Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1991 Feb 2;112(4):557–566. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.4.557

The nuclear membrane determines the timing of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts

PMCID: PMC2288850  PMID: 1993731

Abstract

We have exploited a property of chicken erythrocyte nuclei to analyze the regulation of DNA replication in a cell-free system from Xenopus eggs. Many individual demembranated nuclei added to the extract often became enclosed within a common nuclear membrane. Nuclei within such a "multinuclear aggregate" lacked individual membranes but shared the perimeter membrane of the aggregate. Individual nuclei that were excluded from the aggregates initiated DNA synthesis at different times over a 10-12-h period, as judged by incorporation of biotinylated dUTP into discrete replication foci at early times, followed by uniformly intense incorporation at later times. Replication forks were clustered in spots, rings, and horseshoe-shaped structures similar to those described in cultured cells. In contrast to the asynchronous replication seen between individual nuclei, replication within multinuclear aggregates was synchronous. There was a uniform distribution and similar fluorescent intensity of the replication foci throughout all the nuclei enclosed within the same membrane. However, different multinuclear aggregates replicated out of synchrony with each other indicating that each membrane-bound aggregate acts as an individual unit of replication. These data indicate that the nuclear membrane defines the unit of DNA replication and determines the timing of DNA synthesis in egg extract resulting in highly coordinated triggering of DNA replication on the DNA it encloses.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bates D. L., Butler P. J., Pearson E. C., Thomas J. O. Stability of the higher-order structure of chicken-erythrocyte chromatin in solution. Eur J Biochem. 1981 Oct;119(3):469–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blow J. J., Laskey R. A. A role for the nuclear envelope in controlling DNA replication within the cell cycle. Nature. 1988 Apr 7;332(6164):546–548. doi: 10.1038/332546a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blow J. J., Laskey R. A. Initiation of DNA replication in nuclei and purified DNA by a cell-free extract of Xenopus eggs. Cell. 1986 Nov 21;47(4):577–587. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90622-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blow J. J., Sleeman A. M. Replication of purified DNA in Xenopus egg extract is dependent on nuclear assembly. J Cell Sci. 1990 Mar;95(Pt 3):383–391. doi: 10.1242/jcs.95.3.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blow J. J., Watson J. V. Nuclei act as independent and integrated units of replication in a Xenopus cell-free DNA replication system. EMBO J. 1987 Jul;6(7):1997–2002. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02463.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bravo R., Macdonald-Bravo H. Existence of two populations of cyclin/proliferating cell nuclear antigen during the cell cycle: association with DNA replication sites. J Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;105(4):1549–1554. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.4.1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coppock D. L., Lue R. A., Wangh L. J. Replication of Xenopus erythrocyte nuclei in a homologous egg extract requires prior proteolytic treatment. Dev Biol. 1989 Jan;131(1):102–110. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(89)80041-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cox L. S., Leno G. H. Extracts from eggs and oocytes of Xenopus laevis differ in their capacities for nuclear assembly and DNA replication. J Cell Sci. 1990 Sep;97(Pt 1):177–184. doi: 10.1242/jcs.97.1.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ege T., Zeuthen J., Ringertz N. R. Reactivation of chick erythrocyte nuclei after fusion with enucleated cells. Somatic Cell Genet. 1975 Jan;1(1):65–80. doi: 10.1007/BF01538732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Finlay D. R., Newmeyer D. D., Price T. M., Forbes D. J. Inhibition of in vitro nuclear transport by a lectin that binds to nuclear pores. J Cell Biol. 1987 Feb;104(2):189–200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.2.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Greenspan P., Mayer E. P., Fowler S. D. Nile red: a selective fluorescent stain for intracellular lipid droplets. J Cell Biol. 1985 Mar;100(3):965–973. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.3.965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hutchison C. J., Cox R., Drepaul R. S., Gomperts M., Ford C. C. Periodic DNA synthesis in cell-free extracts of Xenopus eggs. EMBO J. 1987 Jul;6(7):2003–2010. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02464.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lafond R. E., Woodcock C. L. Status of the nuclear matrix in mature and embryonic chick erythrocyte nuclei. Exp Cell Res. 1983 Aug;147(1):31–39. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(83)90268-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Langer P. R., Waldrop A. A., Ward D. C. Enzymatic synthesis of biotin-labeled polynucleotides: novel nucleic acid affinity probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):6633–6637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.6633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Laskey R. A., Fairman M. P., Blow J. J. S phase of the cell cycle. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):609–614. doi: 10.1126/science.2683076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lipsich L. A., Lucas J. J., Kates J. R. Cell cycle dependence of the reactivation of chick erythrocyte nuclei after transplantation into mouse L929 cell cytoplasts. J Cell Physiol. 1978 Nov;97(2):199–207. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040970209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lohka M. J., Masui Y. Formation in vitro of sperm pronuclei and mitotic chromosomes induced by amphibian ooplasmic components. Science. 1983 May 13;220(4598):719–721. doi: 10.1126/science.6601299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lohka M. J., Masui Y. Roles of cytosol and cytoplasmic particles in nuclear envelope assembly and sperm pronuclear formation in cell-free preparations from amphibian eggs. J Cell Biol. 1984 Apr;98(4):1222–1230. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.4.1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mills A. D., Blow J. J., White J. G., Amos W. B., Wilcock D., Laskey R. A. Replication occurs at discrete foci spaced throughout nuclei replicating in vitro. J Cell Sci. 1989 Nov;94(Pt 3):471–477. doi: 10.1242/jcs.94.3.471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nakamura H., Morita T., Sato C. Structural organizations of replicon domains during DNA synthetic phase in the mammalian nucleus. Exp Cell Res. 1986 Aug;165(2):291–297. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(86)90583-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nakayasu H., Berezney R. Mapping replicational sites in the eucaryotic cell nucleus. J Cell Biol. 1989 Jan;108(1):1–11. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Newport J. Nuclear reconstitution in vitro: stages of assembly around protein-free DNA. Cell. 1987 Jan 30;48(2):205–217. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90424-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sheehan M. A., Mills A. D., Sleeman A. M., Laskey R. A., Blow J. J. Steps in the assembly of replication-competent nuclei in a cell-free system from Xenopus eggs. J Cell Biol. 1988 Jan;106(1):1–12. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. de Bruyn Kops A., Knipe D. M. Formation of DNA replication structures in herpes virus-infected cells requires a viral DNA binding protein. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):857–868. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90141-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES