Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2005 May 1;174(9):5215–5223. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.9.5215

Table I.

Summary of phenotypic changes in tetramer+ CD8 memory T cells

Tet+a
%
FSC
(MFI)
CD25 %
(MFI)b
CD69
%
CD45RA
%
CD45RO
%
CCR7 %
(MFI)
CD62L
%
Patient 1
No stimc 1.6 (325) 0 (5) 0.8 88.5 67.8 0.1 (6) 0.2
Stim 4.2 (491) 98.2 (234) 77.3 51.5 99.7 14.8 (25) 3.5
Stim + TGF-β1 5.4 (456) 85.9 (156) 72.6 39.9 99.1 79.1 (52) 2
Patient 2
No stim 1.6 (317) 0.3 (5) 5.7 99.4 39 1.5 (13) 1.4
Stim 2.4 (464) 98.1 (426) 56.3 48.6 99.7 8.9 (30) 3.1
Stim + TGF-β1 3.8 (416) 54.1 (106) 49.7 55.7 99.6 26.4 (38) 0.7
Patient 3
No stim 0.5 (306) 0.8 (6) 51.3 97.6 91.6 6.0 (12) 2.9
Stim 2.1 (466) 100 (1352) 42.4 20.3 99.5 77.1 (179) 2.8
Stim + TGF-β1 3.2 (477) 99.9 (1347) 48.6 20.4 99.8 99.1 (373) 2.3
a

Percent tetramer+ cells in CD8+ population.

b

Percent tetramer+ cells expressing surface marker; MFI is for the entire tetramer+ population.

c

Stim, stimulation.