Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Sep 17;50(4):499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.014

Table 2.

F and p values for the interaction tests comparing the within- and between-condition correlation values for pairs of conditions that differ along the lexical dimension (i.e., S vs. J and W vs. N), and pairs of conditions that differ along the syntactic dimension (i.e., S vs. W and J vs. N). Asterisks indicate the comparisons that survive the FDR correction for the number of ROIs.

Interaction statistics
LIFGorb F(3,22)=1.45; n.s.
LIFG F(3,22)=4.49; p<05*
LMFG F(3,22)=4.03; p<05*
LSFG F(3,22)=1.44; n.s.
LAntTemp F(3,22)=4.53; p<05*
LMidAntTemp F(3,22)=6.54; p<005*
LMidPostTemp F(3,22)=8.19; p<005*
LPostTemp F(3,22)=10.5; p<001*
LAngG F(3,22)=12; p<001*
RMidAntTemp F(3,22)=1.95; n.s.
RMidPostTemp F(3,22)=2.72; p=07
RCereb F(3,22)=3.84; p<05*
LCereb F(3,22)=3.22; p<05