Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Aug;76(4):556–567. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.4.556

Table 2.

Separate and Combined RRMs Evaluating Predictors of Cognitive Behavioral and Monitoring Adherence to Contingency Management

Cognitive Behavioral Adherencea Monitoring Adherenceb
Separate RRMsc RRM with All Predictors Separate RRMsc RRM with All Predictors
Parameter Coeff. Coeff. SE Coefficient 95% CI Coeff. Coeff. SE Coefficient 95% CI
Note. The T ratio test statistic for each parameter (omitted) was computed as Coefficient / SE. Unless otherwise noted, the DFs for the significance tests for the π, β, and γ coefficients were 33, 110, and 33, respectively.
Intercept (π0) 2.14*** 1.96*** 0.25 1.47 to 2.45 1.02*** 1.13*** 0.15 0.84 to 1.42
Practitioner demographics, professional experience, & service sector
Age (β01) −0.01 −0.02* 0.01 −0.04 to 0.00 −0.01 −0.01* 0.01 −0.03 to 0.01
Gender (0 = male, β02) 0.01 −0.21 0.16 −0.52 to 0.10 −0.17 −0.33** 0.10 −0.53 to−0.13
Minority (caucasian = 0, β03) −0.07 0.07 0.15 −0.22 to 0.36 −0.06 −0.05 0.09 −0.23 to 0.13
Degree type (0 = bachelor or less, β04) −0.06 0.05 0.18 −0.30 to 0.40 −0.02 0.08 0.11 −0.14 to 0.30
Addiction certification (0 = no, β05) 0.25 0.51** 0.18 0.16 to 0.86 0.18* 0.29** 0.11 0.07 to 0.51
Discipline: education (0 = no, β06) 0.16 0.29 0.19 −0.08 to 0.66 −0.03 0.12 0.11 −0.10 to 0.34
Discipline: psychology (0 = no, β07) 0.09 0.11 0.21 −0.30 to 0.52 0.06 −0.02 0.13 −0.27 to 0.23
Discipline: social work (0 = no, β08) 0.02 0.17 0.14 −0.10 to 0.44 0.14 0.25** 0.08 0.09 to 0.41
Years in the field of counseling (β09) 0.01 0.01 0.01 −0.01 to 0.03 −0.01 −0.01 0.01 −0.03 to 0.01
Years present job (β010) 0.01 −0.01 0.02 −0.04 to 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 −0.01 to 0.03
Caseload size (β011) 0.11* 0.12** 0.04 0.04 to 0.20 −0.01 −0.02 0.03 −0.08 to 0.04
Proportion youth clients (β012) 0.01 0.12* 0.06 0.00 to 0.24 −0.05 −0.02 0.03 −0.08 to 0.04
Proportion youth sub abuse clients (β013) 0.06 −0.04 0.06 −0.16 to 0.08 0.07* 0.02 0.04 −0.06 to 0.10
Service sector (0 = mental health, γ001) 0.21 −0.01 0.26 −0.52 to 0.50 0.21* −0.18 0.16 −0.49 to 0.13
Practitioner attitudes
Negative process (β014) −0.18 −0.23* 0.11 −0.45 to−0.01 −0.10 −0.11 0.07 −0.25 to 0.03
Positive outcomes (β015) 0.12 0.16 0.15 −0.13 to 0.45 0.01 −0.05 0.09 −0.23 to 0.13
Requirements (β016) −0.07 0.06 0.07 −0.08 to 0.20 0.34 0.05 0.04 −0.03 to 0.13
Appeal (β017) −0.14 −0.19 0.12 −0.43 to 0.05 0.03 −0.01 0.07 −0.15 to 0.13
Openness (β018) 0.10 0.07 0.11 −0.15 to 0.29 0.04 0.05 0.07 −0.09 to 0.19
Divergence (β019) −0.05 0.02 0.09 −0.16 to 0.20 −0.06 −0.02 0.05 −0.12 to 0.08
Cognitive behavior therapyd (β01) 0.02 −0.01
Behavior therapyd (β01) 0.11 −0.01
Family therapyd (β01) 0.09 −0.01
Organizational characteristics
Motivation for change (γ002) 0.54 0.70* 0.31 0.09 to 1.31 0.19 0.25 0.19 −0.12 to 0.62
Resources (γ003) 0.32 0.43 0.32 −0.20 to 1.06 0.27* 0.10 0.19 −0.27 to 0.47
Staff attributes (γ004) 0.33 −1.32 0.75 −2.79 to 0.15 0.50 −0.40 0.44 −1.26 to 0.46
Organizational climate (γ005) 0.23 0.47 0.47 −0.45 to 1.39 0.21 0.16 0.28 −0.39 to 0.71
Training (γ006) 0.42 0.40 0.35 −0.29 to 1.09 0.45* 0.43* 0.21 0.02 to 0.84
a

Range = 0-3.

b

Range = 0-2.

c

This column provides the unstandardized regression coefficient for each predictor with no other predictors in the RRM.

d

Due to a non-trivial proportion of missing data on this predictor (i.e., “No Opinion” responses), it was evaluated in the separate model only. The dfs for Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Behavior Therapy, and Family Therapy were 122, 120, and 122, respectively.

*

p<.05.

**

p<.01.

***

p<.001.