Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Methods. 2009 Jan 14;47(3):177–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.12.003

Table 2.

Predominant base-pairing interactions in RNA helical structures.†

Base pair Hydrogen bonds Sign Saenger Leontis-Westhof Number
Canonical
G·C Watson-Crick N2-H··· O2 2.79 (0.17) − XIX cis W/W 9500×0.90
O6· · ·H-N4 2.92 (0.18)
N1-H· · ·N3 2.89 (0.13)
A·U Watson-Crick N1· · ·H-N3 2.84 (0.14) − XX cis W/W 3069×0.93
N6-H· · ·O4 2.97 (0.18)
Non-canonical
G·U wobble N1-H· · ·O2 2.79(0.16) − XXVIII cis W/W 1049×0.69
O6· · ·H-N3 2.85(0.16)
G·A sheared N2-H· · ·N7 2.89(0.17) + XI trans H/S 509×0.59
N3· · ·H-N6 3.03(0.18)
A·U Hoogsteen N6-H· · ·O2 2.91(0.21) + XXIII trans H/W 354×0.71
N7· · ·H-N3 2.90(0.17)
U·U wobble O2· · ·H-N3 2.95(0.24) − XVI cis W/W 185×0.54
N3-H· · ·O4 2.87(0.15)
G·A Watson-Crick N1-H· · ·N1 2.84(0.17) − VIII cis W/W 141×0.85
O6· · ·H-N6 2.91(0.20)
†

Base pairs described in column 2 by the nomenclature introduced by Lee and Gutell [36] and grouped in columns 6–8 into the structural classes anticipated by Saenger [14] and employed by Leontis and Westhof [23] (see text for details). Hydrogen bonds described in column 4 by the mean values and standard deviations (subscripted values in parentheses) of the distances, in Ångstrom units, between the designated proton donor-acceptor pairs. The signs in column 5, i.e., − or +, respectively denote whether the interacting bases form a pair with opposing faces or share the same face [15]. The entries in the last column correspond to the number of base pairs of a given type and the fraction of those pairs (subscripted numbers expressed as multiplicative factors) with the hydrogen-bonding pattern specified in column 3.