Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2010 Aug 16;107(35):15385–15390. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004981107

Mechanism for pH-dependent gene regulation by amino-terminus-mediated homooligomerization of Bacillus subtilis anti-trp RNA-binding attenuation protein

Joseph R Sachleben a,1, Craig A McElroy a,1, Paul Gollnick b, Mark P Foster a,2
PMCID: PMC2932582  PMID: 20713740

Abstract

Anti-TRAP (AT) is a small zinc-binding protein that regulates tryptophan biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis by binding to tryptophan-bound trp RNA-binding attenuation protein (TRAP), thereby preventing it from binding RNA, and allowing transcription and translation of the trpEDCFBA operon. Crystallographic and sedimentation studies have shown that AT can homooligomerize to form a dodecamer, AT12, composed of a tetramer of trimers, AT3. Structural and biochemical studies suggest that only trimeric AT is active for binding to TRAP. Our chromatographic and spectroscopic data revealed that a large fraction of recombinantly overexpressed AT retains the N-formyl group (fAT), presumably due to incomplete N-formyl-methionine processing by peptide deformylase. Hydrodynamic parameters from NMR relaxation and diffusion measurements showed that fAT is exclusively trimeric (AT3), while (deformylated) AT exhibits slow exchange between both trimeric and dodecameric forms. We examined this equilibrium using NMR spectroscopy and found that oligomerization of active AT3 to form inactive AT12 is linked to protonation of the amino terminus. Global analysis of the pH dependence of the trimer-dodecamer equilibrium revealed a near physiological pKa for the N-terminal amine of AT and yielded a pH-dependent oligomerization equilibrium constant. Estimates of excluded volume effects due to molecular crowding suggest the oligomerization equilibrium may be physiologically important. Because deprotonation favors “active” trimeric AT and protonation favors “inactive” dodecameric AT, our findings illuminate a possible mechanism for sensing and responding to changes in cellular pH.

Keywords: allostery, thermodynamic linkage, n-formyl methionine


In bacilli, the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein (TRAP) is responsible for responding to intracellular levels of tryptophan and regulating transcription (1–4) and translation (5–10) of six tryptophan biosynthetic genes clustered in the trpECDFBA operon (1, 11). Transcription of the gene is controlled by an attenuation mechanism, involving competing terminator and antiterminator RNA structural elements in the 5′ leader region of the mRNA. In the absence of cellular tryptophan, the antiterminator structure is favored, allowing transcription and translation of the operon. When cellular tryptophan levels are high, the amino acid binds to TRAP, which becomes activated for binding to an RNA site that overlaps the antiterminator sequence, favoring formation of the terminator; translation of these genes is regulated by a similar mechanism (1, 6, 9, 10, 12–14). TRAP is a small protein (∼74 amino acids) that assembles into an undecameric (11-mer) ring-shaped structure, with binding sites for tryptophan arranged between neighboring TRAP protomers (15, 16). RNA binds to TRAP by wrapping around the outside of this ring (17).

In Bacillus subtilis (Bsu), the protein anti-TRAP (AT), encoded by the yczA gene, provides further regulation by inhibiting mRNA binding by tryptophan-activated TRAP (13, 18). AT is a zinc-binding protein that shares sequence homology with the zinc-binding domain of the chaperone protein DnaJ (13, 18). Chemical cross-linking and analytical ultracentrifugation studies demonstrated that AT is oligomeric, with both trimeric and dodecameric species present in solution (18–20). Crystallographic studies of Bsu AT revealed a dodecamer (AT12) comprising a tetrameric arrangement of trimers (AT3). Each trimer is constructed around a three-helix bundle involving the C-terminal residues, and four trimers assemble to form the dodecamer through interactions in the zinc-binding and N-terminal regions (21). Notably, neither oligomeric form of AT, trimer or dodecamer, shares symmetry elements with its physiological target: undecameric TRAP.

The Bsu AT crystal structure alone did not permit well-informed hypotheses into the mode of interaction with, and inactivation of, TRAP. Site-directed mutations in TRAP that interfere with RNA binding were found to also interfere with AT binding, suggesting that AT may bind to the RNA-binding surface of TRAP that is stabilized by tryptophan binding (22–25). Alanine scanning studies of AT highlighted residues important for TRAP binding and showed that dodecameric AT was unlikely to be able to bind to TRAP (26). In agreement with these findings, crystallographic studies of 12-mer-forming variants of TRAP in complex with AT showed six AT trimers (AT3) arranged along the outside of the TRAP ring, suggesting that the trimer is the species that binds to TRAP (27). However, in vivo studies of the relative concentrations of AT and TRAP seem to show that TRAP activity can be fully inhibited by AT present at a ratio of two AT3 per TRAP ring (28). Moreover, because TRAP is predominantly undecameric in solution, these observations leave unresolved critical questions about the stoichiometry and thermodynamics of the TRAP-AT interaction. We have been pursuing these questions using NMR spectroscopy and other solution methods.

We have found that, on the NMR chemical shift time scale, AT exhibits a slow equilibrium between trimeric and dodecameric forms. Oligomerization of four trimers (AT3) into a dodecameric state (AT12) is thermodynamically linked (29) to formation of an ion pair that involves the protonated N terminus and a conserved aspartate carboxylate (21, 30). Because these forms can be distinguished spectroscopically, we were able to determine the equilibrium constants for deprotonation of the N-terminal amine of AT, and the linked trimer-dodecamer equilibrium. Chromatographic, NMR, and mass spectrometric data revealed that when overexpressed in minimal media, a large fraction of AT molecules retain the N-formyl group, and that formyl-AT (fAT) is exclusively trimeric, consistent with the involvement of a protonated N terminus in forming the dodecamer-stabilizing ion pair. Finally, we examined the potential physiological role of these processes by considering how excluded volume effects from molecular crowding (31) would alter the behavior of the linked equilibria.

Results

Recombinantly Expressed AT Is Produced in Both N-Formyl and Deformylated Forms.

High yields of recombinant U-[15N]-AT were obtained from E. coli cells transformed with a codon-optimized synthetic Bsu AT gene cloned into the pET24a plasmid and grown in defined minimal media (23). Purification of the protein under native conditions by ion exchange chromatography resulted in samples that were homogeneous based on SDS-PAGE with Coomassie staining. However, these initial samples of AT yielded 1H-15N heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) spectra that exhibited doubling of several of the amide resonances, suggesting either that two forms of AT were present or that some of the residues were experiencing slow conformational exchange between two distinct states. Further purification of chemically denatured AT by reversed phase or anion-exchange chromatography revealed two species whose mobilities and electrospray mass spectra (Fig. S1) were consistent with AT (5,648.0 Da observed, 5,649.5 Da expected; ProtParam, ExPASy), and N-formyl-AT (28 Da greater; 5,676.0 Da observed). This observation is consistent with incomplete removal of the formyl group from the N-formyl-methione used to initiate bacterial protein translation.

The chemical identity of N-formyl-AT was further confirmed through analysis of its heteronuclear NMR spectra. While assigning backbone resonances for this protein we found signals for an amide in the HNCA and HNCACB spectra that correlated only to Cα and Cβ shifts matching those assigned to Met1. In the HNCO spectrum, this amide proton correlated to two resonances in the carbon dimension centered at 166.6 ppm and separated by 199 Hz (Fig. 1A). In an HNCO spectrum, usually a single peak is observed correlating each amide 1H (ω3) to its directly attached 15N (ω2) and the attached 13C (ω1) of the carbonyl group in peptide bonds (32). However, for the formyl-methionine amide, the aldehyde proton will lead to splitting of the carbonyl resonance because 1H decoupling is not generally applied during the 13C evolution period. The magnitude of the observed splitting is consistent with published values for one-bond couplings in formamide groups (33, 34). This amide also exhibits NOEs (Fig. 1B) to the Hα of Met1 and a resonance at 8.11 ppm that matches a unique resonance in the 13C HSQC spectrum with a 13C shift of 166.5 ppm (Fig. S2), consistent with 1H and 13C shifts for trans-formyl-methionine of 8.12 ppm and 166.3 ppm (Human Metabolome Database, http://www.hmdb.ca/, HMDB01015). Thus, our recombinant AT is produced as a mixture of mature AT and unprocessed fAT bearing an N-formyl-Met; further N-terminal processing of AT in vivo by methionine aminopeptidase was not observed.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

NMR evidence for N-formyl-AT. (A) 1H-13C plane of the 3D HNCO spectrum of fAT at an 15N frequency of 128 ppm. The doublet at 167 ppm in the 13C dimension could be assigned to the backbone amide of Met1. The signal is split by the 199-Hz J coupling to the aldehydic proton because 1H decoupling is not generally performed during the 13C evolution period of the HNCO sequence. The asterisk indicates resonances aliased in the 15N dimension. (B) Corresponding plane of the 15N-edited NOE spectrum of fAT. The spectrum shows a cross-peak from the Met1 amide proton to the aldehydic proton at 8.11 ppm and to the α proton at 4.52 ppm.

Effect of the N-formyl Group on Oligomerization.

It seemed unlikely that the mere presence of the N-terminal formyl group could account for the large number and magnitude of shift differences observed in the 1H-15N spectra of the two species of AT (Fig. 2A). Backbone resonance assignments were obtained from triple resonance NMR spectra recorded for highly concentrated samples of both species of AT (∼8 mM AT and 3 mM fAT protomer concentrations) (23), and the chemical shift differences were mapped to the structure of the crystallographically observed AT dodecamer (Fig. 2B). Notably, the largest shift differences between AT and fAT map to the interface between trimers in the dodecamer. Because chemical shifts are particularly sensitive probes of intermolecular interactions (35), these data suggested that the oligomeric states of the AT species differed.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Comparison of NMR spectra from trimeric fAT and dodecameric AT. (A) Overlay of the 15N-1H correlation spectra of AT (black, 8.6-mM protomer) and fAT (red, 3.1-mM protomer); cartoon diagrams of AT3 and AT12 are colored to match the spectral overlay. (B) Chemical shift perturbations mapped to a trimer in the context of the other three trimers in the dodecamer (light blue). Shift changes are mapped by a linear color ramp from gray to red for least to largest perturbation. Notably, chemical shift perturbations are concentrated in the trimer-trimer interfaces.

To determine the oligomeric states of these chemically distinct forms of AT, we carried out 15N relaxation measurements to obtain their overall rotational correlation times (32). NMR spectra were recorded at 55 °C with 3.1 mM fAT and 8.6 mM AT (protomer concentrations). Analysis of the 15N relaxation data (Fig. 3) revealed a mean T1 for AT of 1.91 ± 0.25 s, whereas that in fAT is 0.631 ± 0.091 s. The mean 15N T2 of AT is 31.9 ± 4.5 ms, whereas that of fAT is 85 ± 13 ms. Fitting these data to an isotropic tumbling model (32) yielded overall rotational correlation times of 25.2 ± 2.8 ns for AT and 8.2 ± 1.0 ns for fAT. Hydrodynamic calculations (36) using coordinates derived from the AT12 crystal structure (21) predicted an isotropic rotational correlation time at 55 °C of τm = 28.7 ns for AT12, and an axially symmetric rotational diffusion tensor for AT3 with correlations times of Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Hydrodynamic properties were also measured in one-dimensional stimulated echo gradient diffusion NMR experiments (37), which yielded diffusion coefficients of Inline graphic and Inline graphic for AT and fAT, respectively (Fig. S3). These values compare favorably with values calculated (36) from the coordinates of AT12 and AT3, 5.66 × 10-7 cm2/s and 9.26 × 10-7 cm2/s, respectively. The agreement between these experimental and calculated values indicate that under the experimental conditions deformylated AT forms dodecamers, whereas fAT is trimeric.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Rotational correlation times of fAT and AT from 15N relaxation rates. (A) Histogram of measured 15N T1 values of AT (red) and fAT (blue). The 15N T1 is significantly longer for AT than for fAT. (B) Histogram of measured 15N T2 values of AT (red) and fAT (blue). The 15N T2 of AT is significantly shorter than that of fAT. (C) Probability distributions of the fit of the measured 15N T1 and T2 values of AT and fAT to an isotropic tumbling model. AT tumbles more slowly than fAT (∼25 ns versus ∼8 ns, respectively).

pH-Dependent Oligomerization of Deformylated AT.

The observation that the N-formyl group prevents formation of AT dodecamers is consistent with the crystallographically observed ion pair involving the amino terminus of each protein chain and the sidechain carboxylate of Asp7 from another trimer in the dodecamer (Fig. 4) (21, 30). The presence of the ion pair predicts the oligomeric state of AT is pH dependent. The effect of pH and concentration on the oligomeric state of AT was examined by recording a series of 2D 1H-15N correlation spectra (Fig. 5) over a range of pH values spanning 6.5 to 8, taking advantage of the differences in the 1H-15N shifts between the spectra between the trimeric and dodecameric forms as indicative of oligomeric state (Fig. 2). Protein concentrations for these experiments varied from 268 μM to 638 μM. At low pH and these concentrations, signals corresponding to both AT3 and AT12 are observed, with the dodecameric state being more highly populated. At higher pH the relative intensity of the AT12 peak decreases, whereas that due to AT3 increases; only signals from AT3 are observed at pH 8 (Fig. 5). No oligomerization was observed for fAT over this pH range, even at higher concentrations (> 2 mM), indicating that the formyl group prevents formation of dodecameric AT. These data show that AT3 and AT12 are in slow exchange on the NMR time scale and that low pH favors oligomerization to the dodecamer.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Intertrimer ion pairs observed in the crystal structure of AT12 (21). (A) Ribbon diagram showing tetrahedral arrangement of AT trimers in the dodecamer (21). Each trimer is shown in a different color; helices are drawn as cylinders; zinc ions are shown as spheres. (B) The crucial ion pair involves the terminal amine of Met1 from one trimer to the side chain carboxylate of Asp7 in another trimer. (C) Schematic showing the ion pairs among the trimers of one face of the tetrahedral dodecamer; color scheme as in A; dashes indicate location of additional structural elements that are omitted for clarity. The N terminus and Asp7 of each chain in AT12 participates in stabilizing ion pairs with complementary chains in two other trimers. These chains are labeled B in the figure and are related by the C3 symmetry of the face of tetrahedral dodecamer. The identity of the B chain changes on each face of the dodecamer so that every chain in each trimer is involved in ion pair formation to chains in two other trimers. Deprotonation of the N-terminal amine or the presence of an N-formyl group disrupts this ion pair preventing the formation of the dodecamer.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

pH dependence of the oligomeric state of (deformylated) AT. (Left) Signals corresponding to AT3 and AT12 from Gly31 in 1H-15N spectra recorded at pH values of 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, and 8.0. (Right) Simulated fractions of AT3 and AT12; the vertical line indicates the approximate concentration at which the spectra were collected. At pH 6.5, the protein is primarily in the AT12 form. As the pH increases, the intensity of the AT12 peak decreases, whereas that of AT3 increases. At pH 8.0, only the AT3 peak is visible in the spectrum. These data allow determination of the coupled equilibrium constants for oligomerization of trimers into dodecamers, log K1 = 15.9 ± 0.6, and for protonation of the N-terminal amine, pka = 7.38 ± 0.09.

We interpreted the pH and concentration dependence of AT3 oligomerization to AT12 by considering the following coupled equilibria in which ka is the microscopic acid dissociation constant of the N-terminal amine:

graphic file with name pnas.1004981107eq13.jpg [1]

[AT3], [Inline graphic], [Inline graphic], and [Inline graphic] are the concentrations of differently protonated states of the trimer, and [AT12] is the concentration of the dodecamer; Ka1, Ka2, and Ka3 are the macroscopic acid dissociation constants of the trimer. The pKa of the N-terminal amine is defined as the microscopic pka = - log(ka). The microscopic equilibrium constants for deprotonation of each N terminus were assumed to be equal and independent. K1 is the association constant for four triprotonated trimers to form dodecamer. Implicit in the model is that only the triprotonated form of AT3 is able to oligomerize; equivalently, protons do not dissociate from AT12. We rationalize this approximation based on structural arguments (once assembled into the dodecamer the close proximity of the N-terminal amine and carboxylate would strongly favor protonation; Fig. 4), relatively weak stability of the oligomer (deprotonating one or more trimers would likely lead to disassembly), and the highly cooperative nature of oligomer assembly (no intermediates are observed, indicating all favorable contacts must be present to stabilize the dodecamer).

This model was used to fit the relative volumes of the AT12 peaks of several amides with dispersed timer and dodecamer frequencies in the 1H-15N correlation spectra (Val10, Ala28, Cys29, Gly31, Gly33, Val34, Ile35, and Thr42; Figs. S2 and S4). The most likely values of the parameters are found to be log K1 = 15.9 ± 0.6 (K1 in units of M-3) and pka = 7.38 ± 0.09 (Fig. S4a). These parameters were found to accurately model the measured fractions of AT12 as a function of pH and concentration (Fig. S4b). These linked equilibrium constants allow the determination of the apparent dissociation constant of the dodecamer, i.e., Inline graphic, the concentration of free AT3 at which half of the protein is trimeric and the other half is oligomerized to AT12. Due to the linked protonation equilibrium, this value is very sensitive to pH: at values below 6, where AT is essentially fully protonated, Inline graphic has an almost constant value of 3 μM, whereas at pH 7, Inline graphic increases to 13 μM, and to 2 mM at pH 8 (Fig. S5). As a consequence of this thermodynamic linkage (29), just as pH alters the effective equilibrium constant for oligomerization, protein concentration affects the protonation state of the protein. As the total protomer concentration increases, protonation is favored and Inline graphic increases.

Discussion

Oligomerization of AT3 to form AT12 is linked to the protonation state of the N-terminal amine. In the crystal structure of Bsu AT, an ion pair is formed between the N-terminal amine of Met1 on one AT trimer and the carboxylate anion of the side chain of Asp7 on another trimer. In fact, the strand that contains both Met1 and Asp7 on a chain of one trimer interacts via ion pairs with two chains of two other trimers, so that every AT chain forms ion pairs with two different trimers (Fig. 4C). Thus, when the N terminus of AT is protonated, 12 ion pairs are formed resulting in a stable dodecamer. Incomplete deformylation of the N terminus prevents formation of these stabilizing ion pairs, thereby preventing tetramerization of trimers.

Equilibrium sedimentation studies at pH 7 revealed the presence of AT3 and AT12 in solution and estimated the equilibrium constant for association to be between 3 × 1013 and 3 × 1014 M-3 (19). The model presented predicts that at pH 7 the effective association constant, Inline graphic, where Φ is the reciprocal of the pH-dependent fraction of free AT3 that is fully protonated, has a value of 1.2 × 1014 M-3 (Fig. S5), consistent with the sedimentation data. It is also interesting to note the conditions that lead to crystal formation of both the AT12 (21, 38) and the AT3-TRAP complex (27) are consistent with the pH-dependent oligomerization reported in this paper. Bsu AT12 was crystallized from a pH 6.5 solution (21) where N-terminal protonation would favor formation of the dodecameric form, whereas the AT3-TRAP complex was crystallized at a pH of 8.5 (27) where trimer dominates.

The present measurements permit a rough analysis of the oligomeric state of AT in bacterial cells. The cytoplasm of growing B. subtilis cells has been reported to have a pH in the range of 7.4–7.8 (39, 40). Estimates of the concentration of AT range from 900 to 3,000 protomers per cell (28, 41). If we assume 1,000 protomers per cell in an approximate cellular volume of 1 μm3 (42), the total concentration of AT protomers in the cell is about 2 μM. Using these values, Eq. 1 suggests that there is less than one dodecamer per cell and is thus not physiologically relevant.

Motivated by the exquisite molecular symmetry inherent in the ion pair-dependent assembly of AT dodecamers (Fig. 4), conservation of the N-Asp spacing in known AT sequences (21, 30), and evolutionary arguments (43), we considered whether the equilibria described here might be sufficiently shifted inside cells to allow physiological formation of AT12. In particular, we examined how molecular crowding in the cellular environment might promote oligomerization through excluded volume effects (31). Crowding effects, while often ignored, can be quite significant, promoting protein folding (44) and protein-DNA interactions (45), for instance. Indeed, by calculating the activity coefficients of AT3 and AT12 using scaled particle theory, together with estimates of cellular excluded volume and average molecular masses (31), we find a near 2 orders of magnitude shift in the equilibrium in favor of dodecamerization; for example, at pH 6.8, assuming 1,000 protomers per cell, the predicted concentration of dodecameric AT is negligible in the absence of crowding but represents almost one-third of the protein in the presence (Fig. S6 and SI Text). This effect can be rationalized by the increased effective concentration of AT due to the presence of excluders and the greater entropic penalty to make four excluder voids into which AT3 can fit versus making a single larger void for AT12. Although the presence of dodecameric AT in bacterial cells has not yet been established experimentally, we take the preceding analysis to suggest that the 4AT3⇄AT12 equilibrium is physiologically accessible and consider the possible functional implications.

The preceding analysis suggests that AT will be dodecameric and unable to inhibit TRAP under conditions of high crowding and low pH. Although bacteria have multiple mechanisms for controlling cellular homeostasis (46), it is interesting to note that extreme shifts in internal pH and molecular crowding occur during sporulation of spore-forming bacilli (40). During spore formation the pH can drop an entire unit, while simultaneously the excluded volume increases dramatically from ∼30% to nearly 70% (47). The cumulative effects of low pH, reduced volume, and high crowding would strongly favor AT12 over AT3. Assuming that the prespore contains 250 AT protomers in a volume of 0.25 μm3 (corresponding to the amount in one-fourth of the cell volume), the fraction of AT as AT12 increases from 0.31 to 1.00 as the excluded volume increases from 30% to 70%. Thus, if the ability to package AT12 in the bacterial spore creates a survival advantage, the sequence conservation of the trimer-interacting regions of AT might also be explained. Although AT is not known to be involved in sporulation, this extreme example illustrates the range of physiological conditions the protein might be exposed to in a normal physiological context that would alter its oligomeric state.

We further considered whether the pH dependence of AT oligomerization might have a regulatory role. Because structural and biochemical data indicate that only trimeric AT can bind and inhibit TRAP (21, 26, 27), a cellular shift to low pH would favor AT12 formation and result in decreased gene expression. The coincidence of the internal pH of growing B. subtilis cells with our measured pKa for deprotonation of the amino terminus of AT3 (pH 7.4) indicates that changes in cellular pH could alter the trimer-dodecamer equilibrium and thereby alter gene expression profiles. Although there is currently no evidence for pH-dependent expression of genes regulated by TRAP or AT, it is notable that the Bsu AT gene, yczA, is immediately upstream of a gene, ycbK, encoding putative cation transporter (conserved domain TIGR00950) (13, 18); bacterial cation transporters are implicated in pH homeostasis by balancing cellular cation and proton concentrations (46). Moreover, while transcriptome analysis of Bsu gene expression has identified a large number of gene families that are up- or down-regulated in response to pH stress (46), general mechanisms for pH-dependent gene regulation are largely unknown. One possible exception is the recent discovery of an RNA element upstream of a putative transporter in E. coli whose secondary structure during transcription is pH dependent in a manner that leads to transcriptional pausing (48); thus, pH-dependent RNA structure serves as a mechanism for regulating transcription of the downstream gene. Although assigning a wide-ranging functional role to AT is unwarranted given current understanding of its physiological effects (49), it is tempting to speculate that the mechanism for pH sensitivity employed by AT could be of broad significance for enabling bacteria to respond to environmental cues.

Materials and Methods

Sample Preparation.

Bsu AT was overexpressed from E. coli cells in defined minimal media. AT and fAT were purified under denaturing conditions by reversed phase HPLC and refolded by dilution and dialysis. pH and concentration dependence of the trimer-dodecamer equilibrium of AT was measured by sequentially dialyzing the same sample into buffers at pH 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, and 6.5 with NMR spectra taken after each dialysis; the concentrations of the fAT solutions varied between 2.14 and 4.74 mM, whereas that for AT varied between 268 μM and 628 μM. Additional details are provided in SI Text.

NMR Spectroscopy of AT.

NMR spectra were acquired on Bruker DRX 600 or 800 NMR spectrometers equipped with cryoprobes at a sample temperature of 55 °C. Samples for resonance assignments consisted of an 8.6 mM (protomer concentration) AT in 20 mM d11-Tris at pH 7.8 (298 K), 250 mM NaCl, 300 μM ZnCl2, 2 mM TCEP [tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine], and 0.02% (wt/vol) NaN3 and a 3.1 mM sample of fAT in 20 mM d11-Tris pH 7.5, 20 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM ZnCl2, and 0.02% (wt/vol) NaN3 unless otherwise specified. Resonance assignments of U-[13C, 15N]-formyl-AT (fAT) and triply labeled, U-[2H, 13C, 15N] AT were obtained by analysis of standard triple resonance NMR spectra (23); assignments for AT3 have been deposited in the BioMagResBank. Backbone amide 15N relaxation data were recorded at 600 MHz, 55 °C using standard methods.

Transverse relaxation rates of amide protons were measured by a 15N-edited 1H CPMG (Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill) sequence. 1H magnetization was excited with a 90° pulse, which was followed by the CPMG pulse train. Magnetization was then transferred to 15N for editing and back to 1H for detection in the standard HSQC fashion (50). 1H-15N multiple quantum transverse relaxation was measured similarly with multiple quantum coherence formed after the first INEPT transfer, which was refocused by a CPMG train on both 1H and 15N. Magnetization was transferred back to 1H for detection. In both measurements, pulse delays were 1 ms in the CPMG train ([τ-180°-τ]n) and the number of 180° pulses was varied from 1 to 64. A reference spectrum with τ = 1 μs and a single 180° pulse were also measured. The amide region of the resulting spectra were integrated and fit to a single exponential decay.

Fitting of pH Dependence of Oligomerization to the Equilibrium Model.

To determine the equilibrium constants in the oligomerization model [Eq. 1], the volumes of resolved resonances from AT12 and AT3 (residues Val10, Ala28, Cys29, Gly31, Gly33, Val34, Ile35, and Thr 42) were integrated and corrected for the transverse relaxation during the coherence transfer portions of the pulse sequence (51). The fraction of AT protomers in AT12 was obtained from the corrected peak volumes by

graphic file with name pnas.1004981107eq14.jpg [2]

as a function of pH and total AT protomer concentration for each of the residues analyzed. The data from signals for each residue were fit to the oligomerization model (Eq. 1) by calculating the likelihood function (52) that the model parameters (pKa and log K1) describe the measured values of fAT12. Simulated values of fAT12 were calculated as a function of pKa (pKa varied from 6.8 to 8.0 in steps of 0.012) and log K1 (log K1 varied from 12 to 20 in steps of 0.08), and the most likely values of pKa and log K1, and their errors, were determined from the likelihood probability distribution (Fig. S5).

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments.

The authors thank V. Gopalan for helpful discussions, J. Xu and S. Oruganti for help with sample preparation, J. Shimko and J. Ottesen with MALDI mass spectrometry, K. Green-Church, C. Yuan, and C. Cottrell of the Ohio State University Campus Chemical Instrument Center for assistance with mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health to M.P.F. (GM077234) and P.G. (GM62750).

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Data deposition: The NMR atomic coordinates, chemical shifts, and restraints have been deposited in the BioMagResBank, www.bmrb.wisc.edu (accession no. 16492).

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1004981107/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Babitzke P, Stults JT, Shire SJ, Yanofsky C. TRAP, the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein of Bacillus subtilis, is a multisubunit complex that appears to recognize G/UAG repeats in the trpEDCFBA and trpG transcripts. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:16597–16604. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Babitzke P, Yanofsky C. Reconstitution of Bacillus subtilis trp attenuation in vitro with TRAP, the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:133–137. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gollnick P. Regulation of the Bacillus subtilis trp operon by an RNA-binding protein. Mol Microbiol. 1994;11:991–997. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00377.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gollnick P, Ishino S, Kuroda MI, Henner DJ, Yanofsky C. The mtr locus is a two-gene operon required for transcription attenuation in the trp operon of Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:8726–8730. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.22.8726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Merino E, Babitzke P, Yanofsky C. trp RNA-binding attenuation protein (TRAP)-trp leader RNA interactions mediate translational as well as transcriptional regulation of the Bacillus subtilis trp operon. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:6362–6370. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.22.6362-6370.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sarsero JP, Merino E, Yanofsky C. A Bacillus subtilis gene of previously unknown function, yhaG, is translationally regulated by tryptophan-activated TRAP and appears to be involved in tryptophan transport. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:2329–2331. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.8.2329-2331.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang M, de Saizieu A, van Loon AP, Gollnick P. Translation of trpG in Bacillus subtilis is regulated by the trp RNA- binding attenuation protein (TRAP) J Bacteriol. 1995;177:4272–4278. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.15.4272-4278.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yakhnin H, Zhang H, Yakhnin AV, Babitzke P. The trp RNA-binding attenuation protein of Bacillus subtilis regulates translation of the tryptophan transport gene trpP (yhaG) by blocking ribosome binding. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:278–286. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.2.278-286.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yakhnin H, Babiarz JE, Yakhnin AV, Babitzke P. Expression of the Bacillus subtilis trpEDCFBA operon is influenced by translational coupling and Rho termination factor. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:5918–5926. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.20.5918-5926.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Du H, Babitzke P. trp RNA-binding attenuation protein-mediated long distance RNA refolding regulates translation of trpE in Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:20494–20503. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.32.20494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Henner DJ, Band L, Shimotsu H. Nucleotide sequence of the Bacillus subtilis tryptophan operon. Gene. 1985;34:169–177. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90125-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schaak JE, Yakhnin H, Bevilacqua PC, Babitzke P. A Mg2+-dependent RNA tertiary structure forms in the Bacillus subtilis trp operon leader transcript and appears to interfere with trpE translation control by inhibiting TRAP binding. J Mol Biol. 2003;332:555–574. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00969-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sarsero JP, Merino E, Yanofsky C. A Bacillus subtilis operon containing genes of unknown function senses tRNATrp charging and regulates expression of the genes of tryptophan biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:2656–2661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.050578997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Du H, Tarpey R, Babitzke P. The trp RNA-binding attenuation protein regulates TrpG synthesis by binding to the trpG ribosome binding site of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:2582–2586. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.8.2582-2586.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Antson AA, et al. 11-fold symmetry of the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein (TRAP) from Bacillus subtilis determined by X-ray analysis. J Mol Biol. 1994;244:1–5. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Antson AA, et al. The structure of trp RNA-binding attenuation protein. Nature. 1995;374:693–700. doi: 10.1038/374693a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Antson AA, et al. Structure of the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein, TRAP, bound to RNA. Nature. 1999;401:235–242. doi: 10.1038/45730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Valbuzzi A, Yanofsky C. Inhibition of the B. subtilis regulatory protein TRAP by the TRAP- inhibitory protein, AT. Science. 2001;293:2057–2059. doi: 10.1126/science.1062187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Snyder D, Lary J, Chen Y, Gollnick P, Cole JL. Interaction of the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein (TRAP) with anti-TRAP. J Mol Biol. 2004;338:669–682. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Valbuzzi A, Yanofsky C. Zinc is required for assembly and function of the anti-trp RNA-binding attenuation protein, AT. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:48574–48578. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208980200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shevtsov MB, Chen Y, Gollnick P, Antson AA. Crystal structure of Bacillus subtilis anti-TRAP protein, an antagonist of TRAP/RNA interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:17600–17605. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508728102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McElroy C, Manfredo A, Wendt A, Gollnick P, Foster M. TROSY-NMR studies of the 91 kDa TRAP protein reveal allosteric control of a gene regulatory protein by ligand-altered flexibility. J Mol Biol. 2002;323:463–473. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00940-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McElroy CA. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Univ; 2005. Dynamics and function: Mechanistic studies of the gene regulatory proteins TRAP and anti-TRAP. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McElroy CA, Manfredo A, Gollnick P, Foster MP. Thermodynamics of tryptophan-mediated activation of the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein. Biochemistry. 2006;45:7844–7853. doi: 10.1021/bi0526074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Valbuzzi A, Gollnick P, Babitzke P, Yanofsky C. The anti-trp RNA-binding attenuation protein (Anti-TRAP), AT, recognizes the tryptophan-activated RNA binding domain of the TRAP regulatory protein. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:10608–10613. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111813200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen Y, Gollnick P. Alanine scanning mutagenesis of anti-TRAP (AT) reveals residues involved in binding to TRAP. J Mol Biol. 2008;377:1529–1543. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Watanabe M, et al. The nature of the TRAP-Anti-TRAP complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:2176–2181. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801032106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang WJ, Yanofsky C. Effects of tryptophan starvation on levels of the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein (TRAP) and anti-TRAP regulatory protein and their influence on trp operon expression in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:1884–1891. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.6.1884-1891.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wyman J, Gill SJ. Binding and Linkage: Functional Chemistry of Biological Macromolecules. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books; 1990. p. 330. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shevtsov MB, et al. Bacillus licheniformis anti-TRAP can assemble into two types of dodecameric particles with the same symmetry but inverted orientation of trimers. J Struct Biol. 2010;170:127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhou H-X, Rivas G, Minton AP. Macromolecular crowding and confinement: Biochemical, biophysical, and potential physiological consequences. Annu Rev Biophys. 2008;37:375–397. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rule GS, Hitchens TK. Fundamentals of Protein NMR Spectroscopy. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dorman DE, Bovey FA. Proton coupled carbon-13 magnetic resonance spectra. The simple amides. J Org Chem. 1973;38:1719–1722. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vaara J, Kaski J, Jokisaari J, Diehl P. NMR properties of formamide: A first principles and experimental study. J Phys Chem A. 1997;101:5069–5081. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Foster MP, et al. Chemical shift as a probe of molecular interfaces: NMR studies of DNA binding by the three amino-terminal zinc finger domains from transcription factor IIIA. J Biomol NMR. 1998;12:51–71. doi: 10.1023/a:1008290631575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Garcia de la Torre J, Huertas ML, Carrasco B. HYDRONMR: Prediction of NMR relaxation of globular proteins from atomic-level structures and hydrodynamic calculations. J Magn Reson. 2000;147:138–146. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2000.2170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jerschow A, Mueller N. Suppression of convection artifacts in stimulated-echo diffusion experiments. Double-stimulated-echo experiments. J Magn Reson. 1997;125:372–375. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shevtsov MB, Chen Y, Gollnick P, Antson AA. Anti-TRAP protein from Bacillus subtilis: Crystallization and internal symmetry. Acta Crystallogr D . 2004;60:1311–1314. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904011199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shioi JI, Matsuura S, Imae Y. Quantitative measurements of proton motive force and motility in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1980;144:891–897. doi: 10.1128/jb.144.3.891-897.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Magill NG, Cowan AE, Koppel DE, Setlow P. The internal pH of the forespore compartment of Bacillus megaterium decreases by about 1 pH unit during sporulation. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:2252–2258. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.8.2252-2258.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.McCabe BC, Gollnick P. Cellular levels of trp RNA-binding attenuation protein in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:5157–5159. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.15.5157-5159.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Whatmore AM, Reed RH. Determination of turgor pressure in Bacillus subtilis: A possible role for K+ in turgor regulation. J Gen Microbiol. 1990;136:2521–2526. doi: 10.1099/00221287-136-12-2521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schulz GE. The dominance of symmetry in the evolution of homo-oligomeric proteins. J Mol Biol. 2010;395:834–843. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dedmon MM, Patel CN, Young GB, Pielak GJ. FlgM gains structure in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:12681–12684. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202331299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Augustus AM, Reardon PN, Spicer LD. MetJ repressor interactions with DNA probed by in-cell NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:5065–5069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811130106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Padan E, Bibi E, Ito M, Krulwich TA. Alkaline pH homeostasis in bacteria: New insights. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1717:67–88. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Errington J. Bacillus subtilis sporulation: Regulation of gene expression and control of morphogenesis. Microbiol Rev. 1993;57:1–33. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.1.1-33.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nechooshtan G, Elgrably-Weiss M, Sheaffer A, Westhof E, Altuvia S. A pH-responsive riboregulator. Genes Dev. 2009;23:2650–2662. doi: 10.1101/gad.552209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cruz-Vera LR, Gong M, Yanofsky C. Physiological effects of anti-TRAP protein activity and tRNA(Trp) charging on trp operon expression in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:1937–1945. doi: 10.1128/JB.01820-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mori S, Abeygunawardana C, Johnson MO, van Zijl PC. Improved sensitivity of HSQC spectra of exchanging protons at short interscan delays using a new fast HSQC (FHSQC) detection scheme that avoids water saturation. J Magn Reson Ser B. 1995;108:94–98. doi: 10.1006/jmrb.1995.1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rance M, Loria JP, Palmer AGr. Sensitivity improvement of transverse relaxation-optimized spectroscopy. J Magn Reson. 1999;136:92–101. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1998.1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sivia DS. Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES