Abstract
Type 2 Diabetes results from a complex physiologic process that includes the pancreatic beta cells, peripheral glucose uptake in muscle, the secretion of multiple cytokines and hormone-like molecules from adipocytes, hepatic glucose production, and likely the central nervous system. Consistent with the complex web of physiologic defects, the emerging picture of the genetics will involve a large number of risk susceptibility genes, each individually with relatively small effect (odds ratios below 1.2 in most cases). The challenge for the future will include cataloging and confirming the genetic risk factors, and understanding how these risk factors interact with each other and with the known environmental and lifestyle risk factors that increase the propensity to type 2 diabetes.
Type 2 Diabetes: A Prologue
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a complex heterogeneous group of metabolic condition characterized by elevated levels of serum glucose, caused mainly by impairment in both insulin action and insulin secretion. T2DM exerts a huge toll in human suffering and economy. A recent evaluation using a computerized generic formal disease model (DisMod II) revealed that excess global mortality due to diabetes in the year 2000 was equivalent to 5.2% of all deaths and diabetes is likely to be the fifth leading cause of death, similar in magnitude to numbers reported for HIV/AIDS (1). The prevalence of diabetes for all age-groups worldwide was estimated to be 2.8% in 2000 and is projected to be 4.4% in 2030 (most of which will be T2DM). The total number of people with diabetes is projected to rise from 171 million in 2000 to 366 million in 2030, with India, China and USA being the top 3 countries estimated to have the highest numbers of people with diabetes (2). T2DM accounts for 5–10% of the total health care budget in many countries. In the United States, the American Diabetes Association estimated the total cost of diabetes management in 2002 at $132 billion, which is about 1.3% of US gross domestic product (3,4).
The recent global epidemic of T2DM almost certainly indicates the importance of environmental triggers such as sedentary lifestyle and dietary changes over last several decades. Nonetheless, T2DM is among many complex diseases for which a genetic contribution is well accepted. Despite the diverse phenotypic nature of T2DM, twin and family studies, and the wide spectrum of diabetes prevalence across populations provide convincing evidence for an important role of
Identification of the genetic etiology of T2DM has proved challenging. Although many laboratories have chosen a genetic approach to define its pathophysiology, the molecular mechanisms for this strong genetic predisposition remain elusive. Based on epidemiological data, the total sibling relative risk (λs) for T2DM has been estimated at 3–4, although the number of loci that contribute to this risk is uncertain. Multiple genome scans and a plethora of candidate gene association studies of T2DM in conglomerate lead to the inescapable conclusion that early proposals of an oligogenic model of T2DM were overly optimistic. The increasingly complex physiologic picture reflects this multifaceted genetic landscape. Early views of T2DM as primarily a defect in insulin mediated muscle glucose uptake have been tempered by a new appreciation of the key roles of the pancreatic β-cell, the adipocyte as a secretory organ, a primary role of the liver, and possibly a key role of the central nervous system. Identification of the genetic components of type 2 diabetes is one of the most important areas of diabetes research because elucidation of the diabetes genes (alleles) will influence all efforts toward a mechanistic understanding of the disease, its complications, and its treatment, cure, and prevention. In this review we will discuss our current understanding of the genetic basis of the pathophysiology of Type 2 diabetes.
T2DM Is a Genetic Disease: Classical Evidence
Multiple lines of evidence support the view that genetic components plays an important role in the pathogenesis of T2DM.
The spectrum of T2DM prevalence in different ethnic groups’ The prevalence of T2DM varies widely among populations, from 1% in Chile Mapuche Indian, 2% among Caucasians in Europe to as high as 41% in the Nauru (Pacific Island) and 50% among Pima Indians in Arizona (5). Part of this observed ethnic variability can be attributed to non-genetic environmental and cultural factors; however, the observation that the disease prevalence varies substantially among ethnic groups that share a similar environment supports the idea that genetic factors contribute to disease predisposition.
Familial aggregation: Other than genes, families share environments, culture and habits, yet familial aggregation of the disease is another source of evidence for a genetic contribution to the disease. Evidence for a genetic role includes the nearly 4-fold increased risk for T2DM in siblings of a diabetic proband compared with the general population (λS of 3.5 to 4), the odds ratio (OR) of 3.4–3.5 with only a single affected parent, and the increase in the OR to 6.1 if both parents are affected (6).
Twin studies: Multiple studies of twin concordance rates have been undertaken in T2DM. Estimates for concordance rates have ranged from 0.29 to 1.00 in monozygotic (MZ) twins, while in dizygotic (DZ) twins the range was 0.10–0.43 (7–10). Concordance among both MZ and DZ twins increases with the duration of follow up period (10). In spite of several caveats in twin studies, the high concordance in MZ twins and the 50% fall in DZ twins provides compelling evidence for a genetic component of T2DM.
Heritability of intermediate phenotypes: Insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion deteriorate in parallel in most human T2DM. Both defects predicted subsequent T2DM in several studies and both defects are shown to be present in nondiabetic but genetically identical co-twins of a diabetic proband (11). Data from multiple laboratories, including ours, support a genetic basis for measures of both insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion (12–14).
Pathophysiology of T2DM: Current status
The early pathophysiology of T2DM remains uncertain and controversial. Three key defects mark the onset of hyperglycemia in T2DM: increased hepatic glucose production, diminished insulin secretion, and impaired insulin action (15,16). Unfortunately, at the time of hyperglycemia, glucose and possibly lipid toxicity obscure the primary effects. Prospective and cross-sectional analyses of euglycemic individuals at risk (relatives of T2DM individuals) circumvent this dilemma, and suggest a key early and predictive role of reduced insulin sensitivity in T2DM pathogenesis. Nonetheless, few individuals with genetic insulin resistance develop diabetes, and 25% of nondiabetic individuals may have insulin sensitivity as low as that seen in T2DM. The increase in hepatic glucose production was formerly viewed as a late event, occurring only at the onset of hyperglycemia and glucose intolerance. However, knock out murine models suggest a more primary role for hepatic insulin resistance.
The importance and timing of a β-cell defect have been hotly debated (17). Obese individuals, those with a family history of diabetes, and individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) are all characterized by absolute hyperinsulinemia until the development of overt hyperglycemia. However, when β-cell function is viewed in the context of reduced insulin sensitivity, considerable data support the early failure of insulin secretion in T2DM pathogenesis (18,19). Animal models also support this concept. Despite much study, the signals that cause normal β-cell compensation and hyperinsulinemia, the mechanisms of this compensation, the point in the pathogenesis of T2DM where this compensatory mechanism fails, and the etiology of this failure all remain subjects of speculation. Insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion deteriorate in parallel in most human T2DM. The remarkable difficulty in uncoupling these two defects may suggest a common mechanism.
Extensive investigation of humans and animal models has failed to clarify the key or early events that lead to the inexorable rise in plasma glucose and eventual insulin deficiency. Current models, which propose a role for multiple pathways affecting multiple organs, suggest a complex genetic substructure. Most glucose after a meal is taken up by skeletal muscle, with adipose playing a much smaller role. Traditionally, resistance to insulin mediated, non-oxidative glucose metabolism was viewed as the early and primary defect leading to T2DM. More recently, the progressive failure of the β-cell to compensate for insulin resistance has received considerable attention (19), but the role of liver and adipose had been considered late or relatively insignificant factors, respectively. Animal models have challenged even this paradigm. Muscle-specific insulin receptor (INSR) inactivation did not lead to IGT despite insulin resistance, whereas muscle specific inactivation of glucose transporter GLUT4 caused both profound insulin resistance and T2DM (20). Unexpectedly, GLUT4 inactivation limited to white adipose resulted in insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, and even T2DM with an impairment in whole body glucose uptake markedly out of proportion to the expected contribution of white adipose (20). This isolated defect in white adipose resulted in defective insulin action in both muscle and liver. Paradoxically, inactivation of the adipocyte insulin receptor gene resulted in improved insulin sensitivity and protection against obesity. These studies suggest a central and previously under-appreciated role for adipocytes in the pathogenesis of T2DM. However, insulin receptor inactivation in the liver also resulted in hyperinsulinemia, hepatic insulin resistance, and peripheral insulin resistance (21–24). These studies suggest considerable crosstalk among organ systems, as well as an important role for insulin signaling pathways in the β-cell (25). Thus, T2DM is the final outcome of a multiorgan disease which is characterized by early direct or indirect defects in muscle, adipocytes, hepatocytes, β-cells, and possibly the central nervous system (CNS).
Cytokines, Adipokines and Inflammation
Insulin stimulated glucose uptake into muscle cells and adipocytes depends mostly on the glucose transporter GLUT4, skeletal muscle being the principal site for this glucose uptake. Downregulation of GLUT4 expression in adipose tissue is a common feature of insulin-resistant states, including obesity, T2DM, and the metabolic syndrome (26). Given that skeletal muscle is the major site for glucose disposal, the hyperglycemia associated with obesity and T2DM cannot be explained by the decreased uptake of glucose into adipose tissue due to downregulation of GLUT4 in adipocytes. Furthermore, adipocyte-selective knockout of GLUT4 (adipose-Glut4 −/−) in mice resulted in systemic insulin resistance similar to that induced by muscle-selective GLUT4 knockout mice (muscle-Glut4 −/−, 27,28). These studies suggest that adipocyte GLUT4 deficiency results in circulating factors that are responsible for cross-organ communication (“crosstalk”). Yang et. al (29) recently identified retinol binding protein-4 (RBP4) as one candidate for that crosstalk in the adipose tissue of adipose-specific Glut4 knockout mice. Furthermore, serum RBP4 protein levels were elevated in insulin-resistant mice and obese and diabetic humans. Transgenic overexpression of the human RBP4 gene or injection of recombinant RBP4 protein in normal mice caused insulin resistance, whereas Rbp4 knockout mice had enhanced insulin sensitivity (29). Increased serum RBP4 protein levels induced hepatic expression of the gluconeogenic enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and impaired insulin signaling in muscle.
Investigators have proposed other potential mediators of inter-organ crosstalk to explain T2DM pathogenesis. Obesity predisposes to insulin resistance and T2DM. Adipocytes, both visceral and peripheral, secrete a plethora of factors which may alter systemic insulin action and hepatic glucose production, including adiponectin, resistin, leptin, cytokines IL-6 and TNFα, visfatin, retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4), as well as free fatty acids (FFA) (30–32). In recent years, the concept that obesity and elevated cytokine secretion results in an inflammatory state that is itself the cause of insulin resistance has emerged (32–34). The inhibition of signaling downstream of the insulin receptor may be a primary mechanism through which this inflammatory state causes insulin resistance. Exposure of cells to TNF-α or elevated levels of free fatty acids stimulates phosphorylation of serine residues of IRS-1. This phosphorylation reduces tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 in response to insulin, and thus signaling downstream of IRS-1 (35–38). The inflammatory state is increased by the accumulation of macrophages in adipose tissue with obesity (39;40). Thus, both adipose tissue and the macrophages within adipose tissue serve in both endocrine and paracrine fashion to promote inflammation and decrease insulin sensitivity (32,33).
Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response and Diabetes
Metabolic and inflammatory stresses of obesity may also disrupt cell metabolism, particularly the processing of cellular proteins in the secretory cells of the liver, pancreas, and adipocyte. The response to this increased demand is the endoplasmic reticulum stress response pathway, which activates an extensive cascade which shuts down further translation, increases the transcription of chaperone proteins, and if not successful, causes cellular apoptosis (41–43). Among the activated proteins are IRE1 and XBP1. Özcan and colleagues (42) showed recently that the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway is active in adipose tissue and in the liver from obese mice, leading to increased activation of c-jun N terminal kinase (JNK), which in turn phosphorylates IRS-1 on serine residues, thus suppressing insulin action and downstream signaling pathways. Similar data also support a role for endoplasmic reticulum stress pathways in β-cell dysfunction and apoptosis (44).
Endoplasmic reticulum stress is a molecular link between obesity, decreased insulin sensitivity and type 2 diabetes. Additionally, increased glucose metabolism can lead to a rise in mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Inflammatory pathways can be initiated by extracellular mediators such as cytokines and lipids or by intracellular stresses such as endoplasmic reticulum stress or excess ROS production by mitochondria. Signals from all of these mediators converge on inflammatory signaling pathways, including the kinases JNK and IKK. These pathways lead to the production of additional inflammatory mediators through transcriptional regulation as well as to the direct inhibition of insulin signaling (45,46).
Mitochondria and Reactive Oxygen Species
Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are another factor suggested to have a role in insulin resistance. ROS production is elevated in obesity, which in turn causes enhanced activation of inflammatory pathways (47,48). Several lines of evidence support the association of oxidative stress markers with diabetes (47–49). Houstis et al (50) recently connected these mechanisms by showing that treatment of 3T3-L1 adipocyte with either TNFα (an inflammatory cytokine that is elevated in obesity) or dexamethasone (an anti-inflammatory agent that causes insulin resistance) increased the ROS level and resulted in decreased insulin action. Antioxidant molecules or transgenes encoding ROS scavenging enzymes both ameliorated the insulin resistance of TNFα or dexamethasone treated 3T3-L1 adipocytes to varying degrees. Furthermore, antioxidant molecules improved insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis in obese, insulin resistant ob/ob mice (50). Oxidative stress is also likely to be involved in progression of pancreatic β-cell dysfunction in T2DM.
Reduced mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation has recently been demonstrated in several studies, using both microarrays to identify downregulated genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS genes). PGC1 appears to be at least partially responsible for this defect (51,52). Supportive studies in humans have suggested a role for defective mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and reduced numbers of skeletal muscle mitochondria in T2DM pathogenesis, and have suggested that increased intramyocellular lipid content was associated with defects in mitochondrial activity (53–56). Morino et al (56) found 38% less mitochondrial density in muscle of insulin resistant (IR) individuals compared to controls, which was associated with a 50% increase in serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and a 60% reduction in insulin stimulated Akt activation (a measure of insulin signaling). Decreased mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, caused by either mitochondrial dysfunction and/or reduced mitochondrial numbers, produces increased levels of intracellular fatty acyl CoA and diacylglycerol. These molecules activate a novel protein kinase C, which in turn activates a serine kinase cascade, again leading to increased serine phosphorylation of IRS-1. As described above, serine phosphorylation blocks IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation and inhibits downstream signaling, including recruitment of GLUT4 to the plasma membrane and insulin-mediated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle (53).
Oxidative Metabolism and the Pancreatic β-Cell
Insulin secretion by the pancreatic β-cell is modulated by multiple stimuli. Oxidative mitochondrial metabolism and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) generation is essential to glucose stimulated insulin secretion. The increased ratio of ATP to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in the β-cell triggers a series of events: inhibition of the cell’s ATP/ADP-regulated potassium channel (Katp, encoded by genes KCNJ11 and ABCC8), plasma membrane depolarization, opening of a voltage-gated calcium channel, calcium influx, and transport and binding of insulin granules to the cell surface (53). The ATP/ADP ratio is in turn altered by UCP2, an integral mitochondrial membrane protein that permits protons to leak across the mitochondrial inner membrane, thus uncoupling of glucose oxidative metabolism from ATP production (57). By decreasing the amount of ATP generated from glucose, UCP2 expression negatively regulates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Over-expression of UCP2 in β-cells in vitro decreases glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (58), whereas targeted inactivation of the UCP2 gene in mice has the opposite effect (59). Importantly, heterozygosity for a null UCP2 allele produces an effect that is intermediate between those observed in wild-type and homozygous mice, indicating that even relatively small changes in UCP2 expression may have a substantial impact on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.
Glucose Homeostasis: The Central Nervous System
Levels of glucose in the blood are regulated by a complex interplay between the appearance of glucose from both intestinal absorption and hepatic production and its disappearance through insulin-dependent and insulin independent glucose uptake in a variety of tissues. After the overnight fast, glucose is largely produced by glycogen breakdown and gluconeogenesis. About 80% of this glucose released by liver is metabolized independent of insulin by brain and other insulin–independent tissues (gut, red cells). The medial hypothalamus, a major integrator of nutritional and hormonal signals, plays a pivotal role not only in the regulation of energy balance but also in the modulation of liver glucose output. Diminished responses of first-order neurons, such as those in the arcuate nucleus, may contribute to the pathogenesis of T2DM (60–62). The enzyme carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 (CPT1) regulates long-chain fatty acid (LCFA) entry into mitochondria, where they undergo β-oxidation. Obici et al (63) observed that the selective reduction of lipid oxidation in the hypothalamus by inhibiting or decreasing the activity of CPT1, substantially diminished food intake and endogenous glucose production. These results indicated that changes in the rate of lipid oxidation in selective hypothalamic neurons signaled nutrient availability to the hypothalamus, which in turn modulated the exogenous and endogenous inputs of nutrients into the circulation.
A recent study by Pocai et al (64) revealed an important role for circulating LCFA and insulin levels, and a sensing role of hypothalamic (arcuate nucleus) Katp channels. Insulin infused into the region of the arcuate nucleus potently reduced hepatic glucose production from the liver. This effect was mediated by changing the level of activity of the hepatic branch of the vagus nerve that provided the major neural input into the liver. Katp channel inhibitors infused into the arcuate nucleus completely blocked the effects of CNS-infused insulin to reduce hepatic glucose production. Consistent with these results, mice lacking the SUR1 (ABCC8) subunit of the Katp channel were resistant to the inhibitory action of insulin on gluconeogenesis. Thus, activation of hypothalamic Katp channels normally restrains hepatic gluconeogenesis. Alterations within this central nervous system/hepatic circuit may contribute to diabetic hyperglycaemia (64). Other peripheral signals to the hypothalamic centers include leptin and insulin (61).
Glucose Homeostasis: Liver
Glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis are the two known source of hepatic glucose production (HGP). HGP is controlled by the integrated metabolite fluxes to and from the liver, hormonal cues, and as reviewed above, neurotransmitter release. Fasting promotes glucose production through cAMP-dependent mechanisms, whereas feeding inhibits glucose production through insulin. In the absorptive state, insulin silences hepatic PGC-1α transcription, and suppresses gluconoegenic enzymes PEPCK and G6Pase through the insulin signaling pathway (IRS2-Akt-mediated phosphorylation, 65). Glucagon opposes these actions by stimulating the transcription of gluconeogenic genes via the cyclic AMP-inducible factor CREB (cAMP response element–binding protein), thus increasing HGP. Recent findings (66–69) have begun to elucidate the role of additional hormone-regulated transcription factors that control gluconeogenesis. LKB1, a tumor-suppressor gene which encodes a protein-threonine kinase, phosphorylates and activates AMPK (adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase) and SIK2 (Salt-inducible kinase) in liver (67). The deletion of LKB1 in the liver of adult mice resulted in a nearly complete loss of AMPK activity and hyperglycemia with increased gluconeogenic and lipogenic gene expression. LKB1 acts through TORC2 (transducer of regulated CREB activity 2), a transcriptional coactivator of CREB which in turn acts on PGC-1α to increase gluconeogenesis. Downregulation of TORC2 reduced PGC-1α expression and normalized blood glucose levels in mice with liver specific LKB1 inactivation, indicating that TORC2 is a critical target of LKB1/AMPK signaling (67).
The β-Cell and Type 2 Diabetes
Impairment of insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cell is also a major component of T2DM pathogenesis. Analysis of mutations involved in six different maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) genes have revealed the important role of transcription factors in the insulin secretion. In a recent gene expression analysis of pancreatic islets isolated from T2DM and NGT individuals, Gunton et al (70) found a 90% decrease of the transcription factor, arylhydrocarbon nuclear receptor translocator (ARNT) in T2DM islets compared with nondiabetic individuals. Mice lacking ARNT in β-cells exhibited abnormal glucose tolerance, impaired insulin secretion and changes in islet gene expression similar to human T2DM (70). ARNT and its partner proteins are members of the basic helix-loop-helix Per/AhR/ARNT/Sim (bHLH-PAS) family of transcription factors. ARNT interacting partners include HIF1α, HIF2α and AhR, which together regulate the transcription of genes required for optimal glucose-responsive insulin secretion by β-cells. ARNT-HIF dimers may directly regulate the expression of several glycolytic enzymes. Oxygen and NO may also regulate insulin secretion through this ARNT-related pathway. ARNT is an obligate partner of several transcription factors involved in the response to toxins and hypoxic stress, and may integrate the genetic and environmental insults leading to T2DM pathogenesis (71).
Many mechanisms contributing to T2DM may trigger β-cell apoptosis and reduced β-cell mass or ability to compensate for insulin resistance (72). Mechanisms include endoplasmic reticulum stress (44), chronic hyperglycemia (glucotoxicity, 73,74), chronic hyperlipidemia (lipotoxicity) (75;76), oxidative stress (77), and inflammatory cytokines (78). Decreased IRS-2 expression, an essential β-cell growth factor, may lead to spontaneous β-cell apoptosis (79). Because several mechanisms relevant to pathogenesis of T2DM may increase IRS-2 serine/threonine phosphorylation (80,81) with resultant IRS-2 ubiqutination and proteosomal degradation, defects in insulin signaling and insulin secretion may be coupled.
Multiple pathways may lead to the T2DM phenotype. This review of the pathophysiology has covered only a fraction of the genes and pathways that may be implicated in T2DM pathogenesis, and that may harbor genetic variants. Based on the intertwined and complex physiologic pathway, a complicated genetic picture can be well anticipated. Indeed, such a picture is now emerging and is reviewed below.
The Quest for T2DM Susceptibility Loci: A Linkage Approach
As we reviewed above, decades of careful research have failed to clarify a unified model of the pathogenesis of T2DM. hence, using pathophysiology to predict susceptibility loci is difficult. The complex genetic pattern of T2DM, including the variable age of onset, reduced penetrance (not everyone with the genes will get T2DM), locus and allelic heterogeneity, and the likelihood of phenocopies (multiple different genetic causes and nongenetic causes), as well as the likelihood that many genes interacting with the environment contribute to T2DM have conspired to confound the search for T2DM susceptibility loci. Thus, T2DM remains as geneticist’s “Gordian knot”.
Two broad approaches have been used to define the genetic predisposition of T2DM. First, molecular events in diabetes pathogenesis have been examined directly by testing the role of sequence variants of specific candidate genes. The candidate gene approach focuses on the search for an association between T2DM and sequence variants in or near biologically defined candidate genes which have been chosen based on their known physiological function. The importance of these variants or other nearby variants is tested by comparing the frequency in T2DM subjects and control individuals. Despite of the apparent simplicity of study design and power of the study, candidate gene studies are necessarily limited to the investigation of known genes that are already considered important in glucose homeostasis. Our partial knowledge of the mechanisms contributing to T2DM and the complicated pathways involved in those known mechanisms make the candidate gene approach even more daunting. Although the wealth of information on pathways involved in T2DM pathophysiology is accumulating, and new bioinformatics approaches may guide the selection of potential susceptibility genes, novel genes and pathways cannot be identified by this approach.
To overcome the shortcomings of the candidate gene studies, investigators have applied a genome-wide linkage scan strategy in which regularly spaced markers are traced in families and sibling pairs for segregation with T2DM. No prior knowledge of gene or gene effects is necessary, but the genetic locus must have sufficient impact on the disease susceptibility to be detectable. The susceptibility locus is first localized to a chromosomal region. The specific gene and sequence variant are then identified within this region by a positional candidate gene approach in which genes are selected within the region for a physiologic impact. Alternatively, an unbiased approach of testing a dense map of markers in cases and controls across the region of linkage may be used. Most recently, technological advances have made a new approach possible which combines the power to detect small effects that characterizes candidate gene studies with the unbiased approach of the linkage study. This approach, known as the genome-wide association, has been applied in a limited fashion. For example, a recent study (82) identified a variant in the insulin induced gene 2 (INSIG2) that was associated with obesity in children and adults in several populations using the genome-wide association approach.
Over 27 genome wide linkage scans have been published in multiple ethnic groups including Mexican-American, Caucasian, Native American, Chinese, Japanese, Indian and African based populations, and in both founder and out-bred populations. Family configurations have included extended pedigrees, nuclear families, and simple affected (diabetic) sib pairs, and both definitions of “affected” and the analytical approaches have varied. Other scans have examined intermediate traits related to T2DM. The scans and best replicated regions are summarized in Table 1. Despite such differences, at least 8 susceptibility regions show at least some evidence for replication in our opinions and appear likely to harbor one or more susceptibility genes. Many other regions with some evidence of linkage can be defined (see Table 1), with much of the genome potentially identified. In consideration of brevity, we restrict our review to those regions with the best evidence for replication.
Table 1. Summary of published Genome-wide Scans for T2DM.
The table summarizes published genome wide scans for T2DM or related traits that are at least 10cM density. Replicated regions are marked by red color. Regions are selected for reported LOD score of at least 2.0 or equivalent, some regions represent subset analysis or below this threshold but replicate other findings. Locations are presented according to current Marshfield Linkage Map, based on most significant marker or region.
| Study | Population | Size and type | Suggestive linkage (LOD>2 or equivalent) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hanis (1996) | Mexican American | 330 affected sib pairs | 2q(260cM);15(45cM) |
| Mahtani (1996) | Botanian Finn | 26 extended families | 12q(140cM) |
| Hanson (1998) | Pima Indian | 264 nuclear families | 11q(139cM);1q(175–200cM);6(130cM) |
| Duggirala (1999) | Mexican American | 32 extended families | 10q(150cM);3p(70cM);4q(170cM);9p(14cM) |
| Elbein (1999) | US Caucasian | 42 extended families | 1q(165.62–170.84cM); 2q(245.4cM); 18p(0cM) |
| Ghosh (1999, 2000) | Finnish Caucasian (FUSION I) | 477 families (716 affected sib pairs) | 20p(20cM); 20q(60–85cM); 11q(85cM) |
| Ehm (2000) | US Caucasian | 77 Caucasian families | 5(78cM); 12(94cM); X(68.74cM) : for Caucasian |
| [GENNID] | African American | 65 African-American families | 10p(28cM) : for African American |
| Mexican American | 53 Mexican American families | 3p(58cM) : for Mexican American | |
| Vionnet (2000) | French Caucasian | 143 families | 1q21–q24(169.68cM); 3q(207.73cM) |
| Permutt (2001) | Ashkenazi Caucasian | 267 families | 4q(178cM);20q(50–63cM) |
| Parker (2001) | Finnish Swedish Caucasian | 353 families | 18p11(18–30cM) |
| Wiltshire (2001) | UK Caucasian | 573 families (743 sib pairs) | 1q21(181.49–191.52cM); 8p(33–44cM); 10(120cM) |
| Francke (2001) | Indo-Mauritian | 99 families | 1q44(318cM);3q22(165cM) |
| Luo (2001) | Chinese Han | 102 families | 20q (75cM);9p21.3(42.73cM); 9q21.13(70.33cM); 2q36.1(221.13cM) |
| Meigs (2002) | Framingham Caucasian | 330 families | 1q21(192.05cM) HbA1c level; 1q42.2(247.23) Mean glucose |
| Mori (2002) | Japanese | 224 affected sib pairs | 2q(194cM); 7p(7cM); 11p13(46cM); 15q13(42cM); 20q12(62cM) |
| Lindgren (2002) | Botnian Finn | 58 families | 9q21(66.32cM) |
| Bushfield (2002) | Indigenous Australian | 1 extended families(232 members) | 2q24(171.04cM); 8p22(31.73cM); 3q27(224.88cM) |
| Hsueh (2003) | Amish Caucasian | lextended family (691 member) | 1q31(116cM); 1q21(166cM); 14q11(7cM) |
| Van Tilburg (2003) | Dutch Caucasian | 178 families | 12q12–q14(48–68cM);18p11(18–28cM) |
| Aulchenko (2003) | Dutch Caucasian | 1 extended pedigree (79 nuclear families) | 18p11(8cM) |
| Reynisdottir (2003) | Iceland Caucasian | 227 families | 5q34–q35.2(177.06cM) |
| Iwasaki (2003) | Japanese | 256 affected sib pairs | 15q(45.8cM); 21q(48cM); 9q(140cM) : in ordered subset analysis |
| Xiang (2004) | Chinese Han | 257 families | 1q21(192cM);6q21(129cM) |
| Ng (2004) | Chinese (Hong Kong) | 64 families (126 sibpairs) | 1q21–q25(173cM); 4q(135cM) |
| Silander (2004) | Finnish Caucasian (FUSION II) | 242 affected sib pairs | 6q16–q22(113.03cM);14q23(66.81cM) |
| Sale (2004) | African American | 247 families | 6q25.3(164.78cM) |
| Rotimi (2004) | West Africa | 343 sib pairs | 20q13.3(62–95cM); 19(43.4cM); 12q(131cM) |
| Nawata (2004) | Japanese | 102 affected sib pairs | 11p13–p12(99.01cM);6q15–q16(51.95cM) |
| Hunt (2005) | Mexican American (SAFDGS) | 39 extended families | 3p(102cM) |
| Zhao (2005) | Chinese Han | 34 Multiplex nuclear families | 1p34.2(73.21cM);1q24.3(188.85cM) |
Chromosome 2q
The first locus for T2DM was mapped by Hanis et. al. in 1996 (83) to the telomeric region of chromosome 2q (2q33–q37) in 330 Mexican American sib pairs and called NIDDM1. Further fine mapping placed NIDDM1 near D2S140 (263.6 cM; multipoint lod score=4.03) with a 1-lod support interval from 257 to 269 cM, a 12-cM region that included marker D2S125. In subsequent studies, Cox and colleagues (84) used a two–locus conditional search strategy to show that NIDDM1 interacted with a chromosome 15 locus near CYP19, with an increase in the evidence for linkage from a logarithm of odds ratio of linkage to chance segregation (LOD) of 1.3 to 4.0 when NIDDM1 was taken into account. Similarly, evidence for linkage at NIDDM1 increased from 4.03 to 7.28 by conditioning on chromosome 15 linkage and decreased the 1-lod support interval (the size of the probable region harboring the susceptibility gene) from 12 cM to 7 cM (from 257–269 cM to 259–266 cM). Studies to identify a susceptibility gene in this region (calpain 10) are reviewed below. Other studies, including those from our laboratory (85) and the original Mexican American linkage study (83), have found suggestive evidence for linkage of T2DM to chromosome 2q in a second, more centromeric region from the CAPN10 gene. Other studies with some evidence for linkage have included Han Chinese (86) at marker D2S126 (221 cM), Japanese families selected for a BMI< 30 kg/m2 at 2q34 (223 cM) (87), and indigenous Australian families at 2q24.3 (177 cM; LOD score 3.9, 88). The gene or geness responsible for these observations are unknown.
Chromosome 20
Chromosome 20 was among the first regions with evidence for linkage in multiple studies (89–91). A large genome scan in 716 affected sib pairs from 477 Finnish families (The Finland–U.S. Investigation of Non-Insulin- Dependent Diabetes Mellitus Genetics or FUSION study) provided considerable additional evidence (92), and subsequent studies have added to the replication in Ashkenazy Jewish families (93) and in African sib pairs (94). In the large FUSION study, the evidence for linkage was observed on both the long and short arms, with multipoint lod scores of 3.08 on 20p (19.5cM) and 2.06 on 20q (57cM). Further high resolution mapping and conditioning on a chromosome 2p locus (8.5cM) provided further support for a locus on 20q at 69 cM (lod 5.50, 95). Linkage in the 472 sib pairs of Ashkenazy Jewish descent was similarly in the region form 51 cM to 62 cM, with a much weaker signal on 20p (2 cM, 93). A genome wide scan on Han Chinse families also found evidence for linkage near marker D20S196 on 20q in the subset of families with low BMI (86), and a similar subset analysis in Japanese families with BMI <30kg/cm2 provided additional evidence for T2DM linkage at 20q12–q13 (D20S119 at 61.77 cM; MLS 2.32, 87). In 343 sibling pairs from West Africa, highly suggestive linkage was found at 96 cM (D20S171, lod 2.63) (94). At least two strong candidate genes (PTPN1 and HNF4A) show evidence for an association with T2DM, and are reviewed below. However, additional susceptibility genes seem likely to explain this well replicated linkage across a broad region of chromosome 20.
Chromosome12
A T2DM susceptibility loci on chromosome 12q near HNF1α was reported first by Mahtani et al (96) in a subset analysis of families from Western Finland that had the lowest mean insulin levels. In an extension of this initial study by using 32 additional families, for a total of 54 multiplex families, Lindgren et al replicated the initial findings at chromosome 12q24 (97), and support a locus on 12q near 130–150cM. In the West African study of affected sibling pairs, a T2DM susceptibility locus was also reported at 12q24 (D12S2070 at 125.31cM; LOD=1.92, 94), and Ehm et al reported a locus on chromosome 12q in the Caucasian subset of families collected under the American Diabetes Association’s Genetics of NIDDM (GENNID) study, albeit somewhat centromeric to the earlier findings at 95 cM (lod 2.81, 98). Other reports of linkage provide additional support, albeit many findings are to a more centromeric region on chromosome 12 (50–100cM, 89,99–102). These findings suggest substantial replication to chromosome 12, but the gene or genes responsible remain unknown and the actual number of loci is uncertain.
Chromosome 1q
The best replicated locus at 1q21–q23 was initially identified independently by our laboratory in North European Caucasians (85) and in Pima Indians with onset before age 25 years (103). Subsequent replications of this region included Amish (104), French (105), United Kingdom (106), US Caucasians (Framingham, 107), two Chinese populations (108,109) and Arkansas African-American families (unpublished). In contrast to chromosomes 20 and 12, the chromosome 1 linkage peaks overlap in a relatively narrow region extending from 165 cM to 200 cM (110). This well replicated region of T2DM linkage is characterized by an extraordinary gene density, including a plethora of strong candidate genes. We recently reported that this region encompasses at least two and possibly three linkage peaks (111). We have reported that two genes in this region, liver pyruvate kinase (PKLR, 112) and calsequestrin1 (CASQ1, 113), were associated with T2DM. Both have been observed in other populations (114), and support a model of multiple susceptibility loci accounting for the chromosome 1 linkage signal. Work is ongoing to identify additional susceptibility genes in this region as an international collaborative effort.
Chromosome 18p
A locus on 18p (0–20cM) is likewise now well replicated. This region was suggestive in a scan from our laboratory (85). A subgroup analysis of the 20% of the most obese subjects from a study of 480 Finnish-Swedish Caucasian affected sib-pairs showed linkage to 18p11 (lod= 3.82 at D18S976 – D18S391, 115). Two subsequent studies from the Netherlands also suggested a locus that interacted with obesity. Aulchenko et al (116) reported a lod score of 2.3 at marker D18S63. When association was tested, the most significant findings were for subjects with high BMI. In a study from van Tilburg and colleagues (117), the linkage was again for the 20% of the most obese pedigrees at 18p11, between markers D18S471 and D18S843. Hence, the putative T2DM susceptibility locus at 18p11 is replicating well, but may be of most importance in interaction with obesity.
Chromosomes 3q, 11q and 8p
Several other loci show reasonable evidence for replication, and many cross ethnic groups. A locus at 3q22–q27 near the adiponectin locus (165–220cM) has replicated well, and adiponectin itself may be partially responsible (88,105,118). A broad region of 11q has been implicated in several studies, and obesity also maps to this region (95,103,119,120). In Pima Indians, the strongest 11q linkage was for a bivariate trait of obesity (BMI) and T2DM (103). Finally, studies in British families, Utah families of European descent, and indigenous Australian populations suggest an 8th possible locus at 8p21–p23 (85,88,106). With the exception of adiponectin, genes accounting for these linkage signals have not been identified.
Established T2DM Susceptibility Genes
Genes Identified by Linkage Studies
Horikawa Y and colleagues (121) used a relatively sparse linkage disequilibrium map of SNPs in the region of linkage on chromosome 2q to identify 3 common intronic variants of a previously unknown gene. The gene, calpain 10 (CAPN10), belonged to the family of calcium-activated, non-lysosomal thiol proteinases. Both a single intronic variant (UCSNP-43: G to A) and a specific haplotype combination defined by three polymorphisms (UCSNP-43, -19, and -63) were associated with T2DM in Mexican Americans, with lesser evidence of an association in a Northern European population from the Botnia region of Finland (121). Surprisingly, individuals with a combination of two different haplotypes (121/112) were at the highest risk of T2DM. In further support of CAPN10 as a susceptibility gene, Baier and colleagues (122) showed altered gene transcription and reduced muscle mRNA levels in muscle biopsies from Pima Indians with T2DM. Recent studies provide further support for a role of CAPN10 in T2DM, even among European derived populations (123). SNP-44 (designated “CAPN10-g4841TtoC”; minor allele frequency 16%), located in intron 3 and 11 bp from SNP-43, was independently associated with T2DM in several populations, and was in linkage disequilibrium with the missense mutation Thr504Ala and two 5′-UTR variants (SNP-134 and SNP-135). An initial meta-analysis also supported an association with T2DM (124), but a subsequent meta-analysis of over 5000 cases and 5000 controls suggested an effect size that was clearly less than suggested in the first studies (125) and raised questions about the role in T2DM. Nonetheless, we and others have found support for a role of CAPN10 in the association with intermediate, quantitative traits (126;127). Furthermore, CAPN10 variants were valuable along with traditional risk factors in predicting the onset of T2DM in a prospective study of Botnian Finnish individuals (128).
Although initial studies of the HNF4α gene, an obvious candidate on chromosome 20, failed to find any association with T2DM (92), subsequent studies based on the discovery of an upstream, β-cell specific promoter and first exon prompted a reevaluation. Two studies found evidence for association with T2DM that could partially explain the linkage signal (129,130). HNF4A has a complex expression pattern, which includes elaborate alternative splicing, and is expressed in many tissues, including the liver and pancreas. Three of the isoforms are transcribed by an alternative P2 promoter, located ~46 kb upstream of the P1 promoter and the rest of the coding exons. Transcripts from both the P1 and P2 promoters have been detected in pancreatic β-cells, but the P2 promoter is suggested to be the primary transcription start site in these cells. In total, 4 SNPs flanking the P2 promoter were associated with T2DM in both populations. Subsequent replication has been inconsistent. Vaxillaire et al failed to replicate in a French case control study (131). Hansen and colleagues found only modest evidence for one of 4 SNPs originally reported (p=0.02, OR=1.15) in a large Danish study (132), and Weedon et al found a similar effect in a large British study (5256 subjects; p=0.02, OR=1.15, 133). Damcott et al reported replication in the Old Order Amish (134), and Muller and colleagues reported replication in Pima Indians with OR 1.3 (135). Winckler and colleagues, on the other hand, found no replication in 7883 Caucasians from several populations (136). Although these SNPs appear to have a role in T2DM susceptibility, the effect is likely much smaller than originally reported, and likely similar to that of CAPN10.
The PTPN1 gene (chromosome 20q13) codes for protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B), which negatively regulates insulin signaling by dephosphorylating the phosphotyrosine residues of the insulin receptor kinase activation domain. Multiple noncoding SNPs in the PTPN1 gene (PTP1B) on chromosome 20q13 were recently implicated in T2DM in Caucasian and Mexican-American populations (137,138). The association was observed between multiple SNPs and T2DM, with the most consistent evidence for association occurring with SNPs spanning the 3′ end of intron 1 of PTPN1 through intron 8 (p values ranging from 0.043 to 0.004 in one case-control set and 0.038–0.002 in a second case-control set). All of the associated SNPs were present in a single 100-kb haplotype block that encompassed the PTPN1 gene. Haplotype frequencies were significantly different between T2DM case and control subjects (p=0.0035–0.0056), with a single common haplotype (36%) contributing strongly to the evidence for association, with OR 1.3. Furthermore, the same haplotypes were associated with glucose homeostasis measures in 811 Hispanic subjects (138). However, Florez et al failed to replicate the findings in a large Caucasian study (139). Further study is needed to determine the role of the strong candidate in a region of replicated linkage.
The search for diabetes susceptibility genes on most other chromosomes is ongoing. On chromosome 1, we initially described an association of polymorphisms of the liver pyruvate kinase gene with T2DM (112); subsequent preliminary reports have confirmed that association in Older Order Amish (140) and in other populations with chromosome 1 linkage (141). The region has extended linkage disequilibrium, such that several potential candidate genes are included within the two associated haplotypes. Work is ongoing in our laboratory and by others to identify the responsible variants. Closer to the most prominent chromosome 1 linkage peak, we and Fu et al independently showed an association of noncoding variants of calsequestrin gene (CASQ1) with T2DM in populations of European ancestry (113,114). The effect size is likely similar to that of CAPN10 or HNF4A. The role of this muscle gene, which is not an obvious candidate for T2DM, must await replication in other populations, however. Adiponectin is a strong candidate for T2DM given the clear role of plasma adiponectin levels in insulin sensitivity and the fall in adiponectin levels with obesity and T2DM. Adiponectin maps to the region of replicated linkage on chromosome 3q. A very large number of studies have examined adiponectin variants with metabolic traits, T2DM, and risk of conversion of impaired glucose tolerance to T2DM. Multiple studies found evidence that promoter variants in the APM1 gene were associated with T2DM in French and Swedish Caucasian and Japanese populations, and some data support a role of the APM1 locus in controlling adiponectin levels (142). However, APM1 variants did not appear to account for the 3q27 linkage in French families (142). Zacharova and colleagues showed that APM1 variation at positions 45 (G allele) in exon 2 and 276 in intron 2 (T allele) were associated with a 4.5 fold increased risk of converting from impaired glucose tolerance to T2DM in the STOP-NIDDM trial (143). On the other hand, no association was observed in Pima Indians (144). Larger studies are needed to determine the magnitude of risk imparted by APM1 variation.
Grant and colleagues (145) searched for a T2DM susceptibility gene under the suggestive linkage peak on chromosome 10q in an Icelandic population. They identified a 6 allele simple tandem repeat (STR) polymorphism in intron 3 of the transcription factor 7 like 2 gene (TCF7L2, formerly TCF4). Impressive associations were found in a Danish population and a United States Caucasian population, with a relative risk of 1.45 for heterozygotes and 2.41 in homozygotes. Although the exact role of TCF7L2 is unknown, it appears to act through the Wnt pathway to regulate proglucagon gene expression in enteroendocrine cells. The authors calculated a relatively high 27% population attributable risk (the proportion of T2DM that would not be present if the gene could be removed from the population). Two additional noncoding SNPs were closely correlated with the simple tandem repeat composite risk allele. Additional replication is needed to determine the real role of this novel gene.
Despite initial identification through a linkage signal, which would be expected to select relatively strong effects, each of these variants reviewed above has only modest individual effect (Odds Ratio, OR<1.4). Indeed, each with further study has shown much smaller effect than in the initial report – a phenomenon named the “winner’s curse”. Available data suggest that 1) the effects of individual variants are likely small; 2) multiple variants probably contribute to replicated linkage signals, as we have demonstrated on chromosome 1q; and 3) most variants are noncoding and regulatory rather than altering protein structure. We predict that each linkage region will in fact harbor multiple disease genes of small effect, and that no single variant will explain the linkage peak.
Genes Discovered by the Candidate Gene Approach
Extensive studies have been conducted of genes identified through physiologic pathways. Consistent with the very large numbers of studies, many have shown modest associations in single populations, but these associations have not yet been replicated. We make no attempt to provide a comprehensive review of the hundreds of genes examined by investigators around the world, and instead focus on genes for which reasonable replication has been achieved already. In each case, like those genes identified through linkage, the effect of these variants is relatively small, with OR<1.4 and in most cases approaching 1.2 or less. Perhaps as a bias of candidate gene studies, these variants are more often coding.
The peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a member of nuclear hormone receptor superfamily of transcription factors, and the target of the widely used class of insulin sensitizers, the thiazolidinediones. Multiple studies have examined a common amino acid change in the PPARγ2 isoform in which alanine is substituted for proline at position 12 (P12A). Although smaller studies provided inconsistent results, larger studies have shown a consistently protective effect of the rare, alanine allele (A/A) when compared with the common proline allele. Hence, the common P12 allele consistently increases T2DM risk by an OR of 1.2–1.3 in cross sectional studies (146). Furthermore, in the Nurses Health Study, the OR of carrying the Ala12 allele was 0.72, again suggesting a protective role (147). Several, but not all studies suggest that the rare “A” allele protects against insulin resistance and obesity, but the association with obesity has been inconsistent. In studies of families from Utah, we found an association with several “metabolic syndrome” traits, including BMI, serum total cholesterol levels, triglyceride levels, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and glucose concentrations. Gene-environment interactions have been suggested, and may explain the many inconsistent results. Because the common allele is also the risk allele for T2DM, and this allele has a frequency of at least 75% in most populations, the population attributable risk is again extremely high at 25%. Hence, the small individual effect of this variant translates into a large effect in the context of the population.
The β-cell potassium channel comprises two subunits, the potassium channel encoded by the gene KCNJ11, and the regulatory subunit (SUR1 encoded by ABCC8) that binds sulfonylureas and ATP. Variants in both subunits have been associated with T2DM. Two variants in ABCC8 were initially associated in smaller studies (148–150), and larger subsequent studies appeared to confirm the association (151,152). Other studies have not confirmed the association, however (153,154). We (155) and others (156) have shown altered insulin secretion associated with these variants. The adjacent KCNJ11 gene was initially noted to have multiple nonsynonymous coding variants (157), but none were associated with T2DM in this or other early studies (146,158). However, a coding glutamine to lysine at position 23 in the single exon (E23K) was shown to lower the sensitivity of the potassium channel to ATP and thus reduce insulin secretion in vitro (159). Gloyn et al subsequently showed a modest association of the E23K variant with T2DM in nearly 2500 British case-control subjects (153), and in a meta-analysis confirmed association with an OR of 1.16. More recently Florez and colleagues (154) thoroughly examined the two subunits (KCNJ11, ABCC8), and tested sufficient variants to completely tag all variation in this region. Again, the E23K variant was associated with T2DM in 3,413 subjects, and the association was confirmed in a meta-analysis that included over 5000 T2DM subjects and 4747 controls (p<10−5, OR 1.15). The E23K variant is in nearly complete linkage disequilibrium (completely correlated) with a Serine to Alanine change at position 1369 in exon 33 of the sulfonylurea receptor, and thus S1369A and E23K cannot be distinguished genetically. Nonetheless, E23K appears to have a role comparable to the PPARG P12A polymorphism. The appropriate genetic model is close to recessive, in which the relatively rare K23 homozygotes have the highest risk, but E23K heterozygotes are at some increased risk. Some (160) but not all (161) studies have found an effect of the K allele on insulin secretion.
Other variants in candidate genes have been more difficult to establish. The insulin gene variable tandem repeat polymorphism, which has clearly been associated with type 1 diabetes, and been controversial for over 20 years in T2DM (162). Whereas considerable evidence supports an association with obesity and birth weight (163–165), the association with T2DM is inconsistent (165–167). Similarly, both physiologic and genetic data are inconsistent for the glycine to arginine (G972R) variant of the insulin receptor substrate 1(IRS1) gene (168,169), now more correctly referred to as G971R. Despite evidence that this variant alters insulin action on IRS1 (169), the association with T2DM has been inconsistently replicated. Two recent large studies have revisited this variant. Zeggini and colleagues (170) examined 971 cases and 1257 controls from the United Kingdom, and found no association. However, a meta-analysis of 31 studies that included 5104 cases and 7,418 controls showed a modest association (p=0.025) with an OR of 1.15, suggesting that the effect size was similar to or smaller than that of KCNJ11 and PPARG. Florez et al (171) three large Caucasian samples with 9000 total individuals, including 4279 cases and 3532 controls, and found no evidence for an association with T2DM. If the IRS1 G972R (G971R) variant has any role in T2DM, clearly the role is quite small and of minimal clinical significance. Similarly, the association of a glycine to serine variant at position 482 of the PGC1α?gene has been reported by several groups, but not yet well replicated. PGC1α??as reviewed above, plays key roles in liver gluconeogenesis and was implicated in array studies of diabetic and control muscle. Positive associations were reported in JapaneseT2DM (172) and Danish cases and controls (173), and subsequently some replication was seen in populations from India (174) and Korea (175). Other associations were reported with insulin resistance (176) elevated glucose in nondiabetic offspring of diabetic parents (177), and reduced insulin secretion (178), but not with metabolic syndrome (179). Additional studies are required to determine the real role of this variant in diabetes susceptibility.
Variants in the gene ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase phosphodiesterase 1 (ENPP1), also known as plasma cell glycoprotein 1, were shown recently to be associated with both childhood and adult obesity in a French population. A moderate excess of the risk haplotype was also seen in adults with T2DM compared with controls (10.7% vs 7.1%, OR 1.44), and the association was replicated in an Austrian cohort with similar frequencies. A Mantel-Haenszel analysis of 2,569 European subjects supported the association, with OR 1.56 and p=0.00002 (180). The nonsynonymous variant lysine 212 to glutamine (K121Q) has been best studied, and also shown to be associated with obesity but not diabetes in Caucasian and African American subjects ascertained from the New York Cancer Project (181). Other investigators found an association of K121Q with earlier T2DM onset and coronary disease among T2DM patients (182). The association of K121Q with T2DM was replicated in three relatively small populations, two of South Asian ancestry and one Caucasian (183). Although the K121Q variant appears to associate with T2DM and obesity, additional work is needed to determine the magnitude of the risk, the populations affected, and to confirm a role comparable to KCNJ11 or PPARG.
Conclusions: Placing Genetic Susceptibility in Context
In this review, we have restricted discussion to those genes with the best evidence for a role in T2DM, and have not considered a multitude of other associations, many reported by our laboratory and others (151), which suggest that the eventual genetic landscape of T2DM will integrate a large number of genes, many with multiple variants. The completed work and the few susceptibility genes that are now well validated suggest that these susceptibility variants will have small effects, most with odds ratios below 1.4 and likely below 1.2. As these susceptibility genes inhabit different pathways in the complex physiologic network that causes T2DM, we expect many of the variants will interact. We propose that much as very small changes in gene expression in the oxidative phosphorylation pathways appear to result in decreased oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial function (52), multiple defects of individually small effect will combine in a single pathway to have large physiologic effect. We propose that broad linkage peaks, as found on chromosome 20 and chromosome 1q, in fact represent multiple genes, many in either the same pathway or in interacting pathways. Sorting out these complex gene-gene interactions will require sizeable populations, however.
Although we have focused on gene variation as the cause of T2DM, the role of environment in the current diabetes pandemic is undeniable. Different environmental stresses, population differences in activity, and different diets clearly cause some genes to manifest as a disease phenotype. For example, fish oil may stimulate PPARγ in much the same fashion as the thiazolidinedione class of drugs; studies of the interaction of the P12A variant with dietary composition have not been performed. The spectacular rise in rates of diabetes among Pima Indians and other populations as they adopt Western diets and life styles dramatically demonstrates the key role of environment. Consequently, the effect of a common gene variant between populations that have very different diets and exercise habits might be expected to be totally different, thus explaining some instances of lack of replication.
In a recent study, Ioannidis et al (184), examined the genetic effects for 43 validated gene-disease associations across 697 studies of varied ancestry. They argued that proposed racial differences in genetic risk should be scrutinized cautiously, and that genetic effects are usually consistent across human populations. Instead, they argued, small sample sizes, flawed study designs, or other biases may be more common reasons than true ‘racial’ heterogeneity for the observed discrepancies. Nonetheless, marked differences in allele frequencies are clearly evident in known susceptibility genes, and ethnic differences in disease prevalence are also common. We predict that ethnic “specific” risk factors will indeed be present, although differences in the degree of risk, allele frequency, and gene-gene or gene-environment interactions. Clearly much remains to be learned regarding these issues for complex disease. Our tacit application of models derived from our understanding of monogenic disease may retard our understanding of common complex diseases such as T2DM.
Whereas the focus on adult diseases such as T2DM is on the role of post-natal or post-pubertal environment, considerable data that cannot be reviewed here suggest a role for genes that control fetal growth and intrauterine environment in T2DM. For example, Beck-Nielsen (185) demonstrated in a group of middle aged, monozygotic twins that the twin with T2DM was consistently the lighter of the pair at birth. Hence, even in genetically identical individuals, the intrauterine environment may influence fetal growth differentially with implications for subsequent adult metabolic health. When considered in the context of numerous studies of birth weight and the risk for diabetes and metabolic syndrome, this study suggests that gene-environment interactions may need to consider intrauterine environment in addition to the external environment.
With the human genome sequence completed in 2003, new data are rapidly expanding on the noncoding aspects of our genome. T2DM and most other complex diseases appear to be caused primarily by noncoding rather than coding variants. Thus, KCNJ11, PPARG, IRS1, and ENPP1 coding variants discussed above are likely the exception, and their prominence reflecting a strong publication bias to report and validate changes in protein structure while ignoring noncoding variants as silent. This bias is likely unfounded. Noncoding SNPs or microsatellites are clearly the only explanation for a multitude of complex disease genes, including HNF4A, PTPN1, CASQ1, PKLR, and CAPN10 reviewed above among many others. Whereas not long ago such findings were viewed as implausible, recent studies (186–188) have revolutionized our understanding of the genome, and suggest that much noncoding DNA is indeed functional as long range enhancer elements controlling gene transcription, noncoding RNA that may have regulatory functions, and small RNA species that have widespread regulatory properties and are often derived from intronic sequences of coding genes. Furthermore, over 70% of genes likely undergo alternative splicing and generate multiple protein forms (186). The balance between those splice forms often correlates with noncoding SNPs that may have profound effects on phenotype. Given the likely extensive role of intronic and intergenic DNA in determining phenotype, a major role of sequence variants in noncoding regions in T2DM pathogenesis should be anticipated. Ignoring this wealth of knowledge will impede our continued quest to understand the role of genes in T2DM susceptibility. Our increased understanding of such phenomena will open new doors to understanding how common variants can alter disease susceptibility, and will be essential in understanding the physiologic importance of the genetic associations that we uncover.
Clinical Implications
The molecular genetic definition of T2DM pathophysiology will certainly satisfy our intellectual curiosity about this common disease, but will it impact health care? Our knowledge to predict T2DM is currently limited. Pharmacological intervention rather than prevention remains the primary approach to this disease. In a recent study, Lyssenko et.al.(128) combined variants in only two genes, PPARG and CAPN10, both reviewed above, with traditional risk factors. These investigators achieved a remarkable 21.2 –fold increased risk (estimated by hazard ratio-HR) in obese carriers of the PPARG P12/P12 genotype and CAPN10 SNP43/44 GG/TT genotypes along with elevated fasting plasma glucose (FPG). This study is a landmark in combining individually weak genetic risk factors with traditional risk factors to improve the prediction of future T2DM. Although the combination of genetic risk factors in this model has been challenged (189), the methods of Lyssenko and colleagues model the was in which multiple small genetic risk factors can be combined to predict risk. Future predictive testing might include testing a battery of common genetic variants, followed by computational joint assessment of traditional environmental and lifestyle risk factors, which may assist physicians and patient in choosing a preventive strategy. If personalized medicine is to be realized in the future for complex diseases, such models will be required. The future challenges for the genetics of T2DM will include not only the cataloging of what can now be recognized as likely 100 or more genetic susceptibility variants, but more importantly the synthesis of this catalog with environmental risk factors, gene-gene, and gene-environment interactions. The utility of genetic approaches will depend on a holistic understanding of the interactions of among genetic variants, and between genetic variants and the environmental, lifestyle factors, treatments, and perhaps even intrauterine environment. This integrated approach must replace the current methods of using a reductionist approach to understand each component separately.
References
- 1.Roglic G, Unwin N, Bennett PH, Mathers C, Tuomilehto J, Nag S, Connolly V, King H. The burden of mortality attributable to diabetes: realistic estimates for the year 2000. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2130–2135. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.9.2130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047–1053. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smyth S, Heron A. Diabetes and obesity: the twin epidemics. NatMed. 2006;12:75–80. doi: 10.1038/nm0106-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yach D, Stuckler D, Brownell KD. Epidemiologic and economic consequences of the global epidemics of obesity and diabetes. NatMed. 2006;12:62–66. doi: 10.1038/nm0106-62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Diamond J. The double puzzle of diabetes. Nature. 2003;423:599–602. doi: 10.1038/423599a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Meigs JB, Cupples LA, Wilson PW. Parental transmission of type 2 diabetes: the Framingham Offspring Study. Diabetes. 2000;49:2201–2207. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Barnett AH, Eff C, Leslie RD, Pyke DA. Diabetes in identical twins. A study of 200 pairs Diabetologia. 1981;20:87–93. doi: 10.1007/BF00262007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Newman B, Selby JV, King MC, Slemenda C, Fabsitz R, Friedman GD. Concordance for type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in male twins. Diabetologia. 1987;30:763–768. doi: 10.1007/BF00275741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Poulsen P, Kyvik KO, Vaag A, Beck-Nielsen H. Heritability of type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and abnormal glucose tolerance--a population-based twin study. Diabetologia. 1999;42:139–145. doi: 10.1007/s001250051131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Medici F, Hawa M, Ianari A, Pyke DA, Leslie RD. Concordance rate for type II diabetes mellitus in monozygotic twins: actuarial analysis. Diabetologia. 1999;42:146–150. doi: 10.1007/s001250051132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vaag A, Henriksen JE, Madsbad S, Holm N, Beck-Nielsen H. Insulin secretion, insulin action, and hepatic glucose production in identical twins discordant for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. JClinInvest. 1995;95:690–698. doi: 10.1172/JCI117715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Elbein SC, Hasstedt SJ, Wegner K, Kahn SE. Heritability of pancreatic beta-cell function among nondiabetic members of Caucasian familial type 2 diabetic kindreds. JClinEndocrinolMetab. 1999;84:1398–1403. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.4.5604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Elbein SC, Wegner K, Kahn SE. Reduced beta-cell compensation to the insulin resistance associated with obesity in members of caucasian familial type 2 diabetic kindreds. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:221–227. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.2.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gerich JE. The genetic basis of type 2 diabetes mellitus: impaired insulin secretion versus impaired insulin sensitivity. EndocrRev. 1998;19:491–503. doi: 10.1210/edrv.19.4.0338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.DeFronzo RA, Bonadonna RC, Ferrannini E. Pathogenesis of NIDDM. A balanced overview Diabetes Care. 1992;15:318–368. doi: 10.2337/diacare.15.3.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stumvoll M, Goldstein BJ, van Haeften TW. Type 2 diabetes: principles of pathogenesis and therapy. Lancet. 2005;365:1333–1346. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61032-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Weyer C, Bogardus C, Mott DM, Pratley RE. The natural history of insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J ClinInvest. 1999;104:787–794. doi: 10.1172/JCI7231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ferrannini E. Insulin resistance versus insulin deficiency in non-insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus: problems and prospects. EndocrRev. 1998;19:477–490. doi: 10.1210/edrv.19.4.0336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kahn SE. The relative contributions of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction to the pathophysiology of Type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2003;46:3–19. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-1009-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Minokoshi Y, Kahn CR, Kahn BB. Tissue-specific ablation of the GLUT4 glucose transporter or the insulin receptor challenges assumptions about insulin action and glucose homeostasis. JBiolChem. 2003;278:33609–33612. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R300019200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fisher SJ, Kahn CR. Insulin signaling is required for insulin’s direct and indirect action on hepatic glucose production. JClinInvest. 2003;111:463–468. doi: 10.1172/JCI16426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Michael MD, Kulkarni RN, Postic C, Previs SF, Shulman GI, Magnuson MA, Kahn CR. Loss of insulin signaling in hepatocytes leads to severe insulin resistance and progressive hepatic dysfunction. MolCell. 2000;6:87–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mauvais-Jarvis F, Kulkarni RN, Kahn CR. Knockout models are useful tools to dissect the pathophysiology and genetics of insulin resistance. ClinEndocrinol(Oxf) 2002;57:1–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2002.01563.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Baudry A, Leroux L, Jackerott M, Joshi RL. Genetic manipulation of insulin signaling, action and secretion in mice. Insights into glucose homeostasis and pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. EMBO Rep. 2002;3:323–328. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Accili D. Lilly lecture 2003: the struggle for mastery in insulin action: from triumvirate to republic. Diabetes. 2004;53:1633–1642. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.7.1633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shepherd PR, Kahn BB. Glucose transporters and insulin action--implications for insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. NEnglJMed. 1999;341:248–257. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907223410406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Abel ED, Peroni O, Kim JK, Kim Y-B, Boss O, Hadro E, Minnemann T, Shulman GI, Kahn BB. Adipose-selective targeting of the GLUT4 gene impairs insulin action in muscle and liver. Nature. 2001;409:729–733. doi: 10.1038/35055575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zisman A, Peroni OD, Abel ED, Michael MD, Mauvais-Jarvis F, Lowell BB, Wojtaszewski JF, Hirshman MF, Virkamaki A, Goodyear LJ, Kahn CR, Kahn BB. Targeted disruption of the glucose transporter 4 selectively in muscle causes insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. NatMed. 2000;6:924–928. doi: 10.1038/78693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yang Q, Graham TE, Mody N, Preitner F, Peroni OD, Zabolotny JM, Kotani K, Quadro L, Kahn BB. Serum retinol binding protein 4 contributes to insulin resistance in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2005;436:356–362. doi: 10.1038/nature03711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gimeno RE, Klaman LD. Adipose tissue as an active endocrine organ: recent advances. CurrOpinPharmacol. 2005;5:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2005.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lazar MA. How obesity causes diabetes: not a tall tale. Science. 2005;307:373–375. doi: 10.1126/science.1104342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wellen KE, Hotamisligil GS. Inflammation, stress, and diabetes. JClinInvest. 2005;115:1111–1119. doi: 10.1172/JCI25102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.de Luca C, Olefsky JM. Stressed out about obesity and insulin resistance. NatMed. 2006;12:41–42. doi: 10.1038/nm0106-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lazar MA. The humoral side of insulin resistance. NatMed. 2006;12:43–44. doi: 10.1038/nm0106-43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hotamisligil GS, Peraldi P, Budavari A, Ellis R, White MF, Spiegelman BM. IRS-1-mediated inhibition of insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity in TNF-alpha- and obesity-induced insulin resistance. Science. 1996;271:665–668. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5249.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aguirre V, Werner ED, Giraud J, Lee YH, Shoelson SE, White MF. Phosphorylation of Ser307 in insulin receptor substrate-1 blocks interactions with the insulin receptor and inhibits insulin action. JBiolChem. 2002;277:1531–1537. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101521200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Aguirre V, Uchida T, Yenush L, Davis R, White MF. The c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase promotes insulin resistance during association with insulin receptor substrate-1 and phosphorylation of Ser(307) JBiolChem. 2000;275:9047–9054. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.12.9047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Paz K, Hemi R, LeRoith D, Karasik A, Elhanany E, Kanety H, Zick Y. A molecular basis for insulin resistance. Elevated serine/threonine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and IRS-2 inhibits their binding to the juxtamembrane region of the insulin receptor and impairs their ability to undergo insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation. JBiolChem. 1997;272:29911–29918. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.47.29911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Weisberg SP, McCann D, Desai M, Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL, Ferrante AW., Jr Obesity is associated with macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue. JClinInvest. 2003;112:1796–1808. doi: 10.1172/JCI19246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Xu H, Barnes GT, Yang Q, Tan G, Yang D, Chou CJ, Sole J, Nichols A, Ross JS, Tartaglia LA, Chen H. Chronic inflammation in fat plays a crucial role in the development of obesity-related insulin resistance. JClinInvest. 2003;112:1821–1830. doi: 10.1172/JCI19451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ozawa K, Miyazaki M, Matsuhisa M, Takano K, Nakatani Y, Hatazaki M, Tamatani T, Yamagata K, Miyagawa J, Kitao Y, Hori O, Yamasaki Y, Ogawa S. The endoplasmic reticulum chaperone improves insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54:657–663. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.3.657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ozcan U, Cao Q, Yilmaz E, Lee AH, Iwakoshi NN, Ozdelen E, Tuncman G, Gorgun C, Glimcher LH, Hotamisligil GS. Endoplasmic reticulum stress links obesity, insulin action, and type 2 diabetes. Science. 2004;306:457–461. doi: 10.1126/science.1103160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nakatani Y, Kaneto H, Kawamori D, Yoshiuchi K, Hatazaki M, Matsuoka TA, Ozawa K, Ogawa S, Hori M, Yamasaki Y, Matsuhisa M. Involvement of endoplasmic reticulum stress in insulin resistance and diabetes. JBiol Chem. 2005;280:847–851. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411860200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Harding HP, Ron D. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the development of diabetes: a review. Diabetes. 2002;51(Suppl 3):S455–61. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.2007.s455. S455–S461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Arkan MC, Hevener AL, Greten FR, Maeda S, Li ZW, Long JM, Wynshaw-Boris A, Poli G, Olefsky J, Karin M. IKK-beta links inflammation to obesity-induced insulin resistance. NatMed. 2005;11:191–198. doi: 10.1038/nm1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cai D, Yuan M, Frantz DF, Melendez PA, Hansen L, Lee J, Shoelson SE. Local and systemic insulin resistance resulting from hepatic activation of IKK-beta and NF-kappaB. NatMed. 2005;11:183–190. doi: 10.1038/nm1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lin Y, Berg AH, Iyengar P, Lam TK, Giacca A, Combs TP, Rajala MW, Du X, Rollman B, Li W, Hawkins M, Barzilai N, Rhodes CJ, Fantus IG, Brownlee M, Scherer PE. The hyperglycemia-induced inflammatory response in adipocytes: the role of reactive oxygen species. JBiolChem. 2005;280:4617–4626. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411863200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Furukawa S, Fujita T, Shimabukuro M, Iwaki M, Yamada Y, Nakajima Y, Nakayama O, Makishima M, Matsuda M, Shimomura I. Increased oxidative stress in obesity and its impact on metabolic syndrome. JClinInvest. 2004;114:1752–1761. doi: 10.1172/JCI21625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Urakawa H, Katsuki A, Sumida Y, Gabazza EC, Murashima S, Morioka K, Maruyama N, Kitagawa N, Tanaka T, Hori Y, Nakatani K, Yano Y, Adachi Y. Oxidative stress is associated with adiposity and insulin resistance in men. J ClinEndocrinolMetab. 2003;88:4673–4676. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Houstis N, Rosen ED, Lander ES. Reactive oxygen species have a causal role in multiple forms of insulin resistance. Nature. 2006;440:944–948. doi: 10.1038/nature04634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Patti ME, Butte AJ, Crunkhorn S, Cusi K, Berria R, Kashyap S, Miyazaki Y, Kohane I, Costello M, Saccone R, Landaker EJ, Goldfine AB, Mun E, DeFronzo R, Finlayson J, Kahn CR, Mandarino LJ. Coordinated reduction of genes of oxidative metabolism in humans with insulin resistance and diabetes: Potential role of PGC1 and NRF1. Proc NatlAcadSciUSA. 2003;100:8466–8471. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1032913100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, Puigserver P, Carlsson E, Ridderstrale M, Laurila E, Houstis N, Daly MJ, Patterson N, Mesirov JP, Golub TR, Tamayo P, Spiegelman B, Lander ES, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D, Groop LC. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. NatGenet. 2003;34:267–273. doi: 10.1038/ng1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lowell BB, Shulman GI. Mitochondrial dysfunction and type 2 diabetes. Science. 2005;307:384–387. doi: 10.1126/science.1104343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Petersen KF, Dufour S, Befroy D, Garcia R, Shulman GI. Impaired mitochondrial activity in the insulin-resistant offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes. NEnglJMed. 2004;350:664–671. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Maechler P, Wollheim CB. Mitochondrial function in normal and diabetic beta-cells. Nature. 2001;414:807–812. doi: 10.1038/414807a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Morino K, Petersen KF, Dufour S, Befroy D, Frattini J, Shatzkes N, Neschen S, White MF, Bilz S, Sono S, Pypaert M, Shulman GI. Reduced mitochondrial density and increased IRS-1 serine phosphorylation in muscle of insulin-resistant offspring of type 2 diabetic parents. JClinInvest. 2005;115:3587–3593. doi: 10.1172/JCI25151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Krauss S, Zhang CY, Scorrano L, Dalgaard LT, St Pierre J, Grey ST, Lowell BB. Superoxide-mediated activation of uncoupling protein 2 causes pancreatic beta cell dysfunction. JClinInvest. 2003;112:1831–1842. doi: 10.1172/JCI19774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chan CB, De Leo D, Joseph JW, McQuaid TS, Ha XF, Xu F, Tsushima RG, Pennefather PS, Salapatek AM, Wheeler MB. Increased uncoupling protein-2 levels in beta-cells are associated with impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion: mechanism of action. Diabetes. 2001;50:1302–1310. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.6.1302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhang CY, Baffy G, Perret P, Krauss S, Peroni O, Grujic D, Hagen T, Vidal-Puig AJ, Boss O, Kim YB, Zheng XX, Wheeler MB, Shulman GI, Chan CB, Lowell BB. Uncoupling protein-2 negatively regulates insulin secretion and is a major link between obesity, beta cell dysfunction, and type 2 diabetes. Cell. 2001;105:745–755. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00378-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Porte D, Jr, Baskin DG, Schwartz MW. Insulin signaling in the central nervous system: a critical role in metabolic homeostasis and disease from C. elegans to humans. Diabetes. 2005;54:1264–1276. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.5.1264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schwartz MW, Porte D., Jr Diabetes, obesity, and the brain. Science. 2005;307:375–379. doi: 10.1126/science.1104344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Seeley RJ, Tschop M. How diabetes went to our heads. NatMed. 2006;12:47–49. doi: 10.1038/nm0106-47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Obici S, Feng Z, Arduini A, Conti R, Rossetti L. Inhibition of hypothalamic carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 decreases food intake and glucose production. NatMed. 2003;9:756–761. doi: 10.1038/nm873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pocai A, Lam TK, Gutierrez-Juarez R, Obici S, Schwartz GJ, Bryan J, Aguilar-Bryan L, Rossetti L. Hypothalamic K(ATP) channels control hepatic glucose production. Nature. 2005;434:1026–1031. doi: 10.1038/nature03439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wolfrum C, Asilmaz E, Luca E, Friedman JM, Stoffel M. Foxa2 regulates lipid metabolism and ketogenesis in the liver during fasting and in diabetes. Nature. 2004;432:1027–1032. doi: 10.1038/nature03047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Matsumoto M, Accili D. The tangled path to glucose production. NatMed. 2006;12:33–34. doi: 10.1038/nm0106-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Shaw RJ, Lamia KA, Vasquez D, Koo SH, Bardeesy N, Depinho RA, Montminy M, Cantley LC. The kinase LKB1 mediates glucose homeostasis in liver and therapeutic effects of metformin. Science. 2005;310:1642–1646. doi: 10.1126/science.1120781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Koo SH, Flechner L, Qi L, Zhang X, Screaton RA, Jeffries S, Hedrick S, Xu W, Boussouar F, Brindle P, Takemori H, Montminy M. The CREB coactivator TORC2 is a key regulator of fasting glucose metabolism. Nature. 2005;437:1109–1111. doi: 10.1038/nature03967. % 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zhou XY, Shibusawa N, Naik K, Porras D, Temple K, Ou H, Kaihara K, Roe MW, Brady MJ, Wondisford FE. Insulin regulation of hepatic gluconeogenesis through phosphorylation of CREB-binding protein. NatMed. 2004;10:633–637. doi: 10.1038/nm1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gunton JE, Kulkarni RN, Yim S, Okada T, Hawthorne WJ, Tseng YH, Roberson RS, Ricordi C, O’Connell PJ, Gonzalez FJ, Kahn CR. Loss of ARNT/HIF1beta mediates altered gene expression and pancreatic-islet dysfunction in human type 2 diabetes. Cell. 2005;122:337–349. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Czech MP. ARNT misbehavin’ in diabetic beta cells. NatMed. 2006;12:39–40. doi: 10.1038/nm0106-39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rhodes CJ. Type 2 diabetes-a matter of beta-cell life and death? Science. 2005;307:380–384. doi: 10.1126/science.1104345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Donath MY, Halban PA. Decreased beta-cell mass in diabetes: significance, mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Diabetologia. 2004;47:581–589. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1336-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lingohr MK, Buettner R, Rhodes CJ. Pancreatic beta-cell growth and survival--a role in obesity-linked type 2 diabetes? Trends MolMed. 2002;8:375–384. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4914(02)02377-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Unger RH, Zhou YT. Lipotoxicity of beta-cells in obesity and in other causes of fatty acid spillover. Diabetes. 2001;50 (Suppl 1):S118–S121. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.2007.s118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Poitout V, Robertson RP. Minireview: Secondary beta-cell failure in type 2 diabetes--a convergence of glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity. Endocrinology. 2002;143:339–342. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.2.8623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kaneto H, Nakatani Y, Kawamori D, Miyatsuka T, Matsuoka TA, Matsuhisa M, Yamasaki Y. Role of oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase in pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance. IntJBiochemCell Biol. 2006;38:782–793. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Donath MY, Storling J, Maedler K, Mandrup-Poulsen T. Inflammatory mediators and islet beta-cell failure: a link between type 1 and type 2 diabetes. JMolMed. 2003;81:455–470. doi: 10.1007/s00109-003-0450-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hennige AM, Burks DJ, Ozcan U, Kulkarni RN, Ye J, Park S, Schubert M, Fisher TL, Dow MA, Leshan R, Zakaria M, Mossa-Basha M, White MF. Upregulation of insulin receptor substrate-2 in pancreatic beta cells prevents diabetes. JClinInvest. 2003;112:1521–1532. doi: 10.1172/JCI18581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Werner ED, Lee J, Hansen L, Yuan M, Shoelson SE. Insulin resistance due to phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 at serine 302. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:35298–35305. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405203200. %20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.White MF. IRS proteins and the common path to diabetes. AmJPhysiol EndocrinolMetab. 2002;283:E413–E422. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00514.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Herbert A, Gerry NP, McQueen MB, Heid IM, Pfeufer A, Illig T, Wichmann HE, Meitinger T, Hunter D, Hu FB, Colditz G, Hinney A, Hebebrand J, Koberwitz K, Zhu X, Cooper R, Ardlie K, Lyon H, Hirschhorn JN, Laird NM, Lenburg ME, Lange C, Christman MF. A common genetic variant is associated with adult and childhood obesity. Science. 2006;312:279–283. doi: 10.1126/science.1124779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Hanis CL, Boerwinkle E, Chakraborty R, Ellsworth DL, Concannon P, Stirling B, Morrison VA, Wapelhorst B, Spielman RS, Gogolin-Ewens KJ, Shephard JM, Williams SR, Risch N, Hinds D, Iwasaki N, Ogata M, Ommoi Y, Petzold C, Rietzsch H, Schroeder H-E, Schulze J, Cox NJ, Menzel S, Boriraj VV, Chen X, Lim LR, Linder T, Mereu LE, Wang Y-Q, Xiang K, Yamagata K, Yang Y, Bell GI. A genome-wide search for human non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes genes reveals a major susceptibility locus on chromosome 2. NatGenet. 1996;13:161–166. doi: 10.1038/ng0696-161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Cox NJ, Frigge M, Nicolae DL, Concannon P, Hanis CL, Bell GI, Kong A. Loci on chromosomes 2 (NIDDM1) and 15 interact to increase susceptibility to diabetes in Mexican Americans. NatGenet. 1999;21:213–215. doi: 10.1038/6002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Elbein SC, Hoffman MD, Teng K, Leppert MF, Hasstedt SJ. A genome-wide search for type 2 diabetes susceptibility genes in Utah Caucasians. Diabetes. 1999;48:1175–1182. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.5.1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Luo TH, Zhao Y, Li G, Yuan WT, Zhao JJ, Chen JL, Huang W, Luo M. A genome-wide search for type II diabetes susceptibility genes in Chinese Hans. Diabetologia. 2001;44:501–506. doi: 10.1007/s001250051649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Mori Y, Otabe S, Dina C, Yasuda K, Populaire C, Lecoeur C, Vatin V, Durand E, Hara K, Okada T, Tobe K, Boutin P, Kadowaki T, Froguel P. Genome-wide search for type 2 diabetes in Japanese affected sib-pairs confirms susceptibility genes on 3q, 15q, and 20q and identifies two new candidate Loci on 7p and 11p. Diabetes. 2002;51:1247–1255. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.4.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Busfield F, Duffy DL, Kesting JB, Walker SM, Lovelock P, Good D, Tate H, Watego D, Marczak M, Hayman N, Shaw JT. A Genomewide Search for Type 2 Diabetes-Susceptibility Genes in Indigenous Australians. AmJHum Genet. 2002;70:349–357. doi: 10.1086/338626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bowden DW, Sale M, Howard TD, Qadri A, Spray BJ, Rothschild CB, Akots G, Rich SS, Freedman BI. Linkage of genetic markers on human chromosomes 20 and 12 to NIDDM in Caucasian sib pairs with a history of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 1997;46:882–886. doi: 10.2337/diab.46.5.882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hani e, Zouali H, Philippi A, Beaudoin JC, Vionnet N, Passa P, Demenais F, Froguel P. Indication for genetic linkage of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCK1) gene region on chromosome 20q to non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. 1996;22:451–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Zouali H, Hani EH, Philippi A, Vionnet N, Beckmann JS, Demenais F, Froguel P. A susceptibility locus for early-onset non-insulin dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus maps to chromosome 20q, proximal to the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene. Hum MolGenet. 1997;6:1401–1408. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.9.1401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Ghosh S, Watanabe RM, Hauser ER, Valle T, Magnuson VL, Erdos MR, Langefeld CD, Balow J, Jr, Ally DS, Kohtamaki K, Chines P, Birznieks G, Kaleta HS, Musick A, Te C, Tannenbaum J, Eldridge W, Shapiro S, Martin C, Witt A, So A, Chang J, Shurtleff B, Porter R, Boehnke M. Type 2 diabetes: evidence for linkage on chromosome 20 in 716 Finnish affected sib pairs. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA. 1999;96:2198–2203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Permutt MA, Wasson JC, Suarez BK, Lin J, Thomas J, Meyer J, Lewitzky S, Rennich JS, Parker A, Duprat L, Maruti S, Chayen S, Glaser B. A genome scan for type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci in a genetically isolated population. Diabetes. 2001;50:681–685. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.3.681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Rotimi CN, Chen G, Adeyemo AA, Furbert-Harris P, Guass D, Zhou J, Berg K, Adegoke O, Amoah A, Owusu S, Acheampong J, Agyenim-Boateng K, Eghan BA, Jr, Oli J, Okafor G, Ofoegbu E, Osotimehin B, Abbiyesuku F, Johnson T, Rufus T, Fasanmade O, Kittles R, Daniel H, Chen Y, Dunston G, Collins FS. A genome-wide search for type 2 diabetes susceptibility genes in West Africans: the Africa America Diabetes Mellitus (AADM) Study. Diabetes. 2004;53:838–841. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.3.838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Ghosh S, Watanabe RM, Valle TT, Hauser ER, Magnuson VL, Langefeld CD, Ally DS, Mohlke KL, Silander K, Kohtamaki K, Chines P, Balow JJ, Birznieks G, Chang J, Eldridge W, Erdos MR, Karanjawala ZE, Knapp JI, Kudelko K, Martin C, Morales-Mena A, Musick A, Musick T, Pfahl C, Porter R, Rayman JB, Rha D, Segal L, Shapiro S, Sharaf R, Shurtleff B, So A, Tannenbaum J, Te C, Tovar J, Unni A, Welch C, Whiten R, Witt A, Blaschak-Harvan J, Douglas JA, Duren WL, Epstein MP, Fingerlin TE, Kaleta HS, Lange EM, Li C, McEachin RC, Stringham HM, Trager E, White PP, Eriksson J, Toivanen L, Vidgren G, Nylund SJ, Tuomilehto-Wolf E, Ross EH, Demirchyan E, Hagopian WA, Buchanan TA, Tuomilehto J, Bergman RN, Collins FS, Boehnke M. The Finland-United States Investigation of Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus Genetics (FUSION) Study. I An Autosomal Genome Scan for Genes That Predispose to Type 2 Diabetes. AmJHumGenet. 2000;67:1174–1185. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Mahtani MM, Widen E, Lehto M, Thomas J, McCarthy M, Brayer J, Bryant B, Chan G, Daly M, Forsblom C, Kanninen T, Kirby A, Kruglyak L, Munnelly K, Parkkonen M, Reeve-Daly MP, Weaver A, Brettin T, Duyk G, Lander ES, Groop LC. Mapping of a gene for type 2 diabetes associated with an insulin secretion defect by a genome scan in Finnish families. NatGenet. 1996;14:90–94. doi: 10.1038/ng0996-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Lindgren CM, Mahtani MM, Widen E, McCarthy MI, Daly MJ, Kirby A, Reeve MP, Kruglyak L, Parker A, Meyer J, Almgren P, Lehto M, Kanninen T, Tuomi T, Groop LC, Lander ES. Genomewide search for type 2 diabetes mellitus susceptibility Loci in finnish families: the botnia study. AmJHumGenet. 2002;70:509–516. doi: 10.1086/338629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ehm MG, Karnoub MC, Sakul H, Gottschalk K, Holt DC, Weber JL, Vaske D, Briley D, Briley L, Kopf J, McMillen P, Nguyen Q, Reisman M, Lai EH, Joslyn G, Shepherd NS, Bell C, Wagner MJ, Burns DK. Genomewide Search for Type 2 Diabetes Susceptibility Genes in Four American Populations. AmJHumGenet. 2000;66:1871–1881. doi: 10.1086/302950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Bektas A, Suprenant ME, Wogan LT, Plengvidhya N, Rich SS, Warram JH, Krolewski AS, Doria A. Evidence of a novel type 2 diabetes locus 50 cM centromeric to NIDDM2 on chromosome 12q. Diabetes. 1999;48:2246–2251. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.11.2246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Bektas A, Hughes JN, Warram JH, Krolewski AS, Doria A. Type 2 diabetes locus on 12q15. Further mapping and mutation screening of two candidate genes. Diabetes. 2001;50:204–208. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.1.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Shaw JT, Lovelock PK, Kesting JB, Cardinal J, Duffy D, Wainwright B, Cameron DP. Novel susceptibility gene for late-onset NIDDM is localized to human chromosome 12q. Diabetes. 1998;47:1793–1796. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.47.11.1793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Wiltshire S, Frayling TM, Groves CJ, Levy JC, Hitman GA, Sampson M, Walker M, Menzel S, Hattersley AT, Cardon LR, McCarthy MI. Evidence from a large U.K. family collection that genes influencing age of onset of type 2 diabetes map to chromosome 12p and to the MODY3/NIDDM2 locus on 12q24. Diabetes. 2004;53:855–860. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.3.855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Hanson RL, Ehm MG, Pettitt DJ, Prochazka M, Thompson DB, Timberlake D, Foroud T, Kobes S, Baier L, Burns DK, Almasy L, Blangero J, Garvey WT, Bennett PH, Knowler WC. An autosomal genomic scan for loci linked to type II diabetes mellitus and body-mass index in Pima Indians. AmJHumGenet. 1998;63:1130–1138. doi: 10.1086/302061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Hsueh WC, St Jean PL, Mitchell BD, Pollin TI, Knowler WC, Ehm MG, Bell CJ, Sakul H, Wagner MJ, Burns DK, Shuldiner AR. Genome-Wide and Fine-Mapping Linkage Studies of Type 2 Diabetes and Glucose Traits in the Old Order Amish: Evidence for a New Diabetes Locus on Chromosome 14q11 and Confirmation of a Locus on Chromosome 1q21–q24. Diabetes. 2003;52:550–557. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.2.550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Vionnet N, Hani EH, Dupont S, Gallina S, Francke S, Dotte S, De Matos F, Durand E, Lepretre F, Lecoeur C, Gallina P, Zekiri L, Dina C, Froguel P. Genomewide Search for Type 2 Diabetes-Susceptibility Genes in French Whites: Evidence for a Novel Susceptibility Locus for Early-Onset Diabetes on Chromosome 3q27-qter and Independent Replication of a Type 2-Diabetes Locus on Chromosome 1q21–q24. AmJHumGenet. 2000;67:1470–1480. doi: 10.1086/316887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Wiltshire S, Hattersley AT, Hitman GA, Walker M, Levy JC, Sampson M, O’Rahilly S, Frayling TM, Bell JI, Lathrop GM, Bennett A, Dhillon R, Fletcher C, Groves CJ, Jones E, Prestwich P, Simecek N, Rao PV, Wishart M, Foxon R, Howell S, Smedley D, Cardon LR, Menzel S, McCarthy MI. A Genomewide Scan for Loci Predisposing to Type 2 Diabetes in a U.K. Population (The Diabetes UK Warren 2 Repository): Analysis Of 573 Pedigrees Provides Independent Replication of a Susceptibility Locus on Chromosome 1q. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:553–569. doi: 10.1086/323249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Meigs JB, Panhuysen CI, Myers RH, Wilson PW, Cupples LA. A genome-wide scan for loci linked to plasma levels of glucose and HbA(1c) in a community-based sample of Caucasian pedigrees: The Framingham Offspring Study. Diabetes. 2002;51:833–840. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.3.833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Ng MC, So WY, Cox NJ, Lam VK, Cockram CS, Critchley JA, Bell GI, Chan JC. Genome-wide scan for type 2 diabetes loci in Hong Kong Chinese and confirmation of a susceptibility locus on chromosome 1q21–q25. Diabetes. 2004;53:1609–1613. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.6.1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Du W, Sun H, Wang H, Qiang B, Shen Y, Yao Z, Gu J, Xiong M, Huang W, Chen Z, Zuo J, Hua X, Gao W, Sun Q, Fang F. Confirmation of susceptibility gene loci on chromosome 1 in northern China Han families with type 2 diabetes. Chin MedJ(Engl) 2001;114:876–878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.McCarthy MI. Growing evidence for diabetes susceptibility genes from genome scan data. CurrDiabRep. 2003;3:159–167. doi: 10.1007/s11892-003-0040-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Das SK, Hasstedt SJ, Zhang Z, Elbein SC. Linkage and Association Mapping of a Chromosome 1q21–q24 Type 2 Diabetes Susceptibility Locus in Northern European Caucasians. Diabetes. 2004;53:492–499. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.2.492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Wang H, Chu W, Das SK, Ren Q, Hasstedt SJ, Elbein SC. Liver pyruvate kinase polymorphisms are associated with type 2 diabetes in northern European Caucasians. Diabetes. 2002;51:2861–2865. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.9.2861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Das SK, Chu W, Zhang Z, Hasstedt SJ, Elbein SC. Calsquestrin 1 (CASQ1) gene polymorphisms under chromosome 1q21 linkage peak are associated with type 2 diabetes in Northern European Caucasians. Diabetes. 2004;53:3300–3306. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.12.3300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Fu M, Damcott CM, Sabra M, Pollin TI, Ott SH, Wang J, Garant MJ, O’Connell JR, Mitchell BD, Shuldiner AR. Polymorphism in the Calsequestrin 1 (CASQ1) Gene on Chromosome 1q21 Is Associated With Type 2 Diabetes in the Old Order Amish. Diabetes. 2004;53:3292–3299. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.12.3292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Parker A, Meyer J, Lewitzky S, Rennich JS, Chan G, Thomas JD, Orho-Melander M, Lehtovirta M, Forsblom C, Hyrkko A, Carlsson M, Lindgren C, Groop LC. A gene conferring susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in conjunction with obesity is located on chromosome 18p11. Diabetes. 2001;50:675–680. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.3.675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Aulchenko YS, Vaessen N, Heutink P, Pullen J, Snijders PJ, Hofman A, Sandkuijl LA, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Edwards M, Bennett S, Oostra BA, van Duijn CM. A genome-wide search for genes involved in type 2 diabetes in a recently genetically isolated population from the Netherlands. Diabetes. 2003;52:3001–3004. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.12.3001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.van Tilburg JH, Sandkuijl LA, Strengman E, van Someren H, Rigters-Aris CA, Pearson PL, van Haeften TW, Wijmenga C. A genome-wide scan in type 2 diabetes mellitus provides independent replication of a susceptibility locus on 18p11 and suggests the existence of novel Loci on 2q12 and 19q13. JClinEndocrinolMetab. 2003;88:2223–2230. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Francke S, Manraj M, Lacquemant C, Lecoeur C, Lepretre F, Passa P, Hebe A, Corset L, Yan SL, Lahmidi S, Jankee S, Gunness TK, Ramjuttun US, Balgobin V, Dina C, Froguel P. A genome-wide scan for coronary heart disease suggests in Indo- Mauritians a susceptibility locus on chromosome 16p13 and replicates linkage with the metabolic syndrome on 3q27. HumMolGenet. 2001;10:2751–2765. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.24.2751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Duggirala R, Almasy L, Blangero J, Jenkinson CP, Arya R, DeFronzo RA, Stern MP, O’Connell P. Further evidence for a type 2 diabetes susceptibility locus on chromosome 11q. GenetEpidemiol. 2003;24:240–242. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.van Tilburg JH, Sandkuijl LA, Franke L, Strengman E, Pearson PL, van Haeften TW, Wijmenga C. Genome-wide screen in obese pedigrees with type 2 diabetes mellitus from a defined Dutch population. EurJClinInvest. 2003;33:1070–1074. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2003.01276.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Horikawa Y, Oda N, Cox NJ, Li X, Orho-Melander M, Hara M, Hinokio Y, Lindner TH, Mashima H, Schwarz PE, Bosque-Plata L, Horikawa Y, Oda Y, Yoshiuchi I, Colilla S, Polonsky KS, Wei S, Concannon P, Iwasaki N, Schulze J, Baier LJ, Bogardus C, Groop L, Boerwinkle E, Hanis CL, Bell GI. Genetic variation in the gene encoding calpain-10 is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. NatGenet. 2000;26:163–175. doi: 10.1038/79876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Baier LJ, Permana PA, Yang X, Pratley RE, Hanson RL, Shen GQ, Mott D, Knowler WC, Cox NJ, Horikawa Y, Oda N, Bell GI, Bogardus C. A calpain-10 gene polymorphism is associated with reduced muscle mRNA levels and insulin resistance. JClinInvest. 2000;106:R69–R73. doi: 10.1172/JCI10665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Cox NJ, Hayes MG, Roe CA, Tsuchiya T, Bell GI. Linkage of calpain 10 to type 2 diabetes: the biological rationale. Diabetes. 2004;53(Suppl 1):S19–25. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.2007.s19. S19–S25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Weedon MN, Schwarz PE, Horikawa Y, Iwasaki N, Illig T, Holle R, Rathmann W, Selisko T, Schulze J, Owen KR, Evans J, Bosque-Plata L, Hitman G, Walker M, Levy JC, Sampson M, Bell GI, McCarthy MI, Hattersley AT, Frayling TM. Meta-analysis and a large association study confirm a role for calpain-10 variation in type 2 diabetes susceptibility. AmJHumGenet. 2003;73:1208–1212. doi: 10.1086/379285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Song Y, Niu T, Manson JE, Kwiatkowski DJ, Liu S. Are variants in the CAPN10 gene related to risk of type 2 diabetes? A quantitative assessment of population and family-based association studies. AmJHumGenet. 2004;74:208–222. doi: 10.1086/381400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Elbein SC, Chu W, Ren Q, Hemphill C, Schay J, Cox NJ, Hanis CL, Hasstedt SJ. Role of calpain-10 gene variants in familial type 2 diabetes in Caucasians. JClinEndocrinolMetab. 2002;87:650–654. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.2.8210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Orho-Melander M, Klannemark M, Svensson MK, Ridderstrale M, Lindgren CM, Groop L. Variants in the calpain-10 gene predispose to insulin resistance and elevated free fatty acid levels. Diabetes. 2002;51:2658–2664. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.8.2658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Lyssenko V, Almgren P, Anevski D, Orho-Melander M, Sjogren M, Saloranta C, Tuomi T, Groop L Botnia Study Group. Genetic Prediction of Future Type 2 Diabetes. PLOS Medicine. 2005;2:1299–1308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Silander K, Mohlke KL, Scott LJ, Peck EC, Hollstein P, Skol AD, Jackson AU, Deloukas P, Hunt S, Stavrides G, Chines PS, Erdos MR, Narisu N, Conneely KN, Li C, Fingerlin TE, Dhanjal SK, Valle TT, Bergman RN, Tuomilehto J, Watanabe RM, Boehnke M, Collins FS. Genetic Variation Near the Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-4alpha Gene Predicts Susceptibility to Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53:1141–1149. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.4.1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Love-Gregory LD, Wasson J, Ma J, Jin CH, Glaser B, Suarez BK, Permutt MA. A Common Polymorphism in the Upstream Promoter Region of the Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-4alpha Gene on Chromosome 20q Is Associated With Type 2 Diabetes and Appears to Contribute to the Evidence for Linkage in an Ashkenazi Jewish Population. Diabetes. 2004;53:1134–1140. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.4.1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Vaxillaire M, Dina C, Lobbens S, Dechaume A, Vasseur-Delannoy V, Helbecque N, Charpentier G, Froguel P. Effect of common polymorphisms in the HNF4alpha promoter on susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in the French Caucasian population. Diabetologia. 2005;48:440–444. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1665-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Hansen SK, Rose CS, Glumer C, Drivsholm T, Borch-Johnsen K, Jorgensen T, Pedersen O, Hansen T. Variation near the hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-4alpha gene associates with type 2 diabetes in the Danish population. Diabetologia. 2005;48:452–458. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-1671-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Weedon MN, Owen KR, Shields B, Hitman G, Walker M, McCarthy MI, Love-Gregory LD, Permutt MA, Hattersley AT, Frayling TM. Common variants of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-4alpha P2 promoter are associated with type 2 diabetes in the U.K. population. Diabetes. 2004;53:3002–3006. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.11.3002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Damcott CM, Hoppman N, Ott SH, Reinhart LJ, Wang J, Pollin TI, O’Connell JR, Mitchell BD, Shuldiner AR. Polymorphisms in both promoters of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-alpha are associated with type 2 diabetes in the Amish. Diabetes. 2004;53:3337–3341. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.12.3337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Muller YL, Infante AM, Hanson RL, Love-Gregory L, Knowler W, Bogardus C, Baier LJ. Variants in hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha are modestly associated with type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians. Diabetes. 2005;54:3035–3039. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.10.3035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Winckler W, Graham RR, de Bakker PI, Sun M, Almgren P, Tuomi T, Gaudet D, Hudson TJ, Ardlie KG, Daly MJ, Hirschhorn JN, Groop L, Altshuler D. Association testing of variants in the hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha gene with risk of type 2 diabetes in 7,883 people. Diabetes. 2005;54:886–892. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.3.886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Bento JL, Palmer ND, Mychaleckyj JC, Lange LA, Langefeld CD, Rich SS, Freedman BI, Bowden DW. Association of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B gene polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53:3007–3012. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.11.3007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Palmer ND, Bento JL, Mychaleckyj JC, Langefeld CD, Campbell JK, Norris JM, Haffner SM, Bergman RN, Bowden DW. Association of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B gene polymorphisms with measures of glucose homeostasis in Hispanic Americans: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study (IRAS) family study. Diabetes. 2004;53:3013–3019. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.11.3013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Florez JC, Agapakis CM, Burtt NP, Sun M, Almgren P, Rastam L, Tuomi T, Gaudet D, Hudson TJ, Daly MJ, Ardlie KG, Hirschhorn JN, Groop L, Altshuler D. Association testing of the protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B gene (PTPN1) with type 2 diabetes in 7,883 people. Diabetes. 2005;54:1884–1891. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.6.1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Fu M, Sabra M, Damcott C, Pollini TI, Ott S, Tanner K, Wang J, Shi X, Connell JM, Mitchell BD, Shuldiner AR: Strong association of intragenic SNPs with type 2 diabetes in the 152 megabase region of chromosome 1q21 in the Old Order Amish (Abstract). American Society of Human Genetics 54th Meeting Abstracts, 2004
- 141.Zeggini E, Rayner W, Groves CJ, Hanson RL, Mitchell BD, Osapos J, Connell MV, Jia W, Ng MCY, Knowler WC, Baier LJ, Froguel P, Xiang K, Chan JCN, Deloukas P, Cardon L, Bogardus C, Elbein SC, Shuldiner A, McCarthy M. Meta-Analysis of 3000 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms from Chromosome 1q in Samples from Seven Linked Populations Reveals Shared Type 2 Diabetes Susceptibility Variants (Abstract) Diabetes. 2005;54(Suppl 2) [Google Scholar]
- 142.Gibson F, Froguel P. Genetics of the APM1 locus and its contribution to type 2 diabetes susceptibility in French Caucasians. Diabetes. 2004;53:2977–2983. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.11.2977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Zacharova J, Chiasson JL, Laakso M. The common polymorphisms (single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] +45 and SNP +276) of the adiponectin gene predict the conversion from impaired glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes: the STOP-NIDDM trial. Diabetes. 2005;54:893–899. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.3.893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Vozarova de Court, Hanson RL, Funahashi T, Lindsay RS, Matsuzawa Y, Tanaka S, Thameem F, Gruber JD, Froguel P, Wolford JK. Common Polymorphisms in the Adiponectin Gene ACDC Are Not Associated With Diabetes in Pima Indians. Diabetes. 2005;54:284–289. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.1.284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Grant SF, Thorleifsson G, Reynisdottir I, Benediktsson R, Manolescu A, Sainz J, Helgason A, Stefansson H, Emilsson V, Helgadottir A, Styrkarsdottir U, Magnusson KP, Walters GB, Palsdottir E, Jonsdottir T, Gudmundsdottir T, Gylfason A, Saemundsdottir J, Wilensky RL, Reilly MP, Rader DJ, Bagger Y, Christiansen C, Gudnason V, Sigurdsson G, Thorsteinsdottir U, Gulcher JR, Kong A, Stefansson K. Variant of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene confers risk of type 2 diabetes. NatGenet. 2006;38:320–323. doi: 10.1038/ng1732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Altshuler D, Hirschhorn JN, Klannemark M, Lindgren CM, Vohl MC, Nemesh J, Lane CR, Schaffner SF, Bolk S, Brewer C, Tuomi T, Gaudet D, Hudson TJ, Daly M, Groop L, Lander ES. The common PPARgamma Pro12Ala polymorphism is associated with decreased risk of type 2 diabetes. NatGenet. 2000;26:76–80. doi: 10.1038/79216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Memisoglu A, Hu FB, Hankinson SE, Liu S, Meigs JB, Altshuler DM, Hunter DJ, Manson JE. Prospective study of the association between the proline to alanine codon 12 polymorphism in the PPARgamma gene and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2915–2917. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.10.2915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Inoue H, Ferrer J, Welling CM, Elbein SC, Hoffman M, Mayorga R, Warren-Perry M, Zhang Y, Millns H, Turner R, Province M, Bryan J, Permutt MA, Aguilar-Bryan L. Sequence variants in the sulfonylurea receptor (SUR) gene are associated with NIDDM in Caucasians. Diabetes. 1996;45:825–831. doi: 10.2337/diab.45.6.825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Hart LM, de Knijff P, Dekker JM, Stolk RP, Nijpels G, van der Does FE, Ruige JB, Grobbee DE, Heine RJ, Maassen JA. Variants in the sulphonylurea receptor gene: association of the exon 16-3t variant with Type II diabetes mellitus in Dutch Caucasians. Diabetologia. 1999;42:617–620. doi: 10.1007/s001250051203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Meirhaeghe A, Helbecque N, Cottel D, Arveiler D, Ruidavets JB, Haas B, Ferrieres J, Tauber JP, Bingham A, Amouyel P. Impact of sulfonylurea receptor 1 genetic variability on non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus prevalence and treatment: a population study. AmJMedGenet. 2001;101:4–8. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Barroso I, Luan J, Middelberg RP, Harding AH, Franks PW, Jakes RW, Clayton D, Schafer AJ, O’Rahilly S, Wareham NJ. Candidate Gene Association Study in Type 2 Diabetes Indicates a Role for Genes Involved in beta-Cell Function as Well as Insulin Action. PLoSBiol. 2003;1:E20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Hani EH, Hager J, Philippi A, Demenais F, Froguel P, Vionnet N. Mapping NIDDM susceptibility loci in French families: studies with markers in the region of NIDDM1 on chromosome 2q. Diabetes. 1997;46:1225–1226. doi: 10.2337/diab.46.7.1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Gloyn AL, Weedon MN, Owen KR, Turner MJ, Knight BA, Hitman G, Walker M, Levy JC, Sampson M, Halford S, McCarthy MI, Hattersley AT, Frayling TM. Large-scale association studies of variants in genes encoding the pancreatic beta-cell Katp channel subunits Kir6.2 (KCNJ11) and SUR1 (ABCC8) confirm that the KCNJ11 E23K variant is associated with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2003;52:568–572. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.2.568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Florez JC, Burtt N, de Bakker PI, Almgren P, Tuomi T, Holmkvist J, Gaudet D, Hudson TJ, Schaffner SF, Daly MJ, Hirschhorn JN, Groop L, Altshuler D. Haplotype structure and genotype-phenotype correlations of the sulfonylurea receptor and the islet ATP-sensitive potassium channel gene region. Diabetes. 2004;53:1360–1368. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.5.1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Elbein SC, Sun J, Scroggin E, Teng K, Hasstedt SJ. Role of common sequence variants in insulin secretion in familial type 2 diabetic kindreds: the sulfonylurea receptor, glucokinase, and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1alpha genes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:472–478. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.3.472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Hansen T, Echwald SM, Hansen L, Moller AM, Almind K, Clausen JO, Urhammer SA, Inoue H, Ferrer J, Bryan J, Aguilar-Bryan L, Permutt MA, Pedersen O. Decreased tolbutamide-stimulated insulin secretion in healthy subjects with sequence variants in the high-affinity sulfonylurea receptor gene. Diabetes. 1998;47:598–605. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.47.4.598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Inoue H, Ferrer J, Warren-Perry M, Zhang Y, Millns H, Turner RC, Elbein SC, Hampe CL, Suarez BK, Inagaki N, Seino S, Permutt MA. Sequence variants in the pancreatic islet beta-cell inwardly rectifying K+ channel Kir6.2 (Bir) gene: identification and lack of role in Caucasian patients with NIDDM. Diabetes. 1997;46:502–507. doi: 10.2337/diab.46.3.502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Sakura H, Wat N, Horton V, Millns H, Turner RC, Ashcroft FM. Sequence variations in the human Kir6.2 gene, a subunit of the beta- cell ATP-sensitive K-channel: no association with NIDDM in while Caucasian subjects or evidence of abnormal function when expressed in vitro. Diabetologia. 1996;39:1233–1236. doi: 10.1007/BF02658512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Schwanstecher C, Meyer U, Schwanstecher M. K(IR)6.2 polymorphism predisposes to type 2 diabetes by inducing overactivity of pancreatic beta-cell ATP-sensitive K(+) channels. Diabetes. 2002;51:875–879. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.3.875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Nielsen EM, Hansen L, Carstensen B, Echwald SM, Drivsholm T, Glumer C, Thorsteinsson B, Borch-Johnsen K, Hansen T, Pedersen O. The E23K variant of Kir6.2 associates with impaired post-OGTT serum insulin response and increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2003;52:573–577. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.2.573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.‘t Hart LM, van Haeften TW, Dekker JM, Bot M, Heine RJ, Maassen JA. Variations in insulin secretion in carriers of the E23K variant in the KIR6.2 subunit of the ATP-sensitive K(+) channel in the beta-cell. Diabetes. 2002;51:3135–3138. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.10.3135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Elbein S, Rotwein P, Permutt MA, Bell GI, Sanz N, Karam JH. Lack of association of the polymorphic locus in the 5′-flanking region of the human insulin gene and diabetes in American blacks. Diabetes. 1985;34:433–439. doi: 10.2337/diab.34.5.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Le Stunff C, Fallin D, Schork NJ, Bougneres P. The insulin gene VNTR is associated with fasting insulin levels and development of juvenile obesity. NatGenet. 2000;26:444–446. doi: 10.1038/82579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Dunger DB, Ong KK, Huxtable SJ, Sherriff A, Woods KA, Ahmed ML, Golding J, Pembrey ME, Ring S, Bennett ST, Todd JA. Association of the INS VNTR with size at birth. ALSPAC Study Team Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood. NatGenet. 1998;19:98–100. doi: 10.1038/ng0598-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Lindsay RS, Hanson RL, Wiedrich C, Knowler WC, Bennett PH, Baier LJ. The insulin gene variable number tandem repeat class I/III polymorphism is in linkage disequilibrium with birth weight but not Type 2 diabetes in the Pima population. Diabetes. 2003;52:187–193. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.1.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Mitchell SM, Hattersley AT, Knight B, Turner T, Metcalf BS, Voss LD, Davies D, McCarthy A, Wilkin TJ, Smith GD, Ben Shlomo Y, Frayling TM. Lack of support for a role of the insulin gene variable number of tandem repeats minisatellite (INS-VNTR) locus in fetal growth or type 2 diabetes-related intermediate traits in United Kingdom populations. JClinEndocrinolMetab. 2004;89:310–317. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Huxtable SJ, Saker PJ, Haddad L, Walker M, Frayling TM, Levy JC, Hitman GA, O’Rahilly S, Hattersley AT, McCarthy MI. Analysis of parent-offspring trios provides evidence for linkage and association between the insulin gene and type 2 diabetes mediated exclusively through paternally transmitted class III variable number tandem repeat alleles. Diabetes. 2000;49:126–130. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.1.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Almind K, Bjorbaek C, Vestergaard H, Hansen T, Echwald S, Pedersen O. Aminoacid polymorphisms of insulin receptor substrate-1 in non- insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1993;342:828–832. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92694-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Almind K, Inoue G, Pedersen O, Kahn CR. A common amino acid polymorphism in insulin receptor substrate-1 causes impaired insulin signaling. Evidence from transfection studies. JClinInvest. 1996;97:2569–2575. doi: 10.1172/JCI118705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Zeggini E, Parkinson J, Halford S, Owen KR, Frayling TM, Walker M, Hitman GA, Levy JC, Sampson MJ, Feskens EJ, Hattersley AT, McCarthy MI. Association studies of insulin receptor substrate 1 gene (IRS1) variants in type 2 diabetes samples enriched for family history and early age of onset. Diabetes. 2004;53:3319–3322. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.12.3319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Florez JC, Sjogren M, Burtt N, Orho-Melander M, Schayer S, Sun M, Almgren P, Lindblad U, Tuomi T, Gaudet D, Hudson TJ, Daly MJ, Ardlie KG, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D, Groop L. Association testing in 9,000 people fails to confirm the association of the insulin receptor substrate-1 G972R polymorphism with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53:3313–3318. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.12.3313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Hara K, Tobe K, Okada T, Kadowaki H, Akanuma Y, Ito C, Kimura S, Kadowaki T. A genetic variation in the PGC-1 gene could confer insulin resistance and susceptibility to Type II diabetes. Diabetologia. 2002;45:740–743. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0803-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Ek J, Andersen G, Urhammer SA, Gaede PH, Drivsholm T, Borch-Johnsen K, Hansen T, Pedersen O. Mutation analysis of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1 (PGC-1) and relationships of identified amino acid polymorphisms to Type II diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2001;44:2220–2226. doi: 10.1007/s001250100032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Vimaleswaran KS, Radha V, Ghosh S, Majumder PP, Deepa R, Babu HN, Rao MR, Mohan V. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma co-activator-1alpha (PGC-1alpha) gene polymorphisms and their relationship to Type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians. DiabetMed. 2005;22:1516–1521. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01709.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Kim JH, Shin HD, Park BL, Cho YM, Kim SY, Lee HK, Park KS. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha promoter polymorphisms are associated with early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Korean population. Diabetologia. 2005;48:1323–1330. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-1793-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Fanelli M, Filippi E, Sentinelli F, Romeo S, Fallarino M, Buzzetti R, Leonetti F, Baroni MG. The Gly482Ser missense mutation of the Peroxisome Proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1alpha (PGC-1alpha) gene associates with reduced insulin sensitivity in normal and glucose-intolerant obese subjects. DisMarkers. 2005;21:175–180. doi: 10.1155/2005/576748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Pihlajamaki J, Kinnunen M, Ruotsalainen E, Salmenniemi U, Vauhkonen I, Kuulasmaa T, Kainulainen S, Laakso M. Haplotypes of PPARGC1A are associated with glucose tolerance, body mass index and insulin sensitivity in offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2005;48:1331–1334. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-1800-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Muller YL, Bogardus C, Pedersen O, Baier L. A Gly482Ser missense mutation in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 is associated with altered lipid oxidation and early insulin secretion in Pima Indians. Diabetes. 2003;52:895–898. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.3.895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Ambye L, Rasmussen S, Fenger M, Jorgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Madsbad S, Urhammer SA. Studies of the Gly482Ser polymorphism of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC-1alpha) gene in Danish subjects with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes ResClinPract. 2005;67:175–179. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2004.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Meyre D, Bouatia-Naji N, Tounian A, Samson C, Lecoeur C, Vatin V, Ghoussaini M, Wachter C, Hercberg S, Charpentier G, Patsch W, Pattou F, Charles MA, Tounian P, Clement K, Jouret B, Weill J, Maddux BA, Goldfine ID, Walley A, Boutin P, Dina C, Froguel P. Variants of ENPP1 are associated with childhood and adult obesity and increase the risk of glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes. NatGenet. 2005;37:863–867. doi: 10.1038/ng1604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Matsuoka N, Patki A, Tiwari HK, Allison DB, Johnson SB, Gregersen PK, Leibel RL, Chung WK: Association of K121Q polymorphism in ENPP1 (PC-1) with BMI in Caucasian and African-American adults. Int.J.Obes.(Lond). .: 2005 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 182.Bacci S, Ludovico O, Prudente S, Zhang YY, Di Paola R, Mangiacotti D, Rauseo A, Nolan D, Duffy J, Fini G, Salvemini L, Amico C, Vigna C, Pellegrini F, Menzaghi C, Doria A, Trischitta V. The K121Q polymorphism of the ENPP1/PC-1 gene is associated with insulin resistance/atherogenic phenotypes, including earlier onset of type 2 diabetes and myocardial infarction. Diabetes. 2005;54:3021–3025. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.10.3021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Abate N, Chandalia M, Satija P, Adams-Huet B, Grundy SM, Sandeep S, Radha V, Deepa R, Mohan V. ENPP1/PC-1 K121Q polymorphism and genetic susceptibility to type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54:1207–1213. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.4.1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Ioannidis JP, Ntzani EE, Trikalinos TA. ‘Racial’ differences in genetic effects for complex diseases. NatGenet. 2004;36:1312–1318. doi: 10.1038/ng1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Beck-Nielsen H, Vaag A, Poulsen P, Gaster M. Metabolic and genetic influence on glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetic subjects--experiences from relatives and twin studies. BestPractResClinEndocrinolMetab. 2003;17:445–467. doi: 10.1016/s1521-690x(03)00041-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Kapranov P, Drenkow J, Cheng J, Long J, Helt G, Dike S, Gingeras TR. Examples of the complex architecture of the human transcriptome revealed by RACE and high-density tiling arrays. Genome Res. 2005;15:987–997. doi: 10.1101/gr.3455305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Carninci P, Kasukawa T, Katayama S, Gough J, Frith MC, Maeda N, Oyama R, Ravasi T, Lenhard B, Wells C, Kodzius R, Shimokawa K, Bajic VB, Brenner SE, Batalov S, Forrest AR, Zavolan M, Davis MJ, Wilming LG, Aidinis V, Allen JE, Ambesi-Impiombato A, Apweiler R, Aturaliya RN, Bailey TL, Bansal M, Baxter L, Beisel KW, Bersano T, Bono H, Chalk AM, Chiu KP, Choudhary V, Christoffels A, Clutterbuck DR, Crowe ML, Dalla E, Dalrymple BP, de Bono B, Della GG, di Bernardo D, Down T, Engstrom P, Fagiolini M, Faulkner G, Fletcher CF, Fukushima T, Furuno M, Futaki S, Gariboldi M, Georgii-Hemming P, Gingeras TR, Gojobori T, Green RE, Gustincich S, Harbers M, Hayashi Y, Hensch TK, Hirokawa N, Hill D, Huminiecki L, Iacono M, Ikeo K, Iwama A, Ishikawa T, Jakt M, Kanapin A, Katoh M, Kawasawa Y, Kelso J, Kitamura H, Kitano H, Kollias G, Krishnan SP, Kruger A, Kummerfeld SK, Kurochkin IV, Lareau LF, Lazarevic D, Lipovich L, Liu J, Liuni S, McWilliam S, Madan BM, Madera M, Marchionni L, Matsuda H, Matsuzawa S, Miki H, Mignone F, Miyake S, Morris K, Mottagui-Tabar S, Mulder N, Nakano N, Nakauchi H, Ng P, Nilsson R, Nishiguchi S, Nishikawa S, Nori F, Ohara O, Okazaki Y, Orlando V, Pang KC, Pavan WJ, Pavesi G, Pesole G, Petrovsky N, Piazza S, Reed J, Reid JF, Ring BZ, Ringwald M, Rost B, Ruan Y, Salzberg SL, Sandelin A, Schneider C, Schonbach C, Sekiguchi K, Semple CA, Seno S, Sessa L, Sheng Y, Shibata Y, Shimada H, Shimada K, Silva D, Sinclair B, Sperling S, Stupka E, Sugiura K, Sultana R, Takenaka Y, Taki K, Tammoja K, Tan SL, Tang S, Taylor MS, Tegner J, Teichmann SA, Ueda HR, van Nimwegen E, Verardo R, Wei CL, Yagi K, Yamanishi H, Zabarovsky E, Zhu S, Zimmer A, Hide W, Bult C, Grimmond SM, Teasdale RD, Liu ET, Brusic V, Quackenbush J, Wahlestedt C, Mattick JS, Hume DA, Kai C, Sasaki D, Tomaru Y, Fukuda S, Kanamori-Katayama M, Suzuki M, Aoki J, Arakawa T, Iida J, Imamura K, Itoh M, Kato T, Kawaji H, Kawagashira N, Kawashima T, Kojima M, Kondo S, Konno H, Nakano K, Ninomiya N, Nishio T, Okada M, Plessy C, Shibata K, Shiraki T, Suzu ki S, Tagami M, Waki K, Watahiki A, Okamura-Oho Y, Suzuki H, Kawai J, Hayashizaki Y. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science. 2005;309:1559–1563. doi: 10.1126/science.1112014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Cheng J, Kapranov P, Drenkow J, Dike S, Brubaker S, Patel S, Long J, Stern D, Tammana H, Helt G, Sementchenko V, Piccolboni A, Bekiranov S, Bailey DK, Ganesh M, Ghosh S, Bell I, Gerhard DS, Gingeras TR. Transcriptional maps of 10 human chromosomes at 5-nucleotide resolution. Science. 2005;308:1149–1154. doi: 10.1126/science.1108625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Janssens AC, Gwinn M, Khoury MJ, Subramonia-Iyer S. Does genetic testing really improve the prediction of future type 2 diabetes? PlosMed. 2006;3:e114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
