Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Jun 22;271(1545):1225–1234. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2732

Protein networks, pleiotropy and the evolution of senescence.

Daniel E L Promislow 1
PMCID: PMC1691725  PMID: 15306346

Abstract

The number of interactions, or connectivity, among proteins in the yeast protein interaction network follows a power law. I compare patterns of connectivity for subsets of yeast proteins associated with senescence and with five other traits. I find that proteins associated with ageing have significantly higher connectivity than expected by chance, a pattern not seen for most other datasets. The pattern holds even when controlling for other factors also associated with connectivity, such as localization of protein expression within the cell. I suggest that these observations are consistent with the antagonistic pleiotropy theory for the evolution of senescence. In further support of this argument, I find that a protein's connectivity is positively correlated with the number of traits it influences or its degree of pleiotropy, and further show that the average degree of pleiotropy is greatest for proteins associated with senescence. I explain these results with a simple mathematical model combining assumptions of the antagonistic pleiotropy theory for the evolution of senescence with data on network topology. These findings integrate molecular and evolutionary models of senescence, and should aid in the search for new ageing genes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (360.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albert R, Jeong H, Barabasi AL. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature. 2000 Jul 27;406(6794):378–382. doi: 10.1038/35019019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albert Réka, Othmer Hans G. The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. J Theor Biol. 2003 Jul 7;223(1):1–18. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00035-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartke A., Chandrashekar V., Dominici F., Turyn D., Kinney B., Steger R., Kopchick J. J. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and aging: controversies and new insights. Biogerontology. 2003;4(1):1–8. doi: 10.1023/a:1022448532248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergman Aviv, Siegal Mark L. Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature. 2003 Jul 31;424(6948):549–552. doi: 10.1038/nature01765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charlesworth B. Patterns of age-specific means and genetic variances of mortality rates predicted by the mutation-accumulation theory of ageing. J Theor Biol. 2001 May 7;210(1):47–65. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cliften Paul, Sudarsanam Priya, Desikan Ashwin, Fulton Lucinda, Fulton Bob, Majors John, Waterston Robert, Cohen Barak A., Johnston Mark. Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting. Science. 2003 May 29;301(5629):71–76. doi: 10.1126/science.1084337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fraser Hunter B., Hirsh Aaron E., Steinmetz Lars M., Scharfe Curt, Feldman Marcus W. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science. 2002 Apr 26;296(5568):750–752. doi: 10.1126/science.1068696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gershon H., Gershon D. The budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as a model for aging research: a critical review. Mech Ageing Dev. 2000 Dec 1;120(1-3):1–22. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(00)00182-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Giot L., Bader J. S., Brouwer C., Chaudhuri A., Kuang B., Li Y., Hao Y. L., Ooi C. E., Godwin B., Vitols E. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2003 Nov 6;302(5651):1727–1736. doi: 10.1126/science.1090289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hekimi Siegfried, Guarente Leonard. Genetics and the specificity of the aging process. Science. 2003 Feb 28;299(5611):1351–1354. doi: 10.1126/science.1082358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hornsby Peter J. Cellular senescence and tissue aging in vivo. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Jul;57(7):B251–B256. doi: 10.1093/gerona/57.7.b251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Huh Won-Ki, Falvo James V., Gerke Luke C., Carroll Adam S., Howson Russell W., Weissman Jonathan S., O'Shea Erin K. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature. 2003 Oct 16;425(6959):686–691. doi: 10.1038/nature02026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jeong H., Mason S. P., Barabási A. L., Oltvai Z. N. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature. 2001 May 3;411(6833):41–42. doi: 10.1038/35075138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jorgensen Paul, Nishikawa Joy L., Breitkreutz Bobby-Joe, Tyers Mike. Systematic identification of pathways that couple cell growth and division in yeast. Science. 2002 Jun 27;297(5580):395–400. doi: 10.1126/science.1070850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaeberlein Matt, Jegalian Beatrice, McVey Mitch. AGEID: a database of aging genes and interventions. Mech Ageing Dev. 2002 Apr 30;123(8):1115–1119. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(02)00011-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Khazaeli A. A., Pletcher S. D., Curtsinger J. W. The fractionation experiment: reducing heterogeneity to investigate age-specific mortality in Drosophila. Mech Ageing Dev. 1998 Nov 16;105(3):301–317. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(98)00102-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kowald A., Kirkwood T. B. A network theory of ageing: the interactions of defective mitochondria, aberrant proteins, free radicals and scavengers in the ageing process. Mutat Res. 1996 May;316(5-6):209–236. doi: 10.1016/s0921-8734(96)90005-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leips Jeff, Mackay Trudy F. C. The complex genetic architecture of Drosophila life span. Exp Aging Res. 2002 Oct-Dec;28(4):361–390. doi: 10.1080/03610730290080399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Letovsky Stanley, Kasif Simon. Predicting protein function from protein/protein interaction data: a probabilistic approach. Bioinformatics. 2003;19 (Suppl 1):i197–i204. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lithgow G. J., White T. M., Melov S., Johnson T. E. Thermotolerance and extended life-span conferred by single-gene mutations and induced by thermal stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 1;92(16):7540–7544. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.16.7540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Longo Valter D., Finch Caleb E. Evolutionary medicine: from dwarf model systems to healthy centenarians? Science. 2003 Feb 28;299(5611):1342–1346. doi: 10.1126/science.1077991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Murphy Coleen T., McCarroll Steven A., Bargmann Cornelia I., Fraser Andrew, Kamath Ravi S., Ahringer Julie, Li Hao, Kenyon Cynthia. Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2003 Jun 29;424(6946):277–283. doi: 10.1038/nature01789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rose M., Charlesworth B. A test of evolutionary theories of senescence. Nature. 1980 Sep 11;287(5778):141–142. doi: 10.1038/287141a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Salazar-Ciudad Isaac, Jernvall Jukka. A gene network model accounting for development and evolution of mammalian teeth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 4;99(12):8116–8120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.132069499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith J. S., Caputo E., Boeke J. D. A genetic screen for ribosomal DNA silencing defects identifies multiple DNA replication and chromatin-modulating factors. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Apr;19(4):3184–3197. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.4.3184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Spencer Christine C., Howell Christine E., Wright Amber R., Promislow Daniel E. L. Testing an 'aging gene' in long-lived drosophila strains: increased longevity depends on sex and genetic background. Aging Cell. 2003 Apr;2(2):123–130. doi: 10.1046/j.1474-9728.2003.00044.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sprinzak Einat, Sattath Shmuel, Margalit Hanah. How reliable are experimental protein-protein interaction data? J Mol Biol. 2003 Apr 11;327(5):919–923. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00239-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stelling Jörg, Klamt Steffen, Bettenbrock Katja, Schuster Stefan, Gilles Ernst Dieter. Metabolic network structure determines key aspects of functionality and regulation. Nature. 2002 Nov 14;420(6912):190–193. doi: 10.1038/nature01166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stevenson L. F., Kennedy B. K., Harlow E. A large-scale overexpression screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies previously uncharacterized cell cycle genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 27;98(7):3946–3951. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051013498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tatar Marc, Bartke Andrzej, Antebi Adam. The endocrine regulation of aging by insulin-like signals. Science. 2003 Feb 28;299(5611):1346–1351. doi: 10.1126/science.1081447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tong Amy Hin Yan, Lesage Guillaume, Bader Gary D., Ding Huiming, Xu Hong, Xin Xiaofeng, Young James, Berriz Gabriel F., Brost Renee L., Chang Michael. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science. 2004 Feb 6;303(5659):808–813. doi: 10.1126/science.1091317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wagner A. Robustness against mutations in genetic networks of yeast. Nat Genet. 2000 Apr;24(4):355–361. doi: 10.1038/74174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yu Haiyuan, Zhu Xiaowei, Greenbaum Dov, Karro John, Gerstein Mark. TopNet: a tool for comparing biological sub-networks, correlating protein properties with topological statistics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 14;32(1):328–337. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. de Jesus Ferreira M. C., Bao X., Laizé V., Hohmann S. Transposon mutagenesis reveals novel loci affecting tolerance to salt stress and growth at low temperature. Curr Genet. 2001 Aug;40(1):27–39. doi: 10.1007/s002940100237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. von Dassow G., Meir E., Munro E. M., Odell G. M. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature. 2000 Jul 13;406(6792):188–192. doi: 10.1038/35018085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. von Mering Christian, Krause Roland, Snel Berend, Cornell Michael, Oliver Stephen G., Fields Stanley, Bork Peer. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature. 2002 May 8;417(6887):399–403. doi: 10.1038/nature750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES