Abstract
We assessed hematologic recovery, body weight, and behavior after serial blood collection in 10- to 14-wk-old C57BL/6 mice. Male and female mice (5 to 11 mice for pilot groups, 23 to 35 mice for full study groups) had either 15%, 20%, or 25% of their estimated total blood volume (TBV) collected once weekly for 6 wk. Except for those of the 25% TBV male pilot group, the weights of all mice recovered or increased from one collection to the next. The behavior of all mice, with the exception of the 25% TBV male pilot group, appeared normal throughout the study. Erythrogram value changes from baseline were analyzed at each weekly blood collection. Recovery was defined as the return of mean hemoglobin values to within 2 SD of mean baseline values. According to this definition, mice in the 15% TBV male group and 15%, 20%, and 25% TBV female groups recovered hematologically. To support the statistical definition of recovery, we compared our data with human anemia categories to assess the clinical relevance of the mouse hemoglobin values. On the basis of these data, we conclude that as much as 25% TBV can be collected once weekly from female mice for 6 wk and as much as 15% TBV can be collected once weekly from male mice for 6 wk without producing weight loss, behavioral changes, or clinically significant anemia.
Abbreviation: TBV, total blood volume
Blood collection is often required for animal experimental protocols, whether for pharmacokinetic or toxicokinetic analysis, determining hematologic and chemistry values, collecting blood components, or any number of other analyses. The volume and frequency of blood collected from an animal needs to be considered, because these collection variables can adversely affect the welfare of an animal and create experimental variability by causing immunosuppression, a decrease in cardiac output, a decrease in blood pressure, anemia, hemorrhagic shock, or mortality.19,21
Existing published guidelines on blood sample collection volumes and frequency are general in nature and not species-specific. One source recommends that 7.5% of the total blood volume (TBV) can be removed with a 1-wk recovery period, 10% TBV can be removed with a 2-wk recovery period, and 15% TBV can be removed with a 4-wk recovery period.5 This same source states that taking a single sample greater than 15% TBV is not recommended. Another recommendation is that 10% TBV can be removed with a 3- to 4-wk recovery period, whereas 1% TBV can be removed every 24 h.21 A third published recommendation states that 15% TBV should be the limit for a single sample with a 30-d recovery time.19
Experimental protocols that require blood collection are a potential concern when working with small laboratory animals, such as mice. The sample volumes necessary for desired analyses may be greater than those recommended for collection in published general guidelines; moreover, some studies may require serial analyses.5,19,21 Because of a lack of mouse-specific information in the literature regarding blood collection volumes and frequency, veterinarians and IACUC must rely on these general guidelines when evaluating protocols that involve blood collection procedures in mice. To assist IACUC and the scientific community, we conducted the current study to evaluate hematologic recovery in mice after large-volume serial blood collection.
In various species, blood heat output, which reflects RBC metabolism, shows an allometric relationship.29,30 This relationship suggests that animals with a smaller body size have a relatively fast blood regeneration rate. Therefore, we hypothesized that the relatively fast regeneration rate of mice would allow their erythrogram to recover more rapidly after blood collection than current guidelines recommend.
Materials and Methods
Animals and housing.
All mice used during this study were maintained in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals12 at the University of Illinois at Chicago (Chicago, IL), an AAALAC-accredited institution. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the University of Illinois at Chicago Animal Care Committee. Male and female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Portage, MI). Mice were maintained in facilities in which sentinel mice tested negative for the following agents: Sendai virus, pneumonia virus of mice, mouse hepatitis virus, minute virus of mice, mouse parvovirus, Theiler murine encephalomyelitis virus, reovirus, rotavirus, mouse adenovirus, polyoma virus, K virus, mouse cytomegalovirus, mouse thymic virus, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, hantavirus, ectromelia virus, lactate dehydrogenase elevating virus, mouse norovirus, Mycoplasma pulmonis, and Helicobacter spp. In addition, sentinel mice were free of helminths and external parasites. Mice were housed 3 to 5 per cage by sex in static autoclaved (sterilized) polysulfone microisolation cages (Ancare, Bellmore, NY) with irradiated diet (7912, Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI), autoclaved municipal water in bottles, and autoclaved corncob bedding (7090, Harlan Teklad) with a 14:10-h light:dark cycle. Mice were allowed to acclimate for at least 7 d prior to the study. At the start of experiments, mice ranged from 10 to 14 wk of age and weighed an average of 25.9 g and 20.2 g for male and female mice, respectively.
Experimental design.
All mice in this study had a percentage of their TBV collected once weekly (every 7 d) for 6 wk. Initially, a group of 33 male and 35 female mice had 15% of their TBV collected weekly. The data obtained from this group indicated that mice could recover each week from this level of weekly blood collection. A pilot study then was conducted with 4 male and 5 female mice at 20% TBV and 11 male and 6 female mice at 25% TBV. The data from this pilot study indicated that female mice in both the 20% and 25% TBV collection groups and male mice in the 20% TBV collection group could recover each week from this level of weekly blood collection. Findings showed that male mice did not adequately recover from a weekly 25% TBV collection. In light of these data, 19 additional male mice were bled at the 20% TBV level, and 18 additional female mice were bled at the 25% TBV level.
Sedation and blood collection.
Mice were weighed immediately prior to each blood collection. The amount of blood collected at each time point was determined given the assumption that TBV was 6% of body weight.2,15,17 Mice were sedated with fentanyl citrate (0.8 mg/kg IP; Hospira, Lake Forest, IL) 1 to 5 min prior to blood collection. The volume of fentanyl injected in the 15% TBV group was approximately 1.8 times the amount of blood that was collected. Fentanyl in the 20% and 25% TBV groups was diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL) so that the final volume administered was equal to approximately 1.8 times the volume of blood that was removed. Blood was collected from the retroorbital sinus in aliquots of 70 µL by using 70-µL nonheparinized microhematocrit capillary tubes (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). The last tube in each collection was filled in a proportional manner based on the length of tube needed to meet each animal's respective blood collection requirement. We estimated samples collected were within 6% of the calculated blood volume.
Blood collection tubes.
Blood collection tubes were prepared inhouse, because some of the volumes collected were less than that recommended for commercially available anticoagulant tubes. A solution of 18 mg K2EDTA (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) per 1 mL of distilled water was prepared. From this 18 mg/mL solution, 14-µL aliquots were pipetted into 0.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes (Fisher Scientific), which then served as the blood collection tubes. Prior testing demonstrated that this concentration of EDTA did not affect hematocrit values or cause RBC crenation.
Sample processing.
For some of the female mice in the 15% TBV group, the volume of blood collected was less than the 200 µL required by the hematology analyzer used for this study, necessitating dilution of the samples prior to analysis. All samples from all mice were diluted prior to analysis even if more than 200 µL blood was collected. During blood collection, 140 µL of the total volume collected from each mouse was placed into a blood collection tube (described previously) for a final ratio of 1.8 mg K2EDTA per 1 mL blood.13 The remainder of the collected blood was discarded. To dilute the samples, 110 µL of anticoagulated blood was transferred to another 0.5-mL microcentrifuge tube containing 110 µL diluent (Sheath Rinse for Advia 120, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY) for a final sample volume of 220 µL (1:2 dilution). The hematology analyzer was programmed to account for the dilution factor.
Hematologic analyses.
Analyses were performed on an automated hematology analyzer (Advia 120, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) using mouse-specific algorithms and parameters (Technicon H•1E MultiSpecies Software, version 3.0, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics). Parameters determined included WBC count and differential, RBC count, hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, mean platelet volume, and reticulocyte count and percentage.
Animal monitoring.
Mice in all groups were observed daily for lethargy or other signs of illness. Mice in the 15% TBV groups were weighed weekly immediately prior to each blood collection. Mice in the 20% and 25% TBV groups were weighed immediately prior to and at 1, 2, and 5 d after each blood collection.
Endpoint criteria.
Mice with a hematocrit below 40% for 2 consecutive weeks were euthanized, and a complete necropsy was performed.
Statistical analyses.
A generalized estimating equation model was done on all parameters for male and female mice of all groups, comparing mean values from collections 2 through 6 with mean baseline (collection 1) values by using SAS 9.2 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Results were considered statistically significant at P ≤ 0.01. The 95% confidence intervals were determined for mean hemoglobin values from collections 2 through 6 for the 15% TBV male and female, 20% TBV male, and 25% TBV female groups and compared with mean baseline values.
Baseline hemoglobin and anemia.
Baseline hemoglobin values (mean ± 2 SD) for each sex were calculated by using data from the first blood collection time point from all mice in all groups (n = 67 male and 64 female mice). Anemia was defined as a hemoglobin concentration more than 2 SD below the mean of baseline hemoglobin values.
Results
Morbidity and mortality.
Mice in all groups remained healthy throughout the course of the study. Overall, animals exhibited normal behavior, and no signs of illness or lethargy were noted. Immediately after blood collection, no ill effects from a behavioral perspective were seen in any of the mice in the 15% and 20% TBV male groups or the 15% and 25% TBV female groups. In contrast, mice in the 25% TBV male pilot group took longer to stand and ambulate after blood collection, when compared with mice in other groups.
Necropsy.
Only one mouse reached endpoint criteria and was euthanized. A complete necropsy was performed on this mouse from the 25% TBV male pilot group. No gross abnormalities were seen, and there were no histopathologic changes that would account for the low hematocrit values. It was concluded that the low values were a direct result of the blood collection procedures.
15% and 20% TBV male groups and 15% and 25% TBV female groups.
The mean body weights of male and female mice in the 15% TBV groups, male mice in the 20% TBV group, and female mice in the 25% TBV group increased over the course of the study (Figure 1). Hematocrit, RBC count, hemoglobin concentration, mean corpuscular volume, and reticulocyte values (mean ± 2 SD) from each blood collection are presented in Table 1. Hemoglobin values (mean ± 1 SD) from each blood collection are presented graphically in Figure 2. The 95% confidence intervals for hemoglobin concentration (g/dL) were 14.0 to 14.5 for 15% TBV male mice, 14.6 to 14.9 for 15% TBV female mice, 13.1 to 13.7 for 20% TBV male mice, and 14.3 to 14.7 for 25% TBV female mice.
Figure 1.
Body weight (g; mean ± 1 SD) in (A) male and (B) female mice over time. Arrows indicate days of blood collections. Mice in the 15% TBV groups were weighed weekly immediately prior to each blood collection. Mice in the 20% and 25% TBV groups were weighed immediately prior to and at 1, 2, and 5 d after each blood collection. Green lines indicate approximate average weight gain by age for C57BL/6 mice as reported by the vendor (Charles River).
Table 1.
Select hematologic values (mean ± 2 SD) for male and female mice
| Male |
Female |
||||
| Collection no. | 15% TBV | 20%TBV | 15% TBV | 25% TBV | |
| Hematocrit (%) | 1 | 46.5 ± 4.2 | 49.3 ± 3.8 | 45.4 ± 2.8 | 48.3 ± 2.6 |
| 2 | 45.7 ± 6.6 | 44.7 ± 4.4 | 45.3 ± 3.4 | 48.1 ± 3.8 | |
| 3 | 46.1 ± 4.0 | 44.8 ± 6.6 | 46.7 ± 3.4 | 48.2 ± 3.0 | |
| 4 | 47.3 ± 5.2 | 48.2 ± 4.6 | 49.3 ± 5.0 | 50.0 ± 2.8 | |
| 5 | 47.4 ± 3.4 | 48.0 ± 4.6 | 47.7 ± 3.0 | 50.0 ± 3.8 | |
| 6 | 46.2 ± 4.4 | 47.6 ± 4.8 | 48.5 ± 4.8 | 49.4 ± 3.4 | |
| RBC (× 106/µL) | |||||
| 1 | 10.0 ± 0.8 | 10.5 ± 0.6 | 9.8 ± 0.6 | 10.1 ± 0.6 | |
| 2 | 9.8 ± 1.2 | 9.4 ± 0.8 | 9.6 ± 0.6 | 9.9 ± 0.8 | |
| 3 | 9.7 ± 0.8 | 9.2 ± 1.0 | 9.8 ± 0.6 | 9.7 ± 0.4 | |
| 4 | 9.9 ± 1.0 | 9.4 ± 1.0 | 10.2 ± 0.8 | 9.7 ± 0.4 | |
| 5 | 9.9 ± 0.8 | 9.3 ± 0.6 | 9.8 ± 0.4 | 9.8 ± 0.6 | |
| 6 | 9.7 ± 0.8 | 9.4 ± 0.8 | 10.0 ± 0.8 | 9.8 ± 0.6 | |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | |||||
| 1 | 14.7 ± 1.4 | 15.2 ± 1.2 | 14.8 ± 0.8 | 15.1 ± 0.8 | |
| 2 | 14.2 ± 1.8 | 13.3 ± 1.4 | 14.3 ± 1.0 | 14.7 ± 1.2 | |
| 3 | 14.1 ± 1.2 | 13.3 ± 2.2 | 14.6 ± 1.0 | 14.6 ± 0.8 | |
| 4 | 14.4 ± 1.6 | 13.4 ± 1.4 | 15.1 ± 1.4 | 14.5 ± 1.0 | |
| 5 | 14.5 ± 1.2 | 13.1 ± 1.2 | 14.6 ± 0.8 | 14.3 ± 0.8 | |
| 6 | 14.0 ± 1.6 | 13.5 ± 1.2 | 15.0 ± 1.2 | 14.3 ± 0.8 | |
| Mean corpuscular volume (fL) | |||||
| 1 | 46.3 ± 1.8 | 47.0 ± 1.0 | 46.1 ± 0.8 | 47.7 ± 1.0 | |
| 2 | 46.8 ± 2.0 | 47.5 ± 2.2 | 47.1 ± 1.4 | 48.8 ± 1.4 | |
| 3 | 47.8 ± 1.6 | 48.6 ± 2.6 | 47.7 ± 1.2 | 49.4 ± 1.6 | |
| 4 | 47.8 ± 1.6 | 51.5 ± 3.8 | 48.4 ± 1.6 | 51.4 ± 2.8 | |
| 5 | 47.7 ± 1.4 | 51.8 ± 1.8 | 48.5 ± 1.6 | 51.0 ± 2.4 | |
| 6 | 47.7 ± 1.6 | 50.7 ± 2.6 | 48.3 ± 2.2 | 50.4 ± 2.8 | |
| Reticulocytes (× 109) | |||||
| 1 | 376 ± 232 | 352 ± 104 | 308 ± 102 | 329 ± 84 | |
| 2 | 564 ± 202 | 654 ± 262 | 486 ± 196 | 586 ± 206 | |
| 3 | 499 ± 140 | 677 ± 246 | 490 ± 184 | 602 ± 176 | |
| 4 | 513 ± 154 | 629 ± 218 | 430 ± 150 | 508 ± 206 | |
| 5 | 485 ± 90 | 546 ± 158 | 436 ± 110 | 512 ± 220 | |
| 6 | 486 ± 108 | 588 ± 194 | 417 ± 186 | 525 ± 216 | |
Italic type indicates values are significantly (P ≤ 0.01) lower than baseline (collection 1) values. Bold type indicates values are significantly (P ≤ 0.01) higher than baseline values.
Figure 2.
Hemoglobin concentration (g/dL; mean ± 1 SD) over time.
20% female pilot group.
The results demonstrated that female mice (n = 5) can recover hematologically from weekly collection of 20% TBV (data not shown).
25% male pilot group.
Over the course of the study, the mean body weight of these mice increased from 25.0 g at baseline to 26.4 g at collection 6. However, 4 of 11 animals had a decreased weight at 1 wk after a blood collection for at least one collection time point during the study. For hematocrit, RBC count, and hemoglobin concentration, the mean values from collections 2, 3, 4, and 6 were statistically lower than the mean baseline values. No hematologic data was available from this group for collection 5, due to technical issues with the hematology analyzer. In one mouse, hematocrit values fell below 40% for 2 consecutive weeks, meeting our endpoint criteria. In light of these observations, we determined that male mice did not recover hematologically from weekly blood collection of 25% TBV. As this was a pilot study with only 11 animals, data is not shown.
Baseline hemoglobin and anemia.
Baseline hemoglobin values (mean ± 2 SD) in male and female mice were 15.0 ± 1.4 and 14.9 ± 1.0 g/dL, respectively, and the normal hemoglobin concentration ranges were 13.6 to 16.4 and 13.9 to 15.9 g/dL for male and female mice, respectively. Hemoglobin values less than 13.6 g/dL were considered anemic for male mice, whereas values less than 13.9 g/dL were considered anemic for female mice.
Anemia categorization.
An anemia severity scale based on hemoglobin was developed for our mice using an anemia categorization chart established by the World Health Organization.8 The mouse scale was created by calculating the percentage change from normal for the various anemic categories and applying this information to our mouse values (Table 2).
Table 2.
Categories of anemia based on hemoglobin concentration (g/ dL) for humans and our mouse population
| Mouse |
|||
| Anemia category | Humana | Male | Female |
| Normal | >13 (men) >12 (women) | ≥13.6 | ≥13.9 |
| Very mild | 11.0–11.9 | 12.5–13.5 | 12.8–13.8 |
| Mild | 9.5–10.9 | 10.7–12.4 | 11.0–12.7 |
| Moderate | 8.0–9.4 | 9.1–10.6 | 9.3–10.9 |
| Severe | 6.5–7.9 | 7.3–9.0 | 7.5–9.2 |
From references 7, 8, 14, and 33.
The percentages of hemoglobin concentration values from blood collections 2 through 6 that fell into the various anemia categories are presented in Table 3.
Table 3.
Percentages of hemoglobin concentration values from blood collections 2 through 6 in anemia categories
| 15% TBV |
20% TBV | 25% TBV | ||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| Normal | 84 | 95 | 48 | 85 |
| Very mild | 15 | 5 | 39 | 15 |
| Mild | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
| Moderate | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Severe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other hematologic parameters.
No trends or patterns were noted for any TBV group in regard to WBC count or differential, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, and mean platelet volume (data not shown).
Discussion
These data support the hypothesis that mouse erythrograms recover more rapidly after blood collection than general guidelines suggest, allowing a greater percentage of their TBV to be collected serially. These data also support the notion that blood regeneration may be correlated to body mass along an allometric scale, with mice having a faster blood regeneration rate than that of larger species, including rats, dogs, and horses.18,23,25,28 As much as 15% TBV can be collected once weekly from male mice for 6 wk, whereas as much as 25% TBV can be collected once weekly from female mice for 6 wk; we evaluated 10- to 14-wk-old C57BL/6 mice.
Because most of the blood value changes were associated with the erythrogram, we needed to determine what would be considered an indicator of anemia in our mice in order to define recovery. Anemia generally is defined as a RBC count, hemoglobin concentration, or hematocrit value lower than 2 SD below the mean of a normal population.1,16,20,34 We chose hemoglobin as the most important value among these 3 parameters, because it is the most direct and sensitive measure for detecting anemia.4,16,20,24,27 Therefore, for the purposes of this study, we defined anemia as a hemoglobin concentration more than 2 SD below the mean of baseline hemoglobin values.
Accordingly, given this definition of anemia, our definition of recovery in our mice was a return of mean hemoglobin values to the lower limit of normal or to within 2 SD of mean baseline values. On the basis of this definition of recovery, at least 50% of the population would have a hemoglobin value that was within normal limits. In a study that investigated the effects of acute blood collection in rats, recovery was defined as a return of RBC, hematocrit, and hemoglobin values to within 10% of mean baseline values.23 The authors did not provide a scientific reason for choosing this definition, nor did they take into account the variability of the data.23 Our definition of recovery is more conservative than that used in the cited study,23 and our data for the 15% TBV male and 15% and 25% TBV female groups fall within the earlier definition of recovery.23 Other blood collection studies reported in the literature involving rats, dogs, and horses failed to define recovery.18,25,28
On the basis of our definition of recovery, we considered a value below 13.6 g/dL as anemic for male mice and below 13.9 g/dL as anemic for female mice. We defined recovery as a hemoglobin value of at least 13.6 g/dL for male mice and at least 13.9 g/dL for female mice.
The most clinically relevant statistics are the 95% confidence intervals for hemoglobin concentration values from blood collections 2 through 6. These ranges can be compared with baseline hemoglobin values to determine whether the mice recovered (hemoglobin concentration of at least 13.6 g/dL in male mice and at least 13.9 g/dL in female mice). Given these results, we had 95% confidence that mean hemoglobin concentration values in the 15% TBV male and 15% and 25% TBV female groups met our definition of recovery. The 20% TBV male group did not meet our definition of recovery.
Another way recovery was evaluated was by comparing the data with the human definition of anemia. According to the World Health Organization, the definition of anemia in humans is a hemoglobin concentration below 13 g/dL for men and below 12 g/dL for nonpregnant women.7,14,33 The World Health Organization further divides anemia into categories by severity (Table 2).8 Using this categorization chart, we calculated the percentage change from normal for the various anemic categories and applied this information to our mouse values, developing anemia scales for our male and female mice (Table 2). We placed the hemoglobin concentration values for all mice from blood collections 2 through 6 into these categories according to mouse sex (Table 3). In the 15% TBV male group, although 16% of the values would be considered anemic by these standards, 15% were very mildly anemic and 1% mildly anemic, with 84% considered within normal limits. For the 15% TBV female group, 5% of the values would be considered very mildly anemic, with the remaining 95% considered in the normal range. For the 25% TBV female group, 15% of the values would be considered very mildly anemic and 85% normal. In humans, anemia categorized as mild or very mild is not typically associated with clinical symptoms and usually is not treated.3,7,8,10,11
In the 20% TBV male group, however, only 48% of the hemoglobin concentration values would be considered within normal limits according to World Health Organization categories, whereas 52% would be considered anemic. Specifically, 39% of the values fell into the very mildly anemic category, 11% in the mildly anemic category, and 2% in the moderately anemic category. Considering the higher percentage of mild-to-moderate anemic values along with the fact that this group did not recover according to our statistical definition, we do not recommend weekly removal of 20% TBV from male C57BL/6 mice. These comparisons provide clinical relevance based on the human definition of anemia and support our statistical definition of recovery.
Recovery also was assessed by evaluating body weight and behavior. Subjectively, mice in the 25% TBV male pilot group took longer to stand and ambulate after blood collection when compared with mice in other groups. All mice, with the exception of the 25% TBV male pilot group, had either recovered their weight or gained weight from one blood collection to the next, and mean body weights increased over the course of the study.
Hemograms did not show any evidence of iron deficiency. Reticulocyte counts and mean corpuscular volumes from blood collections 2 through 6 were increased from baseline for all groups (Table 1). These data indicate that erythrocyte regeneration was continuing to occur and that iron deficiency was not an issue for any of the groups over the course of the 6-wk study.6,14,22,32,34
The results of our study show a sex-associated difference in the ability of the mice to recover from blood collection, with female mice having a more robust recovery from serial blood collections than male mice. This result is in contrast to a previous study, 23 in which male Sprague–Dawley rats had a more robust recovery after acute blood collection procedures than did female rats. We were unable to find published reports providing an explanation for sex-associated differences in rates of blood regeneration; further investigation into this phenomenon is needed.
Because blood regeneration rates may vary among mouse strains, the recommendations of our current study are specific for C57BL/6 mice. Published reports of the exact percentage of body weight that is blood volume in a mouse vary (range of approximately 5% to 9%).2,5,9,15,17 When following our recommendations, TBV should be calculated as 6% of body weight. The fluid volume injected as part of sedation procedures may have had the beneficial effect of countering any signs of hypovolemia.5,26,31 If our blood collection recommendations are followed, we suggest giving mice an intraperitoneal injection of fluids at the time of collection, at least equal to the amount of blood collected. Finally, we opted for retroorbital blood collection in our study, because we are skilled at the technique and could best control the specific volume of blood collected. Our recommendations are based on the phlebotomist being skilled and proficient in whatever method of blood collection is used.
In summary, results of our current study support our hypothesis that mouse erythrograms recover more rapidly after blood collection than existing general guidelines suggest, allowing a greater percentage of TBV to be collected serially. As much as 15% TBV can be collected weekly from male C57BL/6 mice for 6 wk and as much as 25% TBV weekly from female C57BL/6 mice for 6 wk without causing ill effects or compromising animal welfare. These recommendations likely will assist IACUC and veterinarians when reviewing protocols involving blood collections in mice.
Acknowledgment
We thank Weihua Gao for her assistance with the statistical analyses.
References
- 1.Arid WC. 2003. Anemia, p 232–240. : Furie B, Cassileth P, Atkins M, Meyer R. Clinical hematology and oncology: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bernstein SE. 1966. Physiological characteristics, p 337–350. : Green EL. Biology of the laboratory mouse. New York (NY): Dover Publications [Google Scholar]
- 3.Carmel R, Denson TA, Mussell B. 1979. Anemia, textbook versus practice. JAMA 242:2295–2297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1998. Recommendations to prevent and control iron deficiency in the United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 47 RR-3:1–36 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Diehl KH, Hull R, Morton D, Pfister R, Rabemampianina Y, Smith D, Vidal JM, van de Vorstenbosch C. 2001. A good-practice guide to the administration of substances and removal of blood, including routes and volumes. J Appl Toxicol 21:15–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Giger U. 2005. Regenerative anemias caused by blood loss or hemolysis, p 1886–1907. : Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC. Textbook of veterinary internal medicine, vol 2. St Louis (MO): Elsevier [Google Scholar]
- 7.Glader B. 2004. Anemia: general considerations, p 947–978 : Forester J, Lukens JN, Rodgers GM, Paraskeras F, Glader B. Wintrobe's clinical hematology. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams and Wilkins [Google Scholar]
- 8.Groopman JE, Itri LM. 1999. Chemotherapy-induced anemia in adults: incidence and treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1616–1634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gunji H, Little RA, Hiraiwa K. 2002. Interleukin-6 deficiency increases blood volume without altering body composition in young mice. Cytokine 20:30–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hillman RS, Ault KA. 1995. Hematology in clinical practice. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill, Inc [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hoffbrand AV, Pettit JE. 1993. Essential hematology. Cambridge (MA): Blackwell Scientific [Google Scholar]
- 12.Institute for Laboratory Animal Research 1996. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.International Council for Standardization in Haematology Expert Panel on Cytometry 1993. Recommendations of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology for ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid anticoagulation of blood for blood cell counting and sizing. Am J Clin Pathol 100:371–372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Izaks GJ, Westendorp RGJ, Knook DL. 1999. The definition of anemia in older persons. JAMA 281:1714–1717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jacoby RO, Fox JG, Davisson M. 2002. Biology and diseases of mice, p 35–120 : Fox JG, Anderson LC, Loew FM, Quimby FW. Laboratory animal medicine 2nd edition San Diego (CA): Academic Press [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jain NC. 1993. Essentials of veterinary hematology. Philadelphia (PA): Lea and Febiger [Google Scholar]
- 17.Joslin JO. 2009. Blood collection techniques in exotic small mammals. J Exot Pet Med 18:117–139 [Google Scholar]
- 18.Malikides N, Mollison PJ, Reid SWJ, Murray M. 2000. Haematological responses of repeated large volume blood collection in the horse. Res Vet Sci 68:275–278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McGuill MW, Rowan AN. 1989. Biological effects of blood loss: implications for sampling volumes and techniques. ILAR News 31:5–20 [Google Scholar]
- 20.Moreno Chulilla JA, Romero Colás MS, Gutiérrez Martín M. 2009. Classification of anemia for gastroenterologists. World J Gastroenterol 15:4627–4637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Morton DB, Abbot D, Barclay R, Close BS, Ewbank R, Gask D, Heath M, Mattic S, Poole T, Seamer J, Southee J, Thompson A, Trussell B, West C, Jennings M. 1993. Removal of blood from laboratory mammals and birds. Lab Anim 27:1–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Munker R, Hiller E, Paquette R. 2000. Modern hematology: biology and clinical management. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nahas K, Provost JP, Baneux P, Rabemampianina Y. 2000. Effects of acute blood renoval via the sublingual vein on haematological and clincal parameters in Sprague–Dawley rats. Lab Anim 34:362–371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Oliver S, Andrews GA, Smith JE, Kaneko JJ. 2010. Erythrocyte structure and function, p 123–130 : Weiss DJ, Wardrop KJ. Schalm's veterinary hematology, 6th ed Ames (IA): Blackwell Publishing [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ooms TG, Way HL, Bley JA. 2004. Clinical and hematological effects of serial phlebotomy performed on laboratory beagles. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 43:38–42 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Otto CM. 2005. Shock, p 455–457 : Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC. Textbook of veterinary internal medicine, vol 1 St Louis (MO): Elsevier [Google Scholar]
- 27.Quinto L, Aponte JJ, Menéndez C, Sacarlal J, Aide P, Espasa M, Mandomando I, Guinovart C, Macete E, Hirt R, Urassa H, Navia MM, Thompson R, Alonso PL. 2006. Relationship between haemoglobin and haematocrit in the definition of anaemia. Trop Med Int Health 11:1295–1302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Scipioni RL, Diters RW, Myers WR, Hart SM. 1997. Clinical and clinicopathologic assessment of serial phlebotomy in the Sprague–Dawley rat. Lab Anim Sci 47:293–299 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Singer D. 2004. Metabolic adaptation to hypoxia: cost and benefit of being small. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 141:215–228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Singer D, Schunck O, Bach F, Kuhn H-J. 1993. Body size allometry of mammalian blood heat output as assessed by microcalorimetry. Thermochim Acta 229:133–145 [Google Scholar]
- 31.Spaniol JR, Knight AR, Zebley JL, Anderson D, Pierce JD. 2007. Fluid resuscitation therapy for hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Nurs 14:152–160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tvedten H. 2010. Laboratory and clinical diagnosis of anemia, p 152–161 : Weiss DJ, Wardrop KJ. Schalm's veterinary hematology, 6th ed Ames (IA): Blackwell Publishing [Google Scholar]
- 33.World Health Organization 1968. Nutritional anaemias. Report of a WHO scientific group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 405: 5–37 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Weiss DJ. 2010. Iron and copper deficiencies and disorders of iron metabolism, p 167–171 : Weiss DJ, Wardrop KJ. Schalm's veterinary hematology, 6th ed Ames (IA): Blackwell Publishing [Google Scholar]


