Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2010 Mar 15;51(4):1345–1359. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.018

Table 12.

Comparison between MAPS indirect atrophy rate and MAPS-HBSI. Three subjects were excluded from the indirect atrophy rate comparison due to missing SNT volumes at 12-month follow-up (2 MCI subjects (031_S_0568 and 002_S_0954) and 1 AD subject (141_S_0852)). Three subjects were excluded from the correlation analysis because: the baseline AVLT score of 1 AD subject (099_S_0372) was -1 in Trial V, the 12-month repeat AVLT scores of 1 AD subject (073_S_0565) were all -1 in Trials I-V and the 12-month repeat AVLT scores of 1 MCI subject (067_S_0607) were -1 in Trials IV and V.

MAPS indirect atrophy rate MAPS-HBSI MAPS indirect atrophy rate vs MAPS-HBSI

Mean (SD) atrophy rate, % Differences in mean (95% CI) SD ratio (95% CI)
Controls (n=98) 1.40 (3.11) 1.15 (2.02) 0.25 (-0.19 to 0.69), p=0.13 1.54 (1.33 to 1.78), p<0.001
MCI (n=141) 3.68 (3.92) 2.80 (2.43) 0.88 (0.38 to 1.37), p<0.001 1.61 (1.42 to 1.83), p<0.001
AD (n=61) 4.57 (3.76) 4.57 (2.38) -0.01 (-0.83 to 0.81), p=0.49 1.58 (1.27 to 1.97), p<0.001

Sample size (95% CI) Sample size ratio (95% CI)
AD rate alone 170 (99 to 488) 68 (48 to 99) 2.51 (1.43 to 5.66), p<0.05
Controlling for aging 354 (169 to 1419) 121 (77 to 206) 2.92 (1.45 to 8.64), p<0.05

Sample size (95% CI) Sample size ratio (95% CI)
MCI rate alone 285 (193 to 471) 189 (139 to 289) 1.50 (1.09 to 2.21), p<0.05
Controlling for aging 742 (367 to 2147) 545 (296 to 1331) 1.36 (0.73 to 2.80), p>0.05

Correlation between atrophy rate and change in AVLT (95% CI) Differences in correlation (95% CI)
MCI (n=140) -0.15 (-0.31 to 0.02)
p=0.08
-0.22 (-0.38 to -0.06)
p=0.008
0.07 (-0.03 to 0.18 to 0.03), p=0.18
AD (n = 59) 0.13 (-0.13 to 0.37)
p=0.33
0.04 (-0.22 to 0.20)
p=0.77
0.09 (-0.23 to 0.41), p=0.58