Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 3;303(4):R438–R448. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00092.2012

Table 2.

Energy expenditure and movement: energy expenditure

TEE, kcal/24 h REE, kcal/24 h NREE, kcal/24 h Movement, 1000×)
Calo 2: 30°C, WR
    HFD-AL 9.3 ± 0.3A 5.6 ± 0.3A 3.7 ± 0.1A 158.8 ± 28.6A
    HFD-WR 6.7 ± 0.2C 4.0 ± 0.1B 2.7 ± 0.1B 162.8 ± 21.9A
    LFD-AL 7.7 ± 0.1B 4.1 ± 0.1B 3.6 ± 0.1A 251.7 ± 24.0B
Calo 3: 22°C, WR
    HFD-AL 16.3 ± 0.7A€ 12.4 ± 0.5A€ 3.9 ± 0.1A∈ 106.7 ± 16.4A
    HFD-WR 12.1 ± 0.2B€ 8.6 ± 0.2B€ 3.5 ± 0.1A∈ 175.0 ± 12.5B
    LFD-AL 12.8 ± 0.4B€ 8.7 ± 0.3B€ 4.1 ± 0.1A∈ 210.1 ± 13.7B
Calo 4: 22°C, Post-WR
    HFD-AL 15.8 ± 0.7A 11.7 ± 0.7A 4.1 ± 0.2A$ 88.5 ± 15.9A
    HFD-WR 15.8 ± 0.4A$ 11.9 ± 0.4A$ 3.9 ± 0.3A 131.0 ± 12.7A
    LFD-AL 15.8 ± 0.5A$ 12.0 ± 0.2A$ 3.8 ± 0.3A 139.6 ± 14.0A

Values are expressed as means ± SE.TEE, total energy expenditure; REE, resting energy expenditure (lowest 1-h TEE period); NREE, nonresting energy expenditure (calculated as TEE − REE) and ambulatory movement (1000×) for all three mouse groups at 30°C (Calo 2, Phase 2), 22°C (Calo 3, Phase 3) and following diet switch to HFD at 22°C (Calo 4, Phase 4).

A,B,C Levels not connected by same letter within Calo measurement period are significantly different (P < 0.05).

€

Significantly different (P < 0.05) between Calo 3 and Calo 2 (ambient temperature comparison).

$

Significantly different (P < 0.05) between Calo 4 and Calo 3. HFD feeding for all group comparison.