Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Dis. 2012 Oct 12;50:120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.10.007

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The post-tetanic response is increased after ELS. (A) Under low baseline paradigm (0.1Hz) the post-tetanic response in both LII/III-to-LV (left column) and LV-to-LV (right column) networks was significantly increased in ELS (blue) group compared to control (red) (p<0.001, repeated measures ANOVA). (B). Under a high baseline stimulation paradigm (0.5 Hz) the post-tetanic response in LII/III-to-LV (left column) was increased for 6s post-tetanus in ELS (blue) group compared to control (red) (*, p<0.05 repeated measures ANOVA, group effect first 3 data points after time 0s), but was not altered in LV-to-LV network (right column). Inset traces within each graph represent the baseline fEPSP (red or blue), and corresponding the post-tetanic fEPSP (black). Graph values are means ± SEM.