Table 2.
Results of the strategy analysis
| Strategy | Patient |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P01 | P02 | P03 | P04 | |
| 1. Spatial + non-spatial associative | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.08 |
| 2. Single shape | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.19 |
| 3. Single position | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.43 | 0.26 |
| 4. Non-spatial associative + random | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.11 |
| 5. Spatial associative + random | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.13 |
| 6. Random | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.16 |
Scores in this table reflect the fit of each patient's individual responses to responses generated by the model, for each of the six strategy types separately. Scores were obtained by taking the squared difference between the number of sun responses generated by a subject and the number generated by the model, summed across all eight patterns. Score were normalised to yield a number between 0 and 1. The lowest of the six scores pertaining to the six strategy types, if less than 0.1, was taken as evidence that the subject was consistently following this strategy (see Section 2).