Abstract

The first Pd(II)-catalyzed alkylation of aryl C–H bonds is achieved without using a co-oxidant. The alkylation reaction was followed thereafter by an intramolecular lactonization to give broadly useful γ– and ™– benzolactones.
Pd(0)-initiated arylation of C–H bonds with aryl halides is among the earliest examples in Pd-catalyzed C–H activation/arylation chemistry.1–7 A single pioneering example of Pd(0)-catalyzed alkylation of aryl C–H bonds using a tethered alkyl chloride was also developed by Buchwald for highly efficient syntheses of oxindoles.8 In these reactions, no external oxidant other than the aryl halides or alkyl halides themselves are needed, affording this C–H functionalization process a practical advantage. Recently, Pd(II)-catalyzed arylation using Ar2IX as the stoichiometric oxidant through a Pd(II)/Pd(IV) catalytic cycle has undergone major advances.9,10 Especially noteworthy is the broad range of arylation reactions using ArI/AgOAc.11 To our knowledge, Pd-catalyzed intermolecular alkylation of C–H bonds with alkyl halides12,13 remains an unsolved problem, except for a single example of methylation of acetanilide via Pd(II)/Pd(IV) catalysis reported by Tremont (Scheme 1).14 However, in this case, the side reaction of AgOAc with methyl iodide prevented efficient catalysis with this protocol. Herein we report a sequential monoselective alkylation/lactonization reaction of benzoic acids with 1,2-dichcloroethane, dichloromethane and dibromomethane. Alkylation with 1-chloropentane was also found to proceed, albeit in lower yield. For the first time, Pd-catalyzed alkylation of C–H bonds in the absence of Ag(I) oxidant is made possible. Preliminary mechanistic investigations have also been carried out to shed light into the nature of the catalytic cycle.
Scheme 1.
Pd-Catalyzed Alkylation of Aryl C–H Bonds
We recently established that the κ2-coordination of a cation with a carboxylate group forces Pd(II) to chelate in the proximity of the ortho-C–H bonds (for benzoic acid and phenyl acetic acid substrates) and β-C–H bonds (for aliphatic acids), a geometry that is essential for facile C–H cleavage.15 The broad utility of carboxylate groups prompted us to develop a potentially useful catalytic system for alkylation of C–H bonds for these substrates.
In Tremont’s Pd(II)/Pd(IV) catalytic cycle for methylation with MeI and arylation with ArI, the Pd–I species formed in each cycle needs to be converted to Pd(OAc)2 by AgOAc. Knowing that Pd–Cl or Pd–Br species would be generated when alkyl chlorides or bromides were used as the alkylating reagents, we began our screening efforts using 1,2-dichloroethane as the alkylating reagent with the aim of discovering conditions that would promote displacement of chloride from the Pd-Cl species by a benzoate anion to close the catalytic cycle (Table 1). We were pleased to find that the presence of K2HPO4 alone is sufficient for the catalytic alkylation to proceed (Table 1, entry 1). As anticipated, the initially formed alkylation product underwent a SN2 reaction to give the corresponding lactone. A control experiment showed that the Pd catalyst is essential (entry 2). The major competing side reaction is the SN2 reaction between the substrate and 1,2-dichloroethane. For instance, the use of K2CO3 and Cs2CO3 resulted in predominant formation of the SN2 product (entries 5 and 9). The use of K2HPO4 is decisively superior to Na2HPO4 with the latter giving a negligible amount of the desired product. This catalytic reaction can be performed under either air or argon with the latter giving a slightly lower yield (entry 3). The minor effect of O2 suggests that a small amount of Pd(0) may have been formed through side reactions and that O2 could reoxidize the Pd(0) back into the catalytic cycle.
Table 1.
Influence of Bases on the Alkylation Reaction
![]() | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Base (equiv) | a %a | b %a | c %a | Remaining Substrate %a |
| 1 | K2HPO4 (3) | 82 | 10 | 4 | 0 |
| 2b | K2HPO4 (3) | 0 | 16 | 33 | 16 |
| 3c | K2HPO4 (3) | 67 | 16 | 8 | 0 |
| 4 | KHCO3 (2) | 40 | 23 | <1 | 35 |
| 5 | K2CO3 (2) | 32 | 58 | <1 | 5 |
| 6 | K3PO4 (2) | 34 | 34 | 2 | 0 |
| 7 | Na2CO3 (2) | 17 | <2 | 0 | 74 |
| 8 | Na2HPO4 (3) | 3 | 0 | 0 | 97 |
| 9 | Cs2CO3 (2) | 0 | 90 | 5 | 0 |
Yield was determined by 1H NMR analysis of crude product using CH2Br2 as the internal standard;
No Pd(OAc)2;
The reaction was carried out under an atmosphere of argon.
This optimized protocol was then tested with other substrates. Although alkylation of closely related benzoic acids (Table 2, entry 2) under identical conditions gave the desired products in comparable yields, further variation in substitution on the arene resulted in a significant decrease in the yields. In most cases the SN2 reaction was predominant due to an increase in nucleophilicity of the carboxylate or an increase in the acidity of the parent carboxylic acid. We were pleased to find that careful selection of the base restored reactivity with a wider range of benzoic acids. For instance, alkylation of benzoic acids (entries 4–8) proceeded to a noticeable extent when various carbonates were used. The alkylation of electron-deficient arenes afforded synthetically useful yields when KHCO3 (entry 7) or Na2CO3 (entry 8) was used. Of particular mechanistic importance, it was found that alkylation with 1-chloropentane was feasible, albeit in only 26% yield due to significant formation of the SN2 product (entry 9).
Table 2.
Alkylation with 1,2-Dichloroethane or Pentylchloride a
![]() | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Substrate | Base | Temperature | Product | Yield %b |
| 1 | ![]() |
K2HPO4 3.0 equiv. |
115 °C | ![]() |
81 34c |
| 2 | ![]() |
K2HPO4 3.0 equiv. |
115 °C | ![]() |
80 |
| 3 | ![]() |
K2HPO4 3.0 equiv. |
115 °C | ![]() |
55 |
| 4 | KHCO3 2.5 equiv. |
140 °C | ![]() |
51 | |
| 5 | KHCO3 2.5 equiv. |
140 °C | ![]() |
42 | |
| 6 | Na2CO3 3.0 equiv. |
140 °C | ![]() |
45 | |
| 7 | KHCO3 2.5 equiv. |
140 °C | ![]() |
67 | |
| 8 | Na2CO3 3.0 equiv. |
140 °C | ![]() |
75 | |
| 9d | ![]() |
K2HPO4 3.0 equiv. |
115 °C | ![]() |
26 |
Unless otherwise noted, the reaction was carried out on a 0.5 mmol scale in 2.0 mL 1,2-dichloroethane;
Isolated yield;
10 mol% PdCl2;
2.0 mL n-Pentyl chloride instead of 1,2-dichloroethane.
To further expand the scope of this alkylation reaction, we tested dichloromethane and dibromomethane as the alkylating reagents. Although dichloromethane only worked well with a few substrates (Table 3, entry 2), the use of dibromomethane substantially improved the reaction yields and expanded the substrate scope. Electron-withdrawing halo and trifluoromethyl groups were well tolerated. Keto and ester groups were also compatible, though they gave lower yields. Most importantly, the alkylation protocols with both dichloroethane and dibromomethane exhibit exclusive mono-selectivity at the less hindered ortho-position, partly due to rapid lactone formation. The catalyst loading can be reduced to 5 mol% (entry 2).
Table 3.
Alkylation with Dibromomethane a
![]() | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Substrate | Product | Yield %d | Entry | Substrate | Product | Yield %d |
| 1b | ![]() |
![]() |
81 | 9c | ![]() |
![]() |
62 |
| 2b,e | ![]() |
![]() |
92 83f 68g 80h |
10b | ![]() |
![]() |
90 |
| 3b | ![]() |
![]() |
62 | 11b | ![]() |
![]() |
71 |
| 4c | ![]() |
![]() |
81 | 12c | ![]() |
![]() |
47 |
| 5c | ![]() |
![]() |
75 | 13c | ![]() |
![]() |
55 |
| 6c | ![]() |
![]() |
59 | 14b | ![]() |
![]() |
87 |
| 7c | ![]() |
![]() |
81 | ![]() |
7 | ||
| 8c | ![]() |
![]() |
72 | 15b | ![]() |
![]() |
68 |
Unless otherwise noted, the reaction was carried out on a 0.5 mmol scale in 2.0 mL dibromomethane;
3.0 equiv. K2HPO4, 140 °C;
2.5 equiv. KHCO3, 140 °C;
Isolated yield;
115 °C;
2.0 mL Dichloromethane instead of dibromomethane;
10 mol% PdBr2;
5 mol% Pd(OAc)2.
