Abstract
Natural regulatory T (nTreg)3 cells recognize self-peptides with high affinity, yet the understanding of how affinity influences their selection in the thymus is incomplete. We use altered peptide ligands in transgenic mice and in organ culture to create thymic environments spanning a broad range of ligand affinity. We demonstrate that the nTreg TCR repertoire is shaped by affinity-based selection, similar to conventional T (Tconv) cells. The effect of each ligand on the two populations is distinct, consistent with early nTreg cell lineage specification. Foxp3 expression is an independent process that does not rely on “high affinity” binding per se, but requires a high-potency agonistic interaction for its induction. The timing of ligand exposure, TGFβ signaling, and the organization of the thymic architecture are also important. The development of nTreg cells is therefore a multi-step process where ligand affinity, potency and timing of presentation all play roles in determining cell fate.
Keywords: thymus, repertoire development, T cell receptors, peptides, transgenic mice
INTRODUCTION
Immunosuppressive nTreg cells are generated in the thymus and comprise a distinct T cell subpopulation with a dominant inhibitory effect on autoreactive lymphocytes (1-3). The importance of appropriate nTreg cell development and function in the maintenance of tolerance is demonstrated by the multi-system autoimmune condition that results from their deficiency, which occurs after neonatal thymectomy or is caused by mutations in the FOXP3 gene in humans and mice (4-8). This disease is characterized by thyroiditis, dermatitis, bowel inflammation, and anemia beginning within the neonatal period (9-11). Foxp3 is a member of the forkhead/winged helix group of transcription regulators and is currently the most specific marker for identifying nTreg cells (12). Initially identified as essential for nTreg lineage specification (13, 14), the role of Foxp3 may largely be to stabilize the nTreg cell phenotype and effector function (12, 15-17). While the central role of Foxp3 in tolerance is well established, the thymic signals and selection steps culminating in Foxp3 expression are unclear.
TCR transgenic mice have been used to study nTreg cell development. In some systems, high affinity interactions between the TCR and peptide-MHC complexes on the surface of thymic APCs results in an increase in the percent and number of nTreg cells. In these systems, lower affinity interactions are insufficient to drive precursors into the nTreg lineage. These data have been interpreted to support the hypothesis that the affinity threshold for nTreg cell positive selection lies within or immediately below the threshold for the deletion of Tconv thymocytes (18-21). Yet nTreg cells can also be deleted during development, suggesting that high affinity interactions may mediate both the positive and negative selection of these cells. These data are difficult to integrate into the current affinity-based models of Tconv thymocyte development. In most TCR transgenic mice, nTreg cells with the transgenic TCR are not normally observed, and the effect of cognate antigen exposure during their development has been examined in only a few cases. A titration of ligand affinity as a test of this “instructive” or affinity-based hypothesis on nTreg cell selection has not been reported.
In prior studies, we examined the relationship between TCR signal strength and the development of Hb(64-76)-specific Tconv cells in vivo by introducing altered peptide ligands (APLs) with established affinity for the N3.L2 TCR (22). Here, we applied this system to compare the kinetic requirements for nTreg cell selection with those of Tconv cells bearing the same TCR. No nTreg cells with high levels of the N3.L2 TCR normally develop in transgenic mice in the absence of APLs. Current models predicted that one or more APLs should provide a TCR signal of sufficient potency to induce Foxp3 expression. We found that no APL promoted N3.L2 nTreg cell development in vivo. However, when we allowed T cell development in neonatal thymic organ culture before ligand exposure, a small N3.L2 precursor population that expressed Foxp3 was uncovered. Only peptides with agonist activity generated nTreg cells, and these culture conditions led to negative selection of most Tconv cells. The development of nTreg cells in organ culture was a saturable process restricted to developing thymocytes that did not depend upon TGFβ but was enhanced by TGFβ signaling. Our results identify a multi-step developmental process where nTreg precursors are subjected to positive and negative selection independent of agonist-mediated induction of Foxp3. The nTreg TCR repertoire is therefore shaped by both high affinity and low affinity interactions that occur prior to the development of nTreg cell effector function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice
The transgenic mice that express the N3.L2 TCR, the Hb(64-76) peptide or APL under control of the Eα promoter, or the sHEL/Hb construct were previously described (22, 23). Briefly, the N3.L2 TCR recognizes Hb(64-76)/I-Ek or its APLs with varying affinity. CCSP/Hb mice express a chimeric membrane protein containing both hen egg lysozyme (HEL) and hemoglobin (Hb) epitopes under the control of a 2.4 kb fragment of the Clara cell secretory protein (CCSP) promoter. This transgene is expressed in type II pneumocytes as well as in the thymus. When CCSP HEL/Hb mice are crossed with N3.L2 TCR transgenic mice, the lungs of bigenic mice develop peribronchial infiltrates and interstitial pneumonitis (manuscript in preparation).
N3.L2 mice were mated to the appropriate ligand-expressing mice to generate bigenic N3.L2 × Hb crosses that were heterozygote for each transgene. All mice were housed in the animal facility at the Medical College of Wisconsin and handled in accordance with the institutional guidelines.
Flow cytometry
Depending on the yield, single cell suspensions of up to 5 × 106 cells/sample were placed in polypropylene culture tubes (12 × 75 mm; VWR, West Chester, PA) and washed with 3 ml of FACS buffer (PBS supplemented with 0.5% BSA and 0.1% NaN3). Each sample was subsequently stained using the following protocol. Cells were treated at room temperature for 10 minutes with 0.5 μg Fc block/1 × 106 cells in 100 μl of FACS buffer, then incubated for 30 minutes on ice after adding another 100 μl of FACS buffer containing 0.1 μg/5 × 106 cells of biotinylated or directly labeled antibodies. Cells were washed with FACS buffer and incubated on ice for 20 minutes with a streptavidin-fluorochrome conjugate where appropriate. Cells were washed again, and fixed in PBS-azide (0.1%) plus 1% paraformaldehyde for analysis. For intracellular Foxp3 staining, fixed samples were washed in 1 ml of PBS then permeabilized with two washes in FACS buffer containing 0.1% Triton X-100, which was also used to carry out similar FcR blocking, primary antibody staining and two subsequent washes before resuspension in the fixative. Data were acquired using the LSR-II flow cytometer with FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences), then analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc.).
Peptides and Cytokines
The peptides were synthesized, purified and analyzed, as previously described (24). The peptide sequences, in single-letter amino acid code, are: GKKVITAFNEGLK (N72(wild-type)); GKKVITAFTEGLK (T72); GKKVITAFIEGLK (I72). TGFβ was acquired from R&D Systems.
Antibodies
The antibodies used were Pacific Blue-conjugated anti-mouse CD4 (Caltag); Allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-mouse CD5 (BD PharMingen); Pacific Orange-conjugated anti-mouse CD8a (Caltag); PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD24 (BD PharMingen); PE-TexasRed-conjugated anti-mouse CD62L (Caltag); PE-TexasRed-conjugated anti-mouse CD69 (Caltag); Allophycocyanin- or PE-conjugated anti-mouse TCRβ (BD PharMingen); FITC-conjugated anti-mouse Foxp3 (eBiosciences); Fc block (BD PharMingen); and biotinylated CAb. Cells stained with CAb were subsequently stained with Tricolor streptavidin (BD PharMingen).
Thymic organ culture
Fetal (E16.5), neonatal (1-day old) or reaggregated thymic lobes were each similarly incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for three to seven days on a 0.8-μm filter (Whatman) that was resting on a gelfoam sponge (Pfizer Inc.) in a well of a 12-well plate containing 1 ml RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS (Hyclone), 2 mM Glutamax (Invitrogen), 50 μg/ml gentamicin (Invitrogen), 100 U/ml penicillin (Invitrogen), and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). Any peptide and/or cytokine treatments were included throughout the course of the experiment, while media was exchanged after four days for longer cultures. Single-cell suspensions were then prepared for analysis. For reaggregated samples, neonatal lobes were digested at 37°C for 45 minutes in 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen), washed once with media, then resuspended in 4 μl of media to form a slurry that was applied as a droplet on the filter. Reaggregates were either composed of individually reconstituted neonatal thymi or of 2-3 neonatal thymic lobes mixed together with 5 × 106 thymocytes or 1 × 105 peripheral lymphocytes from an adult N3.L2 × Rag-/- mouse.
Statistics
Two-tailed Student’s t-tests were used to determine significance between two given groups. For analyses containing more than two groups, one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test were applied.
RESULTS
nTreg Cells in N3.L2 × Ligand Mice
We used the N3.L2 system to study the in vivo development of peptide-specific nTreg cells over a wide range of ligand affinities. Based on current models, we postulated that N3.L2 T cells could become nTreg cells if provided a ligand of appropriate affinity in the thymus. Developing thymocytes from N3.L2 mice that coexpressed either the wild-type Hb(64-76) peptide or one of several well characterized APLs (Table I) that span a broad spectrum of affinities were analyzed using flow cytometry (22, 25, 26). The APLs involved amino acid substitutions at position 72, the TCR contact residue in the middle of the peptide/MHC complex (P5 position). Individual substitutions replaced asparagine (N72) to form a weak agonist (T72), a strong antagonist (I72), a moderate antagonist (A72), a null ligand with charge conservation (Q72), or a null ligand with an opposite charge (E72). All Hb(64-76)-related epitopes were expressed as chimeric membrane proteins to target the MHC class II antigen presenting pathway (22).
TABLES I.
A Comparison of APLs
Analysis of CD4+CD8− (CD4SP) thymocytes in N3.L2 mice may be subdivided into cell populations based on the amount of the transgenic TCR on the cell surface, as determined by the level of staining with a clonotypic antibody (CAbneg, CAbint, CAbhigh). CAb is specific for the unique combination of the transgenic TCRα and TCRβ chains together (27). As CD4SP thymocytes all express a similarly high level of TCRs (data not shown), the amount of CAb staining within the CD4SP-CAbint gate is inversely related to the quantity of endogenous TCRα chains on the cell surface. Flow cytometric analysis of non-transgenic TCRα chains confirms their presence on CD4SP-CAbint thymocytes (manuscript in preparation). Consequently, the CD4SP-CAbint population consists of dual-receptor thymocytes. CAbhighFoxp3+ cells do not exist in N3.L2 mice on either the B6.AKR or the Rag-/- backgrounds (Figure 1A), which is consistent with other models (3, 18). The Eα promoter drives transgene expression in both the cortex and medulla, including the APC populations necessary for the positive and negative selection of Tconv cells (22). Based on published studies, we predicted that expression of the cognate antigen N72 in the thymus of N3.L2 mice would result in the development of nTreg cells with high levels of the transgenic TCR (18). However, when N72 was expressed under the control of the Eα promoter, all single-receptor CD4SP CAbhigh cells were deleted, regardless of their Foxp3 status (Figure 1B). There were several possibilities that could explain these results: 1) the distribution of ligand expression among the various APC populations did not permit N3.L2 nTreg cells to develop, 2) the interaction between the N72 ligand and the N3.L2 TCR may exceed the affinity threshold for nTreg cell development, 3) early exposure of N3.L2 thymocytes to the cognate antigen might result in their elimination via negative selection, and 4) the N3.L2 TCR might not be compatible with nTreg cell development. We designed experiments to investigate these possibilities.
FIGURE 1.
APLs Fail to Promote N3.L2 nTreg Cell Development In Vivo.
A) Left: CD4 versus CD8 staining of adult N3.L2 thymocytes with the gate and number showing the CD4SP population as a percent of live cells. Right: Foxp3 versus CAb staining of CD4SP thymocytes isolated from adult N3.L2 mice or N3.L2 × Rag-/- mice. Gating strategy shows cell populations in terms of Foxp3 and CAb level (CAbneg, CAbint, CAbhigh). Numbers above the CAbhigh gates indicate CAbhighFoxp3+ cells as a percent of the CD4SP gate, while the upper left number indicates CD4SP cells as a percent of live cells.
B) Similar analysis as in A, of mice that coexpress the N3.L2 TCR with its cognate antigen under control of the indicated promoters.
C) Absolute numbers of thymic cells (mean + SE). Single-letters denote the amino acid at position 72 of the cognate antigen (N) or APL (T, I, A, Q, E) in N3.L2 × Hb mice.
D) Similar analysis as in A, on the same mice as in C.
E) Percent and absolute number of Foxp3+ cells (mean + SE) in the CD4SP gate of the same mice as in C. Data are shown as total amounts and in terms of CAb level.
These results are representative of three to seven independent experiments with a total of four to nine mice per group. Asterisks indicate a significant difference when compared to N3.L2 control values. *: p ≤ 0.05, **: p ≤ 0.01, ***: p ≤ 0.001.
In other systems, ‘tissue specific’ promoters have been used to direct antigen expression, resulting in the negative selection of Tconv cells together with the development of nTreg cells (18, 28, 29). This result may be due to low-level ligand expression that is limited to certain thymic APC subsets, such as medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs) (30). We used the CCSP promoter to drive expression of the ligand in transgenic mice (CCSP/N72). In these mice, expression of the transgene was detectable by RT-PCR only in lung tissue (data not shown). However, CAbhigh Tconv cells were deleted in N3.L2 × CCSP/N72 mice, demonstrating low-level thymic expression. In contrast to other models that used a similar strategy (29), CAbhigh nTreg cells were not detected (Figure 1B). We also examined sHEL/N72 mice that co-expressed a secreted form of the antigen under the control of a minimal thymidine kinase promoter (23). In these mice, the antigen circulates at a concentration of ≤0.1 ng/ml, which is sufficient to induce the negative selection of CAbhigh Tconv cells in N3.L2 × sHEL/N72 mice (Figure 1B). Despite low level thymic expression and the different route of antigen delivery, no CAbhigh nTreg cells were produced.
If the clonal deletion of all CAbhigh cells was a result of inappropriately strong avidity engagements during development, then attenuating the TCR signaling by introducing APLs of lower affinity could provide a thymic environment in which negative selection of these cells is limited to the Tconv subset. To examine this possibility, we crossed N3.L2 mice with a broad spectrum of APL mice and examined nTreg and Tconv cells in the thymus and periphery. The thymus size correlated with ligand affinity (Figure 1C), indicating progressively less negative selection with coexpression of the lower affinity ligands. However, no significant CAbhighFoxp3+ T cell development was observed in any N3.L2 × APL combination, including T72 and I72, which efficiently deleted CAbhigh N3.L2 Tconv cells (Figure 1D). Comparable results were observed in the lymph nodes of these mice (data not shown), confirming a lack of rare CAbhighFoxp3+ thymocytes that might later become evident by expanding in the periphery. Thus, reducing ligand affinity did not result in nTreg cell development.
The Influence of Ligand Affinity on nTreg Cell Selection
When considering all CD4SP thymocytes regardless of the CAb level, we found an increased proportion of Foxp3+ cells (Figure 1E, upper left panel) with coexpression of ligands that have high affinity for the N3.L2 TCR (N72, T72, I72). Among these ligands, the total number of nTreg cells was inversely related to the TCR-peptide-MHC half-life (25) (Figure 1E, lower left panel). In N3.L2 × N72 mice, the total number of nTreg cells was decreased, consistent with their negative selection. When T72 was coexpressed, the level of nTreg cells became comparable to that found in the N3.L2 controls. Notably, with I72 coexpression, the total number of nTreg cells was significantly higher. This increase in cell number was restricted to the CAbneg compartment. Since CAbneg cells express the N3.L2 TCRβ chain (Vβ8.3), they have some tendency toward Hb(64-76) peptide reactivity (unpublished data) and hence could be influenced by this ligand or its variants. In agreement with this interpretation, ligand-specific effects were not restricted to the Foxp3+ cell populations and were similar in CD4SP Foxp3− thymocytes (data not shown). Reversing the charge of the amino acid residue in the P5 position (E72) also influenced nTreg cell development, possibly reflecting a global influence on the development of N3.L2β+ thymocytes, as evidenced by the significant reductions in the CAbneg and CAbint populations (Figure 1E, lower middle panels).
Expression of APLs under the control of the Eα promoter results in both positive and negative selection of N3.L2 Tconv thymocytes, depending upon the affinity of the interaction (22). A priori, there is no reason why this should not also be true for the nTreg population. In this system of antigen delivery, high affinity interactions uniformly result in negative selection, which should occur even among cells with N72 reactivity derived by expression of the N3.L2 TCRβ chain combined with endogenous TCRα chains. Arguably, the increase in nTreg and Tconv cell numbers seen in N3.L2 × I72 mice might therefore be the result of positive selection based on lower affinity interactions.
In our study, intermediate N3.L2 TCR levels influenced both nTreg and Tconv cell development. Recent studies support the idea that nTreg cell lineage commitment begins prior to Foxp3 expression (15, 16). We considered this possibility by directly comparing the effects of TCR ligation on total and N3.L2 TCR levels between the nTreg and Tconv cell compartments. First, fold differences respective to N3.L2 control values for each N3.L2 × APL group (Figure 2A) were established, both in terms of the percent (upper panels) and the absolute number (lower panels) of cells within the CAbneg and CAbint gates. We then compared the Foxp3+ and Foxp3− populations in terms of those fold differences. In the CAbint gate, the magnitude of the fold increase in the proportion of Foxp3+ cells was significantly larger than those found for the Foxp3− population when N72, T72 or I72 was coexpressed. Both Foxp3+ and Foxp3− T cells underwent negative selection, as represented by their decreased numbers with higher affinity ligands. However, the extent of this deletion was significantly less for Foxp3+ thymocytes, which was consistent with their increased proportions. These data show the two lineages to be intrinsically different in terms of their responses to a given ligand and indicate that developing nTreg precursors are more resistant to negative selection than their Tconv counterparts.
FIGURE 2.
Foxp3+ Thymocytes are Less Sensitive to Both Positive and Negative Selection.
A) Fold differences (mean ± SE) in the percent of gate (upper panel) and absolute number (lower panel) of Foxp3− (grey bars) and Foxp3+ (black bars) thymocytes from the same mice as in Figure 1C, relative to respective N3.L2 control values.
B) Geometric mean fluorescence intensity (mean ± SE) as a measure of the level of TCRβ chains (upper panel) or of the N3.L2 TCR (lower panel) on the same CAbint cell population as in A. Dashed lines depict respective N3.L2 control values, which significantly differ for N3.L2 TCR levels (p ≤ 0.001), but not for TCRβ chain levels.
C) Similar analysis of N3.L2 TCR level as in B, but on peripheral lymphocytes.
D) Percent change in the ratio of CAbintFoxp3+ cells (peripheral vs. thymic, mean ± SE).
Asterisks indicate a significant difference between the Foxp3− and Foxp3+ bars (A-C) or when compared to N3.L2 control values (D). *: p ≤ 0.05, **: p ≤ 0.01, ***: p ≤ 0.001.
Interestingly, the pattern of positive fold differences in the proportion of CAbintFoxp3+ T cells at higher affinity was inverted at lower affinity (A72, Q72 and E72). These negative fold differences were accompanied by a significantly decreased number of CAbintFoxp3+ T cells at the lowest tested affinity (E72). In other words, in the presence of lower affinity ligands, forced expression of the N3.L2 transgenic TCR in the CAbint population resulted in more negative fold differences in the proportion (A: −1.19 vs. +1.02, Q: −1.08 vs. 1.01, E: −1.69 vs. 1.02) and number (A: 1.15 vs. 1.43, Q: −1.01 vs. 1.10, E: −1.57 vs. 1.10) of nTreg cells, when compared to their Foxp3− counterparts. This indicated that the endogenous TCR-dependent development of nTreg cells was more easily disrupted by the low-affinity interactions provided by the transgenic receptor compared to Tconv cells. Therefore, nTreg precursors may also be less sensitive to positive selection in that they require stronger signals to undergo this process. The CAbneg population confirmed the differential effects of affinity on the nTreg and Tconv cell populations (Figure 2A, left panel). These trends were also maintained in the periphery (data not shown).
One measure of a thymocyte’s capacity to initiate downstream signaling is the level of TCR on its cell surface (31). For dual-receptor T cells, such as in the CAbint gate, both TCRs can mediate signaling events, which may influence the outcome of thymocyte selection (32-34). In the CD4SP-CAbint gate, we used the geometric mean fluorescent intensity of anti-TCRβ and CAb staining as a measure of the overall TCR levels (Figure 2B, upper panel) and N3.L2 TCR levels (lower panel), respectively. When stronger ligands (N72, T72, or I72) were coexpressed, nTreg cells expressed lower levels of TCRβ compared to their Foxp3− counterparts, while the N3.L2 TCR levels on nTreg cells were proportionally higher. With lower affinity ligands (A72 or Q72), this bias was reversed in favor of endogenous receptors. The N3.L2 TCR may be expressed as early as the CD4−CD8−, double negative (DN) stage (data not shown), before positive and negative selection. Therefore, forced expression of the clonotypic receptor early in development has a differential effect on the regulatory and conventional populations, both in terms of the ultimate level of cell-surface TCR and the proportional composition of the transgenic and endogenous receptors.
In addition to influencing thymic development, the N3.L2/APL system creates distinct antigenic environments that impact the peripheral survival of T cells expressing the transgenic TCR. In the lymph nodes, across the spectrum of affinities, the level of CAb staining on CAbintFoxp3+ T cells was generally higher than that found on CAbintFoxp3− T cells (Figure 2C). This preferential expression of the N3.L2 TCR in the nTreg population suggested that their affinity requirement for homeostatic survival, which is mediated by continuous TCR ligation (35), is intrinsically different from that of the Tconv population. The relative ‘fitness’ of any T cell subset in a given population can be measured by changes in its proportional representation in that population over time, such as during the maturation process from the thymus to the periphery (36, 37). This comparison assumes that exposures of each population to commensal organisms and other factors that influence T cell homeostasis are identical within each mouse. Therefore, the effect of self-ligand affinity on nTreg cell fitness may be measured by comparing the nTreg:Tconv peripheral ratio to its respective thymic ratio within the CAbint gate of each N3.L2 × APL bigenic mouse. Under normal circumstances, nTreg cells comprise a greater proportion of CD4+ T cells in the periphery than in the thymus. However, in N3.L2 × N72 or T72 bigenic mice, the ratio of CAbint nTreg cells to CAbint Tconv cells in the periphery was smaller than its respective thymic value (Figure 2D). These peripheral versus thymic ratios did not differ from control values when lower affinity ligands were coexpressed. These data indicate that the nTreg and Tconv cells respond differently to an agonist self-peptide in the periphery. Although the overall numbers were lower relative to control mice, the agonist environment favors the Tconv subset over the nTreg cells. This was the opposite of what was observed in the thymus and supports the notion that nTreg cells have relatively blunted responses compared to their Foxp3− counterparts.
nTreg Cell Development in Thymic Organ Culture
In the instructive model (16, 38), any developing thymocyte may be directed into the nTreg lineage upon an appropriate TCR-peptide-MHC interaction. Indeed, the TCR repertoires of nTreg and Tconv cells have some degree of overlap (39-42). It was therefore conceivable that CAbhigh thymocytes in our system could upregulate Foxp3 if grown under permissive conditions. Factors that influence the selection of T cell precursors include the dose and timing of ligand presentation (43-50), which may be manipulated in organ culture systems. We investigated the effect of presenting the wild-type ligand to N3.L2 thymocytes at different stages of their development using fetal thymic organ culture (FTOC) and neonatal thymic organ culture (NTOC).
After FTOC of E16.5 thymi treated with 1μM N72 peptide, deletion of the CD4SP compartment was virtually complete. Of the few CD4SP cells that matured (Figure 3A), about two percent upregulated Foxp3. We also observed a ligand specific effect within the DN population, which showed a significant increase in both the proportion and number of Foxp3+ cells (Figure 3B). Although the proportion of Foxp3+ cells also increased in the other thymic subsets, the total number of these cells was not significantly different from control values. To allow more N3.L2 thymocytes to mature before peptide exposure, thymic lobes were harvested on the day of birth for NTOC. In contrast to FTOC, the neonatal thymi showed no significant reduction of the CD4SP compartment and significantly more CD4SP-CAbhighFoxp3+ cells were generated (Figure 3C, 27 vs. 1.82 × 103, p=0.0058). Notably, the proportions of CD4SP nTreg cells in the N3.L2 thymi closely matched those found in the B6.AKR thymi (Figure 3D, ~5% of the gate). Even when the system was biased toward one specific TCR-peptide interaction, the proportion of developing nTreg cells was still limited. Harvesting neonatal thymi three days after birth had no effect on nTreg cell yield (data not shown).
FIGURE 3.
N3.L2 nTreg Precursors are Largely Deleted in FTOC, while Mature N3.L2 nTreg Cells are Generated in NTOC.
A and B) FTOC of E16.5 B6.AKR and N3.L2 fetuses for seven days either in the presence (grey bars) or absence (white bars) of 1 μM N72. A) CD4 versus CD8 staining, or Foxp3 versus CAb staining, of live or CD4SP thymocytes, respectively. Numbers indicate the percent of the parent gate. B) Percent and absolute number of Foxp3+ cells (mean + SE) in each respective gate (CD4−CD8−, DN; CD4+CD8+, DP; CD4+CD8−, 4SP; and CD4−CD8+, 8SP). These results are representative of four independent experiments with a total of 6-10 data points (12-17 lobes) per group. Asterisks indicate a significant difference in peptide- versus untreated samples.
C and D) Similar treatments and analyses as in A and B, respectively, but after NTOC of 1-day-old neonates for six days (±12 hours). These results are representative of 4-8 independent experiments with a total of 9-19 data points (14-34 lobes) per group.
*: p ≤ 0.05, **: p ≤ 0.01, ***: p ≤ 0.001.
In order to determine the relationship between peptide concentration and N3.L2 nTreg cell development, we performed NTOCs with N72 peptide treatments ranging from 0.01 μM to 10 μM. While the overall thymocyte yield was not significantly affected by the peptide dose (data not shown), the distribution of thymic subsets was changed as the peptide concentration increased (Figure 4A). The CD4+CD8+, double positive (DP) compartment was significantly depleted, which was accompanied by a significant increase in CD4−CD8+ (CD8SP) cells. These observations are consistent with previous data (51, 52). Although the size of the CD4SP compartment remained unchanged, the proportion and number of Foxp3+ cells increased in direct relation to the N72 peptide dose and reached a maximum at a concentration of 1 μM (Figure 4B). Significant increases in the DP-Foxp3+ proportions were also observed. NTOC with T72 peptide (weak agonist) treatment also induced Foxp3 expression, although it was markedly lower. In contrast, the antagonist I72 peptide, which is sufficient to induce negative selection of Tconv cells (Figure 1D, (22, 51)), did not result in the upregulation of Foxp3 (Figure 4C).
FIGURE 4.
An Agonist is Required to Induce Foxp3 Expression.
A) Dot plots show CD4 versus CD8 staining of thymocytes isolated from N3.L2 thymi treated with 0 μM-10 μM N72 peptide in NTOC. Numbers indicate the percent of live cells. Bar graphs depict each thymic subset (DN, white; DP, black; 4SP, striped; 8SP, grey) as a percent (mean + SE) of live cells.
B) Percent (left panel) and absolute number (right panel) of Foxp3+ cells (mean ± SE) in each respective gate (DN, open triangle; DP, open circle; 4SP, closed circle; and 8SP, closed triangle), from the same samples as in A.
C) Foxp3 versus CAb staining of CD4SP thymocytes isolated from N3.L2 thymi treated with 10 μM T72 peptide (left panel) or 10 μM I72 peptide (right panel) in NTOC. Numbers indicate CAbhighFoxp3+ cells as a percent of the CD4SP gate.
These results are representative of 2-8 independent experiments with a total of 2-19 data points (5-34 lobes) per group. Asterisks indicate a significant difference in peptide- versus untreated samples. *: p ≤ 0.05, **: p ≤ 0.01, ***: p ≤ 0.001.
Mature T cells may be induced to express Foxp3 upon TCR stimulation in the presence of TGFβ (53). To explore whether or not the Foxp3+ cells generated during NTOC were being converted from CD4SP-Foxp3− cells that were already present at birth, we set up similar cultures with or without 5 ng/ml TGFβ and analyzed the results after three or six days. While TGFβ treatment had no effect on the overall thymus size (data not shown), the numbers of CD4SP cells significantly increased after six days of culture (Figure 5A, right panel). Within this gate, TGFβ enhanced the percent and number of Foxp3+ cells (Figure 5B). This TGFβ-mediated, selective increase in Foxp3+ cells was also seen in all N3.L2 thymic subsets (data not shown). While conversion of Foxp3− cells should have been noticeable after three days, we employed reaggregate thymic organ culture (RTOC) techniques to rule out any contribution by conversion to the enhancement of Foxp3+ cells seen after six days of culture. The generation of clonotypic nTreg cells may be recapitulated using RTOC when N3.L2 × Rag-/- thymocytes are introduced into a neonatal B6.AKR thymic environment in the presence of 1 μM N72 peptide (Figure 5C, second panel). However, incorporating mature lymphocytes in parallel RTOC experiments failed to show conversion regardless of TGFβ treatment (Figure 5C, right two panels). These data collectively showed that thymic APCs do not mediate conversion of mature Tconv cells and that TGFβ enhanced nTreg cell recovery without inducing Foxp3 expression in mature CD4+ cells.
FIGURE 5.
N3.L2 nTreg Cell Development in Thymic Organ Culture Occurs de novo.
A) Percent (left panel) of live cells and absolute number (right panel) of CD4SP cells (mean ± SE) isolated from the indicated thymi treated with 1 μM N72 peptide in the presence (black circles) or absence (white circles) of 5 ng/ml TGFβ after NTOC for three or six days. These results are representative of 3-8 independent experiments with a total of 4-14 data points (5-19 lobes) per group.
B) Percent (left panel) and absolute number (right panel) of Foxp3+ cells (mean ± SE) in the CD4SP gate, from the same thymi as in A.
C) Foxp3 versus CAb staining of CD4SP/CD4+ cells isolated from RTOC. Thymocytes (left panels) or peripheral lymphocytes (right panels) from adult N3.L2 × Rag-/- mice were reaggregated with neonatal B6.AKR thymi and cultured under the indicated conditions. Numbers in each quadrant represent the respective percent of the parent gate. These results are representative of three independent experiments with a total of three samples per group.
Asterisks indicate a significant difference in TGFβ-treated samples versus those treated with 1 μM N72 peptide alone. *: p ≤ 0.05, **: p ≤ 0.01, ***: p ≤ 0.001.
In the RTOC experiments, we observed an increased proportion of Foxp3+ cells in both the wild-type and transgenic CD4SP gates. This suggested that disrupting the thymic architecture might enhance nTreg cell development by increasing access to mTECs or other appropriate APCs (30). Next, we examined the effect of reaggregation per se on nTreg cell development by trypsinizing and reconstituting individual neonatal thymi before culturing for six days. The results were compared to those obtained in NTOC. The total recovery of thymocytes after RTOC was significantly reduced (Figure 6A). This was predominately due to depletion of the DP subset (Figure 6B). The yield of cells in the other subsets was not affected, except for the CD8SP cells in N3.L2 mice. When we considered only those cells that expressed Foxp3, B6.AKR cultures showed a significant increase in the proportion of these cells while they also trended toward an increase in their total numbers (Figure 6C). This was not the case for the N3.L2 thymi. In B6.AKR thymi, the percent and number of Foxp3+ cells in all thymic subsets increased, reaching significance in both the DN and DP gates. DN-Foxp3+ thymocytes were detectable only at the DN4 (CD25−CD44−) stage of development (data not shown). In N3.L2 thymi, peptide-induced Foxp3 expression in the DN population was not apparent in either NTOC or RTOC. Early expression of the N3.L2 TCR bypasses normal β-selection, resulting in fewer DN2 (CD25+CD44+) and DN3 (CD25+CD44−) thymocytes and an abnormal population of DN4 cells that are reportedly inefficient at this process (27). Transgenic TCR-mediated β-selection may therefore limit the number of DN4 T cells capable of Foxp3 expression.
FIGURE 6.
Disrupting the Thymic Architecture Potentiates Foxp3 Expression in Less Mature Thymic Subsets.
A) Absolute numbers of cells (mean + SE) recovered from B6.AKR or N3.L2 thymi after NTOC (white bars) or RTOC (black bars) in which each lobe was individually trypsinized and reconstituted. All samples were treated with 1 μM N72 peptide and cultured for six days.
B) Percent (left panels) of live cells and absolute number (right panels) of cells (mean + SE) in the indicated thymic subsets, from the same thymi as in A.
C) Percent (left panels) and absolute number (right panels) of Foxp3+ cells (mean + SE) in the indicated gates, from the same thymi as in A.
D) Analysis of TCRβ, CD5, CD24, CD62L and CD69 expression on Foxp3− (filled grey) and Foxp3+ (black line) cells in the DN4, DP and 4SP gates from the same RTOC samples as in A.
Asterisks indicate a significant difference in the values derived after NTOC versus RTOC (A-C) or between Foxp3− and Foxp3+ populations (D). These results are representative of 2-8 independent experiments with a total of 4-19 data points (4-34 lobes) per group. *: p ≤ 0.05, **: p ≤ 0.01, ***: p ≤ 0.001.
To further dissect out the differences between the nTreg and Tconv populations derived from RTOC, we examined a series of phenotypic markers (TCRβ, CD5, CD24, CD62L, and CD69) at the various stages of thymocyte development (Figure 6D). Most differential expression of these molecules was observed within the DP gate. The DP-Foxp3+ cells in both B6.AKR and N3.L2 mice followed a similar phenotypic pattern, which generally expressed higher levels of TCRβ, CD62L, CD69, and lower levels of CD24 when compared to their Foxp3− counterparts. These data are consistent with TCR signaling in DP-Foxp3+ cells. In contrast, the relative TCRβ levels on Foxp3+ cells within the less mature thymic subsets (DN4 and DP) of B6.AKR mice were consistently higher. This trend was reversed among CD4SP cells where the nTreg cells expressed lower levels of TCRβ when compared to their Tconv counterparts. Thus, in reaggregate cultures, Foxp3 expression could be induced at the DN4 stage. These data suggested that nTreg precursors may be capable of Foxp3 induction much earlier than expected and that the normal thymic architecture plays a role in controlling access of developing thymocytes to the relevant APC population(s). Even under the permissive reaggregate culture conditions, only about 10% of CD4SP cells expressed Foxp3. These data further support the conclusion that nTreg cells make up a distinct lineage that differs from the Tconv lineage and that nTreg precursors are competent to express Foxp3 immediately following β-selection.
DISCUSSION
The central findings of this study are that nTreg precursors undergo affinity-based selection independent of the induction of Foxp3, and that the affinity requirements for these selection processes appear to be different than those of Tconv precursors. Several other factors play a role in determining the outcome of nTreg precursor selection, such as the potency of the selecting ligand, the developmental stage at which the ligand is presented and possibly the type of APC (54). Higher affinity interactions per se provide no guarantee of nTreg cell development, as ligands capable of negatively selecting Tconv cells failed to promote Foxp3 expression. Only those ligands capable of activating mature T cells (complete agonist) induced Foxp3. If such interactions occur too early, possibly with an inappropriate APC, nTreg precursors are eliminated before being allowed to mature. Thus, proper timing of nTreg cell selection events is important and likely to be influenced by the structural organization of the thymus. Disrupting the thymic architecture to allow early exposure to the appropriate APC and adding TGFβ increased nTreg cell precursor development.
Mature clonotypehigh nTreg cells did not develop in the N3.L2 system unless presented with their cognate antigen postnatally. However, analysis of CAbint thymocytes allowed for a direct comparison of Tconv and nTreg populations that expressed a common TCR. With coexpression of a variety of APLs, we observed selective differences between CAbint Foxp3− and CAbint Foxp3+ cells titrated over a broad range of TCR-ligand affinity. While the degree to which each individual TCR contributes to the net intracellular signaling in these dual-receptor thymocytes remains uncertain, the ligand-specific effects clearly demonstrate that even intermediate levels of the transgenic TCR can play a role in the selection process. We found that negatively selecting thymic environments resulted in a deletion of CAbint nTreg cells that was much less extensive relative to CAbint Tconv cells by as much as five-fold, despite the former expressing significantly higher levels of the N3.L2 TCR on the cell surface. The extent of negative selection also directly correlated with TCR-ligand affinity. These results confirmed that negative selection of nTreg precursors shapes the nTreg cell repertoire (55), and demonstrated that the nTreg lineage is less sensitive to negative selection when compared to Tconv cells. Furthermore, the bias towards the N3.L2 TCR on CAbint nTreg cells seen in the presence of high-affinity ligands implicates differences in TCR-mediated signal transduction as a potential mechanism.
Proportional increases of the CAbneg population are intuitive with coexpression of higher affinity ligands (N72, T72, or I72), which resulted in the preferential deletion of competing CAbint and CAbhigh thymocytes that bear the transgenic TCR. In bigenic mice, the number of CAbneg cells should remain relatively constant if it were only a matter of avoiding cell death. However, significant increases in the number of thymocytes in the CAbneg gate occurred in N3.L2 × T72 and N3.L2 × I72 mice. One possible explanation is that the deletion of other thymocytes leaves more space in the thymus for CAbneg cells to expand, irrespective of Foxp3 status. Supporting this interpretation were the similarly patterned trends found in the percent and absolute number of CAbneg Foxp3+ cells compared to their Foxp3− counterparts among the N3.L2 × APL mice.
However, other factors aside from increased thymic vacancy must also play a role since the number of CAbneg thymocytes in N3.L2 × N72 mice was significantly reduced. Several studies have supported the idea of a bi-directional interaction between the thymic stroma and T cell precursors, which may be needed for appropriate development and organization of the thymic microenvironment (56-63). This ‘crosstalk’ may be lacking or altered in the situation where early expression of the transgenic TCR and the cognate antigen results in poor thymic development that does not as readily accommodate even those cells with few or no transgenic receptors. The production of IL-7, an important cytokine that promotes the proliferation, differentiation and survival of thymocytes may also be compromised as the localization and regulation of IL-7-expressing thymic epithelial cells is affected when thymocyte development is arrested at various stages (64). Thus, the proportion of Foxp3+ cells in particular might be negatively impacted due to significant reductions in the DP compartment (data not shown), which may regulate in trans the tendency of early TCR-αβ+ progenitors to differentiate into nTreg cells (65).
In N3.L2 mice, allelic exclusion restricts many CAbneg cells to expression of the transgenic TCRβ chain (Vβ8.3), which when paired with endogenous TCRα chains confers a bias toward Hb(64-76) reactivity. Transgenic coexpression of Hb(64-76) under control of the Eα promoter results in the negative selection of developing thymocytes that bind to this ligand with high affinity, including those within the CAbneg gate. The observation that I72 coexpression enhanced the absolute number of CAbneg cells implies a direct and positive influence of this peptide on developing thymocytes. Indeed, the inability of the I72 peptide treatment to promote N3.L2 nTreg development in NTOC argues that the endogenous TCRα chains or pre-TCRα on Vβ8.3+ cells provided something that the N3.L2 TCRα chain did not. For example, an endogenous TCRα chain could allow for a TCR-MHC complex with a binding affinity that is more appropriate for nTreg cell maturation. In this scenario, the I72 ligand would interact weakly with Hb(64-76) reactive thymocytes and mediate positive selection. Foxp3 expression might then be driven later in development by different endogenous self-ligands that bind with high affinity.
After positive and negative selection, nTreg cells must interact with an agonist ligand to induce Foxp3 expression. How then does negative selection differ from induction of nTreg effector function? One of several considerations is that the range of TCR-peptide-MHC affinities that induce negative selection may include ligands with no agonist property, as seen in the Tconv population (22). Another difference is the developmental stage and location where each process occurs. Although nTreg cell precursors may be competent to express Foxp3 shortly after β-selection, they are normally restrained by the structural organization of the thymus. This organization enforces sequential developmental steps, implying that for nTreg cells, the subset of self-ligands mediating negative selection and Foxp3 expression might be distinct. Similarly, different APCs may mediate each process. Evidence suggests that dendritic cells are predominately involved in negative selection while mTECs are sufficient for Foxp3 induction, although other APC populations may be involved (30, 54). In contrast, when mTECs present high affinity ligands to Tconv cells, the outcome is negative selection and tolerance (66, 67). Thus, mTECs may enforce tolerance both by inducing Foxp3 in nTreg cells and deleting Tconv cells that respond to the same self-antigen. This ability of a single APC type to differentially affect developing thymocytes that share antigen-specificity implies that there are lineage differences between Treg and Tconv precursors that are TCR-independent. The resultant thymic TCR repertoires of mature nTreg and Tconv cells have a limited overlap, supporting this interpretation (42).
Previous data suggested that nTreg cell lineage specification was synonymous with positive selection and occurred as a single step driven by high affinity TCR-MHC interactions resulting in Foxp3 expression (68). The affinity threshold appropriate for Foxp3 induction was believed to lie between that required for the positive and negative selection of Tconv thymocytes (18-21). Thus every developing thymocyte, given a TCR signal of appropriate strength, could become a nTreg cell. The available pool of self-ligands largely determines the size and TCR composition of the nTreg repertoire. More recent data suggests that nTreg cell lineage commitment lies upstream of Foxp3 (15, 16). The organ culture data in this report supports the latter hypothesis. In NTOC, development of N3.L2 nTreg cells by the addition of peptide was a saturable process in which only a fraction of cells with the transgenic TCR expressed Foxp3. Addition of TGFβ only improved nTreg cell recovery two-fold to about 10% of surviving cells, consistent with other reports demonstrating that TGFβ signaling contributes to nTreg cell development in a subset of thymocytes (69, 70).
Together, these data support a multi-step model of nTreg cell differentiation involving a numerically limited nTreg cell lineage with reduced or modified TCR signaling potential that proceeds through affinity-based positive and negative selection, followed by agonist-mediated induction of nTreg effector function. The result is an MHC-restricted nTreg cell repertoire with a high level of reactivity to a subset of self-antigens and tolerant to many others.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Paul Allen for the gift of the N3.L2 mice. We thank Talal Chatila, Paul Allen and Jack Routes for critical reading of the manuscript.
Footnotes
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 AI47154), the D.B. and Marjorie Reinhart, Nickolett and Montgomery Family Foundations, the Children’s Research Institute, and the Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin Program.
- APL
- altered peptide ligand
- CAb
- clonotypic antibody
- CCSP
- Clara cell secretory protein
- CD4SP
- CD4+CD8−
- CD8SP
- CD4−CD8+
- DN
- CD4−CD8−
- DP
- CD4+CD8+
- FTOC
- fetal thymic organ culture
- Hb
- hemoglobin
- HEL
- hen egg lysozyme
- mTEC
- medullary thymic epithelial cell
- NTOC
- neonatal thymic organ culture
- nTreg
- natural regulatory T
- RTOC
- reaggregate thymic organ culture
- Tconv
- conventional T
The authors have no conflicting financial interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sakaguchi S, Ono M, Setoguchi R, Yagi H, Hori S, Fehervari Z, Shimizu J, Takahashi T, Nomura T. Foxp3+ CD25+ CD4+ natural regulatory T cells in dominant self-tolerance and autoimmune disease. Immunol Rev. 2006;212:8–27. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00427.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Seddon B, Mason D. The third function of the thymus. Immunol Today. 2000;21:95–99. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5699(99)01559-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Itoh M, Takahashi T, Sakaguchi N, Kuniyasu Y, Shimizu J, Otsuka F, Sakaguchi S. Thymus and autoimmunity: production of CD25+CD4+ naturally anergic and suppressive T cells as a key function of the thymus in maintaining immunologic self-tolerance. J Immunol. 1999;162:5317–5326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M, Itoh M, Toda M. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J Immunol. 1995;155:1151–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chatila TA, Blaeser F, Ho N, Lederman HM, Voulgaropoulos C, Helms C, Bowcock AM. JM2, encoding a fork head-related protein, is mutated in X-linked autoimmunity-allergic disregulation syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:R75–81. doi: 10.1172/JCI11679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bennett CL, Christie J, Ramsdell F, Brunkow ME, Ferguson PJ, Whitesell L, Kelly TE, Saulsbury FT, Chance PF, Ochs HD. The immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) is caused by mutations of FOXP3. Nat Genet. 2001;27:20–21. doi: 10.1038/83713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brunkow ME, Jeffery EW, Hjerrild KA, Paeper B, Clark LB, Yasayko SA, Wilkinson JE, Galas D, Ziegler SF, Ramsdell F. Disruption of a new forkhead/winged-helix protein, scurfin, results in the fatal lymphoproliferative disorder of the scurfy mouse. Nat Genet. 2001;27:68–73. doi: 10.1038/83784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wildin RS, Ramsdell F, Peake J, Faravelli F, Casanova JL, Buist N, Levy-Lahad E, Mazzella M, Goulet O, Perroni L, Bricarelli FD, Byrne G, McEuen M, Proll S, Appleby M, Brunkow ME. X-linked neonatal diabetes mellitus, enteropathy and endocrinopathy syndrome is the human equivalent of mouse scurfy. Nat Genet. 2001;27:18–20. doi: 10.1038/83707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ochs HD, Ziegler SF, Torgerson TR. FOXP3 acts as a rheostat of the immune response. Immunol Rev. 2005;203:156–164. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00231.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wildin RS, Smyk-Pearson S, Filipovich AH. Clinical and molecular features of the immunodysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X linked (IPEX) syndrome. J Med Genet. 2002;39:537–545. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.8.537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Powell BR, Buist NR, Stenzel P. An X-linked syndrome of diarrhea, polyendocrinopathy, and fatal infection in infancy. J Pediatr. 1982;100:731–737. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80573-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zheng Y, Rudensky AY. Foxp3 in control of the regulatory T cell lineage. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:457–462. doi: 10.1038/ni1455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fontenot JD, Dooley JL, Farr AG, Rudensky AY. Developmental regulation of Foxp3 expression during ontogeny. J Exp Med. 2005;202:901–906. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fontenot JD, Rasmussen JP, Williams LM, Dooley JL, Farr AG, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cell lineage specification by the forkhead transcription factor foxp3. Immunity. 2005;22:329–341. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gavin MA, Rasmussen JP, Fontenot JD, Vasta V, Manganiello VC, Beavo JA, Rudensky AY. Foxp3-dependent programme of regulatory T-cell differentiation. Nature. 2007;445:771–775. doi: 10.1038/nature05543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lin W, Haribhai D, Relland LM, Truong N, Carlson MR, Williams CB, Chatila TA. Regulatory T cell development in the absence of functional Foxp3. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:359–368. doi: 10.1038/ni1445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wan YY, Flavell RA. Regulatory T-cell functions are subverted and converted owing to attenuated Foxp3 expression. Nature. 2007;445:766–770. doi: 10.1038/nature05479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jordan MS, Boesteanu A, Reed AJ, Petrone AL, Holenbeck AE, Lerman MA, Naji A, Caton AJ. Thymic selection of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells induced by an agonist self-peptide. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:301–306. doi: 10.1038/86302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Caton AJ, Cozzo C, Larkin J, 3rd, Lerman MA, Boesteanu A, Jordan MS. CD4(+) CD25(+) regulatory T cell selection. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1029:101–114. doi: 10.1196/annals.1309.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.D’Cruz LM, Klein L. Development and function of agonist-induced CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in the absence of interleukin 2 signaling. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:1152–1159. doi: 10.1038/ni1264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim JM, Rudensky A. The role of the transcription factor Foxp3 in the development of regulatory T cells. Immunol Rev. 2006;212:86–98. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00426.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Williams CB, Engle DL, Kersh GJ, White J. Michael, Allen PM. A kinetic threshold between negative and positive selection based on the longevity of the T cell receptor-ligand complex. J Exp Med. 1999;189:1531–1544. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.10.1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Haribhai D, Engle D, Meyer M, Donermeyer D, White JM, Williams CB. A threshold for central T cell tolerance to an inducible serum protein. J Immunol. 2003;170:3007–3014. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.6.3007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kersh GJ, Allen PM. Structural basis for T cell recognition of altered peptide ligands: a single T cell receptor can productively recognize a large continuum of related ligands. J Exp Med. 1996;184:1259–1268. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.4.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kersh GJ, Kersh EN, Fremont DH, Allen PM. High- and low-potency ligands with similar affinities for the TCR: the importance of kinetics in TCR signaling. Immunity. 1998;9:817–826. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80647-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Williams CB, Vidal K, Donermeyer D, Peterson DA, White JM, Allen PM. In vivo expression of a TCR antagonist: T cells escape central tolerance but are antagonized in the periphery. J Immunol. 1998;161:128–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kersh GJ, Donermeyer DL, Frederick KE, White JM, Hsu BL, Allen PM. TCR transgenic mice in which usage of transgenic alpha- and beta-chains is highly dependent on the level of selecting ligand. J Immunol. 1998;161:585–593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jordan MS, Riley MP, von Boehmer H, Caton AJ. Anergy and suppression regulate CD4(+) T cell responses to a self peptide. Eur J Immunol. 2000;30:136–144. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200001)30:1<136::AID-IMMU136>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lerman MA, Larkin J, 3rd, Cozzo C, Jordan MS, Caton AJ. CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cell repertoire formation in response to varying expression of a neoself-antigen. J Immunol. 2004;173:236–244. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.1.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Aschenbrenner K, D’Cruz LM, Vollmann EH, Hinterberger M, Emmerich J, Swee LK, Rolink A, Klein L. Selection of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells specific for self antigen expressed and presented by Aire+ medullary thymic epithelial cells. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:351–358. doi: 10.1038/ni1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Myers MD, Dragone LL, Weiss A. Src-like adaptor protein down-regulates T cell receptor (TCR)-CD3 expression by targeting TCRzeta for degradation. J Cell Biol. 2005;170:285–294. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200501164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Blichfeldt E, Munthe LA, Rotnes JS, Bogen B. Dual T cell receptor T cells have a decreased sensitivity to physiological ligands due to reduced density of each T cell receptor. Eur J Immunol. 1996;26:2876–2884. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830261211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Legrand N, Freitas AA. CD8+ T lymphocytes in double alpha beta TCR transgenic mice. II. Competitive fitness of dual alpha beta TCR CD8+ T lymphocytes in the peripheral pools. J Immunol. 2001;167:6158–6164. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.11.6158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dave VP, Allman D, Wiest DL, Kappes DJ. Limiting TCR expression leads to quantitative but not qualitative changes in thymic selection. J Immunol. 1999;162:5764–5774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kirberg J, Berns A, von Boehmer H. Peripheral T cell survival requires continual ligation of the T cell receptor to major histocompatibility complex-encoded molecules. J Exp Med. 1997;186:1269–1275. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.8.1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gett AV, Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A, Geginat J. T cell fitness determined by signal strength. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:355–360. doi: 10.1038/ni908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kieper WC, Burghardt JT, Surh CD. A role for TCR affinity in regulating naive T cell homeostasis. J Immunol. 2004;172:40–44. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.1.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Robey E, Fowlkes BJ. Selective events in T cell development. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12:675–705. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.003331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wong J, Obst R, Correia-Neves M, Losyev G, Mathis D, Benoist C. Adaptation of TCR repertoires to self-peptides in regulatory and nonregulatory CD4+ T cells. J Immunol. 2007;178:7032–7041. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pacholczyk R, Kern J, Singh N, Iwashima M, Kraj P, Ignatowicz L. Nonself-antigens are the cognate specificities of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Immunity. 2007;27:493–504. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pacholczyk R, Ignatowicz H, Kraj P, Ignatowicz L. Origin and T cell receptor diversity of Foxp3+CD4+CD25+ T cells. Immunity. 2006;25:249–259. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hsieh CS, Zheng Y, Liang Y, Fontenot JD, Rudensky AY. An intersection between the self-reactive regulatory and nonregulatory T cell receptor repertoires. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:401–410. doi: 10.1038/ni1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hogquist KA, Jameson SC, Heath WR, Howard JL, Bevan MJ, Carbone FR. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell. 1994;76:17–27. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90169-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pircher H, Rohrer UH, Moskophidis D, Zinkernagel RM, Hengartner H. Lower receptor avidity required for thymic clonal deletion than for effector T-cell function. Nature. 1991;351:482–485. doi: 10.1038/351482a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sebzda E, Wallace VA, Mayer J, Yeung RS, Mak TW, Ohashi PS. Positive and negative thymocyte selection induced by different concentrations of a single peptide. Science. 1994;263:1615–1618. doi: 10.1126/science.8128249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Vasquez NJ, Kaye J, Hedrick SM. In vivo and in vitro clonal deletion of double-positive thymocytes. J Exp Med. 1992;175:1307–1316. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.5.1307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yagi J, Janeway CA., Jr. Ligand thresholds at different stages of T cell development. Int Immunol. 1990;2:83–89. doi: 10.1093/intimm/2.1.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ashton-Rickardt PG, Bandeira A, Delaney JR, Van Kaer L, Pircher HP, Zinkernagel RM, Tonegawa S. Evidence for a differential avidity model of T cell selection in the thymus. Cell. 1994;76:651–663. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90505-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Page DM, Alexander J, Snoke K, Appella E, Sette A, Hedrick SM, Grey HM. Negative selection of CD4+ CD8+ thymocytes by T-cell receptor peptide antagonists. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:4057–4061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.9.4057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Peterson DA, DiPaolo RJ, Kanagawa O, Unanue ER. Cutting edge: negative selection of immature thymocytes by a few peptide-MHC complexes: differential sensitivity of immature and mature T cells. J Immunol. 1999;162:3117–3120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kersh GJ, Engle DL, Williams CB, Allen PM. Ligand-specific selection of MHC class II-restricted thymocytes in fetal thymic organ culture. J Immunol. 2000;164:5675–5682. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.11.5675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hogquist KA, Bonnevier JL. Development of peptide-selected CD8 T cells in fetal thymic organ culture occurs via the conventional pathway. J Immunol. 1998;161:3896–3901. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Becker C, Fantini MC, Neurath MF. TGF-beta as a T cell regulator in colitis and colon cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006;17:97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liston A, Nutsch KM, Farr AG, Lund JM, Rasmussen JP, Koni PA, Rudensky AY. Differentiation of regulatory Foxp3+ T cells in the thymic cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:11903–11908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801506105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kawahata K, Misaki Y, Yamauchi M, Tsunekawa S, Setoguchi K, Miyazaki J, Yamamoto K. Generation of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells from autoreactive T cells simultaneously with their negative selection in the thymus and from nonautoreactive T cells by endogenous TCR expression. J Immunol. 2002;168:4399–4405. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.9.4399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gray DH, Ueno T, Chidgey AP, Malin M, Goldberg GL, Takahama Y, Boyd RL. Controlling the thymic microenvironment. Curr Opin Immunol. 2005;17:137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2005.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.van Ewijk W, Hollander G, Terhorst C, Wang B. Stepwise development of thymic microenvironments in vivo is regulated by thymocyte subsets. Development. 2000;127:1583–1591. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.8.1583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.van Ewijk W, Wang B, Hollander G, Kawamoto H, Spanopoulou E, Itoi M, Amagai T, Jiang YF, Germeraad WT, Chen WF, Katsura Y. Thymic microenvironments, 3-D versus 2-D? Semin Immunol. 1999;11:57–64. doi: 10.1006/smim.1998.0158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Meilin A, Shoham J, Schreiber L, Sharabi Y. The role of thymocytes in regulating thymic epithelial cell growth and function. Scand J Immunol. 1995;42:185–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1995.tb03644.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hollander GA, Wang B, Nichogiannopoulou A, Platenburg PP, van Ewijk W, Burakoff SJ, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Terhorst C. Developmental control point in induction of thymic cortex regulated by a subpopulation of prothymocytes. Nature. 1995;373:350–353. doi: 10.1038/373350a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.van Ewijk W, Shores EW, Singer A. Crosstalk in the mouse thymus. Immunol Today. 1994;15:214–217. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(94)90246-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Palmer DB, Viney JL, Ritter MA, Hayday AC, Owen MJ. Expression of the alpha beta T-cell receptor is necessary for the generation of the thymic medulla. Dev Immunol. 1993;3:175–179. doi: 10.1155/1993/56290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Shores EW, Van Ewijk W, Singer A. Disorganization and restoration of thymic medullary epithelial cells in T cell receptor-negative scid mice: evidence that receptor-bearing lymphocytes influence maturation of the thymic microenvironment. Eur J Immunol. 1991;21:1657–1661. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830210711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zamisch M, Moore-Scott B, Su DM, Lucas PJ, Manley N, Richie ER. Ontogeny and regulation of IL-7-expressing thymic epithelial cells. J Immunol. 2005;174:60–67. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.1.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pennington DJ, Silva-Santos B, Silberzahn T, Escorcio-Correia M, Woodward MJ, Roberts SJ, Smith AL, Dyson PJ, Hayday AC. Early events in the thymus affect the balance of effector and regulatory T cells. Nature. 2006;444:1073–1077. doi: 10.1038/nature06051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Anderson MS, Venanzi ES, Chen Z, Berzins SP, Benoist C, Mathis D. The cellular mechanism of Aire control of T cell tolerance. Immunity. 2005;23:227–239. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Liston A, Lesage S, Wilson J, Peltonen L, Goodnow CC. Aire regulates negative selection of organ-specific T cells. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:350–354. doi: 10.1038/ni906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.von Boehmer H. Positive and negative selection in Basel. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:571–573. doi: 10.1038/ni0608-571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li MO, Flavell RA. Contextual regulation of inflammation: a duet by transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-10. Immunity. 2008;28:468–476. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.von Boehmer H, Nolting J. What turns on Foxp3? Nat Immunol. 2008;9:121–122. doi: 10.1038/ni0208-121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






