Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2009 Apr 30;284(26):17564–17574. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.013987

Transforming Growth Factor-β Promotes Recruitment of Bone Marrow Cells and Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells through Stimulation of MCP-1 Production in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells*

Fan Zhang ‡,1, Shirling Tsai §,1, Kaori Kato ‡, Dai Yamanouchi ‡, Chunjie Wang §, Shahin Rafii , Bo Liu ‡,2, K Craig Kent ‡,2
PMCID: PMC2719395  PMID: 19406748

Abstract

Bone marrow-derived progenitor cells have recently been shown to be involved in the development of intimal hyperplasia after vascular injury. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) has profound stimulatory effects on intimal hyperplasia, but it is unknown whether these effects involve progenitor cell recruitment. In this study we found that although TGF-β had no direct effect on progenitor cell recruitment, conditioned media derived from vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) stimulated with TGF-β induced migration of both total bone marrow (BM) cells and BM-mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and also induced MSC differentiation into smooth muscle like cells. Furthermore, overexpression of the signaling molecule Smad3 in VSMC via adenovirus-mediated gene transfer (AdSmad3) enhanced the TGF-β's chemotactic effect. Microarray analysis of VSMC stimulated by TGF-β/AdSmad3 revealed monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) as a likely factor responsible for progenitor cell recruitment. We then demonstrated that TGF-β through Smad3 phosphorylation induced a robust expression of MCP-1 in VSMC. Recombinant MCP-1 mimicked the stimulatory effect of conditioned media on BM and MSC migration. In the rat carotid injury model, Smad3 overexpression significantly increased MCP-1 expression after vascular injury, consistent with our in vitro results. Interestingly, TGF-β/Smad3-induced MCP-1 was completely blocked by both Ro-32-0432 and rotterlin, suggesting protein kinase C-δ (PKCδ) may play a role in TGF-β/Smad3-induced MCP-1 expression. In summary, our data demonstrate that TGF-β, through Smad3 and PKCδ, stimulates VSMC production of MCP-1, which is a chemoattractant for bone marrow-derived cells, specifically MSC. Manipulation of this signaling system may provide a novel approach to inhibition of intimal hyperplasia.

Introduction

Intimal hyperplasia after vascular injury is a complex process involving vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, migration, and extracellular matrix deposition. It is believed that vascular injuries transform vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC)3 from a quiescent to a synthetic and proliferative phenotype (1). These “activated” VSMC migrate to the subintima space where they continue to proliferate and, thus, form the neointimal lesion (2). Recent evidence, however, suggests that bone marrow-derived progenitor cells (BMPC) are recruited to sites of vascular injury and may also play an essential role in the development of intimal hyperplasia (3–7).

The mechanisms underlying BMPC recruitment to the site of arterial injury are now being elucidated. The following three steps are believed to occur with BMPC in response to arterial injury; 1) mobilization of cells from the bone marrow, 2) recruitment of these cells to the site of injury, and 3) differentiation of progenitor cells into cells of the arterial wall (8). A number of chemokines are responsible for the second phase of this process, and proteins that have been implicated include but are not limited to stromal-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) (3, 4), c-kit (5), and monocyte chemoattractant protein 3 (MCP-3) (9, 10). We and others have recently found that some of these chemoattractants can be released by VSMC at the time of arterial injury, although the signals that stimulate their release have not been elucidated.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are present in bone-marrow stroma and capable of differentiating into multiple cell types, including smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and cardiomyoblast progenitors. MSC are believed to contribute to the repair of injured myocardial and nerve tissue (9, 10). Furthermore, it has recently been shown in a mouse femoral artery wire injury model that MSC are recruited to the neointimal lesion (11).

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) has been repeatedly demonstrated to be a provocative factor in the development of intimal hyperplasia. Studies have shown that TGF-β mRNA and protein levels are elevated during progressive neointimal thickening (12, 13). Furthermore, administration of recombinant TGF-β after injury has been shown to enhance intimal hyperplasia (14), whereas blockade of TGF-β signaling reduces this process (15). Active TGF-β signals by binding to a specific serine/threonine kinase type II receptor, which then recruits and phosphorylates the type I receptor. Receptor activation by TGF-β leads to phosphorylation of Smads 2 and 3, both which heterodimerize with Smad4. The resulting complex enters the cell nucleus to directly regulate transcriptional activation of target genes (16, 17). We have previously shown that TGF-β through Smad3 signaling increases the expression of fibronectin in VSMC, an extracellular matrix protein that has been implicated in intimal hyperplasia (2).

Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is a member of the C-C chemokine family, which is classically known to play a major role in inducing monocyte migration to sites of inflammation and injury. Recently it has been reported that MCP-1, acting through its receptor CCR2, plays a key role in the recruitment of monocytes from the peripheral circulation into early atherosclerotic and restenotic lesions (18). Furthermore, suppression of MCP-1 by administration of a neutralizing MCP-1 antibody or gene transfer of mutant MCP-1 inhibited neointimal hyperplasia in injured rat carotid arteries (19, 20). Although these studies of MCP-1 have focused on the recruitment of monocytes and macrophages to the arterial wall, the possibility that MCP-1 might also enhance intimal hyperplasia through the recruitment of stem or progenitor cells has not been addressed. Suggesting this as a possibility is recent evidence that mesenchymal stem cells express the MCP-1 receptor, CCR2 (21, 22). Additionally, the related cytokine MCP-3 has been shown to play an essential role in recruiting mesenchymal stem cells to injured myocardial tissue (9). Together, these findings suggest that MCP-1 may be involved in the pathogenesis of intimal hyperplasia by inducing progenitor cell recruitment in a manner similar to its known effects on mononuclear cells.

In the present study, we hypothesize that TGF-β through Smad3 signaling induces VSMC secretion of MCP-1, which acts as a bone marrow-derived progenitor cell or mesenchymal stem cell chemoattractant. These findings raise the possibility that the stimulatory effect of TGF-β on intimal hyperplasia includes at least in part, the recruitment of bone marrow progenitor cells to the neointima.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

General Materials

Recombinant TGF-β1 and rat MCP-1 were obtained from R&D Systems. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and cell culture reagents were from Invitrogen. Other reagents, if not specified, were purchased from Sigma.

Smooth Muscle Cell Culture

Rat aortic SMC were isolated from the thoracic aorta of male Sprague-Dawley rats based on a protocol described by Clowes et al. (23) and maintained in DMEM containing 10% fetal FBS at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cell viability was assayed by the trypan blue exclusion method, which indicated that <5% of the cells took up the dye both before and after the infection of adenoviral vectors or treatment with recombinant TGF-β1 or inhibitors. For experiments using conditioned media, RSMC (2 × 105 cells/well in 6-well plates) were infected with adenovirus (30,000 particles/cell in DMEM containing 2% FBS for 4 h at 37 °C) followed by starvation in DMEM containing 0.5% FBS for 48 h. The cells were then treated with recombinant TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml) or solvent (4 mm HCl with 2% bovine serum albumin) for 6 h. Media were collected and used for ELISA or chemotaxis assays as described below.

Rat Mesenchymal Stem Cell Culture

Rat MSC isolated from rat bone marrow were obtained from Cell Applications Inc. (San Diego, CA). The cells were maintained through the use of mesenchymal stem cell growth medium kit (Cell Applications Inc.). MSC populations were passaged 1–4 times. Cells were harvested from plates using a solution containing 0.25% trypsin and 1 mm EDTA (Invitrogen). Confirmation of MSC was made through the presence of cell surface markers such as CD90, CD44, and CD54 and the absence of CD31 and CD45. For cell differentiation experiments, MSC up to passage 4 were plated in MSC growth medium (non-differentiating).

Isolation of Rat Bone Marrow

Bone marrow from Sprague-Dawley rats was isolated by flushing the long bones with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline containing 2% bovine serum albumin, and heparin (1000 units/ml). Cells from individual animals were pooled. Bone marrow was dissociated by aspiration with a Pasteur pipette. Red blood cells were excluded using Ficoll-Hypaque (GE Healthcare) density centrifugation. The remaining cells were then rinsed twice in phosphate-buffered saline followed by centrifugation.

Construction of Adenoviral Vectors and Infection

Adenoviral vectors expressing Smad3 (AdSmad3), PKCδ (AdPKCδ), and GFP (AdGFP) were constructed as previously described (2).

Cell Migration Assay

2 × 105 bone marrow cells or 2 × 105 MSC were placed in the upper chamber of Costar 24-well transwell plates with 5-μm pore filters (Corning, Inc., Corning, NY). Cultured conditioned medium was placed into the lower chambers or wells. After incubating plates for 6 h at 37 °C, migrated cells were collected from the lower chambers and counted.

siRNA Knockdown of MCP-1 and Smad3

RSMC were plated at 50–60% confluence in DMEM culture medium in 6-well plates and incubated for 24 h. Cells were then transfected in Opti-MEM I medium with 20 nmol of siRNA for rat MCP-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), 100 pmol of siRNA for Smad3 (Invitrogen), or control siRNA using RNAiMax transfection reagent (Invitrogen), as described by the manufacturer's protocol. After 6 h, the Opti-MEM I medium was replaced by DMEM containing 0.5% FBS, and cells were starved for 48 h. Cells that were infected with adenovirus were infected the day after transfection, then starved for the remaining 48 h. The cells were then stimulated with recombinant TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml) or solvent for 6 h, after which conditioned media was collected for chemotaxis assays and MCP-1 ELISA, and cells were lysed for protein used in Western blotting.

Western Blot Analysis

Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mm Tris, 150 mm NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 10 μg/ml aprotinin). Fifty micrograms of protein from each sample were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gels. The protein samples were then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Protein expression was confirmed by immunoblotting with the following antibodies: rabbit anti-Smad3 (AbCam), rabbit anti-pSmad3 (AbCam), and mouse anti-β-actin (Sigma). After incubation with the appropriate primary and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, the membranes were developed with enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Amersham Biosciences).

Microarray Analysis

RSMC were infected with AdSmad3 or AdGFP followed by starvation for 48 h in DMEM containing 0.5% FBS, then treated with recombinant TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml) or solvent for 6 h. Cells were harvested, and total RNA was extracted by RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). This RNA was then processed according to the protocol recommended by Affymetrix using the Superscript Choice kit (Invitrogen) for double-stranded cDNA synthesis and the Enzo Bioarray kit for in vitro transcription and labeling of cRNA. 15-μg samples of fragmented cRNA were hybridized for 16 h at 45 °C to rat 230.2.0 arrays (Affymetrix). Data analysis was performed using GeneSpringTM software 5.1 (Silicon Genetics) for normalization, -fold change calculations, and clustering.

RT-PCR

Expression of the mRNA of MCP-1 was detected by RT-PCR. RNA was isolated from rat SMC using a kit from Qiagen. A segment of the cDNA was detected using RT-PCR for MCP-1 using MCP-1 primers, which were obtained from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

ELISA for MCP-1-ELISA to detect MCP-1 secreted by RSMC was performed using rat MCP-1 ELISA kit (BD Biosciences). RSMC were cultured at a density of 1 × 105/ml in 1 ml of complete medium in the presence or absence of different stimuli in 6-well plates (Costar). After incubation for specified periods of time at 37 °C, cell-free culture supernatants were obtained. The concentrations of MCP-1 were then measured according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Rat Balloon Injury Model and in Vivo Gene Delivery

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (450–500 g) underwent balloon injury of the left common carotid artery as described elsewhere in accordance with institutional guidelines and approval (24, 25). Briefly, after induction of anesthesia with isoflurane, a 2-French balloon catheter was inserted through the left external carotid artery into the common carotid and insufflated with 1 ml of air three times. Recombinant adenoviral vectors were constructed to express Smad3 as previously described; an empty viral vector was used as a control (26). After injury, animals received intraluminal administration of adenoviral vectors as indicated (2.5 × 109 plaque-forming unit in 200 μl of serum-free media over 20 min). The external carotid artery was then ligated, and flow was re-established through the common carotid and internal carotid arteries.

Rats were sacrificed 5 days after injury, and perfusion was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde diluted in phosphate-buffered saline at a pressure of 100 mm Hg for 15 min. The left and right carotid arteries were then harvested and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for an additional 30 min. The arteries were then paraffin-embedded and cut into 7-μm sections for histological analysis.

Bone Marrow Labeling in Vitro and Implantation

Bone marrow cells were extracted from rat long bones and labeled with fluorescent dyes using a PKH26 red fluorescent cell linker kit (Sigma-Aldrich). After left carotid balloon angioplasty was performed, a 24-gauge angiocath was inserted into the external carotid arteriotomy and secured. 5 × 107 BM suspended in 1 ml phosphate-buffered saline were injected systemically through the arteriotomy. The external carotid artery was then ligated, and flow was re-established from the common carotid artery to the internal carotid artery. Rats were sacrificed 48 h after BM cell injection, and the tissue was frozen into blocks with optimal cutting temperature medium (Sakura Finetek Inc.).

Immunohistochemistry

Immunostaining for MCP-1 using monoclonal anti-MCP-1 antibody (Santa Cruz) was performed as described previously (24). Slides were visualized with a Nikon Eclipse E800 upright microscope. Digital images were acquired using a RetigaEXi CCD digital camera and processed and analyzed using IPLab software. Semiquantitative immunohistochemical analysis was performed using Adobe Photoshop 7.0 and NIH imaging software (ImageJ) (24).

Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± S.E. Unpaired Student's t test was used to evaluate the statistical differences between control and treated groups. In cases of multiple groups, differences were first analyzed with one-way analysis of variance. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. All experiments were repeated at least in triplicate.

RESULTS

TGF-β Induces VSMC to Secrete Bone Marrow and Progenitor Cell Chemoattractants

To begin testing our hypothesis that TGF-β stimulates intimal hyperplasia through the recruitment of BMPC, we first established a bone marrow cell chemotaxis assay using SDF-1α as a positive control (Fig. 1A). We then evaluated whether recombinant TGF-β could directly stimulate either total bone marrow cell or MSC migration. TGF-β alone had no direct effect on progenitor cell migration (Fig. 1, A and B). We then asked whether TGF-β might stimulate VSMC to produce progenitor cell chemoattractants as it is well established that TGF-β levels are elevated after vascular injury. As shown in Fig. 1, C and D, conditioned media derived from rat aortic VSMC treated with TGF-β significantly increased both total bone marrow cell as well as isolated rat MSC chemotaxis. These findings suggest that TGF-β activates VSMC, which in turn produce a secreted factor that is responsible for recruitment or chemotaxis of bone marrow progenitor cells.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

TGF-β stimulates SMC to express factors that attract bone marrow progenitor cells. Results are for rat bone marrow cell chemotaxis assays. Recombinant TGF-β (5 ng/ml) alone had no effect on total bone marrow cell migration as compared with positive control SDF-1α (100 ng/ml) (A) or on isolated rat MSC migration (B). However, conditioned media from VSMC stimulated with TGF-β was found to induce both total bone marrow cell migration (C) and isolated rat MSC migration (D) (n = 3). *, p < 0.05 compared with control.

The Effect of TGF-β on Progenitor Cell Chemotaxis Is Mediated by Smad3

Smad3 is a major signaling molecule for TGF-β that we and others have shown to be important in mediating many of the TGF-β effects on VSMC. We, therefore, hypothesized that Smad3 might mediate the effect of TGF-β on progenitor cell recruitment. To examine whether Smad3 plays a role in TGF-β-induced secretion of BMPC chemoattractants by VSMC, we infected rat aortic VSMC with adenoviral vectors expressing Smad3 (AdSmad3) and then stimulated cells with recombinant TGF-β1, thus enhancing TGF-β/Smad3 signaling. As shown in Fig. 2, conditioned media from VSMC treated with AdSmad3 and TGF-β significantly increased both total bone marrow cell as well as isolated rat MSC migration, compared with conditioned media from VSMC treated with TGF-β alone.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Smad3 overexpression enhances the stimulatory effect of TGF-β on SMC. VSMC were infected with control virus (AdGFP) or AdSmad3 and stimulated with TGF-β. Conditioned media was then used in chemotaxis assays. Treatment with AdSmad3 in addition to TGF-β further induced VSMC secretion of factors that attract both total bone marrow cells (A) and isolated MSC (B) (n = 3). *, p < 0.05, compared with control; #, p < 0.05 compared with TGF-β.

To further study the role of Smad3 in this process, we examined the effect of inhibition of Smad3 signaling on BMPC recruitment. VMSC were pretreated with SB431542 (10 μg/ml), a TGF-β receptor kinase inhibitor that, at this concentration, is specific for Smad2/3 phosphorylation. As shown in Fig. 3A, treatment with SB431542 effectively inhibited TFG-β-induced phosphorylation of both endogenous and adenovirus-derived Smad3 but did not affect total expression of Smad3. VSMC treated with TGF-β or TGF-β/AdSmad3 were pretreated with SB431542, and the effect of this conditioned media on bone marrow cell and MSC migration was evaluated. As shown in Fig. 3, B and C, pretreatment of VSMC with SB431542 followed by stimulation with TGF-β or TGF-β/AdSmad3 resulted in a significant decrease in the chemotaxis of both bone marrow cells and MSC in response to conditioned media derived from VSMC. These data confirm that phosphorylation of Smad3 is an essential step in TGF-β mediated recruitment of progenitor cells by vascular SMC.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

TGF-β stimulates BMPC migration through Smad3 signaling. A, Western blot showing inhibition of phosphorylation of both endogenous and adenovirus-derived Smad3 by SB431542 (10 μg/ml). Shown is a chemotaxis assay using whole bone marrow cells (B) or isolated rat MSC (C) and conditioned media from VSMC pretreated with SB431542 and TGF-β/AdSmad3. Data are expressed as -fold change compared with conditioned media from VSMC infected with AdGFP only. D, Western blot showing down-regulation of total Smad3 in cells treated with Smad3 siRNA. Chemotaxis assay using total bone marrow (E) and isolated rat MSC (F) and conditioned media from VSMC transfected with Smad3 siRNA and treated with TGF-β. Data expressed as -fold change compared with conditioned media from VSMC transfected only with Lipofectamine; n = 3; *, p < 0.05.

To more specifically inhibit Smad3 function we developed a siRNA to rat Smad3. As shown in Fig. 3D, transient transfection of VSMC with Smad3 siRNA effectively down-regulated Smad3 expression. Furthermore, conditioned media derived from VSMC transiently transfected with Smad3 siRNA followed by stimulation with TGF-β produced significantly decreased total BM and MSC migration compared with conditioned media from VSMC transfected with scrambled siRNA (Fig. 3, E and F). Taken together, these results demonstrate that Smad3 is the signaling protein through which TGF-β mediates its effect on progenitor cell recruitment.

Identification of the Progenitor Cell Chemoattractant Released by VSMC in Response to TGF-β and Smad3

Our next goal was to determine the identity of the progenitor cell chemoattractant released by VSMC in response to TGF-β. To explore the possibilities, we performed a microarray analysis of TGF-β/AdSmad3-stimulated VSMC. Treatment with TGF-β/AdSmad3 increased by more than 4-fold the expression of 566 genes and decreased expression by at least 4-fold of 284 genes. The selected genes were clustered into groups that influence cell differentiation or cell growth using GeneSpringTM software. We were able to identify a number of known progenitor cell chemoattractants stimulated by TGF-β in Smad3-overexpressing cells, as summarized in Table 1. One of the most highly induced genes was that of MCP-1, with a greater than 80-fold induction. Because MCP-1 has been shown to attract neural progenitors cells to areas of tissue injury (27), we hypothesized that MCP-1 may be the critical factor that allows TGF-β-stimulated vascular SMC to function as a chemoattractant of bone marrow progenitor cells to sites of arterial injury.

TABLE 1.

Potential progenitor cell chemoattractants (-fold change)

RANTES, regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted.

Growth factors Chemokines Other molecules
VEGF (7.7) MCP-1 (83) Sphingosine kinase (3.2)
VEGF receptor (5.5) MCP-3 (37) Sphingosine-1 phosphate (1.4)
Platelet-derived growth factor (4.7) Interleukin-6 (8.5) Matrix metalloprotein-9 (1.4)
Fibroblast growth factor-2 (4.6) Interleukin-1 (4.4)
Insulin-like growth factor-1 (4) RANTES (3)
Stem cell factor (3.3)
TGF-β Induces VSMC Production of MCP-1 through Smad3

As shown in Fig. 4A, TGF-β stimulated the production of MCP-1 in RSMC in a dose-dependent manner. Smad3 overexpression via adenovirus-mediated gene transfer also increased the production of MCP-1, with further enhancement when Smad3-overexpressing cells were stimulated with TGF-β (Fig. 4B). To demonstrate that the increase in protein level was secondary to an increase in gene transcription, RT-PCR confirmed that TGF-β and Smad3 overexpression both increased expression of MCP-1 mRNA in VSMC (Fig. 4C).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

TGF-β, through Smad3 signaling, induces VSMC production of MCP-1. A, TGF-β induced VSMC production of MCP-1 in a dose-dependent manner, as shown by ELISA. B, enhancement of Smad3 signaling by infection with AdSmad3 also induced MCP-1 production and enhanced the stimulatory effect of TGF-β, as shown by both ELISA and RT-PCR (C). GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. D, blockade of Smad3 phosphorylation using SB431542 (10 μg/ml) inhibited TGF-β induced MCP-1 production as measured by ELISA. E, knockdown of Smad3 using a Smad3 siRNA also inhibited TGF-β induced MCP-1. (n = 4; *, p < 0.05 compared with control).

We next investigated the impact of inhibiting Smad3 signaling on TGF-β-induced MCP-1. As shown in Fig. 4D, inhibition of Smad2/3 phosphorylation using SB431542 (10 μg/ml) significantly blocked TGF-β-induced MCP-1 in both control RSMC and RSMC overexpressing Smad3. Furthermore, Smad3 siRNA also significantly decreased TGF-β-induced MCP-1 expression in RSMC (Fig. 4E).

MCP-1 Is an Important Chemokine for the Recruitment of Bone Marrow-derived Cells

To determine the role of MCP-1 in the recruitment of bone marrow cells and MSC, we first tested the effect of recombinant MCP-1 on total bone marrow cell and MSC migration. Fig. 5, A and B, show that recombinant MCP-1 markedly induced both total bone marrow cell and MSC chemotaxis. To further examine whether MCP-1 is necessary for the recruitment of bone marrow cells by VSMC treated with TGF-β and AdSmad3, we used a siRNA to silence MCP-1 expression in these cells. As shown in Fig. 5C, MCP-1-specific siRNA significantly reduced the amount of MCP-1 released by SMC treated with TGF-β, whereas scrambled siRNA had no significant effect. Inhibition of MCP-1 gene expression by the siRNA was also confirmed by RT-PCR (Fig. 5D). Transfection of MCP-1 siRNA into RSMC followed by stimulation of these cells with TGF-β/AdSmad3 significantly decreased the chemoattractive property of the conditioned media to both bone marrow cells and MSC, in comparison to conditioned media from cells treated with scramble siRNA (Fig. 5, E and F). These findings were confirmed by repeating identical studies with conditioned media from VSMC pretreated with an MCP-1 blocking antibody (Fig. 5, G and H). Specific inhibition of MCP-1 by MCP-1 antibody resulted in a 26 and 21% reduction in the chemoattractive properties of VSMC-conditioned media for total bone marrow cells and MSC, respectively, thus suggesting that MCP-1 is not the only progenitor cell chemoattractant induced by TGF-β/Smad3. This, however, is consistent with our gene array data, which shows that TGF-β/Smad3 induces several other potential progenitor cell chemoattractants, including vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor-2, and c-kit ligand (stem cell factor). Together, these data provide convincing evidence that MCP-1 is one of the critical factors released by SMC that mediates TGF-β induced chemoattraction of bone marrow progenitor cells.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

MCP-1 mediates TGF-β induced bone marrow and progenitor cell migration. Recombinant MCP-1 (20 ng/ml) induced both total bone marrow cell (A) and rat MSC migration (B) in chemotaxis assays. MCP-1 gene silencing using a MCP-1 siRNA inhibited TGF-β/Smad3-induced MCP-1 production both on MCP-1 ELISA (C) and RT-PCR (D). GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Conditioned media from VSMC treated first with MCP-1 siRNA, then AdSmad3 and TGF-β attracted fewer total bone marrow cells (E) and rat MSC (F) when compared with conditioned media from cells treated with control siRNA or no siRNA. The addition of an MCP-1 blocking antibody (Ab) to conditioned media from VSMC treated with AdSmad3 and TGF-β also attracted fewer total bone marrow cells (G) and rat MSC (H) when compared with conditioned media from VSMC treated with only AdSmad3 and TGF-β. n = 3; *, p < 0.05 compared with TGF-β or TGF-β/AdSmad3.

VSMC-conditioned Media Induces MSC to Express Smooth Muscle Cell Markers

In addition to a small percentage of progenitor cells, total bone marrow contains many cells that differentiate to the leukocyte and monocyte linage and are expected to be recruited by MCP-1. To show that MCP-1 not only induces progenitor cell chemotaxis but can also induce progenitor cell differentiation into smooth muscle-like cells, MSC were cultured with conditioned media derived from VSMC treated with or without TGF-β or AdSmad3. After 3 days of exposure to conditioned media, the morphology of treated MSC changed significantly to resemble SMC (Fig. 6, A–C). Cellular protein levels of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), calponin, and desmin were determined by Western blotting. As shown in Fig. 6D, the expression levels of α-SMA, calponin, and desmin in MSC were significantly increased in response to treatment with conditioned media derived from VSMC treated with TGF-β and AdSmad3. TGF-β itself did not have a significant effect on VSMC morphology or on expression of α-SMA or calponin (Fig. 6E).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

Conditioned media from VSMC stimulated with TGF-β induces MSC differentiation into SMC. MSC were cultured in conditioned media from RSMC (A), VSMC treated with TGF-β (B), or VSMC treated with TGF-β/AdSmad3 (C) for 3 days. (D) MSC were treated with conditioned media from RSMC for 3 days. Protein lysates were analyzed by Western blotting using antibodies against α-SMA, calponin, and desmin. Tubulin served as a loading control. E, MSC were treated with or without TGF-β (5 μg/ml) for 3 days, and protein lysates were analyzed by Western blotting using antibodies against α-SMA, calponin, and β-tubulin.

Smad3 Overexpression in Vivo Increases MCP-1 Expression by VSMC after Injury

We next turned to the rat carotid balloon injury model to test our hypothesis in vivo that TGF-β through Smad3 signaling stimulates SMC production of MCP-1. Smad3 was overexpressed via adenovirus-mediated gene transfer in rat carotid arteries after balloon injury, and MCP-1 expression was evaluated immunohistochemically. We have previously shown that overexpression of Smad3 after arterial injury produces an intense neointimal response. We found that MCP-1 expression was significantly increased at day 5 after injury in arteries infected with AdSmad3 as compared with those infected with AdNull (Fig. 7, A–C). This in vivo finding confirms our in vitro results showing that Smad3 overexpression stimulates production of MCP-1 by VSMC.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7.

Up-regulation of Smad3 in vivo increases MCP-1 expression and injury of arteries induce migration of BM in the arterial wall. A and B, MCP-1 IHC in rat carotid arteries 5 days after balloon injury and infection with AdNull or AdSmad3. C, semiquantitative immunohistochemistry showing increased MCP-1 expression in arteries infected with AdSmad3. *, p < 0.05. D and E, after implantation of PKH26-labeled BM in rat circulation for 24 h, PKH26-labeled BM (white arrowheads) are observed in uninjured arteries (C) but not in injured arteries (D).

Bone Marrow Cells Migrate to Areas of Arterial Wall Injury

We then examined whether arterial injury induces migration of BM cells into carotid arteries in vivo after injury. Bone marrow cells were labeled and injected systemically at the time of injury as described under “Experimental Procedures.” As shown in Fig. 7, D and E, few labeled bone marrow cells were observed in injured arteries but not in uninjured arteries.

PKCδ Signaling Pathway Is Necessary for TGF-β Stimulation of MCP-1

Although Smad3 is a critical signaling protein for TGF-β, several studies have previously shown that TGF-β can also signal through the ubiquitous kinase, PKCδ (28–30). Moreover, our previous data suggest that there may be cross-talk between the PKCδ and Smad3 pathways (2). To test whether PKCδ plays a role in TGF-β-induced MCP-1 expression, we first examined the effect of a general inhibitor of PKC, Ro 32-0432, on TGF-β-induced MCP-1 production. At a concentration of 1–10 μm, Ro 32-0432 has been shown to block PKC-dependent activities in whole cells (31). As shown in Fig. 8, A and B, Ro 32-0432 prevented both TGF-β- and TGF-β/AdSmad3-induced MCP-1 production in a dose-dependent manner, with complete inhibition at 5–10 μm. VSMC were then treated with TGF-β and AdSmad3 in the absence and presence of the selective PKCδ inhibitor, rotterlin, which has an IC50 of 3–6 μm for PKCδ (32). As shown in Fig. 8C, pretreatment with rotterlin prevented TGF-β/AdSmad3- induction of MCP-1. To further confirm the involvement of PKCδ in the generation of MCP-1, we infected RSMC with an adenovirus expressing PKCδ (AdPKCδ) or AdNull and found that overexpression of PKCδ significantly induced MCP-1 production (Fig. 8D).

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8.

Inhibition of PKC prevents TGF-β/Smad3-induced MCP-1 expression by RSMC. A, MCP-1 ELISA showing inhibition of TGF-β/Smad3-induced MCP-1 after pretreatment with the PKC inhibitor Ro-32-0432 (5 μm). B, the effect of Ro-32-0432 was dose-dependent (concentration in μm). C, MCP-1 ELISA showing inhibition of TGF-β/Smad3-induced MCP-1 by the PKCδ-specific inhibitor rotterlin (concentration in μm). D, conversely, overexpression of PKCδ alone induces MCP-1 expression in RSMC. Chemotaxis assays using conditioned media from VSMC pretreated with rotterlin (2 μm) then stimulated with TGF-β/AdSmad3 showed that inhibition of PKCδ decreased the chemoattractive properties of conditioned media for both total bone marrow cells (E) and rat MSC (F) (n = 3). *, p < 0.05.

To determine whether PKCδ is necessary for TGF-β/AdSmad3-induced recruitment of bone marrow progenitor cells, we pretreated AdSmad3-infected VSMC with rotterlin followed by stimulation with TGF-β. Conditioned media from SMC pretreated with rotterlin induced significantly less BM cell or MSC migration compared with control-conditioned media (Fig. 8, E and F). Taken together, these data suggest that PKCδ signal transduction is necessary for TGF-β/Smad3-induced MCP-1 expression as well as the recruitment of bone marrow progenitor cells by TGF-β.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest a potential mechanism for the profound effect of TGF-β on intimal hyperplasia after arterial injury. TGF-β is known as a pro-fibrotic cytokine; consequently, induction of extracellular matrix and collagen deposition by TGF-β has been proposed as one of the mechanisms to explain the enhancing effect of TGF-β on intimal hyperplasia. Contradicting this hypothesis, it has been shown repeatedly that the neointimal lesion in animal models is cellular and composed primarily of SMC rather than extracellular matrix (33–35). We have recently reported that TGF-β, in the presence of Smad3 up-regulation that occurs in VSMC after arterial injury, is a stimulant of SMC proliferation. This may partially account for the accumulation of VSMC after vascular injury. Recently, an important role for progenitor cells in the development of the neointimal lesion has also been proposed. We, therefore, explored whether the stimulatory effect of TGF-β on intimal hyperplasia might also be mediated through the recruitment of progenitor cells to the site of arterial injury.

In this study we have made three novel findings. First, we have found that TGF-β, through a direct action on VSMC, is able to stimulate bone marrow or mesenchymal stem cell chemotaxis. We have also shown that this effect is mediated at least in part through Smad3 signaling and the release of MCP-1 from VSMC. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that the PKCδ signaling pathway is also necessary for TGF-β/Smad3-induced MCP-1 production, suggesting cross-talk between Smad3 and PKCδ.

The role of MCP-1 as a key mediator of neointimal hyperplasia has previously been described. However, the proposed mechanism by which MCP-1 produces this effect is believed to be through the recruitment of leukocytes to the site of injury. Studies have shown that arterial injury is associated with a rapid but transient adherence of leukocytes to the arterial wall. However, in normolipemic animals, leukocytes do not accumulate in the arterial wall after vascular injury (33). Moreover, previous studies using rodent models of balloon arterial injury have shown that there is no significant accumulation of macrophages in the arterial wall and that the majority of cells comprising the neointima are smooth muscle cells (19, 33). Despite this, blocking MCP-1 has still been described to inhibit intimal hyperplasia. Genetic deletion of CCR2, the receptor for MCP-1, has been reported to reduce intimal hyperplasia by 61.4% after femoral artery wire injury in a mouse (33). Interestingly, this was ascribed to a decrease in early SMC proliferation in CCR2−/− mice and not to a decrease in the number of macrophages present in the neoinitmal lesion. Even at very early time points after injury (1 h up to 5 days), there were essentially no macrophages (<2/section) in both CCR2+/+ or CCR2−/− mice. The forgoing suggest an important role for MCP-1 in the development of intimal hyperplasia; however, the mechanism for this effect is unclear and perhaps not related to chemoattraction of leukocytes. Our studies provide an alternative hypothesis for the action of MCP-1. The neointimal response produced by MCP-1 may be the consequence of chemoattraction of bone marrow progenitor cells into the vascular lesion that ultimately differentiate into SMC.

The contribution of BMPC to the neointimal lesion has been well described (3–5, 33), however, characterization of the progenitor cells is still controversial. Initial studies suggested that hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) may differentiate into SMC or endothelial cells; however, later studies have suggested that transdifferentiation of HSC into non-hematopoietic cells is a rare event (6, 36–39). On the other hand, bone marrow-derived MSC in both in vivo and in vitro models (40, 41) have been reported to migrate to sites of tissue damage (42) and differentiate into smooth muscle cells. Our results also suggest that factors secreted by SMC can induce MSC differentiation into SMC (Fig. 6). Because TGF-β stimulates the production of multiple factors by SMC (Table 1), it is yet to be determined whether MCP-1 specifically is the factor that drives MSC differentiation. However, our results do emphasize the effect of TGF-β on SMC; not only does TGF-β stimulate SMC to secrete progenitor cell chemoattractants but also factors that drive progenitor cell differentiation into more SMC.

Other studies have also demonstrated that MSC specifically are attracted to sites of tissue injury. Schenk et al. (9) reported that MSC transiently home to the myocardium after acute myocardial infarction, thereby improving cardiac remodeling, and that MCP-3 acts as a MSC homing factor. Moreover, MCP-1 and MCP-3 both bind to the same receptor, CCR2 (43), and MSC express this receptor. Therefore, it is not surprising that we now find that MCP-1, like MCP-3, has the ability to attract bone marrow MSC. Previous studies in other systems have evaluated the role of MCP-1 as a chemoattractant of MSC. MSC have been shown to migrate toward ischemic rat cerebral tissue extracts; migration was inhibited when the tissue extracts were preincubated with an MCP-1 blocking antibody (10). Furthermore, breast cancer cells have also been shown to secrete MCP-1, which in turn attracts MSC to tumors (44). Contradicting these findings are those of Ringe et al. (45) who reported that MSC did not migrate toward recombinant MCP-1 over a wide range of concentrations. Our current findings suggest that MCP-1, at least in the vascular system, can function as a potent chemoattractant of mesenchymal stem cells. TGF-β appears to mediate its effect on MCP-1 through Smad3. This is evident from our in vitro studies; as well, in vivo levels of MCP-1 are increased in the arterial wall of Smad3-overexpressing animals after injury. Although this mechanism has not been previously described in SMC, in human endothelial cells TGF-β has also been shown to induce MCP-1 through Smad3 signaling (46). In these studies promoter analysis revealed the presence of a Smad binding element in the MCP-1 promoter that was required for endothelial cells to respond to TGF-β. Conversely, some authors have found that TGF-β, through Smad3 signaling, inhibits MCP-1 expression. In a mouse macrophage cell line (47), examination of the MCP-1 promoter failed to reveal a Smad3 binding site. However, Smad3 was found to bind to c-Jun, a member of the AP-1 family, prevent c-Jun binding to the MCP-1 promoter, and consequently inhibit promoter activation. These results suggest that the effects of TGF-β on MCP-1 gene expression are cell-specific.

Conditioned media derived from rat VSMC treated with TGF-β significantly enhances bone marrow and mesenchymal cell migration, albeit the effect is only ∼30%. This effect is further enhanced in SMC overexpressing Smad3. It is always difficult to translate in vitro findings to in vivo. Local concentrations of TGF-β or MCP-1 might be greater in vivo, further enhancing our observed effect on migration. Alternatively concentrations of both proteins might be less in vivo, and the observations made in these experiments may be physiologically irrelevant. Interestingly, bone marrow or mesenchymal stem cells, even if few in number, have the potential to differentiate into multiple cell types in vivo, such as endothelial or smooth muscle cells, which in turn can lead to a cascade of events that do have physiologic significance. Moreover, assay methods of cell migration may underestimate the chemotactic effect of conditioned media, as control media itself also induces some degree of spontaneous cell migration. Therefore, we believe that although conditioned media derived from VSMC treated in vitro with TGF-β did not induce robust changes in bone marrow cell migration, this effect may have significant biological consequences in vivo.

Of note, down-regulation of Smad3 using an siRNA to Smad3 caused a partial but significant decrease in the chemoattractive properties of conditioned media from SMC treated with TGF-β but a much more dramatic decrease in MCP-1 production. As shown in our gene array data (Table 1), stimulation of RSMC with TGF-β/AdSmad3 affected the expression of numerous genes; whereas the genes for many cytokines and pro-angiogenic factors were induced, many others were inhibited, including the gene for SDF-1α. It is possible that concurrent with the induction in MCP-1 gene expression, stimulation with TGF-β resulted in a decrease in other progenitor cell chemoattractants, such as SDF-1α, that partially opposed the effect of MCP-1. The partial effect of Smad3 siRNA could also be caused by an incomplete “knock-down” of Smad3 expression, which is often associated with this approach. Alternatively, this result could suggest that TGF-β signals through additional pathways within SMC, such as Smad2 or a Smad-independent pathway. Having shown that Smad3 is a critical mediator of TGF-β induced MCP-1, it was therefore surprising to find that inhibition of PKCδ could completely block TGF-β-induced MCP-1 expression as well as progenitor cell chemotaxis. These findings suggest that PKCδ may play a key role in MCP-1 expression. Moreover, PKCδ may act as a critical downstream component of TGF-β/Smad3 signaling in VSMC. We have recently found that PKCδ is required for induced MCP-1 expression in macrophages. Likewise, PKCδ may be necessary for MCP-1 expression in VSMC independent of TGF-β/Smad3 signaling. Alternatively, we and others have previously described cross-talk between PKCδ and Smad3 in VSMC (2, 28). It has been reported that phosphorylation of serine residues in the MH1 domain of Smad3 by PKCδ alters the DNA binding properties of Smad3 (48). Therefore, it is possible that PKCδ-mediated phosphorylation of Smad3 is required for TGF-β/Smad3-induced MCP-1 expression in SMC. This hypothesis will be explored in future studies.

In conclusion, our data suggest a novel mechanism through which TGF-β stimulates production of MCP-1 in VSMC. We have demonstrated that TGF-β, acting on VSMC, induces progenitor cell chemotaxis and progenitor cell differentiation into smooth muscle-like cells. Furthermore, we have shown that the pathway through which TGF-β produces this effect involves Smad3, protein kinase C-δ, and MCP-1. Taken together, these results provide new insight into the intricacies and consequences of TGF-β and its effects on the arterial wall. Manipulation of this signaling system and its effects on progenitor cell chemotaxis may provide a novel approach to the inhibition of intimal hyperplasia.

*

This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant F32 HL088818-01 (to S. T.) and Public Health Service Grant R01 HL-68673 (NHLBI, to K. K. and B. L.). The work was also supported by American Heart Association Grant-in-aid 0455859T (to B. L.) and a Society of University Surgeons-Ethicon Scholarship Grant Award (to S. T.).

3
The abbreviations used are:
VSMC
vascular smooth muscle cell(s)
SMC
smooth muscle cell(s)
BMPC
bone marrow (BM)-derived progenitor cell(s)
RSMC
rat SMC(s)
MSC
mesenchymal stem cell
Ad
adenovirus
SDF-1α
stromal-derived factor-1α
MCP
monocyte chemoattractant protein
TGF-β
transforming growth factor-β
DMEM
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
FBS
fetal bovine serum
ELISA
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
PKC
protein kinase C
GFP
green fluorescent protein
siRNA
small interfering RNA
RT
reverse transcription
α-SMA
α-smooth muscle actin.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Newby A. C., Zaltsman A. B. ( 2000) J. Pathol. 190, 300– 309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ryer E. J., Hom R. P., Sakakibara K., Nakayama K. I., Nakayama K., Faries P. L., Liu B., Kent K. C. ( 2006) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 26, 780– 786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zernecke A., Schober A., Bot I., von Hundelshausen P., Liehn E. A., Möpps B., Mericskay M., Gierschik P., Biessen E. A., Weber C. ( 2005) Circ. Res. 96, 784– 791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Massberg S., Konrad I., Schürzinger K., Lorenz M., Schneider S., Zohlnhoefer D., Hoppe K., Schiemann M., Kennerknecht E., Sauer S., Schulz C., Kerstan S., Rudelius M., Seidl S., Sorge F., Langer H., Peluso M., Goyal P., Vestweber D., Emambokus N. R., Busch D. H., Frampton J., Gawaz M. ( 2006) J. Exp. Med. 203, 1221– 1233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang C. H., Anderson N., Li S. H., Szmitko P. E., Cherng W. J., Fedak P. W., Fazel S., Li R. K., Yau T. M., Weisel R. D., Stanford W. L., Verma S. ( 2006) Circ. Res. 99, 617– 625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sata M., Saiura A., Kunisato A., Tojo A., Okada S., Tokuhisa T., Hirai H., Makuuchi M., Hirata Y., Nagai R. ( 2002) Nat. Med. 8, 403– 409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tanaka K., Sata M., Hirata Y., Nagai R. ( 2003) Circ. Res. 93, 783– 790 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tsai S., Butler J., Rafii S., Liu B., Kent K. C. ( 2009) J. Vasc. Surg. 49, 502– 510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schenk S., Mal N., Finan A., Zhang M., Kiedrowski M., Popovic Z., McCarthy P. M., Penn M. S. ( 2007) Stem Cells 25, 245– 251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang L., Li Y., Chen J., Gautam S. C., Zhang Z., Lu M., Chopp M. ( 2002) Exp. Hematol. 30, 831– 836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang C. H., Cherng W. J., Yang N. I., Kuo L. T., Hsu C. M., Yeh H. I., Lan Y. J., Yeh C. H., Stanford W. L. ( 2008) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 28, 54– 60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nikol S., Isner J. M., Pickering J. G., Kearney M., Leclerc G., Weir L. ( 1992) J. Clin. Invest. 90, 1582– 1592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ryan S. T., Koteliansky V. E., Gotwals P. J., Lindner V. ( 2003) J. Vasc. Res. 40, 37– 46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kanzaki T., Tamura K., Takahashi K., Saito Y., Akikusa B., Oohashi H., Kasayuki N., Ueda M., Morisaki N. ( 1995) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15, 1951– 1957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wolf Y. G., Rasmussen L. M., Ruoslahti E. ( 1994) J. Clin. Invest. 93, 1172– 1178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Derynck R., Zhang Y. E. ( 2003) Nature 425, 577– 584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.ten Dijke P., Hill C. S. ( 2004) Trends Biochem. Sci. 29, 265– 273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Charo I. F., Taubman M. B. ( 2004) Circ. Res. 95, 858– 866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Furukawa Y., Matsumori A., Ohashi N., Shioi T., Ono K., Harada A., Matsushima K., Sasayama S. ( 1999) Circ. Res. 84, 306– 314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Egashira K., Zhao Q., Kataoka C., Ohtani K., Usui M., Charo I. F., Nishida K., Inoue S., Katoh M., Ichiki T., Takeshita A. ( 2002) Circ. Res. 90, 1167– 1172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Simper D., Stalboerger P. G., Panetta C. J., Wang S., Caplice N. M. ( 2002) Circulation 106, 1199– 1204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhao Y., Glesne D., Huberman E. ( 2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 2426– 2431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Clowes M. M., Lynch C. M., Miller A. D., Miller D. G., Osborne W. R., Clowes A. W. ( 1994) J. Clin. Invest. 93, 644– 651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hollenbeck S. T., Sakakibara K., Faries P. L., Workhu B., Liu B., Kent K. C. ( 2004) J. Surg. Res. 120, 288– 294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Clowes A. W., Reidy M. A., Clowes M. M. ( 1983) Lab. Invest. 49, 208– 215 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ryer E. J., Sakakibara K., Wang C., Sarkar D., Fisher P. B., Faries P. L., Kent K. C., Liu B. ( 2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 35310– 35317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Belmadani A., Tran P. B., Ren D., Miller R. J. ( 2006) J. Neurosci. 26, 3182– 3191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Runyan C. E., Schnaper H. W., Poncelet A. C. ( 2003) Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 285, F413– 422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang L., Keane M. P., Zhu L. X., Sharma S., Rozengurt E., Strieter R. M., Dubinett S. M., Huang M. ( 2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 28315– 28319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kamiya K., Ryer E., Sakakibara K., Zohlman A., Kent K. C., Liu B. ( 2007) J. Surg. Res. 141, 91– 96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wilkinson S. E., Parker P. J., Nixon J. S. ( 1993) Biochem. J. 294, 335– 337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gschwendt M., Müller H. J., Kielbassa K., Zang R., Kittstein W., Rincke G., Marks F. ( 1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 199, 93– 98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Roque M., Kim W. J., Gazdoin M., Malik A., Reis E. D., Fallon J. T., Badimon J. J., Charo I. F., Taubman M. B. ( 2002) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 22, 554– 559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Reidy M. A., Fingerle J., Lindner V. ( 1992) Circulation 86, III43– 46 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Clowes A. W., Clowes M. M., Fingerle J., Reidy M. A. ( 1989) J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 14, Suppl. 6, S12– 15 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Iwata H., Sata M. ( 2007) Front Biosci. 12, 4157– 4167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wagers A. J., Sherwood R. I., Christensen J. L., Weissman I. L. ( 2002) Science 297, 2256– 2259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Balsam L. B., Wagers A. J., Christensen J. L., Kofidis T., Weissman I. L., Robbins R. C. ( 2004) Nature 428, 668– 673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sahara M., Sata M., Matsuzaki Y., Tanaka K., Morita T., Hirata Y., Okano H., Nagai R. ( 2005) Stem Cells 23, 874– 878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Abedin M., Tintut Y., Demer L. L. ( 2004) Circ. Res. 95, 671– 676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kashiwakura Y., Katoh Y., Tamayose K., Konishi H., Takaya N., Yuhara S., Yamada M., Sugimoto K., Daida H. ( 2003) Circulation 107, 2078– 2081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Devine S. M., Bartholomew A. M., Mahmud N., Nelson M., Patil S., Hardy W., Sturgeon C., Hewett T., Chung T., Stock W., Sher D., Weissman S., Ferrer K., Mosca J., Deans R., Moseley A., Hoffman R. ( 2001) Exp. Hematol. 29, 244– 255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Combadiere C., Ahuja S. K., Van Damme J., Tiffany H. L., Gao J. L., Murphy P. M. ( 1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29671– 29675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dwyer R. M., Potter-Beirne S. M., Harrington K. A., Lowery A. J., Hennessy E., Murphy J. M., Barry F. P., O'Brien T., Kerin M. J. ( 2007) Clin. Cancer Res. 13, 5020– 5027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ringe J., Strassburg S., Neumann K., Endres M., Notter M., Burmester G. R., Kaps C., Sittinger M. ( 2007) J. Cell. Biochem. 101, 135– 146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ma J., Wang Q., Fei T., Han J. D., Chen Y. G. ( 2007) Blood 109, 987– 994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Feinberg M. W., Shimizu K., Lebedeva M., Haspel R., Takayama K., Chen Z., Frederick J. P., Wang X. F., Simon D. I., Libby P., Mitchell R. N., Jain M. K. ( 2004) Circ. Res. 94, 601– 608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yakymovych I., Ten Dijke P., Heldin C. H., Souchelnytskyi S. ( 2001) FASEB J. 15, 553– 555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES