Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1991 Nov;95:7–13. doi: 10.1289/ehp.91957

Comparison of risks from outdoor and indoor exposure to toxic chemicals.

L A Wallace 1
PMCID: PMC1568414  PMID: 1821381

Abstract

Environmental Protection Agency TEAM (Total Exposure Assessment Measurement) Studies have measured exposures of about 800 persons to 25 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and exposures of about 300 persons to 32 pesticides. These persons were selected to represent more than 1 million residents of industrial manufacturing cities such as Bayonne and Elizabeth, New Jersey, and Los Angeles, California; cities with light industry, such as Greensboro, North Carolina, and Baltimore, Maryland; rural areas such as Devils Lake, North Dakota; and cities with high pesticide use such as Jacksonville, Florida, as well as low-to-moderate pesticide use such as Springfield, Massachusetts. The TEAM data provide an opportunity to estimate the risks from airborne exposure to a number of suspected carcinogens for a substantial number of persons residing in a wide variety of urban, suburban, and rural areas. Because all of the TEAM Studies measured outdoor concentrations near the homes of the participants, it is possible to apportion the risks between outdoor and indoor sources. Upper-bound lifetime risks of cancer are calculated for both indoor and outdoor sources of 12 VOCs and about 23 pesticides measured in the TEAM Studies. These risk calculations are supplemented by calculations based on other studies for some additional pollutants, including radon and environmental tobacco smoke. The relationship of these upper-bound risk estimates to "best-guess" values is discussed. Sharper estimates of risk based on identifying population subgroups exposed to major sources are also discussed. Important gaps in our knowledge of exposure measurements are identified, e.g., particulates (including polyaromatic hydrocarbons); 1,3-butadiene, asbestos, chromium, cadmium, arsenic, vinyl chloride, methylene chloride, and most polar organics.

Full text

PDF
7

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen B. C., Crump K. S., Shipp A. M. Correlation between carcinogenic potency of chemicals in animals and humans. Risk Anal. 1988 Dec;8(4):531–544. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01193.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mendes R. The scope of occupational health in developing countries. Am J Public Health. 1985 May;75(5):467–468. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.5.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wallace L. A., Pellizzari E. D., Hartwell T. D., Sparacino C., Whitmore R., Sheldon L., Zelon H., Perritt R. The TEAM (Total Exposure Assessment Methodology) Study: personal exposures to toxic substances in air, drinking water, and breath of 400 residents of New Jersey, North Carolina, and North Dakota. Environ Res. 1987 Aug;43(2):290–307. doi: 10.1016/s0013-9351(87)80030-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wallace L., Pellizzari E., Hartwell T. D., Perritt R., Ziegenfus R. Exposures to benzene and other volatile compounds from active and passive smoking. Arch Environ Health. 1987 Sep-Oct;42(5):272–279. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1987.9935820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES