Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2011 May 26;58(1):41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.050

Table 2.

Results (value± sd (t-value, p-value)) of the modeling of the intersubject variability in fraction anisotropy (FA) and gray matter thickness (GM thickness ) using the base, quadratic age and sex model (eq. 1). Bolded values are significant at p≤1E-4.

Measurement Average βage±sd·10−3 (t;
p)
βage2±sd·10−3 (t;p) βsex± sd (t;p) βage,sex±sd·10−3
(t;p)
Λbase (p)
Whole Brain FA 0.52±0.31 2.0±0.3 (7.2, 1E-8) −0.03±0.00 (9.3, 1E-11) −0.5±0.4(0.14, 0.9) −0.00±0.00 (0.31,0.8) 2264.4 (1E-16)
Early Maturing WM FA 0.51±0.28 1.5±0.3 (9.0; 1E-9) 0.02±0.00 (10.9, 1E-11) −0.00±0.00(0, 1.0) 0.00±0.00 (1.2, 0.22) 2361.1 (1E-16)
Late Maturing WM FA 0.57±0.38 2.4±0.2 (10.0; 1E-9) −0.04±0.00 (13.6, 1E-16) 0.3±3.6 (0, 1.0) −0.00±0.00 (0.31,0.8) 2253 (1E-16)
Whole Brain GM
thickness
2.21±0.17 1.1±1.3 (0.9; 0.39) −.09±0.001 (5.5;1E-8) 0.09±0.02 (4.2; 1E-5) −2.5±0.6 (4.9;E-6) 431.0 (1E-16)