Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr;14(4):402–409. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.06.010

Table 4.

Association of baseline treatment expectations and preferences with change in WOMAC pain score and OMERACT-OARSI responder at follow-up: matched for both participant and physiotherapist.

Change in WOMAC pain at 6 months
Change in WOMAC pain at 12 months
Unadjusted mean difference (95% CI) Adjusteda mean difference (95% CI) Unadjusted mean difference (95% CI) Adjusteda mean difference (95% CI)
Matched patient and therapist treatment preferences
 Yes cf. nob −0.57 (−1.75, 0.62) −0.92 (−2.07, 0.23) −0.27 (−1.62, 1.08) −0.71 (−2.00, 0.59)
Matched patient and therapist treatment expectationsc
 Yes cf. nob 1.21 (0.32, 2.10) 0.82 (−0.05, 1.69) 1.33 (0.33, 2.34) 0.92 (−0.05, 1.89)



Treatment responder at 6 months
Treatment responder at 12 months
Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
Adjusteda odds ratio (95% CI)
Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
Adjusteda odds ratio (95% CI)
Matched patient and therapist treatment preferences
 Yes cf. Nod 0.92 (0.50, 1.70) 0.88 (0.46, 1.68) 0.77 (0.41, 1.45) 0.70 (0.36, 1.38)
Matched patient and therapist treatment expectationsc
 Yes cf. nod 1.58 (0.99, 2.52) 1.40 (0.86, 2.28) 1.62 (1.00, 2.62) 1.52 (0.91, 2.53)
a

Adjusted for baseline WOMAC pain, age, gender, duration of knee problems, and randomised treatment group.

b

Compared to a change of 0 in the not matched group.

c

Using cut-offs (at median) to define high/low treatment expectations.

d

Compared to an odds ratio of 1 in the comparison group.