Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a disorder of retinal vasoproliferation that occurs mainly in extremely preterm infants [1]. The long-term visual outcome among children with ROP includes a prominently increased risk of a range of visual disabilities [2]. Understanding the etiology and pathogenesis of ROP is crucial for the design of strategies to prevent and treat this potentially disabling disease.
Less than a decade ago, one review included the statement “only low birth weight, low gestational age, and supplemental oxygen therapy following delivery have been consistently associated with disease” [3]. This statement was made despite the recognition by others that other antecedents might be important, including insufficient levels of vitamin E, indomethacin treatment for patent ductus arteriosus, hypercapnia, maternal aspirin use, and transfusion of blood and blood products or the need for such transfusions [4].
While immaturity at birth and exposure to supplemental oxygen unquestionably play important etiologic roles in ROP [5], the possibility that exposures to infectious and inflammatory stimuli contribute to ROP is only gradually receiving attention. As recently as 2003 one review included the statement that “the relationships between infections and the development of ROP remain unclear” [6], while another stated that “the role of an inflammatory reaction in the pathophysiology of ROP has not been thoroughly investigated” [7].
Exposure to infection and elevated concentrations of inflammation-related proteins in the placenta and/or neonatal body fluids are associated with an increased risk for preterm delivery [8], respiratory dysfunctions [9], as well as brain damage and subsequent disability among preterm infants [10]. This concept that fetal/neonatal inflammation has adverse effects has been expanded to include ROP and other visual disturbances in preterm infants [11]. Indeed, some of the data in papers discussed below support the impression that ROP pathogenesis begins in utero.
The current pathogenetic model
In brief, the current pathogenetic model of ROP postulates that early neonatal exposure of the immature retina to high levels of oxygen reduces the retinal level of pro-angiogenetic growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), leading to cessation of vessel growth [12]. Subsequent relative hypoxia then leads to relatively higher VEGF levels and an overgrowth of retinal vasculature. Aspects of vulnerability include genetic components [13] and the relative inability to sustain normal vascularization in the face of adversity (e.g., low levels of VEGF [14] and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) [15].
Infection and ROP
Multiple studies suggest that neonatal infection is a risk factor for ROP. Candida sepsis is associated with a more than fourfold increased risk for ROP (stage 3 or higher) in a multivariable analysis that adjusted for birth weight, gestational age, days on supplemental oxygen, and 5-minute Apgar score [16]. Neonatal sepsis in general (not restricted to Candida) is also associated with ROP [17]. Among more than 15,000 very low birth weight infants from the Israel Neonatal Network, those who had early sepsis were twice as likely to develop severe ROP as their peers who did not have early sepsis [18].
Inflammation and ROP
If hyperoxia and infection are viewed as distal causes of ROP, then oxidative stress and inflammation are the more proximal causes. Oxidative stress, which can be a consequence of inflammation [19], has long been implicated in ROP etiology [20]. Inflammatory processes might interfere with normal retinal vascularization in the most vulnerable retinas. For example, in a murine hyperoxia model of ROP [21], knock-out mice that lack the strongly pro-inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) appear to be relatively protected [22]. In another study of hyperoxia-induced ROP, omega-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids decreased the size of the avascular area and this protective effect appeared to be mediated, at least in part, via suppression of TNFα [23].
Evidence is just beginning to accumulate that markers of inflammation appear to be associated with ROP in human studies. So far, we know of one report of an association between histologic chorioamnionitis and ROP based on a univariable data analysis [24]. Additional support comes from a more recent and larger observational study of more than 800 extremely low birth weight infants [25]. Over the first three postnatal weeks, the systemic levels of eight cytokines and chemokines were significantly different in infants with ROP compared to controls. For example, the immuno-modulatory interleukin 18 was significantly lower on the first postnatal day, while elevated on days 7, 14, and 21 in infants who later developed severe ROP compared to controls.
Multi-factorial models of disease causation tend to require multiple “hits” [26]. Our data support the hypothesis that multiple hits increase ROP risk. We found that the co-occurrence of immaturity plus pro-inflammatory “hits,” such as clinical chorioamnionitis and neonatal systemic inflammation is associated with an increased risk for ROP [27]. Moreover, we also identified interactions beyond additive (and even multiplicative) patterns among the three “hits” neonatal sepsis, oxygen exposure, and low gestational age (Minghua Chen, personal communication).
Recent evidence supports the notion that poor neonatal weight gain predicts ROP [28]. It will be important to explore to what extent what is attributed to poor neonatal weight gain in ROP etiology should instead be attributed to antecedents of poor weight gain, (e.g., intrauterine inflammation) [29].
Summary and conclusion
In sum, increasing evidence suggests a role for neonatal infection and perinatal inflammation in ROP pathogenesis. The exact mechanism and timing of this inflammatory component of ROP pathogenesis remain to be elucidated, but might deserve the attention of those who wish to prevent ROP and its devastating consequences.
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to Alan Leviton for helpful suggestions how to improve this paper. My work on retinopathy of prematurity is supported by the National Eye Institute (5R21EY019253-02).
References
- 1.Phelps DL. Retinopathy of prematurity. In: AA Fanaroff, Martin RJ., editors. Neonatal-perinatal medicine: diseases of the fetus and infant. Mosby; St. Louis: 2002. pp. 1595–602. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Group, C.f.R.o.P.C. Multicenter Trial of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity: ophthalmological outcomes at 10 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(8):1110–8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.8.1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wheatley CM, et al. Retinopathy of prematurity: recent advances in our understanding. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(6):696–700. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.6.696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.McColm JR, Fleck BW. Retinopathy of prematurity: causation. Semin Neonatol. 2001;6(6):453–60. doi: 10.1053/siny.2001.0079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Flynn JT, et al. A cohort study of transcutaneous oxygen tension and the incidence and severity of retinopathy of prematurity. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(16):1050–4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199204163261603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stout AU, Stout JT. Retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2003;50(1):77–87. vi. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(02)00111-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mechoulam H, Pierce EA. Retinopathy of prematurity: molecular pathology and therapeutic strategies. Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2003;3(4):261–77. doi: 10.2165/00129785-200303040-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Romero R, et al. The role of inflammation and infection in preterm birth. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25(1):21–39. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-956773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bose CL, Dammann CE, Laughon MM. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia and inflammatory biomarkers in the premature neonate. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93(6):F455–61. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.121327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dammann O, O'Shea TM. Cytokines and perinatal brain damage. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35(4):643–63. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2008.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dammann O, Leviton A. Inflammation, brain damage and visual dysfunction in preterm infants. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;11(5):363–8. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2006.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen J, Smith LE. Retinopathy of prematurity. Angiogenesis. 2007;10(2):133–40. doi: 10.1007/s10456-007-9066-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cooke RW, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and retinopathy of prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(6):1712–5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pierce EA, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor expression in a mouse model of retinal neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(3):905–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.3.905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hellstrom A, et al. Postnatal serum insulin-like growth factor I deficiency is associated with retinopathy of prematurity and other complications of premature birth. Pediatrics. 2003;112(5):1016–20. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.5.1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mittal M, Dhanireddy R, Higgins RD. Candida sepsis and association with retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics. 1998;101(4 Pt 1):654–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.4.654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu PM, et al. Risk factors of retinopathy of prematurity in premature infants weighing less than 1600 g. Am J Perinatol. 2005;22(2):115–20. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-837276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Klinger G, et al. Outcome of Early-Onset Sepsis in a National Cohort of Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Pediatrics. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Saugstad OD. Oxidative stress in the newborn--a 30-year perspective. Biol Neonate. 2005;88(3):228–36. doi: 10.1159/000087586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sullivan JL. Retinopathy of prematurity and iron: a modification of the oxygen hypothesis. Pediatrics. 1986;78:1171–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Smith LE, et al. Oxygen-induced retinopathy in the mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35(1):101–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gardiner TA, et al. Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha improves physiological angiogenesis and reduces pathological neovascularization in ischemic retinopathy. Am J Pathol. 2005;166(2):637–44. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)62284-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Connor KM, et al. Increased dietary intake of omega-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids reduces pathological retinal angiogenesis. Nat Med. 2007;13(7):868–73. doi: 10.1038/nm1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Polam S, et al. Effect of chorioamnionitis on neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(11):1032–5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.11.1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sood BG, et al. Perinatal Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Retinopathy of Prematurity. Pediatr Res. 2009 doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181d01a36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ashley DJ. The two “hit” and multiple “hit” theories of carcinogenesis. Br J Cancer. 1969;23(2):313–28. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1969.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dammann O, et al. Immaturity, perinatal inflammation, and retinopathy of prematurity: A multi-hit hypothesis. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85:325–9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hellstrom A, et al. New insights into the development of retinopathy of prematurity - importance of early weight gain. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:502–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01568.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mestan K, et al. Placental Inflammatory Response Is Associated With Poor Neonatal Growth: Preterm Birth Cohort Study. Pediatrics. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
