Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Hum Genet. 2011 Jan 31;75(3):418–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2010.00639.x

Table 1.

Population structure settings in simulation I.

Population structure setting* Group Population 1 Population 2 Population 3 Population 4
S1 (a, b) Case 500a 500b
Control 500(1 − a) 500(1 − b)
S2 (p1, p0) Case 500p1 500(1 − p1)
Control 500p0 500(1 − p0)
S3 (p11, p12, p01, p02) Case 500p11 500p12 500(1 − p11 − p12)
Control 500p01 500p02 500(1 − p01 − p02)
S4 (p11, p12, p13, p01, p02, p03) Case 500p11 500p12 500p13 500(1 − p11 − p12 − p13)
Control 500p01 500p02 500p03 500(1 − p01 − p02 − p03)

Population structure S1 has two subpopulations with each having 500 samples. Population structure S2–S4 each has 500 cases and 500 controls. In S1, the parameters a and b take values in Table 2. S2 contains two subpopulations, where p1 and p0 denote the proportions of cases and controls from subpopulation 1, respectively. We consider two levels of population stratification: the moderate ancestral difference is defined as (p1, p0) = (0.4, 0.6), and the extreme ancestral difference is defined as (p1, p0) = (0.5, 0). S3 contains three subpopulations. Moderate and extreme ancestral differences are defined as (p11, p12, p01, p02) = (0.45, 0.35, 0.35, 0.20) and (0.33, 0.67, 0.0, 0.33), respectively. S4 contains four subpopulations. Parameters (p11, p12, p13, p01, p02, p03) take values (0.35, 0.3, 0.2, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3) and (0.25, 0.25, 0.5, 0.0, 0.5, 0.25), which correspond to moderate and extreme ancestral differences between cases and controls, respectively.