Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2011 Dec 5;108(51):20748–20753. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113801108

Discordant antigenic drift of neuraminidase and hemagglutinin in H1N1 and H3N2 influenza viruses

Matthew R Sandbulte a, Kim B Westgeest b, Jin Gao a, Xiyan Xu c, Alexander I Klimov c, Colin A Russell d,e, David F Burke d, Derek J Smith b,d,e, Ron A M Fouchier b, Maryna C Eichelberger a,1
PMCID: PMC3251064  PMID: 22143798

Abstract

Seasonal epidemics caused by influenza virus are driven by antigenic changes (drift) in viral surface glycoproteins that allow evasion from preexisting humoral immunity. Antigenic drift is a feature of not only the hemagglutinin (HA), but also of neuraminidase (NA). We have evaluated the antigenic evolution of each protein in H1N1 and H3N2 viruses used in vaccine formulations during the last 15 y by analysis of HA and NA inhibition titers and antigenic cartography. As previously shown for HA, genetic changes in NA did not always lead to an antigenic change. The noncontinuous pattern of NA drift did not correspond closely with HA drift in either subtype. Although NA drift was demonstrated using ferret sera, we show that these changes also impact recognition by NA-inhibiting antibodies in human sera. Remarkably, a single point mutation in the NA of A/Brisbane/59/2007 was primarily responsible for the lack of inhibition by polyclonal antibodies specific for earlier strains. These data underscore the importance of NA inhibition testing to define antigenic drift when there are sequence changes in NA.


Susceptibility to infection with circulating influenza viruses is determined to a large degree by the presence or absence of strain-specific functional antibodies elicited by prior infection or vaccination. Influenza viruses constantly evade antibody-mediated inhibition of replication by antigenic drift, an accumulation of mutations in epitopes of major surface proteins, HA and neuraminidase (NA) (1). Antigenic drift has been studied most extensively for HA, although NA has also been observed to undergo antigenic drift (2–4). NA-specific antibodies can reduce viral replication and disease severity in mice (5) and chickens (6), and have similarly been associated with resistance against influenza in humans (7, 8). Despite this correlation with immunity, antigenic drift of NA is not routinely examined. Early studies with a few virus strains demonstrated discordant antigenic drift of HA and NA (4), suggesting the virus can overcome host antibody resistance by modifying either antigen. Although it is likely that NA's drift is most often the result of antibody selection, antigenic change may on occasion be a consequence of a functional change in HA (9).

Vigilant surveillance by public health agencies is required to maximize the match between seasonal vaccine antigens and predominant circulating viruses (10, 11). At present, vaccine strain-selection decisions are based on antigenic characterization of HA coupled with HA and NA genetic data, also taking into consideration epidemiologic and human serologic data (11). Antigenic cartography using data from HA inhibition (HI) assays provides a tool to visualize and quantitate antigenic relatedness of the HAs of circulating viruses (12) in relation to vaccine viruses. Antigenic characterization of NA can be performed using NA inhibition (NI) assays to determine the extent of antibody-mediated interference with enzyme activity (13), but the cumbersome nature of the standard NI assay using large volumes of hazardous chemicals has precluded routine analysis of NA. We recently developed a miniaturized format of this assay and confirmed its accuracy and sensitivity for analysis of NI antibody titers in human and animal sera (14). In the present study, we use this assay to characterize the antigenic drift of NA in human H1N1 and H3N2 viruses recommended for United States influenza vaccines over the past ∼15 y (Table S1). In the NI assay, we used panels of ferret antisera against each wild-type H1N1 and H3N2 virus and virus reassortants generated by reverse genetics to combine the targeted NA and a mismatched HA of the H6 subtype. Use of these reassortants prevented false NI signals because of interfering HA antibodies. We then constructed antigenic maps from the datasets, using multidimensional scaling to position the antigens and antisera on the map, as previously described (12).

Results and Discussion

Antigenic Characterization of the HA and NA of H1N1 and H3N2 Viruses.

H6 reassortant viruses containing NA of historical as well as recent H1N1 and H3N2 vaccine viruses (Table S1) were used to measure NI titers of strain-specific ferret antisera. There was minimal NI cross-reactivity between the phylogenetically distant early NAs and antisera raised against recent seasonal strains of the classical H1N1 (Table S2) and H3N2 (Table S3) human lineages, demonstrating extensive antigenic drift since introduction of these subtypes. Ferret serum raised against A/California/7/2009 (CA/09), a representative 2009 H1N1 pandemic (H1N1pdm) virus, demonstrated a robust homologous NI antibody titer with very low cross-reactive titers against NAs of the long-established human seasonal H1N1 lineage (Table S2).

Phylogenetic trees, genetic maps based on amino acid sequences, and antigenic maps were generated for HA and NA of H1N1 (Fig. 1) and H3N2 (Fig. 2) viruses recommended for inclusion in 1996–2009 seasonal influenza vaccines. Since NI data had not previously been used to generate an NA antigenic map, we first established that end-point NI titers provided sufficient sensitivity for the analysis. This process was done by comparative analysis of end-point titers (inverse of the serum dilution that inhibits NA activity ≥50%) and the precise 50% inhibition titer (IC50), the inverse of the serum dilution that results in exactly 50% inhibition determined by nonlinear regression analysis (14) of ferret antisera generated in response to H3N2 infection. The maps generated using these datasets were very similar, with an excellent correlation of distances between antigens on the map, r2 = 0.99 (Fig. S1). End-point NI titers were therefore used in subsequent analyses. We also showed that there was good correlation between antigenic distance determined using NI data in tables and the antigenic distance determined from map location (Fig. S2) (r2 = 0.95 for N1 and r2 = 0.86 for N2 antigens), providing confidence that the antigenic maps are representative of the raw data. To confirm the location of antigens on the map, NI assays were repeated using a larger number of antisera. There was excellent correlation between the location of antigens generated by analyses of the first and second datasets (Fig. S3) (r2 = 0.98 for both N1 and N2 antigens).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Comparison of the antigenic and genetic evolution of NA and HA of influenza A (H1N1) virus. (A and B) Phylogenetic trees of the coding region of NA (A) and HA1 (B) nucleotide sequences. A/Brevig Mission/1918 was chosen as outgroup for both trees. Scale bars roughly represent 10% of nucleotide substitutions between close relatives. (C) NA and (D) HA genetic maps. The vertical and horizontal axes represent genetic distance, in this case the number of amino acid substitutions between strains; the spacing between grid lines is 3 amino acid substitutions. (E) NA and (F) HA antigenic maps based on NI and HI data, in which the viruses are shown as circles and antisera as squares. The spacing between grid lines is one unit of antigenic distance, corresponding to a twofold dilution of antisera in the NI and HI assays. The orientations of all maps were chosen to roughly match the orientation of the HI antigenic map in F, and the color-coding of viruses is consistent among all panels.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Comparison of the antigenic and genetic evolution of NA and HA of influenza A (H3N2) virus. (A and B) Phylogenetic trees of the coding region of NA (A) and HA1 (B) nucleotide sequences. A/Japan/305/1957 was chosen as outgroup for the NA tree and A/Duck/Hokkaido/33/80 for the HA1 tree. Scale bars represent approximately 10% of nucleotide substitutions between close relatives. (C and D) Genetic maps of the amino acid sequences of NA (C) and HA1 (D). The vertical and horizontal axes represent genetic distance, in this case the number of amino acid substitutions between strains; the spacing between grid lines is 4 amino acid substitutions. (E) NA and (F) HA antigenic maps of influenza A (H3N2) virus based on NI and HI data, in which the viruses are shown as circles and antisera as squares. The spacing between grid lines is one unit of antigenic distance, corresponding to a twofold dilution of antisera in the NI and HI assays. The orientations of all maps were chosen to roughly match the orientation of the H3 antigenic map in F, and the color-coding of viruses is consistent among all panels.

The raw NI data as well as the antigenic map show that the NA of human H1N1 viruses was in antigenic stasis for over a decade, as antisera to vaccine strains A/Texas/36/1991 (TX/91), A/New Caledonia/20/1999 (NC/99), and A/Solomon Islands/3/2006 (SI/06) each had similar NI titers against all three corresponding NAs, even though there had been substantial genetic diversity between them. In contrast, an abrupt antigenic change was observed for the NA of A/Brisbane/59/2007 (BR/07), the H1N1 virus recommended for use in Northern Hemisphere trivalent vaccines during the 2008/09 and 2009/10 seasons (Fig. 1 A, C, and E, and Table S2). Antisera to the older strains had at least 16-fold lower NI titers against BR/07 than against the homologous antigen. Antigenic differences in the HA for these strains were quite the opposite: HAs of TX/91, NC/99 and SI/06 were distinct from one another, but the antigenic difference between HAs of SI/06 and BR/07 was less pronounced (Fig. 1F and Table S2). The antigenic distance between the NA of BR/07 and the previous vaccine strain, SI/06, is 4.6 units (Fig. 1E), which is greater than the antigenic distance between the HAs of these viruses (2.0 units). From this observation, we speculate that the abrupt antigenic change of N1 NA may have been a factor contributing to the dominance of H1N1 in many parts of the Northern Hemisphere during the 2007/08 season (15).

The antigenic drift of NA was also not proportional to number of amino acid changes for H3N2 viruses isolated from the mid-1990s [A/Wuhan/359/95 (WU/95)] to the 2009/10 Northern hemisphere formulation [A/Uruguay/716/2007 (UY/07), an A/Brisbane/10/2007-like virus], even though phylogenetic analysis of the NAs of these viruses shows a chronologic progressive evolution at the nucleotide level (Fig. 2A). The antigenic analyses (Table S3) and maps (Fig. 2 E and F) of H3N2 vaccine viruses show that the antigenic drift of HA and NA of this subtype is also discordant. A major step in HA antigenic drift between WU/95 and A/Sydney/5/1997 (SY/97) was well-recognized previously (10, 16). However, there is almost no genetic or antigenic difference between the NAs of WU/95 and SY/97. Despite this antigenic similarity in the NAs, effectiveness of the 1997/98 inactivated vaccine was poor for healthy adults (17), suggesting that NA in the vaccine did not induce levels of antibodies with capacity to protect against laboratory-confirmed influenza-like illness.

The recommended H3N2 component for seasonal vaccine formulations from 2000/01–2003/04 was A/Moscow/10/1999 (MW/99). Because of difficulty in generating a high-growth MW/99 reassortant and based on HI data, A/Panama/2007/1999 (PM/99) was widely used for vaccine production as a MW/99-like virus. At the time, the difference in MW/99 and PM/99 NA sequences was of some concern (18), but it was not known whether this corresponded with a difference in antigenic properties. Our results show the NAs of MW/99 and PM/99 are antigenically distinct, with the NA of MW/99 positioned closer to the subsequent A/Fujian/411/2002-like vaccine strain, A/Wyoming/3/2004 (WY/03), than to PM/99 (Fig. 2E).

There tends to be an asymmetrical aspect to the reactivity of antisera with NA; antisera raised against old strains reacted weakly with more recent viruses, whereas reactivity of sera prepared against more recent viruses was often retained in NI tests against older strains. For example, antisera to BR/07 had good inhibition of TX/91 NA, and antisera to WY/03 had excellent inhibition of WU/95 NA (Table S2 and S3). An exception to this trend was the antigenic profile of PM/99's NA. This virus had weak reactivity with all sera generated against subsequent viruses.

Sera from Vaccinated Individuals Discriminate Between Viruses with Drifted NAs.

Whether NA antigenic properties determined from reactivity with ferret antisera are highly relevant predictors of human antibody titers is an important question. Ferret sera differ from human sera in the complexity of past history with influenza virus antigens, particularly because ferrets are screened to ensure seronegative status before inoculation with reference viruses, making their influenza immunity monospecific. In a previous study, we analyzed human sera collected before and after immunization with 2006–07 seasonal influenza vaccines for NI titers against the homologous NC/99 N1 and A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (WI/05) N2 antigens (14). From the small cohort in that study, we identified subsets of vaccinees with increases in serum NI titer against N1 or N2 that were robust enough to be consistently measured across repeated assays. Serum pairs that showed distinct increases in NI titer against N1 or N2 [in each case, three volunteers vaccinated with live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) and three with trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV)] were reassayed against homologous NA antigens plus NA antigens of the H3N2 or H1N1 vaccine viruses of subsequent vaccine campaigns.

There were two new H1N1 vaccine strain recommendations after the 2006–07 clinical trial: SI/06 and BR/07. Prevaccine NI titers against NC/99 and SI/06 NAs were similar in magnitude, and for most serum pairs, NI titers against NA of the vaccine strain, NC/99, and SI/06 increased to similar levels postvaccination (Fig. 3A). Both observations are consistent with the data from NI tests with use of monospecific ferret reference sera (Fig. 1C), which showed high antigenic similarity between these two NAs. In contrast, most volunteers’ prevaccine sera showed significantly less reactivity against the more recent BR/07 NA. After vaccination, NI titers against the BR/07 NA remained significantly lower than titers against the two earlier strains. The mean fold-increase in titer against BR/07 NA (1.2) was less than that against SI/06 NA (1.75) and homologous NC/99 NA (2.2), although differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.16). These data from human sera mirror the trend observed in assays with monospecific ferret sera, where BR/07 NA marked a substantial antigenic drift in the human H1N1 influenza lineage after great similarity among NAs of TX/91, NC/99, and SI/06.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Human pre- and postvaccination NI titers to homologous NA antigens and NAs of influenza virus strains in subsequent vaccine formulations. Volunteers received LAIV or TIV vaccines, as noted in graphs. Both vaccine types contained 2006/07 seasonal vaccine strains, including NC/99 (H1N1) and WI/05 (H3N2). Serum specimens were collected at day 0 (pre) and day 28 postvaccination. Pre and postvaccination NI titers of three volunteers in each vaccine group determined (A) against H1N1-derived NC/99 NA (●), SI/06 NA (■), and BR/07 NA (▲) and (B) against H3N2-derived WI/05 NA (●) and UY/07 NA (▲). The mean fold-increase in NI titer after vaccination against (C) the three N1 antigens, and (D) the two NA antigens. Statistical significance, *P < 0.05.

The 2006 recommended H3N2 vaccine strain, WI/05, was updated in 2008 to include UY/07. All of the prevaccine serum samples possessed detectable NI activity against the NA of WI/05 and UY/07 (Fig. 3B). After vaccination with LAIV or TIV, there were significantly greater increases in NI titer against WI/05 NA than against UY/07 NA (Fig. 3D) (P < 0.05). Thus, the modest antigenic distinction between two N2 NAs that was indicated by assaying ferret reference antisera was confirmed with sera of human vaccinees, showing that it is reasonable to correlate ferret serologic responses with human responses.

Single Amino Acid Change Is Largely Responsible for the Antigenic Drift of the SI/06 NA.

Studies of NA's antigenic structure with monoclonal antibodies have been used together with molecular analysis of escape variants to identify epitopes in N2 NA (19, 20), providing clues as to which sequence changes in circulating viruses signify antigenic variation. After identifying globular head-region amino acids that differ between N1 NA proteins of BR/07 and both NC/99 and SI/06, we used site-specific mutagenesis to generate constructs containing the NA of BR/07 in which specific amino acids from the corresponding sequence of SI/06 and NC/99 were introduced (Fig. 4A). All of the amino acid changes are surface residues at the opposite side to the tetramer interface (Fig. 5) and are thus potentially accessible to antibodies. Amino acid changes at positions 222, 329, and 344 (using amino acid numbering for the N1 sequence) correspond to antibody-binding determinants previously identified for N2 proteins (20, 21). Three of the variant residues (222, 249, and 344) are located on the periphery of the enzyme active site, and another (329) is located on a loop more distant from the active site. None of these changes is predicted to add or remove a glycosylation site. The reactivity of ferret anti-BR/07, anti-SI/06, and anti-NC/99 sera was tested against the mutated antigens (Fig. 4 B–D). Antisera generated against NC/99 and SI/06 could inhibit the BR/07 NA when amino acid 329 was changed from Glu to Lys. Some reactivity with antiserum to NC/99 was restored when amino acid 222 (Gln) was changed to Arg, 249 (Lys) was changed to Gly, or 287 (Ile) was changed to Thr. Of note, none of the mutants lost reactivity with antiserum against BR/07, reflecting the retention of reactivity with previous viruses noted earlier in this report and supporting the idea that other subdominant conserved epitopes are present. Most importantly, sera from human volunteers previously noted as responding to the vaccine antigen NC/99 regained full or partial reactivity with BR/07 that included the single E329K mutation (Fig. 4 E and F). Although the precise structural determinants required for antibody binding are unclear, the impact of the E329K substitution suggests that a charge interaction is important for this NA–antibody interaction. Our results demonstrate the impact of a single point mutation on NA drift and its consequence on recognition by human sera.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

One amino acid in BR/07 accounts for most of the NA drift variation from preceding H1N1 strains. (A) Alignment of amino acid differences in the NA globular head between the consensus of three antigenically similar NA proteins (TX/91, NC/99, and SI/06) and the antigenically divergent BR/07 NA. (B–D) Reactivity of H6 reassortant viruses with NA of BR/07 containing point mutations with ferret antisera raised against (B) NC/99, (C) SI/06, and (D) BR/07. Each data point represents the mean result of two independent assays, and error bars represent SD. (E and F) NI titers of human sera against viruses containing NA of NC/99, SI/06, BR/07, and BR/07 mutants.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Sites of amino acid differences between the NA globular head of SI/06 and BR/07 are shown on wire and filled space models of the monomeric (A) and tetrameric (B) NA, constructed using Modeler (32) on subtype N1 (pdb code 2HTY). Sialic acid, docked into the enzyme active site (gray), is represented as sticks with colored carbon (cyan), oxygen (red), and nitrogen (blue) atoms. Amino acids of SI/06 are highlighted: Glu214 (yellow), Arg222 (red), Gly249 (orange), Thr287 (cyan), Lys329 (magenta), Asp344 (blue), and Gly354 (pale orange).

In summary, our data provide confirmatory evidence of antigenic drift of NA that is often discordant with the antigenic drift of HA across contemporary H1N1 and H3N2 vaccine viruses. The finding that a single point mutation in NA is predominantly responsible for the antigenic drift between SI/06 and BR/07 highlights the importance of evaluating antigenic properties in addition to sequence changes when characterizing the NAs of emerging influenza viruses. In addition, our results show that for NC/99 (H1N1) and WI/05 (H3N2) components of the 2006/07 vaccine, human NA-specific antibodies reacted in a similar manner as monospecific ferret antisera, suggesting the antigenic drift identified by analysis of ferret antisera is relevant to human serologic responses. Although HA is the most abundant and important antigen for inducing neutralizing antibody responses, the contribution of NA-specific antibodies to efficacy of vaccines under development that contain significant amounts of immunogenic NA, such as virus-like particles, recombinant proteins, and high-dose vaccines (22–24), should not be overlooked. Previous studies have pointed out the importance of NA-based immunity in curbing the severity or spread of emerging strains with novel HAs. Epidemiologic analyses (25, 26) support the concept that NA antibodies contributed to protection against the 1968 pandemic H3N2 virus that possessed an NA antigenically similar to that of the previously circulating H2N2 lineage (27, 28). In addition, antibodies directed to conserved regions of NA may contribute a significant level of protection against disease: the presence of such heterologous immunity has been demonstrated in H3N2 (29) and H5N1 (30) challenge studies in mice. Studies to identify the NI titer that correlates with protection in man, the vaccine dose needed to elicit a protective response, and the breadth of this protection in man, are certainly warranted to facilitate the development of NA-containing influenza vaccines.

Materials and Methods

Viruses.

The sources of viruses and plasmids are provided in SI Materials and Methods. NA genes were cloned from H1N1 and H3N2 vaccine seed strains listed in Table S1 and reassortant viruses generated by eight-plasmid reverse genetics for the NI assays, as described previously (14). Single amino acid mutations were introduced to the plasmid-encoded BR/07 NA gene using the QuikChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies). Virus stocks were amplified in 10-d embryonated chicken eggs for use in NI and HI assays. Viruses grown in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells obtained from the National Influenza Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, were also used in HI testing.

Genetic Analyses.

Phylogenetic trees and genetic maps based on the coding region of NA or HA1 were constructed to analyze the genetic evolution of human H1N1 and H3N2 viruses, as described in SI Materials and Methods.

Sera and Serological Assays.

The sources of ferret and human antisera used in NI and HI analyses are provided in SI Materials and Methods. Titration of serum NI antibodies was performed by analyzing NA activity of the HA-mismatched reassortant viruses in a 96-well plate format of the conventional thiobarbituric acid assay (14), as described in SI Materials and Methods. A conventional assay was used to determine HI titers (31), as described in SI Materials and Methods.

Antigenic Cartography.

The antigenic properties of human influenza A (H1N1) and human influenza A (H3N2) viruses were characterized using NI and HI data and antigenic cartography methods as described previously for HI data of human influenza A (H3N2) viruses (12) and in SI Materials and Methods.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

We thank Zhiping Ye and Vladimir Lugovtsev for viruses; Robert Webster for plasmids; Olga Zoueva and Arash Hassantoufighi for technical support in preparing reassortant viruses; Theo Bestebroer and Stefan van der Vliet for excellent technical assistance with hemagglutination inhibition assays; and Timothy Straight for provision of human sera. This study used the CamGrid distributed computing resource and was supported by Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Pandemic Influenza funds (to M.C.E.); a VICI grant of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (to R.A.M.F.); a National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award (DP1-OD000490-01 to D.J.S.), European Union FP7 programs EMPERIE (223498 to D.J.S.) and ANTIGONE (278976 to D.J.S.), a Human Frontier Science Program grant (P0050/2008 to D.J.S.), and a University Research Fellowship from the Royal Society (to C.A.R.).

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1113801108/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Webster RG, Laver WG, Air GM, Schild GC. Molecular mechanisms of variation in influenza viruses. Nature. 1982;296:115–121. doi: 10.1038/296115a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Laver WG, Air GM, Webster RG, Markoff LJ. Amino acid sequence changes in antigenic variants of type A influenza virus N2 neuraminidase. Virology. 1982;122:450–460. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(82)90244-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Luther P, Bergmann KC, Oxford JS. An investigation of antigenic drift of neuraminidases of influenza A (H1N1) viruses. J Hyg (Lond) 1984;92:223–229. doi: 10.1017/s002217240006424x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kilbourne ED, Johansson BE, Grajower B. Independent and disparate evolution in nature of influenza A virus hemagglutinin and neuraminidase glycoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:786–790. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.2.786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schulman JL, Khakpour M, Kilbourne ED. Protective effects of specific immunity to viral neuraminidase on influenza virus infection of mice. J Virol. 1968;2:778–786. doi: 10.1128/jvi.2.8.778-786.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Webster RG, Reay PA, Laver WG. Protection against lethal influenza with neuraminidase. Virology. 1988;164:230–237. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90640-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clements ML, Betts RF, Tierney EL, Murphy BR. Serum and nasal wash antibodies associated with resistance to experimental challenge with influenza A wild-type virus. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;24:157–160. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.1.157-160.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murphy BR, Kasel JA, Chanock RM. Association of serum anti-neuraminidase antibody with resistance to influenza in man. N Engl J Med. 1972;286:1329–1332. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197206222862502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hensley SE, et al. Influenza A virus hemagglutinin antibody escape promotes neuraminidase antigenic variation and drug resistance. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e15190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Russell CA, et al. Influenza vaccine strain selection and recent studies on the global migration of seasonal influenza viruses. Vaccine. 2008;26(Suppl 4):D31–D34. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Barr IG, et al. Writing Committee of the World Health Organization Consultation on Northern Hemisphere Influenza Vaccine Composition for 2009-2010 Epidemiological, antigenic and genetic characteristics of seasonal influenza A(H1N1), A(H3N2) and B influenza viruses: Basis for the WHO recommendation on the composition of influenza vaccines for use in the 2009–2010 Northern Hemisphere season. Vaccine. 2010;28:1156–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Smith DJ, et al. Mapping the antigenic and genetic evolution of influenza virus. Science. 2004;305:371–376. doi: 10.1126/science.1097211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kilbourne ED, Laver WG, Schulman JL, Webster RG. Antiviral activity of antiserum specific for an influenza virus neuraminidase. J Virol. 1968;2:281–288. doi: 10.1128/jvi.2.4.281-288.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sandbulte MR, Gao J, Straight TM, Eichelberger MC. A miniaturized assay for influenza neuraminidase-inhibiting antibodies utilizing reverse genetics-derived antigens. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2009;3:233–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2009.00094.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Anonymous; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Influenza activity—United States and worldwide, 2007-08 season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:692–697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.de Jong JC, Beyer WE, Palache AM, Rimmelzwaan GF, Osterhaus AD. Mismatch between the 1997/1998 influenza vaccine and the major epidemic A(H3N2) virus strain as the cause of an inadequate vaccine-induced antibody response to this strain in the elderly. J Med Virol. 2000;61:94–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bridges CB, et al. Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;284:1655–1663. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.13.1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu X, Shaw M, Smith C, Cox N, Klimov A. Multiple lineages co-circulation and genetic reassortment of the neuraminidase and hemagglutinin genes within influenza viruses of the same type/subtype. Int Congr Ser. 2001;1219:383–397. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lentz MR, Air GM, Laver WG, Webster RG. Sequence of the neuraminidase gene of influenza virus A/Tokyo/3/67 and previously uncharacterized monoclonal variants. Virology. 1984;135:257–265. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(84)90135-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gulati U, et al. Antibody epitopes on the neuraminidase of a recent H3N2 influenza virus (A/Memphis/31/98) J Virol. 2002;76:12274–12280. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.23.12274-12280.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Air GM, Laver WG, Webster RG, Els MC, Luo M. Antibody recognition of the influenza virus neuraminidase. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1989;54:247–255. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1989.054.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pushko P, et al. Recombinant H1N1 virus-like particle vaccine elicits protective immunity in ferrets against the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus. Vaccine. 2010;28:4771–4776. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brett IC, Johansson BE. Immunization against influenza A virus: Comparison of conventional inactivated, live-attenuated and recombinant baculovirus produced purified hemagglutinin and neuraminidase vaccines in a murine model system. Virology. 2005;339:273–280. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cate TR, et al. A high dosage influenza vaccine induced significantly more neuraminidase antibody than standard vaccine among elderly subjects. Vaccine. 2010;28:2076–2079. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Monto AS, Kendal AP. Effect of neuraminidase antibody on Hong Kong influenza. Lancet. 1973;1:623–625. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)92196-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Viboud C, Grais RF, Lafont BA, Miller MA, Simonsen L. Multinational Influenza Seasonal Mortality Study Group Multinational impact of the 1968 Hong Kong influenza pandemic: evidence for a smoldering pandemic. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:233–248. doi: 10.1086/431150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schulman JL, Kilbourne ED. Independent variation in nature of hemagglutinin and neuraminidase antigens of influenza virus: distinctiveness of hemagglutinin antigen of Hong Kong-68 virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1969;63:326–333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.2.326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schild GC, Newman RW. Immunological relationships between the neuraminidases of human and animal influenza viruses. Bull World Health Organ. 1969;41:437–445. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schulman JL. The role of antineuraminidase antibody in immunity to influenza virus infection. Bull World Health Organ. 1969;41:647–650. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sandbulte MR, et al. Cross-reactive neuraminidase antibodies afford partial protection against H5N1 in mice and are present in unexposed humans. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e59. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Palmer DF, Coleman MT, Dowdle WD, Schild GO. Advanced Laboratory Techniques for Influenza Diagnosis. Immunology series no. 6. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1975. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol. 1993;234:779–815. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES