Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 2009 May 19;157(6):984–993. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00192.x

In vitro and in vivo pharmacological role of TLQP-21, a VGF-derived peptide, in the regulation of rat gastric motor functions

C Severini 1, G La Corte 1, G Improta 2, M Broccardo 2, S Agostini 2, C Petrella 2, V Sibilia 3, F Pagani 3, F Guidobono 3, I Bulgarelli 4, GL Ferri 5, C Brancia 5, AM Rinaldi 6, A Levi 1, R Possenti 1,6
PMCID: PMC2737657  PMID: 19466987

Abstract

Background and purpose:

Vgf gene expression has been detected in various endocrine and neuronal cells in the gastrointestinal tract. In this study we investigated the pharmacological activity of different VGF-derived peptides. Among these, TLQP-21, corresponding to the 556–576 fragment of the protein was the unique active peptide, and its pharmacological profile was further studied.

Experimental approach:

The effects of TLQP-21 were examined in vitro by smooth muscle contraction in isolated preparations from the rat gastrointestinal tract and, in vivo, by assessing gastric emptying in rats. Rat stomach tissues were also processed for immunohistochemical and biochemical characterization.

Key results:

In rat longitudinal forestomach strips, TLQP-21 (100 nmol·L−1–10 µmol·L−1) concentration-dependently induced muscle contraction (in female rats, EC50 = 0.47 µmol·L−1, Emax: 85.7 ± 7.9 and in male rats, 0.87 µmol·L−1, Emax: 33.4 ± 5.3; n = 8), by release of prostaglandin (PG)E2 and PGF2a from the mucosal layer. This effect was significantly antagonized by indomethacin and selective inhibitors of either cyclooxygenase-1 (S560) or cyclooxygenase-2 (NS398). Immunostaining and biochemical studies confirmed the presence of VGF in the gastric neuronal cells. TLQP-21, injected i.c.v. (2–32 nmol per rat), significantly decreased gastric emptying by about 40%. This effect was significantly (P < 0.05) blocked by i.c.v. injection of indomethacin, suggesting that, also in vivo, this peptide acts in the brain stimulating PG release.

Conclusions and implications:

The present results demonstrate that this VGF-derived peptide plays a central and local role in the regulation of rat gastric motor functions.

Keywords: VGF-derived peptides, TLQP-21, prostaglandins, gastric activities

Introduction

The vgf gene encodes for VGF, a 617 amino acid precursor protein (Levi et al., 1985; Salton et al., 1991) with a tissue-specific pattern of expression limited to neurons in the central and peripheral nervous systems and to specific populations of endocrine cells (Salton, 1991; Ferri et al., 1992; Kanemasa et al., 1995; Salton et al., 2000).

The precursor protein in the rat is processed by the neuroendocrine-specific pro-hormone convertases PC1/3 and PC2, producing a number of peptides that are stored in dense core granules and secreted through the regulated pathway (Trani et al., 1995; 2002; Levi et al., 2004). Recently, in rat brain extracts, a previously uncharacterized VGF-derived peptide, designated as TLQP-21, which spans from residue 556 to residue 576 of the precursor sequence, was identified by our group (Bartolomucci et al., 2006). This peptide was able to increase energy expenditure, prevent the early phase of diet-induced obesity in mouse (Bartolomucci et al., 2006), to regulate food intake and body weight in hamsters (Jethwa et al., 2007; Jethwa and Ebling, 2008) and prevent death induced by serum and potassium deprivation, in rat cerebellar granule cells (Severini et al., 2008).

Besides TLQP-21, other VGF-derived peptides were shown to possess biological activity: TLQP-62 and AQEE-30 increased the synaptic charge in hippocampal neurons and produced an anti-depressant action (Alder et al., 2003; Hunsberger et al., 2007; Thakker-Varia et al., 2007), AQEE-30 and LQEQ-19 facilitated penile erection (Succu et al., 2004; 2005), and, more recently, LEGS-26 and QEAE-38 (named NERP-1 and NERP-2) suppressed vasopressin secretion both in vitro and in vivo assays (Yamaguchi et al., 2007).

In the peripheral nervous system, the vgf gene is highly expressed in sympathetic, primary sensory neurons and in myenteric plexus ganglia, with evidence of expression in the glandular portion of the stomach, suggesting the presence of this gene throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (Ferri et al., 1992; Liu et al., 1994; Salton et al., 2000; Snyder et al., 2003). Furthermore, pro-VGF fragments were described in human enterochromaffin-like cells, related hyperplastic and neoplastic cells (Rindi et al., 2007). However, the possible role of the VGF-derived peptides in the regulation of gastric functions has never been investigated.

The present work was designed to explore: (i) if some of the VGF-derived peptides may play a role in the regulation of rat GI functions testing their in vitro contractile activity on different parts of the rat GI tract; (ii) the mechanism of action of the unique active VGF-derived peptide (TLQP-21) on the in vitro contractile activity of the rat longitudinal forestomach (RLF) strip; (iii) the in vivo TLQP-21 central and peripheral effect on rat gastric emptying and its possible action mechanism.

As a consequence of our findings, we now know that, in vitro, TLQP-21 stimulated contraction of the RLF strip through the release of prostaglandins (PGs) from cell types within the mucosal layer and, in vivo, the peptide exerted a central inhibitory role on gastric emptying, involving PG release.

Methods

Animals

In vitro and in vivo studies were conducted according to the guidelines of the Italian Ministry of University and Research (D.L.116, 27/01/92) and the European Communities Council Directive (86/609/EEC). Each experimental protocol was authorized by the Ethics Committee of the Italian Ministry of Health.

In vitro studies

Gastrointestinal contraction

Wistar male and female rats (250–350 g; Charles River, Calco, Italy) were killed by inhalation of 75% CO2 in air. Different portions of the GI tract (oesophagus, stomach, pylorus, jejunum, proximal and distal colon) were removed and washed in fresh Tyrode's solution as previously described (Severini et al., 2000). For the stomach contractility assays, longitudinal strips were obtained from the RLF region and mounted vertically in a 5 mL organ bath in oxygenated (95% O2 and 5% CO2) Tyrode's solution at 37°C. Responses were recorded isotonically by a strain gauge transducer (DY 1, Basile, Milan, Italy) and displayed on a recording microdynamometer (Unirecord, Basile. Milano, Italy). Tissues were allowed to equilibrate for about 60 min and the Tyrode buffer was changed every 10 min.

Saturating concentrations of acetylcholine (ACh, 25 µmol·L−1) were added every 20 min, washing the tissue after 1 min contact time, until reproducible contractile responses were obtained. After 30 min equilibration time, TLQP-21 non-cumulative concentration–responses curves were constructed by adding increasing concentrations of the peptide to the tissue chamber, until maximum muscular responses occurred. The tissue was washed as soon as the contraction peak had developed, after a contact time with muscle strips of 1–3 min.

In preliminary experiments, peptide applications were performed at different time intervals (5, 10, 15 and 20 min) to establish the appropriate interval between subsequent administrations. As an interval of 20 min was necessary to obtain a complete recovery, that is, to avoid tachyphylaxis, this interval was used for every successive experiment. Only one concentration–response study was performed on each strip. TLQP-21-induced contractions were expressed as mean ± SEM of the percentage of ACh-induced contractions and EC50 calculated by interpolation from the appropriate concentration–response curve. Maximally effective concentration (Emax) denotes the maximal response achieved by the peptide, expressed as a percentage of that obtained with saturating concentrations of ACh (25 µmol·L−1).

Antagonists were all at a sufficiently high concentration to block the corresponding agonists under the experimental conditions.

To investigate the contribution of the gastric mucosa on the effect of TLQP-21, additional experiments were performed with mucosa-free strips. These preparations were obtained by removing the mucosa from the RLF with a lancet. The tissues were set up in the organ baths as previously mentioned.

Prostaglandin release

Longitudinal RLF strips were prepared as previously described and tested for standard response to ACh. Tissues were weighed and subsequently transferred to an Eppendorf tube and incubated without (control) or with TLQP-21 (400 nmol·L−1, 4 µmol·L−1) for 90 s at 37°C in 0.75 mL of Tyrode's solution. PGE2 and PGF2α concentration was measured immediately and in parallel using commercially available EIA kits (Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The reactions were read at 405 nm on a 1420-011 multi-label counter (Wallac Oy, 20101 Turku, Finland).

Immunostaining

Samples of gastric body-forestomach were taken from female adult rats (Wistar, 200–250 g, killed by decapitation: n = 8), pinned flat onto pieces of cork, immersion-fixed in paraformaldehyde (40 g·L−1, in 0.1 mol·L−1 phosphate buffer: 3 h at 0–4°C) and frozen as previously described (Rindi et al., 2007). The rabbit antiserum used was raised against the C-terminal sequence of rat VGF, VGF609–617, and has been previously characterized (Ferri et al., 1995). Rat gastric sections were treated with Triton X-100 (1 mL·L−1, in H2O for 1 h), incubated overnight with the anti-VGF antiserum (1:2000–10 000), followed by Cy3-conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA). Routine controls included substitution of each layer, in turn, with non-immune serum, or phosphate-buffered saline. Pre-absorption of the antiserum with the relevant peptide (approximately 50 nmol·mL−1) virtually abolished staining. Preparations were examined with a Olympus BX60 fluorescence and transmitted light microscope, equipped with a PM30 photographic system.

Western blot analysis of rat stomach homogenates

Wistar rats (weighing 250–350 g) were killed by inhalation of 75% CO2 in air. The stomachs were rapidly dissected, minced, boiled for 10 min in 10 mL H2O·g−1 of tissue and further incubated at room temperature for 15 min. Coarse materials were briefly sedimented and the supernatant cleared at 20 000×g for 45 min at 4°C. This procedure resulted in both protease inactivation and enriched extraction of low molecular weight peptides (Trani et al., 1995). Approximately 0.03 mg of proteins was loaded on gels according to the protocol for NuPAGE system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Western blot analysis was performed by using an anti-VGF609–617 serum (previously mentioned) at 1:5000 dilution for 2 h and goat anti-rabbit-HRP conjugated secondary antibody at 1:2000 dilution for 45 min (Pierce Biotecnology, Rockford, IL, USA). Chemiluminescent detection of immunoblots was achieved by using the Supersignal West Dura kit (Pierce Biotecnology, Rockford, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

In vivo studies

Gastric emptying

Adult Wistar rats, weighing 180–200 g (Charles River, Calco, Italy) were used. The animals were housed in single cages with wire net bases to avoid coprophagy. Before the experiments, rats were fasted for 24 h, but had free access to water until the treatment was started. For i.c.v. administration of peptides, a polyethylene cannula (PE10) was implanted into the left lateral ventricle of the brain, 5 days before the experiments as previously described (Netti et al., 1984). At the end of the experiments, dye (0.5% Evans Blue) was injected through the cannula to confirm its position in the ventricle.

The gastric emptying assay, consisting of a phenol red test meal was performed in female and male Wistar rats (Broccardo and Improta, 1990). Briefly, a liquid and acaloric meal (1.5 mL per rat) consisting of a 50 mg phenol red solution in 100 mL aqueous methylcellulose (1.5%) was administered by gavage to conscious rats. TLQP-21 (0.1, 0.4, 2, 8 and 32 nmol per rat) or saline (NaCl 0.9%) were injected i.c.v in a constant volume (5 µL per rat) immediately before meal administration. TLQP-21 (48 or 480 nmol·kg−1) or saline was administered 5 min before meal administration when i.p. injected. Rats were killed by CO2 (70%) inhalation 10 min after the test meal, when maximal differences between saline and TLQP-21 groups were observed. In each experiment, four non-treated rats were euthanized by CO2 (70%) inhalation immediately after the administration of the phenol red solution, and this was considered the reference of 0% emptying rate. The stomach and its contents were homogenized with 100 mL of 0.1 N NaOH, protein precipitated with 20% trichloroacetic acid and the supernatant made alkaline with NaOH. The absorbance of the sample was measured at 560 nm (A560) with a spectrophotometer. Gastric emptying (GE) for each rat was calculated according to the following formula: GE (%) = [1 − (A560 sample/mean of A560 reference)] × 100, where A560 sample was the absorption at 560 nm of the gastric content at 10 min and A560 reference was the absorption at 560 nm of the gastric content at zero emptying time. Each value was expressed as percentage change with respect to the percentage gastric emptying in saline-treated rats.

To provide insights into TLQP-21-evoked gastric motor responses, the cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor indomethacin was given in different ways to two sets of animals. In the first set, indomethacin was given s.c. (3 mg·kg−1) (Takeuchi et al., 1990), 20 min before i.c.v. TLQP-21. In the second set, indomethacin was given i.c.v. (0.25 mg per rat) (Saperas et al., 1991), 5 min before i.c.v. TLQP-21.

Data analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with a statistic package (GraphPad Prism, GraphPad Software San Diego, CA, USA). All data are represented as the mean ± SEM. Differences between the groups were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (anova) followed by multi-comparison Dunnett's test. The ED50 was calculated by linear regression analysis of the concentration–response data.

Chemicals

TLQP-21 (TLQPPASSRRRHFHHALPPAR) and the other VGF-derived peptides were synthesized by PRIMM (Milan, Italy). Stock solutions of peptides (1–10 mmol·L−1) were made in distilled water, stored at −20°C and then diluted in water before use. COX inhibitors (SC560, NS398) and PG receptor antagonists (SC19220 and PGF2α dimethylamide; Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) were dissolved in DMSO. SR140,333 was provided by Sanofi-Synthelabo Ricerche (Montpellier, France) and tetrodotoxin (TTX) was from Alomone (Jerusalem, Israel). The other reagents were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Results

In vitro activity

Gastrointestinal contraction

We tested the contractile activity of the natural and synthetic VGF-derived peptides reported in Figure 1 on different regions of the rat GI tracts (oesophagus, pylorus, gastric antrum, gastric forestomach, jejunum, proximal and distal colon). Each of the biologically active VGF-derived peptides purified from brain extracts (TLQP-62, TLQP-21, AQEE-30 and LQEQ-19) failed to evoke contractions in the tested GI preparations (25–50 µmol·L−1, n = 5, data not shown) with the exception of TLQP-21. This peptide elicited a reproducible and concentration-dependent contractile activity (100 nmol·L−1–6 µmol·L−1) of the RLF smooth muscle (Figure 2) and only weak and not concentration-dependent activity on oesophagus, gastric antrum and circular forestomach muscule strips, even at much higher concentrations (25–50 µmol·L−1, data not shown).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

VGF sequence. The upper figure shows the primary sequence of the VGF protein. The leader peptide is shown in italics, and the arrow indicates the cleavage site. VGF fragments that are known to show a biological activity are underlined. VGF-derived peptides, previously purified from brain extracts are, by convention, designated by the four-letter codes of N-terminal amino acids, and the number represents the total number of amino acid residues in the peptide. The VGF-derived peptides tested in this study are listed in the lower figure.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Contractile activity of TLQP-21 on rat longitudinal forestomach (RLF) strips. (A) TLQP-21 concentration–response curve. The figure shows comparative activity on male and female RLF strips. Each point represents the mean and the vertical bars the SEM of eight different determinations. Abscissa: −log of the peptide molar concentration. Ordinate: peptide activity as a percentage of the maximum effect obtained with 25 µmol·L−1 acetylcholine (ACh). (B) Qualitative example of the contractile responses evoked in female rats by increasing peptide concentrations (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3 and 6 µmol·L−1). Contractile activities are compared with the maximum response produced by 25 µmol·L−1 ACh.

In addition, we tested on RLF strips, the contractile action of the synthetic peptides TLQP-11, HFHH-10 and TLQP-30, corresponding to fragments or an extension of the TLQP-21 sequence. In view of the presence of specific cleavage sites in the VGF protein, these peptides could be generated in vivo by endogenous peptidases. Nevertheless, these peptides failed to contract RLF strips (25–50 µmol·L−1, n = 5, data not shown).

TLQP-21 was more potent on contracting RLF strips from female rats than those from male rats. As shown in Figure 2A, TLQP-21 (100 nmol·L−1–10 µmol·L−1) concentration-dependently contracted the RLF strips from male rats with Emax value of 33.4 ± 5.3% and EC50 value of 0.87 µmol·L−1 (n =8 at each concentration), while in female rats Emax was equal to 85.7 ± 7.9% and the EC50 value of 0.47 µmol·L−1 (n =8 at each concentration). In light of these sex differences, we used RLF strips from female rats for the subsequent in vitro pharmacological studies. A representative concentration–response trace is shown in Figure 2B. The effect of TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) was determined against contractions induced by ACh, at a concentration previously determined to be maximally effective (25 µmol·L−1, 1 min contact).

Contractile activity exerted by TLQP-21 showed a clear tachyphylaxis, as a second application of the peptide (1 µmol·L−1) at time intervals shorter than 20 min resulted in a reduced response, while complete reproducibility was obtained on reapplying the peptide after 20 min, as shown in Figure 3A and 3B. In addition, manual removal of the mucosal layer from the RLF strips prevented TLQP-21-induced contractile activity (3 ± 4% of the ACh-induced contraction, n = 5), while ACh-induced contraction was unmodified, when compared with the corresponding contraction of intact RLF preparations, relative to the weight of tissue used (Figure 3C).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Tachyphylaxis to TLQP-21. (A) A representative trace of contractile responses produced by TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1, arrows) in rat longitudinal forestomach (RLF) strips. Note that tachyphylaxis was induced when a second application of TLQP-21 was made, 5 min after the first. (B) TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) was given at different time intervals (5, 10, 15 and 20 min) after the initial application. Contractile effects of TLQP-21 show that an interval of 15–20 min was necessary to obtain a complete recovery. (C) Representative tracings acquired from two strips obtained from the same RLF: the left indicates an intact strip and the right, a strip after the removal of the mucosal layer. Arrows indicate the addition of TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1); arrowheads identify responses to 25 µmol·L−1 acetylcholine. Each point represents the mean ± SEM from five experiments expressed as percentage change versus the TLQP-21 initial activity (Time = 0). Statistically significant differences were calculated by one-way analysis of variance (anova) for repeated measures followed by Dunnett's test, analysing data from different time intervals and the corresponding control (0) (**P < 0.01).

Mechanisms of TLQP-21-induced contractions of RLF strips

To characterize the possible mediator(s) of TLQP-21 action, we tested different compounds, capable of inhibiting substances known to stimulate gastric motility (see Table 1). The addition of atropine, SR140,333, a mixture of methysergide and ketanserin, and a mixture of mepyramine and cimetidine did not modify the response elicited by TLQP-21, while it prevented or reduced any contraction evoked by their respective agonists ACh, substance P, 5-HT and histamine. TTX also failed to influence the effect of TLQP-21, suggesting that a neuronal action potential is not involved.

Table 1.

Effect of various antagonists on the contraction of rat longitudinal forestomach strips induced by TLQP-21 and by the corresponding selective agonists

Antagonists (mol·L−1) Agonist (mol·L−1) Absence of antagonist Presence of antagonist (%)
Tetrodotoxin (1 µmol·L−1) TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 98 ± 5
Atropine (1 µmol·L−1) TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 97 ± 4
Acetylcholine (10 µmol·L−1) 100 0*
Methysergide (2.5 µmol·L−1) + ketanserin (2.5 µmol·L−1) TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 96 ± 8
5-HT (10 µmol·L−1) 100 0*
Mepyramine (1 µmol·L−1) + cimetidine (1 µmol·L−1) TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 101 ± 3
Histamine (10 µmol·L−1) 100 0*
SR140.333 (100 nmol·L−1) TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 99 ± 6
Substance P (10 nmol·L−1) 100 0*

Contractile effects of TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) and with the other selective agonists (acetylcholine, 5-HT, histamine and substance P) in the absence of antagonists are reported as 100% of activity. Results obtained in the presence of different antagonists are expressed as % of the activity of the corresponding agonists (mean ± SEM from six independent experiments).

TLQP-21 was given at 20 min intervals to avoid tachyphylaxis, and the incubation time of the antagonists with the tissues was 15 min.

*

P < 0.05 versus the corresponding control (absence of antagonist).

On the other hand, 15 min pretreatment with the non-specific COX inhibitor indomethacin (from 100 nmol·L−1 to10 µmol·L−1), the specific COX-1 inhibitor (SC560, from 10 nmol·L−1 to 10 µmol·L−1) or the specific COX-2 inhibitor (NS398, from 10 nmol·L−1 to 10 µmol·L−1) dose-dependently prevented TLQP-21-induced contractions (1 µmol·L−1), as shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Effect of different COX inhibitors and PG receptor antagonists on the contractions of RLF strips induced by TLQP-21 and by PGE2 and PGF2α

Inhibitor (mol·L−1) Agonist (mol·L−1) Absence of inhibitor Presence of inhibitor (%)
Indomethacin 10 µmol·L−1 TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 6 ± 2*
1 µmol·L−1 100 58 ± 7*
100nmol·L−1 100 81 ± 6
S560 (COX-1) 10 µmol·L−1 TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 15 ± 4*
1 µmol·L−1 100 40 ± 8*
100 nmol·L−1 100 57 ± 7*
10 nmol·L−1 100 89 ± 11
NS398 (COX-2) 10 µmol·L−1 TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 0*
1 µmol·L−1 100 20 ± 3*
100 nmol·L−1 100 75 ± 5*
10 nmol·L−1 100 92 ± 8
SC19220 (EP antagonist) 100 µmol·L−1 TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 30 ± 7*
PGE2(5 nmol·L−1) 100 24 ± 5*
PGF2α(11 nmol·L−1) 100 98 ± 3
10 µmol·L−1 TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 83 ± 6
1 µmol·L−1 TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 96 ± 6
PGF2α dimethylamide (FP antagonist) 100 µmol·L−1 TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 50 ± 7*
PGF2α(11 nmol·L−1) 100 60 ± 9*
PGE2(5 nmol·L−1) 100 86 ± 6
10 µmol·L−1 TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) 100 75 ± 6

Contractile effects obtained with TLQP-21 (1 µmol·L−1) and with PGs (PGE2 and PGF2α) in the absence of inhibitors are reported as 100% of activity. Results obtained in the presence of different doses of COX inhibitors and PG antagonists are expressed as % of the activity of the corresponding agonists (mean ± SEM from six independent experiments).

TLQP-21 was given at 20 min intervals to avoid tachyphylaxis and the incubation time of the antagonists with the tissues was 15 min.

*

P < 0.05 versus the corresponding control (absence of inhibitor).

COX, cyclooxygenase; EP, prostaglandin E2 receptor; FP, prostaglandin F2α receptor; PG, prostaglandin; RLF, rat longitudinal forestomach.

To compare the TLQP-21 contractile activity on RLF strips with that of PGF2α and PGE2,non-cumulative concentration–responses curves of these PGs were made. The EC50 value for PGF2α was 11.5 nmol·L−1 (n =4 at each concentration), and the EC50 value for PGE2 was 5.5 nmol·L−1 (n =4 at each concentration), as compared with the TLQP-21 EC50 value of 0.87 µmol·L−1.

In the light of these findings, we investigated the identity of the PGs released in response to TLQP-21 using antagonists for the FP and the EP receptors (prostaglandin E2 and F2α receptors, nomenclature follows Alexander et al., 2008). Either PGF2a dimethylamide (antagonist for the FP receptor, 10–100 µmol·L−1) or SC19220 (antagonist for the EP receptor, 1–100 µmol·L−1) significantly reduced the TLQP-21-induced contraction as well as the activity of the corresponding agonists PGF2α and PGE2 used at EC50 concentrations (Table 2). To confirm the release of these PGs from RLF strips, these strips were incubated with different concentrations of TLQP-21 (400 nmol·L−1, 4 µmol·L−1) and the PG content of the incubation medium assayed by EIA. As shown in Figure 4, a dose-dependent increase in the concentration of PGE2 and PGF2α was detected in the medium following incubation with TLQP-21, when compared with the corresponding basal levels. On the contrary, no increase in PG production was detected by using the same tissues after mechanical removal of the mucosa (data not shown).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Prostaglandin (PG) release by rat longitudinal forestomach (RLF) strips. RLF strips were incubated without (Ctl) or with TLQP-21 (0.4 and 4 µmol·L−1) at 37°C. PG production was determined 60 s after peptide addition and detected by EIA (see Methods). Results are expressed as PG released corrected for the weight of the strip (pg·PG·mg−1 wet tissue) from five independent experiments (mean ± SEM). Statistically significant differences were calculated by one-way analysis of variance (anova) for repeated measurements followed by Dunnett's test, analysing data from treated samples and the corresponding controls (Ctl). (**P < 0.01).

VGF expression and processing in the rat stomach

We studied the presence and distribution of VGF-containing nerve structures in the stomach by means of immunocytochemistry using antibodies raised against the C-terminal region of VGF (Figure 5) (Ferri et al., 1995). As shown in Figure 5A, a number of strongly labelled, VGF C-terminus-immunoreactive axons were shown in the different layers of the forestomach (Figure 5A, panels a-c). Scattered bundles of beaded axons were seen in the mucosa, running in the lamina propria between the gastric glands (Figure 5A, panel a). The VGF-containing innervation of the muscularis externa was especially rich, with very numerous varicose axons running in both the circular and the longitudinal layers (Figure 5A, panel a). Immunoreactive terminals were also shown in myenteric ganglia, largely depicting non-labelled cell bodies (Figure 5, panels a and c). Weak but distinct labelling was seen in a few perikarya (Figure 5A, panel b).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

VGF localization. (A) VGF immunostaining. (a) A dense VGF-immunoreactive innervation was found in circular and longitudinal muscle layers, while small numbers of beaded fibres run in the mucosal lamina propria (bar scale = 100 µm). (b) Several VGF-immunoreactive terminals depict non-reactive cell bodies in myenteric ganglia (bar scale = 50 µm) and (c) an occasional immunolabelled perikaryon (bar scale = 10 µm) (bar scale = 40 µm). (B) VGF peptides in rat stomach. Western blot analysis performed on extracts from primary cultures of rat cerebellar granule cells (CGCs) maintained for 8 days in vitro and from rat stomach (St), as described in the Methods section. The apparent molecular weights in kDa are indicated on the right. Arrows point to the main VGF peptides: two arrows indicate the high MW precursors, while one arrow marks the peptides NAPP-129 and TLQP-62, previously described in rat neurons.

To characterize which of VGF-derived peptides, previously purified by brain extracts (Trani et al., 2002) were present, Western blot analysis was performed on extracts from rat stomach, comparing bands with those from primary cultures of rat cerebellar granule cells.

As shown in Figure 5B, in addition to high-form precursors (double arrows), two bands detected in stomach samples could be identified as NAPP-129 and TLQP-62 (single arrows) on the basis of their electrophoretic point. The presence of other peptides of lower molecular weight is difficult to detect by Western blot analysis.

In vivo studies

Gastric emptying

I.c.v. injections of TLQP-21 (from 0.1 to 32 nmol per rat) delayed gastric emptying of a phenol red meal, measured both in male and female rats, as reported in Figure 6A. TLQP-21 decreased the gastric emptying significantly, but not in a dose-related manner (2, 8 and 32 nmol per rat) in comparison with gastric emptying values in rats given i.c.v. saline (value marked 0). The maximal gastric emptying inhibitory response was about 40% both in male (Figure 6A) and female rats (data not shown). The effect of i.c.v. administration of TLQP-21 on gastric emptying was evaluated after i.p. and i.c.v. injection of the COX inhibitor indomethacin at dose levels, which had no effect on gastric emptying. Indomethacin (3 mg·kg−1), when given i.p., did not modify the delay of gastric emptying induced by i.c.v. administration of TLQP-21 (8 nmol per rat). However, when indomethacin was given i.c.v. (0.25 mg per rat), before i.c.v. TLQP-21, it totally blocked the inhibitory effect of the peptide (Figure 6B). TLQP-21, when administered peripherally (48 and 480 nmol·kg−1 i.p.), did not affect gastric emptying of a phenol red meal measured in male (Figure 6C) and female rats (data not shown).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Gastric emptying. (A) Effect of different doses of TLQP-21 injected i.c.v. (0.4–32 nmol per rat) on gastric emptying of a phenol red meal. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of gastric emptying values from eight rats expressed as a percentage change versus saline-treated rats (0.739 ± 0.08 = 100%). *P < 0.05 in comparison with the group injected with saline. (B) Effect of peripheral (3 mg·kg−1, i.p.) and central (0.25 mg per rat, i.c.v.) indomethacin pretreatment on gastric emptying – response to i.c.v. saline or TLQP-21 injection (8 nmol per rat). Each point represents the mean ± SEM of gastric emptying values from eight male rats expressed as a percentage change versus saline-treated rats (0.744 ± 0.01 = 100%). *P < 0.05 in comparison with the group injected with only TLQP-21. (C) Effect of different doses of TLQP-21 (48 and 480 nmol·kg−1) injected i.p. on gastric emptying. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of gastric emptying values from eight rats expressed as a percentage change versus saline-treated rats (0.745 ± 0.11 = 100%).

Discussion and conclusions

As previously reported, the vgf gene is expressed in the GI tract and, during rat development, its expression was detected by in situ hybridization as early as embryonic day 15.5 in the developing rat GI tract and oesophageal lumen (Snyder et al., 2003). Intense VGF immunoreactivity was observed in subpopulations of neurons of the enteric plexus and enteroendocrine cells in the adult rat (Ferri et al., 1992), indicating a possible role of the VGF-derived peptides in the regulation of GI smooth muscle functions in the rat.

In the present study, analysis of the contractile activity of the VGF-derived peptides, biologically active in other systems, showed that only TLQP-21, corresponding to the 556–576 fragment of the precursor protein, was able to influence GI contraction in vitro.

In the light of these findings, we assessed the biological relevance of TLQP-21 by characterizing it pharmacologically and elucidating its role on in vitro and in vivo motor GI functions.

Analysis of some in vitro GI test assays revealed that the TLQP-21 activity was limited to the RLF musculature. This peptide evoked, in RLF strips, a concentration- and gender-dependent contractile activity, showing a greater effect in the response intensity in female rather than in male rats. This difference in response might be ascribed to a quantitatively different distribution of TLQP-21 receptors between male and female RLF smooth muscle, but such a difference would be difficult to demonstrate, as the receptor has not yet been identified. Another possible explanation could be a different gender-related COX distribution in gastric smooth muscle but, to our knowledge, no data are reported on this matter.

In addition, the lack of activity of other fragments or extensions of TLQP-21, which can be generated in vivo, indicated that the biological activity is restricted to the TLQP-21 primary sequence.

With respect to the mechanism of action of TLQP-21 in vitro, the absence of any effect by TTX treatment suggested that this peptide does not function through the local nervous system. Moreover, manual removal of the mucosal layer from the RLF strips prevented TLQP-21- but not ACh-induced contraction, indicating that the stimulatory effect of this peptide on gastric smooth muscle was due to its direct action on receptors, localized in the gastric mucosa.

To provide further insights into the action mechanism of TLQP-21, we evaluated its effect in the presence of specific inhibitors of ACh, substance P, 5-HT and histamine, demonstrating that these mediators were not involved in its contractile activity.

However, the activity of TLQP-21 was affected by inhibitors of PG biosynthesis, regulated by the two isoforms of COX (Süleyman et al., 2007). In the stomach, the constitutive isoform (COX-1) is dominantly expressed while the mitogen-inducible isoform (COX-2) is negligibly expressed in normal stomach (Kargman et al., 1996, Schmassmann et al., 1998), but over-expressed during the healing of gastric lesions (Sun et al., 2000). In the present work, we demonstrated that both COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors concentration-dependently antagonized the contractile effects of TLQP-21.

As PGs generated via the COX-1 pathway are essential for physiological functions, whereas those formed via the COX-2 pathway have a role in pathophysiological events, this VGF-derived peptide may represent a new approach in the understanding and treatment of gastric dysfunction.

In addition, by the use of selective antagonists for the FP and EP receptors and additional EIA studies, performed by incubating RLF strips with TLQP-21, we confirmed that this VGF-derived peptide stimulated the release of PGE2 and PGF2α from cell types within the mucosal layer. It is well known that gastric mucosa synthesizes large amounts of PGs, among which PGF2α and PGE2 (Hawkey and Rampton, 1985) are able to contract the longitudinal smooth muscles (Takeuchi et al., 1990) through FP and EP1 receptors present in the muscle layer respectively (Shimomura et al., 1994; Sametz et al., 2000). All these findings suggest that TLQP-21, through unidentified receptors present in the gastric mucosa, stimulates the release of the PGs responsible for the muscle layer contraction.

To support a possible physiological role exerted by TLQP-21 in the regulation of gastric functions, in the present work we demonstrated an intense VGF immunoreactivity, prominent in axons in different layers of the forestomach. Furthermore, although detection of low molecular weight peptides from gut tissues still remains elusive, we identified in stomach homogenates, by Western blot analysis, higher molecular weight precursors and two bands with an electrophoretic profile, consistent with NAPP-129 and TLQP-62, which represent the most abundant VGF peptides in neuronal cells.

The second step of our study was to investigate the central and peripheral effects of TLQP-21 on rat gastric emptying in vivo. Our data showed that central but not peripheral administration of TLQP-21 evoked a significant but not gender- or dose-related delay of gastric emptying. First of all, these results clearly indicated that the gastric motor effect induced by centrally administered TLQP-21 is central nervous system-mediated. The lack of activity of TLQP-21 on gastric emptying after peripheral administration may be due to its different and lower peripheral bioavailability with respect to its central administration. Moreover, our in vivo results failed to confirm the gender-dependent gastric contractile effect, clearly observed in vitro. We would suggest that the receptor distribution in the brain areas involved in the TLQP-21 modulation of gastric emptying is quantitatively similar in both female and male rats. However, further information regarding the TLQP-21 pharmacokinetics and its receptor distribution will be necessary.

Finally, the lack of concentration dependence of the central inhibitory effect of TLQP-21 on gastric emptying could be explained as the consequence of the integrated action with other neurotransmitter pathways/release involved in the control of this function. It is well established that neuropeptides play an important role in the central control of gastric motility in vivo, via a mechanism that requires PGs (Takeuchi et al., 1990; Robert et al., 1991; Bakke, 1993; Shimomura et al., 1994; Sütöet al., 1996; Sekiguchi et al., 2006). To better characterize the mechanisms underlying the central effects of TLQP-21 on gastric motor function, we tested the action of this peptide after pretreatment with the PG synthesis inhibitor indomethacin. This inhibitor in vitro had been shown to abolish the gastric contractile effect of TLQP-21. The finding that the gastric emptying delay induced by central TLQP-21 was blocked by central but not peripheral injection of indomethacin permitted us to speculate that TLQP-21 affects gastric emptying by stimulating central PG pathways. Our hypothesis is strongly supported by recent reports indicating that activation of EP4 signalling in the central nervous system delayed gastric emptying and suppressed food intake in mice (Ohinata et al., 2006). In addition, the inhibitory effect of centrally administered TLQP-21 on food intake and body weight in hamsters (Jethwa et al., 2007) involves PG production in the brain areas controlling these activities.

The specific brain sites involved in the inhibitory control of gastric emptying by TLQP-21 remain to be elucidated. However, the presence of immunoreactivity for VGF in various hypothalamic nuclei such as paraventricular nucleus and arcuate nucleus, involved in the control of GI functions (Tebbe et al., 2001), suggests that TLQP-21 could be active in these areas.

In conclusion, among the VGF-derived peptides tested, only TLQP-21 played a role in the local and central regulation of gastric motor functions through a PG-dependent mechanisms.

In view of the primary role that stomach plays in feeding, the gastric anti-emptying effect induced by TLQP-21 certainly represents a signal of satiety which, together with the peptide-induced increase of energy expenditure previously reported (Bartolomucci et al., 2006), could be a further mechanism by which this new brain-gut neuropeptide could prevent weight gain and obesity.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from FIRB RBNE013XSXSJ to RP and GLF and FIRB RBNEO1JKLF to RP, GLF and FG and partially by Regione Lazio funding for ‘Sviluppo della ricerca sul cervello’. We would like to thank Dr Alessandro Bartolomucci for critically reading this manuscript.

Glossary

Abbreviations:

CGC

cerebellar granule cells; COX, cyclooxygenase

Emax

maximally effective concentration

EP

prostaglandin E2 receptor

FP

prostaglandin F2α receptor

GI

gastrointestinal

PG

prostaglandin

RLF

rat longitudinal forestomach

TTX

tetrodotoxin

Conflict of interest

The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alder J, Thakker-Varia S, Bangasser DA, Kuroiwa M, Plummer MR, Shors TJ, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor-induced gene expression reveals novel actions of VGF in hippocampal synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci. 2003;23:10800–10808. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-34-10800.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander SPH, Mathie A, Peters JA. Guide to Receptors and Channels (GRAC) Br J Pharmacol. (3rd) 2008;153:S1–S209. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakke HK. CNS effects on gastric functions: from clinical observations to peptidergic brain-gut interactions. J Physiol Paris. 1993;87:265–271. doi: 10.1016/0928-4257(93)90015-l. Review. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartolomucci A, La Corte G, Possenti R, Locatelli V, Rigamonti AE, Torsello A, et al. TLQP-21, a VGF-derived peptide, increases energy expenditure and prevents the early phase of diet-induced obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:14584–14589. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606102103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Broccardo M, Improta G. Pituitary-adrenal and vagus modulation of sauvagine- and CRF-induced inhibithion of gastric emptying in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1990;182:357–362. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(90)90294-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferri GL, Levi A, Possenti R. A novel neuroendocrine gene product: selective VGF8a gene expression and immuno-localisation of the VGF protein in endocrine and neuronal populations. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1992;13:139–143. doi: 10.1016/0169-328x(92)90053-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferri GL, Gaudio RM, Cossu M, Rinaldi AM, Polak JM, Berger P, et al. The ‘VGF’ protein in rat adenohypophysis: sex differences and changes during the estrous cycle and after gonadectomy. Endocrinology. 1995;136:2244–2251. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.5.7720674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hawkey CJ, Rampton DS. Prostaglandins and the gastrointestinal mucosa: are they important in its function, disease, or treatment? Gastroenterology. 1985;89:1162–1188. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(85)90225-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hunsberger JG, Newton SS, Bennett AH, Duman CH, Russell DS, Salton SR, et al. Antidepressant actions of the exercise-regulated gene VGF. Nat Med. 2007;13:1476–1482. doi: 10.1038/nm1669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jethwa PH, Ebling FJ. Role of VGF-derived peptides in the control of food intake, body weight and reproduction. Neuroendocrinology. 2008;88:80–87. doi: 10.1159/000127319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jethwa PH, Warner A, Nilaweera KN, Brameld JM, Keyte JW, Carter WG, et al. VGF-derived peptide, TLQP-21, regulates food intake and body weight in Siberian hamsters. Endocrinology. 2007;148:4044–4055. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kanemasa K, Okamura H, Kodama T, Kashima K, Ibata Y. Time course of the induction of VGF mRNA in the dorsal vagal complex in rats with cysteamine-induced peptic ulcers. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1995;34:309–314. doi: 10.1016/0169-328x(95)00183-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kargman S, Charleson S, Cartwright M, Frank J, Riendeau D, Mancini J, et al. Characterization of prostaglandin G/H synthase 1 and 2 in rat, dog, monkey, and human gastrointestinal tracts. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:445–454. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8690211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levi A, Eldridge JD, Paterson BM. Molecular cloning of a gene sequence regulated by nerve growth factor. Science. 1985;229:393–395. doi: 10.1126/science.3839317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Levi A, Ferri GL, Watson E, Possenti R, Salton SR. Processing, distribution, and function of VGF, a neuronal and endocrine peptide precursor. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2004;24:517–533. doi: 10.1023/B:CEMN.0000023627.79947.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu JW, Andrews PC, Mershon JL, Yan C, Allen DL, Ben Jonathan N. Peptide V: a VGF-derived neuropeptide purified from bovine posterior pituitary. Endocrinology. 1994;135:2742–2748. doi: 10.1210/endo.135.6.7988466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Netti C, Bossa R, Galatulas I, Sibilia V, Pecile A. Antinociceptive effect of centrally administered cimetidine and dimaprit in the rat. Pharmacology. 1984;28:262–267. doi: 10.1159/000137972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ohinata K, Suetsugu K, Fujiwara Y, Yoshikawa M. Activation of prostaglandin E receptor EP4 subtype suppresses food intake in mice. Prostaglandins and other lipid mediators. 2006;81:31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2006.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rindi G, Licini L, Necchi V, Bottarelli L, Campanili N, Azioni C, et al. Peptide products of the neurotrophin-inducible gene vgf are produced in human neuroendocrine cells from early development and increase in hyperplasia and neoplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:2811–2815. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Robert A, Olafsson AS, Lancaster C, Zhang WR. Interleukin-1 is cytoprotective, antisecretory, stimulates PGE2 synthesis by the stomach, and retards gastric emptying. Life Sci. 1991;48:123–134. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(91)90405-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Salton SR. Nucleotide sequence and regulatory studies of VGF, a nervous system-specific mRNA that is rapidly and relatively selectively induced by nerve growth factor. J Neurochem. 1991;57:991–996. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb08248.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Salton SR, Fischberg DJ, Dong KW. Structure of the gene encoding VGF, a nervous system-specific mRNA that is rapidly and selectively induced by nerve growth factor in PC12 cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1991;11:2335–2349. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.5.2335-2349.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Salton SR, Ferri GL, Hahm S, Snyder SE, Wilson AJ, Possenti R, et al. VGF: a novel role for this neuronal and neuroendocrine polypeptide in the regulation of energy balance. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2000;21:199–219. doi: 10.1006/frne.2000.0199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sametz W, Hennerbichler S, Glaser S, Wintersteiger R, Juan H. Characterization of prostanoid receptors mediating actions of the isoprostanes, 8-iso-PGE(2) and 8-iso-PGF(2alpha), in some isolated smooth muscle preparations. Br J Pharmacol. 2000;130:1903–1910. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Saperas E, Kauffmann G, Taché Y. Role of central prostaglandin E2 in the regulation of gastric acid secretion in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991;209:1–7. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(91)90002-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schmassmann A, Peskar BM, Stettler C, Netzer P, Stroff T, Flogerzi B, et al. Effects of inhibition of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 in chronic gastro-intestinal ulcer models in rats. Br J Pharmacol. 1998;123:795–804. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sekiguchi F, Hasegawa N, Inoshita K, Yonezawa D, Inoi N, Kanke T, et al. Mechanisms for modulation of mouse gastrointestinal motility by proteinase-activated receptor (PAR)-1 and -2 in vitro. Life Sci. 2006;78:950–957. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.06.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Severini C, Salvadori S, Guerrini R, Falconieri-Erspamer G, Mignogna G, Erspamer V. Parallel bioassay of 39 tachykinins on 11 smooth muscle preparations. Structure and receptor selectivity/affinity relationship. Peptides. 2000;21:1587–1595. doi: 10.1016/s0196-9781(00)00290-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Severini C, Ciotti MT, Biondini L, Quaresima S, Rinaldi AM, Levi A, et al. TLQP-21, a neuroendocrine VGF-derived peptide, prevents cerebellar granule cells death induced by serum and potassium deprivation. J Neurochem. 2008;104:534–544. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05068.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shimomura A, Itoh H, Niki Y, Suga T, Fujioka H, Ito M, et al. Contractile actions of endothelins in rat gastric body: evidence for receptor subtypes and involvement of prostaglandin E2. Eur J Pharmacol. 1994;252:81–86. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(94)90578-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Snyder SE, Peng B, Pintar JE, Salton SR. Expression of VGF mRNA in developing neuroendocrine and endocrine tissues. J Endocrinol. 2003;179:227–235. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1790227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Succu S, Cocco C, Mascia MS, Melis T, Melis MR, Possenti R, et al. Pro-VGF-derived peptides induce penile erection in male rats: possible involvement of oxytocin. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20:3035–3040. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03781.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Succu S, Mascia MS, Melis T, Sanna F, Melis MR, Possenti R, et al. Pro-VGF-derived peptides induce penile erection in male rats: involvement of paraventricular nitric oxide. Neuropharmacology. 2005;49:1017–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Süleyman H, Demircan B, Karagöz Y. Anti-inflammatory and side effects of cyclooxygenase inhibitors. Pharmacol Rep. 2007;59:247–258. Review. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sun WH, Tsuji S, Tsujii M, Gunawan ES, Sawaoka H, Kawai N, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors suppress epithelial cell kinetics and delay gastric wound healing in rats. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:752–761. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02242.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sütö G, Király A, Plourde V, Taché Y. Intravenous interleukin-1-beta-induced inhibition of gastric emptying: involvement of central corticotrophin-releasing factor and prostaglandin pathways in rats. Digestion. 1996;57:135–140. doi: 10.1159/000201326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Takeuchi K, Okada M, Niida H, Okabe S. Possible mechanisms involved in gastric hypermotility caused by indomethacin in the rat. Role of glycoprivic response. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:984–992. doi: 10.1007/BF01537247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tebbe JJ, Dietze T, Grote C, Mönnikes H. Excitatory stimulation of neurons in the arcuate nucleus inhibits gastric acid secretion via vagal pathways in anesthetized rats. Brain Res. 2001;913:10–17. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02746-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Thakker-Varia S, Krol JJ, Nettleton J, Bilimoria PM, Bangasser DA, Shors TJ, et al. The neuropeptide VGF produces antidepressant-like behavioral effects and enhances proliferation in the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2007;27:12156–12167. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1898-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Trani E, Ciotti T, Rinaldi AM, Canu N, Ferri GL, Levi A, et al. Tissue-specific processing of the neuroendocrine protein VGF. J Neurochem. 1995;65:2441–2449. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.65062441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Trani E, Giorni A, Canu N, Amadoro G, Rinaldi AM, Halban PA, et al. Isolation and characterization of VGF peptides in rat brain. Role of PC1/3 and PC2 in the maturation of VGF precursor. J Neurochem. 2002;81:565–574. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00842.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yamaguchi H, Sasaki K, Satomi Y, Shimbara T, Kageyama H, Mondal MS, et al. Peptidomic identification and biological validation of neuroendocrine regulatory peptide-1 and -2. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:26354–26360. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701665200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES