Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 28.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2010 May 27;173(2):162–164. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2010.05.015

Elevated levels of tryparedoxin peroxidase in antimony unresponsive Leishmania donovani field isolates

Susan Wyllie 1, Goutam Mandal 2, Neeloo Singh 3, Shyam Sundar 4, Alan H Fairlamb 1, Mitali Chatterjee 2
PMCID: PMC3428625  EMSID: UKMS49360  PMID: 20553768

Abstract

Enhancement of the anti-oxidant metabolism of Leishmania parasites, dependent upon the unique dithiol trypanothione, has been implicated in laboratory-generated antimony resistance. Here, the role of the trypanothione-dependent anti-oxidant pathway is studied in antimony-resistant clinical isolates. Elevated levels of tryparedoxin and tryparedoxin peroxidase, key enzymes in hydroperoxide detoxification, were observed in antimonial resistant parasites resulting in an increased metabolism of peroxides. These data suggest that enhanced anti-oxidant defences may play significant in clinical resistance to antimonials.

Keywords: antimonial resistance, Leishmania donovani, tryparedoxin peroxidase


After more than half a century as the mainstay therapy for leishmaniasis, the clinical value of antimonial drugs is threatened by the emergence of acquired drug resistance [1]. In recent years, failure of antimony-based therapies in Bihar, India, has escalated, with over 50% of the estimated 250,000 annual cases of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) being unresponsive. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms of resistance to antimonials is crucial, not only in the on-going fight to save these therapies, but also for future design of more effective anti-leishmanials.

To date, our knowledge of antimony resistance mechanisms in Leishmania spp. has primarily emerged from the study of laboratory-generated drug-resistant cell lines, created through step-wise exposure to antimony [2, 3]. In more recent times, several features of drug resistance have been corroborated in antimonial-resistant field isolates and have placed the unique thiol metabolism of Leishmania at the centre of antimonial resistance mechanisms [4-6]. In Leishmania, the major low molecular mass thiol is trypanothione (T[SH]2 or N1,N8-bis(glutathionyl)spermidine), in contrast to most other organisms which utilize glutathione (GSH or γ-L-glutamyl-L-cysteinylglycine) [7]. In laboratory-induced antimonial-resistant strains of Leishmania, elevated levels of T[SH]2 and GSH, following over-expression of the rate-limiting enzymes involved in the synthesis of GSH (γ-glutamylcysteine synthase, 8) and polyamines (ornithine decarboxylase, 9) have been observed. In addition, overexpression of PgpA, an intracellular metal-thiol transporter from the ATP-binding cassette transporter family, has also been demonstrated to play a key role in resistance [8, 10]. Since T[SH]2 is known to conjugate with the reduced form of antimony (SbIII) [11], it has been hypothesised that antimony is detoxified via the formation of SbIII-thiol complexes, which then get sequestered into an intracellular vacuolar compartment by PgpA [10].

One of the principal functions of T[SH]2 within Leishmania is to provide reducing equivalents to facilitate the parasite’s defence against oxidative stress [7, 12] with enzymes of the tryparedoxin peroxidase family considered to be principally responsible for detoxification of peroxides [13]. The decameric type I tryparedoxin peroxidase (TryP) [14, 15], is a 2-Cys peroxidase, obtaining its reducing equivalents from T[SH]2 via the dithiol protein tryparedoxin (TryX). Studies have associated overexpression of TryP with resistance to both arsenite [16], and antimony [17] in laboratory-generated Leishmania resistant cell lines implying that enhanced antioxidant defences, through overexpression of TryP, may well be a key feature of resistance to antimonials in field isolates.

To test this hypothesis, clinical isolates were derived from patients with VL who either responded to sodium stibogluconate (SbV, SAG) (S1 and S2) or were refractory to SAG (R1, R2 and R3) and cultured as previously described [6]. In addition, isolates were obtained from patients with VL who came from a SAG responsive zone (S3) or areas having mixed or high resistance to SAG (R4 and R5) [18]. To verify their resistance phenotype, a modified 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay was used to determine their relative sensitivities to SbIII in promastigotes [19]. In addition, isolates were also assayed for their sensitivity to SbV in amastigotes using a previously described murine macrophage assay [4]. In line with their clinical designation, isolates resistant to antimonials or from an antimonial-unresponsive zone (R1-5, SbR) were markedly less sensitive to both SbIII and SbV in both developmental stages than their clinically sensitive counterparts (S1-3, SbS, Table 1).

Table 1. Antimony sensitivity profiles of L. donovani clinical isolates.

Isolate Location (Bihar)
Degree of resistance
EC50
Promastigotes
(SbIII, μg ml−1)
EC50
Amastigotes
(SbV, μg ml−1)
S1 Responded to SAG 15.0 ± 2.5 [19] 9.0 ± 0.5 [4]
S2 Responded to SAG 21.3 ± 2.8 [19] 13.0 ± 1.5 [4]
S3 Siwan (no resistance) 5.8 ± 2.4 7.8 ± 2.5
R1 Non-responsive to SAG 76.1 ± 4.8 [19] 24 ± 1.4 [4]
R2 Non-responsive to SAG 75.3 ± 5.4 [19] 65 ± 3.4 [4]
R3 Non-responsive to SAG 111.2 ± 5.4 [19] >100 [4]
R4 Mixed resistance (Chapra, Saran) 92.7 ± 5.4 ND
R5? High resistance (Samastipur) 88.8 ± 7.9 29.3 ± 6.4

The sensitivity of clinical isolates to trivalent antimony (SbIII) in promastigotes was measured by exposing log-phase parasites to varying concentrations of SbIII (0-200 μg ml−1) for 48 h and cell viability assessed by the MTT assay [19]. Amastigote sensitivity to SbV [4] was determined in a murine macrophage model. EC50 values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of at least two independent experiments.

To establish a correlation, if any, between elevated TryP and clinical resistance to antimonials, immunoblots of whole cell lysates were probed with antisera against TryP and TryX, as previously described [17]. In keeping with our previous studies of lab-generated SbIII resistance, TryP was found to be clearly amplified at the protein level in all SbR strains as compared to their SbS counterparts (Figure 1). In addition, levels of TryX, important in controlling the flux of reducing equivalents from T[SH]2 to TryP, were also markedly elevated in three out of five resistant isolates (R1, R2 and R3, Figure 1). To examine whether the overexpression of TryP and TryX in SbR isolates correlated with an enhanced ability to metabolise hydroperoxides, clarified extracts were prepared and assayed for T[SH]2-dependent peroxidase activity, H2O2 being the substrate (Table 2, 17). All SbR isolates studied were found to metabolise H2O2 at higher rates than SbS isolates, with mean specific activities of 10.6 ± 2.8 and 3.8 ± 1.8 nmol min−1 mg−1, respectively. In particular, lysate prepared from isolate R2 was found to metabolise H2O2 most efficiently with its specific activity (13.1 ± 0.8 nmol min−1 mg−1) being 2.4, 3.0 and 7-fold higher than activities of S1, S2 and S3 lysates, respectively. In contrast, lysate derived from isolate R3 was the least adept of all SbR isolates at metabolising H2O2, being only marginally more efficient than S1. On an individual basis, the activities of R1, R2, R4 and R5 were significantly higher than S1 (p<0.001), S2 (p<0.001) and S3 (p<0.001), whereas the activity of R3 was significantly higher than S2 (p<0.05) and S3 (p<0.001). To ensure that cells had been adequately extracted, the specific activity of alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), an unrelated housekeeping enzyme was monitored. Reassuringly, ALAT activity was similar in all lysates derived from both SbR and SbS field isolates. As in the case of laboratory-generated SbIII-resistant cells [17], metabolism of H2O2 in SbR isolates was further enhanced upon addition of exogenous recombinant L. major TryX (Table 2). These observations suggest that TryX remains the rate-limiting step of peroxide metabolism, under these assay conditions.

Figure 1. Immunoblot analysis of whole cell lysates of antimony sensitive and resistant clinical isolates.

Figure 1

Blots of cell extracts from antimony sensitive (S1-3) and antimony-resistant (R1-5) isolates (1 × 107 parasites in each lane) were probed with anti-serum to L.major tryparedoxin peroxidase type I (TryP), L. major tryparedoxin (TryX) and. L. major PTR1, as previously described (17).

Table 2. Specific activities of trypanothione reductase and T[SH]2-dependent peroxidase in soluble extracts of L. donovani clinical isolates.

Enzymatic activity Substrate Specific activity (nmol min−1 mg−1)

S1 S2 S3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5
Trypanothione-
dependent
peroxidase
H2O2 5.5 ± 0.5 4.2 ± 0.4 1.82 ± 0.1 10.8 ± 1.2 13.1 ± 0.8 6.0 ± 0.1 12.7 ± 0.7 10.6 ± 0.3

H2O2 + TryX (1 μM) 6.8 ± 0.6 6.0 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.2 17.2 ± 0.9 18.9 ± 1.2 10.2 ± 1.0 17.7 ± 1.4 13.9 ± 0.8

Trypanothione
reductase
T[S]2 48.3 ± 6.1 35.3 ± 0.8 46.1 ± 1.0 103 ± 3.7 37.5 ± 2.1 38.2 ± 2.1 42.1 ± 1.5 51.7 ± 2.4

Alanine
aminotransferase
Ala
+ α KG
1570 ± 60 1630 ± 60 1630 ± 100 1640 ± 50 1480 ± 60 1600 ± 20 1680 ± 10 1672 ± 60

All enzymatic activities were assayed as previously described [17] and corrected for non-enzymatic background rates.

Trypanothione reductase (TryR) is considered as a key enzyme in the redox metabolism of Leishmania since it acts as the sole route of reducing equivalents from the NADP+/NADPH couple to T[SH]2 [20]. Indeed, amplification of TryR has been associated with antimony resistance in field isolates [5]. To examine its overexpression in the antimony resistance mechanisms of our clinical isolates, TryR activity was monitored (Table 2, 20). TryR activity was relatively similar across all SbS and SbR extracts assayed, except for R1 which maintained an elevated reductase activity (~2-3-fold). The absence of a direct correlation between elevated TryR activity and antimonial resistance indicates that at least in the clinical setting, no clear role can be attributed to TryR and analysis of additional isolates is necessary.

As illustrated in several recent studies, clinical resistance to antimonial drugs is undoubtedly a multi-factorial process and contributory factors include elevated intracellular thiols [5,6], overexpression of drug efflux pumps (Pgp A) [4] and modulation of drug uptake transporters (aquaglyceroporin) [21]. In the current study, we add to this growing list by demonstrating a strong association between antimony resistance in a clinical setting and an enhanced ability to metabolize hydrogen peroxide. Since exposure to antimonials is known to lead to accumulation of damaging reactive oxygen species within Leishmania parasites [6, 11], it is easy to envisage how an enhanced ability to detoxify these deadly metabolites confers resistance in clinical isolates. The exact basis for the elevated levels of TryX and TryP in these clinical isolates remains to be determined, however, it is likely to be due to gene amplification.

As demonstrated in this and other studies [4-6, 11], the individual and cumulative impact of each resistance factor seems to be highly variable in clinical isolates and thus identifying a single biomarker for antimonial resistance is likely to be problematic. Undoubtedly, subsequent studies will be required to further unravel the complexities of clinical resistance. However, here we confirm our earlier in vitro observations by demonstrating a clear association between enhanced anti-oxidant defenses and clinical resistance to antimonial drugs.

Acknowledgements

Thios work received financial assistance from Dept. of Science & Technology, Govt of India and the Wellcome Trust, UK.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Croft SL, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH. Drug Resistance in Leishmaniasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:111–26. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.1.111-126.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Borst P, Ouellette M. New mechanisms of drug resistance in parasitic protozoa. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995;49:427–60. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.002235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ouellette M, Légaré D, Papadopoulou B. Multidrug resistance and ABC transporters in parasitic protozoa. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;3:201–06. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mukherjee A, Padmanabhan PK, Singh S, Roy G, Girard I, Chatterjee M, Ouellette M, Madhubala R. Role of ABC transporter MRPA, gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase and ornithine decarboxylase in natural antimony-resistant isolates of Leishmania donovani. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59:204–11. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mittal MK, Rai S, Ravinder A, Gupta S, Sundar S, Goyal N. Characterization of natural antimony resistance in Leishmania donovani isolates. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:681–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mandal G, Wyllie S, Singh N, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH, Chatterjee M. Increased levels of thiols protect antimony unresponsive Leishmania donovani field isolates against reactive oxygen species generated by trivalent antimony. Parasitology. 2007;134:1679–87. doi: 10.1017/S0031182007003150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fairlamb AH, Cerami A. Metabolism and functions of trypanothione in the Kinetoplastida. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1992;46:695–729. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.46.100192.003403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grondin K, Haimeur A, Mukhopadhyay R, Rosen BP, Ouellette M. Co-amplification of the g-glutamylcysteine synthetase gene gsh1 and of the ABC transporter gene pgpA in arsenite-resistant Leishmania tarentolae. EMBO J. 1997;16:3057–65. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.11.3057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haimeur A, Guimond C, Pilote S, Mukhopadhyay R, Rosen BP, Poulin P, Ouellette M. Elevated levels of polyamines and trypanothione resulting from overexpression of the ornithine decarboxylase gene in arsenite-resistant Leishmania. Mol Microbiol. 1993;34:726–35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01634.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Légaré D, Richard D, Mukhopadhyay R, Stierhof YD, Rosen BP, Haimeur A, Papadopoulou B, Ouellette M. The Leishmania ATP-binding cassette protein PGPA is an intracellular metal-thiol transporter ATPase. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:26301–07. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102351200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wyllie S, Cunningham ML, Fairlamb AH. Dual action of antimonial drugs on thiol redox metabolism in the human pathogen Leishmania donovani. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:39925–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405635200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Flohé L, Hecht HJ, Steinert P. Glutathione and trypanothione in parasitic hydroperoxide metabolism. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;27:966–84. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00172-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Flohe L, Budde H, Hofmann B. Peroxiredoxins in antioxidant defense and redox regulation. BioFactors. 2003;19:3–10. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520190102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Flohé L, Budde H, Bruns K, Castro H, Clos J, Hofmann B, Kansal-Kalavar S, Krumme D, Menge U, Plank-Schumacher K, Sztajer H, Wissing J, Wylegalla C, Hecht HJ. Tryparedoxin peroxidase of Leishmania donovani: Molecular cloning, heterologous expression, specificity, and catalytic mechanism. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2002;397:324–35. doi: 10.1006/abbi.2001.2688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Levick MP, Tetaud E, Fairlamb AH, Blackwell JM. Identification and characterisation of a functional peroxidoxin from Leishmania major. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1998;96:125–37. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(98)00122-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lin YC, Hsu JY, Chiang SC, Lee ST. Distinct overexpression of cytosolic and mitochondrial tryparedoxin peroxidases results in preferential detoxification of different oxidants in arsenite-resistant Leishmania amazonensis with and without DNA amplification. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005;142:66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2005.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wyllie S, Vickers TJ, Fairlamb AH. Roles of trypanothione S-transferase and tryparedoxin peroxidase in resistance to antimonials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1359–65. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01563-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sundar S. Drug resistance in Indian visceral leishmaniasis. Trop Med Intl Hlth. 2002;6:849–54. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2001.00778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mandal G, Sarkar A, Saha P, Singh N, Sundar S, Chatterjee M. Functionality of drug efflux pumps in antimonial resistant Leishmania donovani field isolates. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 2009;46:86–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cunningham ML, Fairlamb AH. Trypanothione reductase from Leishmania donovani - Purification, characterisation and inhibition by trivalent antimonials. Eur J Biochem. 1995;230:460–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20583.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mandal S, Maharjan M, Singh S, Chatterjee M, Madhubala R. Assessing aquaglyceroporin gene status and expression profile in antimony-susceptible and - resistant clinical isolates of Leishmania donovani from India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:496–507. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES