Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 23.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2012 Aug 23;75(4):714–724. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.016

Figure 5. Cognitive training during adolescence altered phase synchrony between mPFC sites and between mPFC and hippocampus in adult NVHL rats.

Figure 5

Significant group differences between adolescent trained NVHL and adolescent exposed NVHL rats during the two-frame task. A. Inter-mPFC synchrony: group (F1,30 = 11.27, p = 0.002), frequency (F4,30 = 3.80, p = 0.01), interaction (F4,30 = 0.17, p = 0.95) and B. inter hippocampus-phase synchrony: group (F1,30 = 8.61, p = 0.006), frequency (F4,25 = 2.83, p = 0.04), interaction (F4,25 = 0.29, p = 0.88). C. No significant group difference between adolescent trained NVHL and adolescent trained control rats in inter-mPFC synchrony: group (F1,20 = 2.21, p = 0.15), frequency (F4,20 = 1.55, p = 0.23), interaction (F4,20 = 0.71, p = 0.60) but D. a significant group difference in inter hippocampus-mPFC synchrony: group (F1,10 = 14.48, p = 0.004), frequency (F4,10 = 4.41, p = 0.03), interaction (F4,10 = 0.65, p = 0.64).