Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 14.
Published in final edited form as: Obes Rev. 2009 Mar 6;10(3):333–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00567.x

Table 3.

Results from univariable models to predict attrition at 1 year.

Attrition
Independent Variable Total AE-Related Non-AE-Related
Treatment p < .0001 p = .05 p < .001
 Placebo 34.9 ± 2.4a 6.2 ± 0.8a 30.5 ± 2.5a
 Orlistat 28.6 ± 2.5b 7.8 ± 1.0a 22.9 ± 2.6b
 Sibutramine 28.3 ± 3.3bc 8.1 ± 1.8ac 22.9 ± 3.9b
 Rimonabant 35.1 ± 3.2ac 11.0 ± 1.6bc 25.3 ± 3.6ab
Lead-In Period p = .05 p = .69 p = .002
 Yes 29.1 ± 2.6a 8.4 ± 0.9 22.0 + 2.1a
 No 39.9 ± 4.5b 7.8 ± 1.4 36.2 ± 3.6b
Comorbidity as Inclusion Criterion p = .06 p = .61 p = .05
 Yes 26.9 ± 3.3 8.7 ± 1.1 20.7 ± 3.1a
 No 35.9 ± 3.1 7.9 ± 1.0 29.9 ± 3.0b
Study Location p = .10 p = .93 p = .27
 North America 38.8 ± 4.1 8.6 ± 1.4 31.1 ± 4.3
 Europe 27.3 ± 3.2 7.9 ± 1.1 22.0 ± 3.5
 Other 32.6 ± 4.8 8.3 ± 1.5 24.7 ± 4.6
Number of Study Visits p = .19 p = .97 p = .11
Number of Lifestyle Visits p = .80 p = .17 p = .26
Women in Study Group (%) p = .02 p = .32 p = .01
Mean Age of Study Group p = .14 p = .92 p = .13
Mean Body Mass Index of Study Group p = .40 p = .04 p = .05

Note. The p values reported refer to the significance of each independent variable. For categorical variables, mean attrition rates (± standard errors) also are reported for each subgroup. Within each type of attrition, subgroup means marked with different subscripts were significantly different from each other at p < .05.