Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1998 May;79(5):493–496. doi: 10.1136/hrt.79.5.493

Circadian rhythm of the signal averaged electrocardiogram and its relation to heart rate variability in healthy subjects

M Nakagawa 1, T Iwao 1, S Ishida 1, H Yonemochi 1, T Fujino 1, T Saikawa 1, M Ito 1
PMCID: PMC1728677  PMID: 9659198

Abstract

Objective—To examine the circadian variation in the signal averaged electrocardiogram (saECG) and heart rate variability and investigate their relations in healthy subjects.
Methods—24 hour ECGs were obtained with a three channel recorder using bipolar X, Y, and Z leads in 20 healthy subjects. The following variables were determined hourly: heart rate, filtered QRS (f-QRS) duration, low and high frequency components of heart rate variability (LF and HF), and the LF/HF ratio.
Results—Heart rate, f-QRS duration, HF, and the LF/HF ratio showed significant circadian rhythms, as determined by the single cosinor method. Heart rate and the LF/HF ratio increased during daytime, and f-QRS duration and HF increased at night. f-QRS duration was negatively correlated with heart rate (r = 0.95, p < 0.001) and the LF/HF ratio (r = 0.94, p < 0.001) and positively with HF (r = 0.93, p < 0.001).
Conclusions—f-QRS duration has a significant circadian rhythm in healthy subjects and is closely related to the circadian rhythm of autonomic tone.

 Keywords: signal averaged ECG;  f-QRS duration;  circadian rhythm;  heart rate variability

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (129.8 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Circadian rhythm of the hourly means of heart rate (A), f-QRS duration (B), ln HF (C), and ln LF/HF (D) in 20 subjects. Solid lines represent curves fitted to the data by the single cosinor method. LF and HF, low and high frequency components, respectively, of heart rate variability; LF/HF, LF to HF ratio.

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Signal averaged electrocardiogram recordings from a healthy 24 year old woman at 05:00 (A) and at 11:00 (B). Note that the increase of the heart rate from 63 (A) to 76 beats/min (B) was associated with an increase in ln LF/HF and a decrease in ln HF and f-QRS duration, but with no change in the noise level. LF and HF, low and high frequency components, respectively, of heart rate variability; LF/HF, LF to HF ratio.

Figure 3  .

Figure 3  

Open in a new tab

Correlations between the hourly means of the f-QRS duration and heart rate (A), ln HF (B), and ln LF/HF (C) in 20 subjects. LF and HF, low and high frequency components, respectively, of heart rate variability; LF/HF, LF to HF ratio.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Engel T. R., Pierce D. L., Murphy S. P. Variation in late potentials and the reproducibility of their measurement. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1993 Jan-Feb;35(4):247–262. doi: 10.1016/0033-0620(93)90006-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Furlan R., Guzzetti S., Crivellaro W., Dassi S., Tinelli M., Baselli G., Cerutti S., Lombardi F., Pagani M., Malliani A. Continuous 24-hour assessment of the neural regulation of systemic arterial pressure and RR variabilities in ambulant subjects. Circulation. 1990 Feb;81(2):537–547. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.81.2.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldberger J. J., Ahmed M. W., Parker M. A., Kadish A. H. Assessment of effects of autonomic stimulation and blockade on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Circulation. 1994 Apr;89(4):1656–1664. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.4.1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gomes J. A., Winters S. L., Stewart D., Horowitz S., Milner M., Barreca P. A new noninvasive index to predict sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in the first year after myocardial infarction: based on signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ejection fraction and Holter monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Aug;10(2):349–357. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80018-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Greenspon A. J., Volosin K. The effects of atrial pacing on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 1990 Jan;119(1):29–34. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(05)80077-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hayano J., Sakakibara Y., Yamada M., Ohte N., Fujinami T., Yokoyama K., Watanabe Y., Takata K. Decreased magnitude of heart rate spectral components in coronary artery disease. Its relation to angiographic severity. Circulation. 1990 Apr;81(4):1217–1224. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.81.4.1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Huikuri H. V., Niemelä M. J., Ojala S., Rantala A., Ikäheimo M. J., Airaksinen K. E. Circadian rhythms of frequency domain measures of heart rate variability in healthy subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Effects of arousal and upright posture. Circulation. 1994 Jul;90(1):121–126. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.1.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kanovsky M. S., Falcone R. A., Dresden C. A., Josephson M. E., Simson M. B. Identification of patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring, and cardiac catheterization. Circulation. 1984 Aug;70(2):264–270. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.70.2.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kremers M. S., Black W. H., Lange R., Wells P. J., Solo M. Electrocardiographic signal-averaging during atrial pacing and effect of cycle length on the terminal QRS in patients with and without inducible ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1990 Nov 1;66(15):1095–1098. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90511-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lombardi F., Sandrone G., Mortara A., La Rovere M. T., Colombo E., Guzzetti S., Malliani A. Circadian variation of spectral indices of heart rate variability after myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1992 Jun;123(6):1521–1529. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90804-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Malliani A., Pagani M., Lombardi F., Cerutti S. Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation. 1991 Aug;84(2):482–492. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.2.482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mancini D. M., Wong K. L., Simson M. B. Prognostic value of an abnormal signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with nonischemic congestive cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1993 Apr;87(4):1083–1092. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Munger T. M., Johnson S. B., Packer D. L. Voltage dependence of beta-adrenergic modulation of conduction in the canine Purkinje fiber. Circ Res. 1994 Sep;75(3):511–519. doi: 10.1161/01.res.75.3.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nakagawa M., Oda M., Iwao T., Ishida S., Yonemochi H., Fujino T., Saikawa T., Ito M. Signal-averaged electrocardiogram shows a heart rate dependent diurnal variation in healthy subjects. Jpn Heart J. 1998 Mar;39(2):147–152. doi: 10.1536/ihj.39.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nelson W., Tong Y. L., Lee J. K., Halberg F. Methods for cosinor-rhythmometry. Chronobiologia. 1979 Oct-Dec;6(4):305–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ono K., Fozzard H. A., Hanck D. A. Mechanism of cAMP-dependent modulation of cardiac sodium channel current kinetics. Circ Res. 1993 Apr;72(4):807–815. doi: 10.1161/01.res.72.4.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pagani M., Lombardi F., Guzzetti S., Rimoldi O., Furlan R., Pizzinelli P., Sandrone G., Malfatto G., Dell'Orto S., Piccaluga E. Power spectral analysis of heart rate and arterial pressure variabilities as a marker of sympatho-vagal interaction in man and conscious dog. Circ Res. 1986 Aug;59(2):178–193. doi: 10.1161/01.res.59.2.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Quyyumi A. A. Circadian rhythms in cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 1990 Sep;120(3):726–733. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(90)90044-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Simson M. B. Use of signals in the terminal QRS complex to identify patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1981 Aug;64(2):235–242. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.2.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith G. S., Vacek J. L., Wilson D. B., Hawkins J. W., Boyer T. A. Exercise-induced alterations of signal-averaged electrocardiograms in marathon runners. Am Heart J. 1989 Dec;118(6):1198–1202. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(89)90010-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Steinberg J. S., Bigger J. T., Jr Importance of the endpoint of noise reduction in analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Mar 1;63(9):556–560. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90898-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Steinberg J. S., Regan A., Sciacca R. R., Bigger J. T., Jr, Fleiss J. L. Predicting arrhythmic events after acute myocardial infarction using the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Jan 1;69(1):13–21. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90669-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wood M. A., Simpson P. M., London W. B., Stambler B. S., Herre J. M., Bernstein R. C., Ellenbogen K. A. Circadian pattern of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Mar 15;25(4):901–907. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00460-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES