Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2012 May 9;287(27):23095–23103. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.367888

Arrangement of the Respiratory Chain Complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Supercomplex III2IV2 Revealed by Single Particle Cryo-Electron Microscopy*

Eugenia Mileykovskaya ‡,1, Pawel A Penczek ‡, Jia Fang ‡,2, Venkata K P S Mallampalli ‡,2, Genevieve C Sparagna §, William Dowhan ‡,3
PMCID: PMC3391107  PMID: 22573332

Background: Organization of respiratory chains as “respirasome” superstructures is established.

Results: Three-dimensional cryo-EM analysis of the yeast supercomplex III2IV2 identified the arrangement of complexes III and IV. Supercomplex cardiolipin content was determined.

Conclusion: Complexes III and IV organization in the yeast supercomplex differs from the arrangement in mammals.

Significance: Respirasome structure is essential for understanding its function and regulation in different species.

Keywords: Bioenergetics/Electron Transfer Complex, Cardiolipin, Lipids, Membrane Proteins, Mitochondria, Cryo-electron Microscopy, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Complex III, Complex IV, Supercomplex

Abstract

Here we present for the first time a three-dimensional cryo-EM map of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae respiratory supercomplex composed of dimeric complex III flanked on each side by one monomeric complex IV. A precise fit of the existing atomic x-ray structures of complex III from yeast and complex IV from bovine heart into the cryo-EM map resulted in a pseudo-atomic model of the three-dimensional structure for the supercomplex. The distance between cytochrome c binding sites of complexes III and IV is about 6 nm, which supports proposed channeling of cytochrome c between the individual complexes. The opposing surfaces of complexes III and IV differ considerably from those reported for the bovine heart supercomplex as determined by cryo-EM. A closer association between the individual complex domains at the aqueous membrane interface and larger spaces between the membrane-embedded domains where lipid molecules may reside are also demonstrated. The supercomplex contains about 50 molecules of cardiolipin (CL) with a fatty acid composition identical to that of the inner membrane CL pool, consistent with CL-dependent stabilization of the supercomplex.

Introduction

During the past decade significant experimental evidence supports the organization of the mitochondrial respiratory chain into higher order “respirasome” structures formed by individual Red-Ox complexes I-IV (1–5), NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase, sucinate:ubiquinone oxidoreductase, ubiqunol:cytochrome c oxidoreductase (cytochrome bc1 complex), and cytochrome c oxidase, respectively. Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacks complex I and instead has several peripheral membrane NADH dehydrogenases (6). The respirasome was suggested to be a dynamic assembly in equilibrium with the individual complexes dependent on cellular metabolic conditions (7, 8). This equilibrium in S. cerevisiae grown on non-fermentable carbon sources, especially lactate, appears to favor supercomplex organization of complex III4 and complex IV (a monomer of cytochrome c oxidase) (9, 10); complex II and two peripheral NADH dehydrogenases may also be associated with the supercomplex (9, 10). The individual complexes contain several tightly bound phospholipid molecules that are integral to the structural integrity of each complex (11–13). The mitochondrial-specific phospholipid cardiolipin (CL)5 is required for higher order organization of the individual complexes into supercomplexes (10, 14–20); also see reviews (3, 21). Understanding how the individual complexes are arranged in respirasomes and what role lipids play in respirasome formation and stability will provide information required for understanding the mechanism of electron transfer between individual complexes as well as the basis for dynamics of respiratory chain re-organization in the mitochondrial membrane.

To study the interaction of complexes I, III, and IV within the bovine heart mitochondria respirasome, three-dimensional EM maps of the respirasome composed of one complex I, one complex III, and one complex IV (supercomplex I1III2IV1) were recently obtained by two different approaches (20, 22). One group performed cryo-electron tomography and sub-volume averaging of the purified detergent-solubilized respirasome (22). Another group used cryo-EM and single particle analysis of the amphipol-solubilized bovine respirasome (20). There is a good agreement between the three-dimensional EM maps obtained by these two approaches. Docking of x-ray crystal structures of individual complexes showed a good agreement using both methods for the interacting surfaces of complexes III and IV and the orientation of complex IV relative to complex III. However, the above organization differs considerably from that for the same supercomplex deduced from a three-dimensional map determined by negative stain EM (23).

S. cerevisiae lacks complex I, and the peripheral dehydrogenases are not found associated with respirasome complexes after solubilization from the mitochondrial membrane by detergents (24, 25). The supercomplex, composed of complex III and two complexes IV (III2IV2) was previously studied by using negative stain EM (26). Analysis of two-dimensional class averages resulted in a proposed three-dimensional arrangement of the individual complexes in which complex III is flanked on each side by a monomer of complex IV (supercomplex IV1-III2-IV1). The suggested orientation of complexes IV toward complex III in yeast differs considerably from that deduced from the cryo-EM map of the bovine supercomplex (20, 22). Given the differences in the structures of the bovine supercomplex determined by single particle analysis using negative-stain EM versus cryo-EM, a reinvestigation of the yeast supercomplex structure by cryo-EM is warranted. Here we present for the first time a three-dimensional map of a S. cerevisiae supercomplex organization obtained by cryo-EM and single particle analysis. Our three-dimensional map determined by cryo-EM reveals more structural details because only a very limited number of views were presented in the negative stain two-dimensional EM class averages (26). In addition, we obtained more details with respect to the transmembrane part of the supercomplex, which was not resolved by negative stain-EM (26). By docking the atomic x-ray structures of complex III from yeast and complex IV from bovine heart into our three-dimensional EM map of the supercomplex, we constructed a pseudo-atomic model of the three-dimensional structure of the supercomplex. Our model in general supports the structure of the yeast supercomplex suggested previously from negative stain data (26). Thus our findings definitely establish that the arrangement of complex IV with respect to complex III in the yeast supercomplex differs significantly from that found in the bovine supercomplex. At the same time our model assumes some specific differences in the interaction of the complexes III and IV compared with atomic model of the yeast supercomplex suggested from negative stain two-dimensional EM class averages. Finally, since the phospholipid CL is required for formation and stabilization of the supercomplex (see above), we also examined the CL species and content in the supercomplex by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Yeast Strain and Growth

S. cerevisiae strain USY00b (Mat α, ade2-1, his3-11-15, leu2-3-112, trp1-1, ura3-52, can1R-100, atp2::LEU2, TRP1::ATP2-His6) was supplied by Dr. David Mueller (Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL) and expresses the FoF1-ATPase β-subunit with a His6 extension (27). The strain was cultivated in YP-lactate growth medium (pH 5.6) containing 1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 3.7% of lactic acid. The cells were harvested (A600 of 2.0) by centrifugation and washed with cold TBS buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 containing 150 mm NaCl).

Isolation of Mitochondria and Mitoplasts

Mitochondria were isolated from spheroplasts of yeast cells as previously described (10) except that 3 mg of Zymolase-20T per g of cells were used, and incubation time was 90 min. Isolated mitochondria were further purified by centrifugation at 30,000 rpm (SW41 Ti) at 4 °C for 90 min through a density gradient containing 60, 32, 23, and 15% layers of sucrose in 15 mm Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4 and 20 mm KCl. Mitochondria were either used immediately or flash-frozen with liquid N2 and stored at −80 °C. Mitoplasts (mitochondria without the outer mitochondrial membrane) for phospholipid analysis were prepared from purified mitochondria according to the protocol described in (10).

Purification of Mitochondrial Supercomplex III2IV2

Isolated mitochondria (8 mg of protein) were suspended in the 1 ml of lysis buffer containing 2% (w/v) digitonin (Invitrogen), 50 mm potassium acetate, 10% glycerol, 1:50 volume Protease Inhibitor mixture set III (Calbiochem), 1.5 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 30 mm HEPES-KOH (pH 7.4) for 1 h at 4 °C with gentle shaking. After incubation the lysate was centrifuged at 4 °C for 20 min at 45,000 rpm (TLA55 rotor), and the supernatant was incubated with 1 μl of TBS-equilibrated magnetized Cobalt Beads (Dynabeads TALON catalogue 101.02D, Invitrogen) per 2.2 μl of lysate to remove FoF1-ATPase. Incubation of 1 ml of lysate with magnetic beads was performed for 45 min at 4 °C with constant shaking. After incubation the beads were removed using a magnetic separator. The supernatant (1 ml) was immediately transferred to an 8 ml sucrose gradient (0.75 m to 1.5 m sucrose in 15 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 20 mm KCl, and 0.4% digitonin) and centrifuged at 4 °C for 20 h at 30,000 rpm (TLS-55 swinging bucket rotor). Fractions (80–100 μl) from the gradient were analyzed by Blue Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) and Western blotting.

Analysis of the Supercomplex

Aliquots of fractions obtained after sucrose gradient centrifugation were subjected to BN-PAGE in a 3–12% acrylamide gradient gel in Bis-Tris buffer (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer's instructions. After electrophoresis gels were either stained with Bio-Safe Coomassie G-250 (Bio-Rad) or used for Western blotting analysis as we described earlier (28) with primary monoclonal antibody (generous gift of Dr. Bernard L. Trumpower, Dartmouth University, Hanover, NH) to the Qcr7 subunit of complex III and secondary anti-mouse antibody (Stabilized Peroxidase Conjugate, Goat anti-mouse, Thermo Fisher). SuperSignal Western Femto Sensitivity kit was used to develop the signal, which was captured using a Fluro-S Max multi imager (29). For Western blotting with primary antibody against yeast cytochrome c (generous gift of Dr. Alexander Tzagoloff, Columbia University, New York, NY) followed by goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Stabilized Peroxidase Conjugate, goat anti-rabbit, Thermo Fisher), the purified supercomplex was separated by NuPAGE in a 4–12% acrylamide gradient gel in Bis-Tris buffer with NuPAGE MES SDS Running buffer (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Protein concentrations were determined using the BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific) according to manufacturer's instructions.

Measurements of Supercomplex Enzymatic Activity

Respiratory activity of the purified supercomplex III2IV2 was measured using a Clark oxygen electrode as KCN-sensitive oxygen consumption with NaBH4-reduced decylubiquinone (Sigma), QH2, as substrate at 30 °C. Rates were determined from the slope of a plot of O2 concentration versus time. Supercomplex purified in the sucrose gradient (about 55 μg of protein) was incubated in 50 mm Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.0, 100 mm KCl, 0.13 m sucrose, 0.05% digitonin in a final volume of 3 ml. QH2 (40 μm) was added to start the reaction, and oxygen consumption was stopped by addition of 50 μm KCN.

Phospholipid Extraction from Supercomplex for Mass Spectrometry

Phospholipids were extracted from the supercomplex and mitoplasts (∼20 μg of protein) with a mixture of methanol:chloroform:0.1 n HCl (containing 11 mm ammonium acetate) in a proportion of 1:1:0.9. Samples were vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged at 3000 × g. The organic layer was transferred to a glass tube and dried under a stream of N2. Dried phospholipid samples were resuspended in 100 μl of hexane-isopropanol (30:40. v/v) (30). For quantification of CL using mass spectrometry, 0.8 nmol of 1,1′, 2,2′-tetramyristoyl cardiolipin (CL (14:0)4) (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL) was added as an internal standard prior to extraction of lipids.

ESI-MS Analysis of CL

ESI-MS was performed as previously described (30). Samples for CL quantitation were injected into a normal-phase HPLC column (Luna 5 μm silica 100 Å, 2.0 × 150 mm column; Phenomenex) coupled to an API 3200 mass spectrometer running in negative ion mode. Negative ion ESI was carried out at −4,000 V, with declustering potential of −100 V, focusing potential of −350 V, and entrance potential of −10 V. The solvent system consisted of hexane:isopropanol:20 mm ammonium acetate in water, pH 5.5, in a ratio of 30:40:7 (v/v/v) for solvent A and hexane:isopropanol (30:40, v/v) for solvent B. In separate runs 0.34, 0.69 or 1.37 nmol of CL containing four oleic acids (CL (18:1)4) (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL) as a reference and 0.8 nmol of CL ((14:1)4) as an internal standard were used to establish the standard curve. There was a linear relationship between the ratio of the negative molecular ion ([M-H]−) current from CL (18:1)4 (reference standard), and the [M-H]− from the internal standard, CL (14:0)4, as a function of the concentration of CL (18:1)4. The nmol of individual molecular species of CL in analyzed samples of the supercomplex or mitoplasts were calculated by determining the ratio of the peak area of the CL molecular species of interest to the internal standard. This ratio, along with the slope and intercept of the standard curve made with reference standard CL (18:1)4 was used to calculate nmol of CL as described in (30). Total CL was determined as the sum of the most prevalent CL species. The value in nmol per mg of protein subjected to extraction was calculated. This number represents the number of CL molecules per mol of the supercomplex since 1 nmol of the supercomplex III2IV2 is about 1 mg.

Cryo-EM

Selected fractions containing the purified supercomplex III2IV2, were combined and used for cryo-EM. Samples were diluted 1:9 in 15 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, and 20 mm KCl buffer to reduce digitonin and sucrose concentrations and deposited on freshly glow discharged (2 min) Quantifoil holey carbon grids (West Chester, PA). Prior to glow discharge, the holey carbon grids were coated with a continuous thin carbon film that was prepared by evaporating carbon on a freshly cleaved mica sheet from a graphite rod using a Denton Vacuum DU-502A Evaporator. Grids were rapidly frozen in liquid ethane using a home made gravity-driven plunger apparatus. Cryo-frozen samples were imaged at liquid nitrogen temperature using a Polara 300 kV electron microscope (FEI Company) using a 4K × 4K CCD camera (TVIPS GmbH, Gauting, Germany). Images were recorded at low dose conditions at 3 to 7 μm underfocus and a ×39,000 nominal magnification.

Data Processing, Map Visualization, and Analysis

All image processing steps were done using the SPARX software package (31). From 200 micrographs a total of 23,715 particles were manually selected and windowed using e2boxer.py with a pixel size of 4.58 Å on the specimen scale. Class averages were calculated using the Iterative Stable Alignment and Clustering (ISAC) program, from which 252 averages were produced (32). By visual inspection, we selected from this set a subset of 230 plausible views of the supercomplex III2IV2.

An initial model was calculated with the three-dimensional projection matching method using the selected class averages and starting from a template structure constructed using the electron density map obtained from the atomic model of S. cerevisiae complex III (PDB accession number 1KYO) embedded in an oblate spheroid (lens-shape) representing the undefined position of two complexes IV in the supercomplex (see Fig. 1). Prior to conversion to an electron density map, the PDB file of the yeast cytochrome bc1 complex (complex III) was modified by removing chains j, u, k, v, and w. Subsequently, individual projection image-based three-dimensional projection alignment was carried out with enforcement of C2 symmetry of the structure and starting from the model obtained from class averages. Finally, images whose projection directions (as determined by the refinement) were over-represented were removed to obtain a subset of 7,824 images with approximately evenly distributed projection directions and the refinement was continued until we obtained a stable three-dimensional structure at a resolution of 24 Å, as determined by the FSC @ 0.5 test (33). During the refinement the power spectrum of the structure was adjusted to match that of the electron density map calculated from the atomic model of yeast cytochrome bc1 complex and low-pass filtered with frequency cut-off calculated from the FSC curve. The atomic models of S. cerevisiae complex III (PDB accession numbers 1KYO or 3CX5, both giving the same results) and bovine complex IV (PDB accession number 1OCC) were used for modeling the supercomplex structure. For the former case the PDB file was modified by removing the antibody fragment chains and, unless otherwise indicated, the cytochrome c (chain w) structure; subunit Qcr10p is not present in the PDB file since it was lost prior to structural determination. Only a monomer of the dimeric bovine complex IV was used while chains K and M not present in yeast were removed. The initial approximate placement of each x-ray structure in the supercomplex EM density map was done manually based on distinct structural features and subsequently refined using the UCSF Chimera program by maximization of the local correlation coefficient between the two maps (34).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Complex III-oblate spheroid reference model. Beginning with the electron density map of complex III obtained from the atomic model of S. cerevisiae complex III (PDB accession number 1KYO) and an oblate spheroid as a reference structure, a three-dimensional reconstruction was generated from averages. The horizontal lines indicate the known location of the membrane (MEM) bilayer relative to complex III. The orientation of complex III with respect to the inter-membrane space (IMS) and mitochondrial matrix (MA) is also shown.

RESULTS

Purification of the III2IV2 Supercomplex

The approach used previously (35) was modified for purification of the active supercomplex III2IV2. Extraction of the supercomplex by digitonin and purification using sucrose gradient centrifugation resulted in contamination of the supercomplex with the FoF1-ATPase dimer, which has a similar molecular mass. To decrease this contamination, the ratio of digitonin to the protein previously used was 6:1 (wt/wt) to induce dissociation of the FoF1-ATPase dimer to monomers. However, these conditions also increased the level of the III2IV supercomplex trimer, which could not be completely separated from the intact supercomplex in the sucrose gradient (35). Several modifications of the published method were made to eliminate the above contaminants thus improving the quality of material subjected to cryo-EM. Strain USY00b expresses a His6-tagged β-subunit of FoF1-ATPase, which was easily removed by incubation of the digitonin extract with cobalt affinity beads. The strain was grown on lactate-containing media with intense aeration, which resulted in high levels of the III2IV2 supercomplex and greatly reduced levels of the III2IV supercomplex trimer due to higher level of expression of complex IV (24). For extraction of the supercomplex, a ratio of digitonin to protein of 2.5:1 (wt/wt) was used, which also reduced the latter contaminant. Purification of the digitonin extract of mitochondria by sucrose gradient centrifugation after removing FoF1-ATPase with cobalt beads resulted in samples containing highly purified III2IV2 supercomplex (Fig. 2A).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Purification, activity, and imaging of III2IV2 supercomplex. A, BN-PAGE of alternating fractions from the sucrose gradient (numbered from the bottom to the top of the gradient) containing III2IV2 supercomplex (marked) were combined for cryo-EM sample preparation. The longer arrow indicates III2IV2, and the shorter one shows traces of III2IV. B, activity of combined fractions. The recorded track represents oxygen consumption measured by a Clark electrode upon oxidation of QH2 by the III2IV2 supercomplex in a KCN-dependent manner (see “Materials and Methods” for details). C, cryo-electron micrograph of the purified III2IV2 supercomplex. Scale bar is 100 nm. D and E, show two out of 230 selected class averages (contrast inverted) top view (MA) and side view, respectively (see Fig. 3). Scale bar is 10 nm.

It was previously demonstrated that the purified mammalian respirasome contained bound CoQ and cytochrome c (20, 36) and can perform NADH oxidation without addition of any external cytochrome c (36). According to negative stain EM and single particle analysis, some percentage of the yeast supercomplex population of the sample purified using a sucrose gradient appears to contain attached cytochrome c (26). SDS-PAGE followed by Western blot analysis with antibody to cytochrome c confirmed the presence of cytochrome c in our purified supercomplex samples (8 different purifications). Since III2IV2 represents a part of respirasome lacking dehydrogenases, QH2 was used to donate electrons to complex III (Complex III contains bound CoQ). Oxygen consumption upon oxidation of QH2 by the purified supercomplex (Fig. 2B) was recorded without any addition of the external cytochrome c. The process was completely inhibited by 50 μm of KCN, an inhibitor of the complex IV. Activity of the supercomplex sample calculated from the data presented in Fig. 2B was about 240 nmol of O2 min−1 per mg of protein. Taking into account that the concentration of the supercomplex used in this experiment was about 18 μg per ml (or 18 nm) and that cytochrome c was at sub-saturating levels with respect to the supercomplex, we concluded that the recorded reaction was supported by the channeling of cytochrome c between complexes III and IV in the supercomplex and represents activity of the fraction of supercomplex containing bound cytochrome c. Activity of the supercomplex upon addition of 50 μm of cytochrome c was about 1 μmol of O2 min−1 per mg of protein, which is comparable with published results (24).

EM and Image Processing

A total of 23,715 particle images of the purified active III2IV2 supercomplex were manually selected from 200 micrographs and a total of 252 class averages were calculated from which 230 averages were selected; see Fig. 2 for a typical micrograph. An initial model for projection image-based three-dimensional refinement was determined using an approach based on calculating a three-dimensional map from the 230 selected averages, for which the three-dimensional projection-matching strategy with enforcement of C2 symmetry was employed (37). The reference structure for the procedure was constructed to avoid introducing any bias in the orientation between complexes III and IV in the reconstructed map. Toward this end, we obtained the reference structure by combining the electron density map of complex III converted from the atomic model of yeast cytochrome bc1 complex and an oblate spheroid as described in “Materials and Methods” (Fig. 1). Furthermore, to determine the self-consistency and reproducibility of the three-dimensional maps computed by this approach, we made ten noise-corrupted models of the oblate spheroid model. Each of the ten noisy models was used as the initial template for three-dimensional projection alignment of the set of 230 selected averages. The resulting ten three-dimensional maps were similar demonstrating that orientation between complexes III and IV was reliably established using this approach. Using the initial model as a starting structure and a subset of projection images (see “Materials and Methods” for details), a three-dimensional map (Fig. 3, A–D) with a resolution of 24 Å was obtained.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Cryo-EM three-dimensional map of the III2IV2 supercomplex. A, side or transmembrane view where the upper part is facing MA and the lower part is facing the IMS. The approximate position of the membrane lipid bilayer is shown. B, end view where A is rotated 90° around the axis that is perpendicular to the plane of the MEM. C, top view from the MA. D, bottom view from the IMS.

A pseudo-atomic model of the three-dimensional structure of the supercomplex was constructed by superimposing the x-ray structures of complex III (S. cerevisiae, PDB 3CX5) and complex IV (bovine, PDB 1OCC, monomer) (Fig. 4). The protruding densities at the top center of the supercomplex correspond to the position of Cor1 and Cor2 subunits in complex III (Figs. 4A and 5A). Our three-dimensional map (Fig. 4) and the derived pseudo-atomic model (Fig. 5) confirm the previously suggested overall organization of the S. cerevisiae supercomplex, which was based on an arrangement inferred from two-dimensional class averages obtained by processing of negative stain data (26). The main finding was that each of the two individual complexes IV interacts with complex III through convex surface of IV, which is opposite to the interaction surface between the cytochrome c oxidase monomers in the dimer of complex IV present in the crystal structure (38). However, the three-dimensional structure obtained by cryo-EM suggests some differences in orientation of IV relative to III (Fig. 5) compared with conclusions based on the two-dimensional work (26). The distance between cytochrome c binding sites on cytochrome c1 subunit of complex III and subunit II of complex IV is about 6 nm (Fig. 5) versus 4.0 nm as previously reported. This larger distance would still enable channeling of cytochrome c between these sites in the supercomplex. Complexes III and IV are closer to each other at the aqueous-membrane interface exposed to the mitochondrial inter-membrane space, while larger spacing between III and IV that is seen in the hydrophobic lipid bilayer is consistent with what is observed in the bovine supercomplex (20, 22). This “gap” (spacing) is sufficiently spacious for insertion of lipids between the individual complexes in the supercomplex.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Three-dimensional map of the III2IV2 supercomplex with fitted x-ray crystal structures of the complexes III (S. cerevisiae, PDB 3CX5, blue) and IV (bovine, PDB 1OCC, magenta). Views presented in A, B, C, and D are as indicated in Fig. 3, respectively.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Pseudo-atomic model of the III2IV2 supercomplex showing the arrangement of the complexes III and IV in the supercomplex structure. A, B, and C show side view, view from the MA, and view from the IMS, respectively. Complex III: Cor1, dim gray; Cor2, dark gray; cytochrome b, light sea green; Rieske protein, red; cytochrome c1, dark blue; Qcr6p, green; Qcr7p, light gray; Qcr8p, black; Qcr9p, orange; CL (CN3), yellow. Complex IV: subunit I (Cox1p, yeast), cornflower blue; subunit II (Cox2p, yeast), bright green; subunit 3 (Cox3p yeast), hot pink; subunit IV (pp, yeast), magenta; subunit VIa (Cox10p), cyan. All other subunits of Complex IV are in light brown. Horizontal lines in A indicate the position of phospholipid bilayer with MEM, MA, and IMS as indicated in Fig. 3. The lines in A and C connecting complexes III and IV show the distance between cytochrome c binding sites on complexes III and IV.

Determination and Quantification of CL in the Supercomplex

The phospholipid CL is required for formation of the stable III2IV2 supercomplex (10, 14, 15) and therefore should be associated with the supercomplex. We determined the number of CL molecules and their fatty acid species distribution in the supercomplex. CL associated with the purified supercomplex showed the same proportion between the five major CL species (with values of singly ionized CL of m/z 1,344, 1,372, 1,400, 1,428, and 1,456) as CL found in mitoplasts (representing the inner mitochondrial membrane) (Fig. 6). These numbers correspond to CL species with acyl chains (16:1)4, (16:1)3(18:1)1, (16:1)2 (18:1)2, and (18:1)4, respectively. Thus the major CL species contain only monounsaturated 16:1 and 18:1 acyl chains, which corresponds to published results for yeast mitochondria (39). Total CL was determined as the sum of these five prevalent species. By using CL (14:0)4 as an internal standard and CL (18:1)4 as a reference standard (see “Materials and Methods”) 40–60 mol of CL per mol of the yeast supercomplex were determined in two independent experiments.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

CL species in the III2IV2 supercomplex and inner mitochondrial membrane determined by ESI-MS. Total CL was determined as the sum of the five prevalent CL species (as indicated) with values of singly ionized CL. Mitoplasts were used for determination of CL in the inner mitochondrial membrane. Data represent results of two independent experiments, with the bars indicating standard deviations.

DISCUSSION

Analysis of the yeast supercomplex reported here began with more highly purified samples in which the supercomplex trimer lacking one complex IV and the FoF1-ATPase dimer, significantly present in the earlier report from yeast (26), were minimized. This improvement allowed us to collect enough particle images in different orientations to reconstruct a three-dimensional cryo-EM map of the supercomplex. The final three-dimensional structure shows that the orientation of complex IV relative to complex III is similar but not identical to that inferred from the analysis of the two-dimensional negative stain EM averages of yeast data (26). One complex IV flanks each side of complex III, and the convex side opposite to the complex IV dimer interface found in the x-ray structure opposes complex III. However, we established reliably that there are major differences between the yeast and bovine supercomplex in the orientation of complex III relative to complex IV.

The surface of complex IV that faces complex III in the bovine structure differs significantly from the surface of complex IV that faces complex III in the yeast complex (see arrows in Fig. 7); see Tables 3 and 5 in Ref. 4 for nomenclature of homologous subunits between yeast and bovine heart complexes. The yeast complexes IV interface with complex III on the sides opposite the interface between monomers of the complex III. In the bovine supercomplex the interface of complex IV with complex III is at the periphery of the interface between monomers of the complex III (Fig. 7), which also significantly differs from the arrangement in yeast. In more detail bovine cytochrome b, Rieske protein, and subunit 11 of one monomer of complex III are in close proximity to subunits III, Via, and VIIIa of complex IV. The cytochrome c1 subunits of both monomers are not proximal to the complex III-IV interface (20, 22). In yeast the Rieske protein (its flexible domain facing the inter-membrane space) and cytochrome b are not close to complex IV. The face of complex IV containing the yeast homologues of bovine subunits III (Cox3p) and VIa (Cox10p, encoded by COX13) do not make contact with complex III (Figs. 5 and 7); there is no homologue of subunit VIIIa in yeast. The Qcr10 subunit (homologue of bovine subunit 11) was removed from the yeast complex III during purification (40, 41) and is not represented in the crystal structure. However, precise conclusions about the organization of complex IV subunits on the interface with complex III will be possible only when the crystal structure of the yeast complex is available.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7.

Comparison of the arrangement of complexes III and IV in the supercomplex in the yeast and bovine mitochondria. A, III2IV2 supercomplex from S. cerevisiae; (B) the bovine respirasome sub-fragment composed of III2 and one IV. Both structures are viewed from the IMS. Crystal structures of complexes III and IV are in gray color except for cytochrome c1 colored in blue, and subunit II of complex IV is in dark green. The distance between cytochrome c binding sites of complexes III and IV is indicated in both structures by purple dashed line (6 nm in A and 10 nm in B). Image of bovine supercomplex is adopted from Ref. 22 and reprinted with permission, 2011 National Academy of Sciences USA. The black arrow on the image of the III2IV2 supercomplex from yeast (A) points to the approximate region of complex IV that interacts with complex III in the bovine supercomplex. The black arrow on the image of bovine III2IV structure (B) points to the approximate region of complex IV that interacts with complex III in the yeast supercomplex. The red arrows indicate the position of the interface between the two monomers of complex III

The differences between the organization of the bovine and yeast respirasomes most likely stem from the necessity in mammals of complex III to interact with both complexes I and IV. In yeast where no complex I exits, two complex IV monomers flank complex III. Absence in yeast of a subunit homologous to VIIIa, which is located at the interface between complexes III and IV in the bovine supercomplex, is probably relevant to the differences between yeast and bovine in the mutual orientation of the individual complexes. Within the yeast supercomplex the closest distance between the individual complexes is between complex III subunit Qcr6p and a domain of complex IV subunit IV (corresponds to Cox5ap in yeast), which are exposed to the inter-membrane space (Fig. 5). In the both yeast and bovine there are larger spaces between subunits of complexes III and subunits of complex IV in the hydrophobic bilayer, and these “gaps” are most likely filled with lipids (see below).

The distance reported here between cytochrome c binding sites on cytochrome c1 subunit of complex III and subunit II (Cox2p) of complex IV, which contains the first electron acceptor (CuA cofactor) of complex IV, is about 6 nm (Figs. 5 and 7A). This is a longer distance than that (about 4 nm) estimated from the pseudo-atomic model of the supercomplex created from negative stain data (26). However, the larger distance is still consistent with the possibility of direct channeling of cytochrome c between its respective binding sites on complexes III and IV. Our measurement of the KCN-dependent oxygen consumption by the supercomplex upon oxidation of QH2 without addition of any external cytochrome c supports this possibility. Previously, oxygen consumption without external cytochrome c was demonstrated with isolated respirasomes from mitochondria of mouse fibroblast cells (36), which is also consistent with channeling of cytochrome c. In the bovine supercomplex the distances between the cytochrome c binding site in complex IV and cytochrome c binding sites on each cytochromes c1 monomers of complex III were estimated to be about 10–11 nm (20, 22) (Fig. 7B). Interestingly, one group considers this relatively long distance as an indication that no channeling of cytochrome c takes place (22), while another group, taking into account the diameter of cytochrome c of about 3.4 nm, proposes direct channeling of cytochrome c between complexes III and IV is still possible (20).

In the discussion of the structure of S. cerevisiae supercomplex obtained by negative stain, the authors suggested that some particles contain bound cytochrome c and that its “fuzzy” appearance in the two-dimensional class average might be due to flexibility upon binding resulting in an intermediate position of cytochrome c between its respective binding sites on complex III and complex IV. They also suggested that in order to mediate electron transfer, cytochrome c would have to rotate and move between these complexes (26). Subunits like the hinge protein (Qcr6p) of complex III, which was found to be essential for a binding of cytochrome c to complex III, can be important for transfer of cytochrome c from complex III to complex IV (26). Our structural findings and activity measurements are in a good agreement with these suggestions. Interestingly, our three-dimensional density map has a protrusion on the surface of the supercomplex facing the inter-membrane space at the position between cytochrome c binding sites on complexes III and IV in the close contact with Qcr6p (Fig. 8). The dimensions of the protrusion are close to the dimensions of cytochrome c. Further experiments are required to establish whether the indicated protrusion represents cytochrome c attached to the supercomplex and how cytochrome c channeling occurs in the supercomplex.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8.

Hypothetical channeling of cytochrome c between complexes III and IV in the yeast supercomplex. Part of the density map of the supercomplex showing the protrusion (indicated by black arrow) to the right of cytochrome c (red) (chain w of complex III, PDB 3CX5). Complex III is in light yellow except for Qcr6p in light blue. Complex IV is in magenta except with subunit II (Cox2p in yeast) in dark blue, subunit IV (Cox5ap in yeast) in bright yellow. CuA, the first electron acceptor in complex IV, is indicated. The inset shows the same protrusion (black arrow) from a different angle.

We found about 50 molecules of CL per molecule of the supercomplex. Our results are consistent with the finding that CL is required for formation and stabilization of the S. cerevisiae III2IV2 supercomplex (10, 14, 15). Tightly bound CL in the crystal structure of the yeast complex III (CL denoted as CN3 in PDB 3CX5 and shown in Fig. 5) was demonstrated to be important for supercomplex stability (16). Although this tightly bound CL is necessary for supercomplex formation, it is probably not sufficient for stable supercomplex formation. There are “gaps” between complex III and complex IV in the supercomplex residing in the hydrophobic bilayer of the membrane, which are most likely filled with lipid including CL. Reconstitution of the supercomplex from purified complex III (which contains only tightly bound CL) and complex IV requires the addition of CL.6 The bovine respirasome contains 200–400 molecules of CL (20). The space between complexes III and IV in yeast is smaller than inter-complex space in the bovine respirasome and the large complex I might contain many CL molecules (20, 22). Thus the lower numbers for CL molecules in the yeast complex is not surprising. CL accumulated in the space between complexes in the supercomplex might play a role in triggering supercomplex dissociation under conditions where CL levels are reduced by either growth conditions or peroxidation. The definite elucidation of CL-dependent dynamics of the supercomplex organization will require further studies.

Recent reports indicate that in addition to CL two related proteins, Rcf1 and Rcf2, are also important for supercomplex formation and stability (42–44). These are small proteins of about 20 kDa containing two transmembrane domains. Rcf1 has a predicted long coiled coil extramembrane domain, which may not contribute significant electron density. On the other hand, we cannot exclude the possibility that several Rcf1 proteins can provide a connection between individual complexes through an interaction of their coiled coil domains exposed to the inter-membrane space. Since digitonin extracted supercomplex contains these proteins (42–44), they must be present in our purified supercomplex and for example may be responsible for the protrusion exposed to the inter-membrane space. Further structural studies are required to identify the location of the Rcf proteins in the supercomplex structure.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Richard Kulmacz for use of his Clark electrode and Drs. Srinivas Mullapudi and Jun Liu for assistance with operation of the Polara electron microscope, which is supported in part, through the Structural Biology Imaging Center at UTHSC-Houston. We thank Dr. Robert Murphy for the use of the LIPID MAPS mass spectrometry facility at the University of Colorado at Denver, which is supported by the National Institutes of Health Large Scale Collaborative Grant GM-069338. The Texas Advanced Computing Center at The University of Texas at Austin provided high performance computing resources for this project.

*

This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant GM R01 56389 and the John Dunn Research Foundation (to W. D.), National Institutes of Health Grant GM R01 60635 (to P. A. P.).

4

Complex III in eukaryotes is a structural and functional dimer of two ubiqunol:cytochrome c oxidoreductase multisubunit enzymes and when in a supercomplex is referred to as III2.

6

S. Bazan, E. Mileykovskaya, and W. Dowhan, personnel communication.

5
The abbreviations used are:
CL
cardiolipin
ESI-MS
electrospray ionization mass spectrometry
BN-PAGE
Blue Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
MEM
membrane
IMS
intermembrane space
MA
matrix
EM
electron microscopy.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Schägger H. (2001) Respiratory chain supercomplexes. IUBMB Life 52, 119–128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Stuart R. A. (2008) Supercomplex organization of the oxidative phosphorylation enzymes in yeast mitochondria. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 40, 411–417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wittig I., Schägger H. (2009) Supramolecular organization of ATP synthase and respiratory chain in mitochondrial membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1787, 672–680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lenaz G., Genova M. L. (2010) Structure and organization of mitochondrial respiratory complexes: a new understanding of an old subject. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 12, 961–1008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Dudkina N. V., Kouril R., Peters K., Braun H. P., Boekema E. J. (2010) Structure and function of mitochondrial supercomplexes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1797, 664–670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Yamashita T., Nakamaru-Ogiso E., Miyoshi H., Matsuno-Yagi A., Yagi T. (2007) Roles of bound quinone in the single subunit NADH-quinone oxidoreductase (Ndi1) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 6012–6020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Piccoli C., Scrima R., Boffoli D., Capitanio N. (2006) Control by cytochrome c oxidase of the cellular oxidative phosphorylation system depends on the mitochondrial energy state. Biochem. J. 396, 573–583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lenaz G., Genova M. L. (2009) Structural and functional organization of the mitochondrial respiratory chain: a dynamic super-assembly. Int J Biochem. Cell Biol. 41, 1750–1772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Boumans H., Grivell L. A., Berden J. A. (1998) The respiratory chain in yeast behaves as a single functional unit. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4872–4877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhang M., Mileykovskaya E., Dowhan W. (2005) Cardiolipin is essential for organization of complexes III and IV into a supercomplex in intact yeast mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 29403–29408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lange C., Nett J. H., Trumpower B. L., Hunte C. (2001) Specific roles of protein-phospholipid interactions in the yeast cytochrome bc1 complex structure. EMBO J. 20, 6591–6600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Palsdottir H., Hunte C. (2004) Lipids in membrane protein structures. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1666, 2–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Shinzawa-Itoh K., Aoyama H., Muramoto K., Terada H., Kurauchi T., Tadehara Y., Yamasaki A., Sugimura T., Kurono S., Tsujimoto K., Mizushima T., Yamashita E., Tsukihara T., Yoshikawa S. (2007) Structures and physiological roles of 13 integral lipids of bovine heart cytochrome c oxidase. EMBO J. 26, 1713–1725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhang M., Mileykovskaya E., Dowhan W. (2002) Gluing the respiratory chain together. Cardiolipin is required for supercomplex formation in the inner mitochondrial membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 43553–43556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Pfeiffer K., Gohil V., Stuart R. A., Hunte C., Brandt U., Greenberg M. L., Schägger H. (2003) Cardiolipin stabilizes respiratory chain supercomplexes. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 52873–52880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wenz T., Hielscher R., Hellwig P., Schägger H., Richers S., Hunte C. (2009) Role of phospholipids in respiratory cytochrome bc(1) complex catalysis and supercomplex formation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1787, 609–616 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. McKenzie M., Lazarou M., Thorburn D. R., Ryan M. T. (2006) Mitochondrial respiratory chain supercomplexes are destabilized in Barth Syndrome patients. J. Mol. Biol. 361, 462–469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Brandner K., Mick D. U., Frazier A. E., Taylor R. D., Meisinger C., Rehling P. (2005) Taz1, an outer mitochondrial membrane protein, affects stability and assembly of inner membrane protein complexes: implications for Barth Syndrome. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 5202–5214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Claypool S. M., Oktay Y., Boontheung P., Loo J. A., Koehler C. M. (2008) Cardiolipin defines the interactome of the major ADP/ATP carrier protein of the mitochondrial inner membrane. J. Cell Biol. 182, 937–950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Althoff T., Mills D. J., Popot J. L., Kühlbrandt W. (2011) Arrangement of electron transport chain components in bovine mitochondrial supercomplex I(1)III(2)IV(1). EMBO J. 30, 4652–4664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mileykovskaya E., Dowhan W. (2009) Cardiolipin membrane domains in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1788, 2084–2091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Dudkina N. V., Kudryashev M., Stahlberg H., Boekema E. J. (2011) Interaction of complexes I, III, and IV within the bovine respirasome by single particle cryoelectron tomography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 15196–15200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Schäfer E., Dencher N. A., Vonck J., Parcej D. N. (2007) Three-dimensional structure of the respiratory chain supercomplex I1III2IV1 from bovine heart mitochondria. Biochemistry 46, 12579–12585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Schägger H., Pfeiffer K. (2000) Supercomplexes in the respiratory chains of yeast and mammalian mitochondria. EMBO J. 19, 1777–1783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Cruciat C. M., Brunner S., Baumann F., Neupert W., Stuart R. A. (2000) The cytochrome bc1 and cytochrome c oxidase complexes associate to form a single supracomplex in yeast mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18093–18098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Heinemeyer J., Braun H. P., Boekema E. J., Kouril R. (2007) A structural model of the cytochrome c reductase/oxidase supercomplex from yeast mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 12240–12248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Mueller D. M., Puri N., Kabaleeswaran V., Terry C., Leslie A. G., Walker J. E. (2004) Ni-chelate-affinity purification and crystallization of the yeast mitochondrial F1-ATPase. Protein Expr. Purif. 37, 479–485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zhang M., Su X., Mileykovskaya E., Amoscato A. A., Dowhan W. (2003) Cardiolipin is not required to maintain mitochondrial DNA stability or cell viability for Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown at elevated temperatures. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 35204–35210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bogdanov M., Xie J., Heacock P., Dowhan W. (2008) To flip or not to flip: lipid-protein charge interactions are a determinant of final membrane protein topology. J. Cell Biol. 182, 925–935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sparagna G. C., Johnson C. A., McCune S. A., Moore R. L., Murphy R. C. (2005) Quantitation of cardiolipin molecular species in spontaneously hypertensive heart failure rats using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Lipid Res. 46, 1196–1204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Hohn M., Tang G., Goodyear G., Baldwin P. R., Huang Z., Penczek P. A., Yang C., Glaeser R. M., Adams P. D., Ludtke S. J. (2007) SPARX, a new environment for Cryo-EM image processing. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 47–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Yang Z., Fang J., Chittuluru J., Asturias F., Penczek P. (2012) Iterative stable alignment and clustering of 2D transmission electron microscope images. Structure 8, 237–247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Saxton W. O., Baumeister W. (1982) The correlation averaging of a regularly arranged bacterial cell envelope protein. J. Microsc. 127, 127–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Pettersen E. F., Goddard T. D., Huang C. C., Couch G. S., Greenblatt D. M., Meng E. C., Ferrin T. E. (2004) UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Braun H. P., Sunderhaus S., Boekema E. J., Kouril R. (2009) Chapter 10 Purification of the cytochrome c reductase/cytochrome c oxidase super complex of yeast mitochondria. Methods Enzymol. 456, 183–190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Acín-Pérez R., Fernández-Silva P., Peleato M. L., Pérez-Martos A., Enriquez J. A. (2008) Respiratory active mitochondrial supercomplexes. Mol. Cell 32, 529–539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Penczek P. A., Grassucci R. A., Frank J. (1994) The ribosome at improved resolution: new techniques for merging and orientation refinement in three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopy of biological particles. Ultramicroscopy 53, 251–270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Tsukihara T., Aoyama H., Yamashita E., Tomizaki T., Yamaguchi H., Shinzawa-Itoh K., Nakashima R., Yaono R., Yoshikawa S. (1996) The whole structure of the 13-subunit oxidized cytochrome c oxidase at 2.8 A. Science 272, 1136–1144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Schlame M., Brody S., Hostetler K. Y. (1993) Mitochondrial cardiolipin in diverse eukaryotes. Comparison of biosynthetic reactions and molecular acyl species. Eur. J. Biochem. 212, 727–735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lange C., Hunte C. (2002) Crystal structure of the yeast cytochrome bc1 complex with its bound substrate cytochrome c. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 2800–2805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Solmaz S. R., Hunte C. (2008) Structure of complex III with bound cytochrome c in reduced state and definition of a minimal core interface for electron transfer. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 17542–17549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Strogolova V., Furness A., Robb-McGrath M., Garlich J., Stuart R. A. (2012) Rcf1 and Rcf2, members of the hypoxia induced gene 1 protein family, are critical components of the mitochondrial cytochrome bc1-cytochrome c oxidase supercomplex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 1363–1373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Vukotic M., Oeljeklaus S., Wiese S., Vögtle F. N., Meisinger C., Meyer H. E., Zieseniss A., Katschinski D. M., Jans D. C., Jakobs S., Warscheid B., Rehling P., Deckers M. (2012) Rcf1 mediates cytochrome oxidase assembly and respirasome formation, revealing heterogeneity of the enzyme complex. Cell Metab. 15, 336–347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Chen Y. C., Taylor E. B., Dephoure N., Heo J. M., Tonhato A., Papandreou I., Nath N., Denko N. C., Gygi S. P., Rutter J. (2012) Identification of a protein mediating respiratory supercomplex stability. Cell Metab. 15, 348–360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES