Skip to main content
Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine logoLink to Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
. 2003 Jun;80(2):291–301. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jtg032

Attitudes about prescribing take-home naloxone to injection drug users for the management of heroin overdose: a survey of street-recruited injectors in the San Francisco Bay Area

Karen H Seal 1,✉, Moher Downing 1, Alex H Kral 1, Shannon Singleton-Banks 1, Jon-Paul Hammond 1, Jennifer Lorvick 1, Dan Ciccarone 1, Brian R Edlin 1
PMCID: PMC3456285  PMID: 12791805

Abstract

Naloxone, an injectable opiate antagonist, can immediately reverse an opiate overdose and prevent overdose death. We sought to determine injection drug users’ (IDUs) attitudes about being prescribed take-home naloxone. During November 1999 to February 2000, we surveyed 82 street-recruited IDUs from the San Francisco Bay Area of California who had experienced one or more heroin overdose events. We used a questiomaire that included structured and open-ended questions. Most respondents (89%) had witnessed an overdose, and 90% reported initially attempting lay remedies in an effort to help companions survive. Only 51% reported soliciting emergency assistance (calling 911) for the last witnessed overdose, with most hesitating due to fear of police involvement. Of IDUs surveyed, 87% were strongly in favor of participating in an overdose management training program to receive take-home naloxone and training in resuscitation techniques. Nevertheless, respontdents expressed a variety of concerning attitudes. If provided naloxone, 35% predicted that they might feel comfortable using greater amounts of heroin, 62% might be less inclined to call 911 for an overdose, 30% might leave an overdose victim after naloxone resuscitation, and 46% might not be able to dissuade the victim from using heroin again to alleviate with drawal symptoms induced by naloxone. Prescribing take-home naloxone to IDUs with training in its use and in resuscitation techniques may represent a life-saving, peer-based adjunct to accessing emergency services. Nevertheless, strategies for overcoming potential risks associated with the use of take-home naloxone would need to be emphasized in an overdose management training program.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (77.4 KB).

References

  • 1.What America’s Users Spend on Illegal Drugs. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Drucker E, Garfield J. Overdose trends in five US citres: 1988–1997. Paper presented at: Preventing Heroin Overdose: Pragmatic Approaches; January 13–14, 2000; Seattle, WA.
  • 3.Year-end Emergency Department Data From the Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Rockville, MD: Dept of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Annual Report. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Department of Public Health; 1998–1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Seal KH, Kral AH, Gee L, et al. Predictors and prevention of nonfatal overdose among street-recruited injection heroin users in the San Francisco Bay Area, 1998–1999. Ann J Public Health. 2001;91:1842–1846. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Darke S, Ross J, Hall W. Overdose among heroin users in Sydney, Australia: I. Pprevalence and correlates of non-fatal overdose. Addiction. 1996;91:405–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb02289.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Darke S, Zador D. Fatal heroin “overdose”: a review. Addiction. 1996;91:1765–1772. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb03800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zador D, Sunjic S, Darke S. Herbin-related deaths in New South Wales, 1992: toxicological findings and circumstances. Med J Aust. 1996;164:204–207. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb94136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Levine B, Green D, Smialek JE. The role of ethanol in heroin deaths. J Forensic Sci. 1995;40:808–810. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Powis B, Strang J, Griffiths P, et al. Self-reported overdose among injecting drug users in London: extent and nature of the problem. Addiction. 1999;94:471–478. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9444712.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Taylor A, Frischer M, Goldberg D. Non-tatal overdosing is related to polydrug use in Glasgow [letter; comment] BMJ. 1996;313:1400–1401. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1400b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Darke S, Hall W. The distribution of naloxone to heroin users. Addiction. 1997;92:1195–1199. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb03681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sporer KA. Acute heroin overdose. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:584–590. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-7-199904060-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Darke S, Ross J, Hall W. Overdose among heroin users in Sydney, Australia: II. responses to overdose. Addiction. 1996;91:413–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb02290.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Strang J, Best D, Man L, Noble A, Gossop M. Peer-mitiated overdose resuscitation: fellow drug users could be mobilized to implement resuscitation. Int J Drug Policy. 2000;11:437–445. doi: 10.1016/S0955-3959(00)00070-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Giuliano R. Drug users’ tools of the trade: naloxone and Narcan. Harm Reduction Commun. 1999;9:18–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Physician’s Desk Reference. Montevale, NJ: Medical Economics; 2000.
  • 18.Shulgin A. Controlled Substances: Chemical and Legal Guide to Federal drug Laws. Berkeley, CA: Ronin Publishing, Inc.; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Goldfrank LR, Hoffman RS. The poisoned patient with altered consciousness. Controversies in the use of a “coma cocktail”. JAMA. 1995;274:562–569. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.7.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dettmer K, Naloxone distribution to drug addicts as a contribution to the prevention of opiate overdose fatalities. Paper presented at: Preventing Heroin overdose: Pragmatic Approaches; January 13–14, 2000; Seattle, WA.
  • 21.Ronconi S. Prevention of overdoses among current heroin users in Torino, Italy, for the period 1995–1998. Paper presented at: Preventing Heroin Overdose: Pragmatic Approaches; January 13–14, 2000; Seattle, WA.
  • 22.Bigg D. Dats on take home naloxone are unclear but not condemnatory [letter] BMJ. 2002;324:678–678. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Strang J, Powis B, Best D, et al. Preventing opiate overdose fatalities with take-home naloxone: pre-launch study of possible impact and acceptability. Addiction. 1999;94:199–204. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9421993.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lenton SR, Hargreaves KM. Should we conduct a trial of distributing naloxone to heroin users for peer administration to prevent fatal overdose? Med J Aust. 2000;173:260–263. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb125633.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Watters JK. Trends in risk behavior and HIV seroprevalence in heterosexual injection drug users in San Francisco, 1986–1992. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1994;7:1276–1281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kral AH, Bluthenthal RN, Lorvick J, Gee L, Bacchetti P, Edlin BR. Sexual transmission of HIV-1 among injection drug users in San Francisco, USA: risk-factor analysis. Lancet. 2001;357:1397–1401. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04562-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Watters JK, Biernacki P. Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations. Soc Problems. 1989;36:416–430. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bluthenthal RN, Watters JK. Multimethod research: from targeted sampling to HIV risk behaviors. In: Lambert EY, Ashery RS, Needle RH, editors. Qualitative Methods in the Prevention of Drug Abuse and HIV Research. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1995. pp. 212–230. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Darke S, Hall W, Weatherburn D, Lind B. Fluctuations in heroin purity and the incidence of fatal heroin overdose. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999;54:155–161. doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(98)00159-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bammer G, Sengoz A. Non-fatal heroin overdoses [letter] Med J Aust. 1994;161:572–573. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb127616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gossop M, Griffiths P, Powis B, Williamson S, Strang J. Frequency of non-fatal heroin overdose: survey of heroin users recruited in non-clinical settings. BMJ. 1996;313:402–402. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7054.402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Levy JA, Gallmeier CP, Weibel WW. The outreach assisted peer-support model for controlling drug dependency. J Drug Issues. 1995;25:507–529. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hawkins WE, Latkin C, Mandel W, Oziemkowska M. Do actions speak louder than words? Perceived peer influences on needle sharing and cleaning in a sample of injection drug users. AIDS Educ Prev. 1999;11:122–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Broadhead RS, Heckathorn DD, Weakliem DL, et al. Hernessing peer networks as an instrument for AIDS prevention: results from a peer-driven intervention. Public Health Rep. 1998;113(Suppl 1):42–57. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Burris S, Noreland J, Edlin B. Legal aspects of providing naloxone to heroin users in the United States. Int J Drug Policy. 2001;12:237–248. doi: 10.1016/S0955-3959(01)00080-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sporer KA, Firestone J, Isaacs SM. Out of-hospital treatment of opioid overdoses in an urban setting. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3:660–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03487.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Smith DA, Leake L, Loflin JR, Yealy DM. Is admission after intravenous heroin overdose necessary? Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:1326–1330. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81896-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vilke GM, Buchanan J, Dunford JV, Chan TC. Are heroin overdose deaths related to patient release after prehospital treatment with naloxone? Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999;3:183–186. doi: 10.1080/10903129908958933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Unintentional overdose in King County, Washington, 1990–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000;49:633–636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Herbin overdose deaths—Multnomah County, Oregon, 1993–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000;49:633–636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Watters JK, Needle R, Brown BS, Weatherby N, Booth R, Williams M. The self-reporting of cocaine use. JAMA. 1992;268:2374–2375. doi: 10.1001/jama.268.17.2374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dowling-Guyer S, Johnson ME, Fisher DG, et al. Relability of drug user’s self-reported HIV risk behaviors and validity of self-reported recent drug use. Assessment. 1994;1:383–392. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine

RESOURCES