Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1997 May;3(3):276–287.

Table 5.

Association of MRI variables with severity of neuropsychological impairment

NP impairment subgroup means
Controls
No impairment
(GIS 0–1)*
Mild-to-moderate
impairment
(GIS 2–5)
Severe
impairment
(GIS ≥ 6)
Linear trend analysis
MRI variable M ± SD M ± SD M ± SD M ± SD Effect size
(% var)†
F p
Ventricular CSF percent 4.8 ± 0.9 5.6 ± 1.3 6.9 ± 1.9 5.7 ± 2.0 6.7 3.02 .091
Sulcal CSF percent 5.1 ± 0.9 5.4 ± 1.2 6.8 ± 1.7 5.9 ± 1.3 8.7 4.02 .052
Gray matter percent 40.5 ± 2.6 40.3 ± 3.3 37.7 ± 2.8 38.6 ± 3.4 9.4 4.03 .052
White matter percent 46.2 ± 2.0 45.5 ± 3.0 45.6 ± 2.0 46.1 ± 2.6 0.0 0.0 .98
WMSH (% of white matter) 5.3 ± 3.1 4.7 ± 2.3 3.8 ± 1.7 6.5 ± 4.9 0.8 0.30 .58
Caudate volume (pixels) 306 ± 25.8 282 ± 40.1 282 ± 26.2 282 ± 25.0 8.7 3.71 .062
*

GIS: Global Impairment Score.

†

Percent of variance of MRI variables accounted for by increasing severity of NP impairment.