage response
Wang et al. 2002
Pasqualucci et al. 2003
REL gene amplification Increased gene dosage Unclear Rosenwald et al. 2002
ABC-DLBCL
GENE GENETIC
ALTERATION
FUNCTIONAL CONSEQUENCES MECHANISM OF TRANSFORMATION REFERENCES
TNFAIP3
(A20)
biallelic
mutations/deletions
Loss of NF-kB negative regulation Constitutive NF-kB signaling
Enhanced cell survival
Compagno et al. 2009
CARD11 activating mutations Increased NF-kB activation Constitutive NF-kB signaling
Enhanced cell survival
Lenz et al. 2008
CD79A
CD79B
activating mutations Increased BCR expression
Reduced activation of Lyn
Constitutive NF-kB signaling
Enhanced cell survival
Davis et al. 2001
MYD88 activating mutation Spontaneous assembly and activity
of IRAK1/ IRAK4 complex
Constitutive NF-kB signaling
JAK/STAT signaling activation
Ngo et al. 2011
BCL6 t(3;other)(q27;other) Deregulated expression Enhanced proliferation
Resistance to apoptosis
Block in differentiation
Impaired DNA damage response
Ye et al. 1993
Kerckaert et al. 1993
Iqbal et al. 2007
PRDM1
(BLIMP1)
biallelic mutations/ deletions Loss of PRDM1 function Block in differentiation Pasqualucci et al. 2006
Tam et al. 2006
Mandelbaum et al. 2010
BCL2 gene amplification Enhanced expression of BCL2 Inhibition of apoptosis Monni et al. 1997
INK4a/ARF homozygous deletion Loss of function Inhibition of apoptosis
Inactivation of the p53 pathway
Lenz et al. 2008
PMBL
GENE GENETIC
ALTERATION
FUNCTIONAL CONSEQUENCES MECHANISM OF TRANSFORMATION REFERENCES
JAK2 gene amplification Increased gene dosage Enhanced proliferation and cellular
transformation
Guiter et al, 2004
PDL1
PDL2
gene amplification Increased gene dosage Evasion of T-cell mediated immune
response
Rosenwald et al. 2003
Green et al. 2010
SOCS1 homozygous deletion Loss of JAK2 degradation Enhanced JAK2 signaling Mestre et al. 2005
Melzner et al. 2005
TNFAIP3 mutations/deletions Loss of NF-kB negative regulation Constitutive NF-kB signaling
Enhanced cell survival
Schmitz et al. 2009
REL gene amplification Increased gene dosage Unclear Bentz et al. 2001,
Wessendorf et al. 2007

In approximately 35% of cases, the translocation t(14;18) leads to the ectopic expression of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) oncogene, a key anti-apoptotic molecule also expressed in follicular lymphoma (FL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia 54. BCL-2 translocations deregulate BCL-2 by juxtaposing potent regulatory elements from the Ig locus in close proximity to the BCL-2 locus, as well as by disrupting negative suppression by BCL-6 16,20. Additionally, about 40% of DLBCL cases without a t(14;18) translocation co-express BCL-2 and BCL-6 as the results of several mechanisms including i) deregulation of Miz1, the coactiator molecule by which BCL-6 binds to the BCL-2 promoter; i) ASHM of BCL-2 promoter sequences, iii) mutations in the BCL-2 coding sequence 16. Increased levels of BCL-2 have been associated with an inferior outcome in DLBCL 55-56.

In 15% of DLBCL, the MYC gene, encoding for a transcription factor associated with Burkitt lymphoma, is deregulated due to chromosomal translocations –most commonly t(8;14) 55– which bring the MYC coding sequence under the control of the immunoglobulin promoter 57. Amplifications of the MIGH1 region containing the microRNA (miR) 17-92 cluster on chromosome 13q are found in around 12% of GCB-DLBCL 58. This microRNA polycistron acts as a potential oncogene and accelerates MYC-induced lymphomagenesis in mice 59-60. Furthermore, the cluster enhances oncogenesis by increasing proliferation and survival via inhibition of the tumor suppressor PTEN and the pro-apoptotic protein BIM 60. Interestingly, deletions of PTEN on chromosome 10q, which are found in around 11% of cases and lead to the activation of AKT, are more frequent in GCB-DLBCL than ABC-DLBCL, and are mutually exclusive to amplifications involving the miR-17-92-cluster 58,61. Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) activates AKT and other pathways that inhibit apoptosis, promote cellular growth, cell motility and angiogenesis. Activating Mutations in PI3K are found in about 8% of DLBCL and are mutually exclusive with loss of PTEN 62.

A number of chromatin modifying genes have been reported to be mutated in DLBCL with a prevalence in GCB-DLBCL. Recurrent somatic mutations affecting a single residue in the polycomb-group oncogene EZH2 have been found in 21.7% of GCB-DLBCL 63. EZH2 is part of the Polycomb Repressive Complex and encodes for a histone methyltransferase trimethylating Lys27 of histone H3. The identified mutations result in the replacement of a single tyrosine within the gene Set domain and have been recently shown to enhance the ability of EZH2 to trimethylate histone H3, in part by increasing its affinity for the substrate 63-65. The histone methyltransferase MLL2 is somatically mutated in around 30% of DLBCL. The majority of the mutations introduce premature stop codons and frame-shift insertions and deletions that most likely inactivate MLL2 66-67 (and unpublished data). Myocyte enhancer factor 2B (MEF2B) is a member of the MADS/MEF2 family of DNA binding proteins which cooperates with histone modifying enzymes to regulate expression of genes. MEF2B is mutated in about 9% of DLBCL 66-67(and unpublished data). A recent study has identified monoallelic deletions and mutations inactivating CREBBP and EP300 in nearly 39% of GCB-DLBCL and less frequently in ABC-DLBCL (17% of samples) 52. CREBBP and EP300 are acetyltransferases that act as transcriptional co-activators in multiple signaling pathways. As a consequence of the mutations, CREBBP/EP300 lose their ability to acetylate BCL-6 and p53, a post-translational modification that inactivates BCL-6 by disrupting the recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs) and thus hindering its capacity to repress transcription, while representing an essential requirement for p53 activation 68-69. Thus, CREBBP and EP300 mutations may contribute to lymphomagenesis by favoring the decreased activity of the tumor suppressor and constitutive activation of the oncogene 52. Interestingly, these mutations are also found in about 40% of follicular lymphoma, suggesting that DLBCL and FL share common pathogenetic events 52.

Mutations of p53 have been associated with transformation from follicular lymphoma, and should thus be more frequent in GCB-DLBCL, although conflicting results have been reported in other series. Nevertheless, p53 mutations were able to stratify GCB-DLBCL patients in subgroups with different survival 70-72.

Mutations of the BCL-6 5′ regulatory region are found in about 75% of all DLBCL, and reflect the activity of the physiologic SHM mechanism operating in GC B-cells 7-8. However, a subset of these mutations affecting the gene 5′ untranslated exon 1 were exclusively found in DLBCL – particularly, in GCB-DLBCL – where they impair a negative autoregulatory loop through which BCL-6 controls its own expression 49,73.

Evidence of ASHM is found in GCB-DLBCL as well as in ABC-DLBCL, overall accounting for more than 50% of DLBCL patients 50-51. However, different mutation frequencies have been observed at certain target genes in the two DLBCL phenotypic subtypes. MYC and BCL-2 are preferentially targeted by ASHM in GCB-DLBCL 16.

Genetic Lesions associated with ABC-DLBCL

The ABC subtype of DLBCL has a gene expression pattern that is similar to normal B-cells activated by BCR cross-linking in vitro and to a subset of GC B cells committed to plasma cell differentiation 2. A prominent feature of the ABC-DLBCL gene expression signature is the enrichment in NF-κB target genes, suggesting that constitutive activation of NF-κB plays an important role in this disease subtype 74-75. Indeed, ABC-DLBCL cell lines are specifically dependent on NF-κB activity, as interference with NF-κB signaling kills ABC- but not GCB-DLBCL, and the NF-kB transcription complex is found in the nuclei of the tumor cells in a large fraction of cases 74,76. Constitutive NF-κB activation can be due to several distinct genetic alterations, which affect both positive and negative regulators of the pathway predominantly in ABC-DLBCL (Fig. 2 and Tab. 1) 75,77-79. One of the most commonly involved genes is TNFAIP3, encoding for the negative NF-κB regulator A20, with about 30% of cases displaying biallelic inactivation by mutations and/or deletions 77. A20 is a dual-function ubiquitin-modifying enzyme involved in termination of NF-κB responses 80. Consistently, enforced expression of A20 in DLBCL cell lines carrying biallelic TNFAIP3 inactivation induced cell growth arrest and apoptosis by blocking NF-κB signaling, as demonstrated by the cytoplasmic relocation of p50 77,81. Genetic alterations of A20 are also present in other lymphomas characterized by constitutive NF-κB activation (e.g. marginal zone lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma), while they are rarely found in GCB-DLBCL 77,81-83.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Oncogenic pathways in ABC-DLBCL

The stimulation of several surface receptors, including the B-cell receptor (BCR), CD40 or Toll-like receptors, triggers signaling cascades resulting in the activation of the NF-kB pathway. In ABC-DLBCL, NF-kB is constitutively activated and several genetic lesions that contribute to this activation have been identified.

In normal B-cells, BCR induced activation of NF-κB requires CARD11, a scaffold protein that coordinates the activation of IκB kinase β 84. Mutations of CARD11 are found in around 10% of ABC-DLBCL as well as in a smaller subset of GCB-DLBCL, and typically affect amino acids within or adjacent to the coiled-coil domain 77,85. Introduction of CARD11 mutants into lymphoma cell lines leads to constitutive NF-κB activation, suggesting that lymphoma cells with CARD11 mutations are engaging the NF-κB pathway in the absence of BCR signaling 85. CD79A and CD79B are proximal BCR subunits and were found to be mutated in around 20% of ABC-DLBCL 74. The mutations target the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) of CD79A and CD79B, most frequently at a conserved tyrosine residue, thus increasing surface BCR expression and attenuating a feedback inhibitor of BCR signaling 74. Overall, CD79A and CD79B mutations are thought to induce chronic active BCR signaling, with consequent activation of NF-κB, PI3K and MAP-kinase pathways.

During the normal immune response, NF-κB is also activated after stimulation of TLRs and receptors for interleukin (IL) 1 and 8 86-87. MYD88 functions as a signaling adaptor protein, coordinating the assembly of a complex that activates NF-κB following TLRs and IL-1 and IL8 receptors stimulation 86-87. MYD88 mutations are found in about 30% of ABC-DLBCL, harboring the same amino acid substitution (L265P) in the Toll/IL-1 receptor domain 78. The L265P mutant protein may promote cell survival by activating NF-κB-signalling, JAK kinase activation of STAT3, and secretion of IL-6, IL-10 and INFβ 78.

Other mutations affecting NF-κB modulators in DLBCLs include TRAF2 (3%), TRAF5 (5%), MAP3K7 (5%) and RANK (8%) 77. A TRAF2 mutant isolated from an ABC-DLBCL was able to activate NF-κB, while the functional consequences of the remaining mutations have not been studied in detail 77.

Consistent with these findings, treatment with the proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib, which blocks the degradation of IκBα, leads to significantly higher response rates in ABC-DLBCL patients 88.

Normal GC-B-cells require the down regulation of BCL-6 – mediated by NF-kB – and expression of IRF4, BLIMP1 and XBP1 for plasma cell differentiation 17-18,24. In ABC-DLBCL, several lesions involving this pathway have been found. Chromosomal translocations of BCL-6, located on chromosome 3q27, are detected in about 35% of cases, with a two-fold higher incidence in ABC-DLBCL as compared to GCB-DLBCL 73,89-91. The translocations are balanced, reciprocal and involve various alternative partners 12,91-94. Most of the translocations result in a fusion transcript, with the promoter region and the first non-coding exon of BCL-6 being replaced by the translocation partner 95-96. The most common translocations involve the immunoglobulin heavy-chain promoter, resulting in constitutive expression of BCL-6 12,91. Deregulated expression of BCL-6 is thought to play a critical role in blocking differentiation, decreasing the p53-mediated apoptotic response to DNA damage as well as providing a proliferative advantage 14-15,17-20. This is supported by the fact that mice with deregulated BCL-6 expression develop DLBCL 97.

The PRDM1 gene – located on chromosome 6q21 – encodes for BLMP1, a zinc finger transcriptional repressor. BLIMP1 is essential for the differentiation of B-cells into plasma cells 98-100, which it promotes in part by repressing genes involved in BCR signaling and proliferation 101-102. Inactivating mutations and deletions of PRDM1 are found in up to 30% of ABC-DLBCL 103-106. Additionally, BLIMP1 can be inactivated by transcriptional repression through constitutively active BCL-6, as it is the case in patients carrying BCL-6 translocations. Consistent with this model, chromosomal transloactions of BCL-6 and genetic alterations affecting BLIMP1 are mutually exclusive 103-105. Notably, the remaining over 30% of ABC-DLBCL lack BLIMP1 protein despite the expression of IRF4 and the absence of genetic alterations in BLIMP1 or BCL-6 105. Since IRF4 is invariably co-expressed with BLIMP1 in plasma cells and differentiating GC-B-cells, these observations suggest that alternative mechanisms exist to inactivate BLIMP1 in ABC-DLBCL. The role of BLIMP1 as a tumor suppressor has been recently demonstrated in a mouse model where conditional deletion of the gene leads to the development of lymphoproliferative disorders recapitulating features of ABC-DLBCL 105-106.

Amplifications of the telomeric segment of chromosome 19q are found in about 25% of ABC-DLBCL 58. SPIB – an ETS family transcription factor – is supposed to be one functionally important gene on chromosome 19q, a model supported by the fact that down regulation of SPIB was toxic to ABC-DLBCL cell lines 58. In addition, a translocation between SPIB and the Ig heavy chain locus was found in one ABC-DLBCL cell line 46.

Homozygous or heterozygous deletions of the INK4a/ARF locus are observed in about 30% of ABC-DLBCL 58. P16INK4a and p14ARF regulate the pRB and the p53 tumor suppressor pathways, and inactivation of the p53 pathway via INK4a/ARF is found to inhibit apoptosis in aggressive lymphoid malignancies 107-108.

Genetic Lesions associated with PMBCL

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) accounts for less than 3% of NHLs and is a tumor of young adults with a median age of about 35 years 109-110, and females being affected more frequently than men 111. The only site of lymphoma involvement is the anterior mediastinum, but the rapidly growing bulky tumor can extend locally into other thoracic structures 112. This distinctive location, together with its gene expression profile, suggest that this DLBCL subtype arises from thymic B-cells in the mediastinum 111,113-114. PMBCL are characterized by several genetic alterations (Tab. 1). A common lesion in PMBCL is represented by gains of band 9p24, found in about 70% of the cases 115-117. The amplified region contains several genes of possible pathogenetic significance, including the gene encoding for the tyrosine kinase JAK2 and the PDL1 and PDL2 loci, which are regulators of T-cell responses. These three genes were all expressed at high levels in PMBCL as compared to other DLBCL subtypes 38. Recently PDL1 and PDL2 have been identified as key targets of these amplifications using high-resolution copy number data 118. Overexpression of JAK2 was proposed to be responsible for the constitutive activation of the transcription factor STAT6, due to its ability to activate IL-3 and IL-4, which are both involved in the regulation of STAT6 36,119. Moreover, SOCS1, a negative regulator of JAK2, is commonly affected by genetic lesions in PMBCL 120-121.

PMBCL also shares with ABC-DLBCL the evidence of NF-κB pathway constitutive actiation, with PMBCL expressing increased levels of NF-κB targets that promote cell survival and inhibit apoptosis 122. Gains of chromosome 2p14-16 encompassing the NF-κB family member REL, are found in about 70% PMBCL and include 115,117. Also affected by these gains is BCL11A, a transcriptional repressor that may provide a survival advantage 117.

Interestingly PMBCL and classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma have a notable genomic similarity, including gains on 2p and 9p 123. Furthermore, remarkable similarities in the gene expression profiles of these two diseases have been found 36,38. However, the gene expression signature of PMBCL retains the expression of genes typical of mature B-cells, while these transcripts are shut down in Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Concluding remarks

Within recent years our understanding of the pathogenesis of DLBCL has significantly improved. Genome-wide expression profiling has illustrated the heterogeneity of DLBCL and allowed a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease. The known genetic lesions do not account for all DLBCL cases and therefore only represent a subset of those required for tumor initiation. New techniques like whole genome/exome sequencing and genome-wide SNP analyses have already led to the identification of novel genetically altered genes in DLBCL and further improved our understanding of the disease. Identification of tumors that are dependent on particular signaling pathways is essential to improve disease stratification and will provide more effective and less toxic targeted therapy approaches.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Campo E, et al. The 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and beyond: evolving concepts and practical applications. Blood. 2011 doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-293050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alizadeh AA, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature. 2000;403:503–511. doi: 10.1038/35000501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jacob J, Kelsoe G, Rajewsky K, Weiss U. Intraclonal generation of antibody mutants in germinal centres. Nature. 1991;354:389–392. doi: 10.1038/354389a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Berek C, Berger A, Apel M. Maturation of the immune response in germinal centers. Cell. 1991;67:1121–1129. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90289-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rajewsky K. Clonal selection and learning in the antibody system. Nature. 1996;381:751–758. doi: 10.1038/381751a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shen HM, Peters A, Baron B, Zhu X, Storb U. Mutation of BCL-6 gene in normal B cells by the process of somatic hypermutation of Ig genes. Science. 1998;280:1750–1752. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5370.1750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pasqualucci L, et al. BCL-6 mutations in normal germinal center B cells: evidence of somatic hypermutation acting outside Ig loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:11816–11821. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Migliazza A, et al. Frequent somatic hypermutation of the 5′ noncoding region of the BCL6 gene in B-cell lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:12520–12524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.26.12520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Petersen-Mahrt SK, Harris RS, Neuberger MS. AID mutates E. coli suggesting a DNA deamination mechanism for antibody diversification. Nature. 2002;418:99–103. doi: 10.1038/nature00862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bransteitter R, Pham P, Scharff MD, Goodman MF. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates deoxycytidine on single-stranded DNA but requires the action of RNase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:4102–4107. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0730835100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chaudhuri J, et al. Transcription-targeted DNA deamination by the AID antibody diversification enzyme. Nature. 2003;422:726–730. doi: 10.1038/nature01574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ye BH, Rao PH, Chaganti RS, Dalla-Favera R. Cloning of bcl-6, the locus involved in chromosome translocations affecting band 3q27 in B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Res. 1993;53:2732–2735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ye BH, et al. The BCL-6 proto-oncogene controls germinal-centre formation and Th2-type inflammation. Nat Genet. 1997;16:161–170. doi: 10.1038/ng0697-161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Basso K, et al. Integrated biochemical and computational approach identifies BCL6 direct target genes controlling multiple pathways in normal germinal center B cells. Blood. 2010;115:975–984. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-227017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Phan RT, Dalla-Favera R. The BCL6 proto-oncogene suppresses p53 expression in germinal-centre B cells. Nature. 2004;432:635–639. doi: 10.1038/nature03147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Saito M, et al. BCL6 suppression of BCL2 via Miz1 and its disruption in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:11294–11299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903854106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shaffer AL, et al. BCL-6 represses genes that function in lymphocyte differentiation, inflammation, and cell cycle control. Immunity. 2000;13:199–212. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)00020-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tunyaplin C, et al. Direct repression of prdm1 by Bcl-6 inhibits plasmacytic differentiation. J Immunol. 2004;173:1158–1165. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.2.1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Phan RT, Saito M, Basso K, Niu H, Dalla-Favera R. BCL6 interacts with the transcription factor Miz-1 to suppress the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 and cell cycle arrest in germinal center B cells. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:1054–1060. doi: 10.1038/ni1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ci W, et al. The BCL6 transcriptional program features repression of multiple oncogenes in primary B cells and is deregulated in DLBCL. Blood. 2009;113:5536–5548. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-193037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Niu H, Cattoretti G, Dalla-Favera R. BCL6 controls the expression of the B7-1/CD80 costimulatory receptor in germinal center B cells. J Exp Med. 2003;198:211–221. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ranuncolo SM, et al. Bcl-6 mediates the germinal center B cell phenotype and lymphomagenesis through transcriptional repression of the DNA-damage sensor ATR. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:705–714. doi: 10.1038/ni1478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Turner CA, Jr., Mack DH, Davis MM. Blimp-1, a novel zinc finger-containing protein that can drive the maturation of B lymphocytes into immunoglobulin-secreting cells. Cell. 1994;77:297–306. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90321-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Klein U, et al. Transcription factor IRF4 controls plasma cell differentiation and class-switch recombination. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:773–782. doi: 10.1038/ni1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Klein U, Dalla-Favera R. Germinal centres: role in B-cell physiology and malignancy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:22–33. doi: 10.1038/nri2217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu YJ, et al. Sequential triggering of apoptosis, somatic mutation and isotype switch during germinal center development. Semin Immunol. 1996;8:169–177. doi: 10.1006/smim.1996.0021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Muramatsu M, et al. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell. 2000;102:553–563. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00078-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Revy P, et al. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) deficiency causes the autosomal recessive form of the Hyper-IgM syndrome (HIGM2) Cell. 2000;102:565–575. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00079-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Allman D, et al. BCL-6 expression during B-cell activation. Blood. 1996;87:5257–5268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Saito M, et al. A signaling pathway mediating downregulation of BCL6 in germinal center B cells is blocked by BCL6 gene alterations in B cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:280–292. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Niu H, Ye BH, Dalla-Favera R. Antigen receptor signaling induces MAP kinase-mediated phosphorylation and degradation of the BCL-6 transcription factor. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1953–1961. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.13.1953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kuppers R, Klein U, Hansmann ML, Rajewsky K. Cellular origin of human B-cell lymphomas. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1520–1529. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911113412007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pasqualucci L, et al. AID is required for germinal center-derived lymphomagenesis. Nat Genet. 2008;40:108–112. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shipp MA, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning. Nat Med. 2002;8:68–74. doi: 10.1038/nm0102-68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rosenwald A, et al. The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1937–1947. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Savage KJ, et al. The molecular signature of mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma differs from that of other diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and shares features with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2003;102:3871–3879. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-06-1841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Monti S, et al. Molecular profiling of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identifies robust subtypes including one characterized by host inflammatory response. Blood. 2005;105:1851–1861. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rosenwald A, et al. Molecular diagnosis of primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma identifies a clinically favorable subgroup of diffuse large B cell lymphoma related to Hodgkin lymphoma. J Exp Med. 2003;198:851–862. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Alizadeh AA, Gentles AJ, Lossos IS, Levy R. Molecular outcome prediction in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2794–2795. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0902616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hans CP, et al. Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood. 2004;103:275–282. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wright G, et al. A gene expression-based method to diagnose clinically distinct subgroups of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:9991–9996. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1732008100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lenz G, et al. Stromal gene signatures in large-B-cell lymphomas. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2313–2323. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chang CC, et al. Immunohistochemical expression patterns of germinal center and activation B-cell markers correlate with prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:464–470. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200404000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Choi WW, et al. A new immunostain algorithm classifies diffuse large B-cell lymphoma into molecular subtypes with high accuracy. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5494–5502. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kuppers R, Dalla-Favera R. Mechanisms of chromosomal translocations in B cell lymphomas. Oncogene. 2001;20:5580–5594. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lenz G, et al. Aberrant immunoglobulin class switch recombination and switch translocations in activated B cell-like diffuse large B cell lymphoma. J Exp Med. 2007;204:633–643. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ramiro AR, et al. AID is required for c-myc/IgH chromosome translocations in vivo. Cell. 2004;118:431–438. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pasqualucci L, et al. Hypermutation of multiple proto-oncogenes in B-cell diffuse large-cell lymphomas. Nature. 2001;412:341–346. doi: 10.1038/35085588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pasqualucci L, et al. Mutations of the BCL6 proto-oncogene disrupt its negative autoregulation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2003;101:2914–2923. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang X, Li Z, Naganuma A, Ye BH. Negative autoregulation of BCL-6 is bypassed by genetic alterations in diffuse large B cell lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:15018–15023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.232581199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Montesinos-Rongen M, Van Roost D, Schaller C, Wiestler OD, Deckert M. Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphomas of the central nervous system are targeted by aberrant somatic hypermutation. Blood. 2004;103:1869–1875. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pasqualucci L, et al. Inactivating mutations of acetyltransferase genes in B-cell lymphoma. Nature. 2011;471:189–195. doi: 10.1038/nature09730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lossos IS, et al. Ongoing immunoglobulin somatic mutation in germinal center B cell-like but not in activated B cell-like diffuse large cell lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:10209–10213. doi: 10.1073/pnas.180316097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Weiss LM, Warnke RA, Sklar J, Cleary ML. Molecular analysis of the t(14;18) chromosomal translocation in malignant lymphomas. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1185–1189. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198711053171904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kramer MH, et al. Clinical relevance of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC rearrangements in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 1998;92:3152–3162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gascoyne RD, et al. Prognostic significance of Bcl-2 protein expression and Bcl-2 gene rearrangement in diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood. 1997;90:244–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ladanyi M, Offit K, Jhanwar SC, Filippa DA, Chaganti RS. MYC rearrangement and translocations involving band 8q24 in diffuse large cell lymphomas. Blood. 1991;77:1057–1063. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lenz G, et al. Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma arise by distinct genetic pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:13520–13525. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804295105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.He L, et al. A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene. Nature. 2005;435:828–833. doi: 10.1038/nature03552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Xiao C, et al. Lymphoproliferative disease and autoimmunity in mice with increased miR-17-92 expression in lymphocytes. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:405–414. doi: 10.1038/ni1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chan WJ. Pathogenesis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Int J Hematol. 2010;92:219–230. doi: 10.1007/s12185-010-0602-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Abubaker J, et al. PIK3CA mutations are mutually exclusive with PTEN loss in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia. 2007;21:2368–2370. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Morin RD, et al. Somatic mutations altering EZH2 (Tyr641) in follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas of germinal-center origin. Nat Genet. 2010;42:181–185. doi: 10.1038/ng.518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sneeringer CJ, et al. Coordinated activities of wild-type plus mutant EZH2 drive tumor-associated hypertrimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27) in human B-cell lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:20980–20985. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012525107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yap DB, et al. Somatic mutations at EZH2 Y641 act dominantly through a mechanism of selectively altered PRC2 catalytic activity, to increase H3K27 trimethylation. Blood. 2011;117:2451–2459. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-11-321208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Morin RD. Identification of Genes Frequently Mutated in FL and DLBCL with Transcriptome, Genome and Exome Sequencing. Blood. 2010;116:352. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mendez-Lago M. Mutations In MLL2 and MEF2B Genes In Follicular Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Blood. 2010;116:211. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bereshchenko OR, Gu W, Dalla-Favera R. Acetylation inactivates the transcriptional repressor BCL6. Nat Genet. 2002;32:606–613. doi: 10.1038/ng1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gu W, Roeder RG. Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by acetylation of the p53 C-terminal domain. Cell. 1997;90:595–606. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80521-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lo Coco F, et al. p53 mutations are associated with histologic transformation of follicular lymphoma. Blood. 1993;82:2289–2295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Young KH, et al. Mutations in the DNA-binding codons of TP53, which are associated with decreased expression of TRAILreceptor-2, predict for poor survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2007;110:4396–4405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-072082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Young KH, et al. Structural profiles of TP53 gene mutations predict clinical outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an international collaborative study. Blood. 2008;112:3088–3098. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-129783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Iqbal J, et al. Distinctive patterns of BCL6 molecular alterations and their functional consequences in different subgroups of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia. 2007;21:2332–2343. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Davis RE, Brown KD, Siebenlist U, Staudt LM. Constitutive nuclear factor kappaB activity is required for survival of activated B cell-like diffuse large B cell lymphoma cells. J Exp Med. 2001;194:1861–1874. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.12.1861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Jost PJ, Ruland J. Aberrant NF-kappaB signaling in lymphoma: mechanisms, consequences, and therapeutic implications. Blood. 2007;109:2700–2707. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-025809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lam LT, et al. Small molecule inhibitors of IkappaB kinase are selectively toxic for subgroups of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma defined by gene expression profiling. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:28–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Compagno M, et al. Mutations of multiple genes cause deregulation of NF-kappaB in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Nature. 2009;459:717–721. doi: 10.1038/nature07968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ngo VN, et al. Oncogenically active MYD88 mutations in human lymphoma. Nature. 2011;470:115–119. doi: 10.1038/nature09671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Davis RE, et al. Chronic active B-cell-receptor signalling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Nature. 2010;463:88–92. doi: 10.1038/nature08638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Boone DL, et al. The ubiquitin-modifying enzyme A20 is required for termination of Toll-like receptor responses. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:1052–1060. doi: 10.1038/ni1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kato M, et al. Frequent inactivation of A20 in B-cell lymphomas. Nature. 2009;459:712–716. doi: 10.1038/nature07969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Novak U, et al. The NF-{kappa}B negative regulator TNFAIP3 (A20) is inactivated by somatic mutations and genomic deletions in marginal zone lymphomas. Blood. 2009;113:4918–4921. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-08-174110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Schmitz R, et al. TNFAIP3 (A20) is a tumor suppressor gene in Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma. J Exp Med. 2009;206:981–989. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Rawlings DJ, Sommer K, Moreno-Garcia ME. The CARMA1 signalosome links the signalling machinery of adaptive and innate immunity in lymphocytes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:799–812. doi: 10.1038/nri1944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lenz G, et al. Oncogenic CARD11 mutations in human diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Science. 2008;319:1676–1679. doi: 10.1126/science.1153629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Lin SC, Lo YC, Wu H. Helical assembly in the MyD88-IRAK4-IRAK2 complex in TLR/IL-1R signalling. Nature. 2010;465:885–890. doi: 10.1038/nature09121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Regulation of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Science. 2010;327:291–295. doi: 10.1126/science.1183021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Dunleavy K, et al. Differential efficacy of bortezomib plus chemotherapy within molecular subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2009;113:6069–6076. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-199679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Offit K, et al. t(3;22)(q27;q11): a novel translocation associated with diffuse non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood. 1989;74:1876–1879. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Lo Coco F, et al. Rearrangements of the BCL6 gene in diffuse large cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood. 1994;83:1757–1759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ye BH, et al. Alterations of a zinc finger-encoding gene, BCL-6, in diffuse large-cell lymphoma. Science. 1993;262:747–750. doi: 10.1126/science.8235596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kerckaert JP, et al. LAZ3, a novel zinc-finger encoding gene, is disrupted by recurring chromosome 3q27 translocations in human lymphomas. Nat Genet. 1993;5:66–70. doi: 10.1038/ng0993-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Baron BW, et al. Identification of the gene associated with the recurring chromosomal translocations t(3;14)(q27;q32) and t(3;22)(q27;q11) in B-cell lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:5262–5266. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Miki T, et al. Molecular cloning of the breakpoint for 3q27 translocation in B-cell lymphomas and leukemias. Blood. 1994;83:217–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ye BH, et al. Chromosomal translocations cause deregulated BCL6 expression by promoter substitution in B cell lymphoma. EMBO J. 1995;14:6209–6217. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00311.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Chen W, Iida S, Louie DC, Dalla-Favera R, Chaganti RS. Heterologous promoters fused to BCL6 by chromosomal translocations affecting band 3q27 cause its deregulated expression during B-cell differentiation. Blood. 1998;91:603–607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Cattoretti G, et al. Deregulated BCL6 expression recapitulates the pathogenesis of human diffuse large B cell lymphomas in mice. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:445–455. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Cattoretti G, et al. PRDM1/Blimp-1 is expressed in human B-lymphocytes committed to the plasma cell lineage. J Pathol. 2005;206:76–86. doi: 10.1002/path.1752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Shapiro-Shelef M, et al. Blimp-1 is required for the formation of immunoglobulin secreting plasma cells and pre-plasma memory B cells. Immunity. 2003;19:607–620. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00267-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Angelin-Duclos C, Cattoretti G, Lin KI, Calame K. Commitment of B lymphocytes to a plasma cell fate is associated with Blimp-1 expression in vivo. J Immunol. 2000;165:5462–5471. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.10.5462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Lin Y, Wong K, Calame K. Repression of c-myc transcription by Blimp-1, an inducer of terminal B cell differentiation. Science. 1997;276:596–599. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5312.596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Shaffer AL, et al. Blimp-1 orchestrates plasma cell differentiation by extinguishing the mature B cell gene expression program. Immunity. 2002;17:51–62. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00335-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Pasqualucci L, et al. Inactivation of the PRDM1/BLIMP1 gene in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. J Exp Med. 2006;203:311–317. doi: 10.1084/jem.20052204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Tam W, et al. Mutational analysis of PRDM1 indicates a tumor-suppressor role in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2006;107:4090–4100. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-09-3778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Mandelbaum J, et al. BLIMP1 is a tumor suppressor gene frequently disrupted in activated B cell-like diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:568–579. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Calado DP, et al. Constitutive canonical NF-kappaB activation cooperates with disruption of BLIMP1 in the pathogenesis of activated B cell-like diffuse large cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:580–589. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Pinyol M, et al. p16(INK4a) gene inactivation by deletions, mutations, and hypermethylation is associated with transformed and aggressive variants of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Blood. 1998;91:2977–2984. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Pinyol M, et al. INK4a/ARF locus alterations in human non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas mainly occur in tumors with wild-type p53 gene. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:1987–1996. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65071-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma The Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Classification Project. Blood. 1997;89:3909–3918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Savage KJ, et al. Favorable outcome of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma in a single institution: the British Columbia experience. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:123–130. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Barth TF, Leithauser F, Joos S, Bentz M, Moller P. Mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma: where do we stand? Lancet Oncol. 2002;3:229–234. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(02)00714-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.van Besien K, Kelta M, Bahaguna P. Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma: a review of pathology and management. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1855–1864. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Hofmann WJ, Momburg F, Moller P. Thymic medullary cells expressing B lymphocyte antigens. Hum Pathol. 1988;19:1280–1287. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(88)80282-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Isaacson PG, Norton AJ, Addis BJ. The human thymus contains a novel population of B lymphocytes. Lancet. 1987;2:1488–1491. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92622-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Bentz M, et al. Gain of chromosome arm 9p is characteristic of primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (MBL): comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis and presentation of a novel MBL cell line. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2001;30:393–401. doi: 10.1002/1098-2264(2001)9999:9999<::aid-gcc1105>3.0.co;2-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Joos S, et al. Primary mediastinal (thymic) B-cell lymphoma is characterized by gains of chromosomal material including 9p and amplification of the REL gene. Blood. 1996;87:1571–1578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Wessendorf S, et al. Further delineation of chromosomal consensus regions in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphomas: an analysis of 37 tumor samples using high-resolution genomic profiling (array-CGH) Leukemia. 2007;21:2463–2469. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Green MR, et al. Integrative analysis reveals selective 9p24.1 amplification, increased PD-1 ligand expression, and further induction via JAK2 in nodular sclerosing Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2010;116:3268–3277. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-282780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Guiter C, et al. Constitutive STAT6 activation in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2004;104:543–549. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Kimm LR, et al. Frequent occurrence of deletions in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2007;46:1090–1097. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Mestre C, et al. Homozygous deletion of SOCS1 in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma detected by CGH to BAC microarrays. Leukemia. 2005;19:1082–1084. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Feuerhake F, et al. NFkappaB activity, function, and target-gene signatures in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtypes. Blood. 2005;106:1392–1399. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Joos S, et al. Genomic imbalances including amplification of the tyrosine kinase gene JAK2 in CD30+ Hodgkin cells. Cancer Res. 2000;60:549–552. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Monni O, Joensuu H, Franssila K, Klefstrom J, Alitalo K, Knuutila S. BCL2 overexpression associated with chromosomal amplification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 1997 Aug 1;90(3):1168–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Melzner I, Bucur AJ, Brüderlein S, Dorsch K, Hasel C, Barth TF, Leithäuser F, Möller P. Biallelic mutation of SOCS-1 impairs JAK2 degradation and sustains phospho-JAK2 action in the MedB-1 mediastinal lymphoma line. Blood. 2005 Mar 15;105(6):2535–42. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-09-3701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES