Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Apr 16;80(3):450–464. doi: 10.1037/a0028176

Table 3.

Proportion of counselors randomized to one of three training conditions meeting thresholds for proficiency on Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) scores across both week 8 and week 20 follow up assessments.

MITI Proficiency Threshold Training Condition
Workshop Only Tape-based Supervision Tele-conferencing Supervision Chi-square (df = 2)
Spirit and Empathy scores = 5 or bettera 30% (8/27) 46% (11/24) 50% (12/24) 2.47, p = .291
Spirit and Empathy scores = 6 or bettera 0% (0/27) 13% (3/24) 25% (6/24) p = .017b
MI non-adherent count = 0 37% (10/27) 67% (16/24) 65% (15/23) 5.82, p = .058
MI adherentc 100% 33% (7/21) 53% (9/17) 50% (8/16) 1.15, p = .417

Note. Totals in the denominators vary due to missing data.

a

Scores of 5 are considered a beginner level of proficiency on the MITI; scores of 6 or 7 are considered to be in the competent range.

b

Fisher's Exact test calculated due to low expected frequencies.

c

MI Adherent percentage = 100 × MIA count/(MIA count + MINA count); cases where both MIA and MINA counts equal zero are undefined, because the denominator is zero, so these are not included, contributing to missing data.