Table 2.
Comparison of TASSERVMT with pro-sp3-TASSER on the 1192 protein benchmark set.
| 874 Easy targets# | 318 Hard targets | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative GDT-TS | p-value* | Cumulative GDT-TS§ | p-value | |
| TASSERVMT | 615.27 | - | 100.36 (85) | - |
| pro-sp3-TASSER | 594.62 | 7.7×10−20 | 96.22 (61) | 1.9×10−4 |
#
A target is defined as Easy if the TM-score to native of the first model by at least one of the two methods is higher than 0.5; otherwise, it is classified as Hard.
*
Two-sided p-value of the Student-t test between TASSERVMT and pro-sp3-TASSER. A p-value of ≤0.05 is considered statistically significant.
§
Numbers in brackets are the foldabilities defined as the number of targets having a first model TM-score to native ≥0.4.