From the viewpoint of synthetic applications, δ-benzolactones (Table 2) can be readily converted into coumarins through dehydrogenative oxidations.16 Although alkylation with dibromomethane introduces only one carbon unit into the arene, the excellent reactivity of the new benzylic carbon allows for versatile elongation using a broad range of nucleophiles to afford valuable building blocks for synthesis (Scheme 2).17
Scheme 2.
Building Blocks Derived from Benzolactones
To gain insights into the reaction mechanism and catalytic cycle, further experimental studies were performed. The observation that 1 and 2 were unreactive using both Pd(OAc)2 or PdBr2 (Scheme 3) speaks against a mechanism whereby nucleophilic substitution occurs first, followed by C–H activation which is initiated by oxidative addition to the intramolecular halide.8 This data combined with that of the kinetic isotope effect studies also do not support a Friedel-Crafts-type reaction mediated by the Pd(II) catalyst or by trace quantities of HCl generated from Pd(II) salts (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3.
Preliminary Mechanistic Studies
Finally, the ortho-C–H insertion intermediate 4 obtained with o-toluic acid15 allowed us to test the reactivity of such aryl palladium species with alkyl halides. We found that treatment of 4 with dibromomethane afforded the anticipated lactone as the major product (eq 1).
![]() |
(1) |
The alkylation of the arylpalladium intermediate 5 may involve oxidation of Pd(II) to Pd(IV) by alkyl halides as proposed by Tremont14 and a subsequent reductive elimination occurs to give the desired product. However, in light of previous discoveries that arylpalladium species react as a nucleophile with electrophiles such as aldehydes and ketones,18 we believe that direct σ-bond metathesis8 between the aryl–Pd and the alkyl halide is also possible (eq. 2). In both cases, Pd–halide species are formed. Although alkylation using 10 mol% PdCl2 and PdBr2 gave the desired product in 34% and 68% respectively, the formation of palladium benzoate in situ could still be responsible for the catalytic C–H activation reactivity.
![]() |
(2) |
In summary, we have developed the first Pd(II)-catalyzed alkylation of aryl C-H bonds without using co-oxidants. This reaction provides a very simple and efficient synthetic method for benzolatones.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge The Scripps Research Institute, the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS, 1 R01 GM084019-01A1), Amgen and Lilly for financial support, and A. P. Sloan Foundation for a Fellowship (J.-Q. Yu).
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedure and characterization of all new compounds (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.For arylation of heterocycles see: Nakamura N, Tajima Y, Sakai K. Heterocycles. 1982;17:235.Akita Y, Ohta A. Heterocycles. 1982;19:329.Pivsa-Art S, Satoh T, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Nomura M. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1998;71:467.Park CH, Ryabova V, Seregin IV, Sromek AW, Gevorgyan V. Org Lett. 2004;6:1159. doi: 10.1021/ol049866q.Touré BB, Lane BS, Sames D. Org Lett. 2006;8:1979. doi: 10.1021/ol053021c.Roger J, Doucet H. Org Biomol Chem. 2008;6:169. doi: 10.1039/b715235c.Mousseau JJ, Larivée A, Charette AB. Org Lett. 2008;10:1641. doi: 10.1021/ol800396v.Ackermann L, Althammer A, Fenner S. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:201. doi: 10.1002/anie.200804517.
- 2.For pioneering works on Pd(0)-catalyzed arylation of arenes see: Hennings DD, Iwasa S, Rawal VH. J Org Chem. 1997;62:2. doi: 10.1021/jo961876k.Satoh T, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Nomura M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1997;36:1740.
- 3.For Pd(0)-catalyzed intramolecular arylation of arenes see: Roesch KR, Larock RC. J Org Chem. 1998;63:5306.Dong CG, Hu QS. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:2289. doi: 10.1002/anie.200504310.Ren H, Knochel P. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:3462. doi: 10.1002/anie.200600111.Cruz ACF, Miller ND, Willis MC. Org Lett. 2007;9:4391. doi: 10.1021/ol702044z.Watanabe T, Oishi S, Fujii N, Ohno H. Org Lett. 2008;10:1759. doi: 10.1021/ol800425z.
- 4.For Pd (0)-catalyzed intermolecular arylation of sp2 C-H bonds see: Kametani Y, Satoh T, Miura M, Nomura M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:2655.Gürbüz N, Özdemir I, Çetinkaya B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:2273.Lafrance M, Fagnou K. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:16496. doi: 10.1021/ja067144j.Chiong HA, Pham Q-N, Daugulis O. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:9879. doi: 10.1021/ja071845e.Lu J, Tan X, Chen C. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:7768. doi: 10.1021/ja072844p.
- 5.For norbornene-mediated Catellani arylation see: Catellani M, Frignani F, Rangoni A. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1997;36:119.Alberico D, Scott ME, Lautens M. Chem Rev. 2007;107:174. doi: 10.1021/cr0509760.
- 6.For intramolecular arylation of sp3 C-H bonds see: Dyker G. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1992;31:1023.Baudoin O, Herrbach A, Guéritte F. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:5736. doi: 10.1002/anie.200352461.Zhao J, Campo M, Larock RC. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:1873. doi: 10.1002/anie.200462327.Barder TE, Walker SD, Martinelli JR, Buchwald SL. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:4685. doi: 10.1021/ja042491j.Lafrance M, Gorelsky SI, Fagnou K. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:14570. doi: 10.1021/ja076588s.
- 7.For a recent review on arylation of C-H bonds catalyzed by other transition metals see: Lewis JC, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1013. doi: 10.1021/ar800042p.and reference therein.
- 8.Hennessy EJ, Buchwald SL. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:12084. doi: 10.1021/ja037546g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.For arylation of aldehydic C-H bonds using Ar2IX see: Xia M, Chen ZC. Syn Commun. 2000;30:531.
- 10.(a) Kalyani D, Deprez NR, Desai LV, Sanford MS. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:7330. doi: 10.1021/ja051402f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Daugulis O, Zaitsev VG. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:4046. doi: 10.1002/anie.200500589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Zaitsev VG, Shabashov D, Daugulis O. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:13154. doi: 10.1021/ja054549f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Reddy BVS, Reddy LR, Corey EJ. Org Lett. 2006;8:3391. doi: 10.1021/ol061389j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.For Pd-catalyzed alkylation of C-H bonds with organometallic reagents see: Chen X, Li JJ, Hao XS, Goodhue CE, Yu JQ. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:78. doi: 10.1021/ja0570943.
- 13.For seminal work on Negishi cross-coupling with alkyl halides see: Zhou J, Fu GC. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:12527. doi: 10.1021/ja0363258.
- 14.Tremont SJ, Rahman HU. J Am Chem Soc. 1984;106:5759. [Google Scholar]
- 15.For detailed discussion and evidence for cation-promoted Pd insertion into C–H bonds, see: Giri R, Yu JQ. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14082. doi: 10.1021/ja8063827.and references therein.
- 16.Kinder MA, Kopf J, Margaretha P. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:6763. [Google Scholar]
- 17.(a) Ho T-L, Chang MH. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 1. 1999;17:2479. [Google Scholar]; (b) Price CC, Rogers RG. Organic Syntheses. 1942:22. [Google Scholar]; (c) Bornstein J, Drummond PE, Bedell SF. Organic Syntheses. 1958;38:81. [Google Scholar]; (d) Shibuya M, Sakai Y, Naoe Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995;36:897. [Google Scholar]
- 18.(a) Larock RC, Doty MJ, Cacchi S. J Org Chem. 1993;58:4579. [Google Scholar]; (b) Gevorgyan V, Quan LG, Yamamoto Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:4089. [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhao L, Lu X. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2002;41:4343. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20021115)41:22<4343::AID-ANIE4343>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Sole D, Vallverdu L, Solans X, Font-Bardia M, Bonjoch J. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:1587. doi: 10.1021/ja029114w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




















































