Abstract
Several sets of amino acid surface areas and transfer free energies were used to derive a total of nine sets of atomic solvation parameters (ASPs). We tested the accuracy of each of these sets of parameters in predicting the experimentally determined transfer free energies of the amino acid derivatives from which the parameters were derived. In all cases, the calculated and experimental values correlated well. We then chose three parameter sets and examined the effect of adding an energetic correction for desolvation based on these three parameter sets to the simple potential function used in our multiple start Monte Carlo docking method. A variety of protein-protein interactions and docking results were examined. In the docking simulations studied, the desolvation correction was only applied during the final energy calculation of each simulation. For most of the docking results we analyzed, the use of an octanol-water-based ASP set marginally improved the energetic ranking of the low-energy dockings, whereas the other ASP sets we tested disturbed the ranking of the low-energy dockings in many of the same systems. We also examined the correlation between the experimental free energies of association and our calculated interaction energies for a series of proteinase-inhibitor complexes. Again, the octanol-water-based ASP set was compatible with our standard potential function, whereas ASP sets derived from other solvent systems were not.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Abagyan R., Totrov M. Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 21;235(3):983–1002. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abraham D. J., Leo A. J. Extension of the fragment method to calculate amino acid zwitterion and side chain partition coefficients. Proteins. 1987;2(2):130–152. doi: 10.1002/prot.340020207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bacon D. J., Moult J. Docking by least-squares fitting of molecular surface patterns. J Mol Biol. 1992 Jun 5;225(3):849–858. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90405-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J., Meyer E. F., Jr, Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cherfils J., Bizebard T., Knossow M., Janin J. Rigid-body docking with mutant constraints of influenza hemagglutinin with antibody HC19. Proteins. 1994 Jan;18(1):8–18. doi: 10.1002/prot.340180104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cummings M. D., Hart T. N., Read R. J. Monte Carlo docking with ubiquitin. Protein Sci. 1995 May;4(5):885–899. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eisenberg D., McLachlan A. D. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature. 1986 Jan 16;319(6050):199–203. doi: 10.1038/319199a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans S. V. SETOR: hardware-lighted three-dimensional solid model representations of macromolecules. J Mol Graph. 1993 Jun;11(2):134-8, 127-8. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(93)87009-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hart T. N., Read R. J. A multiple-start Monte Carlo docking method. Proteins. 1992 Jul;13(3):206–222. doi: 10.1002/prot.340130304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holtzer A. Does Flory-Huggins theory help in interpreting solute partitioning experiments? Biopolymers. 1994 Mar;34(3):315–320. doi: 10.1002/bip.360340303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horton N., Lewis M. Calculation of the free energy of association for protein complexes. Protein Sci. 1992 Jan;1(1):169–181. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560010117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janin J., Miller S., Chothia C. Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins. J Mol Biol. 1988 Nov 5;204(1):155–164. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90606-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KAUZMANN W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv Protein Chem. 1959;14:1–63. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60608-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Komine S., Yoshida K., Yamashita H., Masaki Z. Voiding dysfunction in patients with human T-lymphotropic virus type-1-associated myelopathy (HAM). Paraplegia. 1989 Jun;27(3):217–221. doi: 10.1038/sc.1989.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lesser G. J., Rose G. D. Hydrophobicity of amino acid subgroups in proteins. Proteins. 1990;8(1):6–13. doi: 10.1002/prot.340080104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ooi T., Oobatake M., Némethy G., Scheraga H. A. Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(10):3086–3090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.10.3086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radzicka A., Young G. B., Wolfenden R. Lack of water transport by amino acid side chains or peptides entering a nonpolar environment. Biochemistry. 1993 Jul 13;32(27):6807–6809. doi: 10.1021/bi00078a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharp K. A., Nicholls A., Friedman R., Honig B. Extracting hydrophobic free energies from experimental data: relationship to protein folding and theoretical models. Biochemistry. 1991 Oct 8;30(40):9686–9697. doi: 10.1021/bi00104a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shoichet B. K., Kuntz I. D. Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol. 1991 Sep 5;221(1):327–346. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)80222-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolfenden R., Andersson L., Cullis P. M., Southgate C. C. Affinities of amino acid side chains for solvent water. Biochemistry. 1981 Feb 17;20(4):849–855. doi: 10.1021/bi00507a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- von Freyberg B., Richmond T. J., Braun W. Surface area included in energy refinement of proteins. A comparative study on atomic solvation parameters. J Mol Biol. 1993 Sep 20;233(2):275–292. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
