Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Immunol Rev. 2010 Jul;236:41–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00918.x

Intertwined pathways of programmed cell death in immunity

Stephen M Hedrick 1, Irene L Ch’en 1, Bryce N Alves 1
PMCID: PMC3137483  NIHMSID: NIHMS308012  PMID: 20636807

Abstract

Programmed cell death (PCD) occurs widely in species from every kingdom of life. It has been shown to be an integral aspect of development in multicellular organisms, and it is an essential component of the immune response to infectious agents. An analysis of the phylogenetic origin of PCD now shows that it evolved independently several times, and it is fundamental to basic cellular physiology. Undoubtedly, PCD pervades all life at every scale of analysis. These considerations provide a backdrop for understanding the complexity of intertwined, but independent, cell death programs that operate within the immune system. In particular, the contributions of apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis in the resolution of an immune response are considered.

Keywords: T cells, apoptosis, autophagy, cell activation, signaling proteins

Convergent evolution of PCD in prokaryotes and eukaryotes

The selective advantage of programmed cell death (PCD) in multicellular organisms is easy to understand. There are many examples where disposing of cells would be, on balance, beneficial. An example is parasitism by infectious agents where cellular suicide is a ubiquitous form of immunity that denies intracellular parasites the opportunity to replicate (1). But PCD transcends immunity. It is clearly a part of the developmental program of development for all metazoans examined, being particularly prevalent in degenerating tissues (think, the resolution of webbed digits) (2) but present during all phases of generative development as well (3). Less obviously, PCD is highly developed in both single-cell prokaryotes and eukaryotes, illustrating the selective power of altruism at least in clonal organisms. Such selective power has given rise to multiple pathways of PCD in metazoans, and these pathways have been found to be highly intertwined—so much so that there can be difficulty in sorting out the proximal cause of death in certain examples of PCD. To emphasize the universality of PCD and better understand its origins, this review starts with a brief survey of PCD phylogeny, and ends with a detailed analysis of PCD in T cells.

Prokaryotes

Although the selective advantage for PCD is not obvious for unicellular organisms, a cursory analysis of the current state of the field shows that both prokaryotic (4) and eukaryotic (5) unicellular organisms exhibit robust PCD. Thus far there does not appear to be an example of PCD in Archea, but that may be for lack of discovery. What can we learn from distantly related examples of PCD and how would this affect our understanding of the complexity of PCD in mammals?

In one example, Bacillus subtilis uses environmental cues or quorum sensing to act as a multicellular organism, differentiating into distinct subpopulations. Under conditions of nutrient limitation, a subpopulation delays sporulation and the SpoOA operon is activated (6). The SpoOA-active cells produce an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette (ABC) and an ABC transporter that pumps sporulation killing factor (Skf) from the cell. This example of toxin-anti-toxin resistance simultaneously confers resistance to Skf and targets SpoOA-inactive cells for lysis. In addition, SpoOA-active cells produce a signaling peptide (SdpC) that may repress sigma factor in SpoOA-inactive cells, rendering cells more sensitive to the effects of Skf. SpoOA-active cells utilize the released nutrients from dead cells, survive, and delay sporulation. As it is clearly beneficial to delay sporulation until absolutely necessary, this represents a selective advantage for a genetically identical population. The population of bacteria acts as a multicellular organism, digesting parts of itself to the selective advantage of its descendents. Although the mechanics of this system of PCD have no connection to eukaryotic cell death, it illustrates one of the concepts driving the selection of PCD, that is, selective resource utilization under conditions of stress. Clearly, this can convey an important advantage even in the prokaryotic kingdom. As an aside, cheaters, insensitive to the effects of Skf, would have an initial advantage as a minor proportion of a wildtype population but a disadvantage as they become too prevalent. We note that this is but one form of cell death in B. subtilis (7).

Bacteria have many forms of immunity to phage and plasmids, including one that has been termed ‘adaptive immunity’ (8, 9). Among their arsenal of defense mechanisms, bacteria use PCD as a form of immunity. The mazEF system is another toxin-anti-toxin ‘addiction module’ encoded within the chromosome of E. coli and other bacteria. MazF is a stable toxin that cleaves mRNA at a specific site, whereas MazE is a labile anti-MazF. Thus, prevention of MazF-induced death requires continuous production of MazE. This system was shown to act as an altruistic form of immunity to prevent the spread of bacteriophage P1 (10). Addition of phage P1 to wildtype cultures did not prevent the bacteria from growing to stationary phase, whereas ΔmazEF cultures grew for a period of time but ultimately collapsed due to massive phage lysis. Other examples of PCD as a form of immunity in prokaryotes have been found, and we surmise that they abound in the prokaryotic world (11). Resource limitations and infectious agents are but two selective pressures sufficient to give rise to distinct pathways of PCD in prokayotes.

Unicellular eukaryotes

One of the most phylogenetically distant (from us) eukaryotes is Dictyostellium discoideum, a soil ameba that multiplies as a unicellular organism in nutrient abundance. In nutrient-deficient conditions, it undergoes cellular differentiation and morphogenesis to form a multicellular slug-like structure with viable spores and a stalk of vacuolated cells (5). These stalk cells apparently undergo a form of PCD with characteristics of apoptotic and non-apoptotic death (5). A genome analysis has shown that Dictyostellium may have two genes that are orthologous to the death pathway genes of multicellular eukaryotes. One encodes a paracaspase that possesses protease activity (12) and orthologous to Malt1 in mammals. Malt1 is involved in the signal cascade leading to nuclear factor κB (NFκB) activation. Dictyostellium also has an ortholog of Atg1, and as described for other organisms (13), studies showed that Dictyostellium Atg1 is required for macroautophagy (14). Nonetheless, neither Atg1 nor the single paracaspase Malt1 is needed for PCD in the stalk of the starved slug (15, 16).

Dictyostellium cells subjected to starvation and differentiation-inducing factor (DIF) undergo mitochondrial uncoupling, and this is sufficient to induce events associated with a cell death described as necrotic: perinuclear clustering of mitochondria, disintegrity of the plasma membrane, and lysosomal rupture (17, 18). Unfortunately, no other molecular details have been described, and other than the paracaspase and Atg1 kinase mentioned above, no other death pathway orthologs have thus far been found in the Dictyostellium genome.

Viruses able to infect Dictyostellium have never been described, and to date, there is no evidence for PCD in ameba responding to the threat of infection by various pathogenic bacteria. Interestingly, there does appear to be an immune response in starved Dictyostellium (19). In the migrating slug, a small subset of cells develops into sentinel cells and circulates within the slug, engulfing bacteria and sequestering toxins. A TIR-domain containing protein, TirA, was found to be necessary for at least some of these functions. Whether sentinel cells also maintain and utilize PCD as a means of sequestering pathogenic bacteria is unknown. Regardless, this observation suggests that an ancient foraging mechanism gave rise to phagocytosis as a form of immunity. In addition, the very same bacterial virulence factors that inhibit phagocytosis in Dictyostellium inhibit phagocytosis by mouse macrophages (20), which suggests that bacterial phagocytosis by amebae may have provided the selective pressure for bacteria to evolve anti-phagocytic virulence factors. The world of bacterial pathogenesis might have been enabled by the step-wise selection of bacteria evermore resistant to amoebic foraging.

These studies on amebae suggest the possibility that autophagy is a fundamental process of eukaryotes predating metazoan evolution, as all eukaryotes examined to date possess highly conserved means of autophagic reutilization of cytoplasmic constituents (21, 22). However, at least in extant Dictylostellium, it is not the mechanism of PCD. Rather the most distant mechanism of PCD appears related to programmed necrosis with the caveat that until we have the mechanistic components of necrotic cell death in examples of pre-metazoan protists, we do not know that this morphologically defined process is evolutionarily related to programmed necrosis found in mammals (18).

Metazoans

PCD in metazoans is most commonly carried out via apoptosis; yet, we can deduce that apoptotic cell death as it exists today was not present prior to multicellular diversification. At least it has not been maintained in the protists examined thus far. The basic components of apoptosis such as Apaf-1 and Caspase-3-related caspases are not found in ameba, although they are found in Cnidaria (e. g. hydra), one of the most distantly related metazoan phyla (23). There is a strong conservation of Bak and Bax, caspase activation, and DNA fragmentation in sea anemone (phylum, Cnidaria) and sponges (phylum, Porifera), and so it would seem that the apoptotic machinery was present at the root of metazoan diversification. However, as reviewed recently, these orthologs often regulate apoptotic cell death in surprisingly diverse ways, e.g. CED-9 serves a different mechanistic role in C. elegans compared with Bcl-2 in mammals (24), albeit both are pro-survival. In addition to apoptosis, PCD may take the form of autophagy or necrosis. An analysis of these forms of death reveals that they are highly interrelated.

Diverse mechanisms of cell death in the immune system

In present day mammals, there are thought to be three types of PCD: Type I apoptosis, Type II autophagy, and Type III necrosis. The history and basis for these classifications have been comprehensively reviewed (22, 25–27). Although PCD has been extensively recorded and studied since the dawn of cell theory in the 19th century (28), we still do not have a clear understanding of the way in which each of these three forms of death contribute to many physiological processes. The next three sections constitute an attempt to understand how these types of cell death are intertwined and whether they are truly distinct.

Type I-apoptosis

The phenomenon of ‘chromatolysis’ was described in many tissues, and it included characteristics typical of Type I apoptosis, a relatively recent term applied to describe a particular morphological description of death (29, 30). It appears to be a dominant pathway of cell death, found naturally in virtually all pre- and post-developmental tissues and constitutes a default state that must be actively inhibited in most thriving cell types. Simple removal of cells from their cognate cellular interactions is sufficient to induce an apoptotic cascade leading to cell death (31–33). Apoptosis has now been clearly and extensively characterized in terms of the molecular events that occur and the way in which these molecular events result in cell death (26, 34–37). Most relevant here, apoptotic PCD constitutes an important aspect of host immunity, and this is illustrated by the many viruses and bacteria that have evolved apoptotic regulatory factors (38–44). In fact, pathogenic virulence factors provide a high-resolution reflection of pro- and anti-apoptotic pathways.

Although described in detail and reviewed many times by those with primacy in the field, the simple outline of intrinsic apoptosis involves mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) by Bax and Bak (45, 46). Prosurvival effectors such as Bcl-2 or Bcl-XL serve to inhibit Bax and Bak, whereas proapoptotic factors, such as Bim and Puma, inhibit Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL. The exact details of these signaling events are still under active study, with experiments revealing a survival activity for Bcl-XL and Bcl-2 independent of their binding to Bax (47–49). The formation of MOMP allows the irreversible release of death effectors such as cytochrome c, apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF), Smac (Diablo), Omi HtrA2, and endonuclease G (50). Each has a different function, but cytochrome c causes the oligomerization of Apaf-1 and the activation of Caspase-9. From there, a proteolytic cascade of effector caspases (Caspases-3, -6, -7) ensues, resulting in the orchestrated breakdown of the cell by way of DNA fragmentation and the membrane expression of signals for engulfment (51). A hallmark of apoptotic death is that it usually occurs without exciting an inflammatory response (52).

Alternatively, there exists an extrinsic pathway of apoptosis that involves death receptors (DRs), which in human beings include Fas [tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 6 (TNFRSF6)], TNFRI (TNFRSF1A), DR3 (TNFRSF25), TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1 (TRAILR1) or DR4 (TNFRSF10A), TRAILR2 or DR5 (TNFRSF10B), and DR6 (TNFRSF21) (53, 54). In addition, there are three decoy TRAIL-binding receptors: TRAILR3 or DcR1 (TNFRSF10C), TRAILR4 or DcR2 (TNFRSF10D), and osteoprotegerin (55). Ligation of Fas, DR4, or DR5 results in the direct binding of Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD) and the formation of the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) that includes the initiator caspase, Caspase-8, and Caspase-10 (Caspase-10 is not found in mice) (56). Alternatively, the ligation of TNFR1 and DR3 bind TRADD and RIPK1 and activate NFκB and mitogen-associated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, although depending on context, TRADD and RIPK1 can also bind FADD and form a DISC (53). Caspase-8 activation, in turn, activates effector Caspases-3, -6, and -7, thus achieving a similar end result as that of the intrinsic pathway. A central enigma in understanding the extrinsic pathway is that, in activated T and B cells, it appears to also behave as a survival mechanism, and this is the focus of later sections.

Type 2-autophagic degeneration

The second morphological category of cell death has been described as type 2 macroautophagy or simply autophagy, and in fact if this is a death pathway at all, its regulation is seemingly convoluted. It is characterized by the presence of abundant double-membraned vacuoles. Starvation, the loss of growth factors, protein aggregation, and other cellular stresses increase the normal basal level of autophagy. Autophagy in mammalian cells is further characterized by a punctate vesicular distribution of an ortholog of yeast autophagy protein, Atg8 (microtubule-associated protein-1 light chain-3, LC3) (57). Mechanistically, double membrane-bound autophagosomes deliver cytoplasmic constituents destined for degradation to the late endosomes and lysosomes (58). The process is directly related to autophagy in yeast, where cellular constituents are broken down and reutilized under conditions of resource deprivation. Its function is to allow starved cells to survive until resources are again plentiful (21). A similar pathway was shown to be operative in mammalian cells by examining the withdrawal of IL-3 from IL-3-addicted immortalized cells. In Bax−/−Bak−/− cells, removal of IL-3 resulted in an extended autophagic process ending with the expiration of size-diminished cells containing little cytoplasm. By contrast, without Atg5 or Atg7 in such cells, removal of IL-3 resulted in rapid, presumably non-apoptotic cell death (57). Clearly, in the absence of apoptosis, autophagy was able to rescue or at least delay cell death, whereas in the absence of both pathways, yet another mechanism of death was engaged.

The components of autophagy have been identified by the selection for at least 30 autophagy-related (Atg) mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (59, 60). Many of these identified mutant genes have orthologs in eukaryotic species (58, 61). Autophagy can be initiated by two ubiquitin-conjugating systems based on the conjugation of the ubiquitin-like products Atg8 and Atg12 (62–64). Atg12 is activated by an E1-like enzyme, Atg7, transferred to an E2-like enzyme, Atg10, and coupled to Atg5 (65, 66). Atg8 (mammalian ortholog is LC3) is also activated by Atg7; it is transferred to the E2-like enzyme, Atg3, and conjugated to phosphatidyl-ethanolamine (becoming LC3II in mammalian cells) (63). Thus, Atg7 is essential for both ubiquitin-like conjugation systems. Its function was deciphered from experiments on Atg7-deficient mice, where no autophagy was reported, and mice died 1 day postpartum (67). Among the many phenotypes exhibited by these mice, adults with a liver-specific Atg7 deletion revealed a profound deficiency in the fasting-induced degradation of cytosolic proteins and organelles (67). Atg1 and Atg5 are also thought to be required for both autophagic pathways (68).

More recently, an alternative Atg5/Atg7-independent form of macroautophagy has been discovered in mouse embryonic fibroblasts subjected to the stress of etoposide. Similar to the results described above, autophagic vacuoles were detected in the brains, livers, and hearts of fetal Atg5−/− mice. It also operates in the autophagic elimination of organelles in developing erythrocytes, indicating that this alternative form of autophagy has a physiological role (69). As a targeted deletion of Atg7 is embryonic lethal, the alternative form of autophagy is not redundant, but one idea is that it is key to the type 2 autophagic death pathway.

Autophagy defined by morphology can be found in association with many examples of naturally occurring cell death throughout the eukaryotic kingdom (70, 71). As described above, it is also found in cells that have lost the ability to undergo apoptosis because of a genetic deficiency in Bax and Bak (57, 72). All such cells ultimately die without detectable DNA fragmentation, perhaps as a consequence of collapsed cell energetics. However, this is often only a correlation of morphologic appearance and progression to death, as the relationship between autophagy and cell death is still not well understood. Although there are examples in which autophagy appears to be directly causative of cell death, these examples are still rare (22, 73–77). In many instances in which autophagy is associated with cell death, viability is not rescued by prevention of autophagic pathways (78, 79). In other investigations, evidence was largely gathered by the use of an inhibitor of macroautophagy, 3-MA, and yet this drug has many substrates (80). Even knockdown of Beclin-1, a necessary component of autophagy, can have other effects, most importantly on apoptosis (81).

Several molecular connections between autophagy and apoptosis have been described, possibly indicating a contingency of one to the other. In one study, Atg5 was shown to interact with FADD (82), and the investigators proposed that Atg5 mediates both vacuole formation and death, with the death being dependent upon FADD-induced caspase activation (75). No connection was made to the downstream effector of FADD, Caspase-8, and the implication was that this constituted evidence of a novel FADD-dependent pathway to apoptosis and autophagy (83).

Bcl-2, known to be a potent inhibitor of Bak and Bax, also functions to regulate autophagy through a direct interaction with Beclin-1 (an Atg6 mammalian ortholog that associates with phosphoinositide 3-kinase and required for autophagosome formation) (81, 84, 85). The direct interaction was demonstrated in both yeast and mammalian cells. An analogous form of regulation was also found in the plant hypersensitive response (HR), a form of PCD induced in response to virus infection. In BECLIN-1-deficient Arabidopsis, HR spread to uninfected cells, whereas in wildtype plants, HR was limited to those cells infected by tobacco mosaic virus (86).

A third interaction between the apoptosis pathway and autophagy was shown to occur between Flice-like inhibitor protein (Flip) and Atg3. Cellular (or viral) Flips were shown to suppress autophagy by interfering with the reaction of Atg3 and LC3. Thus, Flip inhibits Caspase-8, preventing the extrinsic form of apoptosis, and also inhibits autophagy. These connections between apoptosis and autophagy make an analysis of the proximal cause of cell death difficult (22, 74, 75).

In T cells, the lack of autophagy results in increased cell death, especially under conditions of activation. As thymocytes mature and migrate to the secondary lymphoid organs, there normally occurs a loss of mitochondria. In Atg7-deficient T cells, this loss of mitochondria does not take place, and the autophagy-deficient T cells have increased reactive oxygen species as well as an imbalance in pro- and anti-apoptotic protein expression (87). The result is a decrease in T-cell survival. Activation of Atg7-deficient T cells results in substantially reduced survival compared with wildtype cells without a marked alteration in either the rate of cell cycle progression or the infection-induced kinetics of T-cell expansion and contraction (I. L. Ch’en and S. M. Hedrick, unpublished data). In addition, autophagy constitutes an important facet of immunity against bacteria and viruses (88, 89). It is vital to the elimination of group A Streptococcus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Shigella flexneri (90–92). It is also activated and possibly protective in response to Sindbis virus (84) and Herpes viruses (93), and it is an essential part of antigen presentation in dendritic cells (94, 95).

Type 3 non-lysosomal cytoplasmic degradation, necrosis

In a highly cited review from 1990 (25), Clarke redefined Type 1 apoptosis and Type 2 autophagic degeneration, but he found no literature describing cell death precisely equivalent to the type 3 death originally described by Schweichel and Merker (96). Rather, he listed a Type 3b ‘cytoplasmic’ cell death that still differed from Types 1 and 2. In this form of cell death, mainly characterized in dying neurons, organelles such as the rough endoplasmic reticulum, the nuclear envelope, and the Golgi become dilated, and the cytoplasm becomes vacuolated (97–99). Defining characteristics of Type 3b cytoplasmic degeneration included a lack of autophagic vacuoles and nuclear condensation, the presence of dilated cytoplasmic organelles, and a loss of plasma membrane integrity (25, 100). None of these characteristics provides a definitive biochemical trait for necrosis, such as the activation of caspases or DNA fragmentation provides for apoptosis. Loss of membrane integrity is characteristic of all dying cells, with kinetics being the only feature distinguishing apoptotic from necrotic cells.

This form of cell death has since been explicitly reported in many examples of developmental PCD (101–106), and perhaps the most medically relevant example arises from ischemia-reperfusion events that result in the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) (107). Components of the mPTP were thought to include the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC), the adenine nucleotide translocator (ANT), the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, cyclophilin D, and other molecules (108); however, only cyclophilin D has been verified by genetic ablation experiments (109). Mice deficient in the gene encoding cyclophilin D (Ppid) do not exhibit necrosis induced by ischemia-reperfusion injury (110–112). At the same time, cells from these mice remained sensitive to various mediators of apoptosis. One might be tempted to conclude that the requirement for cyclophilin D provides a unique characteristic of programmed necrotic cell death.

In addition to the loss of plasma membrane integrity and the formation of the mPTP, necrotic cell death has been characterized by the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), ATP depletion, dysregulation of Ca2+homeostasis, activation of proteases such as calpains and cathepsins, and lysosomal rupture (100). With all this information, what are the constituent components of necrotic cell death?

One of the most tractable examples of necrotic cell death comes from studies on cell lines that lack components of the DISC. L-929, Jurkat T lymphoma, and mouse embryonic fibroblasts undergo apoptosis when treated with ligands of the death receptors: Fas, TNFRI, or Trail-R. However, in the presence of the small molecule pan-caspase inhibitor zVAD-fmk or poxvirus-derived caspase inhibitor CrmA, Fas-ligand, TNF, or Trail-treated cells undergo a delayed form of death that morphologically resembles necrosis (113–116). Further work showed that a loss of FADD or Caspase-8 sensitized cells to necrotic death, and a necessary downstream effector of this death was Ripk1 (previously known as RIP1) (116). In a study to find small molecule inhibitors of necrotic death in the absence of apoptosis, one molecule designated Necrostatin-1 was found to inhibit TNF-mediated necrosis in the presence of zVAD-fmk. The investigators termed this form of programmed necrotic death necroptosis (78) and found the target of Necrostatin to be the kinase activity of Ripk1 (117). Indeed, Necrostatin was also found to inhibit the death associated with ischemia reperfusion, and so there would appear to be functional connection between Cyclophilin D-dependent necrosis and Necrostatin-sensitive necroptosis. Although autophagy was evident in cells undergoing TNF-mediated necroptosis, it could not be inhibited by knockdown inhibition of any of several autophagic components (78). A conclusion was that inhibition of the DISC under conditions of a death signal provided by TNF led to Ripk1-dependent necroptosis.

Apoptosis, autophagy, and necroptosis in the regulation of T-cell homeostasis

Natural T-cell expansion and contraction

Although PCD appears to be important in every organism and in most, if not all, physiological organ systems, it is most evident within the immune system. T cells exhibit dramatic expansion and contraction in response to many infectious agents, and in fact, T cells are almost certainly the most dynamic cell population in metazoans. By some estimates, the 50–200 precursor T cells specific for a particular viral epitope may expand 10 000–50 000-fold over the course of 7–8 days. In studies with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), up to 90% of the total T-cell population present at the peak of an immune response are virus-specific (118, 119). Equally dramatically, after the peak of expansion, the population rapidly dies off with similar kinetics, leaving only a rear-guard of memory cells. Control of this dynamic contraction constitutes the major topic scrutinized in this issue of Immunological Reviews. A note of caution here, this rapid die-off and resolution is true for T-cell responses to viruses and bacteria that are neatly cleared by the immune system. Those viruses that utilize persistence as a mechanism of transmission, e.g., those that rely on venereal transmission, do not elicit the same type of tidy expansion and contraction of T cells. Rather, persistent viruses induce a T-cell response that is poorly resolved, resulting in exhausted and anergic effector T cells (120, 121).

With so much cell death occurring during the resolution of an immune response, what signals induce cell death, and which mechanisms of death are in evidence? During the contraction phase of the response, dying cells show hallmarks of apoptosis (122, 123). Most prominently, the die-off was diminished in the absence of the pro-apoptotic BH3-only Bcl-2 family members, Bim (124–126) or Puma (127, 128), or the ultimate MOMP mediators, Bax and Bak (129). However, the overexpression of Bcl-2 or Bcl-XL did not appear to affect the contraction of virus-specific CD8+ T cells (130). Moreover, the contraction phase of a virus-specific immune response was shown to be insensitive to caspase inhibitors (131). One hypothesis is that T cells in the contracting population lack sufficient growth factors and undergo apoptosis by default (132, 133), and yet in competition experiments, this does not appear to be the case (134). The mechanism and regulation underlying the contraction of CD8+ T cells is yet unresolved.

The participation of the extrinsic apoptosis pathway is also still being debated. The original contention was that lymphocyte contraction was Fas-dependent based upon the discovery of activation-induced cell death in T cells (135–138). However, Fas or TNFRI-deficient CD8+ T cells or even double-deficient T cells exhibited normal contraction following expansion induced by an acute virus infection (130, 139, 140). The deletion of both TNFRI (death domain-containing) and TNFRII (non-death domain-containing) appeared to diminish or delay the contraction of LCMV-specific T cells, although the double mutant did not maintain a high number of effector T cells (141). This observation indicates that TNF does play a role in the contraction phase of a T-cell response, but it is not the only mechanism and it may not be the primary mechanism of cell death.

Another facet of the extrinsic death pathway is that Fas- or FasL-deficient mice harbor an excess of T cells with the unusual phenotype of B220+CD4−CD8−, and yet, a T-cell-specific deletion of Fas shows no such phenotype. The lymphoproliferative disease of Fas-mutant mice required Fas deletion in both lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues, and the origin of this is still not entirely understood (142). Mice with a T-cell-specific Fas deletion exhibited severe lymphopenia and the accumulation of FasL on activated T cells.

Further investigation of Fas revealed that it is important for the elimination of antigen-presenting cells and chronically stimulated T cells, such as those activated by persistent viruses or autoimmune disease (143–145). These investigations were extended in experiments examining the dynamics of an immune response in Fas-deficient (lpr) mice with the additional deletion of Bim. In one analysis, the findings were consistent with those cited above: Bim, but not Fas, was found to be important in the clearance of T cells following an acute Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) infection, whereas the combination of a Fas mutation and Bim deletion was needed to see an abnormal increase in the number of antigen-specific cells in the spleen following a chronic murine γ-herpesvirus (MHV) infection (146). A second study on Fas- or Bim-deficient mice examined the much-studied acute virus response to LCMV-Armstrong and showed little change in the contraction of T cells in the spleen, but in lpr, Bim double deficient mice, T cells exhibited no contraction in the lymph nodes (147). One problem with all these studies is that they do not show whether the requirement for Fas and Bim is T-cell intrinsic or related to the other complicated aspects of immune regulation involving non-lymphoid or non-hematopoietic cells. Clarification might come from either adoptive transfer experiments or T-cell-specific deletions of Fas and Bim.

The extrinsic death pathway regulates survival: a wealth of experiments, a paucity of understanding

A difficulty in studying the role of the extrinsic death pathway in the immune system is that there are several DRs that can coordinate overlapping pathways, ultimately initiating an apoptotic cascade through the activation of Caspase-8. If there exists DR redundancy, perhaps mutants in common downstream effectors would exhibit a stronger phenotype. As such, several groups produced mice with a defect in FADD or Caspase-8 to study the dynamics of the ensuing immune response. Enigmatically, the observed phenotype was opposite to that expected. In mice with a defect in either FADD or Caspase-8, the expansion of T cells in vitro or in vivo was substantially diminished (148–156). Although early reports purported to provide evidence for a defect in cell cycle progression (157–159), our experiments showed that this was not the case. FADD- or Caspase-8 deficient T cells, optimally stimulated, progressed through exactly the same number of divisions as wildtype T cells. In addition, Caspase-8 deficient T cells took up BrdU both in vitro and in vivo at exactly the same rate as wildtype cells (154, 160). Rather, the reduced expansion of T cells was entirely due to an increased rate of cell death as measured by uptake of 7AAD or staining by Annexin V. In activated T cells, the DISC thus acts to promote cell survival!

The origin of this death sensitivity has also been controversial. One prominent study on both human and mouse T cells deficient for Caspase-8 purported to show that there was a deficiency in NFκB activation (161). In addition, deletion of Caspase-8 in B cells was likewise reported to result in an NFκB activation defect (155). This result could explain an increased rate of death, as NFκB regulates a number of genes important for cell survival. However, other comprehensive studies on T and B cells harboring a FADD or Caspase-8 deficiency clearly showed that no defect exists in the antigen or mitogen stimulation of NFκB activation, measuring five different parameters of NFκB activation including a gene array analysis of 107 known NFκB target genes (153, 156, 160, 162). In fact, the cause of cell death was found to be uncharacteristic of apoptosis and unrelated to the death mediated by genetic knockout of NFκB components. Caspase-8 or FADD-deficient T cells optimally stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 showed little DNA fragmentation or caspase activation. By contrast, proliferating NFκB-defective T cells divided at a reduced rate with dying cells found actively fragmenting their DNA (160).

If not apoptosis, then what was the cause of cell death in Caspase-8 deficient stimulated T cells? One group proposed that the T cells lacking Caspase-8 die by autophagy (159), and this conclusion was based on the formation of autophagic vesicles and the presence of LC3-II in TCR-stimulated T cells with a FADD-dominant interfering transgene. In addition, these investigators found evidence for a complex consisting of Caspase-8, FADD, Atg5, 12, 16, and Ripk1. This is in line with a report on the nature of death found in cell lines treated with inhibitors of Caspase-8. Here, Caspase-8 inhibition was sufficient to cause autophagy that appeared to depend on Beclin-1, Atg7, and Ripk1 (163).

An alternative is that Caspase-8-deficient T cells die via necroptosis. Indeed, Caspase-8-deficient T cells stimulated to divide in culture were completely rescued by the addition of Necrostatin-1 or its active derivatives (159, 160). As the target of Necrostatin was found to be the kinase activity of Ripk1 (117), further work showed that a knockdown of Ripk1 also rescued Caspase-8-deficient T-cell expansion in response to antigen stimulation in vivo (160). Thus, in a manner not yet understood, FADD and Caspase-8, presumably in a complex, maintain Ripk1 in an inactive state. Although work has shown Caspase-8 able to cleave Ripk1 directly (164), T cells lacking Caspase-8 did not accumulate increased amounts of Ripk1. In fact, the amount of Ripk1 in Caspase-8 deficient T cells was reduced, although the specific activity was markedly increased (160). As Ripk1 may be also involved in the regulation of autophagy, the possibility exists that Caspase-8 deficient T cells increase autophagic activity and die as a result of autophagic or necroptotic mechanisms. The proximal cause of death has not been determined.

Apoptosis or necrosis: inhibition of Caspase-8 as a PAMP

These results are consistent with the notion that death by apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis are highly interwoven, and perhaps the circuitry acts as a means of detecting viral infection. In an instance of infection, T cells would die rather than proliferate and potentially propagate the infection. The only time T cells would naturally lack Caspase-8 activity is if they were virally infected, as many viruses harbor anti-Caspase-8 virulence factors (44). In this sense, Caspase-8 inhibition is a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP). For example, cytomegalovirus (CMV) encodes a specific inhibitor of Caspase-8 known as vICA (165). This inhibition is key to virus replication, and yet if there is an alternate pathway, how does the virus prevent premature death? The answer may be that CMV also encodes the M45 product that suppresses Ripk1. Thus, as would be expected for Red Queen co-evolution (166), for each futile attempt by the host to counteract viral virulence factors, there is a selection-driven evolutionary response by the virus. Although we do not know the order in which vICA and M45 were evolved, a reasonable guess is that it was viral-host co-evolution that drove the link between the inhibition of Caspase-8 and Ripk1.

The role of Ripk1 in survival, apoptosis, or necroptosis

Ripk1 appears to hold a strong nodal position in the signaling network governing the fate of many cells including T and B lymphocytes. It can coordinate apoptosis through the assembly of a DISC, it can activate NFκB through the recruitment of a signaling complex that induces IKK, it forms a complex with components of the autophagy process, and it is required for necroptosis. The specifics of the latter signaling pathway are less well established. We know there are three Ripk-related molecules encoded separately, Ripk1, Ripk2, and Ripk3, and they are similar only within the amino-terminal kinase domain (167). Ripk2 is involved in Nod2-mediated NFκB regulation, both positive and negative (168, 169), but it does not appear to participate in the DISC pathway or the pathway regulating necroptosis. Ripk1 can enucleate two or more signaling complexes (170), at least one of which includes Ripk3 (171–173). These complexes propagate distinct signals and understanding these pathways is the key to understand the circuitry of PCD in many cells, including T cells.

DRs and, most particularly, TNFRI can form two different signaling complexes. In response to TNF ligation, TNFRI can recruit TRADD, Traf2, and Ripk1 along with cIAP1 and cIAP2 to form what is referred to as Complex I (170, 174). In a Traf2 and cIAP1,2-dependent manner, Ripk1 is ubiquitinated, resulting in the recruitment of a complex consisting of Tak1 and Tak1-binding proteins as well as the IKKα/β/γ heteromeric combination. The result is phosphorylation of IκB followed by the activation of NFκB dimers (175, 176). Although not as well understood, there can also occur the activation of Jnk and p38 (177–179). This is opposed by the deubiquitinating enzyme, cylindromatosis (Cyld) or A20 (180–182). A20 can remove K63 ubiquitin from Ripk1 and replace it with K48 ubiqutin. With the reduction of K63 ubiquitination, Ripk1 may instead promote cell death (183, 184). Either TRADD or Ripk1 can recruit FADD and Caspase-8 to form the DISC-like complex II (174). This DISC may be held in check by cFlip but can be disrupted by K48 cFlip ubiquitination and degradation initiated by the E3 ligase, Itch (185). Above is but a brief summary of these interactions, and the reader may refer to more comprehensive reviews (167, 174, 184).

Most recently, three studies (171–173) further characterized necrotic cell death downstream of TNFRI signaling, showing that it requires the interaction of Ripk1 and Ripk3. Using the same type of model system in which TNF-stimulated cells were blocked for caspase activation, an siRNA knockdown screen found an essential role for Ripk3. The interaction of Ripk1 and Ripk3 was found to occur via a Rip homotypic interaction motif (RHIM), and this was required to mediate necroptosis. In one of the studies, this protein complex was found to interact with glycogen phosphorylase (PYGL), glutamate-ammonia ligase (GLUL), and glutamate dehydrogenase 1 (GLUD1) (171). The mechanism of death was proposed to be the activation of metabolic pathways leading to the overproduction of ROS (171). Ripk3-deficient mice were also found to be resistant to a model of pancreatitis disease progression. Strikingly, VSV infection revealed an important role for apoptosis and necrosis in viral immunity. VSV encodes the viral caspase inhibitor B13R/Spi2, and VSV-infected cells were indeed resistant to DR-induced apoptosis. However, they become sensitized to TNF-induced necrosis (186). Wildtype T cells were found to exhibit activation-induced cell death induced by anti-CD3 antibody, whereas VSV-infected Ripk3−/− T cells were significantly more resistant (173). In wildtype mice, VSV caused myeloid infiltration in visceral fat pads, and this was found to be absent in Ripk3−/− mice. The suggestion was that necrosis is an important aspect of virus-induced inflammation. There was detected a Ripk1-Ripk3 complex in the liver of wildtype VSV-infected mice, whereas the hepatic inflammation normally associated with VSV infection was not found in Ripk3−/− mice. This was associated with a dramatic increase in viral titers in Ripk3−/− mice. The conclusion is that necrosis and perhaps the inflammation associated with necrosis is an important part of innate viral immunity. Whether necrosis is also important for the resolution of an adaptive immune response awaits further experimentation.

The mechanisms of death operative in natural immune responses appear to be diverse. Apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis may each play a role, depending on the strategies of the infectious agent. In addition, they are not mutually exclusive or even independent pathways. Some of the pivotal regulatory factors characterized for apoptosis or autophagy also appear to guide the induction of necrotic mechanisms of death. Despite at least a decade of elegant work probing the nature of T-cell dynamics, we believe that there is still much to be discovered.

References

  • 1.James ER, Green DR. Infection and the origins of apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2002;9:355–357. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen Y, Zhao X. Shaping limbs by apoptosis. J Exp Zool. 1998;282:691–702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.White K, Grether ME, Abrams JM, Young L, Farrell K, Steller H. Genetic control of programmed cell death in Drosophila. Science. 1994;264:677–683. doi: 10.1126/science.8171319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yarmolinsky MB. Programmed cell death in bacterial populations. Science. 1995;267:836–837. doi: 10.1126/science.7846528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cornillon S, Foa C, Davoust J, Buonavista N, Gross JD, Golstein P. Programmed cell death in Dictyostelium. J Cell Sci. 1994;107:2691–2704. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.10.2691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gonzalez-Pastor JE, Hobbs EC, Losick R. Cannibalism by sporulating bacteria. Science. 2003;301:510–513. doi: 10.1126/science.1086462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lewis K. Programmed death in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64:503–514. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.64.3.503-514.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Horvath P, Barrangou R. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science. 2010;327:167–170. doi: 10.1126/science.1179555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marraffini LA, Sontheimer EJ. Self versus non-self discrimination during CRISPR RNA-directed immunity. Nature. 2010;463:568–571. doi: 10.1038/nature08703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hazan R, Engelberg-Kulka H. Escherichia coli mazEF-mediated cell death as a defense mechanism that inhibits the spread of phage P1. Mol Genet Genomics. 2004;272:227–234. doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-1048-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fineran PC, Blower TR, Foulds IJ, Humphreys DP, Lilley KS, Salmond GP. The phage abortive infection system, ToxIN, functions as a protein-RNA toxin-antitoxin pair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:894–899. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808832106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Uren AG, et al. Identification of paracaspases and metacaspases: two ancient families of caspase-like proteins, one of which plays a key role in MALT lymphoma. Mol Cell. 2000;6:961–967. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00094-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stephan JS, Herman PK. The regulation of autophagy in eukaryotic cells: do all roads pass through Atg1? Autophagy. 2006;2:146–148. doi: 10.4161/auto.2.2.2485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Otto GP, Wu MY, Kazgan N, Anderson OR, Kessin RH. Dictyostelium macroautophagy mutants vary in the severity of their developmental defects. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:15621–15629. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311139200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Roisin-Bouffay C, Luciani MF, Klein G, Levraud JP, Adam M, Golstein P. Developmental cell death in dictyostelium does not require paracaspase. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:11489–11494. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312741200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kosta A, Roisin-Bouffay C, Luciani MF, Otto GP, Kessin RH, Golstein P. Autophagy gene disruption reveals a non-vacuolar cell death pathway in Dictyostelium. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:48404–48409. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M408924200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Laporte C, et al. A necrotic cell death model in a protist. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:266–274. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Giusti C, et al. Necrotic cell death: from reversible mitochondrial uncoupling to irreversible lysosomal permeabilization. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:26–38. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen G, Zhuchenko O, Kuspa A. Immune-like phagocyte activity in the social amoeba. Science. 2007;317:678–681. doi: 10.1126/science.1143991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Clarke M. Recent insights into host-pathogen interactions from Dictyostelium. Cell Microbiol. 2010;12:283–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01413.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science. 2000;290:1717–1721. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Debnath J, Baehrecke EH, Kroemer G. Does autophagy contribute to cell death? Autophagy. 2005;1:66–74. doi: 10.4161/auto.1.2.1738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zmasek CM, Zhang Q, Ye Y, Godzik A. Surprising complexity of the ancestral apoptosis network. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R226. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Oberst A, Bender C, Green DR. Living with death: the evolution of the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in animals. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:1139–1146. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Clarke PG. Developmental cell death: morphological diversity and multiple mechanisms. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1990;181:195–213. doi: 10.1007/BF00174615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lockshin RA, Zakeri Z. Programmed cell death and apoptosis: origins of the theory. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:545–550. doi: 10.1038/35080097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vanlangenakker N, Berghe TV, Krysko DV, Festjens N, Vandenabeele P. Molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology of necrotic cell death. Curr Mol Med. 2008;8:207–220. doi: 10.2174/156652408784221306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Clarke PG, Clarke S. Nineteenth century research on naturally occurring cell death and related phenomena. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1996;193:81–99. doi: 10.1007/BF00214700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kerr JF, Wyllie AH, Currie AR. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer. 1972;26:239–257. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1972.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wyllie AH, Kerr JF, Currie AR. Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. Int Rev Cytol. 1980;68:251–306. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62312-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Raff MC. Social controls on cell survival and cell death. Nature. 1992;356:397–400. doi: 10.1038/356397a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Frisch SM, Screaton RA. Anoikis mechanisms. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001;13:555–562. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00251-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Plas DR, Rathmell JC, Thompson CB. Homeostatic control of lymphocyte survival: potential origins and implications. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:515–521. doi: 10.1038/ni0602-515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cory S, Huang DC, Adams JM. The Bcl-2 family: roles in cell survival and oncogenesis. Oncogene. 2003;22:8590–8607. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Danial NN, Korsmeyer SJ. Cell death: critical control points. Cell. 2004;116:205–219. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00046-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Green DR, Kroemer G. The pathophysiology of mitochondrial cell death. Science. 2004;305:626–629. doi: 10.1126/science.1099320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fadeel B, Orrenius S. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in human disease. J Intern Med. 2005;258:479–517. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.D’Agostino DM, Bernardi P, Chieco-Bianchi L, Ciminale V. Mitochondria as functional targets of proteins coded by human tumor viruses. Adv Cancer Res. 2005;94:87–142. doi: 10.1016/S0065-230X(05)94003-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bowie AG, Zhan J, Marshall WL. Viral appropriation of apoptotic and NF-kappaB signaling pathways. J Cell Biochem. 2004;91:1099–1108. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Boya P, Pauleau AL, Poncet D, Gonzalez-Polo RA, Zamzami N, Kroemer G. Viral proteins targeting mitochondria: controlling cell death. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1659:178–189. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Guiney DG. The role of host cell death in Salmonella infections. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2005;289:131–150. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27320-4_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Clem RJ. The role of apoptosis in defense against baculovirus infection in insects. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2005;289:113–129. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27320-4_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Callus BA, Vaux DL. Caspase inhibitors: viral, cellular and chemical. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:73–78. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Best SM. Viral subversion of apoptotic enzymes: escape from death row. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008;62:171–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.163009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Harris MH, Thompson CB. The role of the Bcl-2 family in the regulation of outer mitochondrial membrane permeability. Cell Death Differ. 2000;7:1182–1191. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chipuk JE, Bouchier-Hayes L, Green DR. Mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization during apoptosis: the innocent bystander scenario. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13:1396–1402. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu X, et al. Bcl-xl does not have to bind Bax to protect T cells from death. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2953–2961. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fletcher JI, et al. Apoptosis is triggered when prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins cannot restrain Bax. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:18081–18087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808691105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kim H, et al. Stepwise activation of BAX and BAK by tBID, BIM, and PUMA initiates mitochondrial apoptosis. Mol Cell. 2009;36:487–499. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Saelens X, Festjens N, Vande Walle L, van Gurp M, van Loo G, Vandenabeele P. Toxic proteins released from mitochondria in cell death. Oncogene. 2004;23:2861–2874. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fullard JF, Kale A, Baker NE. Clearance of apoptotic corpses. Apoptosis. 2009;14:1029–1037. doi: 10.1007/s10495-009-0335-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Krysko DV, Vandenabeele P. From regulation of dying cell engulfment to development of anti-cancer therapy. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:29–38. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wilson NS, Dixit V, Ashkenazi A. Death receptor signal transducers: nodes of coordination in immune signaling networks. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:348–355. doi: 10.1038/ni.1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Benschop R, Wei T, Na S. Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 21: TNFR-related death receptor-6, DR6. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;647:186–194. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-89520-8_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.LeBlanc HN, Ashkenazi A. Apo2L/TRAIL and its death and decoy receptors. Cell Death Differ. 2003;10:66–75. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Peter ME, Krammer PH. Mechanisms of CD95 (APO-1/Fas)-mediated apoptosis. Curr Opin Immunol. 1998;10:545–551. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(98)80222-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lum JJ, et al. Growth factor regulation of autophagy and cell survival in the absence of apoptosis. Cell. 2005;120:237–248. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yorimitsu T, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy: molecular machinery for self-eating. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12 (Suppl.):1542–1552. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tsukada M, Ohsumi Y. Isolation and characterization of autophagy-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1993;333:169–174. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80398-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yorimitsu T, Klionsky DJ. Endoplasmic reticulum stress: a new pathway to induce autophagy. Autophagy. 2007;3:160–162. doi: 10.4161/auto.3653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mari M, Reggiori F. Atg9 trafficking in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Autophagy. 2007;3:145–148. doi: 10.4161/auto.3608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mizushima N, Sugita H, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi Y. A new protein conjugation system in human The counterpart of the yeast Apg12p conjugation system essential for autophagy. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:33889–33892. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.51.33889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ichimura Y, et al. A ubiquitin-like system mediates protein lipidation. Nature. 2000;408:488–492. doi: 10.1038/35044114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ohsumi Y. Molecular dissection of autophagy: two ubiquitin-like systems. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:211–216. doi: 10.1038/35056522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tanida I, et al. Apg7p/Cvt2p: a novel protein-activating enzyme essential for autophagy. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10:1367–1379. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.5.1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Shintani T, Mizushima N, Ogawa Y, Matsuura A, Noda T, Ohsumi Y. Apg10p, a novel protein-conjugating enzyme essential for autophagy in yeast. EMBO J. 1999;18:5234–5241. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.19.5234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Komatsu M, et al. Impairment of starvation-induced and constitutive autophagy in Atg7-deficient mice. J Cell Biol. 2005;169:425–434. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200412022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Petiot A, Pattingre S, Arico S, Meley D, Codogno P. Diversity of signaling controls of macroautophagy in mammalian cells. Cell Struct Funct. 2002;27:431–441. doi: 10.1247/csf.27.431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nishida Y, et al. Discovery of Atg5/Atg7-independent alternative macroautophagy. Nature. 2009;461:654–658. doi: 10.1038/nature08455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tettamanti G, Salo E, Gonzalez-Estevez C, Felix DA, Grimaldi A, de Eguileor M. Autophagy in invertebrates: insights into development, regeneration and body remodeling. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14:116–125. doi: 10.2174/138161208783378716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Samara C, Tavernarakis N. Autophagy and cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14:97–115. doi: 10.2174/138161208783378770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lindsten T, et al. The combined functions of proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members bak and bax are essential for normal development of multiple tissues. Mol Cell. 2000;6:1389–1399. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00136-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Maiuri MC, Zalckvar E, Kimchi A, Kroemer G. Self-eating and self-killing: crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:741–752. doi: 10.1038/nrm2239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Baehrecke EH. Autophagy: dual roles in life and death? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:505–510. doi: 10.1038/nrm1666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pyo JO, et al. Essential roles of Atg5 and FADD in autophagic cell death: dissection of autophagic cell death into vacuole formation and cell death. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:20722–20729. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413934200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rubinsztein DC, et al. Autophagy and its possible roles in nervous system diseases, damage and repair. Autophagy. 2005;1:11–22. doi: 10.4161/auto.1.1.1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kuma A, Matsui M, Mizushima N. LC3, an autophagosome marker, can be incorporated into protein aggregates independent of autophagy: caution in the interpretation of LC3 localization. Autophagy. 2007;3:323–328. doi: 10.4161/auto.4012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Degterev A, et al. Chemical inhibitor of nonapoptotic cell death with therapeutic potential for ischemic brain injury. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1:112–119. doi: 10.1038/nchembio711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kroemer G, Levine B. Autophagic cell death: the story of a misnomer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:1004–1010. doi: 10.1038/nrm2527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tolkovsky AM, Xue L, Fletcher GC, Borutaite V. Mitochondrial disappearance from cells: a clue to the role of autophagy in programmed cell death and disease? Biochimie. 2002;84:233–240. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(02)01371-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Vazquez CL, Colombo MI. Beclin 1 modulates the anti-apoptotic activity of Bcl-2: insights from a pathogen infection system. Autophagy. 2010;6:177–178. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.1.10743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chinnaiyan AM, O’Rourke K, Tewari M, Dixit VM. FADD, a novel death domain-containing protein, interacts with the death domain of Fas and initiates apoptosis. Cell. 1995;81:505–512. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90071-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Thorburn J, et al. Selective inactivation of a Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD)-dependent apoptosis and autophagy pathway in immortal epithelial cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:1189–1199. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-10-0906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Liang XH, et al. Protection against fatal Sindbis virus encephalitis by beclin, a novel Bcl-2-interacting protein. J Virol. 1998;72:8586–8596. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.11.8586-8596.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Pattingre S, et al. Bcl-2 antiapoptotic proteins inhibit Beclin 1-dependent autophagy. Cell. 2005;122:927–939. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Liu Y, Schiff M, Czymmek K, Talloczy Z, Levine B, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Autophagy regulates programmed cell death during the plant innate immune response. Cell. 2005;121:567–577. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Pua HH, Guo J, Komatsu M, He YW. Autophagy is essential for mitochondrial clearance in mature T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2009;182:4046–4055. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0801143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Deretic V, Levine B. Autophagy, immunity, and microbial adaptations. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;5:527–549. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Virgin HW, Levine B. Autophagy genes in immunity. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:461–470. doi: 10.1038/ni.1726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Nakagawa I, et al. Autophagy defends cells against invading group A Streptococcus. Science. 2004;306:1037–1040. doi: 10.1126/science.1103966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Gutierrez MG, Master SS, Singh SB, Taylor GA, Colombo MI, Deretic V. Autophagy is a defense mechanism inhibiting BCG and Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in infected macrophages. Cell. 2004;119:753–766. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ogawa M, Yoshimori T, Suzuki T, Sagara H, Mizushima N, Sasakawa C. Escape of intracellular Shigella from autophagy. Science. 2005;307:727–731. doi: 10.1126/science.1106036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Orvedahl A, Levine B. Autophagy and viral neurovirulence. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:1747–1756. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01175.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Vyas JM, Van der Veen AG, Ploegh HL. The known unknowns of antigen processing and presentation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:607–618. doi: 10.1038/nri2368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Schmid D, Munz C. Innate and adaptive immunity through autophagy. Immunity. 2007;27:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Schweichel JU, Merker HJ. The morphology of various types of cell death in prenatal tissues. Teratology. 1973;7:253–266. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420070306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Pilar G, Landmesser L. Ultrastructural differences during embryonic cell death in normal and peripherally deprived ciliary ganglia. J Cell Biol. 1976;68:339–356. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Chu-Wang IW, Oppenheim RW. Cell death of motoneurons in the chick embryo spinal cord. I. A light and electron microscopic study of naturally occurring and induced cell loss during development. J Comp Neurol. 1978;177:33–57. doi: 10.1002/cne.901770105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Sohal GS, Weidman TA. Ultrastructural sequence of embryonic cell death in normal and peripherally deprived trachlear nucleus. Exp Neurol. 1978;61:53–64. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(78)90180-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Festjens N, Vanden Berghe T, Vandenabeele P. Necrosis, a well-orchestrated form of cell demise: signalling cascades, important mediators and concomitant immune response. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1757:1371–1387. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Borsello T, Mottier V, Castagne V, Clarke PG. Ultrastructure of retinal ganglion cell death after axotomy in chick embryos. J Comp Neurol. 2002;453:361–371. doi: 10.1002/cne.10411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Lefevre K, Danthe EE, Castagne V. Involvement of cyclin-dependent kinases in axotomy-induced retinal ganglion cell death. J Comp Neurol. 2002;447:72–81. doi: 10.1002/cne.10215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Li L, Houenou LJ, Wu W, Lei M, Prevette DM, Oppenheim RW. Characterization of spinal motoneuron degeneration following different types of peripheral nerve injury in neonatal and adult mice. J Comp Neurol. 1998;396:158–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Tardito S, et al. Non-apoptotic programmed cell death induced by a copper(II) complex in human fibrosarcoma cells. Histochem Cell Biol. 2006;126:473–482. doi: 10.1007/s00418-006-0183-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Barkla DH, Gibson PR. The fate of epithelial cells in the human large intestine. Pathology. 1999;31:230–238. doi: 10.1080/003130299105043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Roach HI, Clarke NM. Physiological cell death of chondrocytes in vivo is not confined to apoptosis. New observations on the mammalian growth plate. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:601–613. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b4.9846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Halestrap AP. Calcium, mitochondria and reperfusion injury: a pore way to die. Biochem Soc Trans. 2006;34:232–237. doi: 10.1042/BST20060232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Tsujimoto Y, Shimizu S. Role of the mitochondrial membrane permeability transition in cell death. Apoptosis. 2007;12:835–840. doi: 10.1007/s10495-006-0525-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Halestrap AP. What is the mitochondrial permeability transition pore? J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009;46:821–831. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Schinzel AC, et al. Cyclophilin D is a component of mitochondrial permeability transition and mediates neuronal cell death after focal cerebral ischemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:12005–12010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505294102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Nakagawa T, et al. Cyclophilin D-dependent mitochondrial permeability transition regulates some necrotic but not apoptotic cell death. Nature. 2005;434:652–658. doi: 10.1038/nature03317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Baines CP, et al. Loss of cyclophilin D reveals a critical role for mitochondrial permeability transition in cell death. Nature. 2005;434:658–662. doi: 10.1038/nature03434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Grooten J, Goossens V, Vanhaesebroeck B, Fiers W. Cell membrane permeabilization and cellular collapse, followed by loss of dehydrogenase activity: early events in tumour necrosis factor-induced cytotoxicity. Cytokine. 1993;5:546–555. doi: 10.1016/s1043-4666(05)80003-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Vercammen D, et al. Inhibition of caspases increases the sensitivity of L929 cells to necrosis mediated by tumor necrosis factor. J Exp Med. 1998;187:1477–1485. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.9.1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Vercammen D, et al. Dual signaling of the Fas receptor: initiation of both apoptotic and necrotic cell death pathways. J Exp Med. 1998;188:919–930. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.5.919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Holler N, et al. Fas triggers an alternative, caspase-8-independent cell death pathway using the kinase RIP as effector molecule. Nat Immunol. 2000;1:489–495. doi: 10.1038/82732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Degterev A, et al. Identification of RIP1 kinase as a specific cellular target of necrostatins. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:313–321. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Blattman JN, et al. Estimating the precursor frequency of naive antigen-specific CD8 T cells. J Exp Med. 2002;195:657–664. doi: 10.1084/jem.20001021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Masopust D, Murali-Krishna K, Ahmed R. Quantitating the magnitude of the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-specific CD8 T-cell response: it is even bigger than we thought. J Virol. 2007;81:2002–2011. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01459-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Fuller MJ, Khanolkar A, Tebo AE, Zajac AJ. Maintenance, loss, and resurgence of T cell responses during acute, protracted, and chronic viral infections. J Immunol. 2004;172:4204–4214. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.7.4204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Mueller SN, Ahmed R. High antigen levels are the cause of T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:8623–8628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809818106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Marrack P, Kappler J. Control of T cell viability. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:765–787. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Hand TW, Kaech SM. Intrinsic and extrinsic control of effector T cell survival and memory T cell development. Immunol Res. 2009;45:46–61. doi: 10.1007/s12026-008-8027-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Hildeman DA, et al. Activated T cell death in vivo mediated by proapoptotic bcl-2 family member bim. Immunity. 2002;16:759–767. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00322-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Pellegrini M, Belz G, Bouillet P, Strasser A. Shutdown of an acute T cell immune response to viral infection is mediated by the proapoptotic Bcl-2 homology 3-only protein Bim. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:14175–14180. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2336198100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Wojciechowski S, Jordan MB, Zhu Y, White J, Zajac AJ, Hildeman DA. Bim mediates apoptosis of CD127(lo) effector T cells and limits T cell memory. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36:1694–1706. doi: 10.1002/eji.200635897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Bauer A, et al. The NF-kappaB regulator Bcl-3 and the BH3-only proteins Bim and Puma control the death of activated T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:10979–10984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603625103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Fischer SF, Belz GT, Strasser A. BH3-only protein Puma contributes to death of antigen- specific T cells during shutdown of an immune response to acute viral infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:3035–3040. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706913105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Rathmell JC, Lindsten T, Zong WX, Cinalli RM, Thompson CB. Deficiency in Bak and Bax perturbs thymic selection and lymphoid homeostasis. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:932–939. doi: 10.1038/ni834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Petschner F, Zimmerman C, Strasser A, Grillot D, Nunez G, Pircher H. Constitutive expression of Bcl-xL or Bcl-2 prevents peptide antigen-induced T cell deletion but does not influence T cell homeostasis after a viral infection. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28:560–569. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199802)28:02<560::AID-IMMU560>3.0.CO;2-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Nussbaum AK, Whitton JL. The contraction phase of virus-specific CD8+ T cells is unaffected by a pan-caspase inhibitor. J Immunol. 2004;173:6611–6618. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.11.6611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Jameson SC. Maintaining the norm: T-cell homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:547–556. doi: 10.1038/nri853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Hildeman DA, Zhu Y, Mitchell TC, Kappler J, Marrack P. Molecular mechanisms of activated T cell death in vivo. Curr Opin Immunol. 2002;14:354–359. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(02)00335-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Prlic M, Bevan MJ. Exploring regulatory mechanisms of CD8+ T cell contraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:16689–16694. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808997105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Brunner T, et al. Cell-autonomous Fas CD95/Fas-ligand interaction mediates activation-induced apoptosis in T-cell hybridomas. Nature. 1995;373:441–444. doi: 10.1038/373441a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Dhein J, Walczak H, Baumler C, Debatin KM, Krammer PH. Autocrine T-cell suicide mediated by APO-1/(Fas/CD95) Nature. 1995;373:438–441. doi: 10.1038/373438a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Russell JH, Rush B, Weaver C, Wang R. Mature T cells of autoimmune lpr/lpr mice have a defect in antigen-stimulated suicide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:4409–4413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Lenardo M, et al. Mature T lymphocyte apoptosis - immune regulation in a dynamic and unpredictable antigenic environment. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:221–253. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Reich A, Korner H, Sedgwick JD, Pircher H. Immune down-regulation and peripheral deletion of CD8 T cells does not require TNF receptor-ligand interactions nor CD95 (Fas, APO-1) Eur J Immunol. 2000;30:678–682. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200002)30:2<678::AID-IMMU678>3.0.CO;2-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Zimmermann C, Rawiel M, Blaser C, Kaufmann M, Pircher H. Homeostatic regulation of CD8+ T cells after antigen challenge in the absence of Fas (CD95) Eur J Immunol. 1996;26:2903–2910. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830261215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Suresh M, Singh A, Fischer C. Role of tumor necrosis factor receptors in regulating CD8 T-cell responses during acute lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection. J Virol. 2005;79:202–213. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.1.202-213.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Hao Z, Hampel B, Yagita H, Rajewsky K. T cell-specific ablation of Fas leads to Fas ligand-mediated lymphocyte depletion and inflammatory pulmonary fibrosis. J Exp Med. 2004;199:1355–1365. doi: 10.1084/jem.20032196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Zhou S, Ou R, Huang L, Moskophidis D. Critical role for perforin-, Fas/FasL-, and TNFR1-mediated cytotoxic pathways in down-regulation of antigen-specific T cells during persistent viral infection. J Virol. 2002;76:829–840. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.2.829-840.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Stranges PB, et al. Elimination of antigen-presenting cells and autoreactive T cells by Fas contributes to prevention of autoimmunity. Immunity. 2007;26:629–641. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Hutcheson J, et al. Combined deficiency of proapoptotic regulators Bim and Fas results in the early onset of systemic autoimmunity. Immunity. 2008;28:206–217. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Hughes PD, Belz GT, Fortner KA, Budd RC, Strasser A, Bouillet P. Apoptosis regulators Fas and Bim cooperate in shutdown of chronic immune responses and prevention of autoimmunity. Immunity. 2008;28:197–205. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Weant AE, Michalek RD, Khan IU, Holbrook BC, Willingham MC, Grayson JM. Apoptosis regulators Bim and Fas function concurrently to control autoimmunity and CD8+ T cell contraction. Immunity. 2008;28:218–230. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Zhang J, Cado D, Chen A, Kabra NH, Winoto A. Fas-mediated apoptosis and activation-induced T-cell proliferation are defective in mice lacking FADD/Mort1. Nature. 1998;392:296–300. doi: 10.1038/32681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Newton K, Harris AW, Bath ML, Smith KGC, Strasser A. A dominant interfering mutant of FADD/MORT1 enhances deletion of autoreactive thymocytes and inhibits proliferation of mature T lymphocytes. EMBO J. 1998;17:706–718. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.3.706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Walsh CM, Wen BG, Chinnaiyan AM, O’Rourke K, Dixit VM, Hedrick SM. A role for FADD in T cell activation and development. Immunity. 1998;8:439–449. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80549-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Hueber AO, Zornig M, Bernard AM, Chautan M, Evan G. A dominant negative Fas-associated death domain protein mutant inhibits proliferation and leads to impaired calcium mobilization in both T-cells and fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:10453–10462. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.14.10453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Chun HJ, et al. Pleiotropic defects in lymphocyte activation caused by caspase-8 mutations lead to human immunodeficiency. Nature. 2002;419:395–399. doi: 10.1038/nature01063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Beisner DR, Ch’en IL, Kolla RV, Hoffmann A, Hedrick SM. Cutting edge: innate immunity conferred by B cells is regulated by caspase-8. J Immunol. 2005;175:3469–3473. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.6.3469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Salmena L, et al. Essential role for caspase 8 in T-cell homeostasis and T-cell-mediated immunity. Genes Dev. 2003;17:883–895. doi: 10.1101/gad.1063703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Lemmers B, et al. Essential role for caspase-8 in Toll-like receptors and NFkappaB signaling. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:7416–7423. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606721200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Imtiyaz HZ, et al. The Fas-associated death domain protein is required in apoptosis and TLR-induced proliferative responses in B cells. J Immunol. 2006;176:6852–6861. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.11.6852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Zhang J, Kabra NH, Cado D, Kang C, Winoto A. FADD-deficient T cells exhibit a disaccord in regulation of the cell cycle machinery. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:29815–29818. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103838200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Arechiga AF, et al. A Fas-associated death domain protein/caspase-8-signaling axis promotes S-phase entry and maintains S6 kinase activity in T cells responding to IL-2. J Immunol. 2007;179:5291–5300. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Bell BD, et al. FADD and caspase-8 control the outcome of autophagic signaling in T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:16677–16682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808597105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Ch’en IL, et al. Antigen-mediated T cell expansion regulated by parallel pathways of death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:17463–17468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808043105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Su H, et al. Requirement for caspase-8 in NF-kappaB activation by antigen receptor. Science. 2005;307:1465–1468. doi: 10.1126/science.1104765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Arechiga AF, et al. Cutting edge: FADD is not required for antigen receptor-mediated NF-kappaB activation. J Immunol. 2005;175:7800–7804. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.7800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Yu L, et al. Regulation of an ATG7-beclin 1 program of autophagic cell death by caspase-8. Science. 2004;304:1500–1502. doi: 10.1126/science.1096645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Lin Y, Devin A, Rodriguez Y, Liu ZG. Cleavage of the death domain kinase RIP by caspase-8 prompts TNF-induced apoptosis. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2514–2526. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.19.2514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Skaletskaya A, Bartle LM, Chittenden T, McCormick AL, Mocarski ES, Goldmacher VS. A cytomegalovirus-encoded inhibitor of apoptosis that suppresses caspase-8 activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:7829–7834. doi: 10.1073/pnas.141108798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Hedrick SM. The acquired immune system: a vantage from beneath. Immunity. 2004;21:607–615. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Declercq W, Vanden Berghe T, Vandenabeele P. RIP kinases at the crossroads of cell death and survival. Cell. 2009;138:229–232. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Inohara N, et al. An induced proximity model for NF-kappa B activation in the Nod1/RICK and RIP signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:27823–27831. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003415200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Watanabe T, Kitani A, Murray PJ, Strober W. NOD2 is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor 2-mediated T helper type 1 responses. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:800–808. doi: 10.1038/ni1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Micheau O, Tschopp J. Induction of TNF receptor I-mediated apoptosis via two sequential signaling complexes. Cell. 2003;114:181–190. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00521-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Zhang DW, et al. RIP3, an energy metabolism regulator that switches TNF-induced cell death from apoptosis to necrosis. Science. 2009;325:332–336. doi: 10.1126/science.1172308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.He S, et al. Receptor interacting protein kinase-3 determines cellular necrotic response to TNF-alpha. Cell. 2009;137:1100–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Cho YS, et al. Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1-RIP3 complex regulates programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation. Cell. 2009;137:1112–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Muppidi JR, Tschopp J, Siegel RM. Life and death decisions: secondary complexes and lipid rafts in TNF receptor family signal transduction. Immunity. 2004;21:461–465. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Ea CK, Deng L, Xia ZP, Pineda G, Chen ZJ. Activation of IKK by TNFalpha requires site-specific ubiquitination of RIP1 and polyubiquitin binding by NEMO. Mol Cell. 2006;22:245–257. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Li H, Kobayashi M, Blonska M, You Y, Lin X. Ubiquitination of RIP is required for tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced NF-kappaB activation. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:13636–13643. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600620200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Liu ZG, Hsu H, Goeddel DV, Karin M. Dissection of TNF receptor 1 effector functions: JNK activation is not linked to apoptosis while NF-kappaB activation prevents cell death. Cell. 1996;87:565–576. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81375-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Devin A, Lin Y, Liu ZG. The role of the death-domain kinase RIP in tumour-necrosis-factor-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases. EMBO Rep. 2003;4:623–627. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.embor854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Lee TH, Shank J, Cusson N, Kelliher MA. The kinase activity of Rip1 is not required for tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced IkappaB kinase or p38 MAP kinase activation or for the ubiquitination of Rip1 by Traf2. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:33185–33191. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M404206200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Trompouki E, Hatzivassiliou E, Tsichritzis T, Farmer H, Ashworth A, Mosialos G. CYLD is a deubiquitinating enzyme that negatively regulates NF-kappaB activation by TNFR family members. Nature. 2003;424:793–796. doi: 10.1038/nature01803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Kovalenko A, Chable-Bessia C, Cantarella G, Israel A, Wallach D, Courtois G. The tumour suppressor CYLD negatively regulates NF-kappaB signalling by deubiquitination. Nature. 2003;424:801–805. doi: 10.1038/nature01802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Wertz IE, et al. De-ubiquitination and ubiquitin ligase domains of A20 downregulate NF-kappaB signalling. Nature. 2004;430:694–699. doi: 10.1038/nature02794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Wang L, Du F, Wang X. TNF-alpha induces two distinct caspase-8 activation pathways. Cell. 2008;133:693–703. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Silke J, Brink R. Regulation of TNFRSF and innate immune signalling complexes by TRAFs and cIAPs. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:35–45. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Chang LF, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase itch couples JNK activation to TNF alpha-induced cell death by inducing c-FLIPL turnover. Cell. 2006;124:601–613. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Li M, Beg AA. Induction of necrotic-like cell death by tumor necrosis factor alpha and caspase inhibitors: novel mechanism for killing virus-infected cells. J Virol. 2000;74:7470–7477. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.16.7470-7477.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES