Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Biol. 2011 Mar 8;21(5):353–362. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.053

Regulation of response properties and operating range of the AFD thermosensory neurons by cGMP signaling

Sara M Wasserman 1,2, Matthew Beverly 1, Harold W Bell 1, Piali Sengupta 1,3
PMCID: PMC3057529  NIHMSID: NIHMS270272  PMID: 21315599

SUMMARY

Background

The neuronal mechanisms that encode specific stimulus features in order to elicit defined behavioral responses are poorly understood. C. elegans forms a memory of its cultivation temperature (Tc) and exhibits distinct behaviors in different temperature ranges relative to Tc. In particular, C. elegans tracks isotherms only in a narrow temperature band near Tc. Tc memory is in part encoded by the threshold of responsiveness (T*AFD) of the AFD thermosensory neuron pair to temperature stimuli. However, since AFD thermosensory responses appear to be similar at all examined temperatures above T*AFD, the mechanisms that generate specific behaviors in defined temperature ranges remain to be determined.

Results

Here, we show that the AFD neurons respond to the sinusoidal variations in thermal stimuli followed by animals during isothermal tracking (IT) behavior only in a narrow temperature range near Tc. We find that mutations in the AFD-expressed gcy-8 receptor guanylyl cyclase (rGC) gene result in defects in the execution of IT behavior, and are associated with defects in the responses of the AFD neurons to oscillating thermal stimuli. In contrast, mutations in the gcy-18 or gcy-23 rGCs alter the temperature range in which IT behavior is exhibited. Alteration of intracellular cGMP levels via rGC mutations or addition of cGMP analogs shift the lower and upper ranges of the temperature range of IT behavior in part via alteration in T*AFD.

Conclusions

Our observations provide insights into the mechanisms by which a single sensory neuron type encodes features of a given stimulus to generate different behaviors in defined zones.

INTRODUCTION

Animals exhibit defined behaviors in response to specific aspects of a given sensory stimulus including its temporal dynamics, magnitude of change, or absolute value. Stimulus features could be encoded by peripheral sensory neurons with defined operating ranges [1–3] or by filtering and integration in neuronal networks [4, 5]. Much remains to be understood regarding the mechanisms by which specific stimulus features are represented in neuronal responses in both the peripheral and central nervous system.

C. elegans thermosensation provides an excellent system in which to explore the mechanisms underlying sensory neuron response properties. Within its physiological temperature range, C. elegans exhibits different behaviors in different temperature ranges relative to its cultivation temperature (Tc) [6, 7] (Figure 1A). In a narrow temperature band near Tc, C. elegans tracks isotherms (isothermal tracking – IT), whereas at higher temperatures, C. elegans exhibits negative thermotaxis [6–9] (Figure 1A). Tc memory is plastic and can be reset upon cultivation of worms at different temperatures [6, 10]. Thus, the C. elegans nervous system encodes a memory of Tc, and compares the ambient temperature to this memory to direct specific behaviors in defined temperature bands within a broad temperature range.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The AFD thermosensory neurons and TAX-4 CNG channel are required to initiate and maintain isothermal tracks.

A) Diagrammatic representation of behaviors exhibited in different temperature ranges relative to Tc.

B–C) Diagrammatic representations of intracellular calcium (Ca2+) changes (blue lines) in the AFD neurons in response to an upward oscillating temperature stimulus (green lines). Tc is 15°C (B) or 20°C (C). T*AFD refers to the temperature at which intracellular Ca2+ dynamics are first observed in the AFD neurons. Note that T*AFD is altered in a Tc-dependent manner. Adapted from [12].

D–F) Scatter plots of numbers and lengths of isothermal tracks (>3.6 mm; see Supplemental Experimental Procedures) exhibited by wild-type (D), tax-4(p678) (E) and AFD-ablated (F) animals (170 animals per strain) grown at the indicated Tc on a linear thermal gradient of 0.9°C/cm steepness. The red dotted lines indicate the total lengths of isothermal tracks in the top quartile of all measured wild-type isothermal track lengths in the assay at the indicated temperatures (also see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Histograms below indicate the total numbers of isothermal tracks at different temperatures. 10 independent assays (n=17 animals each) were conducted for each genotype. See also Figure S1.

G) Average isothermal track numbers exhibited by animals of the indicated genotypes. * indicates values that are different from those of corresponding wild-type animals at p < 0.05 using one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s posthoc test. Error bars are the SEM. The average from 10 independent assays (n=17 animals each) for each genotype are shown.

The AFD sensory neuron pair is a major thermosensory neuron type in C. elegans [7]. Physical ablation of the AFD neurons abolishes IT behavior, and severely affects negative thermotaxis [7, 11]. Tc memory appears to be partly stored in the AFD neurons as a threshold (referred to as T*AFD) above which these neurons exhibit thermosensory responses (Figure 1B, 1C) [10, 12–14]. However, the responses of the AFD neurons to examined thermal stimuli appear to be similar at all temperatures above T*AFD [12, 14, 15] (Figure 1B, 1C), raising the question of how different behaviors are elicited in different temperature ranges relative to Tc.

Thermosensory signal transduction in the AFD neurons is mediated via cGMP signaling. Animals mutant for the TAX-2 and TAX-4 cGMP-gated channels, or triply mutant for the GCY-8, GCY-18 and GCY-23 receptor guanylyl cyclases (rGCs) are atactic, and fail to exhibit temperature-induced currents in the AFD neurons [6, 7, 13, 15]. These rGCs are expressed specifically or selectively in the AFD neurons, and are localized to their sensory receptive endings [16–18]. However, the roles of individual rGCs in the regulation of IT behavior have not been examined. In addition, whether mutations in single gcy genes affect specific aspects of AFD thermosensitivity has not been investigated.

Here we show that the AFD neurons respond robustly to thermal stimuli that mimic the thermosensory inputs animals encounter when tracking isotherms, but that they do so only in the range in which IT behavior is exhibited. We find that GCY-8, but not other rGCs, regulates the ability of the AFD neurons to respond to this stimulus and execute IT. Alterations in cGMP signaling shift the lower and upper bounds of the range in which the AFD neurons are able to respond to this stimulus and elicit IT behavior. Our results indicate that individual rGCs regulate different aspects of AFD thermosensory functions, and that precise regulation of intracellular cGMP signaling regulates the temperature range in which the AFD neurons are able to respond to specific thermal stimuli. These observations suggest a mechanism by which regulation of AFD neuronal activity contributes to the generation of different behaviors in distinct temperature zones above Tc.

RESULTS

Animals lacking the AFD neurons, or mutant for the tax-4 cyclic nucleotide-gated gene, fail to initiate and maintain isothermal tracks

Mutations in the tax-4 cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channel have been shown to abolish AFD thermosensitivity and IT [6, 7, 13, 15]. We first determined whether the inability of tax-4 mutants to track isotherms arises from defects in initiation and/or maintenance of IT behavior. Animals were grown at a Tc of 15°C or 20°C and placed on a 0.9°C/cm linear thermal gradient that includes the temperatures at which IT behavior is expected. We quantified the numbers of tracks perpendicular to the direction of the gradient to obtain a measure of initiated isothermal tracks, as well as isothermal track lengths to determine maintenance of IT behavior. Under our experimental conditions, the average length of an isothermal track on a plate in the absence of an imposed thermal gradient is ~3.6 mm (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Quantification of isothermal track numbers that were longer than 3.6 mm on a thermal gradient showed that wild-type animals initiated more tracks in a temperature band near Tc (Figure 1D). Moreover, in the presence of a gradient, wild-type animals maintained movement along isotherms near Tc as evident from longer isothermal track lengths in this temperature band (Figure 1D).

In contrast, we found that the isothermal tracks initiated by tax-4(p678) mutants were evenly distributed across the gradient (Figure 1E). Moreover, tax-4 mutants initiated fewer of these tracks overall (Figure 1G), and exhibited only rare longer tracks (Figure 1E). Since IT behavior requires forward movement and suppression of abrupt reorientation events or turns [8, 9], we confirmed that the tracking defects of tax-4 mutants were not due to increased basal turning rates or changes in forward movement velocity (Figure S1). Consistent with a major role of the AFD neurons in regulating IT behavior, animals in which the AFD neurons had been genetically ablated (generous gift from M. Goodman, Stanford University) also initiated significantly fewer isothermal tracks (Figure 1F, 1G) that were not maintained (Figure 1F). These results indicate that the AFD neurons and TAX-4 CNG channel are required to both initiate and maintain isothermal tracks.

The GCY-8 rGC is required for isothermal tracking behavior

We next determined whether one or more of the AFD-expressed GCY-8, GCY-18 or GCY-23 rGCs regulate IT behavior. We first confirmed that all examined gcy mutants exhibited normal locomotion and turning rates (Figure S1). We found that animals carrying two independent alleles of gcy-8 (Figure S2), exhibited significant defects in IT behavior. gcy-8(oy44), and to a lesser extent, gcy-8(tm949) mutants grown at either 15°C or 20°C showed defects in isothermal track maintenance as compared to wild-type animals (Figures 2A–C, 3A–C). These mutants also exhibited significantly fewer overall isothermal track numbers at both temperatures, with gcy-8(tm949) mutants exhibiting weaker defects than gcy-8(oy44) animals particularly at 20°C (Figures 2I, 3I). The tracking defects of gcy-8(oy44) mutants were partially rescued upon expression of low copy numbers of a cosmid containing wild-type gcy-8 genomic sequences in one of two transgenic lines examined (Figure 2D, 2I, 3D, 3I). gcy-8(oy44)/gcy-8(tm949) heterozygous animals also exhibited significant IT defects (data not shown).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

rGCs regulate IT behavior at Tc=15°C.

A–H) Scatter plots and histograms of numbers and lengths of isothermal tracks as described in the legend to Figure 1 exhibited by animals of the indicated genotypes grown at Tc=15°C. Data in (A) are from Figure 1D. Wild-type gcy-8 genomic sequences present on the C49H3.1 cosmid were coinjected together with bacterial DNA in a complex array to generate two independent lines [41], and the responses of transgenic animals from one line is shown in (D). 10 independent assays (n=17 animals each) were conducted for each genotype. See also Figures S1 and S2.

I) Average isothermal track numbers exhibited by animals of the indicated genotypes on a 0.9°C/cm gradient. * indicates values that are different from that of corresponding wildtype animals at p < 0.05 using one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s posthoc test. ¶ indicates values that are different from those of gcy-8(oy44) mutants at p<0.05. Error bars are the SEM. Shown is the average of pooled results from 10 independent assays (n=17 animals each) per genotype.

J) Box-and-whisker plots of the temperature range on a linear thermal gradient in which isothermal tracks are exhibited. For this quantification, only mutants exhibiting track numbers similar to or greater than those exhibited by AFD-ablated animals were included. Boxes indicate the 25th (right boundary), 50th (median indicated by a red line), and 75th percentiles (left boundary). Whiskers show the minimum and maximum temperatures. Outliers are indicated by + symbols. * indicates distributions that are different from those of wild-type animals at p<0.05 using the Kolmorogov-Smirnov test. n = 170 animals for each genotype; 10 independent assays each.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

rGCs regulate IT behavior at Tc=20°C.

A–H) Scatter plots and histograms of numbers and lengths of isothermal tracks as described in the legend to Figure 1 exhibited by animals of the indicated genotypes grown at Tc=20°C. Data in (A) are from Figure 1D.

I) Average isothermal track numbers exhibited by animals of the indicated genotypes on a 0.9°C/cm gradient. * indicates values that are different from that of corresponding wild-type animals at p < 0.05 using one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s posthoc test. ¶ indicates values that are different from those of gcy-8(oy44) mutants at p<0.05. Error bars are the SEM. Shown is the average of pooled results from 10 independent assays (n=17 animals each) per genotype.

J) Box-and-whisker plots of the temperature range on a linear thermal gradient in which isothermal tracks are exhibited as described in the legend to Figure 2. ** indicates distributions that are different from those of wild-type animals at p<0.0001 using the Kolmorogov-Smirnov test. n = 170 animals for each genotype; 10 independent assays each.

In contrast, gcy-18 mutants exhibited similar isothermal track numbers and lengths as wild-type animals when grown at either 15°C or 20°C (Figures 2E, 2I, 3E, 3I). gcy-23 mutants grown at 15°C but not at 20°C initiated a significantly larger number of isothermal tracks on a thermal gradient (Figures 2F, 2I, 3F, 3I), and also exhibited longer tracks (Figure 2F). However, the distribution of tracks exhibited by both gcy-18 and gcy-23 mutants on the gradient was distinct from that of wild-type animals (discussed further below). The phenotypes of gcy-23 gcy-18 double mutant animals resembled those of gcy-18 mutants alone at both examined temperatures (Figures 2G, 2I, 3G, 3I), whereas gcy-23 gcy-8 gcy-18 triple mutant animals exhibited strong defects in IT behavior at both temperatures resulting from defects in both initiation and maintenance of isothermal tracks (Figures 2H, 2I, 3H, 3I). These results indicate that GCY-8 regulates the ability of the AFD neurons to execute IT behavior.

GCY-18 and GCY-23 rGCs regulate the temperature range of tracking

The temperature range in which animals track isotherms reflects the animals’ memory of Tc [6, 7, 10]. Mutants that are able to respond to oscillating temperature stimuli and track isotherms may nevertheless do so in a different temperature range if their Tc memory is distinct from that of wild-type animals. Since the distribution of isothermal tracks exhibited by gcy-18 and gcy-23 mutants appeared to be different from that of wild-type animals, we quantified the temperature range in which these gcy mutants exhibited significant IT ability. We found that the distribution range of isothermal tracks in gcy-18 mutants was shifted towards colder temperatures at both Tc=15°C and Tc=20°C, with the shift being larger at Tc=20°C (Figures 2J, 3J). However, while the distribution of isothermal tracks in gcy-23 mutants was also shifted toward colder temperatures at Tc=20°C (Figure 3J), the range was shifted to warmer temperatures at Tc=15°C (Figure 2J). The range in gcy-23 gcy-18 double mutants was not significantly different from that of gcy-18 single mutants at Tc=15°C (Figure 2J), but showed an additive effect at Tc=20°C (Figure 3J). These results imply that while GCY-18 and GCY-23 are not essential for the execution of IT behavior, these rGCs play important roles in setting Tc memory.

Mutations in gcy-8 affect the ability of the AFD neurons to respond to oscillating thermal stimuli

IT behavior requires that animals be able to sense oscillating temperature stimuli around a reference temperature; the amplitude and frequency of the oscillating stimulus are dependent on the steepness of the gradient and the speed of the animals’ sinusoidal movement [8, 9, 19]. The thermosensory responses of the AFD neurons have previously been shown to be bidirectional and adaptive [12, 14, 15], allowing animals to respond to the oscillatory temperature changes that the animal experiences while navigating a linear thermal gradient. We hypothesized that the failure of gcy-8 mutants to track isotherms on steep gradients could arise from defects in the ability of the AFD neurons to respond to these rapidly oscillating temperature changes. To address this possibility we expressed the genetically encoded ratiometric Ca2+ sensor YC3.60 cameleon [20, 21] in the AFD neurons under the gcy-8 promoter, and examined intracellular Ca2+ dynamics in response to sinusoidal variations in temperature.

We examined Ca2+ dynamics in response to oscillatory stimuli of 0.04 Hz frequency and 0.2°C amplitude centered around ~16.1°C and ~18.6°C for animals grown at 15°C and 20°C, respectively (Figure 4A). These stimuli correspond to temporal temperature variations of approximately 0.008°C/sec, which is within the range of sensitivity of temporal sensory processing required for isothermal tracking [8]. The reference mean temperatures were chosen since they were above the corresponding T*AFD, and within the temperature range at which IT behavior is exhibited. Most, if not all examined wild-type AFD neurons (90–100%; n=10 each) responded robustly to this stimulus at both temperatures, and exhibited intracellular Ca2+ dynamics that were phase-locked onto the provided stimulus (Figure 4B, Table 1; Figure S3A). Since the ability of the AFD neurons to track oscillatory thermal stimuli is likely associated with their ability to direct IT behavior [12] we elected to quantify the number of AFD neurons exhibiting oscillatory responses in mutants regardless of response amplitude. In contrast to wild-type animals, only 10–20% (n=10 each) of the examined AFD neurons in gcy-8(oy44) and gcy-8(tm949) animals responded to the stimulus in animals grown at 15°C. Only 20% of the AFD neurons in gcy-8 mutants also responded to oscillating stimuli of a larger amplitude of 0.5°C with a similar stimulus frequency (Figure S3B; Table 1). Whereas 50% of the AFD neurons in gcy-8(oy44) mutant animals responded when grown at 20°C, all AFD neurons of gcy-8(tm949) mutant animals responded at 20°C (Figures 4C, 4D, Table 1) consistent with weaker isothermal tracking behavioral defects exhibited by gcy-8(tm949) mutants at this temperature (Figure 3). We verified that the observed defects were due to mutations in gcy-8 by confirming that the defects in AFD Ca2+ dynamics in gcy-8(tm949) at Tc=15°C mutants could be rescued upon expression of wild-type gcy-8 sequences (Figure 4E).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Intracellular Ca2+ dynamics in the AFD neurons in response to oscillating thermal stimuli.

A) Representative oscillatory temperature stimuli used at each Tc.

B–H) Changes in average intracellular Ca2+ dynamics in cameleon YC3.60-expressing AFD neurons of animals of the indicated genotypes grown at Tc=15°C (left) or Tc=20°C (right). Sinusoidal stimuli had a frequency of 0.04 Hz and amplitudes of 0.2°C centered around 16.1°C (for Tc=15°C) or 18.6°C (Tc=20°C). Also see Figure S3B. In each panel, the average percentage change in phase-locked Ca2+ dynamics is shown in dark blue (ΔR = (R-R0)/R0, where R is the fluorescence emission ratio and R0 is the baseline). In red is shown the average percentage change in fluorescence ratio in non-responding AFD neurons. Averages of the responses that initiated later or showed phase alterations are indicated in cyan. The number of AFD neurons in each category (phase-locked responses, delayed responses or responses with altered phase, no responses) are indicated at the top left of each panel in the corresponding colors. Grayed out bands indicate ±1 SEMs of the response. Statistical significances of proportions are indicated in Table 1. Example responses of individual AFD neurons in wild-type animals are shown in Figure S3A.

Table 1.

Responses of AFD neurons in gcy mutants to oscillating temperature stimuli.

Stimulus
frequency
(Hz)
Stimulus
amplitude
(°C)
Stimulus
range
(°C)
Tc Strain % AFD neurons
exhibiting
phase-locked
responses
% AFD
neurons
respondinga
P valuesb
wild-type 100 100
gcy-8(oy44) 20 20 <0.0001c
0.04 0.2 16.0–16.2 15°C gcy-8(tm949) 10 10 <0.0001c
gcy-8(tm949);
Ex[C49H3.1]
80 90
gcy-18 100 100
gcy-23 100 100
gcy-23 gcy-18 60 90

wild-type 90 90
gcy-8(oy44) 50 50 =0.05
0.04 0.2 18.5–18.7 20°C gcy-8(tm949) 100 100
gcy-18 90 90
gcy-23 70 100
gcy-23 gcy-18 60 80

wild-type 100 100
16.0–16.5 gcy-8(oy44) 20 20 <0.0001c
0.04 0.5 15°C gcy-18 90 90
gcy-23 80 80
a

Includes neurons that exhibit both phase-locked responses as well as responses that are delayed or that are not phase-locked to the stimulus.

b

Compared to the percentage of responding AFD neurons in wild-type animals. Only p values that are significantly different at p<0.05 are indicated. p values were determined using a χ2 test of independence.

c

Compared to wild-type values under the same conditions.

n=10 neurons (1 neuron/animal) for all conditions.

Both gcy-18 and gcy-23 mutants retained the ability to respond to the oscillating stimuli with 0.2°C amplitude at either Tc examined (Figures 4F, 4G, Table 1) consistent with their ability to track isotherms when grown at these temperatures. We noted that a subset of the neurons in gcy-23 mutants appeared to initiate responses later for reasons that are presently unclear (Figure 4G, Table 1). The majority of AFD neurons in gcy-23 gcy-18 mutants also exhibited Ca2+ responses, with a small subset exhibiting delays in response initiation (Figure 4H, Table 1). Together, these results indicate that mutations in gcy-8, but not in gcy-18 and gcy-23, affect the ability of the AFD neurons to respond to oscillating temperature stimuli centered around a mean temperature.

cGMP levels regulate setting of the cultivation temperature memory

As indicated above, while gcy-18 and gcy-23 mutants retained the ability to track isotherms, they did so in a distinct temperature range, suggesting that their Tc memory was altered. To determine whether altered Tc memory correlated with changes in their T*AFD, we provided animals with thermal oscillations superimposed on warming ramps and quantified the average temperature at which intracellular Ca2+ transients are first observed (Figures 1B, 1C). Wild-type AFD neurons showed onset of Ca2+ changes at an average of 13.8°C or 18°C in animals grown at 15°C or 20°C, respectively (Figures 5A, 5B, Figure S4) [10, 12, 13]. Consistent with a larger downward shift in Tc memory of gcy-18 mutants grown at 20°C, the T*AFD in their AFD neurons was also significantly lower, although no significant changes were observed at Tc=15°C (Figures 5A, 5B). However, T*AFD of gcy-23 mutants was not altered at either temperature (Figures 5A, 5B) suggesting that the altered Tc in these animals may reflect changes in the threshold of AFD synaptic output but not in its sensory response [10]. gcy-23 gcy-18 double mutants exhibited T*AFD that was significantly lower than that exhibited by gcy-18 or gcy-23 mutants alone at Tc=20°C, reflecting the markedly lower Tc memory at this temperature as measured behaviorally (Figure 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

cGMP signaling sets the lower and upper bounds of the temperature range in which AFD neurons respond to oscillating stimuli.

A–B) Average temperatures at which AFD neurons in animals grown at 15°C (A) or 20°C (B) first exhibit changes in intracellular Ca2+ levels in response to an warming oscillating temperature ramp (see Figure S4 for representative temperature stimuli and response). Wild-type animals were grown overnight in the presence of 5mM 8-Br-cGMP and T*AFD was quantified in the absence of added analog. n= 9–10 neurons each. * indicates values that are different from that of wild-type animals via one way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD posthoc test at p<0.05. # indicates values of gcy-18 or gcy-23 mutants that are different from that of the gcy-23 gcy-18 double mutant at p<0.05.

C–E) Responses of animals of the indicated genotypes cultivated at 15°C in the absence or presence of 5 mM 8-Br-cGMP to oscillating temperature stimuli centered around ~13.9°C (C), 14.5°C (D) or 18.6°C (E). Phase-locked responses are shown in dark blue, no responses in red, and responses with delayed or altered phases in cyan. Numbers in panel in the corresponding colors indicate the number of neurons in each category. Statistical significances of proportions are shown in Table 2.

Although defects in tracking behavior precluded accurate measurements of Tc memory via behavioral assays in gcy-8 mutants, the AFD neurons in these animals responded robustly to oscillating stimuli superimposed on an upward linear ramp (Figure S4) allowing quantification of T*AFD. Interestingly, T*AFD of gcy-8 mutants was also lower than wild-type T*AFD in animals grown at either temperature (Figures 5A, 5B), indicating that mutations in AFD-expressed rGC genes regulate the range of IT behavior in part via regulation of T*AFD.

Since mutations in gcy genes are expected to alter intracellular cGMP levels, we next quantified T*AFD in wild-type animals grown in the presence of the non-hydrolyzable cGMP analog 8-Br-cGMP. Addition of this analog to the cultivation plates raised T*AFD (Figure 5A). We could not measure their Tc memory behaviorally due to general deficits in locomotory behavior in the presence of this analog (data not shown). Previous observations have also suggested that increased levels of cGMP may shift Tc memory towards higher temperatures [16]. Together, these observations strongly suggest that alterations in intracellular cGMP signaling via mutations in rGC genes or by the addition of cGMP analogs alter Tc memory at least in part via altering the threshold of AFD responsiveness.

cGMP levels set the upper bound of the response range of the AFD neurons to oscillating temperature stimuli

The lower bound of the temperature range in which animals exhibit IT behavior is partly set by T*AFD [12, 13], which in turn appears to be regulated by intracellular cGMP signaling. However, how the upper bound is set is unclear. It is possible that the AFD neurons are able to respond to oscillating temperature stimuli only within the defined temperature range in which IT behavior is exhibited, although this possibility has not been tested experimentally. We hypothesized that the upper bound of the range in which IT behavior is exhibited at a given Tc is also set by intracellular cGMP signaling, thereby defining an operating range of the AFD neurons to this stimulus.

To test this notion, we examined the Ca2+ responses of wild-type AFD neurons to an oscillating stimulus of 0.04 Hz frequency and 0.2°C amplitude centered around ~13.9°C, ~14.5°C and ~18.6°C for animals grown at 15°C and compared these responses to their responses at 16°C (Figures 5C–E, Table 2). Only 20–30% of wild-type AFD neurons exhibited responses at either the low or the high temperature extremes, compared to a 100% response rate at 14.5°C or 16°C (Figures 5C–E, compare with Figure 4B, Table 2), providing a first indication of a defined operating response range of the AFD neurons to this stimulus. The T*AFD of gcy-8 mutants is lower than that of wild-type; we thus considered the possibility that the operating range of gcy-8 mutants may be shifted towards lower temperatures. However, gcy-8(oy44) mutants continued to exhibit significant defects in response to an oscillating stimulus centered around 13.9°C (Figure 5C). Since addition of 8-Br-cGMP raised T*AFD (Figure 5A), we next determined whether the upper bound of the response was also shifted concomitantly. We found that growth of wild-type animals in the presence of 8-Br-cGMP resulted in a more robust response at the higher temperature with 80% of neurons responding albeit with alterations in phase (Figure 5E, Table 2). These results imply that intracellular cGMP signaling sets both the upper and lower bound of responsiveness to oscillating stimuli, thereby defining the temperature range for IT behavior.

Table 2.

cGMP signaling modulates the response range of the AFD neurons.

Stimulus
frequency
(Hz)
Stimulus
amplitude
(°C)
Stimulus
range
(°C)
Tc Strain % AFD neurons
exhibiting
phase-locked
responses
% AFD
neurons
respondinga
P valuesb
0.04 0.2 13.8–14.0 15°C wild-type 0 20 <0.0001c

0.04 0.2 14.4–14.6°C 15°C wild-type 80 100

0.04 0.2 16.0–16.2 15°C wild-type 100 100

wild-type 0 30 <0.005c
0.04 0.2 18.5–18.7 15°C
wild-type 20 80 <0.05d
5mM 8-
Br cGMP
a

Includes all responding neurons.

b

p values were determined using a χ2 test of independence. Only p values that are significantly different at p<0.05 are indicated.

c

Compared to the percentage of responding AFD neurons in wild-type animals exposed to the same stimulus at 16.0–16.2°C and Tc=15°C.

d

Compared to the percentage of responding AFD neurons in wild-type animals exposed to the same stimulus at 18.5–18.7°C in the absence of exposure to 8-Br-cGMP.

n=10 neurons (1 neuron/animal) for all conditions.

DISCUSSION

We have shown that mutations in individual rGC genes or growth in the presence of a cGMP analog regulate the ability of the AFD neurons to respond to oscillating temperature stimuli and modulate the temperature range in which the AFD neurons are able to respond to these stimuli. Our results imply that differential responses of the AFD neurons in different temperature zones contribute to the generation of distinct thermosensory navigation behaviors on a linear thermal gradient.

Individual rGC genes regulate different aspects of AFD neuron function

Loss-of-function mutations in gcy-8 result in marked IT behavioral defects due to defects in both isothermal track initiation and maintenance. Correspondingly, the AFD neurons of gcy-8 mutants exhibit defects in their ability to respond to oscillating temperature stimuli centered around Tc. In contrast, gcy-18 and gcy-23 mutants retain the ability to track isotherms, and the AFD neurons in these mutants continue to respond to these oscillating stimuli. However, gcy-18 and gcy-23 mutants track isotherms in distinct temperature zones, and both gcy-18 and gcy-8 mutants exhibit altered T*AFD. Thus, while all three rGC genes play roles in regulating the temperature range in which IT behavior can be exhibited, only gcy-8 regulates the ability of the AFD neurons to execute IT behavior.

Genes encoding these three rGCs are linked on LG IV and share extensive sequence homology [16]. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that these proteins belong to a larger nematode-specific clade and are likely to have arisen via gene duplication [22]. However, their functions in the AFD neurons appear to have diverged. GCY-18 and GCY-23 do not have completely redundant functions, since the majority of phenotypes of the gcy-23 gcy-18 double mutants are not significantly stronger than those of gcy-18 single mutants alone. Mutations in gcy-23 affect the temperature range of IT behavior without affecting T*AFD, suggesting that the changes in cGMP signaling in gcy-23 mutants may be sufficient to alter the threshold of AFD synaptic output but not that of sensory responses. It is possible that GCY-18 and GCY-23 are required under other conditions that require AFD function [16], and contribute to other phenotypes including regulation of lifespan [23, 24] and systemic heat shock responses [25]. The AFD neurons have been reported to express additional rGCs [16, 18] which may further contribute to AFD functional complexity. Similar complexity in rGC functions has been reported in the ASE chemosensory neurons in C. elegans which express >10 rGC genes [18, 26].

cGMP signaling likely sets the lower and upper bound of AFD response range

Our results indicate that the AFD neurons are able to respond to oscillating temperature stimuli only within a narrow temperature zone relative to T*AFD. The lower and upper bounds of this response range are altered in rGC mutants and upon growth in the presence of 8-Br-cGMP, suggesting that reduction or increase in cGMP signaling results in a lowering or raising of T*AFD, respectively, with corresponding shifts in the upper bounds.

A decrease or increase in intracellular cGMP signaling requires a lower or higher temperature, respectively, to initiate AFD neuronal activity at a given Tc. A simple possibility is that the enzymatic activity of the rGCs themselves is temperature-dependent, and that the TAX-2/4 CNG channels adapt to prevailing cGMP signaling at a given Tc. Indeed, C. elegans guanylyl cyclases have been reported to exhibit temperature-dependent activity [17, 27]. Thus, in AFD neurons with decreased cGMP signaling due to loss-of-function mutations in one or more rGCs, the CNG channels may have adapted to lower cGMP concentrations at Tc. Hence, the increase in intracellular cGMP upon a small rise in temperature may be sufficient to open the channels resulting in a lower T*AFD than in wild-type AFD neurons. Conversely, if the CNG channels are adapted to high cGMP levels at Tc, higher temperatures may be needed to generate sufficient cGMP in order to enable channel opening, leading to a higher T*AFD. CNG channel opening and sensitivity are known to be regulated by diverse mechanisms including phosphorylation, binding of Ca2+/calmodulin, and phospholipids [28–35]. One or more of these mechanisms may contribute to the adaptation of the channels at Tc. Additional mechanisms such as changes in expression of the rGCs may also play a role in setting the T*AFD [36].

Why do the AFD neurons respond to oscillating stimuli only at temperatures close to T*AFD? One possibility is that in this range, the concentration of cGMP and the number of open channels are optimal to permit a high degree of sensitivity to rapid temperature changes. At higher temperatures, more channels may be open decreasing the gain, which may in turn set the upper bound by decreasing neuronal sensitivity. Loss of GCY-8 affects the ability of the AFD neurons to respond to rapid temperature changes around Tc, suggesting that GCY-8, but not GCY-18 or GCY-23, plays an important role in rapid temperature-dependent cGMP production around Tc. However, gcy-8 mutants respond normally to upward oscillating ramps, perhaps due to involvement of other rGCs when temperatures begin to rise. It is important to note, however, that current experiments are unable to distinguish between temperature-dependent regulation of rGCs vs phosphodiesterases.

Regardless of the exact mechanism, adaptation to Tc and modulation of cGMP signaling allows the AFD neurons to both maintain a high degree of sensitivity in the required temperature range while retaining the ability to respond to a broad temperature range. This is reminiscent of mechanisms of peripheral and central gain control in sensory systems such as in vision and audition that permit both sensitivity and accuracy in sensory responses across a wide dynamic range [37, 38].

Different thermosensory neuron response properties evoke specific behaviors in defined thermal zones

We and others previously showed that the AWC polymodal sensory neurons exhibit different responses at temperatures near, above or below Tc [39, 40]. We now find that the AFD neurons are also differentially responsive to oscillating temperature stimuli in the temperature range at which IT behavior is exhibited. Thus, the temperature range-specific responses of the AFD neurons and AWC neurons permit IT behavior in a defined temperature zone. Integration of differential responses from multiple sensory neurons under specific conditions may increase the robustness and precision of the thermosensory behavioral response.

Thermotaxis in C. elegans is a remarkably complex experience-dependent behavior. Identification and characterization of the molecular mechanisms underlying sensory neuron response properties to distinct features of thermal stimuli may now permit analyses of how these patterns are integrated and translated through the circuit into precise changes in locomotor output.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

IT behavioral assays and Ca2+ imaging experiments were performed essentially as previously described [40]. Further experimental details and information on strains used and statistical analyses are provided in Supplemental Experimental Procedures.

Supplementary Material

01

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Rinho Kim, Kyuhyung Kim, Sarah Hall and Ronen Kopito for experimental assistance, Eric Allard for advice on statistical analyses, David Biron and Miriam Goodman for insights and advice, and Miriam Goodman for sharing unpublished data and reagents. We thank Cori Bargmann, Chris Fang-Yen, Chris Gabel, Miriam Goodman and members of the Sengupta lab for comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by the NIH (F31 NS060584 to S.W., R01 GM081639 to P.S., core grant P30 NS45713 to the Brandeis Biology Department) and the NSF (IGERT training grant DGE-0549390 to M.B.).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Schepers RJ, Ringkamp M. Thermoreceptors and thermosensitive afferents. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2009;33:205–212. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dunn FA, Rieke F. The impact of photoreceptor noise on retinal gain controls. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006;16:363–370. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shapley R. Retinal physiology: adapting to the changing scene. Curr. Biol. 1997;7:R421–R423. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00207-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Grothe B, Klump GM. Temporal processing in sensory systems. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2000;10:467–473. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00115-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maler L. Neural strategies for optimal processing of sensory signals. Prog. Brain Res. 2007;165:135–154. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65009-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hedgecock EM, Russell RL. Normal and mutant thermotaxis in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1975;72:4061–4065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.10.4061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mori I, Ohshima Y. Neural regulation of thermotaxis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1995;376:344–348. doi: 10.1038/376344a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Luo L, Clark DA, Biron D, Mahadevan L, Samuel AD. Sensorimotor control during isothermal tracking in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Exp. Biol. 2006;209:4652–4662. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ryu WS, Samuel AD. Thermotaxis in Caenorhabditis elegans analyzed by measuring responses to defined thermal stimuli. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:5727–5733. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-13-05727.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Biron D, Shibuya M, Gabel C, Wasserman SM, Clark DA, Brown A, Sengupta P, Samuel AD. A diacylglycerol kinase modulates long-term thermotactic behavioral plasticity in C. elegans. Nat. Neurosci. 2006;9:1499–1505. doi: 10.1038/nn1796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chung SH, Clark DA, Gabel CV, Mazur E, Samuel AD. The role of the AFD neuron in C. elegans thermotaxis analyzed using femtosecond laser ablation. BMC Neurosci. 2006;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Clark DA, Biron D, Sengupta P, Samuel ADT. The AFD sensory neurons encode multiple functions underlying thermotactic behavior in C. elegans. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:7444–7451. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1137-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kimura KD, Miyawaki A, Matsumoto K, Mori I. The C. elegans thermosensory neuron AFD responds to warming. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:1291–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clark DA, Gabel CV, Gabel H, Samuel AD. Temporal activity patterns in thermosensory neurons of freely moving Caenorhabditis elegans encode spatial thermal gradients. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:6083–6090. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1032-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ramot D, MacInnis BL, Goodman MB. Bidirectional temperature-sensing by a single thermosensory neuron in C. elegans. Nat. Neurosci. 2008;11:908–915. doi: 10.1038/nn.2157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Inada H, Ito H, Satterlee J, Sengupta P, Matsumoto K, Mori I. Identification of guanylyl cyclases that function in thermosensory neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2006;172:2239–2252. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.050013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yu S, Avery L, Baude E, Garbers DA. Guanylyl cyclase expression in specific sensory neurons: A new family of chemosensory receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:3384–3387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ortiz CO, Etchberger JF, Posy SL, Frokjaer-Jensen C, Lockery S, Honig B, Hobert O. Searching for neuronal left/right asymmetry: genomewide analysis of nematode receptor-type guanylyl cyclases. Genetics. 2006;173:131–149. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.055749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stephens GJ, Johnson-Kerner B, Bialek W, Ryu WS. Dimensionality and dynamics in the behavior of C. elegans. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008;4 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000028. e1000028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nakai J, Ohkura M, Imoto K. A high signal-to-noise Ca(2+) probe composed of a single green fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001;19:137–141. doi: 10.1038/84397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nagai T, Yamada S, Tominaga T, Ichikawa M, Miyawaki A. Expanded dynamic range of fluorescent indicators for Ca(2+) by circularly permuted yellow fluorescent proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:10554–10559. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400417101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fitzpatrick DA, O'Halloran DM, Burnell AM. Multiple lineage specific expansions within the guanylyl cyclase gene family. BMC Evol. Biol. 2006;6:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Murphy CT, McCarroll SA, Bargmann CI, Fraser A, Kamath RS, Ahringer J, Li H, Kenyon C. Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2003;424:277–283. doi: 10.1038/nature01789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hamilton B, Dong Y, Shindo M, Liu W, Odell I, Ruvkun G, Lee SS. A systematic RNAi screen for longevity genes in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1544–1555. doi: 10.1101/gad.1308205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Prahlad V, Cornelius T, Morimoto RI. Regulation of the cellular heat shock response in Caenorhabditis elegans by thermosensory neurons. Science. 2008;320:811–814. doi: 10.1126/science.1156093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ortiz CO, Faumont S, Takayama J, Ahmed HK, Goldsmith AD, Pocock R, McCormick KE, Kunimoto H, Iino Y, Lockery S, et al. Lateralized gustatory behavior of C. elegans is controlled by specific receptor-type guanylyl cyclases. Curr. Biol. 2009;19:996–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Baude EJ, Arora VK, Yu S, Garbers DL, Wedel BJ. The cloning of a Caenorhabditis elegans guanylyl cyclase and the construction of a ligands-sensitive mammalian/nematode chimeric receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:16035–16039. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.25.16035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Potter LR, Garbers DL. Dephosphorylation of the guanylyl cyclase-A receptor causes desensitization. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:14531–14534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Potter LR, Hunter T. Phosphorylation of the kinase homology domain is essential for activation of the A-type natriuretic peptide receptor. Mol. Cell Biol. 1998;18:2164–2172. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.4.2164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Trudeau MC, Zagotta WN. Calcium/calmodulin modulation of olfactory and rod cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:18705–18708. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R300001200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chen TY, Yau KW. Direct modulation by Ca(2+)-calmodulin of cyclic nucleotide-activated channel of rat olfactory receptor neurons. Nature. 1994;368:545–548. doi: 10.1038/368545a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Spehr M, Wetzel CH, Hatt H, Ache BW. 3-phosphoinositides modulate cyclic nucleotide signaling in olfactory receptor neurons. Neuron. 2002;33:731–739. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00610-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Womack KB, Gordon SE, He F, Wensel TG, Lu CC, Hilgemann DW. Do phosphatidylinositides modulate vertebrate phototransduction? Neurosci. 2000;20:2792–2799. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-08-02792.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bradley J, Bonigk W, Yau KW, Frings S. Calmodulin permanently associates with rat olfactory CNG channels under native conditions. Nat. Neurosci. 2004;7:705–710. doi: 10.1038/nn1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Krajewski JL, Luetje CW, Kramer RH. Tyrosine phosphorylation of rod cyclic nucleotide-gated channels switches off Ca2+/calmodulin inhibition. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:10100–10106. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-31-10100.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Satterlee JS, Ryu WS, Sengupta P. The CMK-1 CaMKI and the TAX-4 Cyclic nucleotide-gated channel regulate thermosensory neuron gene expression and function in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Robinson BL, McAlpine D. Gain control mechanisms in the auditory pathway. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2009;19:402–407. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shapley R, Enroth-Cugell C. Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls. Progr. Ret. Res. 1984;3:263–346. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kuhara A, Okumura M, Kimata T, Tanizawa Y, Takano R, Kimura KD, Inada H, Matsumoto K, Mori I. Temperature sensing by an olfactory neuron in a circuit controlling behavior of C. elegans. Science. 2008;320:803–807. doi: 10.1126/science.1148922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Biron D, Wasserman SM, Thomas JH, Samuel AD, Sengupta P. An olfactory neuron responds stochastically to temperature and modulates C. elegans thermotactic behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:11002–11007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805004105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kelly WG, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Fire A. Distinct requirements for somatic and germline expression of a generally expressed Caernorhabditis elegans gene. Genetics. 1997;146:227–238. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES