Abstract
Identification of a reliable marker of skeletal precursor cells within calcified and soft tissues remains a major challenge for the field. To address this, we used a transgenic model in which osteoblasts can be eliminated by pharmacological treatment. Following osteoblast ablation a dramatic increase in a population of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) positive cells was observed. During early recovery phase from ablation we have detected cells with the simultaneous expression of SMAA and a preosteoblastic 3.6GFP marker, indicating the potential for transition of α-SMA+ cells towards osteoprogenitor lineage. Utilizing α-SMAGFP transgene, α-SMAGFP+ positive cells were detected in the microvasculature and in the osteoprogenitor population within bone marrow stromal cells. Osteogenic and adipogenic induction stimulated expression of bone and fat markers in the α-SMAGFP+ population derived from bone marrow or adipose tissue. In adipose tissue, α-SMA+ cells were localized within the smooth muscle cell layer and in pericytes. After in vitro expansion, α-SMA+/CD45−/Sca1+ progenitors were highly enriched. Following cell sorting and transplantation of expanded pericyte/myofibroblast populations, donor-derived differentiated osteoblasts and new bone formation was detected. Our results show that cells with a pericyte/myofibroblast phenotype have the potential to differentiate into functional osteoblasts.
Keywords: myofibroblast, pericyte, osteoblast, adult progenitor cell, GFP
INTRODUCTION
Mature osteoblasts are responsible for the new bone formation and are major players in achieving an adequate balance between bone resorption and formation. Therefore, the burden of maintenance of bone mass depends not only on the function of mature osteoblasts but also on the ability of mesenchymal progenitor cells to generate sufficient numbers of osteoblasts as well. Cells with the properties of mesenchymal stem cell may be present within the bone marrow and other tissues, but it is not yet possible to identify and isolate this population of progenitor cells.
The osteoprogenitor lineage is one of the cell populations that form by the process of maturation from mesenchymal stem cells [1, 2]. Currently, identification of cells at different stages of osteoblast maturation is defined by the temporal expression of various bone markers. Commitment to pre-osteoblasts can be detected by expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteopontin, while more mature and bone matrix producing osteoblasts express bone sialoprotein and osteocalcin (OC) [3]. A number of cell surface epitopes have been proposed as markers to identify and isolate progenitor cells within the lineage. To define each stage of progenitor cell differentiation a number of markers have been identified. However, these markers vary significantly between species, and are likely to identify partially overlapping populations of progenitors at different levels of maturation. In human bone marrow stromal cells the most characterized has been a cell surface marker STRO1 [4, 5], shown to precede the expression of preosteoblastic and osteoblastic alkaline phosphatase [6]. Other markers identifying a population of progenitors in human bone marrow stromal cells are Alcam/CD166 (SB-10) [7, 8], a member of the tetraspan family of cell surface glycoproteins CD63 (HOP-26) [9, 10]. A more recent study showed that a progenitor population exhibits simultaneous expression of HOP-26, CD166 and CD49a and has the ability to form CFU-F colonies [11, 12]. In addition a population of cells localized to subendothelial areas within the bone marrow has been shown to have osteoprogenitor phenotype. These cells are marked by high expression of melanoma-associated cell adhesion molecule MCAM/CD146 and exhibit potential for self-renewal and osteogenic differentiation [13].
The applicability of markers identified in human cells to murine stromal cells has been limited, so additional markers have been acquired to identify murine mesenchymal stem cells. Besides Alcam, [14] of particular interest is stem cell antigen 1, Ly6 (Sca1), a cell surface glycoprotein that appears to be an active participant in the stem cell renewal process [15]. However, availability and usefulness of cell surface markers in mesenchymal stem cell biology has never approached the level of utility that has been developed in the hematopoietic field. This lack of optimal markers has slowed the studies determining which mesenchymal lineages are formed in vivo from isolated and defined mesenchymal progenitor cells.
In this study we show that a population of cells present within the bone marrow stromal cells and adipose tissue expresses other markers characteristic of mesenchymal progenitor cells. This population with myofibroblast/pericyte phenotype has ability to expand in vitro and generate functional and mature osteoblast lineage cells after transplantation into an osteogenic in vivo environment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental mouse models
Osteoblast ablation model
The Col2.3Δtk mouse harbors a truncated version of the tk gene under the control of a 2.3 kb segment of the rat collagen type I promoter gene [16]. Utilizing this transgenic mouse we can selectively eliminate mature cells within osteoprogenitor lineage. To achieve this, 6–7 week old mice were injected intraperitoneally with 8 mg/kg/d of gancyclovir (Cytovene-IV; Roche Pharmaceutical, Nutley, NJ, USA) twice daily for 16-days. After the discontinuation of treatment, experimental mice were allowed to recover. During the entire experimental procedure, all mice were provided with crushed food and sacrificed at time point of 0, 4, 7, 12,17, 21 and 28 days of recovery.
Osteoblast lineage directed markers
To define cells as mature osteoblasts we utilized a transgenic mouse in which a 2.3 kb collagen type I promoter directs the expression of cyan or emerald variants of GFP to mature osteoblast lineage cells (Col2.3GFP(green) or Col2.3CFP(blue) [17, 18]. Col3.6GFPtpz directs expression to cells at the stage of a preosteoblast in vitro, and to periosteal fibroblasts. Following osteogenic induction, Col3.6GFP cells have the potential to differentiate into mature osteoblasts. We crossed homozygous Col2.3Δtk mice with either homozygous Col3.6GFP or homozygous Col2.3GFP mice. Animals heterozygous for both transgenes (tk and GFP) were used.
Pericyte directed GFP expression
To identify the pericyte population we utilized a smooth muscle alpha actin promoter (termed SMP8) to direct the expression of enhanced GFP, a transgenic model developed by Dr. Jen-Yue Tsai [19, 20].
Histological and μ-CT analysis of bone
Paraffin histological methods
Femurs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at +4°C for 7 days. Following fixation, they were decalcified in 15% ethylene-diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 3–4 days at room temperature, dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol and cleared in xylene. Samples were embedded in paraffin (paraplast X-TRA tissue embedding medium, Fisher, Pittsburg) at 56°C and 5 µm thick sections were deparaffinized in xylene, hydrated in descending concentrations of ethanol and 2 mM MgCl2 in PBS. Glycerol/PBS mounted slides were examined by fluorescent microscopy using dual FITC/Texas red filter cube of the Zeiss Axioplan 200 microscope [21]. The same sections were subsequently stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
μ-CT analysis
Analysis of bone geometry is performed at the University of Connecticut Health Center μ-CT facility. Mouse femur morphometry was assessed using conebeam micro-focus X-ray computed tomography (µCT40, Scanco Medical AG, Bassersdorf, Switzerland). Serial tomographic images were acquired at 55 kV and 145 µA, collecting 1000 projections per rotation at 300 msec integration time. Three-dimensional 16-bit grayscale images were reconstructed using standard convolution back-projection algorithms with Shepp and Logan filtering, and rendered within a 12.3 mm field of view at a discrete density of 578,704 voxels/mm3 (isometric 12-µm voxels). Segmentation of bone from marrow and soft tissue was performed in conjunction with a constrained Gaussian filter to reduce noise, applying a hydroxyapatite-equivalent density threshold of 470 mg/cm3. Three mice were used per time period.
RNA extraction and Northern blot analysis
Animals were sacrificed with CO2 asphyxiation and epiphyseal portions of the long bones (tibia and femur) were cleaned of attached muscle prior to freezing. Total RNA was prepared using TRI Reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using a previously described modification [17]. RNA was separated on a 2.2 M formaldehyde/1% agarose gel and transferred onto a nylon membrane (Maximum Strength Nytran Plus, Schleicher & Schuell). Membranes were probed with the 900 bp PstI fragment of rat Col1a1 (pα1R2)[22], a 440 bp mouse OC fragment (p923)[23], and 1000 bp mouse BSP and osteopontin (OP) fragments[24]. Probes were radiolabeled by the random primer method using (α-32P) dCTP (New England Nuclear, 3000 Ci/mmol) to obtain probes with specific activities of approximately 1×109 cpm/µg. Filters were hybridized with 3 ×106 cpm/ml 32P-labeled probe at 42°C in 50% formamide, 5×SSPE (1×SSPE = 0.149M NaCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4), 1.2 × Denhardt's and 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate and washed according to published procedures[25].
Histological evaluation of GFP expression, immunofluorescence and histochemical stainings
Preparation of cryosections
Bones were fixed for 3–4 days in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS (pH 7.4) at 4°C and decalcified 3 days as described above. Thereafter they were placed in 30% sucrose/PBS overnight and embedded in frozen specimen embedding media (Cryomatrix, ThermoShandon, Pittsburgh, USA) at −60°C. Adipose tissues were fixed overnight and placed in sucrose overnight and then embedded and cryosectioned. Bones and soft tissues were cryosectioned in 5µm sections using a CryoJane tape transfer system (Instrumedics, NJ, USA). After rehydration in 1 mM MgCl2/physiological saline, GFP expression was observed and photographed using a Zeiss Axiovert 200M microscope and an Axiocam digital camera. A GFP-variant specific filters were utilized; GFP/Texas Red dual filter cube for visualization of green fluorescent protein, and Cyan/Texas red dual cube for blue fluorescent protein as decribed [21]. The filters were obtained from Chroma (Rockingham, VT). The dual bandpass design is required to distinguish the color of the GFP signal from the autofluorescence of the bone and bone marrow.
Immunostaining and Hematoxyillin Eosin (HE) staining
Following detection and imaging of GFP expression, slides were soaked in PBS for 30 min. to remove the coverslides. Sections were blocked with 1%BSA in PBS for 30 min. at room temperature. Sections were stained with Cy3-conjugated mouse monoclonal anti- α-smooth muscle actin (clone 1A, SIGMA, St. Louis, MO, USA) antibody for 1 hr at 1:800 dilution. We utilized monochorome filters to detect transgene driven GFP expression (Col3.6 and Col2.3GFP) in relation to α-SMA immunostaining (FITC filter, excitation 500/20, emission 535/30; TRITC filter, excitation 545/30, emission 620/60). Images were pseudocolored and composite images were generated using Photoshop. The number of single GFP expressing cells (α-SMA+ or Col3.6GFP+) or dual expressing cells were counted. Expression was evaluated in an area that is 2mm distal from growth plate and in proximity to the endocortical surface (selected area was 0.4mm2).
To detect endothelial cells we utilized immunohistochemistry for CD31 (PECAM). Briefly, sections were washed in PBS and then placed in 3% H2O2 for 30 min, followed by a blocking procedure at room temp for 20min. Sections were incubated with rat anti-mouse CD31 primary antibody at 1:100 dilution (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight. Rabbit biotinylated anti-rat secondary antibody (Vector laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) was used at 1:200 dilution. Detection was achieved using a Vectastain ABC kit followed by DAB reaction according to manufacturer instructions (Vector laboratories). After immunostaining sections were washed, mounted with 50% glycerol and imaged. Then HE staining was done to indicate localization of GFP positive cells.
Preparation of primary cell cultures
Bone marrow stromal cell cultures (BMSC)
Four-to 6-week old mice were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation. Femurs and tibiae were dissected from surrounding tissues. The epiphyseal growth plates were removed and the marrow was collected by flushing with αMEM culture medium containing 100 U/ml Penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 10% FCS, Hyclone (serum lot was previously tested for optimal osteogenic differentiation) with a 25 gauge needle. Single cell suspensions were prepared by passing the cell clumps through an 18-gauge needle followed by filtration through a 70-µm strainer and cells were plated at a density 1 × 106 cells/cm2.
Adipose derived stromal cell cultures (ADSC)
Adipose tissue was dissected from inguinal fat pads of 2–3 month old mice. Briefly, after removal, tissue was subjected to sequential 75 min digestions in an enzyme mixture containing Collagenase A (Roche) at a concentration of 0.15%. Cell digestion was resuspended with syringe and 18G needle, filtered using 75µm cell strainer, centrifuged, and resuspended in DMEM containing 10% FCS (serum lot was previously tested for optimal osteogenic differentiation). Cells were plated in 100mm dishes (8–10×106/per plate) in DMEM containing 10% FCS.
Induction of osteogenesis and adipogenesis
Osteogenesis was induced by addition of 10−8M dexamethasone, 50µg/ml ascorbic acid and 8mM β-glycerol phosphate on day 7 of culture and every 2 days for a period of 2 weeks. Adipogenic induction was obtained by adding a cocktail of 0.5µM rosiglitazone and 1µM insulin for a period of 7 days.
Histochemical analysis of cell cultures
Histochemical staining for ALP activity was performed using a commercially available kit (86-R Alkaline Phosphatase, Sigma Diagnostics, Inc. ST. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Mineralization was assessed using a modified von Kossa silver nitrate staining method. Detection of lipid vacuoles was done using an Oil-Red-O (Sigma, USA). Stock solution was prepared as 0.5% in 100% isopropanol, and then fresh diluted to 0.3% before use. Cells were fixed in neutral buffer formalin, and stained for 1 hr. at room temperature. Images were acquired using a flat scanner and processed into a composite image using Adobe Photoshop.
Fluorescent microscopy of cultured cells
GFP expression in cell culture was visualized using an Olympus IX50 inverted system microscope equipped with IX-FLA inverted reflected light fluorescence (Olympus America Inc., Melville, NY). A specific excitation wavelength was obtained using FITC filter (exciter: 470/40; emitter: D525/50) to evaluate the expression of the α-SMAGFP. Cultures derived from dual α-SMAGFP/Col2.3GFPcyan mice were imaged using following filters: (GFP; excitation 500/20, emission 535/30) and (CFP; excitation 436/20, emission 480/40) to separate GFP from CFP. Images were recorded with a SPOT-camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc., Sterling Heights, MI).
Phenotyping of ADSC populations
Preparation of cell suspension
Freshly isolated adipose derived cells derived from α-SMAGFP mice were prepared as described in preparation of ADSC cultures. In addition, cells were washed one time in PBS and filtered into a new tube using a 75µm cell strainer to remove adipose tissue residues. Samples of ADSC derived from α-SMAGFP mice were obtained from 6-day-old culture by digesting the cells with 0.2% collagenase A/0.2% hyalouronidase for 20 min. Cells were centrifuged and washed in PBS. After washing, red blood cells were lysed using ammonium chloride.
Antibodies
The expression of α-SMAGFP was observed in context of the following combinations; a) α-SMAGFP+, anti-mouse CD45R-APC (clone RA3-6B2) and anti-mouse CD11b-PE (clone M1/70); b) α-SMAGFP, anti-mouse CD45R-APC, anti-mouse CD117-PE (clone 2B8); c) α-SMAGFP, anti-mouse CD45R-APC, anti mouse Sca1-PE or d) α-SMAGFP, anti-mouse CD45R-APC and anti mouse CD90-PE. All antibodies reagents were purchased from commercial sources (Pharmingen and eBioscience). Flow cytometry was done on a BD FacsClibur cytometer and data were processed using Cell Quest software.
Cell sorting and transplantation procedure
Cell sorting
Offspring of dual transgenic mice were established by breeding the α-SMAGFP(green) with Col2.3GFPcyan (blue) to have the ability to identify populations of progenitor cells by expressing only SMAA-GFP and to follow their differentiation into osteoblast lineage by activation of Col2.3GFPcyan. ADSC from dual transgenic mice were cultured for 7 days to expand a population of progenitors and then were prepared for cell sorting to selectively purify α-SMAGFP+/Col2.3cyan− populations. The population of interest was sorted by FACS using a BD Vantage SE with FACSDiva option (BD Biosciences). After sorting, purity of the isolated population was assessed.
Preparation of recipient mice
Wild type recipient mice received a lethal dose of 900 cGy total body gamma irradiation (TBI) using a 137Cs source (Nordion Gammacell 40 Irradiator; Atomic Energy of Canada, Ottawa, Canada), with a dose rate of 66.5 cGy/min. Rescue of the hematopoietic system of irradiated mice was performed by systemic infusion of 2.5×106/100µl of donor total bone marrow cells derived from GFP negative (TBMc) into the retro-orbital sinus of anesthetized animals.
Transplantation procedure
Local injection into the medullary space of the tibia or femur was performed in ketamine/xylazine-anesthetized recipient mice. The knee was flexed to 90° and a 26-gauge needle was inserted into the joint surface of the femur or tibia through the patellar tendon and then inserted into the medullary space. The needle was removed and another 26-gauge needle attached to a 1-mL syringe was inserted into the needle tract and extended into the bone marrow space. Donor cells (α-SMAGFP+), 5×105/20µL were slowly injected into the marrow cavity as the needle was being withdrawn from the intramedullary space [26]. Four wild type mice were used to evaluate the osteogenic potential of α-SMAGFP+ cells. To detect new bone formation in relation to the specific donor cell population, mice received a 100µL intraperitoneal injection of freshly prepared xylenol orange (XO; 30 mg/ ml, 90 mg/kg). Images were obtained using FITC/Texas Red and Cyan/Texas red dual cube as previously described [21].
RESULTS
Stimulating expansion of osteoprogenitor cells
We utilized a previously developed transgenic mouse model of osteoblast ablation and recovery to stimulate a defined wave of new bone formation. Specificity of the ablation was achieved by directing the HSV thymidine kinase gene to mature osteoblast lineage cells by using a 2.3kb fragment of type I collagen gene (Col2.3Δtk) [16]. Following 16 days of ganciclovir (GCV) treatment the osteoblast lineage was completely depleted. In this study we assessed the recovery process and examined the origin of cells and their progression toward a mature osteoblast. As shown on figure 1a, (day 0-day 21), the process of osteogenic regeneration is extensive and three weeks into recovery numerous trabeculae are observed extending into diaphyseal bone. Volumetric imaging by X-ray CT (μCT) analysis reveals process of bone regeneration indicating the proximity of the endosteal surface as an area where new centers of bone formation have occurred (figure 1b). At day 12 into recovery an indication of new bone formation was detected as budding of mineralized bone on the endocortical surface (suppl. figure 1). To examine the activation of osteoblast lineage during regeneration we analyzed the gene expression of markers known to be active at certain stages of osteogenic maturation. Following GCV treatment we detected almost a complete disappearance of all markers of mature osteoblast lineage (Col1a1, BSP, OP and OC). During an early phase of recovery (day 7) increases in the expression of Col1a1 and BSP were detected that peaked at day 14, while the expression of osteocalcin was detected at a later stage (day 14) and peaked at day 21. This response is indicative of the process of bone repair and stage-related lineage progression (figure 1c). In addition following ablation of the osteoblast lineage we detected the presence of numerous α-SMA+ cells in the treated bones. In comparison with GCV untreated bone (suppl. figure 2a) in which α-SMA is detected only at the capillary walls, large populations of α-SMA+ cells were present following termination of the treatment and at seven days of recovery (suppl. figure 2b–c). As recovery progressed areas previously abundant with α-SMA+ cells were replaced with matrix-producing osteoblasts (suppl. figure d–e, arrows) and woven bone (suppl. figure 2j–k). After four weeks into the recovery period, expression of α-SMA receded and areas previously populated with α-SMA+ cells were fully replaced with new bone (suppl. figure 2f,l).
Figure 1. Using a transgenic model Col2.3Δtk for expansion of osteoprogenitor cells.
(a) Hematoxyilin eosin staining of sections of femurs derived from Col2.3Δtk transgenic mice (control, no treatment), following osteoblast ablation (day 0, after treatment), and after three weeks of recovery from the treatment (day 21, recovery). (b) microCT images of whole femur and diaphyseal cross-sections at day 0 and 21 days after the termination of GCV treatment, (arrows indicate new bone formation arising from endocortical surface of the bone). (c) Northern blot analysis of osteoblast lineage differentiation associated genes. Untreated, or GCV treated mice were evaluated at time points after the termination of treatment (day of recovery from treatment 0, 7, 14, 21) which corresponds to the age of 8–11 weeks. During this period, rapid growth begins to slow, a process that is represented by decreases in expression of Col1a1, osteocalcin (OC), bone sialoprotein (BSP), and transgene Col2.3Δtk as well. Treatment with GCV completely abolished the expression of bone markers, while during the process of recovery an increase in Col1a1 was observed, followed by an increase in BSP and then OC. This activation of osteoblast lineage markers indicates gradual differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells into mature osteoblasts.
Activation of osteoblast lineage GFP markers during early phase of lineage reactivation
The sequential activation of osteogenesis provides an opportunity to assess the lineage progression utilizing visual markers of osteogenic differentiation. We have previously characterized the expression pattern of pOBCol3.6GFP (Col3.6GFP) as a preosteoblastic marker, while pOBCol2.3GFP (Col2.3GFP) selectively identifies mature osteoblasts and osteocytes [17, 27]. We have generated crosses of Col2.3Δtk transgenic mice with the Col3.6GFP or Col2.3GFP as indicated in figure 2a, and followed the activation of GFP transgenes during the recovery process. Following termination of GCV treatment, osteoblasts on the endocortical surface that were Col3.6GFP+ were completely absent (figure 2b–c, indicated by arrow). Similarly, Col2.3GFP+ osteoblasts were completely ablated by the treatment (figure 2d–e, indicated by arrows). In analysis of early phase of the recovery process we evaluated the appearance of the GFP transgenes at day 7 using paraffin embedded samples. The appearance of the preosteoblastic marker Col3.6GFP was detected within the bone marrow in areas close to the endocortical and trabecular surfaces. Localization of Col3.6GFP cells in vicinity to the blood vessels was also observed (figure 2f–i, arrows). Col2.3GFP expression was restricted to areas on the bone surface associated with more mature osteoblasts (figure 2j–k, arrows).
Figure 2. Use of osteoblast lineage GFP transgenes to trace osteoprogenitor lineage activation.
Upper panel. (a) Breeding procedure required crossing Col2.3Δtk with Col3.6GFP or Col2.3GFP transgenic mice. (b–c) Expression of Col3.6GFP transgene as untreated (b) and after GCV treatment (c); arrows indicate a layer of osteoblasts lining endocortical surface (b) or their complete absence after GCV treatment (c). (d–e) Expression of Col2.3GFP is localized to osteoblasts and osteocytes without treatment (d) or absent in osteoblasts after the treatment, indicated by the arrows (e).
Lower panel. (f–k) GFP expression at 7 days after the termination of treatment. (f–g) Col3.6GFP expression localizes within bone marrow in the proximity to the endocortical surface and in association to the blood vessels (bv, indicated by arrows). (h–i) higher magnification of Col3.6GFP expression. (j–k) Col2.3GFP is detected in pockets lining endocortex, but it was not detected within the bone marrow.
Activation of osteoblast lineage transgenes Col3.6GFP and Col2.3GFP
Validity of the concept that α-SMA+ cells are potential osteoprogenitor cells was evaluated in two dual transgenic mouse models; Col3.6GFP/Col2.3Δtk and Col2.3GFP/Col2.3Δtk by correlating α-SMA expression with preosteoblastic Col3.6GFP or osteoblastic Col2.3GFP activity. Following termination of treatment and into the first week of recovery we detected co-expression of α-SMA immunostaining and Col3.6GFP fluorescence, predominantly localized within the bone marrow space (figure 3a–d, indicated by arrows). A population of 44±13% (n=3) α-SMA+ cells also expressed Col3.6GFP (dual α-SMA/Col3.6GFP). In addition majority of Col3.6GFP+ cells were also α-SMA+ (91±2%). This observation is indicative of commitment towards the early stage of an osteogenic pathway. In contrast, at 7 days after treatment, isolated areas of new matrix deposition and Col2.3GFP signal were observed (figure 3e–h). These areas contain osteoblasts that are negative for α-SMA. Only an occasional cell showed dual expression for Col2.3GFP and α-SMA in the areas of rapid bone formation (data not shown). Collectively, these data indicate that as preosteoblast differentiation progresses into more mature stages of the lineage, SMA expression decreases.
Figure 3. Colocalization of α-SMA with Col3.6GFP transgenes.
During the phase of recovery, activation of Col3.6 and Col2.3GFP was observed. To indicate the activation of Col3.6GFP transgene in cells with the expression of α-SMA we utilized dual transgenic mice (Col2.3tk/Col3.6GFP, a–d) or (Col2.3tk/Col2.3GFP, e–h) in combination with immunostaining for α-SMA and HE staining (d,h). Col3.6GFP activates in the bone marrow (BM) in cells that express Col3.6GFP (a–c; indicated by the arrows). The expression of Col2.3GFP was restricted to the osteocytes inside the cortical bone (CB), and it does not colocalize with the α-SMA expressing cells (e–g, see arrows). Bar = 200µm.
Evaluation of SMAA directed transgene expression
We have acquired transgenic mice in which a 1.1 kb of α-SMA promoter drives a GFP transgene [19, 20, 28]. A detailed analysis of α-SMAGFP expression was completed in osseous (supplementary figure 3) and non-osseous tissues (supplementary figure 4) in relation to the endogenous α-SMA expression. Expression was observed in cells associated with blood vessels and capillaries and in the myofibroblastic cells located in areas containing osteoprogenitor cells such as cranial sutures and periosteum. A close correlation in expression of α-SMAGFP with endogenous α-SMA expression was observed in all tested tissues. At six weeks of age, few α-SMAGFP+ cells are detected in the periosteum of long bone in association with blood vessels (supplementary figure 5).
In vitro analysis of differentiation potential of α-SMAGFP+ cells
The differentiation potential of α-SMAGFP+ cells was evaluated using primary tissue culture system. Bone marrow stromal cell cultures and adipose derived stromal cell were prepared from α-SMAGFP transgenic mice. Following expansion and separation of cell populations by FACS with purity >99%, cells were induced to osteogenesis and adipogenesis (figure 4a). Sorted α-SMAGFP+ cells continued to proliferate and differentiate into osteogenic and adipogenic lineages with strong expression of ALP, mineralization or lipid vacuoles. The α-SMAGFP− population remained ALP negative, with no detectable mineralization (figure 4a–b). α-SMAGFP+ cells derived from adipose tissue reached confluence and showed evidence of osteogenic differentiation (figure 4c–d). A large proportion of α-SMAGFP− population was CD31+, indicating the presence of endothelial cells (data not shown).
Figure 4. In vitro analysis of differentiation potential of α-SMA-GFP+ cells.
(a) primary bone marrow stromal cells cultured for 7 days before FACS sorting (unsorted), and α-SMA-GFP+ and GFP− population after sorting and replating. Flow cytometry diagrams show reanalysis of purity of populations. From 50% of α-SMAGFP+ cells, highly pure populations of α-SMAGFP+ and GFP− cells were isolated. (b) Following separation, cells were replated and placed under osteogenic or adipogenic inductive conditions. Cultures were stained for alkaline phosphatase, and for mineralization by the von Kossa silver nitrate method to detect osteogenesis, and by oil-red-0 staining for presence of lipid vacuoles. Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation was present in α-SMAGFP+ cells while α-SMAGFP− cells did not progress towards differentiated phenotypes. (c) The same populations were separated from primary adipose derived stromal cells cultures. (d) Similar to BMSC adipose derived stromal α-SMAGFP+ cells exhibited the ability to differentiate into osteoblasts (ALP+ and mineralized nodules) and adipocytes (oil red).
Defining the α-SMAGFP+ population derived from adipose tissue
The ability of the α-SMAGFP+ population derived from adipose tissue to generate osteoblasts in vitro directed us to more clearly define the in vivo origin of these cells and their characteristics. To localize the α-SMAGFP+ cells, inguinal fat pads were frozen-embedded and cryosectioned. Immunostaining for endothelial marker CD31 indicated a close proximity of α-SMAGFP+ cells to the endothelial cells associated with the microvasculature in the adipose tissues (figure 5a). No GFP signal and no CD31 staining were detected in adipocytes. Collagenase digested adipose tissue yielded between 1–3% of cells expressing α-SMAGFP marker, of which a high proportion (>50%) were Sca1+ and Thy1+ (data not shown). In vitro expanded populations of GFP positive cells were analyzed at an early stage of the primary culture. To obtain a better definition of α-SMAGFP+ cells, flow cytometry analysis of 6-day old cultures was done. Detection of GFP transgene was combined with immunolabeling for CD45, Sca-1, CD90, CD117, and CD11b. The α-SMAGFP+ cells accounted for 79±6% of the cell culture (figure 5b), were CD45− and did not express CD117 or CD11b (GFP+/CD45−/CD117−/CD11b−). Large proportions of α-SMAGFP+ cells were Sca1+ and Thy1+, indicative of a presence of the mesenchymal progenitor population within the α-SMAGFP+ cells (figure 5c). Following evidence that adipose-derived α-SMAGFP+ cells have the ability to differentiate into osteoblast lineage in vitro, our goal was to utilize the promoter-GFP transgenic approach that would confirm these observations using an in vivo transplantation model. Dual GFP transgenic mice harboring α-SMAGFP(green) expression and bone-specific Col2.3CFP(blue) directed expression were utilized in this analysis. Seven day old primary adipose stromal cell culture expressing α-SMAGFP(green) was separated from both GFP− and dual GFP expressing cells. A high degree of purity of isolated α-SMAGFP+ cells (>99%) was obtained by FACS and in vitro evaluation of GFP expression. (figure 6a–c). Cells were placed in culture to recover from the sorting procedure, and after 48 hours α-SMAGFP+ cells were transplanted into the bone marrow cavity of irradiated wild type mice. We find this recovery period necessary, as a high proportion of cells can be damaged during the sorting procedure and this can subsequently affect osteogenic ability after in vivo transplantation. Following transplantation of α-SMAGFP+ cells, new bone formation was detected after 4 weeks as indicated by freshly deposited xylenol orange (red) labele that was injected 24 hours prior to sacrificing the animals. We can clearly identify a Col2.3CFP (blue) positive cell population lining the newly formed bone matrix (figure 6d–e). Although adipose tissue has already been utilized as a valuable source of osteoprogenitor cells, these results provide a more clearly delineated definition of the pericyte/myofibroblasts within adipose tissue as a population of cells capable of differentiating into functional osteoblasts.
Figure 5. Phenotype of α-SMAGFP+ cells residing in adipose tissue.
(a) Localization of α-SMAGFP+ cells (left panel) in relation to the CD31+ cells (immunohostochemistry, middle panel) and composite image (right panel) indicates close proximity of α-SMAGFP+ cells to the endothelial cells. (b) Epifluorescence and brightfield images of 7 day old primary cultures derived from adipose tissue indicates high proportions of cells expressing GFP. (c) Flow cytometry analysis of α-SMAGFP+ cells derived from adipose tissue cultures. An average of 79±6% of cells are α-SMAGFP+ (non-GFP expressing cells were used as negative control). Profiling of adipose derived cells was done using antibodies for CD45, Sca-1, CD90, CD117 and CD11b. α-SMAGFP+ cells were CD45−, CD117− and CD11b− and positive for Sca-1+ (75±12%), CD90+ (59±13%). Representative plots derived from seven individual cultures are shown.
Figure 6. In vivo analysis of osteogenic differentiation of adipose derived α-SMAGFP+ cells.
(a–c) Isolation of α-SMAGFP+ cells from adipose derived stromal cells cultures from dual transgenic mice (α-SMAGFPgreen/Col2.3GFPcyan); (a) analysis prior to cell separation, (b) reanalysis of α-SMAGFP− and (c) α-SMAGFP+ population for post sorting purity. (d–e) Histological sections derived from bones transplanted with sorted α-SMAGFP+ cells. Weak expression of α-SMAGFP (green) was observed in fibroblastic cells (d) while a strong GFPcyan (blue) was detected in newly formed bone (e, see arrows) localized along the deposition of xylenol orange (red color). As sorted cells were only α-SMAGFP+, this provides supporting evidence that this population of cells contains cells with osteogenic potential. Bar = 100µm.
DISCUSSION
During the last decade the term adult-derived stem cells has become very popular in regenerative biology. Cells with various differentiation properties can be obtained from a variety of tissue sources including bone marrow [29], dental pulp [30], muscle [31], adipose tissue [32], tendon [33, 34] and hair follicles [35]. Furthermore, it has been shown that cells residing within subcutaneous tissue or muscle can differentiate into mature osteoblasts following implantation of BMP in collagen gels or in blood clot as a carrier [36, 37]. It is intriguing that there is a wide tissue distribution of cells with mesenchymal progenitor properties, indicative of a common progenitor population residing in these tissues. These adult tissue-derived mesenchymal progenitors exhibit morphology, immunophenotype, and growth properties similar to bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells [38]. A perivascular niche has been implicated as a source of the mesenchymal progenitor by a number of laboratories [30, 39, 40]. Studies have shown that when placed in vitro, retinal pericytes can generate mineralizing nodules [41], chondrocytes and adipocytes [42].
In this study we have defined a population of α-SMA expressing cells as osteogenic precursor cells. The α-SMA cells were localized to a perivascular niche, periosteum, and suture; areas reported to contain osteoprogenitor cells. The α-SMAGFP+ cells derived from primary bone marrow stromal and adipose-derived stromal cells exhibit both osteogenic and adipogenic potential in vitro. However, the expression of α-SMA is not specific to pericytes; it is also present in vascular smooth muscle cells of larger blood vessels. This finding increases the complexity in studying this population of cells, and indicates the importance of the generation of new markers that would be pericyte restricted. A potentially successful approach would require generation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against isolated α-SMAGFP+ cells. This could lead to the identification of cell surface markers that, in combination with known markers, would permit better identification and characterization of the pericytes.
The results of our study indicate that the expansion of α-SMA positive cells within the bone marrow itself is detected following ablation of the osteoblast lineage. Localization of the α-SMA+ cells is first observed in proximity to the endocortical and trabecular surfaces, areas of bone that are rich in capillary network [43, 44]. The activation of Col3.6GFP transgene in a portion of the α-SMA+ cells was observed by dual fluorescent imaging. Supporting in vitro data obtained from marrow stromal cells of dual transgenic mice expressing α-SMA and Col3.6GFP revealed that activation of Col3.6GFP in α-SMA is an indicator of preosteoblastic differentiation [45]. In addition a microarray study obtained from primary calvarial osteoblast cultures indicated that the transition from Col3.6GFP− to Col3.6GFP+ population is characterized by a decrease in expression of a number of genes associated with the myofibroblastic phenotype [27, 45]. Furthermore, we can occasionally detect a rare population of dual expressing α-SMAGFP+/Col2.3GFP+ cells as a transitional stage to mature osteoblasts. This finding is observed in primary bone marrow stromal cell cultures and may be explained by the long half life of GFP that allows for the detection of Col2.3GFP while the α-SMAGFP signal becomes weaker (data not shown).
Collectively, our study indicates that expanded α-SMA+ cells can actively participate in new bone formation following an induced injury to the osteoblast lineage. Other studies have reported that α-SMA+ myofibroblasts can participate in fibrotic changes of various tissues following different kind of injuries [46]. Myofibroblasts responsible for lung fibrosis are potentially derived from perivascular cells [46, 47] and fibrotic changes in liver as a wound healing response to various injuries are also based on myofibroblastic response [48]. Similarities of these populations exist in localization to the perivascular region and expression of the α-SMA gene (supplementary figure 3–5) [49]. The physiological relevance of α-SMA+ cells as osteoprogenitors must be further studied. A Col2.3Δtk model represents a specific injury to the lineage, and a response of α-SMA+ cells in the form of osteogenic differentiation could be a characteristic of this specific tissue damage. The use of dual transgenic mice will allow the separation of cells at a point of activation of the preosteoblastic Col3.6GFP transgene, enabling analysis of the regulation of osteogenic gene profiles toward elucidation of the pathways regulating the mechanism of osteoprogenitor induction. A recent publication by Sacchetti et al. defined a cell population of osteoprogenitors as MCAM/CD146+ subendothelial cells in human bone marrow stroma [13, 50]. The approach utilized in their study adds validity to observations that perivascular cells exhibit the osteoprogenitor ability supportive of hematopoiesis [13].
Tissues other than bone marrow contain perivascular progenitor cells. From a tissue regeneration standpoint, adipose tissue represents an attractive, easily accessible, and abundant source of pericytes.
Recent study by Zannettino et al. presented data describing a presence of multipotential cell population within adult human adipose tissue, which appeas to be intimately associated with perivascular cells [51]. We have characterized a population of α-SMAGFP+ cells residing in adipose tissue by cell surface markers currently used as characteristic epitopes of mesenchymal progenitor cells. A high proportion of α-SMAGFP+ cells isolated from freshly digested adipose tissue were positive for the stem cell markers [52–54], stem cell antigen 1 (SCA-1+) and CD90+, while they did not express CD117 (c-kit) or CD11b (Mac1) (data not shown). Following a brief culturing period, population of α-SMAGFP+/Sca1+ and α-SMAGFP+/CD90+ cells were expanded and represented 75±12% and 59±13% of cells respectively. To substantiate our observation that the α-SMAGFP+ cells are osteoprogenitors, we completed an in vivo study that showed evidence that adipose derived α-SMAGFP+ cells were able to differentiate into functional osteoblasts. This finding is consistent with previously published reports in which the osteogenic potential of unseparated adipose derived stromal cells was detected [32, 55]. Our study defined the pericyte as a population of cells that resides in adipose tissue in close proximity to endothelial cells and exhibits in vitro and in vivo ability to generate osteoprogenitor lineage. These characteristics, indicate that adipose tissue derived α-SMAGFP cells have the potential to be utilized for bone tissue regeneration. Future studies will determine if the population of myofibroblast/pericytes is responsible for the ectopic calcification occurring in tendon and muscle in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva[56] or for the other forms of tissue calcifications [57–59].
Supplementary Material
Supplementary figure 1. Time course of bone regeneration following GCV treatment. From day 12 to day 17 trabecular bone begins to extend towards the diaphysis and outgrowths arising from the endocortical surface can be observed (indicated by arrows). By day 21, bone marrow becomes completely filled with new trabecular bone.
Supplementary figure 2. Detection of α-SMA using immunostaining (a–f) during process of bone recovery from GCV treatment, and hematoxylin staining to indicate bone tissue (g–l). α-SMA expression is restricted to cells associated with capillaries in untreated bones. Following treatment (b,h, day 0 of recovery) α-SMAGFP cells were detected in bone marrow in proximity to the endocortical surface, while at day 7 they were distributed throughout the bone marrow (c,i). Evidence of new bone formation concomitant with the disappearance of the α-SMA expression occurred between day 12 (d,j) and day 17 (e,k; areas of new bone are indicated by the arrows). After the recovery phase was completed by day 27 (f,l) bone marrow was filled with newly formed trabecular bone.
Supplementary figure 3. Colocalization of αSMAGFP(green) with endogenous αSMA expression in calcified tissues (Cy3 conjugated antibody, red). Images were taken utilizing monochrome camera and appropriate filters for GFP (excitation 500/20, emission 535/30) and red (excitation 545/30, emission 620/60), and images were then pseudocolored and overlayed as a composite image. HE staining of the same section was completed to indicate tissue localization. In 5-day and 5-week old sutures, αSMAGFP is active in periosteum and in cells associated with capillaries (see arrows). Osteoblast lining the bone marrow spaces were negative for GFP (arrowhead). Dura mater was the only source of tissue in which we have detected αSMAGFP without the signal from endogenous αSMA. In long bones, the expression of transgene and αSMA gene was restricted to microvessels within cortical bone and to the periosteal layer.
Supplementary figure 4. Colocalization of αSMAGFP with endogenous αSMA expression in soft tissues. Images were taken utilizing monochrome camera and then pseudocolored and overlayed as a composite image. HE staining of the same section was completed to indicate tissue localization (note, HE image of adipose tissue presents adjacent section). In adipose tissue, muscle, lung and liver αSMAGFP and endogenous αSMA expression was localized to blood vessels and to capillary network (see arrows).
Supplementary figure 5. Localizing αSMAGFP to perivascular area. Images were taken epifluorescnece (left panel) and brightfield for immunohistochemical staining (right panel). GFP expression was localized on the outer layer blood vessels or capillaries lined with CD31 endothelial cells (see arrows).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Dr. Sanai Sato and Dr. Jen-Yue Tsai for providing us with the α-SMAGFP transgenic mice.
Supported by: This work has been supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01-AR043457) to DWR, and (R03-AR053275) to IK.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
- 1.Grigoriadis AE, Heersche JN, Aubin JE. Differentiation of muscle, fat, cartilage, and bone from progenitor cells present in a bone-derived clonal cell population: effect of dexamethasone. J Cell Biol. l1988;106:2139–2151. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.6.2139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. l1999;284:143–147. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dacic S, Kalajzic I, Visnjic D, Lichtler AC, Rowe DW. Col1a1-driven transgenic markers of osteoblast lineage progression. J Bone Miner Res. l2001;16:1228–1236. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.7.1228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Simmons PJ, Torok-Storb B. Identification of stromal cell precursors in human bone marrow by a novel monoclonal antibody, STRO-1. Blood. l1991;78:55–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dennis JE, Carbillet JP, Caplan AI, Charbord P. The STRO-1+ marrow cell population is multipotential. Cells Tissues Organs. l2002;170:73–82. doi: 10.1159/000046182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gronthos S, Zannettino AC, Graves SE, Ohta S, Hay SJ, Simmons PJ. Differential cell surface expression of the STRO-1 and alkaline phosphatase antigens on discrete developmental stages in primary cultures of human bone cells. J Bone Miner Res. l1999;14:47–56. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bruder SP, Horowitz MC, Mosca JD, Haynesworth SE. Monoclonal antibodies reactive with human osteogenic cell surface antigens. Bone. l1997;21:225–235. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00127-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bruder SP, Ricalton NS, Boynton RE, Connolly TJ, Jaiswal N, Zaia J, Barry FP. Mesenchymal stem cell surface antigen SB-10 corresponds to activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule and is involved in osteogenic differentiation. J Bone Miner Res. l1998;13:655–663. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.4.655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zannettino AC, Harrison K, Joyner CJ, Triffitt JT, Simmons PJ. Molecular cloning of the cell surface antigen identified by the osteoprogenitor-specific monoclonal antibody, HOP-26. J Cell Biochem. l2003;89:56–66. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Joyner CJ, Bennett A, Triffitt JT. Identification and enrichment of human osteoprogenitor cells by using differentiation stage-specific monoclonal antibodies. Bone. l1997;21:1–6. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00074-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Deschaseaux F, Charbord P. Human marrow stromal precursors are alpha 1 integrin subunit-positive. J Cell Physiol. l2000;184:319–325. doi: 10.1002/1097-4652(200009)184:3<319::AID-JCP5>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stewart K, Monk P, Walsh S, Jefferiss CM, Letchford J, Beresford JN. STRO-1, HOP-26 (CD63), CD49a and SB-10 (CD166) as markers of primitive human marrow stromal cells and their more differentiated progeny: a comparative investigation in vitro. Cell Tissue Res. l2003;313:281–290. doi: 10.1007/s00441-003-0762-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sacchetti B, Funari A, Michienzi S, Di Cesare S, Piersanti S, Saggio I, Tagliafico E, Ferrari S, Robey PG, Riminucci M, Bianco P. Self-renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment. Cell. l2007;131:324–336. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bowen MA, Bajorath J, D'Egidio M, Whitney GS, Palmer D, Kobarg J, Starling GC, Siadak AW, Aruffo A. Characterization of mouse ALCAM (CD166): the CD6-binding domain is conserved in different homologs and mediates cross-species binding. Eur J Immunol. l1997;27:1469–1478. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830270625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bonyadi M, Waldman SD, Liu D, Aubin JE, Grynpas MD, Stanford WL. Mesenchymal progenitor self-renewal deficiency leads to age-dependent osteoporosis in Sca-1/Ly-6A null mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. l2003;100:5840–5845. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1036475100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Visnjic D, Kalajzic I, Gronowicz G, Aguila HL, Clark SH, Lichtler AC, Rowe DW. Conditional ablation of the osteoblast lineage in Col2.3deltatk transgenic mice. J Bone Miner Res. l2001;16:2222–2231. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.12.2222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kalajzic I, Kalajzic Z, Kaliterna M, Gronowicz G, Clark SH, Lichtler AC, Rowe D. Use of type I collagen green fluorescent protein transgenes to identify subpopulations of cells at different stages of the osteoblast lineage. J Bone Miner Res. l2002;17:15–25. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bilic-Curcic I, Kronenberg M, Jiang X, Bellizzi J, Mina M, Marijanovic I, Gardiner EM, Rowe DW. Visualizing levels of osteoblast differentiation by a two-color promoter-GFP strategy: Type I collagen-GFPcyan and osteocalcin-GFPtpz. Genesis. l2005;43:87–98. doi: 10.1002/gene.20156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Maeda S, Sutliff RL, Qian J, Lorenz JN, Wang J, Tang H, Nakayama T, Weber C, Witte D, Strauch AR, Paul RJ, Fagin JA, Clemens TL. Targeted overexpression of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) to vascular smooth muscle in transgenic mice lowers blood pressure and alters vascular contractility. Endocrinology. l1999;140:1815–1825. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.4.6646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yokota T, Kawakami Y, Nagai Y, Ma JX, Tsai JY, Kincade PW, Sato S. Bone marrow lacks a transplantable progenitor for smooth muscle type alpha-actin-expressing cells. Stem Cells. l2006;24:13–22. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jiang X, Kalajzic Z, Maye P, Braut A, Bellizzi J, Mina M, Rowe DW. Histological analysis of GFP expression in murine bone. J Histochem Cytochem. l2005;53:593–602. doi: 10.1369/jhc.4A6401.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Genovese C, Rowe D, Kream B. Construction of DNA sequences complementary to rat alpha 1 and alpha 2 collagen mRNA and their use in studying the regulation of type I collagen synthesis by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Biochemistry. l1984;23:6210–6216. doi: 10.1021/bi00320a049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Celeste AJ, Rosen V, Buecker JL, Kriz R, Wang EA, Wozney JM. Isolation of the human gene for bone gla protein utilizing mouse and rat cDNA clones. Embo J. l1986;5:1885–1890. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04440.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Young MF, Ibaraki K, Kerr JM, Lyu MS, Kozak CA. Murine bone sialoprotein (BSP): cDNA cloning, mRNA expression, and genetic mapping. Mamm Genome. l1994;5:108–111. doi: 10.1007/BF00292337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning : a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang L, Liu Y, Kalajzic Z, Jiang X, Rowe DW. Heterogeneity of engrafted bone-lining cells after systemic and local transplantation. Blood. l2005;106:3650–3657. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kalajzic I, Staal A, Yang WP, Wu Y, Johnson SE, Feyen JH, Krueger W, Maye P, Yu F, Zhao Y, Kuo L, Gupta RR, Achenie LE, Wang HW, Shin DG, Rowe DW. Expression profile of osteoblast lineage at defined stages of differentiation. J Biol Chem. l2005;280:24618–24626. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413834200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang J, Niu W, Nikiforov Y, Naito S, Chernausek S, Witte D, LeRoith D, Strauch A, Fagin JA. Targeted overexpression of IGF-I evokes distinct patterns of organ remodeling in smooth muscle cell tissue beds of transgenic mice. J Clin Invest. l1997;100:1425–1439. doi: 10.1172/JCI119663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Krause DS, Theise ND, Collector MI, Henegariu O, Hwang S, Gardner R, Neutzel S, Sharkis SJ. Multi-organ, multi-lineage engraftment by a single bone marrow-derived stem cell. Cell. l2001;105:369–377. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00328-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shi S, Gronthos S. Perivascular niche of postnatal mesenchymal stem cells in human bone marrow and dental pulp. J Bone Miner Res. l2003;18:696–704. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.4.696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bosch P, Musgrave DS, Lee JY, Cummins J, Shuler T, Ghivizzani TC, Evans T, Robbins TD, Huard Osteoprogenitor cells within skeletal muscle. J Orthop Res. l2000;18:933–944. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100180613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ogawa R, Mizuno H, Watanabe A, Migita M, Shimada T, Hyakusoku H. Osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation by adipose-derived stem cells harvested from GFP transgenic mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. l2004;313:871–877. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bi Y, Ehirchiou D, Kilts TM, Inkson CA, Embree MC, Sonoyama W, Li L, Leet AI, Seo BM, Zhang L, Shi S, Young MF. Identification of tendon stem/progenitor cells and the role of the extracellular matrix in their niche. Nat Med. l2007;13:1219–1227. doi: 10.1038/nm1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Salingcarnboriboon R, Yoshitake H, Tsuji K, Obinata M, Amagasa T, Nifuji A, Noda M. Establishment of tendon-derived cell lines exhibiting pluripotent mesenchymal stem cell-like property. Exp Cell Res. l2003;287:289–300. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4827(03)00107-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jahoda CA, Whitehouse J, Reynolds AJ, Hole N. Hair follicle dermal cells differentiate into adipogenic and osteogenic lineages. Exp Dermatol. l2003;12:849–859. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-6705.2003.00161.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Marusic A, Grcevic D, Katavic V, Kovacic N, Lukic IK, Kalajzic I, Lorenzo JA. Role of B lymphocytes in new bone formation. Lab Invest. l2000;80:1761–1774. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stoeger T, Proetzel GE, Welzel H, Papadimitriou A, Dony C, Balling R, Hofmann C. In situ gene expression analysis during BMP2-induced ectopic bone formation in mice shows simultaneous endochondral and intramembranous ossification. Growth Factors. l2002;20:197–210. doi: 10.1080/0897719021000069579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.da Silva Meirelles L, Chagastelles PC, Nardi NB. Mesenchymal stem cells reside in virtually all post-natal organs and tissues. J Cell Sci. l2006;119:2204–2213. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bianco P, Riminucci M, Gronthos S, Robey PG. Bone marrow stromal stem cells: nature, biology, and potential applications. Stem Cells. l2001;19:180–192. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.19-3-180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gronthos S, Zannettino AC, Hay SJ, Shi S, Graves SE, Kortesidis A, Simmons PJ. Molecular and cellular characterisation of highly purified stromal stem cells derived from human bone marrow. J Cell Sci. l2003;116:1827–1835. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Doherty MJ, Ashton BA, Walsh S, Beresford JN, Grant ME, Canfield AE. Vascular pericytes express osteogenic potential in vitro and in vivo. J Bone Miner Res. l1998;13:828–838. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.5.828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Farrington-Rock C, Crofts NJ, Doherty MJ, Ashton BA, Griffin-Jones C, Canfield AE. Chondrogenic and adipogenic potential of microvascular pericytes. Circulation. l2004;110:2226–2232. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000144457.55518.E5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fei J, Peyrin F, Malaval L, Vico L, Lafage-Proust M. Bone Vascularisation Imaging: Comparison of Histology, Conventional and Synchrotron Radiation Micro Computerised Tomography in the Adult Rat Long Bones. J Bone Miner Res. l2006;21:SU096. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Short B, Brouard N, Occhiodoro-Scott T, Ramakrishnan A, Simmons PJ. Mesenchymal stem cells. Arch Med Res. l2003;34:565–571. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2003.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kalajzic I, Kalajzic Z, Wang L, Jiang X, Lamothe K, San Miguel SM, Aguila HL, Rowe DW. Pericyte/myofibroblast phenotype of osteoprogenitor cell. Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions. l2007 In Press. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hinz B, Phan SH, Thannickal VJ, Galli A, Bochaton-Piallat ML, Gabbiani G. The Myofibroblast. One Function, Multiple Origins. Am J Pathol. l2007 doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhang K, Rekhter MD, Gordon D, Phan SH. Myofibroblasts and their role in lung collagen gene expression during pulmonary fibrosis. A combined immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization study. Am J Pathol. l1994;145:114–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Guyot C, Lepreux S, Combe C, Doudnikoff E, Bioulac-Sage P, Balabaud C. Desmouliere A. Hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis: the (myo)fibroblastic cell subpopulations involved. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. l2006;38:135–151. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2005.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Carpino G, Morini S, Ginanni Corradini S, Franchitto A, Merli M, Siciliano M, Gentili F, Onetti Muda A, Berloco P, Rossi M, Attili AF, Gaudio E. Alpha-SMA expression in hepatic stellate cells and quantitative analysis of hepatic fibrosis in cirrhosis and in recurrent chronic hepatitis after liver transplantation. Dig Liver Dis. l2005;37:349–356. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2004.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shih IM. The role of CD146 (Mel-CAM) in biology and pathology. J Pathol. l1999;189:4–11. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<4::AID-PATH332>3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zannettino AC, Paton S, Arthur A, Khor F, Itescu S, Gimble JM, Gronthos S. Multipotential human adipose-derived stromal stem cells exhibit a perivascular phenotype in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Physiol. l2008;214:413–421. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Spangrude GJ, Heimfeld S, Weissman IL. Purification and characterization of mouse hematopoietic stem cells. Science. l1988;241:58–62. doi: 10.1126/science.2898810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Van Vlasselaer P, Falla N, Snoeck H, Mathieu E. Characterization and purification of osteogenic cells from murine bone marrow by two-color cell sorting using anti-Sca-1 monoclonal antibody and wheat germ agglutinin. Blood. l1994;84:753–763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Welm BE, Tepera SB, Venezia T, Graubert TA, Rosen JM, Goodell MA. Sca-1(pos) cells in the mouse mammary gland represent an enriched progenitor cell population. Dev Biol. l2002;245:42–56. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cowan CM, Shi YY, Aalami OO, Chou YF, Mari C, Thomas R, Quarto N, Contag CH, Wu B, Longaker MT. Adipose-derived adult stromal cells heal critical-size mouse calvarial defects. Nat Biotechnol. l2004;22:560–567. doi: 10.1038/nbt958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Connor JM, Evans DA. Extra-articular ankylosis in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Br J Oral Surg. l1982;20:117–121. doi: 10.1016/0007-117x(82)90018-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mody N, Tintut Y, Radcliff K, Demer LL. Vascular calcification and its relation to bone calcification: possible underlying mechanisms. J Nucl Cardiol. l2003;10:177–183. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2003.0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Abedin M, Tintut Y, Demer LL. Mesenchymal stem cells and the artery wall. Circ Res. l2004;95:671–676. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000143421.27684.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Towler DA, Bidder M, Latifi T, Coleman T, Semenkovich CF. Diet-induced diabetes activates an osteogenic gene regulatory program in the aortas of low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. l1998;273:30427–30434. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.46.30427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary figure 1. Time course of bone regeneration following GCV treatment. From day 12 to day 17 trabecular bone begins to extend towards the diaphysis and outgrowths arising from the endocortical surface can be observed (indicated by arrows). By day 21, bone marrow becomes completely filled with new trabecular bone.
Supplementary figure 2. Detection of α-SMA using immunostaining (a–f) during process of bone recovery from GCV treatment, and hematoxylin staining to indicate bone tissue (g–l). α-SMA expression is restricted to cells associated with capillaries in untreated bones. Following treatment (b,h, day 0 of recovery) α-SMAGFP cells were detected in bone marrow in proximity to the endocortical surface, while at day 7 they were distributed throughout the bone marrow (c,i). Evidence of new bone formation concomitant with the disappearance of the α-SMA expression occurred between day 12 (d,j) and day 17 (e,k; areas of new bone are indicated by the arrows). After the recovery phase was completed by day 27 (f,l) bone marrow was filled with newly formed trabecular bone.
Supplementary figure 3. Colocalization of αSMAGFP(green) with endogenous αSMA expression in calcified tissues (Cy3 conjugated antibody, red). Images were taken utilizing monochrome camera and appropriate filters for GFP (excitation 500/20, emission 535/30) and red (excitation 545/30, emission 620/60), and images were then pseudocolored and overlayed as a composite image. HE staining of the same section was completed to indicate tissue localization. In 5-day and 5-week old sutures, αSMAGFP is active in periosteum and in cells associated with capillaries (see arrows). Osteoblast lining the bone marrow spaces were negative for GFP (arrowhead). Dura mater was the only source of tissue in which we have detected αSMAGFP without the signal from endogenous αSMA. In long bones, the expression of transgene and αSMA gene was restricted to microvessels within cortical bone and to the periosteal layer.
Supplementary figure 4. Colocalization of αSMAGFP with endogenous αSMA expression in soft tissues. Images were taken utilizing monochrome camera and then pseudocolored and overlayed as a composite image. HE staining of the same section was completed to indicate tissue localization (note, HE image of adipose tissue presents adjacent section). In adipose tissue, muscle, lung and liver αSMAGFP and endogenous αSMA expression was localized to blood vessels and to capillary network (see arrows).
Supplementary figure 5. Localizing αSMAGFP to perivascular area. Images were taken epifluorescnece (left panel) and brightfield for immunohistochemical staining (right panel). GFP expression was localized on the outer layer blood vessels or capillaries lined with CD31 endothelial cells (see arrows).






