Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2007 Apr 8;29(9):1296–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.03.007

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Regression lines with 95% confidence intervals of spinophilin-immunoreactive puncta (in billions) versus Braak NFT staging, Aβ deposition staging, MMSE, and CDR scores in the CA1 field and area 9. Note the significant negative association between Braak NFT staging and total spinophilin-immunoreactive puncta in both the CA1 field and area 9. Note also the negative relationship between clinical indices and total spinophilin-immunoreactive puncta in the same areas. See text for details.