Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 20.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2008 Dec 31;119(2):269–280. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.773424

Table 1.

Effects of TAC on LV Structure and Function in WT vs. SPARC Null Mice

Control TAC
WT SPARC Null WT SPARC Null
Age (months) 4 ± 1 4 ± 1 4 ± 1 4 ± 1
BW (g) 25 ± 1 24 ± 1 22 ± 1 23 ± 1
Tibia Length (mm) 20 ± 1 20 ± 1 20 ± 1 20 ± 1
LV Mass (mg) 85 ± 5 88 ± 4 126 ± 8* 136 ± 9#
LV/BW (mg/g) 3.5 ± 0.1 3.6 ± 0.1 5.7 ± 0.3* 5.9 ± 0.3#
LV/TL (mg/mm) 4.2 ± 0.2 4.4 ± 0.2 6.3 ± 0.4* 6.8 ± 0.4#
AOPG (mmHg) 0 0 97 ± 3* 97 ± 3#
LV EDV (μL) 36 ± 1 38 ± 2 40 ± 2 38 ± 1
LV EF (%) 70 ± 3 72 ± 1 67 ± 2 70 ± 1
Wall Thickness (mm) 0.7 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1* 1.1 ± 0.1#
Heart Rate (bpm) 440 ± 18 426 ± 11 411 ± 25 403 ± 14

Abbreviations: AOPG = Aortic pressure gradient across the transverse aortic constriction (TAC), BW = Body Weight, EDV = End Diastolic Volume, EF = Ejection Fraction, LV = Left Ventricular, SPARC = Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine, TL = Tibia Length, WT = Wild Type, Data are mean ± SEM

*

= p < 0.05 vs. Sham WT

#

= p < 0.05 vs. Sham SPARC Null, & = p <, 0.05 vs. WT TAC.