Abstract
Objective: We analysed and mapped the distribution of four reportable sexually transmitted diseases, chlamydial infection/non-gonococcal urethritis (chlamydial infection), gonorrhoea, primary and secondary syphilis (syphilis), and HIV infection, for Wake County, North Carolina, to optimise an intervention.
Methods: We used STD surveillance data reported to Wake County, for the year 2000 to analyse and map STD rates. STD rates were mathematically represented as a spatial random field. We analysed spatial variability by calculating and modelling covariance functions of random field theory. Covariances are useful in assessing spatial patterns of disease locally and at a distance. We combined observed STD rates and appropriate covariance models using a geostatistical method called kriging, to predict STD rates and associated prediction errors for a grid covering Wake County. Final disease estimates were interpolated using a spline with tension and mapped to generate a continuous surface of infection.
Results: Lower incidence STDs exhibited larger spatial variability and smaller neighbourhoods of influence than higher incidence STDs. Each reported STD had a clustered spatial distribution with one primary core area of infection. Core areas overlapped for all four STDs.
Conclusions: Spatial heterogeneity within STD suggests that STD specific prevention strategies should not be targeted uniformly across Wake County, but rather to core areas. Overlap of core areas among STDs suggests that intervention and prevention strategies can be combined to target multiple STDs effectively. Geostatistical techniques are objective, population level approaches to spatial analysis and mapping that can be used to visualise disease patterns and identify emerging outbreaks.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (196.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Becker K. M., Glass G. E., Brathwaite W., Zenilman J. M. Geographic epidemiology of gonorrhea in Baltimore, Maryland, using a geographic information system. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr 1;147(7):709–716. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carrat F., Valleron A. J. Epidemiologic mapping using the "kriging" method: application to an influenza-like illness epidemic in France. Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Jun 1;135(11):1293–1300. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellen J. M., Hessol N. A., Kohn R. P., Bolan G. A. An investigation of geographic clustering of repeat cases of gonorrhea and chlamydial infection in San Francisco, 1989-1993: evidence for core groups. J Infect Dis. 1997 Jun;175(6):1519–1522. doi: 10.1086/516491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elliott L. J., Blanchard J. F., Beaudoin C. M., Green C. G., Nowicki D. L., Matusko P., Moses S. Geographical variations in the epidemiology of bacterial sexually transmitted infections in Manitoba, Canada. Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Apr;78 (Suppl 1):i139–i144. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.suppl_1.i139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleinschmidt I., Sharp B. L., Clarke G. P., Curtis B., Fraser C. Use of generalized linear mixed models in the spatial analysis of small-area malaria incidence rates in Kwazulu Natal, South Africa. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Jun 15;153(12):1213–1221. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.12.1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lacey C. J., Merrick D. W., Bensley D. C., Fairley I. Analysis of the sociodemography of gonorrhoea in Leeds, 1989-93. BMJ. 1997 Jun 14;314(7096):1715–1718. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7096.1715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Low N., Daker-White G., Barlow D., Pozniak A. L. Gonorrhoea in inner London: results of a cross sectional study. BMJ. 1997 Jun 14;314(7096):1719–1723. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7096.1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oliver M. A., Muir K. R., Webster R., Parkes S. E., Cameron A. H., Stevens M. C., Mann J. R. A geostatistical approach to the analysis of pattern in rare disease. J Public Health Med. 1992 Sep;14(3):280–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rothenberg R. B. The geography of gonorrhea. Empirical demonstration of core group transmission. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Jun;117(6):688–694. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shahmanesh M., Gayed S., Ashcroft M., Smith R., Roopnarainsingh R., Dunn J., Ross J. Geomapping of chlamydia and gonorrhoea in Birmingham. Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Aug;76(4):268–272. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.4.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas J. C., Tucker M. J. The development and use of the concept of a sexually transmitted disease core. J Infect Dis. 1996 Oct;174 (Suppl 2):S134–S143. doi: 10.1093/infdis/174.supplement_2.s134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waller L. A. A civil action and statistical assessments of the spatial pattern of disease: do we have a cluster? Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000 Oct;32(2):174–183. doi: 10.1006/rtph.2000.1428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zenilman J. M., Ellish N., Fresia A., Glass G. The geography of sexual partnerships in Baltimore: applications of core theory dynamics using a geographic information system. Sex Transm Dis. 1999 Feb;26(2):75–81. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199902000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zenilman J. M., Glass G., Shields T., Jenkins P. R., Gaydos J. C., McKee K. T., Jr Geographic epidemiology of gonorrhoea and chlamydia on a large military installation: application of a GIS system. Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Feb;78(1):40–44. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.1.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zimmerman H. L., Potterat J. J., Dukes R. L., Muth J. B., Zimmerman H. P., Fogle J. S., Pratts C. I. Epidemiologic differences between chlamydia and gonorrhea. Am J Public Health. 1990 Nov;80(11):1338–1342. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.11.1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]