Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 7;117(7):2166–2178. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-306563

Table 1.

Validation of select GABP-activated direct target genes in HSCs

Gene symbol Gene name Fold enrichment on ChIP-Seq of human HPCs Validation of GABP binding in Lin− BM cells (fold enrichment) Validation of GABP binding in c-Kit+Lin− BM cells (fold enrichment) Validation of gene-expression changes in GABPα-null Flt3−LSKs (ratio of KO/WT)
Apoptosis regulation
    Bcl2 Bcl-2 (B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2) 14* 2.6 ± 1.3† 3.4 ± 1.8† 0.06 ± 0.09‡
    Bcl2l1 Bcl-XL (Bcl-2–like 1) 18 35.5 ± 15.1‡ 33.7 ± 5.9‡ 0.24 ± 0.25‡
    Mcl1 Mcl-1 (myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1) 6 6.9 ± 3.5‡ 5.8 ± 1.8‡ 0.26 ± 0.09‡
Transcription factors
    Zfx Zfx (zinc finger protein X-linked) 14 2.7 ± 1.0‡ 2.1 ± 0.2‡ 0.03 ± 0.04‡
    Etv6 Etv6/Tel (ets variant gene 6) 6 2.1 ± 1.0† 1.6 ± 1.0§ 0.24 ± 0.11‡
    Smad4 Smad4 (MAD homolog 4) 14 1.9 ± 0.7† 2.2 ± 0.8† 0.29 ± 0.26‡
    Foxo3 Foxo3a (forkhead box O3) 4 1.8 ± 0.5‡ 2.9 ± 1.7† 0.27 ± 0.13‡
    Gabpa GABPα 90 8.2 ± 3.2‡ 39.5 ± 7.9‡ 0.09 ± 0.15‡
    Gabpb1 GABPβ1 32 2.1 ± 0.6‡ 2.1 ± 1.0† 0.28 ± 0.25‡
DNA repair
    Atm ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated homolog) 43 5.1 ± 3.1† 3.5 ± 0.8‡ The Atm transcript was not consistently detected in KO cells.
Telomere maintenance
    Terf2 TRF2 (telomeric repeat binding factor 2) 20 8.0 ± 2.8‡ 5.2 ± 1.6‡ 0.42 ± 0.32†
Signaling molecules
    Pten PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) 17 1.9 ± 0.6† 1.5 ± 0.5† 0.11 ± 0.11‡
DNA methylation
    Dnmt1 DNMT-1 (DNA methyltransferase 1) 19 7.4 ± 1.9‡ 4.7 ± 1.4‡ 0.54 ± 0.17‡
Histone acetylation
    Ep300 p300 (E1A binding protein p300) 11 2.3 ± 0.6‡ 1.8 ± 0.2‡ 0.38 ± 0.16‡
    Myst4 MYST-4 (MYST histone acetyltransferase 4) 13 9.5 ± 3.6‡ 10.9 ± 4.4‡ 0.2 ± 0.25‡
Chromatin remodeling
    Smarca2 Brm/BAF190B 12 2.3 ± 1.6§ 1.9 ± 0.8† 0.05 ± 0.05‡
    Smarca4 Brg1/BAF190A 15 3.5 ± 1.9† 2.9 ± 1.1‡ 0.38 ± 0.11‡

KO indicates Mx1Cre-GABPαFL/−; and WT, Mx1Cre-GABPαFL/+.

Select genes under different functional categories were validated for GABP binding and GABP-dependent expression. The gene symbols, commonly gene names, and fold enrichment of GABP binding in human HPCs were summarized in first 3 columns. Lin− and c-Kit+Lin− murine BM cells from WT C57BL/6 mice were used for validation of GABP binding using quantitative PCR. Data are means ± SD of 2 independent experiments with each sample measured in duplicates or triplicates. For validation of gene-expression changes, Flt3−LSK cells were sorted from pIpC-treated Mx1Cre-GABPαFL/+ and Mx1Cre-GABPαFL/− mice, cDNA amplified and quantitatively determined. Data are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments with each sample measured in duplicates. Statistical significance was determined using the Student t test.

Note that in terms of fold enrichment, the binding of GABPα to the Etv6, Pten, Ep300, and Smarca2 gene loci was relatively weak especially in c-Kit+Lin− murine BM cells. One possible explanation might be that the affinity of GABPα binding to these loci was low and the detection was limited by low numbers of c-Kit+Lin− BM cells that can be obtained. Alternatively, enriched binding of GABPα might be more specific in primitive HSCs, and the binding signal was diluted by other non-HSC cells included in the c-Kit+Lin− BM cells.

*

Binding of GABP in the BCL2 locus was in intron 1, more than 2 kb from its TIS (see Figure 4A).

†

P < .05.

‡

P < .01.

§

Not significant.