Table 2.
Empirical Genomic Scan Results Compared with Expectations under Estimated RHH Models for Drosophila
| Region Sizea | No. of markersb | Fraction Sweptc | E (fraction) | ∼20% Reductiond | E (fraction) | ∼50% Reductione | E (no. of sweeps | s = 1 × 10−2, 2Nλ=1 × 10−5)f,g | E (no. of sweeps | s = 2 × 10−3, 2Nλ = 2 × 10−4)g,h,i | E (no. of sweeps | s = 1 × 10−5, 2Nλ = 3 × 10−3)g,j |
| 256 kbk | 26 | 0.12 | 0.007 | 0.017 | ∼1 | ∼68 | ∼900 |
| 850 kbl | 28 | 0.07 | 0.007 | 0.017 | ∼3 | ∼225 | ∼3,060 |
| 17 Mbm | 105 | 0.12 | 0.007 | 0.017 | ∼61 | ∼4,620 | ∼61,200 |
Total length of the region spanned by the scan.
The number of scanned markers used in the study.
The fraction of scanned markers proposed by the authors to be linked to selective sweeps.
The expected fraction of markers that would fall in swept regions, for a ∼20% estimated reduction in variability (Andolfatto 2007; Macpherson et al. 2007).
The expected fraction of markers that would fall in swept regions, for a ∼50% estimated reduction in variability (Jensen, Thornton, and Andolfatto 2008; Li and Stephan 2006).
The expected number of sweeps that would fall in the sequenced regions within the last 0.1 4N generations, for parameters estimated by Macpherson et al. (2007) for D. simulans.
Only a fraction of this expected number may be identifiable, owing to the imperfect power of existing test statistics—see figure 2 (Przeworski 2002; Jensen, Thornton, and Aquadro 2008).
The expected number of sweeps that would fall in the sequenced regions within the last 0.1 4N generations, for parameters estimated by Jensen, Thornton, and Andolfatto (2008) for D. melanogaster
The expected number of sweeps that would fall in the sequenced regions within the last 0.1 4N generations, for parameters estimated by Li and Stephan (2006) for D. melanogaster.
The expected number of sweeps that would fall in the sequenced regions within the last 0.1 4N generations, for parameters estimated by Andolfatto (2007) for D. melanogaster.
From Bauer DuMont and Aquadro (2005); Jensen et al. (2007) for an X-linked region of D. melanogaster.
From Harr et al. (2002) for an X-linked region of D. melanogaster.
From Glinka et al. (2003) for an X-linked region of D. melanogaster.